Liars lie

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778

Liars hiring liars leads to corruption? NO. I thought they were pure moral virtuous people better than us and smarter who can never be wrong! Saints in different robes!

Fix their hiring practices, criminal charges for fraud. Done.

no more tenure

it’s an ideological dictatorship

As I’ve covered most of the lies are in social psychology, which is heavily politically biased. It’s propaganda at this point e.g. Islamophobia bullshit.

human rights violations from experimenting on wider society

ban ‘think tanks’

HIV cure was a lie

REALLY?

They wanted money?

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-09-teams-replicate-results-hiv-monkeys.html

REALLY?

In other news:

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-09-curiosity-brain-harness.html

They want to control your curiosity. Part of the mentacide protocol.

Dya have a license to search for the holodomor?

But curiosity has also been associated with characteristics that reflect risk taking, stress tolerance and thrill seeking. This is how curiosity got its bad wrap as a mortal danger to felines.

They’re trying to replicate white characteristics so they can replace white people.

Doesn’t work – the genome is one whole thing, even junk DNA affects the rest.

We all know some people tend to be more curious than others. Supporting this, research shows some individuals experience curiosity more frequently or intensely than others. But is curiosity as a  just a level of degree—more versus less?

They know it’s connected to IQ.

They KNOW.

Everyone knows at this point.

Epistemic curiosity has been widely researched. This describes a person’s desire to acquire new information—such as facts, concepts or ideas—and bridge any gaps in their knowledge.

God forbid people seek out their own information and fact-check you asshats instead of blinding swallowing your shit.

Hey, didn’t you a-holes say “educate yourselves”?

I know it was a master-suppression technique but Ys and Zoomers actually listened.

People who show perceptual curiosity, on the other hand, try to maximise the sensory information they take in—like your friend who can’t stop looking around at anything and everything.

That’s called bad parenting. It’s connected to low IQ. That is perverting the definition of curiosity.

Curiosity = need for cognition.

This research can help us to understand how we can better harness curiosity in the real world, such as in work and educational settings.

WTF.

Imagine your boss dialing up your arousal at work like a fucking thermostat.

Gaining knowledge in this way would be very different from just delivering a set teaching material.

Trying to cover IQ range differences in school, eh?

Maybe another century of pretending that works, might work?

If the teachers are so lazy, replace them with robots.

Current research has shown that the effects of curiosity on learning are even stronger for children from families with a low socioeconomic status.

Idiots are less likely to zone out if you jangle keys, can confirm.

“The fornix is part of the limbic system.”

So it’s an r/K thing.

https://agenetwork.phhp.ufl.edu/CLUFF.Edwards.UNDERGRAD.pdf

Need for Cognition, Intelligence, and Aging 

This study examined the constructs of need for cognition and intelligence (using the constituent
crystallized and fluid abilities that comprise overall intelligence) in relation to one another and over aging. Fifty young-old adults (54-69 years old) and 55 old-old adults (70-92 years old) were tested on a variety of measures, of which need for cognition, digit symbol (a measure of fluid intelligence), and vocabulary (a test of crystallized intelligence) were identified as outcome variables. The results suggest that need for cognition is significantly correlated to crystallized intelligence, need for cognition remains stable over aging, and fluid intelligence is best predicted by age.

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-09-early-exposure-key-recognising-other-race.html

They want to brainwash your kids out of all instincts for self-preservation.

“The study, led by Professor Elinor McKone, examined the “other-race effect,” a phenomenon

they made up

noticing things means you brain is WORKING

in which people have difficulty telling apart individuals of a different race to their own.”

This is why you don’t go on Third World foreign holidays, btw.

Unless you want them going off age 18 and turning up dead in Thailand with their false sense of security finally burst.

Kids need more bonding time with BOTH parents (no deadbeat dads), the oxytocin will offset the propaganda.

“The other-race effect can have serious real-world consequences,” Dr. Dawel said.

“For example, inaccurate cross-race eyewitness testimony has contributed to wrongful criminal convictions, passport misidentifications and even magazines mistakenly illustrating stories with a picture of the wrong person.”

That isn’t serious so they’re lying.

The team is now working on developing new training methods to reduce the other-race effect in adulthood.

That doesn’t sound ominous at all.

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-09-bone-marrow-piece-fertility-puzzle.html

They’re still only studying the women. Like women self-impregnate.

Can’t have the guys knowing all the DNA damage of soy, wheatgrass, HGH, etc.

Look at diet and bone marrow, duh.

Violate guest right at your peril

http://www.heretical.com/pubs/fabledh.html

The Fable of the Ducks and the Hens

….

This pleased the flock of ducks because
It gratified their pride.
But hear my tale and learn how they
Got taken for a ride.

The ducks, it seemed, spent all their time
In fixing up the place;
In growing food and building homes
And cleaning every space.

….

And so these hens began to teach 
The baby ducks and chicks. 
They traded food and eggs and things,
With many clever tricks.

…In Duckville’s church, on Sunday morn,
The preacher spoke these words:
“Discrimination’s got to stop!
Remember, we’re all birds!”

….

Let swimmers swim, let hoppers hop,
Let each go his own way
Let none coerce a fellow bird!”

Was what he had to say.

“’Twas wrong to force the hens to swim,
So here’s the problem’s crux:
It’s just as bad for hens to try
To CHICKENIZE our ducks!”

Emotional blackmail between groups.

When the hens began to spoil the young
And Gooseville’s laws to flout,
The geese rose up in righteous wrath
And simply threw them out.

Punish corruption of the young. People keep missing this crime.

R-types cannot survive alone, they must attach to other groups.

They formed a council of the hens—
“UNITED BIRDS” the name.
The other birds who joined the thing
Did not perceive the game.

They took a vote amongst themselves,
And every one approved!
“Swanville was for hens!” they said,
“Way back, before we moved!”

Triangulation.

This epic has no end because
No matter how you fight ’em,
Those HENS will show up EVERY TIME
— And so ad infinitum!

In birds perhaps, but man makes machines. Pity the only people with money are the enemy and buy the designs…. coincidence.

The first problem is that the ducks keep talking to them, trying to negotiate and telegraphing their moves. Do not engage. When they get you to talk, like a cars salesman, they win. It’s an opening. It treats them as an equal. It’s weakness. They’ll move on if met with stonewalling then you can get them from the back. Scarier to an r-type than an angered response (weak emotional control) is a neutral, unreadable wall. Narcs need to read your reaction, if there’s no speech, your face. Yes, the politely smiling kid. This is why they freaked. The English succeeded for this reason with a ‘stiff upper lip’ called RBF by Americans.

That’s rookie tier, you must look bored and vaguely disgusted. That’s how you spot the English abroad. It also triggers any vaguely left-leaning person around, at which point you flicker astonishment and shock with amusement. This is intentional and cultural.

The seed is strong in some American stock.

shock with amusement, click

Other races do not do this. Darwin studied facial expressions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Expression_of_the_Emotions_in_Man_and_Animals

TV hides this by cutting away from it, pay attention.

In addition to the classic “I smell peasant”

bored and vaguely disgusted, click like a mask

We English know for a fact that idiots respond more to your face than what you say. Anything you say.

This is why our actors are preferred over Americans, practice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affect_display

Other groups cannot do this, they look slow.

Second problem – allow youth to be corrupted.

Third – triangulation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioural_genetics

TEACH THE CONTROVERSY

The crime-genius connection in extreme IQ men

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222671325_Why_productivity_fades_with_age_The_crime-genius_connection

The biographies of 280 scientists indicate that the distribution of their age at the time of their greatest scientific contributions in their careers (age–genius curve) is similar to the age distribution of criminals (age–crime curve). The age–genius curves among jazz musicians, painters and authors are also similar to the age–crime curve. Further, marriage has a strong desistance effect on both crime and genius. I argue that this is because both crime and genius stem from men’s evolved psychological mechanism which compels them to be highly competitive in early adulthood but “turns off” when they get married and have children. Fluctuating levels of testosterone, which decreases when men get married and have children, can provide the biochemical microfoundation for this psychological mechanism. If crime and genius have the same underlying cause, then it is unlikely that social control theory (or any other theory specific to criminal behavior) can explain why men commit crimes and why they desist.

the same underlying cause being extremes of IQ

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/08/07/the-eugenic-economy/

volatile extremes

obviously they’re not the bloody same

But yes, marriage has a good effect on some people. And?

Should we reward criminals with breeding and punish genius genes?

Tesla’s highest achievement we know was done before aged 30. Clearly, something isn’t right here.

Makes more sense as a sexual selection strategy to attract a mate.

High IQ – prosocial.

Low IQ – antisocial.

General intelligence, Emotional Intelligence, leadership

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Beyond-General-Intelligence-(IQ)-and-Emotional-The-Rockstuhl-Seiler/fbf485cf6f56f27525bb507e402351ac1a45c625

Emphasizing the importance of cross-border effectiveness in the contemporary globalized world, we propose that cultural intelligence—the leadership capability to manage effectively in culturally diverse settings—is a critical leadership competency for those with cross-border responsibilities. We tested this hypothesis with multisource data, including multiple intelligences, in a sample of 126 Swiss military officers with both domestic and cross-border leadership responsibilities. Results supported our predictions:

(1) general intelligence predicted both domestic and cross-border leadership effectiveness;

(2) emotional intelligence was a stronger predictor of domestic leadership effectiveness, and

(3) cultural intelligence was a stronger predictor of cross-border leadership effectiveness. Overall, results show the value of cultural intelligence as a critical leadership competency in today’s globalized world.

EI and EQ, so girly, right? What bullshit.

Smarter people are still smart once they leave their magic dirt, really?

What women want

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6427708_The_Preferred_Traits_of_Mates_in_a_Cross-National_Study_of_Heterosexual_and_Homosexual_Men_and_Women_An_Examination_of_Biological_and_Cultural_Influences

BBC Internet survey participants (119,733 men and 98,462 women) chose from a list of 23 traits those they considered first, second, and third most important in a relationship partner. Across all participants, the traits ranked most important were: intelligence, humor, honesty, kindness, overall good looks, face attractiveness, values, communication skills, and dependability.

On average, men ranked good looks and facial attractiveness more important than women did (d = 0.55 and 0.36, respectively), whereas women ranked honesty, humor, kindness, and dependability more important than men did (ds = 0.23, 0.22, 0.18, and 0.15). Sexual orientation differences were smaller than sex differences in trait rankings, but some were meaningful; for example, heterosexual more than homosexual participants assigned importance to religion, fondness for children, and parenting abilities. Multidimensional scaling analyses showed that trait preference profiles clustered by participant sex, not by sexual orientation, and by sex more than by nationality. Sex-by-nation ANOVAs of individuals’ trait rankings showed that sex differences in rankings of attractiveness, but not of character traits, were extremely consistent across 53 nations and that nation main effects and sex-by-nation interactions were stronger for character traits than for physical attractiveness. United Nations indices of gender equality correlated, across nations, with men’s and women’s rankings of character traits but not with their rankings of physical attractiveness. These results suggest that cultural factors had a relatively greater impact on men’s and women’s rankings of character traits, whereas biological factors had a relatively greater impact on men’s and women’s rankings of physical attractiveness.

Nah, those women must be lying, they want stupid angry bad boys. All 53 nations, liars.