Thought-terminating cliche

Propaganda and brainwashing tactic. Common to NPCs and idiots when confronted with unknown information, so they don’t have to think, they can just dismiss.

http://jorgenmodin.net/index_html/wikpedias-now-deleted-page-on-thought-terminating-cliche

“The language of the totalist environment is characterized by the thought-terminating cliché. The most far-reaching and complex of human problems are compressed into brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized and easily expressed. These become the start and finish of any ideological analysis.”

They know. It was deleted until I drew attention to that fact.

From

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_Reform_and_the_Psychology_of_Totalism

The book didn’t come up when I put it in the search engine, you must know where it is.

https://archive.org/details/ThoughtReformAndThePsychologyOfTotalism

Probably related to mentacide.

http://thoughtprison-pc.blogspot.com

for how they introduced this.

“Panic Attack”…. or Anger?

We need MRI studies. Amygdala and aggression arousal. Can they be differentiated from men with weakly controlled rage outbursts cycling with depression?

Otherwise it seems convenient panic attacks are the modern hysteria.

https://psychcentral.com/news/2012/12/05/link-between-anger-and-anxiety/48618.html

It would explain why they’re experiencing “anxiety” when it’s expected they’d feel anger.

Anyone deliberately mislabeling or lying about a diagnosis (malingering) is using a manipulation tactic.

https://therichardstraumaprocess.com/casestudies/teenage-female-experiencing-panic-attacks-anger-severe-anxiety-depression-low-self-esteem-eating-disorders/

“Panic attacks when feeling angry & frustrated.”

Common. They do under-diagnose female sociopathy and what they describe as panic would, in a man, be a tantrum or angry outburst. Anger attacks.

Sociopaths are not cool and calm like Dexter, they’re angry messes.

https://www.verywellmind.com/panic-attacks-and-anger-attacks-the-difference-2584386
https://www.calmclinic.com/anxiety/symptoms/anger

http://anxietynetwork.com/content/gad-and-anger
“A recent study examined anger and the role it plays in the maintenance of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). Researchers examined hostility, physical and verbal aggression, how anger is expressed, and how anger is controlled. More than 380 participants with GAD were tested on their responses to statements that were anger-related such as “I strike out at whatever infuriates me.” The study found that higher levels of anger were associated with worry and anxiety. In addition, hostility and internalized anger contributed to the severity of the participants’ GAD symptoms. Thus, internalized anger made generalized anxiety stronger. Anger fanned the flames of worry and anxiety. Researchers suggested that anger could be detrimental during the treatment of GAD, especially if it is not brought up and handled during the patient’s therapy.
Dr. Richards expresses it like this: You can never get better from any of the anxiety disorders by using another negative emotion. Any negative emotion (i.e.., anger) feeds and fuels other negative emotions (e.g.., anxiety). So, while it may be nice to think you can get better by being angry at anxiety, in fact all it does is make anxiety worse.”

Hold women accountable for their anger issues.

OT

Could low IQ people be said to have panic attacks?

There’s also a definite tendency to let people with more money off on a lighter diagnosis.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3269637/

“Relatively high anxiety in patients with GAD predicted high IQ”
Relatively.
“whereas relatively low anxiety in controls also predicted high IQ.”
Intelligent people aren’t neurotic messes. They’re confusing educated with intelligent again.

Contrary to the high IQ propaganda you can find on Google, a real study:
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2008/12/2/scientists-tie-low-iq-to-disorders/

Researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health have concluded that children born with lower IQs possess higher risk of psychiatric disorders, according to a decades-long study of 1000 people in New Zealand. Children with lower IQ levels were more vulnerable to having chronic psychiatric disorders after the age of 32, researchers said. 

The study was conducted on a cohort of children born between 1972 and 1973 in Dunedin, New Zealand and first tested at age three.

The participants were assessed for psychiatric disorders at ages 18 through 32 by doctors without any knowledge of the cohort members’ IQ levels or psychiatric history.

“Lower childhood IQ predicted increased risk of schizophrenia, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder,” said lead researcher Karestan Koenen, assistant professor of society, human development, and health at the School of Public Health. “Individuals with lower childhood IQ also had more persistent depression and anxiety and were more likely to be diagnosed with two or more disorders in adulthood.” 

Although the exact mechanism through which childhood IQ may be linked to higher risk of adult anxiety disorders is not known, the researchers were capable of suggesting several potential explanations.

genes?

In their report, they theorize that lower childhood IQ might suggest varied levels in brain health that make the subject more exposed to certain mental disorders.

dysgenics

The researchers further said that people with lower IQ levels find it more difficult to cope with complex modern daily life, possibly making them more vulnerable to developing psychiatric symptoms. 

….

If they can’t cope, they should be in an asylum.

Researchers argue that the findings can be helpful in treating individuals with psychiatric disorders.

“Lower childhood IQ was associated with greater severity of mental disorders including persistence over time and having two or more diagnoses at age 32,” said Koenen. “Since individuals with persistent and multiple mental disorders are more likely to seek services, cognitive ability may be an important factor for clinicians to consider in treatment planning.” 

The researchers added, however, that they could not find any correlation between lower childhood IQ and panic disorder, simple phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder or substance dependence disorders.

Stop the fake debates please

I can already feel the heat of hate I’m going to get for this.

There’s a broken record.

You’re being played.

What strawman?

Not all (crime) are (demographic) is an excuse to dismiss data.
Probability data. It happens to the HBD crowd all the time.
A derailing tactic intended to keep you ignorant and fixated on casting aspersions (ad hom). Bullshit rhetoric. There’s no debate. It’s the statistical equivalent of anecdote and rejects the heinousness of the crime in question. In a civilized, First World society, the acceptable number is zero.

They want you to forget this.

(I also think that traumatizing a person with crime should be an aggravating offence, we already implicitly have this but it’s been forgotten in sentencing for political expedience e.g. aggravating factor for taking a child’s innocence away or raping a celibate/faithful Christian or a virgin, same principle. It could even apply to male rape of a straight man, since there is another layer to the trauma based on the individual’s beliefs and identity. “Hate” crime should be put toward those ends if anything, protecting the in-group against the out-group of the really spiteful (anti-Western) predatory targeting and life ruining. The system we have is broken because it defends the out-group like infantile damsels when they are literally criminals explicitly targeting the in-group of the society they chose to live in. That is “sexual terrorism”.)

I’ll take the one with more data as example.

Muh “not all men are rapists”

– but most rapists are male, it’s just un-PC to collect demographic data (including race) and publish it.

Seriously, try to find rape data by sex and/or sexuality, I did. Couldn’t find anything reliable. Isn’t this suspicious?

We need a data collection charter where such information in the public interest must be collected and published freely, with no distortions. Including the rate of demonstrably false accusations. It viscerally sickens me that a raped man by another man must expressly state he isn’t homosexual to be taken more seriously. Where are the libertarians on that privacy? Consent is never an assumption, property rights begin with the body.

You’re being hoodwinked. So I looked up American data since a lot of you are filthy Americans.

You won’t pay attention unless I’m talking about you.

Best I could find in a moderately long search attempt.

https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=317

OT but “Attempted rape includes verbal threats of rape.”
How many men plead ignorance on that one?

All this insufficient data (even at collection stage) is intended to keep men and women at one another’s throats. To lower the fertility rate. It is dyscivic.

Sex-based triangulation. You cannot fight the system that oppresses you if you’re busy engaging in an impossible game of one-upmanship.

They also want to deny unPC but true stereotypes by hoping you won’t ask for full datasets.

Your taxes are paying for them already, you should get all the information.

They also are intellectually dishonest to report victim but not criminal.
https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=6427
Revised Oct 2018 data from 2016 (latest).
e.g.
“The rate of violent victimization against males increased from 2015 to 2016, rising from 15.9 to 19.6 per 1,000 males age 12 or older.
From 2015 to 2016, the rate of aggravated assault against males age 12 or older rose from 2.7 to 4.2 per 1,000.
The rate of violent victimization against persons ages 25 to 34 rose from 21.8 per 1,000 persons to 28.4 per 1,000 from 2015 to 2016, and the rate for females in this age group rose from 24.6 to 33.4 per 1,000.”

>implies women are not persons but O.K.

Who attacked them? A ghost? It is a common incomplete sentence and poor grammar. It’s also scientism.

You need a Punnett square and I see none.

Male, female and male, female. Basic stats again? Otherwise an individual reading cannot know their risk.

“Not all men” really is the fake right equivalent of the fake left’s “not all immigrants”.

-but most terrorists are foreign, culturally and racially, it’s just un-PC to collect demographic data….. again.

See the pattern?

You’re chasing your tails.

Red-pill statistics can make men look really, really bad. Men have a right to know the likes of rape data, in particular, because they need to know they’re at great risk from other men as well.

Naturally it doesn’t list the latter but they take one step forward in two steps back by collecting male victim data…. only to neglect entirely listing the female. Mathematics in need of context. Society is not just one group, you collect all the data or it’s close to useless. They know this, it’s deliberate. This is intended to bait silly MRAs who won’t even notice it doesn’t mention perp details.

They do make another error in saying Male for Male Victim rape and subsuming the female in an age range.
Piss-poor data entry. I notice everything.

Collect ALL the data or no, we cannot debate it. 

It would entirely become a futile argument of ignorance. 

They know this. Mathematically, you have no data.

Conveniently, they don’t have to change and lower the crime rate (toward zero) if you don’t know how badly they’re doing their job.


5% of the latest reported US crime was rape.
That’s absurdly high for such a specific and brutal crime.
(This is what happens when you don’t keep serial offenders off the streets).
1 in 20 criminal acts was rape. You need all the data, America.

If I hadn’t screencapped this, you probably wouldn’t have believed me.

Irony! The dramatic irony!

Statistically you’re more likely to suffer domestic violence than stranger violence. That is horrifying. You were over twice as likely to get raped as burgled (1.99% in 2016). Do the libertarians care about bodily rights? Statistically they should care twice as much as about burglaries. The average citizen is twice as likely to be raped as generally assaulted, do you consider non-sexual assault a real problem?

You call yourself the First World? Greatest nation on Earth? Please, lead by example.

We’re right there with you. Bring back the standards of civil behavior, the etiquette. Update it, sure, but you do need it back again, what little data you have is starkly apparent in this. Perhaps enshrined in law, to make sure everyone is clear.

Not all- is NOT how statistics work.
Using big words doesn’t make it a debate.
You are not sounding intelligent to anyone who uses their brain.

Demand more data and think for yourselves.

Fellow Westerners are not the enemy. It is those who keep you shrouded in ignorance and wasting your time attending a digital circus of vicious fallacies. Oh but the delivery of their lies is so sweet, right?

Not all (blank) – they cant.

They don’t have to be.

It’s a false equivalence.

Rape doesn’t belong in the First World and neither do hostile foreigners.

Hopefully you can see why they won’t let me near a television camera.

You’re only watching the puppets who never raise real points. You can’t settle real issues in a soundbite or cheeky Youtube clip.

“Boys will be boys” is pathological altruism enabling the psychopathic of the male population against everyone else and sexist infantilisation.

Science discovers freeze response in rape

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sexual-assault-may-trigger-involuntary-paralysis

Tonic immobility occurs in other animals, there’s plenty of biological evidence.
It’s taking years to sort out the newfangled ‘rape gang’ problem with the cheapest solution, a rope, because society (politicians) continue to labour under the delusion that the likes of Ted Bundy was just a serial killer and completely skirt that ‘serial rapist’ is a thing. Most rape is conducted by serial rapists. SJWs don’t mention this for political reasons and something something “stigma”. Like pathology can’t be a ‘bad’ thing.
Because why would predators be sexual predators, and derive pleasure from more than one form of domination and suffering?
That’s just crazy-talk.
Next you’ll say there’s some type of amygdala causing the shutdown!

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361923006000517

Don’t look in that door!
Definitely don’t go looking for forensic evidence when it comes to rapists and rape gangs, that’s for sure!

They don’t continue to offend with full malice and moreover, escalate – like a serial killer.

This doesn’t constitute reckless public endangerment for political correctness!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/f78ad097-77d7-4ec0-8014-54ace0fc4b11
“I’m a man and I was raped.”
He froze and it wasn’t his fault, it isn’t a choice.

Die Hard lied to you.

Around predators (including the “human” variety) your brain does strange things.
It evolved because surviving with trauma is still surviving, biologically. Evolution is cruel.
In light of all this, consent laws definitely need amendment.
France needs an age of consent, for one.

Horniness =/= consent, this isn’t Brave New World.
Yet children are taught this. By the state. So they can blame the victim for, say, walking with a man or socializing. Summon the church elders, the slattern deserved it for feeling LUST! According to him. Don’t ask the adult man to control himself, perish the thought!

Imagine trying to argue that the other way, like if a man gets a random erection, that’s consent? Nope, the body is weird. Being “turned on” only equals knocking boots in porn. IRL it’s a non sequitur.

Court rules he cannot be prosecuted for rape as she did not protest

The girl’s family says she was silent as she was ‘paralysed by fear’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4925422/French-court-rules-girl-11-consented-sex-man-28.html

Coming to a bar near you

or a public street….

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woman-gang-raped-three-men-13525513

Why are women so paranoid?

You should be too. I find it deeply ironic the guys complaining women should feel safe with strangers (no?) often want to open-carry a gun just in case despite being better equipped physically to defend themselves without one.

Riddle me that bullshit.

nb

This assumes they aren’t choked, as sober (no alcohol or other drugs) people often are prior to any other assault, sexual or otherwise.

However, if they’re held down by others in a gang, usually choking is dispensed with (as forensic evidence).

Why do serial predators do this?
It can knock you out, women can be lead to a rape or kill zone elsewhere or thrown in a car for slavery, looking drunk and at best from their end, it’ll weaken your body and decision-making from oxygen deprivation.
That’s how practiced they are.

The term predator is literal, they base their lives around these machinations specifically calculated to exploit your human weaknesses including politeness, conformity and friendliness. How many discussions of rape mention this fact?

If only that drunk man knew this, he might’ve been spared. We distrust nice people for this reason.

“We must learn and then teach our children that niceness does not equal goodness. Niceness is a decision, a strategy of social interaction; it is not a character trait. People seeking to control others almost always present the image of a nice person in the beginning.” – Gavin De Becker

The guys online who don’t get this don’t want laws that protect them, too. Because plenty of serial rapists (unPC spoiler alert) are men – and gay. Deep down, a lot of men already know this and it’s a big factor in homoaversion. Avoiding rape, they have every right to.

Personally I don’t believe it’s fair on other prisoners to put rapists with the rest of the population.