A fairytale about female desire

http://uncabob.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/hypergamy-fisherman-and-his-wife.html

Hypergamy is bullshit.

Sexually, it applies far more to men than it ever could to women. All the sayings we have about getting around are like “men sowing their wild oats” and “trading in for a younger model”. No healthy woman does it. It doesn’t appeal. If anything, the evidence tells us that men are the hypergamous sex, but I still think the term is bullshit. Projection is annoying for the rest of us.

It’s a combination of two things, which are conflated.

  1. r-type promiscuity. r-types think everyone is as morally weak as they are. Of course everyone is a powderkeg of lust who’d never settle down given ample opportunity. /sarc
  2. ambition. Ambition is one of the greatest things a person can have, it’s an intellectual form of hope. A person cannot self-improve without ambition. Not to be confused with hubris or vainglory, which the Left tries to do, to discourage the proles from improving their lot and moving into the Tory voting bracket.

In my experience, those with the delusions of grandeur (read: ALWAYS narcissists) fear responsibility. They desire responsibility, imagined as various titles and powers, because they are the least fit to wield it. So I find this fairytale rather funny, because a woman who went beyond the stone palace  (space to raise children) isn’t a fit wife.

Think of the people who get bossy and always try to be team leader. They must be that way because they’re incompetent and nobody would choose them. Even within a monarchical system, they’d have their heads cut off before the year is out. How many spoiled brat princes did this happen to? Were they alpha, when they couldn’t control their base desires? Narcissists fail to account for the desires (and needs) of others in their daydreams. It doesn’t just apply to women. There is no woman who daydreamed about being a Genghis Khan. How many more ambitious men exist than women? Yes, it’s rooted in testosterone, partially.

Women evolved to desire resources because their lives would often depend on it. Whether their children would starve or survive a winter. Whether they could pay protection money as a serf. It’s as futile to critique a woman for desiring SOME resources (sufficient for a purpose) as to criticize men for having any form of sexual desire. For a lot of supposed redpills, they sure do expect women and men to act and think alike when it comes to sex-specific subjects.

Gratitude is abundant in non-narcissists. Narcissists are made an example of in these types of stories.
Just because you want something doesn’t mean you deserve it. Whether you deserve a thing is judged, yes, JUDGED, by others. Others who will see the narcissist for the coward they are. If such people do gain power, the People enact terrible revenge against the tyrant.

Inferior v Superior People

Interesting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Bergeron

They are anti-evolution, in my opinion. Especially the evolution of humans (a SPECIES, not a ‘race’) and our psyche. They want the power of an adult with none of the responsibilities, an intellectualized infantilisation exercise. ( narcissist r-types: http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/where-modern-r-amygdalae-meet-ancient-k-amygdalae/ ) They are calling for a cull, a genocide on a racial level (beige people) but on an intellectual, emotional plane as well. Giftedness genocide, I think of it, much like mass immigration is a form of cultural cuckoldry, they wish to use humanity as the melting pot and petri dish for their ideology, they’re more authoritarian than Hitler. They are naïve enough of biological determinism (they refuse it exists, honestly, ask them) to expect humans are tabula rasa and can be totally rewritten. They don’t want to simply kill people (#killallmen) they wish to do something far worse – strip us of our humanity and individuality. Evolved differences? Let’s scrub those nasty things away with science! and play God. #Frankenstein

Communists fail when they misunderstand human motivation. Reaction formation, idiots. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment Behavioural psychology, conditioning, feedback and response loops IN THE BRAIN.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Envy#Narcissists
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tall_poppy_syndrome

One of the most common examples is a woman who is envious of another’s beauty, such as in the fairy tale “Snow White“, in which the Queen is envious of Snow White’s youth and beauty, and seeks to kill the young woman in order to once again be the “fairest of them all”. ~ anti-feminism propaganda before it was a thing

Human value is relative to the competition. In bowing to the Third World from fake white guilt, the Original Sin of Whiteness, they become the slaves to the people outcompeting them for those plum jobs, even in STEM. They are losers whining about the need for a social species to rank by hierarchy because in each category they fail.

As I said in a ROQ article, social justice is anti-social revenge.

“Vanity well fed is benevolent. Vanity hungry is spiteful.” ~ Mason Cooley

They have what used to be called vainglory, and it is futile. It attempts to bring down others by falsely boosting the self. Identity politics.

On the other hand, I’m still pissed off with Cappy for this one he did while I was off demurely sipping tea –

Psychology has 3 problems

1. liars are allowed to push their politics i.e. feminist psychology, really. It exists. We acknowledge the problem and are presently pulling out the SJW weeds. http://pps.sagepub.com/content/7/5/504.abstract

2. aimless idiots are allowed in and prefer soft course material over brutal reality aka science. (I believe this is the bone of contention).

3. anything claiming to be psychology is considered it. Most of the present material is a liberal art but it’s tarring the real scientists with that brush to say it’s a stupid subject when there are highly scientific branches vital to an aging population (neurology, gerontology) and our technological needs (computational neuroscience, possibly AGI).