“We need multiculturalism for the economy” lie

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-03/u-k-s-productivity-depression-is-unparalleled-in-250-years
Worst slow-down since 1760-1800.


Dare you to look at the welfarites as a percentage, Bloomberg. Compare the demographics historically, compare them! The welfarites on pensions are the worst, tanking us the same as Rome.

No Shit Central: When you allow companies to import workers from literally everywhere, the domestic workers go jobless.
Also, why try? as many have told me, when they’re discriminated against for being white.
If you’ll never get the promotion, why work hard?

Guess the deportations can commence without fear of Muh GDP.

Diversity is our strength, look at GDP! So good for companies, it must be enforced by the State!

Repeal the Race Relations Act and let people hire by MERIT.

Remember, as national IQ drops, so does GDP.

You can’t really threaten high IQ people (nationally nor individually), we’ll just scale down production to shake off the leeches like a dog shaking off fleas. I said in Best Post, we’re on strike.

Sorry I gibs no spare shekels to your share price, Mr Banker Man.

Tax capital gains fairly (at min. parity) or the income workers won’t bother.

Diversity is the death of productivity.

I promised a year or two ago I’d “deep dive” on our economy but data like abortions, crime, drug abuse isn’t actually really collected, let alone available. Coincidence?

Hate yourself for the global corporations (oikophobia)

Our? Rs are a minority. Considering the “Far” Left (current Left) mental illness rates, it could legitimately be considered a symptom of mental disease. Genophilia is perfectly natural and normal, statistically.

‘Oikophobia’: Our Western Self-Hatred

We used to just call them traitors and banish them to a colony. It works. You love foreigners so much? Live over there forever, no takebacksies.
Here’s a little secret: the more you love your country, the less you care about companies. To find the biggest globalist, find a guy covered head to toe in brands: iPhone, Beats, Nike etc. Brands are their family. Sad!
It’s a subversive replacement of patriarchy with a cold, hard, corporate cock.

Africans fell for it first, for that reason. No dad? Wear all the brands. ALL of them.

Gee, why are young people so into luxury brands? I guess they’re just vain. Why aren’t they having long family dinners? Where did their father abandon them to? Overtime? The bar? A second Kardashian type family? Neglect is abuse, Boomers!

Credit: Stop being a pleb

The airplane company had such a backlash for a simple reason.

Why do you think airlines are struggling to make sales?

Well, if your country is already flooded with foreigners, why travel?

There’s no lure, they’re not exotic. From experience, you know how entitled and unclean they are. Why spend all that money to be around more of them?

Socialists are the most capitalist people, but deluded about it, they replaced their own family with brands. Hollywood is one of many, look at the Harry Potter fandom for a prime example. Sip your slave-grown Starbucks slosh and tap into your nightmare screen made by suicidal slaves, while tweeting about the evils of slavery. Corporate cucks.

Major rapist caught, imagine my shock

Yet another Asian targeting whites.

And the homo stereotypes turn out to be true, surprise.
Yes, they want straights.
Yes, they’re befriending you to rape you later, because then nobody will believe you (gay means happy psyops) or they can cry ‘hate crime’. The “homophobia” bullshit is a way of gaslighting male rape victims. It’s like “Nice Guys” befriending women for the same access. Men must be warned as well as women how predators work. Shame the predators, not the victims. Any guy defending the predators (or hybristophiliac woman, at times) must be shamed or considered one of them. Rapists don’t actually have a sexuality, as extreme r, this needs to be more widely known. That’s why they flip flop from raping women or girls as easier physical targets until they rape thinner or drugged men in prison, or randomly attack animals (yes, like a serial killer but also no, worse).

They should separate prisoners by crime, all the rapists in one building. It’s only fair.

My heart goes out to those poor men and this subhuman should be put against a wall and shot for crimes against humanity. Rapists aren’t actually human. They’re sexual sadists, that is untermensch. Whether they target adults or kids doesn’t matter, that’s actually a matter of availability, they’re missing the human bit of their brain, it’s more than empathy, it’s an impulse of a predator to destroy humans in the most personal way. We put a dog down for biting a human ONCE, what of intimate crimes?

The more you let sluts brag about their ‘conquests’, the more this will happen, since it gives rapists (always narcissistic) a socially desirable license to brag, like a serial killer revisits their crime, serial rapists are proud to gloat about their ‘seductive’ prowess. [Look up the definition of seduction, things the person doesn’t actually want to do, where they don’t actually consent but Hollywood has conditioned us into thinking that’s fine. It isn’t. ]

Keeping sex taboo for polite society (hell, to anyone but your spouse and doctor) actually reduced the amount of rape by removing a key incentive for that attacker, street cred. Why don’t they teach this in Sex Ed? So they can back up the rapists culturally (all hybristophiliac SJWs do) and claim all ‘sex’ is consensual. This is insane.

Sodomy used to be a crime for this reason, do you think most sodomites actually consented to that? Their pozz parties are famous for drugging under-age twinks or holding men down. That’s why they wear all the fetish shit to parades, it’s what they are, they’re proud of it. This’ll get memory-holed. If over a hundred women had been anally raped (a reason they normalised it) then the SJWs wouldn’t shut up, rightfully so for once. I doubt the MRAs are going to support these men to one tenth of that, because they don’t actually care about the men, it’s all about hating exclusively white women (how original, they sound like the Guardian) under the banner of multicultural ‘brotherhood’, a globalist replacement for nationalism to prevent real change and red-pilling. Clearly, events like this show it can’t work out. As I predicted, if all these ‘bro’ types moved to an island and no evil ‘white’ women were allowed, the rapists would just prey on them, as they do in prison, the military or during SHTF civil war events. Men need support but it must be national, grassroots and nothing bitter about the opposite sex, because it’s nothing to do with that. Most attacks on men are also done by men, it’s a sad fact. [Yes pedo teachers should be hanged too, duh.]

What the MeToo detractors totally missed is that plenty of men are victims of these men as well.

Rapists get off on the attack itself, a lot of them don’t care what sex you are but since men aren’t warned about rapists like a viable threat, they’re usually more vulnerable with “binge drinking lad culture”. It’s absurd as saying thieves won’t attack the poor. You might not be their preferential target due to body strength but if pickings are slim they will, so we must be taught about rapists in Sex Ed. Hook-up “culture” also gives them the ‘consensual’ excuse, even when the target is religious or a different sexuality. We’re all presumed to be degenerates in court, this is wrong. Enough of this, the Victorians didn’t put up with this. We’re the only time the First World is actually pro-criminal in practice and trying to ask the victims to do the impossible, prove a negative. You can’t prove something WASN’T consensual (that’s why modern rapists use the line) so to use that as a defense should be invalid (unless they have positive proof). That’s how logic works. Now the legal system is gaslighting men on the subject of consent, maybe this’ll get the review it needs, like calling the rape slavery victims a “lifestyle choice”.

Most offences of rape, as here, are done by the same small pool of rapists. Like most murder is committed by serial killers but written up by instance, if we simply brought back hanging for this very select, small group, those crimes would be pretty much eradicated overnight. We can’t say that about anything else.

I haz questions.

Is rape evil? Yes.
Is slavery evil? Yes.
Is porn the acceptable cover for exploiting trafficked slaves? Yes, statistically. Check with the charities and research.
Is it the entire demand behind slavery, for public profit? Yes, statistically. Check with the charities and research. There is no product without demand.
Should the government shoot all those involved in slavery? Yes. As public deterrent. Also audit for corruption and confiscate past funds.
Would porn still exist? ..No. Not new, Western porn.

Huh.

Does Porn/Hollywood (hardcore/soft) pay taxes on the money it admits to making? No.
Does porn cause known neurological issues such as hypofrontality? Yes.
Can those be reversed? Usually a little but not fully. Window of opportunity during development. Neural pruning.
Is it used to groom/corrupt children? Yes. In every case.
Is it being progressively normalised as softcore with the slippery slope over time into ‘Hollywood’? Yes.

See “The Kiss” scandal. Now adverts portray children passionately kissing. No chaste cheek pecks. Not anymore. Did you notice? A non-porn user would. Then there’s the obvious subversion:

If that happened in the 1950s, what would happen to the people who made that video?

1850s, what would happen to the producers and distributors?

What is that video, which was screen-capped from?

Did you immediately know it for what it was?

Why not?

You think you haven’t seen child porn.. but they start subtle.

This is cognitive dissonance.

Is watching rape legal? No. Aiding and abetting, duty to intervene or report.
Should watching filmed rape of trafficking victims be legal? No.
How can you tell the difference?

Trick question, there isn’t one.

Deliberately.

A non-groomed person capable of consent simply refuses to produce such videos. It is a symptom of a warped mind.

Is the purpose of porn sexual humiliation? Yes. Both viewer (Jesus warned of voyeurism’s evil and we all know about the cucks) and serial rape victim (see life outcomes of that trauma unless you’re a Guardian lefty, look for them).

Is it legal to violate your own human right to intimate privacy? Is it possible? This seal can only be broken ONCE. Consider Hollywood celebrities who strip off in films and imitate sexual acts for money. If their ‘nude photos’ aka intentionally created porn, are released, how can they be outraged? Category error prevails. There’s something lost already, they already withdrew their right to that type of privacy, their violation has been publicly witnessed. Apart from expected privacy (fair) of the photos themselves and profit of the photos themselves, what is the issue? Stigma. Like calling a porn “star” a whore when there’s video evidence. Category error. How can a celebrity with a ‘sex tape’ not be fair game for public scrutiny of who they’re fucking in future? Surely this becomes public information, acceptable fodder? You can’t have it both ways. Right to publicity has limits e.g. crime taking place, public interest in that. They surrendered that sanctity of intimacy by their own volition.

For the ‘define porn’ crowd – salacious nudity in particular situations intended to stimulate the libido. Most people wouldn’t even pose nude for an art class, finding that alone too ‘degrading’ (objectification for non-sexual purposes). Women used to produce ‘porn’ (really erotica) all the time minus the nudity condition for their husbands alone. Men didn’t carry around cameos of their wife’s face for sentimental purposes. That way, it isn’t cheating, since she can satisfy his libido on long journeys when she isn’t present to do it herself. Isn’t this, moral? So you can’t forget the issue of audience: purpose and anonymity. You can’t suddenly pick and choose who sees your material of published crassness if it’s hypothetically offered up to the world. That audience consideration is either supporting a relationship or degrading.

Middle-class white-washing of perversion pisses me off. It isn’t an art film, it’s a skin flick with subtitles.

WW2 guys encouraged to paint their planes started this.

Now rap is played to kids, subtitles of porn: ooh, aaah, yes, baby.

Targeted sexualisation of children already has a name: grooming.

Can masturbation be outlawed? No. Don’t be absurd. Strawman.
Does a healthy man need “porn” to do so? No. That is erectile dysfunction, or impotence as it used to be known.
Is porn designed as a supernormal stimulus? Yes.
Who principally uses it? Men with a surgically mutilated penis. This has been researched. Look into it.
Why? Psyops. Disenchant the white man. Attract non-whites to our shores also. A baited hook (called hookers).

Is it art? No. Modern art is also psyops. It was admitted (CIA). Meanwhile, how can there be a copyright on sterile reproductive acts, it’s medically impossible. If non-sterile, ancient therefore where is the right to charge for a thing when I can watch two flies fuck outside my window? Claim to exclusive right dismissed, where is the profit, then? Ah, subversion, distraction (bread/circuses) and international mental damage of otherwise stronger populations. Like the SJW hiring and plots.

Are people ashamed to admit they watch it? Yes.

Why? They sense the evil.

Does crime go up or down when porn is highly accessible? It goes up, see attacks on Japan’s schoolgirls for a good example. Predators are inspired by videos and practise mentally with them.

Do incarcerated prisoners show the same pattern? Yes.

Does it reduce libido? No, it actually stokes it (testosterone) and keeps the flame going, most predators have a low IQ and terrible imagination and therefore rely on external stimuli, including stories in forums about how to conduct certain attacks. Pathological populations do not behave as normal ones would predict.

What are the outcomes of porn ‘stars’, when tracked? Trauma, disease and suicide. All antisocial and preventable.
Is participation of the result, an endorsement of all practices related to it? Yes. Unless you’re a hypocrite.

Is the internet for children? No. Parents must be strongly shamed on this point.
Did erotica (the 2d non-damaging form of paper ‘porn’) exist pre-internet? Underground with legal restrictions on access from practicality.
Do kids or parents groom younger kids? Yes. Tragically.
How do they do this? Smartphones, mostly.
Do the search engines push this material on children? Yes.
Is general smartphone use in minors medically harmful? In many ways, yes.

Why aren’t smartphones/computers age restricted in sale and use? …..Apple stocks.

Customizing for wider market access, how shockingly libertarian.

And everyone gains in freedom from the situation, so it’ll never happen.

Remember degenerates, you’re probably watching people trafficked as kids, being raped.

Enjoy.

[postmodern r-types are BTFO by this line, it’s been field tested on Guardian types for maximum potency]

Think about it, what is a “pimp”? A sex slave owner.

If the threat of a beating or death looms, is that consent, shitlibs? No. No it is not. Coercion vitiates consent, likewise duress to signed contracts.

Bonus: according to whom was the Prohibition a failure?

Hollywood.

What actually happened?

Crime tanked, including rape of adults and children (alcohol is the most common date rape drug used to weaken ability to resist or plain knock kids and lightweights out) and domestic abuse of adults and children went down too (with no oh-so-convenient “drink” excuses). Why weren’t you taught that in school? Why did the People want Prohibition in the first place? They were noticing things. Consider the timing. Pre-Nazi.

As for driving things underground: should they be? Isn’t that better? Wouldn’t the thrill of taboo be better for users too?

Where is the right of healthy people to live without being bombarded by porn? It’s even outside for the “go outside” types, it’s on billboards! We do not consent, it is forced upon our minds. WHY?

How much does the stress of adverts cost us in the health service?

It is in soaps, in adverts, in kid’s films. It doesn’t sell, actually so WHY is it there, WHY isn’t there a choice in whether to consume it knowingly, beforehand? Bring back the CODE, Hollywood fears it.

Even young male toplessness in “kid’s films” would’ve disgusted your recent ancestors. Is nudity always sexual or not, Hollywood? Then why include it, or not? Rationing levels of clothing certainly don’t apply now, do they?

You want high culture? Bring back the laws about what theatres can and cannot show (previously covered). Most people want to go to the theater – if they had ratings systems like films – nudity, political propaganda, sexuality bullshit. We want to see real plays, not facsimile brothel shows. Most plays aren’t selling because we don’t want to see naked strangers, on stage or in the gym, thanks. Goes for most young people, actually. In surveys.

As for the white issue with ‘sexbots’ – they creep us out as lifeless humanoids. It triggers our disgust to necrophilia (or rape of the vulnerable and unconscious). The slow ones in motion and ‘speech’ seem mentally backward, like children (or physically looking like children). A chosen people who produce them and attempt to normalise their use in the MSM do not view the group they resemble as human, so to them it’s more like bestiality and they enjoy it as a sign of their superiority. They also have no historic qualms with rape. First they must produce dependent customers in the out-group by alienating them from the loving thing it seeks to cheaply replace. Seen any bots like that lately? Any youtube comments seem weirdly repetitive or targeted in this direction? Why does youtube allow them? Finally, they seek to monetise the constant online feed of spying data… for updates, of course. There won’t be a Tinder-like database of your fetishes and intimate photos. That’s impossible.

They wuz warned

Never smile at a crocodile.
https://archive.org/details/AProgramForTheJewsAndAnAnswerToAllAntiSemites/page/n99
“For thousands of years the Aryans will work, struggle and achieve; they will clear the swamps, they will bring out a beautiful world, and make mankind a free humanity living on a free earth; but then the Aryans will die.” – Harry Waton, 1939.

One less Lib Dem voter in the world.

I’d rather him die than some innocent little girl get raped.

Being forced down our throats

Gore warning. Even Tufano’s a traitor. Pity, I could’ve found investors but Europe is rejecting halal bullshit. For obvious reasons. Funny couple of clips at end.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/857515/church-schools-serving-halal-meat-to-pupils-claim

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/934454/bbc-countryfile-halal-meat-slaughter-islam-muslims

For context.

Canteens in 27 Lancashire schools attended by 12,000 pupils are dishing up meat from animals not stunned before slaughter.

The list includes Church of England and Catholic schools, and the leader of Lancashire County Council has claimed parents are not being told what their children are eating.

Council chief Geoff Driver told The Times: “My suspicion is that some schools are simply just buying all halal meat because it’s the easiest thing to do.

Abdul Qureshi, LCM chairman, hit back by accusing Mr Driver of embarking on a “crusade” and said Muslims would boycott school meals if the council voted to ban non-stunned meat.

He said: “It will create huge agitation in society and we are already fighting against Islamophobia.”

He said “many, many Muslims” attended Lancashire’s Catholic and Church of England schools.

“Some of them are 50 per cent Muslim, some may be even more.”

Yeah, Muslims are attending Christian schools and trying to impose Muslim “law”.

This was 2017.

What about Christophobia? Why are they allowed to attend?

Lancashire County Council said the decision of what to serve pupils and how much to tell parents about it was made by each school. 

No it’s a consent issue. I’m sure the boards voting have a Common Purpose though.

2018:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/934454/bbc-countryfile-halal-meat-slaughter-islam-muslims

THE BBC has come under fire for broadcasting a segment on Halal meat on Sunday night’s Countryfile with viewers accusing the Corporation of hitting a “new low” and “justifying vile Halal slaughter practices on our soil”.

Mr Heap said: “Like some other religions how the animal is killed is significant and for Muslims that means Halal slaughter in which a blessing is said before the animal dies.

Discussing the practice the Imam said: “There are certain practices where you want to fulfil a commandment of God and you’re basically invoking God’s name upon that. You are making the sacrifice in the name of God and now it’s made Halal. Halal means permissible and it’s been made permissible by God for you.”

It isn’t our God. That’s a violation of our human rights.

Brought up because, 2019

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1167969/EU-news-Belgium-halal-kosher-ban-slaughter-religion-animal-welfare-latest-ecj

BELGIUM is set to challenge European Union laws on halal and kosher slaughter in a court case that could have massive repercussions across the bloc.

The french-speaking region of Wallonia, on September 1, will become the second Belgian authority to ban halal and kosher slaughter in a move to ban killing animals without first stunning them.

It’s barbaric. They try to call it “traditional” in our news propaganda but it isn’t traditional here, it doesn’t belong here and never will. Also, the Muslim religion is so young it should barely merit anyone’s consideration.

Flanders first introduced a ban, which came into effect on New Year’s Day, on the Muslim and Jewish ways of ritually slaughtering animals. Critics of the ban have suggested the move comes as part of a shift to an anti-immigrant shift across Belgium as the right-wing Flemish nationalists continue to cement themselves in mainstream politics.

Or Europe wants to be European? If they don’t like it, fuck off home.

While the court could take up to two years, any decision could set a precedent for the whole of the European Union.

A number of EU countries, such as Denmark, Sweden and Denmark, have banned traditional slaughter without stunning.

But the court challenge will test European laws between animal welfare and religious freedoms across the bloc.

The freedom not to eat that shit?

Mohamed Bouezmarni, the head of the Muslin association in the town of Arlon, has warned bans could drive the ritual slaughter underground.

He told Politico: “Everyone will do it at home, or in some corner, hidden from view.

Grounds for deportation.

“I think that is not the animal activist’s aim.”

Pinchas Goldschmidt, the president of the Conference of European Rabbis, warned Jews were left as “collateral damage” while bans targeted the Muslim community.

Go home to Judea. Nobody cares.

Europeans want their continent to have our own people’s practices.

That’s our birthright.

comment

If you go to Y. Tube and look up hal al slaughter you will see the horrific abuse these animals are put through , they are kicked , thrown about , and the sheer terror is plain to see in the animals. This barbaric practice is abhorrent , worse till in moos lime countries , were people, including children stand and watch, laughing at the terrified animals, and blood running down the streets .

I have seen it for real in a slaughter house about 50 years ago. The animal to be killed and those in close proximity can hear, smell and sense it and the cries and screams they make is awful to hear and see them struggling. The problem with the meat though is that any animal that suffers unnecessary or undue stress means that their bloodstream is packed with endorphins that are released and it is said that the meat does not taste as good as it would do if not stunned first in a calmer environment. Personally I would rather limit the practice so that the majority of the population who are non-participants of those faiths know that animals were killed humanely.

aka civilization? yeah, we have a bias to that

It’s also more bitter and tough from the adrenaline, a taste the East prefers, so you can’t even justify from a taste perspective.

They are pure scum these people that put animals through this type of abuse.,

Unfortunately, these backward peoples do not share our thoughts about cruelty to animals. They seem to gain some pleasure from maintaning the practice on the grounds that the man with a child bride said so. Obscene.

You forgot the part where he ordered his son to divorce so he could rape the wife. What Muslims call visions were literally just lucid dreams, it’s demonic to pass that off as religion.

Islam and Judaism, the kiddy rape religions.

High time the UK also banned these cruel practices. If a persons religion stops them from eating non-Halal meat they can become vegetarians

It’s laughable seeing Butchers trying to make Halal Slaughter look good

Ritual and Slaughter are two words that should never be combined in anything considered legal. It is illegal for very good reasons and there should be no exceptions.

They merely practice on non-human animals.

With Kosher, we all know Jack the Ripper. That’s why he killed them by the neck, a tricky thing unless you’re a halal/kosher butcher. There are multiple tough layers of tissue. He ate Mary Kelly’s face.

Take a good, long, hard look. Should this ritualistic killing practice be legal in the First World?

And that guy tried the same thing on the non-jew mother of his child.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/09/26/21st-century-blood-libel/

His name literally sounded like libel.

“ripping parts of her face off and draining her of all her blood in their Hollywood apartment”

same as Mary Kelly

An autopsy found she was tortured for eight agonising hours before she died from her injuries.

from https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4550817/was-hollywoods-worst-ever-murder-predicted-by-millionaire-killers-graphic-novel-featuring-a-female-character-being-brutally-murdered-and-drained-of-blood/

What does that look like?

Allow them to train in this and it’s probable they’ll use it on you once they have numbers.

From the recent murder:

Her skull was exposed after parts of her scalp and one ear were either cut or ripped away.

Or chewed off.

According to the Toronto Sun, Dr James Ribe of the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office said: “I have never seen this before.

“And I doubt hardly any forensic pathologists in this country or abroad have even seen this, outside of, perhaps, wartime … it’s extremely rare.

“[Her] entire scalp was traumatically absent and was not found, was not present with the body.”

The report shows there was also an injury to Kasian’s jaw that appeared to be human bite marks.

Those are similar to Kelly.

So this religious sacrifice stuff is not trivial.

comment from Express paper

One way to deal with it is to mark all food that is halal as such, and no meat prepared where ANY halal slaughter happens is marked as halal. Then we, the non barbaric people of the planet, can refuse to buy any halal meat and avoid all shops where halal is sold.

They want to deceive.

For example all NZ lamb is halal, ALL of it. But this is not marked. And if you ask any of the major supermarkets if they can guarantee that any particular cut of meat they produce is or is not halal they cannot guarantee this. Why? Because they are scared. Let us make them scared of going broke!

The law is already there. They need a legal case.

A fine point here

Imagine the debate if freedom of religion was extended to people following the Incas’ religion. Should the human victims be stunned before their hearts are ripped out?

Yeah, that’s the point. You’re training up executioners. Just in case a One World Religion were forced on us at any point.

Our supermarkets should be legally obliged to label meat which is halal/kosher so that as consumers we can make an informed view as to whether or not to buy it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_protection_in_the_United_Kingdom

https://www.simplybusiness.co.uk/knowledge/articles/2017/03/sale-of-goods-legislation-consumer-rights-act-guide-for-small-businesses/

“Under the Consumer Rights Act, traders have certain obligations when they supply goods (including digital products) to a consumer. This basically means that your business has to comply with certain rules when you sell things to customers.

Under the legislation, the products you sell must:

  • be of a satisfactory quality
  • be fit for purpose
  • match the description
  • be installed correctly, if installation was part of the contract”

Implying non-Halal when it isn’t, is a violation. Deception by omission.

There are others but I can’t be bothered to go hunting when it’s obvious. Transparency is vital.

comment

if they want this kind of slaughtered babaricly meat, go to your country of ancestry. too much of muslim and jewish ways are being forced on us.

The Jews made up Islam to weaponise against Christian Europe, study up.

The child rape exemption is a critical similarity. Oddly similar ages and everything.

Non-Muslims can’t have Halal, it’s idolatry and an animal sacrifice when Jesus was the last sacrifice. But Muslims can eat Kosher…. it’s the same religion. Atheists also have a right to abstain from these products, it’s basic consent.

from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27324224 :

“During the process, a Muslim will recite a dedication, know as tasmiya or shahada.”

“Tesco says the only difference between the halal meat it sells and other meat is that it was blessed as it was killed.”

“Blessed?” Are you serious? No wonder their company is tanking.

Ever since this came out, 2014, people are boycotting.

They’ve lost clean half their pricing.

“Stunning of livestock has been mandatory in the the EU since 1979, although member states can grant exemptions for religious slaughter.

Note: Member…. states… not nations. Sections of EU Empire.

Some countries, including Denmark, have opted to ban non-stunning slaughter altogether. The UK government says it has no intention of banning religious slaughter.”

How many Gov petitions can you ban? Can we reach Brexit Party for comment?

“Jewish law strictly forbids the use of stunning and meats are not blessed in the same way.

Unlike for halal, kashrut does not require God’s name to be said before every slaughter after an initial blessing.”

Not our God. Who is we?

“Currently, there is no requirement for halal or kosher meat to be specifically labelled.”

False, trades description act and various consumer protection laws as well as religious rights to decline consent (it’s idolatry to any other religion so Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist etc).

The laws are right there. You are neglecting the population and animal rights in refusing to enforce them. There’s a negligence here bordering on criminal “oversight”.

Slight detour but relevant. #######

Presumed consent with organs is also a violation. Will you care when they book your euthanasia appointment? The boat people need transplants, evil Anglo. You had an unlicensed opinion and the diversity board has voted to terminate you with extreme prejudice. Yet nobody is asking in the run-up to this election. A country of sheep led to slaughter.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-45056780

“If passed, it is expected to come into effect in England in spring 2020 – because the timetable for its introduction will allow for a year of “transition” to the new law.”

“Under the new law, those who do not wish to donate their organs will still be able to opt out via the register and by using an NHS app that launches at the end of the year.”

Opt-outs make “errors” and bodies are raped anyway (yes, it’s organ rape, the forcible seizure or taking), found hollowed-out when checked. We won’t gut you, trust the app! What if they don’t have access to the app? Old phone, no phone? Even the Nazis didn’t do this shit.

“Currently, fewer than half of families give consent for their loved one’s organs to be donated if they are unaware of their wishes, and ministers hope that the new system will encourage people to make their wishes known before their death”

They’re going to over-ride the families with it.

“Under the new plans, specialist nurses will be on hand to discuss donation with families after a loved one dies.” Guilt-tripping the grief stricken, shame on them. And define “dies” because viable organs are still alive at the point they’re ripped out, it’s murder. So after it’s proclaimed dead but not biologically?

“We need to address myths and misconceptions around donation, and we will only do this by having informed debate and dialogue, which I hope will be fostered by these proposals.”

Are all NHS doctors obligated by oath to donate? No? Huh. Funny that. All politicians signing this in at least? Why won’t this register be public? It would reduce errors.

Consent to donate, comrade. We won’t kill you. Here, take a shiny cutesy death card and await treatment for twelve hours before we suspiciously put you/r loved one on a Death Care Pathway (still done).

What’s to stop ‘mistakes’ when they plant cards on people who didn’t want it? You can’t ask questions, the state owns your body. China is a human rights monster, remember?

“We must have a full, consistent public education system with faith groups, schools, colleges, universities, and with the public as well,” she said.

Revelations doesn’t apply to you if you’ve been butchered. I do wonder if the cannibals are planning on nicking a lot of this organ meat. I find it odd Jimmy Saville wanted to be left alone in NHS morgues with fresh human corpses.

We live in Hell, I’m 99% sure. Gaslighting kids to donate their organs when 3D printing exists but they’re too cheap to do it (despite a rejection rate of zero). Lord, please destroy socialism soon.

#######

Consent to your destruction, all this says. If you think it isn’t related, including the Cannibalism for Global Warming initiative, you haven’t been paying attention.

From above:

“The HFA says many slaughterhouses will have chosen to move to halal processes so they do not lose Muslim customers.
The latest census suggests there are 2.7 million Muslims in the UK, with a spending power estimated in the region of £20bn.”

Latest was done almost ten years ago.

“Jewish and Muslim leaders agree, and have called for “comprehensive labelling” of meat.”

THEN WHY ISN’T THIS ACTED UPON. WE NEED COMMENT PRE-ELECTION.

Especially since this is EU related and we had Parliament petitions.

Halal video.

https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=545_1345800806

Five minutes but grisly.

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=EsCJ_1566751879

Abigail Ward, 16, who attends Gildredge House school in Eastbourne, East Sussex, was told by exam board OCR that she had made ‘obscene racial comments’ while answering her Religious Studies exam in June.

On the subject of halal butchers, the student had written, ‘…which I find absolutely disgusting.’

Speaking to The Sunday Telegraph, the 36-year-old said the family were shocked by the decision to disqualify her daughter, and the exam board has since been overturned the decision.

Have an opinion until you can’t.

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=44b_1487932189

Rat being tapped out of a halal animal like it’s normal. The conditions are disgusting and we’ve seen people filming in the places here, videos on the paper websites, with loud music terrifying the animals and what looks like shit everywhere because they were so terrified.

As far from clean as possible.

http://www.dialrel.eu/images/veterinary-concerns.pdf

The prevalence of animals with bilateral false aneurysms was 7 and 8 percent for
Shechita and Halal slaughter, respectively, whereas no false aneurysms occurred during
bleeding in cattle that were electrically stunned and simultaneously developed a cardiac arrest.
The authors concluded that combination of false aneurysms and collateral routes to the brain
present a risk of sustained consciousness during religious slaughter in cattle.

….Velarde et al. (2003) showed that lambs that were hoisted and bled without being stunned, lost
less blood from the sticking wound than lambs that were electrically stunned (250 V, 50 Hz,
3 s), hoisted and then stuck.

aka the more European way

The authors mentioned as a likely explanation that the muscle
contractions associated with electrical stunning forced blood away from skeletal muscles
towards the vessels in the thorax and abdomen.

And other proof of its inhumanity. 80 pages of it.

Aspiration of blood and refluxing gut content after the incision was considered a welfare
concern after slaughter without stunning. Though this problem was mainly associated with the
inverted position, it occurred with the upright position for both Halal and Shechita slaughter
(Gregory et al., 2009). The authors examined bovine respiratory tracts following Shechita and
Halal slaughter without stunning, and also in captive bolt stunned animals. During all the
treatments animals received the cut in the upright position. The study found blood lining the
inner aspect of the trachea in 19% of the Shechita, 58% of the Halal and 21% of the
stunned/cut cattle. Blood was found in the upper bronchi of 36% of Shechita, 69% of Halal
and 31% of stunned/cut cattle. Ten percent of the Shechita, 19% of the Halal and 0% of the
stunned/cut cattle had fine bright red blood-tinged foam in the trachea. Blood covering the
larynx was recorded for all cattle. It was concluded that concerns about suffering from airway
irritation by blood could apply in animals that are either not stunned before slaughter or do
not lose consciousness rapidly whilst blood is present in the respiratory tract (Gregory et al.,
2009). These concerns are based on the fact that fluid in the respiratory tract in conscious
animals leads to irritation of sensory receptors lining the airway, and in particular the
receptors on the glottis and the carina of the trachea. In animals with intact vagus nerves there
could have been a cough or expulsion reflex, but coughing would be absent when the vagi had
been severed (Canning, 2007) though lower airway irritation may still occur through
sympathetic-spinal afferent pathways (Quin et al., 2007).

Again animals are put into these restrainers by hand and the head is supported
by hand during and after the cut. Sheep have been observed shackled by one leg (Catanese et
al., 2009; Cenci Goga et al., 2009) before sticking for Kosher slaughter (up to 17 kg
liveweight, line speed exceeded 200 sheep/ h) and for Halal slaughter (sheep up to 55 kg
liveweight, line speed could exceed 150 sheep/ h). Shackling time averages ranged between 1
and 4 minutes before performance of the cut, but can reach 5 minutes if the time was needed
to sharpen the knife or if the operator had to approach first to perform the cut. During
shackling before sticking some sheep hung calmly whereas others struggled. Struggling was
increased if a sheep touched another struggling sheep. Sheep reactions also included turning
the head to the side and apparently looking around, kicking with the hind leg and vigorous
struggling including movements of the whole body. In the last case, the movements were
thought to be escape behaviour. Struggling and vocalisation sometimes occurred in response
to the cut.

Vocalising in sheep sound like a child screaming MAAAAA for its mother, it’s eerie and almost human.

Keep eating halal and telling yourself it’s okay.

The whole paper is kinda like that. The animals beg to be let go, that’s probably why they like it.

Other methods are to place the bird in a cone before performing the cut or placing the birds in lateral
recumbency for Halal slaughter. According to Dialrel experience, restraining poultry for
Shechita was performed manually or by shackling chickens and turkeys before cutting,
although the latter was not according to kosher rules. During shackling chickens could hang
calmly or show wing flapping which in some cases was vigorous and long lasting.

Less suffering huh?

Liars.

Including Halal Tufano. Don’t buy from him, he doesn’t even put it on his FAQs.

https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2016/04/11/GUEST-ARTICLE-US-halal-food-regulations-Are-you-up-to-speed

“Multiple states have enacted statutes in recent years to regulate the halal food industry and to prevent mislabeling and deceptive practices”.

Deceptive practices, huh?

Yeah, those are awful.

https://frankiesfreerangemeat.com/pages/about-us

“Integrity and Accountability”

“The lack of honesty and accountability in the current market for naturally raised animal products has driven me to provide people a product they can find their true health with.”

“We will be sourcing meat from farmers raising animals for us to these quality standards.”

Highest quality Halal cuckery. You have to write to him before he’ll admit it, which is illegal.

Halal signage be displayed where an establishment sells both halal and non-halal products”

As is that. He doesn’t label and it’s meant to be per product like with allergies.

Trust no cuck, [bonus gifs at end] you actually have to seek this out even from people who pretend not to be snowflakes. It’s sad I know this legal side and Americans don’t… or pretend not to. No document disclosure either.

NEW YORK “All food items must also have a halal label affixed to them when they are packaged and being sold as such”

You know they have to hire Muslims to do it too right?

“Slaughter by a Muslim”

So they’re isolating the food industry from Westerners.

When sheep are group stunned in a pen, they may hide their heads under animals which makes it difficult to correctly place the electrodes.

The average number of cuts as reported by Gregory et al. (2008) was 3.2 cuts during Shechita
and 5.2 cuts during Halal slaughter of cattle.

The one cut propaganda is a LIE.

In sheep, according to the experience of the Dialrel WP2 members, the minimum number of cuts required to sever the major blood vessels of the neck for Halal (without stunning) and kosher slaughter ranged from 1 to 6. For cattle

either one or up to 60 sweeps of knife have been found.

Up to 60.

Religion of cruelty.

For poultry usually one cut was
performed. Additionally to multiple cuts, after withdrawing the knife from the wound,
additional cuts were sometimes performed during Kosher and Halal slaughter. Each time the
knife touches the surface of the wound the potential exists for further nociceptor activation.
Even if the knife blade is twice as long as the width of the throat, there are limitations to cut
the neck of large cattle with a small number of cuts. This is due to the fact that according to
the area to be cut the length of the blade increases disproportionately depending on the
pressure that can be applied by the operator (Adams and Sheridan, 2008).
Especially in sheep but also in cattle an additional aspect may be thick wool or coat, which
may have to be parted before the cut. Otherwise this would constrain the blade during cutting
and could cause blunting of the blade. Blunt blades are especially welfare relevant if the neck
is not sufficiently stretched to fixate the flexible skin around the neck of sheep or cattle
(Wenzlawowicz and Holleben, 2007).

As for the painless lie, will you settle for EEG?

Measurement of the electrical activity of the brain to assess noxious stimuli has been
described in chapter 2.6.2. Recent advancements in electrophysiology have allowed
quantitative analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) in response to painful/noxious
sensory input, allowing the experience of pain to be more precisely assessed in humans and
animals. This methodology has been applied to the question of pain during slaughter of calves
by ventral-neck incision. In a series of experiments the results showed clear evidence for the
first time that the act of slaughter by ventral-neck incision is associated with noxious
stimulation that would be expected to be perceived as painful in the period between the
incision and loss of consciousness (Mellor et al., 2009). First the use of changes in the EEG
power spectral and a minimal anaesthesia model was validated for the assessment of noxious
sensory input using amputation dehorning as a noxous stimulus (Gibson et al., 2007). Then
the model was used to investigate the impact of ventral-neck incision without prior stunning
(Gibson et al., 2009b). The results demonstrated that ventral neck incision produced changes
in the EEG indicating that it was a noxious stimulus and therefore could be perceived as
painful in conscious animals. This was then confirmed in the second study addressing the
question whether the EEG responses after ventral neck incision were due primarily to the
cutting of neck tissues or to interruption of blood flow to and from the brain. The results
demonstrated that the predominant noxious stimulus was cause by the transection of neck
tissue not the loss of blood flow to and from the brain (Gibson et al., 2009a). In sheep there is
no direct EEG data that demonstrates pain in response to the cut, however based on the
physiological similarities between sheep and cattle, it stands to reason that the neck cut in non
stunned sheep will cause pain (Hemsworth et al., 2009).

The animal cruelty people are right on this one. This is why we fully stun.

Nerves severed during the neck cut have been described by Gregory (2004, page 96) to be
able to proceed signals for up to 4 seconds.

A lifetime in neuroscience. The time dilation of the stress alone would make it seem like five minutes.

Direct activation of neurones during transection of
the nerve results in an intense but brief injury discharge in the afferent nerves. The overall
effect is likely to be a sense of shock, comparable to an electric shock.

Uhuh…. convenient metaphor.

Subsequently, undamaged nerve endings and also nociceptors in the neck wound respond if stimulated or disturbed especially from cold drafts and mechanical effects depending on the way the wound is managed before consciousness will be lost (Gregory, 2005b; Gregory, 2004). Nerve
conduction velocities ensure that activation of brain centres following major cutting injury
occurs within milliseconds. Therefore, the potential experience of pain is directly relevant to
the events following the neck cut (Hemsworth et al., 2009).

It’s evil.

During the Dialrel spot visits even under apparently optimum conditions, reactions to the cut
as vocalising or exhaling (as long as the trachea was intact), retracting movements, struggling
or shivering have been found especially in cattle during Halal and Shechita slaughter without
stunning in both turning pens and upright systems. Reactions in sheep have been observed as

struggling directly after the cut but also shivering. Reactions of poultry have been retraction
movements and wing flapping.

You can’t pretend it’s better.

In conclusion it can be stated with the utmost probability that animals feel pain during the
throat cut without prior stunning. Whereas the actual cut itself can only be evaluated using
behavioural signs, questions remain about standardisation of cutting techniques. Because in
all probability animals are able to experience pain during and after the cut, the question of
duration of consciousness is very important. This applies as well for a smooth cut performed
by a skilled operator.

Cut, singular? Up to sixty!

Risk factors for increased pain include increased number of changes of
direction of the cut, increased number of cuts, wound manipulation (e.g. second cut),
insufficient length of the blade, increased cutting time, a blunt blade, nicks on the blade,
increased diameter of the neck, increased flexibility of the skin due to insufficient tension of
the neck tissue during the cut, thick wool or coat and excitable animals.

Is there such a thing as a non-excitable animal?

Section 4.1.2 goes into loss of consciousness.

It is also possible that animals regain consciousness during bleeding (see chapter 2.8 and also below). The duration of overall consciousness is of particular importance

I’ll stop here, you get the gist.

I’m too disgusted.

some bonus Halal Tufano GIFs/vids, I have the video footage but can’t upload it here on this site.

“happy”? lying or deceiving?

Halal is also cheaper to produce because it’s so inhumane and has fewer equipment requirements.

I know film people and they send me videos, GIFs and stuff. The irony of those two clips together with the same Old Hollywood aspect ratio was amazing.

Edit: They told me about this …thing and uploaded it for me, pasting links, hope this works. We pass around videos like this all the time and have a right good laugh about it so ignore the count. That was us before this post went live. He is Halal Tufano now.

You could probably edit some hideously gory Halal thing between these clips but I’ll spare you,

Shills, shills everywhere.

They also recently sent me this. If it looks like something Hollywood would produce, that’s because it is.