Big links on the JQ

Well, the many JQs.
‘fake news’ was a media cover, that wasn’t 2016’s top story, it was ‘fake Jews’
This is as PC and Jew-friendly a page as I can make it, touching on basics for SEO.

1st

race or religion?
http://www.jpost.com/Enviro-Tech/Jews-A-religious-group-people-or-race

‘The belief that Jews constitute a religious, rather than ethnic or racial group in the US and other Western countries is widespread.
“Jewish” was never a category for race in the US Census, Ostrer notes, even though genetic studies “would seem to refute this…
Jewishness at a genetic level can be characterized as a tapestry with the threads represented as shared segments of DNA and no single thread required for composition of the tapestry,” he writes.
Genetic analysis of Jews have high stakes, since being Jewish not only decides who belongs to the family and can take part in Jewish life and earn Israeli citizenship but also “touches on the heart of Zionist claims for a Jewish homeland in Israel.”’

Most known Jews in 21st Century public life?

http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/features/1.601287
“New study finds no evidence that Ashkenazi Jews are the descendants of Khazars, or that subjects in the medieval kingdom converted to Judaism en masse”

Who are they, then?

http://biblehub.com/revelation/3-9.htm
“Look at those who belong to the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews but are liars instead. I will make them come and bow down at your feet, and they will know that I love you.”

What do the Catholics say about this?

https://akacatholic.com/holocaust-inc/
“I for one am sick to death of hearing these make-believe “Jews” wailing incessantly about the horrors of the Holocaust while simultaneously insisting upon a so-called right to exterminate the most innocent of human beings in utero simply because they are inconvenient or may perhaps serve as a testament to the lack of “moral and ethical values” on the part the would-be parents.
The European Jewish Congress is representative of those who choose to self-identify as “Jewish” and yet don’t have the decency to plainly admit that they firmly reject the moral tenets of Judaism.”

Holy buncakes. Hold onto them.
We may be onto something here, chaps.

Naturally, one group corners the market on child sacrifice.

Satanists.

Most recently, ‘fake history’, another cover.
https://www.rt.com/news/380493-iran-israel-fake-history/
“The Israeli PM “not only distorts the realities of today, but also distorts the past — including Jewish scripture.”

Ah, that’s why…
No wonder Palestine is pissed. Regardless, they’re outbreeding Israel. It won’t matter soon who’s right or wrong, but who is left.

What is a Jew?

http://www.science.co.il/Israel-history.php
“The people of Israel (also called the “Jewish People”) trace their origin to Abraham, who established the belief that there is only one God, the creator of the universe (see Torah). Abraham, his son Yitshak (Isaac), and grandson Jacob (Israel), are referred to as the patriarchs of the Israelites.”

Not really, monotheism did exist in various places, this was a brand. A popular one.
Organised, proven (written) monotheism.

So, who are the Ashkenazi?

http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-ashkenazi-jews-dna-diseases-20140909-story.html

Inbred. Extremely.

“All of the Ashkenazi Jews alive today can trace their roots to a group of about 330 people who lived 600 to 800 years ago.
So says a new study in the journal Nature Communications. An international team of scientists sequenced the complete genomes of 128 healthy Ashkenazi Jews and compared each of those sequences with the others, as well as with with the DNA of 26 Flemish people from Belgium. Their analysis allowed them to trace the genetic roots of this population to a founding group in the Middle Ages.”

European. Proven.

“Ashkenazi Jews are those who originated in Eastern Europe.”
“Despite their close ties with Europe, no more than half of their DNA comes from ancient Europeans, the researchers found. Only 46% to 50% of the DNA in the 128 samples originated with the group of people who were also the ancestors of the Flemish people in the study. Those ancient people split off from the ancestors of today’s Middle Easterners more than 20,000 years ago, with a founding group of about 3,500 to 3,900 people, according to the study.
…The rest of the Ashkenazi genome comes from the Middle East, the researchers reported. This founding group “fused” with the European founding group to create a population of 250 to 420 individuals. These people lived 25 to 32 generations ago, and their descendants grew at a rate of 16% to 53% per generation, the researchers calculated.”

Extremely inbred. Why did those few people get kicked out, specifically? Begs Q.

“Today there are more than 10 million Ashkenazi Jews around the world, including 2.8 million in Israel, according to the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.”

What is a ‘fake Jew’ and why should I give a shit?

https://www.gotquestions.org/synagogue-of-Satan.html
“The synagogue of Satan say they are Jews (the people of God), and they persecute those who believe in Jesus the Messiah (the true people of God). In reality, by rejecting the Jewish Messiah, they have renounced their status as “true” Jews, and that is why Jesus calls them “liars.” This distinction between ethnic Jews and faithful Jews is also seen in Romans 9:6 (“Not all who are descended from Israel are Israel”) and Romans 2:28–29 (“For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh. But he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that which is of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter”). By their persecution of the true people of God, these unbelieving Jews had become a synagogue of Satan—a gathering of people who were actually following the devil’s priorities.”

Sounds like signalling.

In modern art.
http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Beware-of-Jews-sign-found-in-haredi-area-of-London-484250

If you’re curious or even bi-curious.
http://whojew.bettersearchllc.com/index.html

Ruin

“In our time all Greece was visited by a dearth of children and generally a decay of population, owing to which the cities were denuded of inhabitants, and a failure of productiveness resulted, though there were no long-continued wars or serious pestilences among us…. For this evil grew upon us rapidly, and without attracting attention, by our men becoming perverted to a passion for show and money and the pleasures of an idle life, and accordingly either not marrying at all, or, if they did marry, refusing to rear the children that were born, or at most one or two out of a great number, for the sake of leaving them well off or bringing them up in extravagant luxury.”
-Polybius, Greek Historian

Anime was punishment for Hiroshima. We killed their city, they killed our birth rates.

When the men become weak and decadent with their pleasures, society falls.
Patriarchy keeps the men in line, to be men.

Pro-abortion children’s propaganda

Children’s Book About Abortion: My ‘Sister Is a Happy Ghost!’

But remember, only the Nazis did propaganda and if you call it Sex Ed it doesn’t count as grooming nor political.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/10/12/show-porn-kids-teach-gender-studies-school-says-bbc-presenter/

How is this not grooming? I dare them to distinguish it in practice.
Asking them to celebrate their own death and robbing them of a childhood free from adult concerns.

thatsjustsickewwtfgrossno

We need the Old Testament God, full of wrath and revenge, Jesus won’t be enough.
They don’t need a peck on the cheek so much as a punch in the face.

>Killing murderers? Rapists? Stoning adulterers? No, evil. Death penalty for crime? Inhumane.
>Killing Sindy’s baby brother? Killing grandpa because his medical bills are expensive for the state? A-OK!

Seriously where is God in this. I’m turning redditfag.
This would’ve been some Monty Python shit in the 70s.

The toddler author was as innocent, and therefore deserving of a voice, as their dead sibling.

Women used to lose most babies to disease and, being humane, grieved the loss. Now we can prevent most disease, they seem to kill them out of spite, because they want a ‘freedom’ to fuck without reproduction, a responsibility attached to the right, when that is the literal purpose of sex. Enjoyment is secondary, even men can ejaculate without orgasm. QED. The body would not allow us to have sex without the possibility of reproduction and you see this with many diseases that prevent enjoyment as conception odds go down, as well as common aging, where men can’t get it up and women can’t do the various things required either. Doctors fix enjoyment complaints by replicating fertility. When we call someone sexy, we refer to perceived nubility.

The soul only exists when it’s convenient to the atheists.

abortedghost

There is a side nobody has pointed out, so it falls to me.
These people don’t know kids. In an age that celebrates self-harm and practically speaking, gives kids extra affection for it, telling a child being dead is fun and desirable and preferable to living with their whore of mother will cause…. suicides. Yup. Once again, liberals causing a social problem and making it worse.

However, I would fully support this book on condition, if the cover was an HD, full-colour picture of a late-term aborted fetus, and they changed the title to Look at what Mommy did to me.

Subtitle: But I’m sure she loves you.

If they can admit that to themselves, go ahead. Look at what you did and look the child in the eye and tell them it was right.

Price listings for the body parts of the supposed non-human homo sapien on the back cover.

Yet we bury miscarriages and still births.

This is why aliens hate us.

Babies aren’t just ‘a clump of cells’, says science

http://uk.businessinsider.com/pregnancy-science-facts-2016-9/

These are findings from child psychology, which includes the latest addition of fetal psychology now imaging tech is sufficient not to harm them (which would be evil immoral).

shrug lol toldyaso fuck you bateman

Whenever a feminist makes a scientific claim, they’re wrong. General rule.

How regular people don’t laugh them out the room when making baseless sweeping statements is the mystery.

Just because you lack evidence for something (humanity) doesn’t make it less true, especially when unstudied, and these people call themselves humanists, to be ironic. If artificial wombs did come in (they won’t), they’d still say it needs A womb to survive, therefore inhuman. But an 83-year old hooked up to a respirator to live has full human rights. They just hate children. Imagine what a spiteful terrible person you have to be to loathe innocence (this applies to men as well). Women destroy innocence by killing it, men destroy it by fucking it. That’s why you see it’s usually women drowning their newborn, and usually men raping it. Sometimes reputation, social damage counts.

When we begin thinking we can make these decisions for other humans in favour of death, death camps become a reality, you just switched out the sign over the gate as if God doesn’t care what you’re doing, but the excuses you give for it.

[However, cutting many people off from the West would kill them, we are under no obligation to provide for healthy adults fully capable of working and farming their own food. This is a medical point, not correcting a bad policy decision that always leads to learned helplessness and bribery corruption. Those people maim and blind their children to make more money as beggars, they don’t care about their own children either and that’s part of the reason they make too many.]

Who is responsible for the creation of a child?

Literally both the parents. No, literally, legally that should be it. Open/Shut. You make them, you pay for them. Not your family, not the State, there is nobody to blame but the two parties contributing DNA. If you’re ‘mature’ enough to be having sex, you’ve accepted the responsibility of parenthood.
Naturally, the problem and burden of carrying/raising is on women, but we have child support to accommodate that biological reality.

Trump’s retarded comments (trying to absolve men for the responsibility of their actions as adults, the same paucity of agency found in feminists) have caused this ricochet of blame shifting. Biology is pretty clear on this topic. If you see male and female as a sexual binary, you can understand this concept of two gametes fusing.

babyresponsibility

First comment: correct. The welfare state stupidly attempted to replace them (enabling those scum).
Second comment: correct. But if he wanted that right, why didn’t he marry the mother?
I would be 100% fine with desertion laws on both sides (we used to call that a marriage though, I guess breach of promise would come in). It would certainly make people think twice before knocking boots with someone emotionally abusive or other. Exception: psychopaths, who can drop the mask once a ring is on the finger (hence the divorce exception for abuse and infidelity, a form of spousal abuse).

Exception to all comments: rape and reproductive abuse (basically, rape). There are terrible people who try to trap others to get sexual access, inheritances, social status etc.

As I posted in the abortion article (that was very popular), if you consent to sex, you consent to the purpose of sex, however low the “risk” (quote marks because conception and pregnancy are natural, not diseases).

Link: Information on and by Margaret Sanger

Comprehensive mine.

http://lifedynamics.com/library#birth-control-review

It makes you wonder whether we must expand the definition of mass murderer, doesn’t it?

Edging closer to the truth is better surely? Right??

Double digit millions and counting, she’s up there with Chairman Mao.

This, in no way, absolves the individuals directly involved. May God have as much mercy as they did…