see section 31
They’ll blame children, independent thinkers and vaccine failure. It’s gene therapy, failure doesn’t happen.
Population immunity is based on natural exposure and has never had anything to do with vaccines. Ever. In a century plus of biology. Over a year of exposure, we’re already immune naturally.
most of the Third Wave dead will be the fully vaccinated
go ahead, check
70% of deaths, they say
deaths “larger than peak” from Jan 2021 warned in section 35
section 56 quote “vaccinated, but, nevertheless, not protected against death” that’s how stupid they are, stupid and malicious
and under-50 deaths were minimal, under-60s a little higher, over-70s the only group at-risk, if you remember back to last year, which already feels like a century
They go on “This is NOT the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high”. That makes zero logical sense, either it protects you in reality or doesn’t. The map is not the territory, your model isn’t real.
If it doesn’t work, it doesn’t work. Then by definition, it’s ineffective. The purpose of uptake was prevention, which relies on effectiveness. They’re connected variables, idiot.
Look at the death charts on the right of page 18. The more vaccine, the more death.
I SEE SEAS OF BLUE, YOU CAN HAVE THEM TOO, A GENE THERAPY FOR ME, A GENE THERAPY FOR YOU, AND I THINK TO MYSELF, THIS IS BILL GATES’ WORLD, YES I THINK TO MYSELF, THIS IS BILL GATES’ WORLD…
section 60 is a ray of sunshine
“The widespread transmission of a variant that circumvents vaccine induced and naturally acquired immunity is a realistic possibility.” amusing of you to lump them in
“a large section of the population would be susceptible, whether they’ve been vaccinated or not”
“models here used assume….” a lot of shit, frankly, a lot of bullshit
The models used here assume that the effectiveness of vaccines remains high and they do not consider the impact of new variants of concern. < – neither has been proven, not even a little bit
“62 If a variant of concern were to reduce vaccine effectiveness against severe disease and death” Yes, death would be an unfortunate side effect….
63 “next generation of vaccines” forever and ever, medical martial law
“64 new vaccines will be required in the medium term” thin end of a wedge, this is
“preparation for this REQUIREMENT…..”
66 waning immunity “optimistic assumption” no shit?
Appendix 2 lists, among other things, “vaccine reduction in risk of death” pretty sure it’s still 100% guys
A cheeky footnote reads “16 Very low, low and higher efficacy assumptions for Warwick are based on weighted averages of the two vaccines (30% PF, 70% AZ)” A third effective? Are you joking? And that was the average so the true range went lower.
Note: always check the footnotes, they always hide shit in the footnotes. Nobody ever reads the footnotes, except for me. Because I’m often the cheeky little shit hiding things in them.
It’s strange how Asian areas of the UK are getting ‘new variants’ and ‘outbreaks’ when they have the largest numbers of doctors, who were among the earliest to get the gene therapy…..