Political correctness will hunt you down

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-15/french-schools-replace-mother-and-father-parent-1-and-parent-2

What genocide?

You’d need proof of dehumanization.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-15/california-nightmare-over-half-people-living-state-wish-they-could-leave

K-shift.

But you get the politicians you voted for, for years.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-14/socialized-healthcare-reality-exposed-30000-dead-due-record-long-hospital-waiting

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-15/if-socialism-so-good-why-are-people-moving-away

People evading responsibility, including marriage.

Socialists can’t run a business, a church or a creepy hybrid of both.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-06/no-free-lunch-panera-shutters-socialist-pay-what-you-want-restaurant

You can put security guards at a socialist cafe or walls at Rowling’s mansion property, but don’t you dare guard the borders of the country!

Why do security guards exist if everyone can be trusted?

Feminine brain, youthful brain

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/womens-metabolic-brain-age-around-three-years-younger-mens-180971425/

Predictable.

“New research suggests that women’s brains stay energized well into old age, making their brains appear about three years younger than men’s of the same chronological age.”

Given

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/estrogen-boosts-brainpower-actually/

Linked in first:

https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/01/29/1815917116

Men didn’t evolve to live long, so it isn’t so much remarkable that women live longer with healthier brains but men,  to be competitive with other men in youth and war, age terribly simply because so few would survive there’s no evolutionary pressure.

Some tough choices ahead for the cooties crowd.

Stick to imaginary phantasms of 20th century masculine superiority solely intended to run up credit debt or actually be healthier.

Here comes the academese:

“Researchers remain uncertain why such metabolic differences exist”

EVOLUTION.

“It’s not that women’s brains seem to age slower than men’s,”

Literally is.
Watch the twist.

“Rather, it seems that women’s brains start off at a younger age when they reach adulthood, and they keep that throughout the remainder of their adulthood, basically buying them a few extra years.”

Not how it works. At all.

It’s like saying you start a race at the finish line, words have meanings.

If they’ve reached adulthood, they’ve reached adulthood. You can’t change the meaning to be quantum. Women mature faster (partially from earlier puberty and slower, longer sum development time because of that) and go on to metabolically age better because testosterone is known to burn out the system.

Gradual puberty + lower T = good for long-term brain health.

aka Not women’s fault. Help your fellow men. Maybe that explains why celibates like Tesla (who, let’s face it, probably didn’t masturbate), who kept their T-levels low as a result, lived longer and stayed lucid. Maybe that’s why monks live longer too, staying sharp. Male chastity has observable benefits.

The autobiographies of genius seem to evidence longer average puberty, too. The sensitive kid who’s a later bloomer?

The Victorians called masturbation self-abuse because the compulsion/addiction would tend to be co-morbid with other mental problems, including depression. How many porn addicts are depressed?

And what do they do to self-soothe because (someone) tells them it’s unanimously ‘good for you’?

Even nuns tend to live longer which does point to lower testosterone being a pre-requisite for a long life, neatly explaining why male levels gradually lower. It isn’t like evolution is picking on men. Aggressive animals have shorter lifespans across species. This is the price of being the protector/provider sex.

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/men-too-much-testosterone-linked-to-shorter-lifespan-112213

“Overall, men with circulating testosterone levels between 9.8 to 15.8 nmol/L range tended to live the longest.”

Men are entitled to know what their healthy levels should be, study them!

Men age faster cognitively, he’s like a magician trying to switch your attention onto women when there’s a medical problem with men.
Assuming they want to live long and prosper.

Like, sorry, if that’s a sexist assumption.

“Previous studies have found that aging women often exhibit stronger reasoning, memory and problem-solving skills than males of the same age. But it’s unclear whether this trend is related specifically to metabolism or to a different aspect of brain function.”

Hormonal interaction.

“This might mean women are a little bit more resilient to certain aspects of brain aging in general, but it could also introduce certain vulnerabilities,”

Lying liar. Not even one example? How can you try to spin a youthful brain as a bad thing?

Women aren’t so much MORE resilient (although oestrogen helps) but men are MORE fragile.

HELP THEM.

“Having a younger brain for longer could make the brain more vulnerable to certain things as well.”

Still no mention of men? This isn’t a woman’s issue, there’s nothing new here as stated, women already perform better as a known overall finding*, he totally ignores what men need because it involves admitting they aren’t the best at something….

These arrogant men are sex traitors. Their ego won’t let them admit men need help. So have fun with higher neurodegeneration risk because one guy won’t admit he’s not #1 at everything.

Men are not the control group, it’s the mean between both groups.

Basic category error and erroneous maths.

Hubris is a deadly sin. Treating male ill-health like it’s normal will literally kill men.

OT but relevant:

If we took men as the control, the shorter male lifespan is not only normal but hinted at being desirable, you don’t want to change the norm, with women being unusually longer-lived (greater distance from norm). Actually, the average is between the groups, again. The difference from the norm is smaller, easier to broach and bring those below it up to speed.

*Because unlike IQ studies, they can’t conveniently ‘exclude’ the left-side of the male bell curve to skew their findings dishonestly. This happens after they sample from middle-class academia pupils largely from suburban populations, a huge bias/filter itself.

Sure, throw other men under the bus and blame women for biology. Sexism both ways!

Reminder:

Right-wingers are different

It’s that time of year for a study-dump. Read until the end.

Better-looking (on AVERAGE):
https://sputniknews.com/viral/201801311061239797-physically-attractive-people-right-wing/

“Good-looking individuals are more likely to have right-wing political views than less physically attractive people, according to a university study.
The authors of the report, Rolfe D. Peterson from the US Susquehanna University and Carl L. Palmer from the Illinois State University, examined the connection between physical attractiveness and political beliefs, applying multiple surveys measuring people’s attractiveness.
“More attractive individuals are more politically efficacious than their peers and more likely to identify as conservative and Republican than less physically attractive citizens of comparable demographic backgrounds,” the report read.”

Comparable demographic background, an important control.

Better-looking again:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences/article/effects-of-physical-attractiveness-on-political-beliefs/D5214D0CAE37EE5947B7BF29762547EE
PDF at: https://about.illinoisstate.edu/clpalme/Documents/Peterson%20Palmer%20The%20Effects%20of%20Physical%20Attractiveness%20on%20Political%20Attitudes.pdf

“Controlling for socioeconomic status, we find that more attractive individuals are more likely to report higher levels of political efficacy, identify as conservative, and identify as Republican.”

SES control is important.

Better-looking:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272716302201

“Politicians on the right look more beautiful in Europe, the U.S. and Australia.”

How to tell May isn’t really right-wing.

They should also study disease load (emphasizing STDs, which do affect appearance) compared to partisanship.

Support meritocracy, oppose the cult of equalism:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597814000223

“Higher self-perceived attractiveness (SPA) increased support for inequality.”

Self-perceived, relative.

Have a ‘look’:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886916312028

“The political sympathies of scholars can be accurately assessed from photographs.”
“In contrast to politicians, Right-leaning scholars were not more attractive.”

The scholars haven’t hired image consultants.

What, do you think a man buys an expensive suit just for the suit?

“Right-leaning scholars were better groomed.
Controlling for grooming, Left-leaning scholars were more attractive”

This is supposed to be looking at genetic attractiveness, true attractiveness, not clothing/haircare/make-up?
Okay, I’ll let them have that one. They’re better at faking it, a trait of narcissism.

Less likely to cheat when expected to cooperate:
https://reason.com/blog/2014/07/22/socialists-are-cheaters-says-new-study

Neurologically different:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3092984/

“Political Orientations Are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults”
We found that greater liberalism was associated with increased gray matter volume in the anterior cingulate cortex, whereas greater conservatism was associated with increased volume of the right amygdala.”

So they’re more gender neutral in the brain?
https://www.webmd.com/brain/news/20050121/intelligence-may-be-gray-white-matter#1
Because the same IQ can still be produced by structural differences between the sexes.

“Researchers found major differences in the amount of gray and white matter in the brains of men and women of the same intelligence, suggesting that men and women may derive their intelligence in different ways.”

“”These findings suggest that human evolution has created two different types of brains designed for equally intelligent behavior,” says researcher Richard Haier, professor of psychology at the University of California, Irvine, in a news release. “In addition, by pinpointing these gender-based intelligence areas, the study has the potential to aid research on dementia and other cognitive impairment diseases in the brain”

Again, the same IQ score.

SAME.

Man Card isn’t a MENSA card, accomplish something.

Sexual dimorphism didn’t stop at the neck.

But white matter is generally more important for HIGH IQ:
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/412678/brain-images-reveal-the-secret-to-higher-iq/
White matter could only be imaged recently.

“They found a strong correlation between the integrity of the white matter and performance on a standard IQ test.”

Although grey matter can matter too, white matter cannot be denied EITHER:
https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article/17/9/2163/272753

Positive relationships were found between FSIQ and intracranial gray and white matter but not cerebrospinal fluid volumes. Significant associations with cortical thickness were evident bilaterally in prefrontal (Brodmann’s areas [BAs] 10/11, 47)

IQ so real you can scan someone’s brain, almost.

and posterior temporal cortices (BA 36/37) and proximal regions.

Sex influenced regional relationships;

Before any sexist bitch goes to twist this, different does not mean inferior. This is a study of intelligence, NOT stupidity.

You can’t prove a negative and individuals are not groups?

The obvious pointed out? Okay, let’s continue.

women showed correlations in prefrontal and temporal association cortices, whereas men exhibited correlations primarily in temporal–occipital association cortices.

K.

An idiot reading that would assume women are smarter, prefrontal doesn’t always mean smarter, necessarily, it’s just a group-level skew of structural difference. However, it does explain the higher female average.

Again, average.

In healthy adults,

important distinction, many brain studies are conducted on the undeveloped (teens) or pathologies

neither of which generalize to a HEALTHY, ADULT population

[sorry for the smart people tuning in, idiots twist what I type]

greater intelligence is associated with larger intracranial gray matter and to a lesser extent with white matter.

Plot twist: both matter.

Almost like we evolved.

Variations in prefrontal and posterior temporal cortical thickness are particularly linked with intellectual ability.

PF – registered as female strength, generally.
PT – registered as male and female strengths, generally.

This isn’t better/worse, it’s apples/oranges.

Even race overwhelms sex as a confound in IQ (so does class, education etc).

Sex moderates regional relationships that may index dimorphisms in cognitive abilities, overall processing strategies, or differences in structural organization.”

Trans. sex differences real yo.

Overall, key word.

Moderates, may index, differences. As in, these processes still occur but like a road trip, each take different paths different enough to map but not distinct enough to be unrecognizable.

Reminder

Estrogen, which men also NATURALLY produce, also boosts brainpower.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/estrogen-boosts-brainpower-actually/
Study here but my commentary explains it:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4104582/
Whereas, everyone knows, testosterone (which women also produce) correlates to violence.
Nothing is all-good, all-bad in hormones.
“A moment of silence for all the women in history who married dumber men.”

They should study political economic wing and compare it to natural/un-supplemented hormone levels.
As in, a man who ‘needs’ steroids for vanity is less of a man.

They should also look at whether men going onto steroids drop in IQ score because it competes with their organic estrogen that makes them handle stressors better.

[Update: after checking, they did. Here it is.]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3608708/

“long-term high-dose AAS exposure may cause cognitive deficits, notably in visuospatial memory.”

“These results remained stable in sensitivity analyses addressing potential confounding factors.”
The dumb jock stereotype is true!

WAIT.

It gets better!

Actually, it causes brain damage!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25986964
This is amazing!


Fake masculinity is really bad for men. You can’t cheat code becoming a man.

CONCLUSIONS:

Long-term AAS use is associated with right amygdala enlargement and reduced right amygdala rsFC with brain areas involved in cognitive control and spatial memory, which could contribute to the psychiatric effects and cognitive dysfunction associated with AAS use.

The MRS abnormalities we detected could reflect enhanced glutamate turnover and increased vulnerability to neurotoxic or neurodegenerative processes, which could contribute to AAS-associated cognitive dysfunction.

Now the right amygdala enlargement sounds like the natural conservative difference but understand it’s rooted, not in experience and genuine masculine virtue, but chemical dependence. Without the drugs, it’ll shrink right back and possibly atrophy.

This would be like congratulating a tall guy who took HGH for his superior genetics. No. It’s a superficial, fake result.

The cognitive control is impaired, that’s regression. The meat head stereotype is true, biologically. Useless.

I wonder how many male suicides were on steroids? Both groups happen to be middle-aged men in fear of the Wall.

Whatever the details, it makes them biologically vulnerable compared to their natural state, the opposite of fitness.

Ironically, they’re more vulnerable to microplastics and xenoestrogens. 

To further screw the point in… that brain region explicitly mentioned?

Right amygdala rsFC study:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3997418/
“In high HA scorers, we also observed stronger right amygdala rsFC with the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), which is implicated in negative affect regulation.”
It’s a girly brain thing to do with harm avoidance. [aka common sense]
“may represent a vulnerability marker for sensitivity to stress and anxiety (disorders).”
So the meat head with reduced volume (therefore not conservative*) is dumber, senses dulled by drugs and more likely to fail to get the brain signals to avoid trouble. Sounds like a future in handcuffs. They can’t perceive danger nor regulate negative emotions like anger or shame after rejection. Basically, they’re future chimp-outs waiting to happen, whatever their race**. Less able to CONTROL emotions, the broflakes.***

Hair-trigger temper calling out people for looking at him.

The guy who picks on people but never actually expects to get hit.

Will grab a woman and be shocked she slaps him. That’s the one.

*because, again “greater conservatism was associated with increased volume of the right amygdala.”

[as referenced above]

yet they have less?

So steroids make men more left wing. It isn’t the correct area and type to be considered otherwise.

ISN’T SCIENCE FUN, FELLOW RED PILLS.

ACCEPTING FINDINGS EVEN WHEN WE DON’T LIKE THEM, BRO.

My guess is it messes with their sexual reward system and produces impotence, porn addiction, dissatisfaction.

https://www.simplymedsonline.co.uk/blog/how-does-anabolic-steroid-use-affect-erectile-function/

Steroids do cause impotence (PC term is ED). Does it lower sperm count?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744441/

DING DING DING WE HAVE A WINNER.

“Anabolic steroids abuse and male infertility”

I am good at this.

“Infertility is defined by the WHO as the failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse and a male factor is present in up to 50 % of all infertile couples. Several conditions may be related to male infertility.

Substance abuse, including AAS, is commonly associated to transient or persistent impairment on male reproductive function, through different pathways. Herein, a brief overview on AAS is offered. Steroids biochemistry, patterns of use, physiological and clinical issues are enlightened. A further review about fertility outcomes among male AAS abusers is also presented, including the classic reports on transient anabolic steroid-induced hypogonadism (ASIH), and the more recent experimental reports on structural and genetic sperm damage.”

hypogonadism = tiny balls

“In layman’s terms, it is sometimes called interrupted stage 1 puberty”

You’d have to be a moron already to think supplementing that shit makes you manly.

Nice muscles bro, shame you hit rewind on puberty!

They impair their body’s ability to naturally produce testosterone in future…. idiots.

Darwin Award category?

Big Pharma’s best customer? Like Israel’s Viagra use. Israel and America, top consumers.

https://www.haaretz.com/life/MAGAZINE-israeli-porn-is-booming-and-the-industry-insists-it-s-about-more-than-just-sex-1.5472336

(((Coincidence)))

**Logically we should restrict steroid use to lower the crime rate. We can’t have gorilla people chimping out and blaming da drugs.

***There are few things less masculine than a man who throws tantrums because Hulk RAGE entitlement. The mantrum has neurological correlates, as we can see.

As for the ACC lefty brain finding:

https://www.neuroscientificallychallenged.com/blog//know-your-brain-cingulate-cortex

..I didn’t forget.

“Through these connections, the ACC is thought to be involved with a number of functions related to emotion including the regulation of overall affect, assigning emotions to internal and external stimuli, and making vocalizations associated with the expression of states or desires.

No comment.

The ACC also seems to contribute to the regulation of autonomic and endocrine responses, pain perception, and the selection and initiation of motor movements. Additionally, there are other areas of the ACC that are involved in various aspects of cognition ranging from decision-making to the management of social behavior.”

And about sexual potency….

I order these for a reason.

Right-wingers more sexually satisfied:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/8943/study-conservatives-have-better-sex-lives-liberals-amanda-prestigiacomo

“A new YouGov survey, which asked over 19,000 participants from the UK, France, Germany, Sweden and Denmark about both their politics and their sex lives, has found conservatives to be happier in the bedroom than liberals, with those identifying as “very right-wing” found to be the happiest.”

So much for the benefits of slutting. Muh experience. Yes, experiencing a burning sensation.

If you want a better sex life, don’t be a manwhore.
Chastity is a virtue. Less stress when single, hot sex when married.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/02/right-wing-people-more-likely-to-be-happier-with-their-sex-lives/

Sluts reee.

I deserve an Ig Nobel for all this connection-making. It could save the West.

https://ifstudies.org/blog/baby-bust-fertility-is-declining-the-most-among-minority-women

While I’m putting out fires imagined by shrill men.

Click through.

BAFFLED, JENKINS!

The need for genius

“If there was a sense of real crisis, and urgent sense of need, there might emerge a better and more wide-spread ‘search process’ for discovering geniuses: a more effective way of unearthing more individuals from the declining pool of potential geniuses and giving them a better chance of coming-through to a position where they might attain the best work of which they were capable – and then taking some notice of it.”

http://geniusfamine.blogspot.com/

Well, if you ignore half the white population, good luck with that.

The Head Girl thing shows they haven’t observed how common male conformity is; swearing, listening to rap, race-mixing, sexual experimentation, porn addiction, pot smoking, playing sports, binge drinking, clubbing, expensive cars, credit card debt on lad’s holidays… and the ultimate example of conformity, the military.

Celebrity is the opposite of intelligence, the plebs need someone to feel superior to.

They want dumbed-down culture, because they are mediocre.

Short poppies don’t want to see tall ones. That is ‘equality’ culture, geniuses are shorter by a head and kept poor. They want to reward the people worse than them, moral decay and dysgenics.

They assume the smart people will have to bail them out when things get bad, because they’re owed by patriotism or something. Otherwise, they push the smart ones into the dirt and try to destroy them, usually by poverty.

Low culture is intentional, to keep the tall poppies smothered.

Who owns the arts, do men own the theatres, music studios, film studios  – or women?

Men screwing other men. Crony capitalism. Sex traitors. Class warfare.

What do those men say? Blame the women, never breed!

Allowing their children to outcompete your dead genetics.

Darwin warned us.

Don’t marry because all those Jews* in sitcoms were miserable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everybody_Loves_Raymond

*In sitcoms written by Jews, married ones.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Rosenthal

Huh, why is the birth rate dropping and women need to earn their own rent?

Blame the women, they won’t go on welfare! Those entitled bitches! Stealing our jobs!

Whatever you do, never blame yourself…. for your own actions and their consequences.

(Logically, for every man going MGTOW and refusing to marry, that’s one woman who cannot, whatever her attitude to family formation. It’s stealing the jobs of wife, mother and housewife. They’re scared of the “risk”, because you know, masculine men can’t stand risks. Pass the soy.)

Tall women live longer than short ones

https://www.upi.com/amp/Health_News/2019/01/22/Study-Body-size-may-influence-longevity-in-women-but-not-in-men/6731548193467/

And from what I know previously, short men tend to outlive very tall ones, unsure about medium to slightly tall height.

The thin finding is ‘duh’ but the height one is surprising.

I guess it’s genetic?

Maybe leg men know best.

I’d like to see a more detailed study comparing within and between race but I won’t hold my breath.

Why women want artificial wombs and men shouldn’t

(ALL) Women:

  1. don’t have to give birth
  2. don’t have to give birth
  3. DON’T HAVE TO GIVE BIRTH

Other reasons? Really? Watch a few pregnancy horror story videos on Youtube and come back.

At least…. five.

Like, if you hated women, the last thing you should want is this technology.

Women would lionize the inventor more than the second coming of Jesus.

Fine, here is a short list of others. A short list off the top of my head.

  1. no vaginal tearing
  2. no recovery period (like, a year between babies, seriously)
  3. countless babies, no cap!
  4. 9 SOLID MONTHS of free time
  5. time to prepare for bubba and make money to save for its rearing, the magical symphony of compound interest in a college fund
  6. no downtime of suffering in pregnancy with weird malaise or vomiting randomly
  7. no weird pains or bodily functions like wetting yourself
  8. no humiliating exams involving instruments of torture
  9. or the phrase “anally palpate”
  10. no need for scary word blood tests
  11. or gigantic needles inserted into your cervix
  12. no need for brain-damaging fetal ultrasounds
  13. nobody blaming you for defects
  14. nobody blaming you for miscarriage or conception issues
  15. nobody judging the food you eat
  16. or how much you drink
  17. or if you smoke
  18. or if you venture anything moderately approaching effort in heavy pregnancy
  19. no bitchy nurses
  20. no post-partum heavy bleeding
  21. no loss of dignity
  22. no shitting yourself in semi-public (related)
  23. no husband stitch
  24. no episiotomies, period
  25. btw, no periods ever again because you don’t need the default one to be functional
  26. so let’s just remove that at adulthood once you look sexy
  27. and boom, no need for contraception that messes with your head
  28. sweet condom free sex for wives, no Catholic dread
  29. child support is no longer an issue, only men who want kids can have them
  30. only men with good genetics pass the screening process for a healthy pregnancy
  31. then there’s the price, keeping out the lazy who don’t understand saving money (the high time preference)
  32. baby can’t kill you, kinda big
  33. no C-section mortality
  34. no direct grief over miscarriage, it isn’t connected to you, you can just try again
  35. no stillbirth
  36. work as many years as you like, the pod is still factory fresh when you need it
  37. we can teach the baby in the pod all the things we want to teach it e.g. our voice
  38. and none of the things we don’t e.g. our swearing
  39. equal input from father thanks to technology e.g. teaching it his voice
  40. make as much money as you like and you can literally repopulate the planet
  41. stupid people can’t breed
  42. annoying people can’t find anyone to breed with them (two parents still needed to raise)
  43. no such thing as donor eggs/sperm because why not just grow your own with complete control?
  44. no random hair loss – or hair growth
  45. no sagging from breastfeeding because I think they’ll have a machine for that, by that point
  46. no needing extra calories, no pregnancy fat
  47. no stretch marks or scars or mask of pregnancy
  48. no interrupted sex life, no excuse for wandering husband
  49. longer gestation doesn’t kill the mother, humanity gets smarter
  50. humanity gets more attractive because who’d buy a synthetic womb to make an uggo?

Is fifty enough?

Hug your mother.

MEANWHILE, IN MALE DYSTOPIA.

Misogynistic men:

  1. no excuse to keep women at home barefoot, she isn’t pregnant
  2. nothing to distract them from your personality
  3. the best of any technology goes to the rich, producing a eugenic arms race
  4. you can’t just buy eggs, women suddenly values theirs
  5. the only donor eggs are low quality or blanks, supply/demand
  6. there’s obviously an IQ test because society is clearly advanced
  7. hope you don’t have a criminal record
  8. religion has lost a major bargaining chip
  9. women are valuing fathers who spend time with the children, preventing you from having endless ones
  10. people judge you for making one alone, knowing their outcomes can be cruel
  11. it is socially accepted breeding is something you must develop and earn
  12. lazy men need not apply, why marry them?
  13. the slutty women who wanted a child support check or just a baby no longer need men
  14. genetic engineering practiced on female gametes prevents such men from entering on grounds of uncivilized personality alleles (or, as we say, anti-social)
  15. robots do most work at this point in time, most male labour is extinct, as is the concept of a Third World
  16. there are far fewer men in the population than women, since mothers are still the primary caregiver
  17. with each passing generation, less unpleasantness spontaneously emerges in the human genome
  18. men who have a pod baby are legally required to raise it (no nannies)
  19. nannies went extinct because women saved money for their child before having one, allowing them to raise it personally, as studies indicate is healthier
  20. bonus, husband can’t cheat with non-existent nanny
  21. perfect microbiome, the son is healthier than the father
  22. and better looking as a result of perfect conception and gestation, you couldn’t compete socially with younger men
  23. birth is a joyous event for women, who can simply be injected with bonding chemicals
  24. as can men, meaning no man is a deadbeat ever again
  25. good luck evading responsibility if you change your mind, since it’s as deliberate a process as buying a house
  26. pod baby will sue if you abandon it, since we currently prosecute people who abuse animals they bought
  27. no tricking more attractive women into bearing your child or forcing them to marry you because of it
  28. rapists don’t get the one thing they want, access to a woman’s genetic material, no rape babies or abortions
  29. you know that shit counts under property, right? Women own their children still and only breed with a man they find suitable for marriage.
  30. no way to accidentally-on-purpose kill a baby if you hate its mother, pushing her down the stairs will not work.

There’s just thirty.

It is comforting to know we live in a quiet lull of culling forces and none of our ancestors lived in a time of so many stupid people and nor will many of our descendants.

I could go on. Womb envy is real.

Go ahead, gentlemen. Go right ahead.