Queer theory pedophilia

Of particular note is when they call him a ‘homophobe’ for quoting factual political references to pedophilia.
Plus randomly “you do not care about trans people lives”.
Yeah but factually neither do they, having a high rate of HIV and trying to ‘trap’ men, sexual predation.

Morals are not relative and ‘consent’ has nothing to do with good and evil.
That’s a dangerous one, that ‘professor’, never tells you his opinion.

Professor is the new preacher but they are God, they tell you what is good.

Appeal to Foucault, you’re still the one saying it. He even pronounced it wrong.

Not just the UK

Yes, they’re coming for your kids.

https://www.wbtv.com/2019/06/28/texas-considers-introducing-sex-education-kindergartners/

Pedos, everywhere. I told you ‘Sex Ed’ was the enemy. All you need is one biology class age 12. Any mention of pleasure (postmodern political theory) is child grooming. Sex is intercourse intended as babymaking and anything else (biology 101) has no place in a classroom. STD rates have gone up with pleasure-centric ‘Sex Ed’, it should be banned on a public health basis alone. It is not exercise, it is not sport, it is not a hobby. It has serious life-ruining consequences.

See, after teaching comes ‘tolerance’, then compulsory ‘acceptance’, then ‘understanding’ then consent.

Didn’t Buzzfeed say toddlers understand consent a few years ago?

Fun fact: most pedophiles are male and same-sex attracted. That’s why history hated them.

Because a man castrating himself and turning an outie into a gaping void is a totally sane decision.

Distinguish Sex Ed from grooming

The new term for child grooming is Sex Ed, if you look into what they’re actively encouraging.

https://gab.ai/truthwhisper/posts/38494894

“A pamphlet/book called, ‘Happy, Healthy, and Hot’ pushed and endorsed by the United Nations says you DON’T have to tell potential sexual partners that you have HIV, in ‘It’s Perfectly Normal’, and the “It’s All One Curriculum’ that has and is being given out to tens of millions of children is recommended for kids under ten years old.

In these three pamphlets it shows graphic images of kids and adults masturbating,

Instruction manual

why do they need to know how to service an adult?

teaching five-year-olds that masturbation is not harmful,

tell that to A&E

porn really needs to be restricted completely from minors

it’s causing brain damage

gay sex, in the ‘It’s All One Curriculum’ they use the term “sexual pleasure” 62 times,

“consent” doesn’t make something moral and hedonism is mostly evil

I mean Satanism is just hedonism dressed up as a philosophy instead of being subhuman.

the term “abortion” is mentioned 112 times

get em while they’re young?

and it says “there is no right age to have sex.”

We need age of consent laws to be heavily enforced and set at age of majority, 18.

Classes now where nine-year-old little girls are taught how to put a condom on a plastic penis.”

The purpose of grooming is to shock and brainwash the child about what’s “normal” (said to be common) and implied to be expected of them, called gaslighting. This is how you’d raise a prostitute. Mental abuse and confusion forced about a range of depraved sexual acts people decades ago never heard of.

They’re raping the child’s innocence first. Rape as in to seize, this is abhorrent. We need shame in culture again. If you aren’t mature enough to have children, you shouldn’t be babymaking. This goes for the potential fathers too. Pregnancy is not a disease nor an accident, it’s the intended result of sexual activity.

Calling it “sleeping with” is another weasel term of theirs, call it baby-making because Darwin.

I saw one guy who was sleeping with a woman but too scared of the word “lover” to introduce her as such. He shouldn’t be so much as touching a woman with that immaturity. Take responsibility for your slutting, manwhores.

There’s no research into whether child masturbation is harmful (or not) but it probably is. Odds are it triggers premature puberty and that messes with the genetics’ signalling. Female menarche used to occur around age 17, 18. Premature anything is bad news for development.

You may remember abandoned children, m/f, hit puberty early and it does mess them up.

We really need to segregate schools by sex, mixed schools were a terrible idea.

I hope Trump makes it that parents can sue teachers, starting with the groomers.

Just enforce the law already?

We’re returning to 50s morality where strangers can’t talk to one another without it being weird.

Here, it’s still pretty weird and not just a London thing, it’s English and cultural.

LEWDNESS IS ALREADY ILLEGAL.

Disturbing the peace and other offences.

Honour culture coming back. We didn’t need to say it plainly to fellow high IQ Europeans with a Christian culture. Criminal White men who tried it on were fought with canes, umbrellas and hat pins. They tried to claim sexist, despite attacking first. We could stop the conflicts any time we like with deportations of rule-breakers. One strike and you’re out, we have the CCTV. But is it worth hurting some poor white girl for existing, for someone who doesn’t have to be here in the first place, should we wait until there’s already a trauma? Women don’t respond to sexual attention in public like men, it’s a negative experience. Singling out a person in public is bullying. When it’s sexual, it’s acting like looking good is a sin (so women dress more like men and they’re still whining). Women don’t need to act like men or the way predators want them to act (gaslighting, “you should take it as a compliment!” – nope, still illegal). It’s humiliating, intentionally, it’s mocking, equivalent to groping a child (also low testosterone). It’s forced sexualization so traditional men are most opposed to harassment, the street isn’t a free-for-all brothel – the assumption is No. We don’t allow one group (children) to be harmed in public (by those who find them sexually attractive) blithely (children can’t help looking cute/what they are either) so no, this isn’t Brave New World, there is no entitlement to the bodies of others. You can’t rob a bakery because you’re hungry, we expect people in the First World to act like a human, dogs can have more control on these matters! Does cake before a hungry man have more rights than a white woman in her homeland? Who do we care about more, ingroup safety or outgroup “honour”? Who is we? Guest right has long expired. Social trust is more important than anyone’s feigned feelings of dishonour, they dishonoured themselves by their criminal actions.

This problem won’t go away. The lower IQ, the weaker self control. Weak-willed people have no excuse. If you don’t like the West, move. You aren’t important.

The subtext is: to prevent harassment/rape, women should look less like women.

This has never been true. It’s a blatant lie, blaming the victim. Covered head to toe, women are attacked and have been historically. It’s like saying a poor man is never robbed. And how can a rich man or an attractive woman stop being, stop existing? Laughable psychopathy on display, to insist the world magically alter its properties because these people don’t want to control their degeneracy. The predator DESERVES to be met with force.

Victims don’t deserve it, that’s a just world fallacy!

Maybe if you’re nice to the tiger/Muslim, it won’t eat/rape you! That isn’t how predation works, cuck.

Should you take it as a compliment that a burglar found your house “nice enough” to rob? You should enjoy the slanderous “attentions” of the SJWs!

The real meaning is “let us”, be completely passive, let us harm you and play along (don’t “snitch” and assert your human rights). We don’t take that aiding and abetting, enabling approach to predators in the civilized world.

A straight male sexual predator will be attracted to women because they’re women, whatever they look like. You cannot help being in that category. It’s genetic, the way you were born and exist. Like a child cannot help being in a pedophile’s predation group. Is it their fault for looking too cute? Should we ban cuteness? Predators are a sheer minority and we mustn’t fall for their tricks or lies in enabling them. They are wrong, not the people they harm. There is no Original Sin of whiteness or attractiveness, unless you’re insane.

But harassment’s always been illegal?

Why should your culture come last? That’s why they are there, to be in your culture.

The hypoagency proclaimed by sexual predators is detestable. Going to a nudist beach shouldn’t “provoke” rape, you piece of shit. Children walk around naked too…. just saying.

We are not America. They allowed in the past century, their laws to slide to speak to and treat one another like shit. Watch how many harassment laws they break on “prank” shows to lube you up for it. That isn’t funny.

https://www.rt.com/news/434993-france-whistling-bill-women/

Meanwhile, not a word on groping, grabbing, rape.

What’s key is … that the laws of the French republic forbid insulting, intimidating, threatening and following women in public spaces,” 

They need these laws now. How long until more etiquette laws are brought in?
The PUA scam pretends to sell non-white men a method for turning any white woman into a free whore. It’s a scam but the “techniques” which legally qualify as harassment will land them in court eventually, including incitement to harass, I tried warning for years. They made their bed. Prison bed.

It’s incitement to harass on a sexual (sex, noun) and race basis too, so like… triple illegal.

If you ask a question more than once, it’s coercion. Goes for sales too. If the first No isn’t respected, why should the 20th? Although wearing someone down is an abuse tactic.

It’s like the French women who had to move but still said diversity was good because, men don’t realize, they might literally be murdered for saying anything less to the press. Diversity takes away your liberty. To know who rules over you…

Cut off the welfare state to the non-French and they’ll leave. It’s the only way to handle an infestation of leeches, cut off supply.

Emma Thompson complains her daughter was grabbed but says nothing about the legal right to self-defense or fear of being stabbed and melted with acid.

When you can’t defend yourself, you’re a slave.

Meanwhile, on the child connection

https://yournewswire.com/french-law-children-consent-sex/

ageism!

http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2018/08/03/01016-20180803ARTFIG00271-consentement-sexuel-la-loi-ne-pose-pas-de-limite-d-age.php

Minors cannot consent. Set it to 18/age of majority!

BASED Asians

Sharper than your katana.

Honorary Whites, amirite? They’re on our side. Just look at India

http://nypost.com/2017/10/24/apathetic-bystanders-recorded-rape-on-street-rather-than-call-for-help/

China

China Refuses to Admit It Has a Rape Problem. I Would Know.

Korea

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/10/25/north-korea-christians-beaten-raped-tortured/

Japan!

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/10/06/recalling-japans-comfort-women-rapes/

They’re so much more civilized than us!

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/10/12/asia-pacific/social-issues-asia-pacific/india-supreme-court-rules-child-bride-sex-issue-campaigners-set-sights-marital-rape/

The age of consent in India is 18 years old

Shit, on that count they are literally more civilized than us.

Collectivists are Communists, ya idjits.

https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/collectivism

Asians are acknowledged in cross-cultural studies as a collectivist race.

http://asianamericanpsych.blogspot.co.uk/2010/05/collectivism-vs-individualism.html
http://www.apa.org/monitor/feb06/connection.aspx

^Yes, that APA.

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170118-how-east-and-west-think-in-profoundly-different-ways
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_values
You can’t run a West with Easterners.
The I in WEIRD? Industrial without corruption, individualistic value.

Click to access WeirdestPeople.pdf

http://time.com/3949424/chinese-immigrants-u-s/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10480785/Most-immigrants-to-the-UK-now-come-from-China-figures-show.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/12111108/Mapped-Which-country-has-the-most-immigrants.html

South-East Asian and African countries saw the lowest levels of inward migration, with China, Vietnam and Cuba having the lowest numbers. These had rates of lower than 15 immigrants per 10,000 people.

It’s like a plague of locusts at this point. Show me a rich place the Chinese haven’t tried to push in for gibs.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/08/asians-now-outpace-mexicans-in-terms-of-undocumented-growth/432603/

Why am I the one doing all your research for you?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/sep/28/us-immigration-asians-to-surpass-hispanics-2065

http://www.circleid.com/posts/20141001_infographic_where_in_the_world_do_chinese_people_live/

https://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/08/a-surprising-map-of-the-world-shows-just-how-big-chinas-population-is/278691/

It’s right there, under your nose.

According to the map, we can see that:

  • The population of China is equivalent to the population of North America, South America, Australia, New Zealand, and all of Western Europe — combined.
  • The population of China is equivalent to the combined population of the former Soviet Union, plus Pakistan, Afghanistan, Finland, Poland, Slovakia, Romania, and Hungary. Oh, and all of Southeast Asia, Japan, and both Koreas.
  • The population of China is equivalent to the population of Africa, the Balkans, and the Middle East put together. 
  • The population of China is equivalent to that of the world’s second most populous country, India, plus that of Nepal, Bhutan, and Bangladesh.

Marrying off children is always wrong

I wouldn’t trust people who think otherwise with a goldfish for the weekend, they might try to insert things into it.
The internet has made men deviant by placing all this monstrous filth at their disposal and they can congregate and assure one another it’s normal. Born this way, right? 

People are not possessions.
One triumph of the First World is self-possession.

You’re not even a fully developed adult until the mid-twenties.
It’s biological, look it up.

I mention this because some terrible people claiming to be right-wing want slaves. The original kind, the one that is purely for the purposes of rape. Instead of acknowledging they want someone they can rape and beat and, in their mind, get away with it, they try to make it socially acceptable – by insulting the institution of marriage.

That’s why they claim to be right-wing, trying  to make pro-marriage, pro-….whatever messed-up things they can think of, only to claim, what, that women want abuse? Nobody in the history of the world has ever believed that, if you’re a shit person at least admit it to yourself.

Women went to convents to avoid marrying these types of “men”.

Both parties enter any legal contract willingly.

There shouldn’t be any underage marriage, anywhere. It’s an oversight we’ve yet to correct.
If they’re not adults they cannot consent.
Children cannot consent.

Yet you see these creepy conversations in certain places about when to ‘get’ a girl (a Middle Eastern idea they openly admit, like bride kidnapping) so she can be brainwashed and conditioned into being a domesticated slave. 1. That doesn’t work, 2. that isn’t legal, 3. you won’t like your ‘purchase’ once it grows up and has a personality and will and intelligence likely above yours.

I love how many Thai brides and the like are divorcing their green-card old fogey husbands after the required years, who genuinely thought in all their smarts that these teenagers would be attracted to them, three, four or once I saw, five times their age. They’re not going to stick around and look after you. They think you’re a creepy lech, they hate you. Who wants to care for a person like that? Does it sound sexy to you? They weren’t attractive in their prime to begin with. Don’t expect Asian women to be all-about breaking out the adult diapers for your sagging ass, they’re just better at playing you for a while, as LBFMs. That’s if they don’t murder you and take your money, as younger wives have done for millennia, especially when forced by social circumstance i.e. money.

Completely one-sided and never foisting this on underage boys (like they can afford to slag off Ancient Greece) from a remnant sense of shame and disgrace, they expect somehow there’ll be a surplus of young women, despite how Those cultures have the opposite problem, and they’ll all be magically dying to marry men old enough to be their grandfather, or great-grandfather.

It’s sick.
It’s pedophilia.
It isn’t right-wing, it’s totally r-selected, early marriage is literally one of the cornerstones of r-selection, degenerate to boot, legally and morally wrong in every sense (the if she bleeds thing is completely medically false naturalistic fallacy, women died a lot that way so society stopped it and menarche never used to be this early, it used to be 17-19), it’s a state-sponsored form of child rape to trap an adult while they’re too weak to defend themselves and deprive them of any self-sufficiency (basic education), putting her in a big dress and a parody of a ring ceremony doesn’t change that fact.

God can see you.

Do you want to live in that craven culture?

And none of them developed as a strategy with an aging population, men used to die around middle-age, as we’d call it now.

I’m not going to allow them to pretend that’s ever been traditional. It isn’t anywhere in the Bible to sell your kid sister like a more fuckable goat, maybe convert to Islam if raping little girls is your thing.
It’s a case of how low can you go when raping children is socially acceptable. Why not primary-age? Nursery age? Newborns? Slippery slope is very real in this case.

There are sickening conversations about How Non-White Countries Do Things.

Yeah, cos we should model ourselves on them, huh?

Have you seen their standard of living? Do those people seem happy to you?
They’re wading through rubbish and shit nine times of ten. They rely on us like dependents for food and water. Have you looked at the IQs? Is that not a dysgenic breeding habit, to be discouraged?

And they basically only mean the pretty ones… with standards… okay, how is it physically possible for the above-average to become the average?

So what if Japan has an age of consent of fourteen, you sick fuck??

A virgin would still know you’re a terrible person and be dissatisfied with your sexual performance, girls are not stupid and teenage girls are the most critical species on the planet. It isn’t Hell Hath No Fury Like A Man Scorned, is it?

The vagina isn’t even necessary for female sexual pleasure, Freud was trying to massage his own ego, basically everything a woman needs is in the structures broadly called the clitoris, the homologue of the penis. These omega male powertrip fantasies about being the big strong man of Mills and Boon dreams slaking a nubile young woman’s lust are hilarious in the era of Ann Summers and the like. [I’m not insulting male sex toys either, it’s just a fact.] Women even have a prostate, there’s a female prostate, and it has basically nothing to do with what men do.

When her hands are better than you, and she sees better men for endurance online, she’ll have plenty of opportunity to mock you, and you can’t escape. That’s the real reason the beatings happen. Weak men try to show dominance, fail as they do, and take it out on the women and animals. The pattern repeats. Nobody is happy.

And if you marry to become a patriarch, do you want your children raised in fear, knowing their mother hates you?

The West has love matches because they’re better for the whole family. It’s civic and key to our success.

Children aren’t possessions or status symbols either. Keep your mutt, those enjoy obedience and humiliation.

Would you sell your daughters off for the same treatment? Probably not.

Like a cult, the mothers help too, it’s the cycle of abuse.

That watermark is unfortunate.

The Sexual Revolution had nothing to do with politics

Because which sexual strategy would benefit from this?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/17/girl-aged-11-to-become-britains-youngest-mother
Plenty of outlets are covering this. I’m linking them because they report it like it’s a nice thing.
https://www.rt.com/uk/381135-pregnant-youngest-mother-girl/
The fornication is fine, it’s good for you goyim…
You’re definitely not going to Hell because we said so.

Call it right. Call it consensual, I fucking dare you.

Think rabbit, think-

Link: Age of menarche and dietary fat

fusion.net/story/171930/early-puberty-period-age-matters-breast-cancer/

Why post about this?

A lot of men stupidly assume it’s a hard limit. For men obsessed with writing about women’s bodies, the least they could do is be well informed on the biology.
Nope, it’s variable, and like men, an earlier age can be triggered by masturbation (which a lot of ‘modern’ Sex Ed encourages). Putting that piece of trivia out there, in the easy porn era. There must be a similar effect for men. The hormones involved kick start the process. It may be to blame for all the hormonal issues suffered by women nowadays, and since the egg reserves are depleted faster, earlier infertility or lower sperm quality in men (more mutation generations in the same age range).

Why tag manosphere, of all things?

They seem to think the Naturalistic Fallacy can be applied to age of consent.

“If she bleeds, she breeds” among other disgusting perversions of Darwin. [ot: IT DOESN’T SAY THAT ANYWHERE EVER] The body takes about 2-3 years to stabilize once puberty begins. Sometimes longer, up to five. It’s a system, there isn’t a single marker. Otherwise, natural birth defects and natural death in childbirth await your ‘natural’ guidance. Let’s be honest, they have a virginity fetish, they’d lose interest after the first time.

However, if women are fertile by nature at 17, then they can’t possibly endorse of paedophilia of Japan’s age of consent, for example. But they will, because they’re pedophiles at heart. The kind of guy to constantly go after 18-25 year olds when he’s old enough to be their father. No logic can diminish vain lust.

This type of information fundamentally refutes their porn-fed ignorance.

comeoutcomeout

Spot the Paedophile is always such a fun game and even easier than Spot the Vegan.
Casually mention this in conversation and it’s surprising, like the classic question of asking which Harry Potter film Hermione got hot in.

The adverse effect of porn on pair bonding and monogamy (hello Coolidge Effect) also rustles their ‘redpill’ jimmies.

Comic: The Cure for Cancer and other Pro-Life

Cure for Cancer
Since the so-called pro-choice people are only ever pro-abortion, anti-natal, I thought to balance the dialogue out somewhat. I won’t use religion since these people don’t believe in the soul, nor have one, just science and logic.

abortion choice2

There are plenty of choices. Sex cannot be separated from reproduction. This is impossible and a lie. Every time someone consents to have sex, they consent to become a parent, should the sex result in conception. This is why expectant parents are congratulated before the birth, as soon as the test flags it within 3-5 weeks, because they are already parents, having conceived. Usually people who are trying for a baby say they are ‘trying to conceive’ and are congratulated on this point in particular. Sex is a medical choice, regarding the body, yet minors are considered fit to make it in some places, an overhang from underage marriages which should be struck off the books. Sexual consent should be the same age as majority, same as marriage and medical decisions (are not abortion, pregnancy and/or gynecological matters, all medical?). The parents of a miscarriage are still parents.

abortion choiceishavingsex

Never have sex unless you’re prepared to become a parent.
This is idiotically simple. If you aren’t prepared to be a parent, you shouldn’t be taking the ‘risk’ of pregnancy aka the consequence of your chosen action. Contraception is a myth, it simply reduces the probability and causes many issues besides. Abortion itself is linked with cancer because the stem cells from the baby take their revenge.

abortion oppression

Someone who refuses to see the connection between sex and babies should be legally classed as retarded. Actually no, I think even they get it, that’s unfair to the retarded, they can see causal connections. These fools shouldn’t be saying “no uterus, no opinion” when they have no idea what a uterus is for (clue: not sex, stupid slut). At least the ones who try to get their uterus removed are honest about it.

abortionguns

abortionreaction

They learn in the womb. Prenatal psychology.
They are sentient beings. They accrue new information.

betterthanbeingpoor

The world is majority poor, is killing them a merciful thing to do, to save them from their poverty?
Essentially, these middle class twits are saying “better dead than poor” and “better dead than adopted”.

cardiaclife

That would be the strict legal definition yes.

massmurder

Literally true, no matter how you fudge the numbers skyward. The numbers Auschwitz themselves revised down on new plaques.
Surely a few million of those people would have been geniuses? 3% MENSA standard? Surely a few of them would have been brilliant scientists, trying to cure cancer?

plannedparenthoodabortion

No liberal wants to talk about this one so I’m putting it, dammit.
Abortion is eugenic because only people dumb enough to go in for it will get one.

reproductiveright

Reproduction in sexual mammals is the combination of maternal and paternal DNA. This is literally what conception is. The egg and the spermatozoa. That’s it, case closed, there is a novel genetic lifeform.
inb4 what if it doesn’t attach? Naturally, this doesn’t happen. The fertilized egg hangs around long enough to attach undisturbed while the mother is sleeping, unless her uterine lining is damaged (incredibly rare). However, women imitate this sterilizing effect chemically, and it can remain once the chemicals are no longer taken and cause infertility. Look up the infertility forums for women who took the Pill for years and suddenly cannot get pregnant, nature doesn’t like being cheated and will prompt super-early/premature menopause too. This occurs most often when they take it from childhood (based on lies it was OK) because the reproductive system hasn’t finished developing (into the 20s, it stabilizes, shown by regularity, same with men and sperm quality at about 18).
The Pill is a chemical abortifacient. The same as various herbal teas throughout history and just as dangerous.

thepill chemical abortion thepill chemical abortion2 infertility

So Pill is not an option. If a woman wants to be sterile, have your tubes tied or uterus removed.
Temporary sterility is impossible. Fertility is not a tap you can turn on and off at will. Many of the women who make these decisions deserve a childless existence because they have no respect for life.

weakestamongusvictim

Pregnancy isn’t a disease. What irks me personally is how the women who pretend to regret it will say their child would have forgiven them. How self-centred can one person be? No, you valued your comfort over their very existence, those children rightfully despise their parents. You are as much a murderer as Jack the Ripper, and he didn’t kill kin. It wasn’t personal, intimate and chosen (except for rape, there was no sex involved because there was no consent, tantamount to using a turkey baster to achieve the same result). Medical urgency is another fitting reason but again, the mother already made a medical choice in conceiving and should try to spare the child wherever possible.

We don’t use a special name for the mother who chooses this (and/or the father who pressures her, it can happen it’s called reproductive abuse), and mothers of miscarriages are still called mothers (correctly), the status is ascribed based on conception. Abortionists don’t deserve to be called mother or father. We should call the abortion-users what they are (barring the exceptions stated for rape and mortality risk) by act: murderers. If it isn’t true, why would it bother them? If they can brag and laugh off their abortion in videos while getting them, they don’t see it as human, why not? The insult shouldn’t stick.

Murder is unlawful killing. The law only permits abortion based on outdated insubstantial medical evidence that fails to overcome the non-personhood assumption. Were these topics reviewed today, as they will be, there can be no doubt. The physiological and psychological reactions observed would grant personhood. It is certainly killing, so perhaps killer would be a more apt descriptor?

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/h_to_k/homicide_murder_and_manslaughter/

Interestingly, UK law doesn’t prohibit the charge of infanticide as applied to abortion. Meaning, if the current other laws were over-turned, say by new medical evidence of personhood, all those who obtained or provided abortions could be charged after the fact. Infanticide is defined as a victim under 12 months, there is no minimum age given.

It doesn’t even mention birth as the starting point, in the murder law itself. Case law, which can be overturned, created the exception.

http://e-lawresources.co.uk/The-law-of-murder.php

Malice aforethought is the intention to kill. Well, they intend it to cease living so I guess we can call that one in the affirmative. Interestingly, a foetus was considered a non-human, before proper MRI technology came in to study this question. Personhood is granted upon birth, despite a plethora of evidence henceforth of psychological individual experience and therefore, existence. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maternal-fetal_medicine

The mother’s life is not superior to the person inside her, there is a symbiosis, a mutual exchange. For example, when she is injured, the foetus sends out stem cells, which she cannot do. They each provide life support.

See? There is no religion required to make an argument against abortion.

Isn’t science fun?

Paper: Towards a fetal psychology (2010);

Click to access Special%20Issue%20introduction.pdf

IQ data before someone has a go.

http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/iqtable.aspx

3% is the most conservative estimate to provide for potential, not to be confused with performance.