Civilization and the Diamond Rule

http://www.sociopathworld.com/2011/09/diamond-rule.html

If your civilization is under threat, deal with the threat by applying the Iron Rule.

If your civilization is homogeneous and not under existential threat, apply the Diamond Rule (individualistic culture, honour, virtue, justice, merit).

The whiny bitches saying “an eye for an eye makes the world blind” (no, it doesn’t, most people wouldn’t go around ripping out eyes, Jack the Ripper) have no sympathy for the guy to lose his eye firstly because the first guy felt entitled to harm him without consequence. There was no choice on the victim’s side, except a taste of medicine. Old Testament justice. The attacker will think twice before doing it again.

It’s a paradox that killing killers will reduce the amount of murder in society. They also tend to be rapists too so bonus points for overall suffering (serial killers, serial rapists, and plenty of male-on-male rape including of children so don’t feel bad, really). It’s a myth the criminal are naive, they are sneaky. Low IQ enjoys aggression as self-expression. They don’t operate normally, they’re print errors, that’s the point. Nature would cull them the first time they get into a fight in the middle of nowhere and bleed out but society comes to every stranger’s rescue. We live in a gullible fantasy world of fiat resources. The “Note of” dollar is your God.

If American prisons were more… medieval, would people so flippantly commit crime?

The military is the actual, real-world model of equality. You’re all equally disposable bloodbags.

Nature has consequences, man is an animal. Get into fights? Live by the sword. Narcissists will swipe at everyone then whine and DARVO when you swipe back in defence. Don’t fall for the gaslight.

The Left writes laws to keeps its idiot rage-filled voters alive. It’s baby-proofing society.

Dueling culture was the eternal solution to this, the second you have legal recourse to fight back, suddenly and magically they don’t have a problem with you. Bring it back Trump, and watch the windbags STFU.

The benefit of the doubt applies ONCE on a minor triviality. Any further is infantilisation. It doesn’t apply to spite and motive.

Source: Classical Art Memes

ADD meds lower testosterone

Wait, people didn’t know this?

Fake diagnosis, real hormonal nuke.

Amphetamines (and any other drugs that block dopamine indirectly) cause prolactin (yes, the milk hormone) levels to rise. Higher prolactin levels cause a reduced libido (your body* thinks it’s pregnant or postpartum) and tank your testosterone levels.

*Men are mutated women so yes this applies to you. Biology, bitch. If the template for human weren’t female (at least one X), we couldn’t give birth.

Why else do you think they wanna foist those drugs onto little boys?

Why do you think there’s a random surge in boys actually believing their girls, because the parents cleared use of amphetamines? We literally give kids amphetamines. We live in a society. This permanently alters their brain development, irreversible in adulthood.

They also want to ruin marriage.

https://www.adhdmarriage.com/content/low-testosterone-adhd-and-adderall

Enough foreplay.

Onto the SCIENCE!

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6642414

“These results indicate that Amph is a poor PRL suppressor in either normo- or hyperprolactinemic subjects. It is proposed that this may be due to the drug’s ability to effect release of dopamine mainly from a non-granular pool of the amine.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prolactin_release-inhibiting_factor

“The prolactin cells that produce prolactin, in the absence of dopamine, secrete prolactin continuously;

dopamine inhibits this secretion. In the context of regulating prolactin secretion, dopamine is occasionally called prolactin-inhibiting factor, prolactin-inhibiting hormone, or prolactostatin.”

Of course you won’t find it online until some MGTOW blog rips me off. Again.

It isn’t explained this way, the real way, in textbooks. So I know.

I see you.

inb4

https://www.rxlist.com/adderall-drug.htm

Adderall® tablets contain d-amphetamine and l-amphetamine salts in the ratio of 3:1.”

Cause of the gamma plague?

Link: Self-sabotage and fear of success

https://www.mentalhelp.net/blogs/do-you-fear-success/

It should go without saying that none of us can change the things we do not know about. If they do not want to know about it how can they want to change. After all, nothing is wrong in the mind of this type of individual. How can that be? How do the explain all the bad things that happen to them? The answers to these questions is that they engage in a variety of rationalizations: 1. They blame others, 2. They blame their fate or karma, 3. They blame racism, 4. Religious prejudice, 5. Sexual orientation, 6. Age, 7. Married or non married status, 8. The economy, 9. The President. 10. The weather and so it goes on and on.

So many directions with that.

But I’ll just let it mellow.

The broader mouth is masculine

because the overall skeletal frame of a man is masculine and larger too, including the broad mandible (manjaw).

Women also have a lower mandible curve, sometimes invisible to the eye, which is softer.

I shouldn’t have to point this out but… here we are.

Apparently most people can’t use their eyes.

This answers the question of why most men are repulsed by Angelina Jolie, whose lower third of her face is manly – broad mandible, thick-lipped (men are overall thicker-lipped, compared to their sisters) and a wider mouth. Meanwhile, plenty of women find her attractive – because of the lower face, that repulses men.

Scanning for survivors

https://archive.md/f0O9R

They want to know who to keep alive during the depopulation efforts.

Admitting fitness (g is Darwinian fitness) involves admitting low fitness including the most dysgenic ranges of human specimens ever to exist. We live in an era where multiple generations of imbeciles were allowed to breed and succeed. It corrupts the rest, one rotten apple spoils the barrel. It’s a unique time in history.

The rich outgroup that echoes will steal genius genes from the docile public.

And then there’s no need to keep those aged workers or useless eaters alive, is there?

In an editorial about the genetics of race published in the New York Times on March 23, Harvard University biologist David Reich cited the new genetic IQ predictors and cautioned that “all traits influenced by genetics are expected to differ across populations.”

trans. we know race is real stop blaming us

they also have to admit that “low IQ” is sub-human (an excuse for aggressive sexual deviance found in intellectually disabled populations) or even non-human in the case of basic chromosomal print errors – this is again Darwin 101 and the reason your “pro-science” schools won’t permit his work

“We are in a situation when you mention you work in intelligence, people say, “Oh, you can’t measure that.’

Testing for idiots is rather simple.

Forging transcripts to justify special treatments would also occur.

Equal treatment in education was noble. Slow kids would get extra help, the mass in the middle would get along as quickly as possible to get out and work and the smart ones given extra work when they finished early.

It was a way of boosting every child to their max potential – but you can’t magic potential out of thin air.

Darwin predicted genes and this stuff over a century ago, it isn’t deep.

There are already pressures and stereotypes and biases impairing kid performance, teachers don’t care! They support mixed sex schools that drag down female performance, they support busing in black kids to white schools while claiming the white kids are toxic – same white kids gradeboosting the black kids but dragging their own down. Mixing religions also drags down performance on tests. Employers can’t use IQ tests even when it’s life/death.

Of course environment matters. Have the longest gazelle legs, if the other guy has an AK47 to trap you it won’t matter. The State itself is an IQ shredder.

End pathological altruism of lying to idiots, making them think it’s their fault or someone else that they fail when it’s just fact, like a shortarse trying to jump high, fails.

Stop infantilising bad kids and giving them “support” for being hostile little bullies to the others while your geniuses/tall poppies languish and wither and die, your futures with it.

Otherwise GDP won’t just STAGNATE it’ll COMBUST.

Good breeding

Time for another good old-fashioned shallow posting. It’s mostly about white people because -honestly- nobody else matters if we’re being accurate and this way the weebs can’t get pissy.

https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_facial_proportions_of_beautiful_people

Anyway, why have I bothered to address the upper nasal region at length?  Consider Marquardt’s beauty mask again (Figure 13).  The shaded nasal region is unambiguously European, especially in the upper nasal region, and most non-whites and a number of whites don’t possess this type of nose.


Figure 13: Note nasal region (shaded).

Most non-whites—and some whites, too—have no hope of producing offspring with the fine nasal bones, especially upper nasal region, of the woman shown in Figure 14, even if they bred with her like.

The delicacy is the marker of “good breeding” aka civilization.

e.g.

I include my own example because… well..

No offence that’s quite an ugly looking white woman used here, especially for a Swede.


Figure 14: A woman with fine nasal bones.  Her facial proportions are more appealing for a European than some of the allegedly ideal proportions depicted by Yosh Jefferson in Figure 6; for instance, the eyes in Figure 6 are farther apart than the European norm and thereby more like that in non-Europeans.

Her eyes look weird. Awful example.

Maria Orsic would be much better.

Note: no weird eyes.

Asians literally paint in a massive, deep curve from brow to nose to look more white.

As if the Aryan-coloured contact lenses weren’t creepy enough for that sultry, dead-eyed stare.

They’re not fooling anyone.

And smaller nose, as you can see, is not better. It can make a person look sick (bad breeding) or just plain foreign. It ages something awful. Classic beauties of the Euro or specifically Anglo variety (like this English Rose) actually have a full nose, curved nostrils that don’t flare too much nor too little and a fine-boned nasal bridge all the way up into a more feminine brow, either with a straight nose shape or a slight curve. Rhinoplasties intend to trick the eye with reduced volume but cannot reconstruct upper and midfacial bone structure, especially the dainty variety (well, without a freakish egghead effect).

Straight nose above, and historically:

Compare with a weak nasal bridge, looks a bit like a duck’s bill:

Please ignore the contour makeup and lighting. It’s more obvious without…

It’s objectively, as a feature, an uglier nose. If you shopped these women with Kate or Eva’s nose, they’d be more attractive. That isn’t possible with a classic beauty.

Exotic is not classic. Sexy, yes, but not beautiful. Needs a lot of makeup, like thick eyeliner, to look normal.

An example of weak nose with the curve:

It’s just a little too thin for her face and doesn’t match the nostrils. Close but no.

The bones are clearly heavier in the later examples.
If the jaw is broad, the eyes have more distance. It’s the same with deep sea fish, dammit.

Pretty sure he’s not wearing makeup.

 

English Rose exceptions are possible with a thinner nose as long as it’s straight and the nostrils and tip relatively full. That way it fits the face.

The brow-nose contour natural to white women is blatant there.

Yes, I spend too much time staring at my fellow woman, but I wanted to figure out why one was hot and the other, not. It was pissing me off. I figured it out though.

It’s secretly the look of civility.

While I’m sure you could track IQ by nation or section e.g. Western Europe, it would more closely tack onto cultural sophistication. This is only partially represented in cultural achievements – artistic, scientific, technologic – genius, in other words. Original contribution.

Let us also address Marquardt’s beauty mask from the side (Figure 15).  Marquardt’s beauty mask is clearly that of a European and also that of a masculinized woman; some of the clearly observable masculinized traits [7, 8] include a nasoglabellar region (where the nose meets the forehead) that is curved in a masculine manner, a nose that projects in a masculine manner, a masculine chin region and a sharp gonial angle.

NOT masculine, just white.

White children have this curve, it has F-all to do with male puberty. I had it, everyone I knew had it at school, sit down America the world doesn’t revolve around you and your testosterone neurosis.

….Manly.

Maybe if you don’t know what you’re talking about, shut up?

“curved in a masculine manner” is an oxymoron

nasal projection is feminine 

a cherry chin also, feminine (projection, not the same as the jaw where it chews – gonial)

Americans think a normal chin is a recessed inbred wonder.

[whispers] No.

Stop mouth-breathing.

Beauty has a complex nature.

No, not really. High WHR and so fertility in women, broad shoulders and taller than the average woman for men.

Literally measuring tape tier.

Returning back to Saira Mohan, even though she is able to fit Marquardt’s beauty mask reasonably well, she still doesn’t qualify as a great beauty by European standards.

Standard thot look, eww.

The average girl I went to school with looked better. She isn’t a beauty, she looks slutty.

Big difference. Huge.

Rare example of both.

White men are gracile compared to other races.

They’re still the best-looking.

Bodybuilders starving themselves or mongrel models shouldn’t move your perception for cultural programming reasons. Do they look like an elf or an LA hooker? Case closed.

Rare case of both. Both is the answer.

Note the Asian jawline ruins it.

As you can tell when she turns and how she could’ve looked.

Purer Anglo (North Western European, min) stock is always better for this reason.

Show me one legacy American who looks like that. You can’t.

Even Amber Heard has the manjaw problem and a weak nose.

People in melting pot societies get uglier with every generation and everyone in them gets dragged down eventually (that’s what degeneracy means), compared to what they WOULD have been, it’s just that America has a centuries-long head start on us.

The wages of sin are death

You’re not allowed to talk about it.

I can’t think of anything worse than a cruise ship full of naked, horny Boomers.

Who still think they’re It and a bag of chips. Youth culture is cancer. The body ages but the brain remains the same…. that’s called retardation, kids!

https://www.orbitz.com/blog/2016/11/9-places-get-naked-without-raising-fuss-nsfw/

“The bar will inevitably draw its fairshare of gawkers and despite popular opinion, millennials are less likely to strip down than their baby boomer counterparts.”

Duh. Have some fucking DIGNITY.

And what does their Biblical whoredom, get them?

And yes, it’s the men pulling a Hemingway.

Suicide rates higher among baby boomer men, study finds

The women are disgusted at first with the manwhores and quietly retract (women are quiet in disgust but do have far higher sexual disgust than men, in studies) but by the time the man realises he ruined himself and even his fellow man doesn’t respect him, it’s too late.

Like the two paths pre-internet meme of a godly boy and a degenerate one. Life of vice, pay the price.

Player “burnout” is just the start.

Suicide is aka self-murder.

And atemporal, no blaming modern trends.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190313-why-more-men-kill-themselves-than-women
‘The trend goes back a long way. “As long as we’ve been recording it, we’ve seen this disparity,”
“Suicide is a hugely sensitive, complex issue with a tangled multitude of causes – and the very nature of a death by suicide means we can never fully know the reasons behind it.”
Bullshit. Kill off the white man. That’s the aim.
Men report a higher count. No, they’re not making it up, already factored in is something called a “lie scale”, I’ve taken surveys. Real ones. The maths is baked in. Even when totally anonymous with no benefit to number inflation, male count is always higher, because they’re sleeping with a smaller proportion of women.

Which niche groups have both factors?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/bisexual-women-are-at-higher-risk-for-depression-and-suicide

Why Older Gay Men Are Attempting Suicide at a Higher Rate


https://www.upi.com/Health_News/2017/10/14/Suicide-risk-for-gay-men-5x-higher-for-those-with-less-schooling-income-study/3521507999505/

PromiscuityxSuicideRisk

Is this an ageless finding?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-truth-about-exercise-addiction/201710/why-are-suicide-rates-higher-among-lgbtq-youth

https://web.archive.org/web/20141202032238/https://blogs.lcms.org/2014/study-suicide
“Robin Williams’ suicide may not have been that surprising: Baby Boomer men are 60 percent more likely to take their own life than their fathers’ generation, according to a Rutgers University sociologist.”

I wonder why the ‘free love’ generation ends up hating themselves. Mystery, that one.

“The trend is particularly alarming because middle age is typically a time when suicide rates decline before rising again in old age.”
It’s that strong of a generational change, I wonder why. What makes Boomers culturally distinct?

“The rise we’ve seen in suicide rates since 1999 among boomers while in their 40s and 50s is unusual,” Phillips said. Boomer men are now 60 percent more likely to take their own lives then men their age who were born in the 1930s — or roughly men of their fathers’ generation.

“We’re in a position now where suicide rates for middle-aged people are higher than those for the elderly,” she said. “That hasn’t happened before, at least not in the last century.”

I guess the herpes could’ve spread to their brain (a real thing).

“Their disinclination to go to church appears to be permanent.”
Sure this has NO effect on high-risk behaviour, don’t look into it. Not like it’s your job.

Let it happen. Enjoy the show. The freak show.
https://biblehub.com/romans/6-23.htm

The Lord works in mysterious ways. That’s why I like DATA.