There’s no such thing as an “incel”

Dear Americans who can’t English

Celibacy is voluntary, that’s the point of it. It’s always a choice, that’s baked into the definition.
There’s also no such thing because nobody is entitled to sex.
It’s the new Forever Alone meme, mutated into a whiny complaint. They tell people how desperate they are for any wet hole (but no homo because beggars can also be choosers) and wonder why nobody is into that.
This term is a nonsense, an oxymoron to deny reality of their situation and make out it’s some new tumblrism identity, to feel special about themselves. You’re just single in a dry spell, get over yourself. Unless you’re married, you have no conjugal rights.
If the feminists started claiming this and demanding the guy from the Notebook slept with them, they’d dogpile on laughing at them and saying it’s the new self-descriptor of the cat lady who marries herself. Essentially you’re so r-type you’re asking for AA with sex. Like free brothels. Can you not find enough octopus porn to slake your postmodern lusts? And why should any man or woman (it could be either, both have orifices) serve you, if you don’t want to marry them? What kind of degeneracy is this?

TLDR: Incels advocate sex slavery, wonder why unloved. Same guys to openly call women ‘females’ and wonder why nobody wants to spread their genetics and the guys who spend all their time bitching like women and wonder why only masculine feminists are interested in them.

If either sex became state prostitutes, it would be men. Guess you can’t turn down any of those feminists or lard-asses at the bar. And you’ll have to pretend to like it.

Celibacy is also an oath, something you are bound to by conditions or principles and religious. Atheists cannot be celibate.
Someone who has engaged in premarital sex/fornication cannot be celibate, it relates to virginity. A period of celibacy is a misnomer, unless you mean the condition will be met by marriage (they never mean this). They want physical intimacy without the emotional (so Millennial it hurts). Words have meanings and while you’re complaining that feminists misappropriate terms like gender or problematic, maybe crack open the dictionary on the terms you use as well.
Now. Who wants to help me off this high horse?

Brought to you by People Who Know What Words Mean.

Get someone to buy you a dictionary for Christmas…. oh wait.

p.s. Inb4 other men are getting laid. Other ‘males’ and mostly ghetto trash. Also doesn’t make it right. On the subject, today’s youth have less sex than their parents so science says you’re wrong.

Hook-up culture and promiscuity bad for psychiatric health

The “Well, duh” brand of science.

http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/casualsex.htm
h/t AC

“There’s always been a question about which one is the cause and which is the effect. This study provides evidence that poor mental health can lead to casual sex, but also that casual sex leads to additional declines in mental health.”

Age of first sex (what a pedophilic name that is) is a great marker for mental illness later in life, including risk of suicide. Yes, it very much includes abuse victims. Both count as social harm and personal damage.

Sex is an easy, natural high. Self-medication aside, the disturbance in the psyche caused by yet-more unstable chemicals, self-produced or not, would cause a downward spiral. It’s known as a self-destructive behaviour because there is no limit. It’s about dopamine more than serotonin, a close second. They are training their brain for the worst possible mechanisms, making it weaker, more capricious and brittle. These are the rats who would always push the dopamine lever, forsaking any food, until they die. It is an insane behaviour and at minimum, betrays a form of self-loathing which calls their willing consent into question. At least, medication must be regular and in this case it poses other health risks from the fact sexual activity is not (masturbation is lesser stimulus and may even out as a basic relief depending on timing). Many of them are on SSRIs, artificially boosting their body’s endorphins and continue to seek out more. It should be seen as self-harm, like cutting. They cannot appreciate the little things, which compounds the issue, like a hot-sauce addict who calls any food less spicy ‘bland’. Trendy, foreign food would also trigger dopamine release i.e. foodies are self-medicating. If placed on any dietary restriction, however minor, the novelty ‘buzz’ of food would wear off and they’d stop caring about it. Rations would infuriate and they queue for hours for a mediocre but fashionable dish. Fashions become insane because bored, rich people buy them. Fashions are casual because they are lazy and the psychology needs to be comfortable in looser clothing, compared to a minimal symbol of authority like a tie. They begin to loathe the sex they crave, from a feeling of entitlement, that ‘everybody belongs to everybody else’ and rejection becomes rage-inducting to them as narcissists.

There is no such thing as sex addiction because it’s simply more convenient for them than a dopamine drip (this would save the Government money in the long run and prevent their use as vectors of disease, including memetic transmission). However, sex is addictive. It’s a subtle distinction that must be made as they continue to plummet for the sake of a never-ending hunger, that is irrational and divorced from reality (read: psychotic). Unlike actual drugs, they burn out their body’s own production, which often leads them to begin supplementing with drugs to plug the deficit they feel, from party highs to mixing things and harder stuff. Escalation is the addiction and the sex itself is more a behavioural addiction that spirals into other habits, they do a similar thing with alcohol and chili peppers.

The Nazi undercut sported by hipsters is a symbol of victory over the ideology. It is also convenient to care for and less likely to pick up bugs from their indiscretions.

Street music discusses their favourite things: all hedonic but the treadmill never slows.

What is sexual coercion? (hint: not consensual)

It’s a positive sign when the sluts and manwhores kvetch over this information getting out.

It’s a great way of outing rapists, like the vegan test. Just discuss rape by fraud and out pop the rapists.

Oddly they’ll talk about male rape as a red herring, when men are probably coerced as much as women based on porn myths i.e. men always want it.

These are your rights. Your right to personal sovereignty, physical power over your own body. They don’t want potential victims to know their rights.

Like, there’s nothing wrong with being a consumer, but purchasing stolen goods is still illegal. Fraud is always possible.

http://www.consented.ca/consent/coercion/
“It’s not that they did not say “no,” but that they could not say “no.””
People will happily admit duress is wrong, but make it something physical, than written… suddenly they argue it’s ‘complicated’ – no.

http://www.loveisrespect.org/content/what-sexual-coercion/

Or you could stop blaming the victim and simply bring back seduction law, which prevented some of the lesser-known forms of rape. (Because consent needs to be fully, truthfully informed).

Seduction is a form of abusive manipulation. It’s sick that society uses the term to mean something admirable.

Seduction is illegal under English common law. Simply enforce it.
Most of the American system is based on it too. Sinatra was charged with it.

The evolution of facial beauty, including the lips

They always study women for these things in general, it’s dumb.

Beauty is not sexy, sexy is not beauty. Sexy is Hollywood culture and porn, but I repeat myself. Beauty is sexual dimorphism (extremes into their own sex, not a cross-breed), fertility and evolution. ‘Male beauty’ standards would wound too many egos. At least they can go to the gym for below the neck stuff, and you’ve seen the butthurt on height when it’s linked to healthier babies from superior childhood nutrition and hormone balance, as well as genetics.

Many factors here.

http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/366/1571/1638

http://evolutionbioc334.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/evolution-of-lips.html

There is a hard limit on lip thickness based on the vermillion border and African lips need a masculine high-T jawline to hold the structure’s area size and weight, which neutralises the ‘gain’. They signal sexual maturity of the other lips, that is all. Jolie inherited hers from her father, and this is more common than via the mother, so it isn’t actually specific to women but men (like better nails and eyelashes, it’s unusual in women). A little plumper than her childhood ratio is an individual cue to fertility, not the supernormal exaggeration of cosmetic filler.

Women with a larger mouth require more filler to achieve the same fullness.

African lips also age terribly and sun burn worse. The wrinkles are aging and with tissue loss (aging), sagginess kicks in really quick (pillow lips, stretched natural skin container for artificial material).

Evolutionally, anyone who survived the Ice Age couldn’t lose more moisture than was absolutely necessary. As a mucous membrane, the lips require harsh upkeep and lose a lot of water as well as heat, to keep warm.

A small selection pressure.

marquardt_mask_small-lips-rosebud-mouth

This is the FEMME Marquardt beauty mask you never actually see, because they don’t use it.
The androgynous morphed male-female one is commonly used all over the place to brainwash us.
On the right is the same face by mathematics, with the angles smoothed into a skin-like surface using the neutral colour grey, as artistic midtone. THAT is the most objective female beauty standard.

Look at the area covered by that mouth. It’s a rosebud mouth, tiny BUT ALSO full.
Taut and youthful, but sexy, and not sagging.

Area covered is genetic, based on the width of the mouth opening, fullness by side profile is hormonal. Note the pronounced Cupid’s bow.

Science doesn’t give a fuck about your feelings.

Examples from Old Hollywood

merle-oberon-1933-oval-face

vivien_young-hair-up

hedy-lamarr-young

grace-kelly-doll-angle

grace-kelly-beauty

Maximum area for beauty

Scientists still complain and explain away the clitoris

It isn’t a vestige, it’s more developed than the penis. Look it up.
Not everything is about your dick. Really.

Think of the stereotype of trolling - white straight male aka Patriarchy. Did they appropriate the term?
http://bigthink.com/philip-perry/researchers-reveal-an-evolutionary-basis-for-the-female-orgasm

So jealous.
I’ve spoken to plenty of men with heavy jealousy over not having one, it’s silly. It’s almost as bad as womb envy.

There’s no need for the male orgasm either, it certainly isn’t needed to finish or impregnate. Women aren’t rushing to say it’s purely about them, get over yourself. Feminists have a valid point on this topic, it’s essentially saying our biology is an accident although we were here first. Biologically.

“From here, Wagner and colleagues deduced that the female orgasm must have been an important part of reproduction in early humans. Before spontaneous ovulation, the human clitoris may have been placed inside the vagina”

WTF face

I am embarrassed on their behalf. For them. It’s a system, light up one, other can be too. Without direct contact. Bear in mind, most of it’s still internal – wrapped around the vagina. We haz MRIs, guys.
Naturally according to Darwin there is ALWAYS a biological reason aka the purpose of biology.
You don’t get to assume there isn’t and work from there, evolution is established. You need to prove there ISN’T. Otherwise, reject male orgasms too. Sounds kinda insulting, huh? Maybe your wife only says she doesn’t believe in them too?

The natural reason, the obvious answer?
Female mate choice. Like basically all the social species. Not male. The woman has the choice, same as now.
Also known as the theory of Sexual Selection.
Shocking, I know.
It rewards women prior to the carrying and dying in childbirth thing. That’s why the clitoris, fools.

If anything, the male orgasm is a vestige of the female, based on the way Y chromosomes shape development of the fetus from female. But hey, why science, huh?

It also tops up the hormone levels in the reproductive system just in time for the sperm to arrive.

Obvious timing is obvious.

Why can’t slutty men find non-slutty wives?

It’s the big question, isn’t it?

Manwhores complaining about not finding a ‘good’ wife after admitting/bragging they can’t keep it in their pants?

teadrinking sipping pretentious sarcastic bitch mmhmm not my problem lol

World’s biggest mystery.

You should totally start a male supremacy cult based on it. That’ll get all the babes.

You deserve a good woman, right? Hey, when you went psycho manipulator on those other women, it was funny! It wasn’t abuse! Take a joke! You’ll brag forever about how many women you ruined and wonder why only the broken ones are attracted to that.

Yes, it’s all pesky woman’s fault.

Thanks to birth control, today’s degenerates are tomorrow’s genetic suicides.

For the rest of us, there’s matched pairs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assortative_mating#In_humans

Outside of physical appearance, assortative mating in humans occurs over a wide array of traits. These include socio-economic status, educational level, various attitudes (religious, political, racial and ethnic), personality, psychological traits and mental disorders…

If only the ugly sluts are attracted to you… guess what.

joker DC smile smirk evil grin lol haha

Have it All is a lie you purchased instead of long-term happiness. Now you’re a bachelor, the male spinster. You wanted a reputation, it’s a beacon, a loud and clear signal for one type to come and another to run away. Maybe your red pill should be a cyanide cap.

inspired by

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/12/28/are-you-new-to-the-manosphere/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/12/28/is-game-or-pick-up-a-con/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/01/23/r-types-want-r-types/

Provision requires fidelity. You fail as a man. You lose. Good day, Sir.