They never ask why (mixed babies, unnatural). Surely, if you cared about reducing it, medically you’d need to know why? They already know why. Do you think they don’t collect this data? Why no stories from mixed or Asian women? You’d see the white guy cuck husband theme in the photos.
“The findings show a slight drop in the maternal mortality rate for black women, but remained the same for mixed ethnicity women and Asian women, which was two times higher and almost twice as high, respectively.
The report published by MBRRACE-UK (Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk through Audits and Confidential Enquiries across the UK) has deepened calls for action to tackle longstanding inequalities.”
Black women have wider hips but higher obesity rates. They’re also more likely to give birth as teens, when death rates are much higher since the body isn’t finished developing. It isn’t rocket science.
Heart disease, epilepsy and stroke were the leading cause of maternal death during or up to six weeks after the end of pregnancy. Sepsis and thrombosis and blood clots are the third and fourth most common causes
Most of those are obesity related. Are white women supposed to knock the snacks out your hands for you?
Sepsis is a hospital problem. Don’t blame us. I’ve nearly died from poor hospital cleaning procedures years ago, I hate them too. White women are susceptible to hospital germs too. Germs are not white supremacist, you fucking midwits.
“We remain deeply concerned that black and brown people’s basic human rights to safety, dignity and equality in pregnancy and childbirth are not being protected, respected or upheld.”
They’re all brown, Amy. There’s no right to equality under MOTHER NATURE. There’s no right to safe childbirth according to MOTHER NATURE. Government cannot over-ride MOTHER NATURE, Amy. It’s EVOLUTION, Amy. Mother Nature (or God’s design operating via this realm) is trying to kill off abominations, Amy.
Run a study and test it, Amy.
This is why the NHS is doomed, absolute zombie corp.
“There’s currently no way to quantify the issue. We can count the deaths but we don’t know how terrible things are.”
IT’S GONE DOWN.
that’s counting? for black women, it went down if this is about equality, you’d want deaths of ALL races to go down? Instead, it’s anti-white.
This is why we need synthetic wombs. So these activists can get a job at Starbucks, where they belong.
There continue to be racial disparities in maternity care, with Black, Asian, and mixed ethnicity women significantly more likely to die than their white counterparts.
Cry harder, we’re also better at IVF, like everything else.
Maternal suicide sadly remained the leading cause of direct deaths that occurred within a year of pregnancy.
How the fuck can you blame whites for that? If they need an asylum you’d complain if we put them in one!
I’ve also covered the mixed race mental problems in other posts, browse the tag.
The report states that 90% of the 566 women who died had multiple problems which included both physical and mental health problems.
Again, not our problem.
119/556 dead were non-white. So most of the women who died were white but the Guardian covered it like a black issue? Get out.
281/556 obese. Put down the cheetos, fatty. This is mostly natural selection in action.
198/556 had mental health problems….. and decided to stay pregnant? Really? Is that our fault too?
216/556 were immigrants, no right to exploit our NHS, good riddance.
Outcomes for women from different racial groups are not equal.
There remains more than a four-fold difference in the mortality rates amongst women from black ethnic backgrounds, a three-fold difference for mixed ethnicity women and almost a two-fold difference in women from Asian ethnic backgrounds compared to white women.
Mixed was THREE FOLD over white women?
The Guardian lied and said double. I WONDER WHY. As such a small group, this is huge.
Regular Asian-only was DOUBLE the white rate despite being a splinter of the population. I’ve seen a trend of invading Asians calling themselves thin but “with a tummy”. A big gut means you’re obese. It’s a liver disease state. You’re obese, you’re just a short-arse too. Still obese. Still fatal. BMI is based on height.
The body fat percentage of Asians is also higher than white women, who have more muscle, meaning they’re obese at smaller dress sizes. This won’t get flagged up unless you accept racial differences. I have covered BMI obesity studies between the races. Maybe look at the bloody obvious differences like that?
EVOLUTION IN ACTION: (YES, THERE’S A GRAPHIC).
What about miscegenating couples only? Oh, they don’t publish that data. You think they don’t collect it? If the result was better, it would be headline news. It’s worse or they’d publish it.
26% of the women who died (in the perinatal period, up to six weeks after the birth) between 2016-18 were born outside of the UK, 36% of whom were not UK citizens. People born in certain countries had a significantly higher risk of death compared to those born in the UK. Table 1 is taken directly from the MBRRACE report which shows the number of deaths from certain countries, those with the highest number of deaths. It is very clear here that the relative risk is higher for those women from specific countries.
Hey you climbed into the oven by coming over to trust the NHS. We wouldn’t. That’s like signing your own death warrant. Socialist systems have socialist results.
I’m guessing lower IQ countries, someone else check.
Bangladesh, China, India, Nigeria, Romania. Yep, retards. Shitting in the street countries and pimping out their kids to foreign pedos still. Watch this pro-Asia cope:
While there has been a decrease (although not statistically significant) in the number of Black and Asian women who have died, there was an increase in the number of deaths of Chinese/other and Mixed Race people as shown in figure 3. We are still a long way off from seeing an actual reduction in mortality rates. Changes in conversation are not enough, action needs to be taken.
There are no suggestions or comments in the report to work towards this change. It is only discussed that reports are being commissioned, meanwhile racial disparities in maternity care continue..
SOMEBODY NEEDS TO STOP THEM. Well, we want to. You won’t let us.
Almost like these changes are racial differences, eh? The Guardian didn’t mention Chinese/Other women nor mixed women, did they? What a cover-up. No changing Mother Nature.
Asians have the broadest jaws, then Africans and finally Europeans. Feminine is code for whiteness, as a cluster of traits. This also explains stuff that looks weird like skin bleaching and eyelid surgery, they’re imitating those youthful features, as opposed to mature-looking tilted narrow slitted eyes and a square mannish jaw. They want to be trusted by white simps. They’re so hostile to white women in general because of what we have naturally (with scant exceptions that tend to have bug eyes) while they’re plastic surgery fiends to marry off their daughters. When surgery isn’t an option they use make-up, usually contouring or surgical tape.
to be honest, Meghan and some others do it too but that’s more common to mixes trying to look whiter than fully African women, who tend to appreciate their features more however, it’s mostly a mannish Asian thing, to attract white beta providers like that woman in the Economist said (white fever is actually just searching for a beta simp type for them, she makes all the major decisions but makes him think it was his idea, they like dumb ones) this way they can say they haven’t had anything done surgically and be technically truthful look at her medical file before marrying a lawyercunt type it’s a personality disorder and it always comes out like jekyll and hyde eventually anyone who wants to change the basic structure of the face is mendacious then we’re all meant to act shocked when the kids (especially daughters) are fugly, like did you SEE Mel in Melbourne’s daughter? Solid 1. I swear to Christ. One of the ugliest women I’ve ever seen, and she’s mixed with Irish, who are usually stunning. It’s tragic. Making ugly kids should be illegal. Leave them out in the forest. Why do you think women used to do that? Fug. Ugly kids get less parental attention, subconsciously hoping they die off.
This explains their weird gatekeeping of white women from make-up, even European 20th century make-up, since they presume white women already have the advantages they pay a lot for. No wonder they’re pissed but stay mad.
“As we can see from the above according to the UK Health Security Agency report, 32.4 million people have had a single dose, 29.7 million people have had a second dose, and 15 million people have had a third dose as of December 12th 2021. This means there are 23.5 million people who have refused to partake in the largest real-world experiment ever conducted, not just 5 million that has been claimed for months.”
As Vox calculates, that’s 42% of the population, hopefully younger, whiter and more Christian and nubile.
My detractors: WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE?
LOOKS PRETTY WHITE CHRISTMAS TO ME.
I said a while back if I were Q, not that I am, but if I were, then I’d do a lot of this stuff over the Christmas period. For strategic, safety reasons. White people mostly inside, unlikely to fall for riot bait. They already bought in a lot of food for the winter. Fat n happy. Not watching much TV. Shops largely shut up. Tourist areas empty. It’s ideal, really. I failed to specify a year for this Christmas period. Don’t go to outdoor gatherings for Crimbo this year. There will be blood and I’d rather it be Marxist.
As I’ve been saying and Vox is too:
“In other words, the pureblood percentage of the UK population is 42 percent, not 8.9 percent. The same is almost certainly true in every other Western country where the vaccines are being relentlessly pushed, such as the USA. Which, of course, is why they are doubling down on the media and corporate pressure to get vaccinated, which wouldn’t make any sense if herd immunity percentages had already been reached.”
So either he reads me or thinks like me.
“The linked article doesn’t quite reach the correct conclusions, however. Counting second and third shots as first shots means that a) the number of vaccinated people are overestimated, but b) the number of completely unvaccinated people is underestimated.”
I have also pointed this out, for oh, a year or so. The lies are on both sides, you cannot trust any of their uptake data. It’s propaganda, it’s pushing you to do something.
He’s also commenting on the China-Russia financial merge alt to SWIFT that I remarked on back in 2014 or so…. https://voxday.net/2021/12/19/cipsspfs/ I believe my link was a businessinsider post. It was the best part of a decade ago, you go find it. Read through my catalogue Vox, you might understand the economy better. I’ve tagged everything. I also talked about overleveraged Silicon Valley, that’s ripe for mockery.
TLDR: Yes but also no. Yes for their actions and endorsements, not for being male. It’s more resentment than hatred. Like the hippy slutty Boomers. 7,000 words.
This is going to answer some questions I believe merit being taken seriously because it ties into biology and our future.
It is brutally honest and true, whatever any woman tells you. I have no reason to lie, remember.
I think even the MGTOW types would largely agree with this assessment because it’s rooted in Darwin. Men have all the power, women are mostly sitting there. Waiting for them.
Are the men of today equal to the WW2 generation? Yes or no? In terms of genetic fitness, we all know the answer is no. No, they are not. And women definitely resent this. All the ‘vintage’ trends aren’t just longing for the ability to wear twirly dresses and high heels without falling afoul of a rapist immigrant, they subconsciously want the genetic fitness of men back. (although women are dressing androgynous to avoid attack by immigrants too, but men refuse to admit this, instead pretending they all wanted to look asexual simultaneously by fluke) Naturally, none of them will dare tell you this. Especially the tradgirls, so-called conservathots. Do they seem happy to you? Does a bitterness creep in, much like the sad MGTOWs? They believe they’ve made a compromise out of the measly postmodern pickings. Their husband would not be their first choice, if they could get a WW2 hero type instead. All women know this and that is why modern housewives are mocked for ‘settling’. Settling for inferior quality men, not to settle down. In surveys, such women want to get married, so it’s a quality thing. Women are the gatekeepers of genetic quality in the land, men are the protectors of the land itself, remember that. Men are in denial about the sexual selection at play amongst women. All women value men for is genetic fitness. Nobody cares about bank balance if you’re so old (paternal age) you make an autistic kid. Genetic fitness uber alles. It is the reason for both to live. It is the reason for sexual reproduction. A combination of genetic fitness. So women are effectively in an arms race to claim the best man as their provider. Sperm donor means nothing or the ghetto would be doing great.
Compare current ‘men’ to those in the 1990s, then the hippies of the 1970s, the halcyon 1950s, then the WW2 tough 1940s etc. It gets worse and worse the longer you look. Do you imagine women don’t notice? I don’t think it’s that women hate men, per se, I think sexual selection is at play and women hate what men have become. That is the fault of men and something to place fairly at their feet. The obesity rate is much discussed but most obese people are men. They have no pregnancy excuse, no Pill, no menopause. They even tried to meme it in a fat acceptance way as Dad Bod. WTF. They’re lazy slobs who love beer and wings more than their wife. Don’t be shocked when she no longer wants to fuck you, dude. If you look like a 10 month pregnant woman, she’d have to be a secret lesbian. Do you imagine women don’t comment on these developments? Women always handle men with kid gloves because a certain proportion are insane and will snap and kill people if spoken to like fellow adults, on any topic that threatens their Hollywood-built ego (masculinity is fragile, in this era, not others). When in the bathroom, complete strangers of women will just rip into other women’s husbands, including whether he looks weak (like the weeb with a waifu that has a stronger manjaw than him, and trails along behind her like a dog) or whether he got fat (liver disease, fatty liver) and predicting how long the marriage will last while her libido is trying to make it work. Women naturally have a larger body fat percentage to be healthy (T&A) so this stigma only really goes one way, especially since men cannot get pregnant. This and many other factors, women are brutal in judging. Add in cultural alcoholism giving them impotence issues (PC term ED) and how overweight men have dick shrinkage (look it up) and higher oestrogen, and there’s much to discuss behind their back because they’re not man enough to acknowledge it themselves.
It’s like how all the ugly men rally around to call one another 7s because they have a job. That isn’t how numbers work. You’re all like 2-3s to even ask that shit, brutally. We need a hot or not for men on the 10-scale, looks-only, no hiding behind income, since they would be SHOCKED. It isn’t that women are harsh in rating men. Women are realistic. Women evolved to be, sexual selection is the women’s duty. Men are answering from sexual desperation with a slutty attiude and rank women too highly, sorry. Female simps exist (called pick-mes) but they’re far rarer than men.
So we have an embittered manchild demographic who thinks they belong on a GQ cover because they aren’t as fat as their slob friends and can tie their shoes (but don’t you draft them!), with perverse tastes refined by hardcore POV fetish porn and an ego constructed by the finest of Hollywood’s Jewish minds. So far, so repulsive. Women are sure missing out on that partay.
Then consider what separates a boy from a man. It isn’t age. It isn’t whether he ‘fucks’ (nb. violent bravado terms for anything sexual are a tell of a low quality male, who is also very, very, very bad in bed*). Hollywood lies to men and tells them women want “players” (and players share this as urban legend, despite dying alone). Women do not. In studies, women want conscientious** men for ‘long-term mate selection’, who don’t have diseases and retain the ability to pair bond. Yes, what women want in husbands, men wants in wives. Imagine that. Almost like they’re made for each other. Women swoon over Mr Darcy, they ogle James Bond***. Women would not wish to marry James Bond. Look but don’t touch. He looks diseased and …sticky. Who wants to marry a thot?
*to speak like an edgelord 13yo past the age of like, 15. **emotional intelligence, which correlates to IQ so is very much real ***Women sexually objectify men casually more than non-pathological men sexually objectify women, they don’t just tell them about it (verbal abuse) or act any differently (groping etc). They are just looking. This is why women love to read romances and watch entire plot lines about who is getting married. They imagine the couples. It’s the visualisation, they don’t actually want it.
Thus far? As women judging Western men? (also note how female weebs describe Asian men, reconcile with above)
So we have hypocritical sluts claiming their ‘body count’ (violent term) doesn’t count (???) while they brag about defiling the potential wives of other men or hardcore porn addict wankers – so far, so repulsive. Where is the defending Western values part? Even Christian men are whores nowadays, don’t @ me. Having a girlfriend is living in sin. Women don’t look at what you say because men are the liars of the sex*, women look at actions e.g. marriage plots in a story, not proposals.
*most liars are psychopaths and most psychopaths are men, it’s science
What distinguishes men from mere males is moral authority. To put it bluntly, modern men have zero of it. Not little, but zero.
Look at the average partner count for men (higher than women, most sluts are men, just with a smaller group of women), look at the race-mixing data (higher in white men than women, by far) and look at the deadbeating (almost always a man abandoning his kids, not the mother). This is maths. It is incontrovertible.Women have higher sexual disgust, when studied, than men. By a very, very long shot. As in, practically speaking, women would be happy to die alone than waste their time and risk their life investing in the genetic line of a perverse degenerate aka a man they cannot (biologically) respect. Run studies specifically, you’ll see. Would they rather die alone or have kids with a man who had 5, 50, 500 sexual partners? Second study, a man who is a ‘sex tourist’ in countries with child age of consent? How do you imagine women would assess it?
The manosphere is not redpill, they are bluepill. They twist statistics to avoid responsibility on themselves. Single mothers didn’t get themselves pregnant, lads. The manosphere is so bluepill they agree with the white genocide, they agree with the immvasion and the race-mixing. They are civnats at best who believe (like postmodernists they are) that culture is a magical spell over the magic dirt of Da West and NOT the exclusive entitled homelands of white people, and when you add in lazy shit to the village well, it’s still fine to drink from! Because they got their Chinese restaurants, herpes-spreading massage parlours and slightly cheaper nanny for their abandoned baby. Magical thinking morons. That is not a Christian society any more (if it ever was). If stripper or hooker is a possible career path in your culture for your teen daughter, it is not Christian, but Satanic. This reaction to Puritanism in America is like a pendulum swing in the process of going back and cancel culture is the transition period. Cancel culture is anti-degenerate but concealed. Soon, it will be openly. Sure, women are so jealous (/sarc) of the tragedy of the commons playing out: morally, demographically, culturally and in terms of disease. Y’all sound like Boomers who moved to Thailand to be open pedos. Multiculturalism is the enemy, not Pleasure fucking Island. If you wanna go on holiday, go. Don’t IMPORT it. If you wanna live with it, move THERE, do not force your fellows and the future of your homeland to suffer your dirty hippy xenophilia. Women see men become asses and who wants to marry an ass or a class clown? Even their married men claiming to be traditional are not putting their friends aside for their families. Marriage is a commitment.Forsaking ALL OTHERS. The biggest problem with America is this homosociality, you replaced the nuclear family for it. You are not homo married to your buddies. So that’s another arrow in the quiver of why women all secretly ‘hate’ men (but not all men) and won’t ever tell them. We have men bitter on forums at 7pm that there’s no wifey making dinner for them when they get back from work, when they’re actually seeking out the company of men online instead, for spousal emotional support. That’s faggoty. Friends are not a replacement spouse, they’re like wine uncles nagging about the Boomer ball and chain anti-nuclear family rhetoric so WTF. Who wants to marry that? It’s a support group of losers, most of the time. Shouldn’t you be with your family? Why are you here writing the same ‘articles’ for decades, blaming women for male failures in gender role instead of teaching your sons not to cuck? Btw blogger is not a job. This shit is not work. You shouldn’t get paid for this. It’s an online diary. The manosphere is functioning as a homosocial cult (excluding women to profiteer from its members, financially exploitative) so naturally women are avoiding them. They don’t functionally want a woman, they want other men. Let that sink in. That’s why Youtube hasn’t removed all sorts of angry anti-white (women) males from the platform. It’s a trap. A demographic trap. A Pied Piper of anti-white men propaganda, anti-white nuclear family, anti-patriotic and pro-foreign, convincing them to castrate themselves (cutely called the snip or in behaviour, becoming child-free meninists by choice*) before the Muslims do it. Yes, let’s sign up to breed with any male dumb enough to fall for castrating himself! Ladies, don’t crowd them! Form an orderly line!
*because nothing is more attractive than a person of EITHER sex bragging about their mental problems and sterility (which is usually actually caused by STDs, so it might be a cover story)
Seriously, as testosterone levels drop thanks to porn ejaculations (yes, production is finite in sperm too) and other bad habits, why would women want them? Do you want manjaw and fat high-T athlete shouldered women? So why are you entitled to be desired by women, despite being more woman-like yourself, including the endless nagging? Women are not responsible for the West, men are. Their gender role is moral authority in a marriage. A man invented the Pill. A male college professor in America was involved in the court case to give it to an unmarried couple. The politicians who wrote the Immigration Act were men. Yet all the manosphere does is nag women, for problems caused by men.
Rape gangs? Men. Crime rates? Men. Murder and terrorism? Men. Nobody getting married and breeding? Men propose — or don’t. Weak laws? Most judges and police are men. Stupid hiring practices? The board is run by men. Dodgy curriculum? Who funds and runs Marxist charities informing said teachers? Even a man founded Femen. Women see this, even if you play ignorant. Men play dumb all the time to their own responsibility, their own contribution to the Fall, the hypoagency is obscene, let alone the gaslighting about it and chickens are finally coming home to roost in a way you can no longer ignore. The manosphere is a broken record and women have long since tuned out. They never want to man up. They have retarded gender development, they have never mentally grown up and it shows. There are men who are like 40-50, grandfather age, still pondering if they’re ‘ready’ to become dad to an autist. They dawdle like women. They wouldn’t even fight off an invading force to save their own lives, so if that’s a man, we deserve whatever we get from China (who is funding the Marxist universities, btw, not da white wimmin). Personally, I hope for meteor strike.
What is the function of men? Protector. Of his kin. Of his sired family later.
No woman can nor should try to bail men out of their gender role. You won’t give birth for us so it’s actually equal. Any man complaining women have it easy? Sign up to have a womb transplanted and give birth. No? Thought not. Suck it up, buttercup. This is the world of your making. The Mary Whitehouse types warned you this would happen. You still mock them as jealous of you. They were Cassandra. They were correct. Nobody is jealous of degeneracy. It’s an option for everyone. Young people are rejecting it. Biology is real. Government can only coddle so long. The dam threatens to break still. Hot potato is a game only Boomers are old enough to play.
What does this male gender role mean, in practical terms? Demographic protection. Now, an awareness of this is present in all women. All of them. Subconsciously, women respond to the facts of white minority (there are studies about a perception of threat) and strangely dressed foreigners far more than men do. Why? Women rely on men to protect them, whether it’s 999 or whatever. The men expect another man to defend THEIR family and this extends nationally and racially. They feel no investment patriotically because the police protect them, cowards, from personal threat – temporarily.
In hindsight, replacing mob justice between families with the police was a mistake. It made men soft.
Immigrant ‘gangs’ are the new ‘police’ brewing, them genociding us. Currently they only pick off the occasional man, so cuck men let it slide. Without police protection, it’d be open season on whites and they’d suddenly care, long after women and children were targeted.
The modern man (or postmodern man) is not a man at all. He is a eunuch. So many wars were fought by his forefathers, so much blood was spilled, over thousands of years, so he could happily import invaders as ‘immigrants’ (PC term) to fill his factories (class traitor) and his bed (race traitor). You aren’t an alpha if your kids look adopted, you were genetically cucked. White genes are recessive. They are less than 50% yours, I had the term on another post ages ago, ask pol. But these are facts. If you cannot get one (1) hot woman to breed with you from your own group, that is not alpha. It’s omega. Omegas will lower their standards as much as necessary (rejected by the in-group, not all groups*) and women definitely perceive this (note the white women race mixing stats). The rest is high on copium. Look at the divorce rates of such males if you don’t believe me. Again, facts. Like their mongrel’s mental illness rates. From pol/:
*so any white woman could mix, it’s always an option, the omega option
They permit immigration, which is biologically invasion so mentally women think of them as cowards. They permit terrorism attacking their sons and rape gangs attacking their daughters, so where’s the main gender role of men? Even the police and army aren’t what they once were. Men have no function any longer. They have replaced themselves. They have cucked themselves for globalism. For the Beige People NWO OWG dream of Open Borders, whether it’s encoded in law or not. Practically, it’s the same Hippy Wet Dream. Men have abandoned their post and obviously, women hate them for this. The low trust society they chose, from fear. Continuous fear. They never correct it, many go along hoping to be killed by the invaders last. They would rather die out than be called insults by their enemies. Imagine if any of their ancestors packed up because their enemies were trying to psych them out. The species would’ve died long ago.
Men are the rarest thing now. Even so-called chad types (sluts aren’t the same as desirable mates but k) aren’t reproducing, which is ultimately what women want from men, so from a biological perspective it’s no wonder the birth rate is down because neither party is getting their needs met, men for emotional companionship (distracted by hook-ups) and women for protection and loyalty. Also, do men even like women any more or just want a wet hole? Hook-ups are inhumane, they treat other human beings like a sex toy, like a piece of plastic. There’s nothing to envy. It’s pathetic. Mainly they are just masturbating into these women for the approval of other weak-ego men (homosocial motives). Approval-seeking is weak. Men are supposed to validate themselves and the manosphere denies them this to sell them shitty books and ‘courses’. The slutty men are incapable of making love, whatever their claims, so goes through an endless parade of pussy (called girlfriends) because they cannot satisfy a single one of them with lovemaking, which is newsflash the only thing women want, physically. Have you met a sane woman who wanted to be fucked? Who made them that way? Damage goes both ways, and the book Hooked goes into the brain damage both sexes have from sleeping around (masturbating with other people like a psychopath would). Culture is now psychopathic, so why would women respect men? It’s a culture that hates everything women love – the nuclear family, pair bonding and commitment to one’s family. Psychopaths are statistically most sluts, psychopaths are nomads who never commit and are fond of novelty like xenophilia and they deadbeat their family, if they have one. Low IQ men (misogyny is a trait of them, as previously covered)* have been permitted by morally weak smart ones to set the standard for the mores of the West. How many college educated men used it like a free brothel, instead of finding a good wife? Why did we abolish breach of promise for cads? Society is shit because men made it like this. Women only follow where men morally or immorally lead. When has a woman ever started a moral trend? In all human history? Men establish the sexual mores, women just enforce them. There is nothing to enforce now. Look in the mirror for someone to blame, you all became the 30yo Boomer meme. You wanted a global brothel, you got it. You don’t get to fuck around like a witless farm animal then act all entitled like where da virgins at? You are neither entitled to respeK. Nor to ‘trade up’ – to which crop of pristine women? It’s the r-type dream of an untouched meadow for them to corrupt and destroy like sexual squatters. Where they exist they hide from the likes of you, you beasts who walk on two feet, claiming to be men. Rutting sluts deserve rutting sluts. R-types with r-types. K-types with K-types, you can’t change it because it’s how your brain developed. There’s a cap and you cannot go back. Virgins want other virgins, ask them and reee. Their heads explode when virgins tell them they’re disgusting. They are entitled to their own kind, with zero hypocrisy, not the slobbering gross old men who caught diseases in other countries, out-breeding. Hollywood lied to you. Again, Darcy was a virgin. (So was Jesus). Do women prefer him or the degenerate cad Mr Wickham? Which one do modern women prefer too? History will remember many modern white men as spiteful race-mixing sluts, who felt entitled to a pure, patriotic woman they never earned, after wasting decades on the Club Scene. Tragedy of the commons played out sexually. The statistics will also show this. The monomyth is about earning a woman. It isn’t about slaying a dragon, it’s overcoming your own temptation to lust. Choosing her over other women by y/our personal actions (no Muh Dick excuses). Anyone can pick a favourite dish after gorging on the whole buffet table! That’s a deadly sin. Actions speak louder than words. So many claim to be traditional but we women judge by sexual history, it cannot lie. We judge other women and also men. You risk death for the hand of the fair maiden because the wages of sin is death. Boomer Peterson won’t tell you this. It’s truth.
*they resent women because women reject them for low genetic fitness. See top of this post.
Hardcore HD pornography has ruined the West and pair bonding. It goes both ways. Both men and women are lesser quality. It’s just that women have the choice, to invest in the genetics of men or not. And they are logically concluding not. Why breed with the weak? Why waste resources in a low trust, survival society, on cowards? They’d abandon their children, plenty already have (deadbeating) and other men have refused to hold them criminally accountable. Indeed, they blame helpless women and chldren for BEING abandoned, in the ultimate of anti-white victim blaming. It’s like saying why was your 11yo daughter wearing a mini-skirt in London around the Muslim immigrant? Crime is the fault of criminals, this is the First World and we used to have standards. Like don’t cuck for criminals. Anyone who makes excuses for rapists (a crime women consider worse than murder) is worse than serial killer simps. At least those guys are in prison. Meanwhile the manosphere accuses even virgins (child or adult) of making up a false rape accusation, which IS a spin, knowing it’s logically impossible to prove a negative re consent. AKA they hate you. They hate the West. They endorse rape. They write entire articles about rape like pedo-enablers talking about age of consent. They try to nudge the line and talk about ‘what’s rape, really?’ Like ‘what’s a minor, really?’ It’s the same Marxist moral relativism. You wonder why so many are single, or perma-divorced? Women do not tolerate bullshit. We didn’t have these problems in an all-white (non-genocidal) safe society. The EU has admitted to this replacement agenda on their own website in the past, Hillary Clinton gleefully used the term ‘white genocide’ on TV and the manosphere still, oddly, refuses to address the Genocide Question in all but broadest brushstrokes. No actions for correction suggested. Yet more years of navel-gazing. Controlled opps.The pig pen of bitter men. However, women are passive, so the men are stupidly taking ages to figure it out. Women resent men for multiculturalism. Historically, what happens after victory in every war? A BABY BOOM. Controlled by the women. You cannot expect war victory spoils when you refuse to fight the war. And invasion means war. Check the definition. It doesn’t need weapons. We’ve been at war since the first boats from Africa coming to London in the 40s (Windrush) and in America, moreso since the Immigration Act in the 60s that basically permitted long-term constant demographic invasion ever since. You cannot expect a white society, from an increasingly non-white demographic. You cannot expect the comforts of a high trust society, from a low-trust multiculturalism. If the great Roman Empire can be felled by immvasion, none of the West is exempt. Where is your Coliseum? The McMansions won’t last a single century. It took Rome longer than that to decline. So “men” cry out for general, societal respect and the women ask, why? Because respect is earned. It’s based on gender role. Something you do. Men refuse to defend their country, and indeed, side with the enemies to the sons and daughters, then, much like the Marxist Boomers, wonder why they are despised by their own kin. This has been World Civil War, for decades now. We fought two world wars so we wouldn’t have entire boats of foreigners invading. Immigration IS invasion and invasion is immigration. This is becoming blatant as the NWO types import invaders despite supposed health risks. It’s a lie, it always was. This isn’t for your safety or economy. It’s to destroy you. Men pretend to be asleep, it’s easier. This has higher stakes than pretending you can’t use the washing machine. If they had the will, mass deportations would largely fix this. It could be done in a year or two. If they refuse to leave peacefully, which they know they will (even if you cut off welfare, which is cucking for foreign families), then the war would go hot and men… do not care. They’d allow their baby cousin to get bent over by invaders if they could keep the fetish porn and video games.
Women know this. Women hate them for it. Why do you think Marxist women infantilise immigrants? They KNOW. They know it’s a war and conscious cucking may spare them, it eases cognitive dissonance as crimes rise. Because passivity is a trait of women and gamma men. The rise in gamma men, not culled by a hot war, is the primary problem. Subconsciously, those lefty women know the men are threats, they know the immigrant family down the road is stealing their national resources and intending to replace them by reproduction (a form of UN genocide). They know. But what can the women do about it? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. It is NOT the female gender role. Powerlessness causes mental suppression. Did they speak of a rape culture pre-immvasion? Feminists blame weak white men for the actions of immigrants they permitted to invade. They’re right about that. The rest is window dressing. So you get soyboys online complaining, why don’t women care about politics? It isn’t politics you milquetoast little shits, it’s basic demographics. Why have 2.2 kids in an area of 222 Chinese? When your taxes are funding all the latter? Check foreign aid, then come back. Women hate race-mixing, especially white women, and they despise the idea of their children doing it the most. In a low trust society, women shut their legs to reproduction.
THE OVARIES ARE CLOSED. CLOSED FOR BUSINESS.
Rather than mix, or force their kids to.
Women are waiting for men to man up and holding the race ransom or everyone dies out. It’s very simple. It’s a strike. It isn’t safe to have kids so they won’t. Women are not obliged, even in the Bible, to get married and have a family. That’s the somewhat secular Darwinian imperative. Jesus had no children. The baby cult is rekt.
ALL the evidence points to this hypothesis and NONE against in the entire world (nor historical examples like Rome).
They won’t tell you, men need to figure it out for themselves. It’s a FITNESS TEST.
We know this from the oxytocin and patriotism link. Happy women are more patriotic (so we know for a fact male xenophiles are depressed, whatever they claim, mixing is a mantrum, it’s sexual acting-out, it’s immature). Well, much like men refusing to sign up for a military that’s pozzed, why would women risk THEIR life in childbirth to bear the weaklings of cowards?
The planners know this. The Soros types. They know. If you make the men weak, the women DO NOT MATTER. But I’m sure the gammas love to blame them. Isn’t it weird they, like trannies, mentally identify with women more than other men? Isn’t that perverse? Kinda deviant? Why not blame other men? Boris is right there. Trying to sign us back into the EU in all but name as a ‘green’ (anti-white, pro-China) trade agreement (EEC was).
In the late stages of Roman decline, do you imagine the wives respected their husbands? You know, the men they were forced to marry or starve? Rome fucked itself by outbreeding with its slaves, with weak genes. Do not breed with those of low genetic fitness, it’s the hard rule of Mother Nature. If you fuck around, she will fuck you up. Women sensed a culling was in order and have refused, en masse, not to have children. Because babies get you killed in a hot war. We’ve had a cold war of immvasion across the West for decades, how much longer can it last? They say civil unrest, they say community conflict and other polite terms. From a woman’s perspective, what does that look like? It isn’t safe to settle here. Women are only wandering because men are wavering. It’s a game of chicken but either way, women win. Either men clean house and reclaim the West (purging all degeneracy, however much they like it) and everyone wholesome is happy or like Delilah the women ensure the killing blow of genetic weakness ending, in a mercy killing, so subsequent generations of white people don’t need to suffer being the trafficked slaves of the invaders (paging Rotherham, already happening) because their quisling dads were Judas tier scum and left the door open. More women want the death penalty than men – for whom?
Why does the treason continue?
Because the men have some grandiose group delusions, a different form of cultish NPC. Sure, multiculturalism will magically fix itself! MAGICALLY. And immigrants are your friends.
They’ve all adopted the selfish Boomer attitude of ‘screw you all, I got mine’. Do you imagine the immigrants will permit you any porn or any video games? Do you imagine they’ll let you even look at ‘their’ women without putting your eyes out? There is no Magic Dirt. THIS GOES BOTH WAYS. Immigrants can’t become white by colonising white countries. And the white homelands cannot remain culturally civilized and high trust while introducing people from low IQ countries (even if the immigrants themselves are white, see Italian slums about a century ago). Unlike the Boomers, they won’t get away with their ill-gotten gains. In Revelations, it’s noted the sinners tried to hide from God. Why? Tower of Babel. An entire lesson in the evil and anti-Christ nature of multiculturalism. Why do they beg to be hidden? They likely played the r-type game ‘let’s you and him fight’, which is all treason really is. It’s getting the out-group to fight your battles for you. Punching down at white women, after all the immigrant rape, and excusing it, enabling it, is about as low as it gets. Do you expect women to have sympathy for this?
Women are letting the ship go down but you lot blew the holes in the side of the boat. Cause and effect chain of events. If the captain won’t do his job, what do you expect us to do? Literally what, mate.
What good are men if they don’t protect their women? To paraphrase Putin. Is that a man? Do those genes deserve to continue? Call it FGTOW if you like. Either way, the ovaries are closed. All women can do is react to the moral choices of men. The choices are immoral and ongoing so we have slim pickings in terms of options. Women endorse men with reproduction, not fucking. Rutting is for the beasts. Hollywood lies. So what does this say about women’s endorsement of the current crop of men?
The birth rate (and successful marriage rate, which causes wedded births) is a function of homogeneity in a society. Deal with it. As you increase multiculturalism, women feel more stressed in low trust society and the cortisol makes them fat, manly, angry and unwilling to have kids. The genetic, biological cascade is CAUSED by the environment. This is basic Darwin. We adapt to our environment, for survival or thriving. Now women are in survival mode, did you expect it to be pretty? Thinner? Nicer? More nubile? Women are like other animals with the intuition, sensing impending danger. The nesting instinct is a prepper response. Men are playing Chicken Little while enabling their own genetic destruction. They won’t be left to sit happily in the corner once outnumbered by invaders. They are evolutionally, fatally stupid. Women cannot save them, we are not your mother and you’re no longer a little boy. The invaders (immigrants, whatever term) once they have the numbers, will kill him and take all his stuff. It happened in caves and it’s already happening on the micro in schools with white minorities now. If this is how white men die out, God says they deserve it. You’re supposed to honour thy mother and father, you needn’t like them. There is a duty to protect one’s kin and homelands – from invaders. From the Tower of Babel situation, from the multicultural trading posts of Babylon and the whoredom of Sodom. It’s literally in the book. Solomon was literally said to have a weakness for foreign women that took him AWAY from the Lord. The good Samaritan parable is misunderstood. You do not permit them to stay. Guest right is for a guest, that is temporary. If the guest started stealing things and leeching off them (thou shalt not steal, welfare for the out-group is anti-Christ) then the reaction would’ve been different. Sell your cloak to buy a sword. Against whom? Your kin or invaders who threaten them? Love your neighbour as yourself has direct genetic implications. Thessalonians says if a man shall not work, he should not eat. Yet do men stop welfare to people with another home? Nope. They cuck. For the dual passport holders ready to bail on us, should we ever actually need them, they cuck. They literally fund the families of the genetic out-group and bleat about it to women. In the UK, at least, white women tend to vote Conservative. Men vote Labour, see Clause 4. Men vote for Marxism. Maybe out of stupidity that they care about ‘workers’ or a hatred of hard work (no bootstraps required). Academic Agent should do a voting pattern video (since ww2) but won’t. Men have let down the team. You see so many expats who can’t keep their trap shut and sounds like old hags, shrewish women. You’ll be sorry doom-monger types. This is a psyop. Take the Black Pigeon Speaks type, that love the idea fellow white people are suffering, from bombings, from rapes, from trafficking, the gleeful ‘blackpill’ reporting any other era, any other time period would’ve correctly described as treasonous. Men have bought into multiculturalism. Women still and have always hated one another. Sisterhood is impossible. Brotherhood is temporarily possible for the smart men to replace the dumb ones (or trusting, gullible weak ones) because men are pack hunters and are erroneously viewing the out-group as potential allies, rather than historic, genetic, permanent enemies. If I were in someone’s house at 2am, I’m not there for a kind reason. Same is true at zero hour of a country, poised for a racial pogrom. The dehumanizing stage of white people has already begun. There are no Good Ones, if immigrants hated the West so much they wouldn’t be here. It’s gaslighting and it’s working. The relational aggression between men hasn’t evolved because air transport is so novel. Men have yet to adapt. Women had to function in large groups of hundreds in primal times so relational aggression is protective of our kin. Men do not have this. Men, especially weak ones, will try to get along. Like small fish trailing a bigger one. You see entire forums where they side with their enemies to drag down their own women. Isn’t that sickening? Oh but why oh why won’t the women risk everything for them? …Why? So they can be deadbeated? So the guy can hand her the cricket bat at 2am? So he can stand idly by and forgive the immigrant who raped his 8yo daughter and the ‘immigrant’ siblings who drove the 16yo brother to suicide with hate crime style school bullying? Why oh why don’t white women like them? THAT’S THE IMPORTANT QUESTION HERE. WOMEN ARE SO HUGE ON SOLIPSISM OBVIOUSLY. Statistically, most narcissists are – nevermind. [men, it’s men]
(Blackpill Bingo Game: replace all the actions of immigrants with invader and see which fits better, they even cuck for vikings now, that’s the people who raped virginal nuns if you’ll recall).
Guess we just ‘hate’ men. Not like, foreign men, but just literally all men. That makes sense. Literally every man, regardless of conduct. Regardless of religion. Regardless of moral compass and hypocrisy in deed. Just muh All Men. Can’t see any reasons, can you? No, don’t see anything wrong with their conduct – according to the Marxists. They’re perfect little multicultural cucklings, cheering on their own demographic death. Their quisling anti-white behaviour is impeccable. Indeed, stand and hold open the gates as long as the invaders have an additional hole for you to fuck, while you’re fucking over your country/men financially. Then complain about ‘immigration’, to top off the sheer arrogance of it. (Patriotism is not homoerotic, man on man action, it’s white men liking white women and not foreigners, m/f). Why not, after all? How many immigrants has Nigel Farage imported as concubines? Why would we expect consistency from men? They’re not thinking with their big head. They’re emotional. Brotherhood in the manosphere is just a warmed over Open Borders anyway. They are not real men and women sense this. They fail in the primary gender role of men. Their ultimate purpose for their life. Women have never wanted to open the borders (brainwashed children repeating schoolteachers do not count and anti-fa is mostly male).
So do women hate men? They fear foreigners because if you don’t get raped, your kids will. Or your sons will have to fight a war you refuse to, at some point. Native men? Only the enablers, the xenophiles and the cucks. Those are all the same group, whatever differences they pretend. Some women may be able to lie to themselves consciously (Guardianistas) but the ovaries don’t lie. Learn from history or be a page in it. If the West doesn’t halt the steady stream of sewage, let alone start throwing it out, don’t blame us womenfolk when everything starts to smell like shit. We don’t hate you, per se, we hate that you’re smelling of shit. Just stop smelling of shit. Just get rid of the shit. It isn’t fucking difficult, you evolved for it. No nagging ‘but that isn’t equal, we expect to be compensated’. Living in a high trust civilization with slender nubile wives is the compensation, you morons. It doesn’t just happen. Being respected by your society is the compensation because you earned it, idiots. And nobody gets ‘compensated’ BEFORE doing the work, socialists. You do the work, THEN compensation. The peacock shows the feathers are big and healthy, THEN he gets the peahen tail. In this game of ovarian chicken, you will lose, it’s a question of whether you kill your own kind in doing so. Will white men let their omegas take them all down, out of spite? Why not voting rights ONLY to any white man married to a white woman? No? Why ever not? That’s the only tradition. This would exclude your sterile omega cucks and CCP spies (to pull a ‘Jeremy Hunt’). Women are not obliged to breed with the weak and the treasonous. There is no other viable option to women currently. Do women hate all men? Kinda. We especially hate it when they import wars they’re too cowardly to openly fight. And that’s why everyone hates Boomers, who started the spigot of pure shit. Only to bitch and nag and whine when their grandchildren complain about the stench.
We hate navel-gazers saying women are the problem (really it’s the Asian Question, read the Census and who votes bigger gov) and when they aren’t being openly, spitefully anti-white as your local anti-fa group (they’d fit right in), it’s the futile ‘when’s the war? talk. You’re already in it. They’ve already been turned against Their Women, which is play 1 in the book of war psyops. They refuse to acknowledge this, instead going along with anti-white propaganda, when some of it flatters them. You bitches are not Nikola Tesla, you have accomplished absolutely nothing in the easiest times to be alive ever. You aren’t even drafted, little piggy. Teen boys used to beg to be allowed to serve their country and defend their homeland below proper age. Those teen boys had more honour than you ever will. Successful people don’t insult their forefathers who bravely died for them, they don’t nag about The West (you ARE the West) to suck off the funding foreigners and they don’t degrade their own women (it’s like keying your own car). Wake up and smell the propaganda drop. It smells of invader bullshit. You all lack in masculine character. Blackpill is really just Yellowpill, the Asian supremacy cucking. The NWO plan to replace Western dominance with Eastern. They admit it. Do you imagine such corrupt societies will treat you kindly? They have an excess of men, meaning there’s no use for you. When you find yourself praising the CCP just like CNN, pause to consider whether you might’ve been tricked by anti-white propaganda. Rule one in the war book is to make the enemy hate their own kind and make them hopeless. In WW2 we dropped sexually mocking papers describing how their (enemy) women preferred foreign dick. Turn them against their own culture. It 100% fits. Why do you imagine social media keeps up those twitter accounts? Those Youtube channels? Why doesn’t it take those down? It’s Marxist in method, it’s Marxist in intent and it’s Marxist in result. Use your big brain.
Women will never forgive, let alone respect and breed at historic high-trust numbers with their men, until the safety of that high trust society is restored. That is the undeniable fact of the matter.
The ones who deny the ongoing genocide much like the Red Army rapes when it’s happening to women, boys and girls before their very eyes in highly public court cases is a great reason to hate someone. If not for treason, then for what?
You can’t spell treason without reason.
Mary Whitehouse should be patron saint of 4chan, at this point. She was right before Enoch. Nobody else foresaw drag time story hour or child strippers in gay bars dressed in drag. She did. She walked so Enoch could run. https://www.defendevropa.com/2018/news/enoch-powell-why-they-hate-him/ Politics being downstream of culture. Times are never different, people are still shit. Now men are making the same Marxist ‘mistake’ and being anti-Enochs (for ‘diversity’). There is no blackpill, there is only yellowpill. Cuckpill. Cowardpill. You don’t get to complain about your smell, other people have been able to detect it for a while. J’accuse, Judas.
Have fun being dog dads, you fucking degenerates. [This happened in late Rome too. Ask reddit.]
The saddest part is she really thinks she was ever smart enough to actually earn her place there. Don’t they know diversity quotas are the only reason many of them are accepted? They literally have legal quotas, they’re forced. So employers don’t respect the obvious diversity hire or in cases like mine (just a woman) suspect I might’ve been a quota person (minus merit) until I prove otherwise. I shouldn’t have to but that’s why I disagree with all quotas. If anything it hardens a prejudice. Positive discrimination is still discrimination and people will resent it as such. Meritocracy cannot exist under multiculturalism. White people, especially the working poor, have known this for a while. We have census data. There is rising nepotism, especially in the areas where Asians only hire their own. Which should be illegal. With rising corruption, social mobility becomes almost impossible. The surest predictor of your status in your life is that of your parents, school just lies because they get paid for good grades. So you try hard at school, in my case missing out on your actual life because you believed it so hard (it was a cope but a sincere, desperate one with pure motives), only to overextend for Boomer employers who’ll take credit or outright steal your work. Poor kids use education to get a leg up, whatever that means, rich kids use education to network and meet future employers and their spouse. The latter option is the only one that really works but you need money to network, money the poor naturally don’t have. I had no idea you could even use education as a pivot to network until years later. It seemed so random. Literally nobody tells you. Years, wasted. We should just test everyone’s IQ at like 11-12. Bring back SATs too. It would clear up a lot of confusion and stop giving out false hope to conscientious students. So many ‘gifted’ kids burn out because they were just good students, they weren’t actually smart. I happen to be both so I noticed how some excessively parent-pushed kids just burned out the second the parents pumped the breaks. It was never them, they had no intellectual curiosity innately, let alone originality. Your intellect isn’t just grades, which the Asians get wrong, but also a marker of your mental originality. If you’re not capable of being original, you’re stupid. It’s that simple. The fool also fears being original, because they know it’s a social risk and they rely on the group for survival. High IQ can navigate that, stupid knows it can’t, deep down, so you get naysayers and haters. For being true to yourself. If your only qualification after years of the world’s top class education, is that? The raw material is not what you were told. The qualification isn’t a piece of paper, it’s what they did to YOU. As we say here, you can’t polish a turd. Titles mean nothing and this has always been acknowledged. A king’s nursemaid from childhood begged him to make her son a gentleman. Apparently he said “a gentleman I could never make him, but a Lord?” Bear in mind kings have magic healing powers. And this is still a famous story. So what version of magic dirt is this? Magic diploma? You’re not gonna magically fairy godmother yourself into a white life outcome, by sitting among some old white people stones roughly shaping a building. What kinda Charmed witchcraft shit is that? Education is supposed to enhance the smarts you already have. If you’re talking about the general employment situation, that’s because the EU keeps screwing us in many many ways. We apparently left but haven’t really but I think Boris wants to sign us back into the EU using a trade deal with them, whatever thing he’s currently working on. De facto re-entry.
You are being treated equally. This is the treatment white people get.
I’ve been refused funding year after year after year – for being white. I met other criteria, because my family… is not rich. I worked hard. Too hard. Pointlessly hard. It was my race. In my homeland. So I just gave up. You do, eventually. If they don’t want the talent, go ahead and hire the rich kids, the nepotism inbreds, go ahead. Let the Titanic sink. Atlas has been shrugging for a while now, as alluded in Best Post. Plenty of other high IQ people I know have done the same, because family either couldn’t help or didn’t want to. You look at the institutions that say they want intelligence and grit and they don’t. They want to be PC (anti-white) over anything constructive. Fuck them, we’re out. I’ve told so many people not to even bother applying for uni, because I know being white, they won’t get one tenth of the help they expect…. in their homeland. These people now pay taxes, as did their parents (and mine), so entitled little cunts like this one can feel like she’s owed a free ride. What a bullshit sob story. You chose to be here. Literally none of us would. This is equality. It sucks. Prior to mass immvasion, uni was actually free. That’s what a homogeneous society without the world’s huddled leeches can afford. Knowing this, is injustice.
It’s a gutting revelation but her attitude is insightful. They really think they’re special.
Personally, I’ll only go back to such places for anything when they stop actively promoting our genocide. So probably never. I calculated that my socialist serf taxes (you know, for immigrants like this) deprive me of 1/3 of my working years in another post (so about 15 years) and that would actually be enough time to found and raise a family on so this system is UN definition genocidal. It’s designed to destroy us and to rub salt, fund the Darwinian competition. The national debt is bigger than we’re told, I believe I called it ‘we are absolutely fucked’ because…. we are. It isn’t just people like me. The system is crumbling. GOOD.
Her presence is proof the system is failing, not changing to some Marxist utopia. Marxists assume we’ll always cuck for them and continue to keep the water running and electricity working. LOL NOPE. You want a revolution? Piss off 1. the working class, 2. the servant class, 3. the productive class and 4. the genius class. All at once. Then you’ll see the fireworks as the tower of Sauron slowly falls. It’s been taking years because they were riding on the coat-tails of centuries of white sweat, blood and tears.
Who will the Asian kids copy now? Cry me a river.
Why should we invest in a system that actively hates us, tries to destroy us in illegal ways and tells us we’re evil for even talking back about it? What society? Who is We? Let the Boris types pump the petrol themselves. After all, they went to Eton. They’re fully qualified.
Employers don’t owe you a job. Why would they hire an entitled black girl when they can hire out Pajeet from India who’ll be more grateful, tick the same boxes, and work for less money with zero sexual harassment suit risk? This is the world Cultural Marxism has made, it truly is corporate cancer. Tokens are now being played against one another and the schadenfreude is tremendous. Not so smug now, huh? These immigrants really think they’ll ever belong here and the streets were EVER paved with gold. Then why would we let you work here? Why would any economy need any form of immigration if it were already successful demographically? Free trade is dysgenic bullshit. Global workforce, same. It’s nepotism on an international scale. All the rich kids go to the same schools in bloody Swedish mountains or wherever and everyone else scrabbles over their fiat crumbs. While they rule over everyone, in high positions. Which they NEVER EARNED. This is the economy of globalisation and it is brutally ineffective. At least in monarchy we could cut their head off once they started being really corrupt and the threat of getting their kids too kept them in line. This is literally worse than serfdom, this system. That’s the only reason you’re here, in Europe, in England, and were allowed to go there, when so many natives are pushed out. Could any woman, however talented, study at Eton? No? Because she’s got no Y chromosome. How is that legal, when it violates the Equality Act? They know it’s bullshit. They KNOW. It’s another layer of red tape traps for us to squabble over. If you’re so smart, why can’t you be self-employed? What’s with the victimhood mentality in addition to the conceit? You don’t just point at the paper and get handed a CEO position like the Mythical Millennial of Boomer articles. Enjoy that damn decline.
Do some women choose shit men for husbands? Yes. Blame the father as role model on that one. Are some occasionally tricked by psychopaths, to realise after the wedding? Yes. It happens. Lovebombing can happen. Does the West practise arranged marriage? No.
So why are they acting like women want to be auctioned off like chattle? Courtship has a more reliable endpoint and structure (will end in marriage) compared to Boomer ‘dating’, which is mostly bobbing around and people lying about ‘commitment’ like using a word (GF/BF – not a commitment).
Edit: I keep trying to link this shitfest of an article so it’s in the caption now.
Now, what grain of truth do they exploit?
Well, some husbands are abusive. Financially, sexually, violently, verbally. They’re also likely to deny it and gaslight, including any children. The damage of abuse ripples through entire generations and the Bible speaks against it. Abuse does exist and men are the violent sex in the species, yes. But better then, to teach women how to filter out the men who would protect them from the ones who would hurt them?
They actually help misogynists by lumping them in with the good men.
I’ve mentioned the cottagecore aesthetic before in terms of politics, I won’t mention it again.
If they actually cared, they’d teach women the difference between this guy wants you to stay in the house because you mutually agreed you’d take care of the kids for a few years, to the guy who keeps his wife on a ‘budget’ with her own money so they cannot escape and refuses to let her work part-time, even when the kids don’t need her. That is a huge distinction.
Are there misogynists who just want a sex slave and unpaid manual labourer? Yes, certainly. But with a little instruction from other women, you can sniff them out pronto. Why not educate them on actual conservative values versus these ‘toxic’ ones, they claim are also conservative? Why the false equivalence? Marxism, we all know why. It’s nothing about women. They only aim this at white people and only the Christians. There are tons of Muslim bloggers and nobody breathes a word.
And why wouldn’t men have requirements of their wife? Women are the sexual selection in the species. Women have far more requirements than men, unless the man is mad and delusional. As long as he doesn’t want something totally hypocritical, an alignment of values is assortative mating. There’s statistical evidence for it. As long as he doesn’t feel entitled (narc trait) to a virgin when he is a disease-ridden manwhore, what do you care? They’re consenting adults and it’s their body, their choice. Be equally yoked i.e. if you a thot, you deserve a thot.
The only possible cause for concern is grooming, and I have seen articles from the manosphere openly discussing wife-beating (tell it to the judge), gaslighting (how to convince-type articles), how to mentally torture a virgin into giving it up (torture it is! coercion is illegal) and how they should only predate on women too young to know the depraved sexual stuff they want is NOT normal (misinformed consent is legally rape, whatever forum bros try to claim otherwise*). In general, marriages with an age gap over 10 years divorce more. Duh. Grooming is a huge reason why but instead of making it illegal to groom anyone under 21 (which shouldn’t be a hard sell politically) they instead feel entitled like the Africans who believe they can rape the HIV away (nope). These males also tend to assume they can wipe their sexual slate clear (including divorce risk) with a younger woman, or a virgin of any age. Let’s call it the Boomer assumption. They keep ‘trading up’ and repeatedly divorce. It isn’t the woman, it’s you dude. NO such thing. Most divorce is actually the re-married, trying and failing repeatedly. Ban re-marriage if you’re so ‘trad’. All the hypergamy in marital terms is actually seen in men, statistically. The manosphere are generally projecting personality disorder types, from histrionic sluts (seductive personality) to literal nutcases (psychopaths praising their own trait and feeling no empathy for women – or men, but they don’t mention that).
*even our annulments in this country account for this, certain deceptions are grounds for it, it’s traditional to protect against false light and other deceit because marriage is a financial contract, obviously we need fraud protections!
Honestly, if you’re over 21 and marry a misogynist, it’s your own damn fault. You had the frontal lobe maturity at that point. Unless they were a literal psychopath and fabricated their entire personality before then, you saw red flags and continued like a Commie parade. Same applies to men who marry gold diggers, Ting Tong green card snatchers and the like. You get what you fucking deserve. You should’ve done the fucking legwork. Nobody shotgunned you into marrying them, marriage is not a status (prestige) to get egocentric about (cough Brittany) and become some obnoxiously off-putting… well, skank. It’s a personality type (conceited) in addition to a behaviour. Personally, some people are too lazy to do the legwork and stay single. Fine. There’s no Christian concept of a duty to wed, Jesus himself was single. Married people are not superior to Jesus. And I find the baby cult overtones to be disturbing because looking at the data, breeding as a teen mother (even wedded) is likelier to kill the mother and the child. We shouldn’t be encouraging this and forget that historically, consummation occurred much later, years after the wedding itself. Too many American assumptions can harm people who are trying their best to be traditional. It’s a lifestyle that doesn’t work in part, you have to understand the whole thing.
You cannot be the USA version and expect Ancient Europe results.
America has been given over to the reprobate mind and it shows. How many ‘Christian men’ have fornicated? Get drunk, even after marriage? Go to a strip club for their ‘stag do’? Those are not Christians, hunty. Yet there are pick-mes (female simps) who will agree with anything an available man says, that’s usually the gold digger type. Thottery isn’t just T/A it’s also male attention if they’re mental enough (BPD, ASPD, NPD, codependents especially). Assuming all women want to marry because they’re sane is a mistake.
An Asian comedian described (I think on netflix?) how she viewed being a stay at home mother as a sponsorship. Naturally, once the kids part of the equation is socially achieved, they have no use for the sperm donor any longer and that’s why divorce rates are higher. But this concept is insightful. Some gold diggers do just want to open their legs twice (once to conceive, once to birth) and then live off a man for 18 years. So men do need to fear misandrists in addition, this cake cuts both ways. So men assuming women are sincere is also really, really stupid. Obviously don’t rape a girl who claims to be a virgin just to prove a point (although I’ve seen manosphere men say to ‘push’ for sex in that situation anyway, which is EVIL) but just bear in mind there are frauds for anything worthwhile. Fake Ks exist, for men and women.
If they really thought these women were dumb, do an IQ study compared to single mothers or working mothers or cohabiting mothers. Also ask how many books they could read from home versus working. Ah, but they won’t check! Obviously some men are tyrants as husbands and I’m not denying it can happen but we already have laws. If you taught about them at school they’d know.
And what if men want to raise the children from home? It can happen. Why not celebrate that? Oh, it’s actually about demographics and ‘whiteness’. Do you mean national success?
I’ve spoken to enough old people to know things were NOT better back in the day. Women did actually work, this was normal and they enjoyed it. They rarely did anything taxable. For one thing, that happiness study touted from America is self-report crap. There’s something called positivity bias that accounts for it. Meanwhile, instead of divorcing people killed themselves. Instead of reporting an abuser, the kids would eventually also get abused. It was not roses without thorns, that’s impossible. Instead of mentioning this, it’s a wholesale dismissal. That won’t work. I wanted to post studies here because nobody had the same… slant. I wanted the truth, I don’t care who looks bad. I don’t care as long as it works. Maybe a lefty idea or two is useful to us (cultural appropriation would keep non-whites out of white culture) and maybe some righty ideas are bullshit e.g. Israel is our greatest ally, trust all your money with the central banks, import immigrants because they’re ‘honest’ and ‘hard working’, civtnattery mostly. To date, I see nobody else doing this. Y’all pick a side. I point out the only sides are true and false. It’s a false choice. It’s like MGTOW or marrying a thot. Er, neither? You can pick a third option. People who deny this are literally selling you something. I never sold a thing here. Not once. Not a penny made. Yet I catch heat for telling the truth, and they attack me instead of my arguments.
Here the author admits the lie:
“It’s also clear, by the way, that these young women are very aware of the men who are part of the incel far-right. You see in the content and the comments that the girls see those kinds of men as misogynist assholes. They’re looking for an authoritarian, hyper-masculine figure who still respects them and their autonomy. It’s a weird kind of cognitive dissonance.”
Women hate Bluebeard? NO!
Say it isn’t so! Almost like women evolved disgust and hatred responses to sexual violence, or any prospect therein!
And all the men calling ‘wife discipline’ a kink can also tell it to the judge. Or a large jury. So everytime a woman cuts off a man’s dick and throws it in a blender because he cheated or thought about abandoning her plus kids, that’s what? Husband discipline? Discipline goes both ways, sweetheart and only men have external genitalia to beat. You’re wide open in terms of vulnerability when it comes to the physical so don’t set a standard you’d hate to meet. However, the stress of beating women (or raping them) can cause infertility (latter from scarring) or even death (from shock of the stress) so that pesky Holy Bible expressly states a man must love his wife as his own flesh i.e. no punching bag defences here. Seriously, did any of them actually read it?
Any man telling you he can beat you because God said so is no Christian.
As for the Gen Z up and comers, welcome. Browse the tags. Search for anything, I’ve posted on most things. Women have and will always hate Bluebeard. It’s that ‘toxic masculinity’ you keep bringing up! To beat your women, who should be under your cloak of protection.
They think misogynist wankers who’d tie them up to fuck them 12 times a day like a Muslim’s pet goat…. are a-holes?
WOW. I am shook.
It’s almost like they’re…. using their brain…. to discriminate… and discern… in a Biblical fashion…. which type of man is a patriarch, versus the type their husband would need to shoot like a coyote for preying on their teenage daughters with emotional abuse about how being a virgin is ‘boring’ and ‘everyone’ has herp.
Also LOL at being treated like a human = cognitive dissonance. Do they think Christians operate like brothels and lock all the women in at the end of the night? But the Left praises those brothels in America! PRAISES! Despite being treated like farm animals.
Really, this is the FGTOW I mentioned. Men don’t get to strike from women, but women get to strike from men. If they can’t get their needs met, why should they bother with men at all? To be treated like an object, a sex toy? This is empowering! Feminists in the traditional mould would’ve celebrated this agency to determine their life path.
Marxists want your tax money and your dead babies.
How can it ‘support toxic men’ when you just admitted they hate those guys?
Tradwomen want a man with similar life goals, not someone who crushes their own because of some bravado facade aping masculinity. If you don’t care about your wife’s ambitions and values separate to you, you have no business marrying her.
Naturally, nothing about ‘brown supremacy’ practiced by said Marxists is mentioned. Apparently it doesn’t exist, there’s no race-mixing propaganda in every advert or a black ‘Bond’.
” a toxic kind of womanhood”
don’t you mean whitehood? the place everyone wants to move to?
“competes for masculine attention” while there are ugly women playing pick-me and agreeing with abuser concepts, especially from MRA/MGTOW groups (or men pretending to be women online doing same) they previously admitted most of the girls hate misogynists. You JUST admitted. Reading comprehension is important.
the right is generally exclusionary to women, they get that part right they ignore people like me when I have literal data for my points only to complain why women don’t take them seriously – we look up the data, not some forum’s mass psychosis opinion with cult of personality leaders
the right is most exclusionary to white women, who have nowhere else to go black women have a pretty strong Sisterhood online, as do other races white women are also derided and hated by non-white women, which is putting them off Marxism (non-whites voted for Big Gov, look it up) in addition, white men say they’re lying (this is gaslighting) about not being sluts… which is basically calling them a whore. Defamation, verbal abuse. Gee, I wonder why THOSE men are hated, and eternally forever alone? Maybe they deserve to be?
Drop them all in a time machine.
Who survives? The bitchy men get killed for being gobby (duel, war, pressganging, whatever) and the women…? Get married? Oh wow, they’re so evil, aren’t they? Gamma males hate women because they envy them. They imagine all women would be gold diggers, if we could. God forbid we have the character they’re lacking, because narcissistic projection doesn’t account for moral difference. They actually believe the forum copes that women have less going on upstairs (then why did they ALL avoid you?) Then there’s womb envy and men claiming they want to produce children alone (you know legally you’d become a single mother with the same statistical outcomes, right? RIGHT?) and utterly refuse to raise their own spawn (that’s still abandonment and still abusive, buying a nanny won’t make your kid less fucked up).
There’s a monoculture among Right men online, they have no common culture, just postmodern multicultural anti-Marxist. They are not nationalistic so they will fail. Hell, they aren’t even racially awake. They think the race-mixers importing immigrants actually want a different demographic from the Marxists! God divided the nations, race and languages. This fake Right won’t last because it cannot, it violates commandments (do not adulterate your blood). Brotherhood is a myth, just like Sisterhood. Multiculturalism is death. The Brotherhood international bullshit is genocidal and largely aimed at whites, so anti-white to boot. We have Asian Muslims living in the West off welfare paid by white Western men writing long screeds telling men the very women who reject them (Asians) are massive sluts who love race-mixing and the white men are gullible enough to believe their historic and genetic enemies. Those are your competition. Darwin says you need to disagree with him or at least question his motives, for being here, if we’re so terrible, for daring to lecture you on your own culture (if a woman can’t teach, why an immigrant?) and thinking we won’t spot their obvious motives. Let’s you and him fight, says the Asian immigrant. White women are seeing through it, thanks to hostile abuse on all sides (more personal than white men get). If they cry out about the anti-white anti-woman abuse, they’re called Marxist by so-called Right wing men. Marxists call them Nazi. So yeah, there is a new group springing up. White men are pretending not to see, despite literal rape gangs proving these women correct, because they’re cowards. Frankly, cowardice genes need to die out.
Men care for demographic numbers, women for quality.
Anti-racist, pro-multicultural Right bloggers are not right. They’re money grubbing. No society has been ruled by them because they presage the end of the cycle of Empires. Their way is death. It’s an oxymoron. Protect your people by making friends with the enemy? It’s social cucking. There are no Nice Ones. They’re nice until they gain numbers and power over you. That’s war you half-wits.
Who was the author? Asian man. Nobody is pointing this out. It’s kinda relevant. Why are they telling us who we are? You’re not one of us. There’s no magic dirt. You don’t belong here.
“Let’s you and her fight” says the anti-white Asian to the trusting, gullible white people. STOP LETTING THIS WORK.
I’m clearly not the only one seeing this. Why is he living here if we suck so much? Deport all the people who say white people suck, to non-white countries. If not, you lie.
Degeneracy has always existed and most of it is currently Asian (look at prostitution rates, HIV etc). Blaming The West for your personal failures in life doesn’t work. I sense a lot of these white guys moaning (nagging) aren’t really right-wing, they’re just losers looking for an excuse. Most of the manosphere is a cope for their situation in life, instead of them. That’s called a cult. It’s a cult of dick, navel-gazing but never moving. If you dropped them into the 1950s, 1850s, 1750s, they’d still suck but also probably die. Quickly. Cannon fodder is their highest life purpose. We all know the low IQ men stats.
Why aren’t women lining up to marry them? Must be the women’s fault?!
I reject wholesale, the notion the manosphere is 1. White (actually Asian, or with Asian loyalty) or 2. right wing or 3. Christian (not a converted slut) or 4. patriotic (anti-foreigner) and/or 5. high IQ. Most guys on those forums lie. They lie about their sex life, they lie about women and they lie about their IQ.
So tell me why women are supposed to desire (despite all stats) race-mixing, sexually promiscuous, entitled, low IQ, out-group loyal, compulsive lying, commitment complainers? How is that the problem of women, instead of personal to those ‘men’? Are men supposed to desire big tatted Marxists too? There’s no sexual AA.
PUSSY WON’T SOLVE YOUR PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS.
You’ll be You, with more responsibilities. If you can’t stand the duty of a postmodern Boomer marriage, how badly would these losers fail utterly in a traditional one where everything is 100% on them? Trad means you can’t blame the woman. It’s all on you.
It’s like men who love the gym but hate the draft. If you love working out, why not get paid?
If you hate the West, be less of a hypocrite and burn your passport. Women see through these games, we have more verbal sections to our brain. This is why the gamma hates women. Verbal games only work on men. Men must coerce and force women, to get the same result. There are NO masculine wiles. Linguistically, you are dumb. Being angry at everything is still emotional and very male. Why tell a moron he’s being irrational? So women are oddly quiet on politics. You can’t fix stupid but it can stalk you. Men have life on Safety Mode.
Mostly the manosphere is a support group for traitorous (anti-patriotic) slutty losers. If you have data (not self-report) to the contrary, publish it. But the moneymakers have products to sell, so must make it seem glamorous. Do they seem happy, and glamorous? Or bitter, and lonely?
Going full woke? wow, they are going to lose so many donations.
According to UK law, charities also aren’t allowed to be political organisations. Campaigning for any political cause means they could be stripped of their charitable ((tax-free)) status.
They won’t commission indigenous people or local artwork, but they’ll go to a whole different continent and celebrate that? Not fit for purpose. Shut it down.
English Heritage has commissioned a series of portraits depicting six historic figures from the African diaspora whose stories have contributed to England’s rich history. Each artist has been supported by our curators and historians to creatively portray their subject, and the paintings will be hung at the English Heritage site connected to its subject.
African colony. They have colonised England, especially London. People did not want them here and still don’t. They have contributed absolutely nothing, ever. Even to their own continent. You didn’t build that, we did. We were down the mines, not you. We were slaves to the Romans, not you. You are leeches who came over largely after two world wars to suck off the new welfare state. You have no reason to be here and we keep voting for you to leave. What do you think the next step is? White people are nice – until we’re not. Tick tock goes the debt clock.
You copied and pasted the pose and just switched the face. We know because that’s a white royal pose. We all know the exact painting you ripped off. They really have no creativity, do they? She even copied most of the white woman’s features, erasing some of the blacker ones. What a damning testament. The bottom of the dress is unfinished and odd-looking because she ran out of things to trace. A race of tracers, apt metaphor. Also why the figure isn’t aligned properly. The tracing paper moved, did it? Should’ve used Photoshop or had a real artist do it for you on fiver.
We wuz Russian Princesses.
The second was a rape baby (slaves don’t consent). “We’ve always been here” – no.
Third enslaved white people “he attempted to subjugate the local tribes there” murderer of the natives, also code for rape. “That area of the world was so multicultural” a colony. It was colonialisation and slavery. You might as well have painted this, in blackface and a toga:
Fourth is white. He’s paler than a Greek. He was also Christian, which is skipped over. Oddly similar to other Saint paintings but that could be a style choice.
Fifth was another military import. Hitler also hired black people, and Muslims, I don’t think that’s a point.
“I didn’t see myself represented in it” because it wasn’t yours. You’re trying to appropriate it.
“black Europeans” oxymoron
Sixth was a ‘servant’. So nobody of any accomplishments? A chamberpot washer? That’s the best you could drag up? He lived in the 1600s but the dumb cunt painted him in later 1700s clothes. It’s supposed to be historical. She couldn’t do it, could she? Details are hard when you’re a diversity hire.
The GCSE tier art is literally the best they could find (with the Saint painting guy having the only talent). I could do better in primary school and I know others who could. That level of ‘talent’ is common which describes my whole attitude to this insult and the army of dislikers they hid.
“Mar, who represents the National Coalition For Men”
there it is, hardly an American name is it?
“and two individual men challenging the law”
let’s see names and faces of the gamma bitches who want women to die for them while they sit high and pretty as Secret Kings
draft those three and only those three
NO more male supremacy propaganda if you’re too weak to even sign up for a draft you claim doesn’t matter.
No more muh Patriarchy bullshit. You are males, not men. Men fight for what they believe in, and not just through a keyboard. You are not a real man by living to age 18.
Women don’t have the upper body strength to serve, end of story. Internal organs are different too, from the spine structure to the lung capacity. Women literally do not have military endurance. They also make great POWs, especially for rape, and if nuked, the infertility means winning the war cannot happen. Since the group is genetically dead. No instinct to protect their women > low T. Cowards like this were the reason we kicked boys out of the tribe at puberty, to let nature finish them off if they were yellow little snakes.
DO YOU WANT GENDER ROLES OR NOT?
NO WAH WAH WAH IT’S HARD. DYING IN BATTLE IS LESS PROBABLE THAN MATERNAL MORTALITY IN AMERICA, WHICH HAS GONE WAY WAY UP.
MRAs are just anti-white female, in the same way SJWs are anti-white male. It’s all anti-white and literally most white people are the women, sorry to tell ya.
Yet more genocidal mewling. Cultural Marxism claims everyone is biologically the same. Christianity doesn’t dispute this biological difference used by evolution/chromosomes, but adds God gave us equal yoking in spiritual value. So it’s anti-Christ, too.
Hillary Clinton wanted to pass this. Should tell you.
Starting to think God made women bear children because many men would’ve been too cowardly and opted out, making us go dodo. Men are fonder of abortion in surveys, not wanting to ban it in case god forbid they’re held responsible for once in their lives.
“If the court agrees to hear the case, it wouldn’t be deciding whether women have to register, just whether the current system is constitutional. If it isn’t, then it would then be up to Congress to decide how to respond, either by passing a law requiring everyone to register or deciding registration is no longer necessary.”
So it’s an offshoot of tranny stuff. Great.
“The issue of who has to register for the draft has been to the court before. In 1981, the court voted 6-3 to uphold the men-only registration requirement. At the time, the decision was something of an outlier because the court was regularly invalidating gender-based distinctions in cases about other areas of the law. Many of those cases were brought by the founding director of the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who became a justice in 1993.”
Unpatriotic scum gonna be unpatriotic. You’re on Ginsburg’s side of history.
Women are the national security, securing its literal biological future.
“The case about the draft is National Coalition For Men v. Selective Service System, 20-928.”
I think I’ve posted this before and I know I’ve recently spotlighted the dying demographic nations like Poland (lowest fertility rate in the EU).
But let’s look again and wonder how such steep changes could happen, shall we?
“Population growth in Eastern Europe is now negative, and Southern Europe is projected to join it with zero growth around 2005.
Western and Northern Europe, in contrast, are expected to maintain positive growth until around 2025 and 2040, respectively (figure 36). Declines in growth not only come earlier but are also much sharper in Eastern and Southern Europe than in Western and Northern Europe. Were international migration eliminated, zero growth in Western and Northern Europe would come instead much earlier, around 2005. With no migration, the growth trajectories for Western, Northern, and Southern Europe would still be roughly similar but would be pegged at a lower level, but the growth trajectory for Eastern Europe would be little changed. Looking beyond 2050, one sees each region return gradually to zero or slightly positive growth.”
But by all means think voting and anti-marriage propaganda will help…. It’s like demographic Santa. Babies can be wished into existence! What incentives? Also, EE, this is why you don’t traffic and pimp out your nubile young women to rich Arabs and STD-ridden tourists. You ate the demographic seed crop. If you continue to betray your women (fact: most white people are women) then you deserve to die out. Misogyny (as with misandry) are anti-natal. Figure 35 shows the wages of sin is death i.e. treason = extinction. The MRA/MGTOW anti-natal propaganda is largely the rejected gamma trying to genetically murder those above him (the coward’s way, Wormtongue) by fish bicycle logic. Surely you’re smarter than that? SJWs perform the same gamma/spiteful mutant function among women.
“The United Kingdom dominates Northern Europe demographically, with 64 per cent of regional population. Its growth trajectory is about 0.1 points higher than that for Northern Europe as a whole. The region also includes three small Baltic countries with economies in transition: Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Their growth trajectories are radically different, being even more negative than that for Eastern Europe. The remaining European countries with economies in transition are all in Eastern Europe, except for Albania and the successor states to Yugoslavia, which are in Southern Europe. However, growth in Albania and the former Yugoslav republics is not that different from, and actually slightly higher than, growth in Southern Europe as a whole. Southern Europe is dominated by Italy and Spain, whose projected slow growth is reflected in the regional trajectory.”
Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. Reprobate mind? Sexually decadent cultures?
“Projected fertility trends are consistent with the growth trends. Some initial fertility decline further below replacement is expected in this decade, except in Western Europe, where fertility is believed to have hit bottom in the early 1990s and has risen slightly since then (figure 38).” That’s Labour immigration policy.
“Each region is then assumed to reach total fertility of 1.85 by 2045-2050, with Northern and Western Europe progressing along a higher trajectory than Southern and Eastern Europe. Within the following quarter century, fertility is then expected to rise further to replacement level, with Southern Europe lagging behind the other regions.”
Yet I find it hilarious that Eastern Europe is taking the most degenerate of white trash immigrants, the PUAs. They’ll soon learn it isn’t even race of the immigrant, it’s whether they’ll render your local population infertile with STDs and cause local disruption with their carousing. Like the Vikings, they’ll take your women. It’s the rule. And if the local women refuse, like Taharrush, they’ll be forced. I’d expect druggings to become commonplace (including alcohol spikings) whenever PUAs move into an area.
Sort your incitement to rape laws NOW. Protect your culture. Don’t become like NY or London. Do not let the sexual locusts eat your nubile seed crop. r-types emigrate.
“Fertility stays at current levels in the constant projection scenario, which leads to incredibly large numbers for world population. For the European population, however, it leads instead, in the long run, to startlingly low numbers. By 2300, Western, Southern, and Northern Europe would each have only 28-30 million people, and Eastern Europe would have only 5 million. The European Union,which has recently expanded to encompass 452-455 million people (according to 2000 or 2005 figures) would fall by 2300 to only 59 million. About half the countries of Europe would lose 95 per cent or more of their population, and such countries as the Russian Federation and Italy would have only 1 per cent of their population left. Although one might entertain the possibility that fertility will never rise above current levels, the consequences appear sufficiently grotesque as to make this seem improbable.”
95 per cent or more of their population
and party countries like Italy and the world’s strip club Russia:
only 1 per cent of their population left
“sufficiently grotesque” is code for effective genocide folks
Also: You don’t judge whether something is POSSIBLE by emotional appeal.
See, you don’t need to kill everyone, just most of them, to prevent a functioning economy, especially the young people, and if you can keep them bachelors so much the better, because white people need to marry first before they breed. Distractions include careerism, the gym and notch counting.
“These changes take a century. Quicker societal adjustments are necessary when demographic change is rapid in the short-run, though such demographic changes tend to be more difficult to predict. Table 9 shows the highest and lowest growth rates expected for each country in any period between 2000 and 2300. Most of the largest positive growth rates appear in 2000-2005, while fertility is still high in various countries. The largest negative growth rates appear close to 2050 or beyond 2100, when countries enter a period of below-replacement fertility. European countries tend to show slowest growth earlier, African countries later, except for some Southern African countries where slow growth appears around 2020-2030 because of HIV/AIDS.”
or a SARs bioweapon.
Yet the anti-natal channels on Youtube are the only kind exempt from the so-called ‘redpill’ ban hammer.
Makes ya think. Activates the almonds. Rustles my jimmies. I wonder (((why))). They hate white males and they’re telling them to nix their genome with the snip or race mixing. I wonder why those channels are up? Why are so many pick-up artists non-white? And yes, that includes the Jews. When do we get the AQ – the Asian Question of them inserting themselves into our culture and policies? Hello fellow hwyte male. Let them slice your balls.
That’s the Boomer fallout, the consequences of all the dysgenic policies, from abortion to the Pill to free love/hook-up/whoredom to Asian and African immigration/invasion. I know some of you didn’t vote for it, it still exists. I’ll be considered generationally along Trigglypuff so deal with it.
TABLE 8 is a sobering read.
e.g. Croatia, millions of population, -27 by 2100, maximum 0% change. Stop importing degenerates.
Israel 63M by 2100, curious. 70% + max change. Almost like they knew.
Poland -33M by 2100. By all means, let degenerates immigrate. Make it worse.
BY contrast, Somali 658 million. Not a typo.
Serbia, -26 million by 2100. Were the shekels worth it?
I’m sorry I base my opinions on data.
By comparison, so-called cucked Sweden minus 8 million by 2100.
So Eastern Europe is literally worse off than the Swedes. Nobody says anything. Controlled ops.
UK gains 10M, mostly non-Anglo, I’d wager. The native pop is suppressed by (economic) factors and anti-marriage propaganda.
America gains 53M, mostly mystery meat if you look at new births and white deaths. Thanks, Boomers.
Yemen gains 700M. Not a typo.
“In 2000-2005, 56 countries, out of 192, have total fertility of 4.0 or higher. By 2045-2050, the number will be zero. Instead, 139 countries will have total fertility under 2.0. Beyond 2050, however, the progression is not unilinear. The number of countries with fertility below 2.0 will fall, as more and more countries return to a replacement level just above 2.0. But fertility levels of 2.2 or higher are not expected to return.”
So Marxism of any kind (including precious socialists) will go the way of the dodo. The production simply won’t be there to leech from.
You read the rest. This century, the white man dies. If they endorsed anti-natal practices, it’s deserved. Revenge is mine, saith the LORD.
We need exogenic wombs, it seems. Because there won’t be enough fertile women to go around.
If you want blood of the indigenous our leaders fucked up, try the Irish. We literally sold to foreigners the ample food supply we had (happens now with China and domestic food prices for us, as covered) and let them starve to death, including the women and children. Who needs a Holodomor when you have… whatever this is? Free trade is practically slavery, pass it on. Technically, arguments could be made for agrarian treason. We paid for those farmers to labour and toil for our plate, with our taxes. Monarchies have noblesse oblige. France learned the hard way. As I always said, we need national (loyal) capitalism, to protect the workers and People.
Do you really own your country if the CCP is buying up your precious farmland? Estate agents were despised for this reason, historically. They’ll sell you from under your very feet, no care for wars and national loyalty.
nb How is soaking a flag with blood, NOT incitement? What’s next, burning a Guy? He was white so….? I guess Catholicism was the first religion of pieces, technically. Which is the best kind of correct. Just like the Munster rebellion had the first religious rape gangs in Europe, under the guise of E Q U A L I T Y. The Left are seldom original.