Not even on a date

http://www.agcwebpages.com/BLINDITEMS/2019/MARCH.html

Don’t Drink Near Him: Over the past few years, there have always been whispers of what this A+ list mostly movie actor was like back in high school. They were believable because he had exhibited those same behaviors for several of the years when he first started acting. He would be drinking with a woman and be charming and when she would get drunk he would take her home or to his car and he would rape her. It happened often enough here in town that he wasn’t allowed in some bars. None of the women ever pressed charges, but word quickly spread. Several of his celebrity relationships ended abruptly because of how he treated them. A few weeks ago, I ran into someone who went to high school with the actor and asked about the whispers I had always heard. She said every female in school was warned to never drink alone with him or even near him. She knew multiple friends in school who had not listened to that advice and ended up unable to fight him off because they were too drunk or passed out. Two of those teens became pregnant and one carried the baby to term. The actor knows about the baby but has never recognized it as his own except when he gleefully signed away his parental rights when a man she married chose to adopt the child as his own. The actor bragged that he never had to pay a dime of child support.George Clooney

So much for a game, alcohol is a rape drug.
The company Markle keeps, eh? What a proud feminist.
Don’t let him run for POTUS.

Remember, those women would’ve also been minors. Virgins too, no minimum age.

There’s a superhoe with a similar MO (finding them drunk in clubs) that keeps hiding behind the same-looking women. These people are sick. This type are always called “charming”.

Adding alcohol to unwitting victim’s drinks is hardly difficult but it is low.

Predators don’t care for who but HOW. Typical rules of sexuality do not apply.

Video: The 9 traits of the borderline personality

Male or female.

The instability (emotional) is the BIG one.

Much like a psychopath, they cannot hold down a (healthy) relationship. Bonds between a couple must be stable.

However, like a codependent, they feel they’re nothing without someone, ANYONE.

Stop and start. Stop and start. Lots of small connections, one night stands.

The typical one night stand (m/f) has a far higher chance of being borderline.

Lashing out at anyone rejecting them, however trivial.

Yep, the angry phone number guys. The occasional woman who gets angry if a random man doesn’t want to fuck her. The entitlement.

Borderlines DO NOT DO rejection. It’s a main trigger.

They have no self to fall back on. Obsessed with self-improvement, no identity though. Constantly trying new things that never seem to work out (think Madonna’s looks). Lots of “bad luck” with the opposite sex. Tendency to idolize others, have idols, especially online. They gain a sense of self via this Other. The stans who can delude themselves into stalking, harassing or raping their idol, dangerous people. A courtship disorder is possible or simple limerence at a distance. Feeling a sense of ownership, viewing other humans as objects or property.

Vengeful, rage tantrums, can attempt to justify abuse with some imagined or minor slight.

You provoked me” or “you made me hurt you” or “why can’t you behave”?

That would be the classic “bunny boiler” or “disturbed young man” type.

It’s common to hear, “I own you” …. they actually think this.

Both are big on gaslighting so can be confused with a narcissist, which actually isn’t (usually) as bad.

It’s the men who ask to an abused woman “what did you do to make him hit you”?

Classic BPD, sick bastards. They never man up, nothing is ever their personal fault, even the actions of their own body don’t feel like they belong to them. When they picture themselves as the man (issues with empathy for the opposite sex), they assume the man was never at fault, even if he threatened murder.

They will FIND an excuse to hurt.

“I’m the real victim here”, as the other party is bleeding and traumatized in the corner.

They can seem glib like the psychopath or narcissist and can be at times grandiose with narc features. However, it’s an act, usually in response to attention. It’s fake. Their come-down is when this reality hits them again, which can look bipolar. They claim to be depressed when they don’t want to do something, a lot of small compulsive lies.

A rollercoaster of emotional bullshit. Like psychopaths, they deny their own condition but ALSO spread outright lies about it (we’re nice really, we’re the real victim, we suffer,  pity us, you can fix us etc).

The logical reply is “wait, if you don’t have it, how do you know so much about it?”

This makes them angry. You wouldn’t like them when they’re angry (they can intimidate by threatening this “loss” of temper, which is a deliberate choice to abuse). Adults don’t lose their temper, toddlers do, because toddlers are still developing the brain areas to control it.

Anger isn’t really an emotion, it’s an impulse. They have issues, emotion is quite healthy but being angry all the time is bad for your body. The Bobo dolls study and others show feeding anger makes it stronger and more frequent. “Let it all out” applies to tears, not physical abuse. Angry people get an endorphin rush, abusers enjoy abusing.

Like the psychopath, they study a lot online of how normal people think. They can quote forum posts to act normal or pass for intelligent, to lure in victims. It’s vapid trivia masquerading as knowledge.

A dichotomous view of life that is too shallow to withstand scrutiny.

e.g. all men are rapists/assholes v. all women are whores/crazy.

The common denominator there….

See, they find it helpful to define themselves in terms of what they’re not.

They deny their Shadow Self and project it, it’s stereotypical they claim they’re incapable of that Evil Terrible Terrible Thing. But the Enemy is FULL of it, to bursting! It’s so obvious!

Race they belong to generally but self-loathing can present if encouraged.

Sexism is far more common because of parental issues.

So it’s the misogynist who says

“I’m not sexist, I just don’t trust or believe or respect women.

OR

For balance, the misandrist who says

“I’m not sexist, I just don’t like or rely on or hang around men.”

It can present in so many ways but they’re blind to it, having projected it far, far away from what they believe is physically possible.

Anyone who thinks it’s impossible to be sexist personally, ever, at any point, is living in a bubble. Prejudices exist in all humans.

Being suspicious of all women is dodgy, being suspicious of a seductive woman, taking a sudden, keen interest in you, as warned in the Bible, is common sense.

Being distrustful of all men is off, being distrustful of a man who is insincere and keeps pushing boundaries is survival instinct.

Sexists are just lazy. Within a race, there are too many personal similarities to claim a broad genetic danger.

The psychotic thing is obvious.

“The world hates women” and “The world hates men”.

Obvious bullshit, there’s moderate but clear evidence on both sides (balance) so neither sweeping statement is true. It’s another excuse. Not to try, to abuse the “enemy” group, to get perceived revenge yada yada.

It’s actually:

The world hates (substitute for Self) so I am morally allowed to (do terrible, evil thing).

Like the #KillAllMen or Elliot murder spree fans.

It’s a selfish Crusaderism. If they clashed with that group, say SJW women to anti-SJW women, they’d hate that supposed group they claim to care about, the most of all. Thatcher gets the most hatred of any dead politician because she was a woman. In a sickening display, they got the radio to play “ding dong the witch is dead” on news of her demise. The working class loved her so the Left despise her. Great men and geniuses are envied most by omegas, they plot to literally kill people, other men are just last. It’s like Marx leeching off of Engels, a man who owned means of production. Marx lived off the blood of the worker happily.

These people are dangerous and abusive.
You love the sinner and punish the saint, you are evil. Defending deviants, rapists (of m/f), whatever it is specifically. This is not First World culture. This is childish and bitter. This is anti-justice.

“We’ll show them” they plot.

The world was right to reject them, really. That’s all they showed.

Triggered degenerate Boomers

Not to be confused with salt of the earth Boomers I hardly ever need to discuss, who aren’t hypocrites and expected their kids to listen when they gave sound health advice.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/11/young-people-drunk-acohol-millenials

Normally when you see this line.

What’s wrong with young people today?

The next sentence better be fucking good.

The Groaniad today continues:

They don’t get drunk any more

WTF.
It’s a new low in moral decay that the elders are trying desperately to corrupt their children.
Alcohol is ridiculous (social media rep), expensive, a stupid (not glamorous) legal dark grey area and an addictive distraction from the important business of networking (which we wouldn’t have to do if you didn’t import competition and switch to offshore training).
We’re told to “protect ourselves”, cannot own a gun or knife or spray in public and given the most common date rape drug is alcohol, why bother?

[see end for that topic]

Nobody wants to be blamed for their own rape or other abuse, especially in this multicultural Hell of rape gangs expressly targeting the white (what hate crime?) and drunk (predators love legal nitpicking). Clubs are losing popularity because women hate hunting grounds. Clubs exist for men and the lowest kind. Pubs more popular than ever, for comparison. Low odds of rape, groping, grinding and (especially Third World) harassment there. Naturally, the club creeps use alcohol as their excuse too. Scientifically false, drunk people can behave impeccably, as you’ll notice the second the police turn up. Other sedatives are not a free pass on assault either.

https://psmag.com/social-justice/placebo-week-getting-drunk-beer-alcohol-expectations-92254

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2634499.stm
“We have made people’s memory worse by telling them that they were intoxicated even though they had nothing stronger than plain flat tonic water with limes,” said co-researcher Maryanne Garry.
So an intake of so-called moderate alcohol wouldn’t be wise either, before someone chimes in.

Think of it as a precautionary legal defense from rapists who take advantage of slow law changes (no major interventions since Queen Victoria’s reign, and on gin) and the crawling consideration of the latest neuroscience. Sugar isn’t cocaine and alcohol doesn’t turn a law-abiding citizen into a rabid rapist, men are not naturally rapists. Nor does it bring that out as an animal instinct, society conditions excuses. You can’t take from a bank drunk and say Muh It Doesn’t Count as robbery, neither can you “take” a human being in rape and victim-blame for the “hate crime” of being white and attractive (note: imagine the pedophiles and other dedicated rapists in response* to that). This is why we need studies, psychology is not common sense. They don’t dare mention where alcohol is consumed (privately, at home) and why (visibly valid concerns about public safety relating to the new low trust society).

It isn’t about women trusting strange men (and why the hell should they? when has that ever been intelligent historically?? and do they trust their fellow random men either?*) it’s that throughout society, there is no trust. Again, why should there be? Burden of Proof. So much rape and abuse isn’t recorded or reported due to political fears of revenge that there are active reasons to distrust, fuck your snowflake feelings on the subject. Why do these broflakes feel entitled to trust they didn’t earn? Normal people (i.e. not manwhores) have lower openness scores. It’s like the funniest red handed moment “how dare you notice I only want one thing and am willing to take it unwillingly, I wanted to rape you if I could get away with it but you hurt my narc feelings, I demand satisfaction”.

Unless you’d prefer women be armed? That would be better.

Predators believe only they are real – their urges, rights etc.
The prey isn’t allowed to plan, complain or have equal HUMAN rights.

*Rapists are as real and sneaky as serial killers, simply different types of predator.

**I bet they don’t let male salesmen into their house, the paranoid sexist pigs. Straight men in gay bars don’t dare get drunk, I rest my case.

Etiquette needs to return, no talking to strangers is basic.

Teen films are fiction, there’s a crime about every five minutes, it’s normalized. Forcing someone to consume alcohol, by coercion or “slipping” covertly, aside from being illegal (directly responsible) if they have any medical issues from it you didn’t know, is poisoning. Then there are the various chemicals in alcohol that are well-known as rape drugs specifically e.g. GHB in wine. Then there’s finally on this point how women are weakened more by alcohol than men so any arguments to “she was with it” ring false from simple sex differences and accurate biology (no woman can handle alcohol, none, it’s a Hollywood myth based on the 30s vamp who’d take one single shot of a hard liquor and stop there).

Why don’t the would-be (totally not definitely never) rapists want people to defend themselves in their company by remaining of lucid consciousness? If they’re so concerned with “false” allegations? Makes you think.

Surely you’d want all women in the club not drinking so when they consent to you, it’s legally kosher. Unless of course, you’re “taking advantage”, and want them insensible, the politest term for rape we have.

And if you only sleep with brain-impaired strangers, don’t you expect allegations?
Why can’t you get your “fun” from sober people?

They try to blame the victim a sneakier way (planning legal defense months before the act itself isn’t odd?) by asking a false dichotomy and presenting a cliche anecdote that acts like the sexes are biologically the same, namely, what if they’re both drunk? The one who physically initiates is the rapist, obviously. Actus reus, look it up, idiots.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/actus_reus

They think they’ve got an AHA! moment on the “both drunk” condition but it’s the simpleton logic of pointing to a car pileup after an accident and claiming all of the cars in question caused it. Non sequitur much?

And define drunk? Given sex differences, you’re still stupid.

Back to booze

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-01-alcohol-dna-cancer.html
Alcohol causes permanent DNA damage and while older people may not care, we’re clued-up enough on science to care an awful lot. It may even pass down the germline (epigenetics).
https://newatlas.com/alcohol-cancer-dna-damage-stem-cell/52813/
Why?
Well, since we’ll be working our entire lives (retirement is a temporary fad) then staying working fit is imperative.
comment
“It concerns me how much people over a certain age brag about their alcohol intake like they don’t have a problem.”
Yes, agree, let’s all aspire to be like the alcoholic divorcees!
Definitely not addictive, is it? They can give up any time they like.
They wanted clean living kids, they got them. If they’re so triggered by the fact their children are literally better than them, their narcissism is not our problem.
Opposing the degeneracy when we see the Bacchanalian wages of it, how absolutely awful of us.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/09/28/millennials-oppose-carousing/

You’re not James Bond, we can now get those martini ingredients in the average Tesco…. Express.
We don’t want to be a burden on the State if we can possibly help it (we know about elder abuse) and neither should they?

https://drugfree.org/learn/drug-and-alcohol-news/alcohol-most-common-date-rape-drug-law-enforcement-officials-say/
https://efficientgov.com/blog/2018/04/04/what-is-the-most-common-date-rape-drug/
https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2014/sep/22/alcohol-date-rape-drug-facilitated-sexual-assault-dfsa
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071020113144.htm

It does count, and anyone who says otherwise is a willing mark in a game of Spot the Rapist. It’s a chemical that impairs the brain from threat recognition and literally weakens the physical ability to resist (fend off). It’s also most common in male rape, regardless of victim age. The law requires adjustments.

Video: Feminists admit rape gangs, angry

Many councils broke out the shredders so their Rotherham-like state sponsored child abuse doesn’t come out.

The denial shows the real r-types, protecting the pedophiles at any cost to the outgroup.

the r in Refugees Welcome signs + funnies

Look at the facial expression in the Bible quote. That’s an atheist going to Hell for blasphemy.

Spliced with photo of actual ‘refugees’. A picture is worth a thousand words.

Hopefully the Manchester attack, nail-bombing little girls has redpilled these feminists.
Somehow I doubt it. This is the one that started it all.

This one in particular triggers me, the way to kill it is with apathy: So?

So was Jack the Ripper, so was Hitler, so is Trump. Tired of whataboutism.

“they are us, we are them”

true

Meanwhile, actual refugees

Yeah, let’s not save these people waving round the white flag of Christendom.

Are they welcome in YOUR home? Why not?

JK Rowling has yet to take in any ‘refugees’ that someone offered to pay to fly to her homes!

She is irrelevant. Like…

Emma Watson hasn’t spent a night in the Calais camp alone, without security.

Locks are racist! No borders? No walls! Let’s all live in pagodas! 

Now a series of triggering memes and funnies.

It’s been a while. 120 funnies. Some repeats. A few serious.

about as real as her hair

Going by her Coco the Clown makeup, I think they do.

The People do not consent to open borders. The native people.

Everyone into Lord of the Rings.

All harassment is bad but sexual harassment is the worst.
It’s the First World, fucking act like it.
Recently, a German woman was beaten by a ‘migrant’, because she told him not to call her a bitch.

Tesla’s expression, my fucking sides.

He never said that but yes. Fitness is in adaptation.

Just like consciousness. You can’t touch it or test it. It’s unfalsifiable. It’s the scientific concept of spirit.
It isn’t scientific though.

Sexual orientation theory is BS. There’s only behaviour – which hole is your goal?

SJW’s playbook.

The alt-lite treats the J-word as their N.

And strange brown men on the street.

The temporary alliance of SJWs and Muslims is simple: the sexually entitled support the sexually entitled.
Also take down White Man but obviously, SJWs aren’t white or men, typically.

What is rape?

Sexual Revolution + Entitlement = r-types

There’s no excuse.

That’s literally, legally and morally the point. There is no mercy, no pardon, no excusing it. It’s an animal thing to do and reduce humans to, disgusts all upright citizens. If one person’s right to their body ceases to exist, it affects all of us. It is always 100% of the time, a crime. ‘Muh dick’ appeals to sexual emergency belong in the desert with the camels. Men, who are the majority of rapists by prevalance data, always have an outlet – two hands. Therefore, no such thing as blue balls as excuse for assault. Like Winona Ryder stealing, it’s spoiled for choice already.

If you try to come up with exceptions, you’re one of them.

Don’t defend criminals. If someone is richer than you, you can’t rob them. If someone is smarter than you, you can’t kill them. If someone turns you on, their body still belongs to them. Prison rape is sometimes deeply ironic.

The language of these discussions is dodgy too. The meaning of sex in society is ‘having sex’, it implies consent between parties (therefore, masturbation isn’t sex). Unless there is consent, it is automatically rape, so calling it sex rather than something literal like penetration, congress or coitus, is plain false. Consent is never assumed. Rape until proven consensual. Like any dead person turning up is presumed murdered. At first. The courts do not operate like that but common law and society do.

If the person you’re sleeping with would lie, you shouldn’t have consented to sleep with them. That’s your filtering problem, society shouldn’t have to change itself and suffer for your singular stupidity. Nobody forces you to be a slut #irony
It’s like promiscuous people complaining about STDs. You chose that life, you chose to take on the risks involved. Drunk people expect hangovers. If a bad consequence happens, question who is responsible for the bad cause. Don’t give crazy people power over you, it’s common sense. Society shouldn’t have sympathy for the dumb, but scorn. And no, wearing a mini-skirt doesn’t count as dumb in the First World, anymore than tight shirts on men. People get raped in petticoats and niqabs. Rapists want to rape, thieves want to steal, murderers want to murder- because they’re evil people. A tape measure to your hemline, a lock on your door and a baseball bat won’t stop such people from existing or targeting anyone (anyone). Nobody is exempt from crime, including punishment.

In the good old days of a Patriarchy, we’d hang rapists.

Not be autistically pedantic about ‘what counts’.

Whataboutism? Sounds like they’re arguing there’s no objective thing as rape, implying we should strike off all those laws and it won’t exist, and that’s the side they ‘debate’ from. Think of the people you’re defending, all of them. That’s you. Like gay stuff that inadvertently defends paedophiles. Still doing it. Yet we continue to see it, it isn’t clever. Nobody will think that.

Moving the goalposts, really? This from so-called ‘smart people’?

You can’t slide a moral absolute. There is no slope, they don’t notice because they crawl on their snake-yellow belly.

If a savage would think you’re a piece of shit…

You can’t defend the indefensible.

This is right up there, top 2. Totally taboo.

Men sluttier than women

Nobody is ‘lying’ either. Learn to read the research, not the commentary feed from some butthurt bloke. The lie scales are applied to both sexes (independent variables) in a given study. That is how they are constructed, literally. For comparison’s sake aka the study, it holds.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/sexual-health-and-advice/8958520/Average-man-has-9-sexual-partners-in-lifetime-women-have-4.html

Why the discrepancy? you wisely ask.

There are fewer female sluts than male, but they put out a lot more per…. ahem, head.

cute wink

Result? Men gain more ‘experience’, to put it politely.

Now, a little theory…

Remember, this studies frequency of switching. The cause can be traced back via IV to frequency of sex acts too, as the two variables are intertwined (men and women). Otherwise, logically, and sexual congress requiring one male and one female, you would expect even results e.g. men 5, women 5. Men are switching between more women, as you can see from their mean, but they are switching among the same pool of women, necessarily, whereas the total of females is much lower. The average female switches partner less, yes, but what type is the average woman? …

Told you promiscuity, the act, was the problem, and male in face. If you insist on blaming one sex, they’re at the centre of anything sexual, online and off.

If you have data, go ahead and prove me wrong, manwhores.

This is as silly as arguing cuckoldry in the age of DNA testing.

In short, this suggests, pending further results, that men use and use up a lower quality of woman before trading up socially to their final partner. Kinda like a good hand to hold in blackjack. To have and to hold.. They crave the social security like women crave the sexual kind. Hypergamy is a mass neurosis of projection, to anyone who can read.

You don’t see large groups of women on the prowl, versus Pull Nights ( lads on the pull). [SATC is fiction, globally and historically.]

Pool* = sample, arguably the SMP in practice.
Female mean = the total available females in theory, e.g. including the married, the aged, the ill and the celibate.
You see the issue? They’re all lumped together, the data isn’t stratified correctly. Deliberately.
Even a bar chart based on partner count or sexual frequency in a week would be illuminating.
However, the number of count for slutty males must be even higher, because as not-practicing women hold down the slutty average, the number of non-practicing men hold down the manwhore mean too.

dean winchester supernatural evil smirk lol laughing amused

Isn’t science fun?

This accurately traces the perils of lumping the sexes in together, obscuring mating patterns which crossover i.e. promiscuity. Further data computation was required to assess this question.

Obviously none of this data includes rape or other sexual crimes.
Accusing all men of being rapists is exactly as stupid as accusing all women of being whores. They’re both over-reactions designed to defame the opposite sex’s reputation from different sides (take/be taken, force/choose). Instead it cleverly plays on an old question Can a whore be raped?

Nobody mentions this. So I have to.