Penny dropping, Guardian?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/05/wealthy-overseas-parents-london-property-private-school-places

“Overseas”

THOSE FOREIGNERS
COMING OVER HERE
BUYING OUR SCHOOL PLACES
PUSHING RENTS UP

Multiculturalism has more drawbacks than you thought, eh?

Yes, the New Money, mostly Chinese Fake Money, are status-chasing arseholes.

Most importantly, what are you going to do about it?

You can’t do anything. You’re weak. You’re powerless.

Now you know how everyone else has been feeling for – oh – YEARS.

They already stole your kid’s prime Uni placement – because you told them it would be racist to accept your white child.

And they also raised the prices too, because you said “you can’t put a price on a good education” and despite the internet, they took this as a challenge.

America’s Asians are getting counted as minorities despite their grades.

Despite how they have higher class status than whites across the country, so are actually deeply privileged if you control for class and means-test it. Asians also have more money than the natives here in the UK, fact.

Giving them a winning advantage over literally everyone.

It was supposed to be about class but you made it about race. Now you lose like the rest of us.

The future of your race relations problem is yellow, bitch!

The schools get more money for foreign students.

If they actually had to pay their way fairly, also considering how many of their transcripts are lies, a preference for domestic students would surface and you’d still complain!

now what?

A Breakaway Civilization

https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/12/richard-dolan-what-it-is-what-it-means-for-us/

“The legendary physicist, Robert J. Oppenheimer, put the matter succinctly. “There must be no barriers for freedom of inquiry,” wrote the man who led the Manhattan Project. “There is no place for dogma in science. The scientist is free, and must be free to ask any question, to doubt any assertion, to seek for any evidence, to correct any errors.””

If I had a frontpage, that’d be on it.

…”What’s especially galling is that the nature of modern scientific and academic work enable such secrecy to thrive. This belies what they are supposed to do, at least according to the proponents of an open society.

They’re lying to prevent the masses from rioting.

One reason for this unhappy situation is simply how science operates. All scientific and academic inquiry is predicated upon being able to work from open and fully accessible sources. As Oppenheimer understood, scientific research must be available for examination by outsiders. The word for this is falsifiability. It’s an important concept in science. If you lack the chance to “falsify” a proposition – that is, to prove it wrong – then it’s not valid. It may in fact be true, but philosophically speaking, it’s not valid.”

Scientism loves the paywall but hates borders.

Go figure.

Pathological science

http://www.skepticblog.org/2012/03/08/pathological-science/

“Many researchers, even hobbyists and enthusiasts, want for some one result in particular to be true. They’re always on the lookout for data that support their desired conclusion. This is not, by itself, pathological;”

actually experimenter bias is a bias

“but for some who take it to an extreme, it can become that way.”

Money, fame and tenure are on the line, what incentive?

Publish or perish threat?

Your life ruined? Family ashamed? Reputation at stake? What subconscious motive?

Many famous cases of pathological science began as legitimate science, and often the researcher would become distracted by tiny results that suggested an effect when in fact there was none. Belief supplanted objectivity, and the science became pathological science.”

While it shouldn’t be used to deter experimentation, it’s the grand reply to the phrase “established science”, an appeal to authority that doesn’t exist.

e.g.

Smells like social psychology.

Islamophobia, patriarchy (as poltergeist), systemic racism (well, if it’s the system – the evolved system – it can’t be the people in the system), creationism (not that evolution is perfect), global warming by ignore cooling data over decades etc.

Anything heavily political would be pathological science e.g.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/06/20/social-psychology-fraud/

And attitude surveys aren’t science. Seriously. You see an attitude survey, you swerve.

There’s also the problem of finding one thing but claiming another e.g. woman A makes less money than man B, but failing to control for enough other factors and still have a significant gap (above chance) to claim sexism. However, there are sexist pay gaps. Why don’t they study this? Why don’t they follow the proper method? They also apply to men in female-dominant fields too! It’s political because they’d rather lie and do bad science (hurting poor women, ironically) than let men seem like the victims for five minutes!

Pseudoscience is used by self-proclaimed “skeptics” to poison the well against the competition. Team Red will say Team Blue’s work in the same field is “pseudoscience” to boost their chances of getting the finite research grants they compete over. It’s all about the money.

So you’ll find the most successful liars comprise most “celebrity scientists”, the hallmark of scientism (personality cults develop), and when their work is eventually exposed (some Freud, Kinsey not yet, Zimbardo recently) then the world is shocked because echoes don’t pass through Ivory Tower walls. The field knew. It always knew. It hid it.

There’s no such thing as pseudoscience in the sense of a forbidden topic. Distasteful yes, but so what? Do politicians dictate freedom of thought now? No, but they sign grant checks and that’s basically the same thing.

Past a certain level, isn’t commonality of a certain unPC disposition just normal?

Stealing intellectual property

Security issues, et tu?

That is an act of war. That is an invasion. Companies too. They’re the machine in war machine.

If you think that’s nothing, consider these things often have military applications. It doesn’t have to be obvious. Intellectual property is still property and the theft can net a lot of money. It means the R&D costs nothing (to the thief) so the profits are even higher. IP can be worth more than a jewelry heist or bank robbery. Or ten.

https://www.rt.com/news/436849-hackers-stealing-university-data-iran/

Imagine if the West had kept computers and other white technology to ourselves.

Ah, but “diversity is our strength”, isn’t it?

All this multicultural sharing has been so good for us!

We can trust our historic, low IQ bitter enemies because it’s the current year!

War is outlawed!

They have foreign students passing them system details, only way these hacks work.

Scruton, frauds of the University elite

Starts around 14m

Book mentioned:

Making things up so nobody can falsify it. Gibberish.

We used to put deluded psychotics in asylums?

Taking power from the right then lowering standards until it’s run into the ground.
We won’t step in and save it (at least, I hope nobody cucks).

Difference of power but no biological differences? Haven’t read Darwin, huh?

It is impossible, they do write fairytales and get angry with the common man, his privilege of living in real reality with objective results compared to their unreality of how things “should be” according to their religion, where Governments are God and NGOs don’t exist.

National debt triggers them because it shows their God isn’t omnipotent.
Their Satan figure isn’t who they think: it’s fractional reserve banking.

They genuinely believe (snort) that a dollar in their hand (snort) is actually worth (snort) one dollar!

Should’ve mentioned the classism, hegemony is too civil.

Hegemony from whom?

Here, the White Working Class. It is exclusive, but where it used to be race or sex, it’s now class and whites.

Unis might as well have signs up saying No Whites No Poors No Hotties

all forms of “privilege” as cited justification for human rights abuses.

The indigenous people who pay their taxes and maybe pensions. The foreign students won’t bail them out, they’ll be long gone. Not their debt though.

Later it’ll be “I was just following orders”… nope!

If they care about the poor, why not outsource MOOCs for intro level courses, age-restriction free? (since ageism is wrong)…

They don’t want to teach you, they want to own you.

It’s a debt Ponzi with a veneer of prestigious “education”.

However, the curriculum is totally different than when they stole the institutions with that prestige and now their status is tanking, it’s deserved.

The purpose of Marx, for example, isn’t to help the poor. He aims to use the poor like a tool. Capitalism has helped more poor people if you actually look. The purpose of Marx is to justify theft (including rape, if you think about it, to take anything “needed”*, entitlement to any resource from a blood bond**) and because humans rebel against rights violations for continued survival, eventually mass murder (since only the many can provide for the few in the Party***, like a large field is quickly overtaken with a very small number of locust). The appetites of man vary and some are insatiable, whether they call them needs or urges.

*This explains all the lefty rape scandals, including the SWP.

** Technically, you can’t get more racist than Communism. They deem humans a race and then try to rob you to death for belonging to that race (including robbing you of the right to flee or disagree, for example). Heads I am entitled, tails you owe me. It’s a death cult.

***Anyone who wants to become a politician, in a logical society, should get shot instantly. It’s akin to saying “I’m a psychopath, let me in your kitchen with all the knives!” It should be a minimum wage, secondary job with no prestige whatsoever.

Nobody has profiled the true basis of modern thought. They are consumerist but more sensory, purely hedonism than owning things to look at it (abstain from destruction). If they can’t eat it or show off with it or fuck it, the left wing doesn’t want it. It’s the most consumerist position available because they want to make it a part of themselves or remove it from the world.
I can’t be bothered to detail why or how I came to know this so I’ll throw it here for others to look.

The core of Marx’s works and all who came after.

Look into the Marquis de Sade.

“Nature, who for the perfect maintenance of the laws of her general equilibrium, has sometimes need of vices and sometimes of virtues, inspires now this impulse, now that one, in accordance with what she requires”

If I attributed that to Marx, you would’ve believed me. The original moral relativist, he hired a maid and tortured her.

Her rights were relatively unimportant to him. A rope would be relatively applied to his neck if he weren’t rich.

Anyone who deserves the death penalty is a “relativist”, ever notice that?
They aren’t balanced and passive as you’d expect from the theory (that’s Buddhism and has many absolutes) but actively destructive and immoral for the thrill and novelty (r). How can they “explore” a line, as they often intellectualize, if the line does not exist?

He was a monster who should’ve been hanged and we are living in his philosophy, gone mainstream.
There is the source of your degeneracy.

Man has always been consumed by his appetites individually but never so encouraged, socially, never bailed out consequentially, never forgiven publicly (only by the MSM, look at the DM’s attitude to adultery or any use of “romp”) and never so indulged financially at the expense of others.

We don’t let the losers lose. We treat every degenerate like a prince of old, coddled into a mess of chaos that consumes us with them. Pathological altruism. Russell Brand should be mocked a la Harlot’s Progress.

Do the SJWs ever bring up de Sade? This would be telling, he’s the poster boy of male privilege.

Nope, or they call him a “libertine” hero.

Pedophile. Hero. Seriously.

Social psychology fraud

I am shocked.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5842893/Famed-Stanford-prison-experiment-shows-naturally-abuse-power-based-LIES.html

I am looking at his book “The Lucifer Effect”.

Literally looking at it.

It is also full of shit.

He wanted to be famous because he was jealous of Milgram, ask around.

Charge him with fraud.

Make an example.

Who wants to tell them personality tests are a way to exclude races and classes you don’t like from job applications, since you aren’t allowed to use IQ?

Narrative: criminals are innocent little babies.

comment
“I have three psychology degrees (two postgraduate). One of the reasons I left academia was because I felt frustrated with the way research was conducted and how results were interpreted. Researchers often get the results they want to see and only ‘successful’ studies make it into journals. There are many highly intelligent people working in this field (or fields- psychology is diverse) and these are good people. What I discovered was often a lack of common sense in the academic bubble. In fact, ‘common sense’ was sneered at.”

Ah, confirmation bias!
Experimenter bias!

The new priests. No questioning!

Next, Kinsey.

A lot of faking about child sexuality and consent there.

In the #MeToo age, come on!

Smash all the sacred cow jars.

Obviously, embracing the animal nature of your sexuality and exaggerating it is doubleplusgood. Be less human! It’ll end well!

I’ve never seen a single life outcome study on that.

Not one.

Yet we all accept it as “fact”…

despite how basic observation demonstrates sexuality is corrosive to 1st world society.

Who is accepted in their place?

Which group/s get reserved seats on the privilege train?

The hot ticket?

Is it jobs for Boys or jobs for goys?

The public demand answers.

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/06/15/harvard-limits-number-asian-applicants-accepts/

Meanwhile the genocidal oppression of punishing loans gets no mention…

because redneck white trash is more privileged than a rich Asian heir.

Natives didn’t have to worry about domestic competition prior to multiculturalism.

It didn’t have to be this way.

You’re already competing with the world, you didn’t have to invite it in.