Multicultural endgame

  1. Import invaders.
  2. Win without shot being fired as invaders kill your own competition.

The r-strategy. Triangulate others to do your dirty work.

This anti-white looks like Zuck.

I’ll believe California is superior when it gets out of debt by itself.

No bailouts for CA.

Let the celebrities pick up the human shit from the streets.

If they lost electricity for a month, many would be dead. Transformers are difficult to repair.

Can the Bible Belt stop sending them food and water too?

Relevant for :-

Apparently being in the majority is carte blanche, useful to remember since patriots are the majority.

Revenge fantasies and appeals to popularity when they think they’re winning.

Notable: They aren’t hiding the genocide anymore.

The future of American is Asian, by immigration, the Africans are being used.

http://time.com/3949424/chinese-immigrants-u-s/

Chinese have been immigrating long before the 60s, more like 1860s.

They act like whites are the new “Native” Americans.

Except white people wanted their own reservations and separate tax base, they wouldn’t let it happen. Section 8 and so on. In Europe, homeland of whites, it wasn’t even allowed there. Legal birthrights.

Multiculturalism is forced and it is an act of war. It is the new term for colonialism, rule by invaders. They hope you won’t notice but we did.

FREEDOM of association (and exclusion).

How will Q undo the genocide of forced assimilation?

Will he even reverse the

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

Q acknowledges the intentional dyscivic damage of multiculturalism but doesn’t seem to want to repair any of it…. I’m suspicious. Shooting Cabal and Co. in the face may be therapeutic but it doesn’t magically raise immigrant IQs. We won’t sit around in a circle chanting Kumbaya with the Muslims either. Remember, Cabal imported attackers. Deal with Cabal and you still have the foot soldiers.

Unless the vague “military planning” involves mass deportations, the white genocide of America will continue apace, Cabal or no.

Thank God the numbers of popularity they’re fed are fake. That’s what happens when you abort your strategic advantage.

It’ll be easy to spot them in future based on social media records. Actually can there be like an anti-patriot badge for those accounts?

Also:

They think they’re intelligent enough to be self-sufficient.

Dunning-Kruger strikes again!

It reminds me of the preppers who buy “survival” seeds stashed in a box. The seeds will die. It’s a living thing. By the time they rely on those, they won’t germinate. This is primary school biology.

Vegan propaganda

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/nov/01/third-of-britons-have-stopped-or-reduced-meat-eating-vegan-vegetarian-report

Note the link says one third that magically disappears.

Fake news, people who can afford to go to Waitrose are going to boutique butchers.

One in eight”

POOF! GONE!

“Britons is now vegetarian or vegan, according to a new report on food shopping that underlines a revolution in the UK’s eating habits.”
Invest in healthcare, there’s a boom in medical conditions on the horizon.

https://www.aarp.org/health/brain-health/info-10-2011/b12-level-affects-brain-size-health-discovery.html

Veganism: The brain aging diet?

Vegetarian and vegan are totally different diets, stop conflating them, the false equivalence gives me a Vitamin B12 deficiency brain shrinkage headache.

There’s also the blatantly obvious fact that more plants increases pesticide ingestion. Organic plants still contain a lot of pesticide, increasing intake substantially (% of diet) will steamroll omnivore consumption.

Plus the animal and bug murder of ‘pest control’.

https://www.quora.com/If-farmers-use-pesticides-to-kill-pests-doesnt-that-make-their-produce-not-vegan

A five year-old could understand that making food involves killing things, that also want to eat your food. Biological competition?

Here’s where they sneak in the propaganda:

A series of influential reports have said that avoiding meat and dairy products is the single biggest way consumers can reduce their environmental impact on the planet, because farming animals is such a CO2-intensive process.”

So is the article about a Waitrose survey or mysterious, unlinked (!) reports?

“Nick Palmer, the head of Compassion in World Farming UK says “Science proves that the healthiest diet is one that is plant-heavy. By eating less meat, fish, eggs and dairy

most food, then

and choosing higher welfare when we do, we can all help animals, people and the planet.””

Science proves no, it doesn’t.

Source? There are certainly no solid studies like that on vegans. We’ve been looking but all they hand us is hand-waving conjecture and reddit-tier self-report. Scientism promotes the high-fructose diet of veganism and their skin shows it.

Also, people are animals. If you really wanted to help the planet, you’d commit suicide. Total extinction of your carbon footprint, as a carbon-based life form.

The Waitrose info seems to confirm it’s a static fad, as in, no new people are taking it up.

Is that it? Also now it’s 1 in 5.

“Publication of the findings represents awkward timing for Waitrose.” PR. Fake news. A term banned in the press here now.
Faking data for the public should be illegal, especially when these people are dispensing medical advice.

Back to pure, organic bullshit:
“The number of vegans in the UK, who shun all animal products including dairy and eggs, has grown fourfold in the past four years from 150,000 to 600,000,”

Wait for it.

“…according to the Vegan Society.”
Would they lie to us? And that isn’t very encouraging considering rising obesity levels, what % of vegetarians and what % of vegans are overweight at all?

Look at the Waitrose data. There are tiny percentages involved.
For <50s, the number is static between age ranges. There is no movement.

The lines added represent the mean for almost all age groups, and it wobbles within 1-2%, nothing!

“Waitrose was the first UK supermarket to install dedicated vegan sections in 134 of its stores in May.”

Ah, this is an advert.

What’s the difference between a cucumber and a vegan cucumber?

What you do with it.

That justifies the price hike.

“This year, we’ve seen vegan food go mainstream” said Natalie Mitchell.

No, it isn’t, the rate of uptake isn’t higher with people under 30 or even 20.

If you’re gonna lie with statistics, get good with it?

“people are discovering that it tastes amazing.”

reconcile with

“Many of the vegan and vegetarian respondents said they missed bacon sandwiches and pork scratchings.”

“About 60% of vegans and 40% of vegetarians surveyed said they had adopted the lifestyle over the past five years, with 55% citing animal welfare concerns, 45% health reasons and 38% environmental issues.”

So what? Relevance? Make a different article proving that.

They don’t want to label halal meat, let alone ban its inhumane production in this country. They don’t care about the animals. Whatsoever.

There are no good studies I’ve seen on veganism altogether and vegetarian studies are fraught with method errors then environment – well, most new meat demand comes from China so you’re barking up the wrong tree. And their demand is only rising with their population boom.

https://www.globalmeatnews.com/Regions/Asia/China
https://data.oecd.org/agroutput/meat-consumption.htm

Behold! Real DATA!

That is not your imagination, Israel consumes BY FAR the most meat in the world (poultry value cinches it).

When are you shaming them, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Peru?

Are the Guardian calling on the UK government to reduce production in this country of Halal and Kosher meat (insufficiently or not at all stunned, torturing the animal?) and to stop selling it abroad, increasing cruel meat demand? No? Then they don’t care about the animals.

“Scientific research published this year found that without meat and dairy consumption, global farmland use could be reduced by more than 75% – an area equivalent to the US, China, the EU and Australia combined – and still feed the world.”

So who eats the most meat? Clue – not white people! Are we all meant to go on rations (worse than rations, majority food group eradication) for the supposed benefit of other people in the world who don’t?
Shaming people for eating, they’re totally serious.

Detour:

BCD – children deserve to develop properly and adults require adequate nutrition for fertility, especially women. I’m shocked the feminists are too dense to twig that shaming dairy is heavily sexist against women.

Before someone who can’t google gets triggered at the word ‘sexist’…

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070228064902.htm
“Researchers in the United States have found a link between a low-fat dairy diet and increased risk of anovulatory infertility.” For one study.

There is definitely a link between veganism (worse, no dairy) and female infertility which remains unexplored.

“In the drinks aisle, Waitrose singles out the popularity of organic wine.”

Alcohol is proven to permanently damage your DNA. Health reasons, huh? Not signalling?

Wine doesn’t have mental benefits over beer, either. It’s false stereotype.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/10/13/iq-and-alcohol-choices/

“Waitrose’s managing director, Rob Collins, said: “Being mindful of how we live and eat has become a priority in today’s world. As we become increasingly mindful of our own health, the wellbeing of our family and that of the planet, we’re reshaping how we shop, cook and eat.””

Read: consume less food so your betters can consume more, for the good of socialist globalism.

It won’t make you stupider, that’s impossible….

https://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/99legacy/6-14-1999a.html
“It was this new meat diet, full of densely-packed nutrients, that provided the catalyst for human evolution, particularly the growth of the brain…”

Fun fact: A lot of Hollywood goes vegan because it allows their body to handle more drug abuse.

https://munchies.vice.com/en_us/article/zmzjnw/is-cocaine-vegan-it-depends-on-who-you-ask

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/03/13/174205188/is-your-medicine-vegan-probably-not
“Is Your Medicine Vegan? Probably Not”

The Darwin Awards need a Vegan section.

http://www.veganfitness.net/viewtopic.php?t=271

“Some people avoid products that are tested on or derived from animals, but don’t feel drug-use, smoking, and the like are directly related to the issue of animal cruelty.”

http://gawker.com/5905479/woman-dies-of-starvation-while-on-an-all-sunlight-diet

Here’s an illustration of the issue I take with surveys on diet.

I hand-typed this.

https://www.vegsoc.org/sslpage.aspx?pid=753
Vegetarian Society:

2007 – 3618 adults
2009 – 3219 adults
2010 – 548 adults
2011 – 1031 adults
2012 – 1491 adults surveyed.

2007 – 3% vegetarian (more female), 2% vegan (more men).
2009 – 3% vegetarian, 5% partially (WTF is that? That’s normal).
2010 – 2% adults AND children vegetarian. Less than 1% vegan.
2011 – 2% adults AND children vegetarian. Less than 1% vegan.
2012 – 2% adults AND children vegetarian. Less than 1% vegan.

Reconcile with

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/food-and-drink/news/number-of-vegans-in-britain-rises-by-360-in-10-years/

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/apr/01/vegans-are-coming-millennials-health-climate-change-animal-welfare

Opposite politics, reporting the same shoddy “data”.
Thinks that make you go Hmmmmm….

What propaganda? Fake news is banned.

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20181023/19301840900/uk-government-screws-head-straight-bans-use-term-fake-news-govt-officials.shtml

You don’t need a phrase like that.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/440783/proportion-of-vegetarians-in-the-united-kingdom/

https://www.statista.com/statistics/562911/global-sales-growth-of-the-vegan-market-by-country/

“As of 2016, Asia Pacific held the largest share of vegan consumers globally, with approximately nine percent of people following a vegan diet in this area.”

What about the white minstrels?

Yeah, aren’t racial stereotypes evil? Or could they be reasonable at times?

Such as…. when they’re true?

My issue with those is that they aren’t true/were never true/are deliberately inflammatory and personally insulting in a way you simply couldn’t get away with, with any other race.

What would be the term for this? Crackaninny? The American media stereotype of certain white people as weak, silly and abusive.

Note: yeah is the redneck form of Yes, you all sound like that abroad.

In spite of the fact Brits have better teeth on average than the modern American (sure, blame corn syrup), our celebrities are rarely anorexic or fat and rugby players don’t wear padding and cups, unlike the NFL sissies.

“Dating” apps pushing race mixing

Of course, that was always the intended purpose of them, plenty of men are easy to influence, just look at pornography and all the unnatural acts it has made seem normal. There’s your flat birth rate. Then look how masculine the women look as “standard” from Jessica Alba to the Blurred Lines girl. Maybe we could get them under the Trades Descriptions Act? “I ordered a purebreed, not a mongrel. Fast shipping though but send it back.”

These guys think they’re really choosing. Look at various white models and look how much fake tan they put on compared to their real, pale photos. The difference is shocking. You’re not allowed to admire a white model unless she’s painted orange!

The illusion of sexual choice. They are deliberately making these women look less naturally attractive so you’ll directly compare to women with a similar skin tone who also wear a lot of make-up. Look at what passes for “porcelain” in foundation shades, it’s a push to shame anyone with fair complexions into changing that.

And what chemicals are even in fake tan?

I’ve seen race-mixing white guys try to claim their kids are white or get this, “honorary white” like WTF does that mean? Pay the toll, nobody is obligated to mix with your kids and statistically, they won’t! Trying to convince yourself “they count” is way too late to be thinking about it.

What about Jews with white or yellow fever, are they anti-Semitic?

Are homosexual men misogynists?

Why aren’t Grindr and Tindr combined, isn’t that sexist?

It’s the current year.

[they will, eventually]

Apparently your sexual orientation is a choice?

Shouldn’t we rewrite laws to account for that fact?

That’s so progressive it’s a circle, circular reasoning.

I’d bet money they also count Muslim as a race, and that’s partially what this is really about.

How dare you make a personal choice with your body!

This is society’s business! No privacy!

Everybody belongs to every body else!

You must perform like a whore for anyone willing to fuck you.

Sexual disgust is OUTLAWED.

No means you’re a bigot. Standards are oppression. /s

They’ve been doing this propaganda for over a century, come now.

https://www.kansascity.com/news/nation-world/national/article219361075.html

Free apps aren’t free, they’re psyops. They’ve been gathering information in experiments to manipulate you, the intended purpose of any info gathering.

This is also AA for ugly people.

Big Pharma profiting from the public disease risk is a bonus.

It works by foot in the door, you’d give someone a “chance” if it’s “just a date” but if confronted with the logic that dating eventually leads to breeding, marriage and children, that definitely clarifies preferences.

Who wants to break it to them that Richard Spencer actually prefers Asians to his fellow hu-whites? Libertarians are basically guaranteed to have an Oriental fetish, I wonder if it’s a low-level autism thing. I’d read that study. You thought the anime and cartoons did them no harm but woops, psyops telling them Asians are feminine despite shrill harpy manners in marriage browbeating the husband and bodies like little boys. It’s called priming.

Why don’t you have to list race and religion like sex and age in these apps? These are the questions that open a window into their strategy. They don’t want to match you, it’s white erasure.

Remember, white women are the least likely race and sex to miscegenate, no prizes for guessing who this is primarily aimed at but the surest way to weaken their resolve is to distract the white men with “exotic” women. Disheartened and freshly insecure, they make easy prey.

Multiculturalism is quite overtly cultural and genetic rape. It’s becoming obvious to anyone looking, they’re as good as saying you must breed with your conquerors.

 

They invented their own rape culture.

China’s been buying American food supply

Don’t skip this one. If you eat, this is important.

https://www.revealnews.org/article/how-china-purchased-a-prime-cut-of-americas-pork-industry/

That is a national security issue.
You need the food supply for your own nation.
I’ve yet to hear any politician here say this is a problem. For the whole West.
Britain is doing it too, as covered with our heritage pork industry but here’s America.

This is a plot.

“These are not Russian communists. They like Americans.”

Traitors, traitors everywhere.

Casual Russophobia, the shell game of politics.

Chinese companies, at the urging of their government, have launched a global buying spree, a new phase in their unprecedented economic experiment. And they’re targeting a resource that climate scientists, economists, the U.S. government, even Wall Street, all forecast will become dangerously scarce in the coming decades: food.”
“Food is poised to become the oil of the 21st century, with scarcity and demand creating a situation ripe for wars, riots and uprisings.
“We have a situation in the world food economy today where the growth in demand is exceeding the supply,” said Lester Brown, a food economist and founder of the Earth Policy Institute.
Food – namely crops such as soy, wheat and corn from which most other food products, such as pasta, bread and livestock meat, are derived – is in dwindling abundance as the world’s population grows ever larger, adding 220,000 mouths to feed every day.”

Need I say I told you so or is that Malthus’ place?

Thessalonians comes to mind.

“It is part of the transition from an age of surplus to one of scarcity,” Brown said.’

Read: FAMINE.

“The world is set for a geopolitical struggle over food.”

Those trigger war, we need a pandemic.

The Chinese government already is dealing with looming food shortages within its own borders as tens of millions are eating more as they move from poverty into the middle class. The government is pushing Chinese businesses – both state-owned and privately held – to gobble up agricultural resources from around the world, including Africa, Europe and the United States.”

That should be illegal as part of national security.

Food security, clue is in the name.

“With the Smithfield purchase, a Chinese company now owns 1 in 4 pigs raised in the U.S.”

But I’m imagining things and why do prices keep going up?

You’re funding fat Chinese citizens. To learn who rules over you….

“The question for U.S. lawmakers is: Did the Smithfield takeover represent business as usual for international commerce, or did it signal a concerted effort to control food supplies by one of the world’s most powerful governments?”

#yawn

“If the Chinese government was involved in the 2013 deal, some influential U.S. lawmakers say they need to take action to protect against foreign intervention in a vital U.S. resource.”

It’s more vital than stealing weapons technology in colleges.

“He testified to Congress that the Chinese government has no management control over Shuanghui.
That, however, is not the case.”

Ooooof course it is.

“a research lab that had genetically engineered the leanest pigs on earth”

Why modern pork isn’t as healthy as real pork. You can’t even get fatback anymore.
Bacon is a traditional Saxon meal, it merits legal protected status.
He goes on to blame the ‘shareholders’. No, put on your big boy pants and do the difficult job of telling them No.

“And Colaco knew Pope’s interest in buying a 20 percent stake in China’s largest meat company, Shuanghui International.”

How? Spying. And that’s bribery, the exchange ‘offer’.

The Chinese already consume half of the world’s pork,

greedy piggies

and they are growing wealthier and hungrier for meat every year. In a single generation, China’s fast-growing wealth has transformed a nation of impoverished rice and noodle eaters into the world’s largest middle class, which can increasingly afford meat in its diet.”

Any vegan who starts on the West instead of China doesn’t understand math. They calculate per person (wrong) but when you consider volumes, Asia is clearly starving out the rest of the world, including their precious Africa.
Most Westerners have been priced out of their birthright because suppliers are allowed to sell to foreigners first, rich ones.

Remember how the Chinese are eating most of it for the gaslighting lower down.

“Wan had transformed a government-owned slaughterhouse, where he was appointed manager in 1984, into China’s largest meat company”

Coincidence, I’m sure.

“Pope proposed to Wan that they take a 20 percent stake in each other’s companies. Smithfield would gain a powerful ally in Wan, who is politically connected to China’s top leaders and also a member of the National People’s Congress.”

Is Trump going to move on any of this?

“The partnership would be equal, reflecting the fact that although Smithfield Foods generated more than twice the revenue and was far more advanced in terms of global reach and pork technology than Shuanghui, growth rates in China were far higher.”

Doesn’t sound equal. That actually sounds like a downside, demand side loses in capitalism.

“It was a match made in free-market heaven.”

‘Libertarians’ are whores for the richest foreigner.
Treasonous whores.

Using the word free while selling out your country. For shame.

If libertarians didn’t sell the farm (cough) to China after WW2 their population would’ve stabilized as well and we wouldn’t have these problems.

And since when do we care so much about rich Chinese over our own people? That’s their Government’s problem, not ours. The rank classism of this reeks.

“Pope picked up the phone. Colaco cut straight to the deal. The Chinese were ready, he said. But it wasn’t a partnership they wanted.”

Classic manipulation tactic and the greedy piggy fell for it. Modern men are weak.

I’d have laughed and slammed the phone down.

“Smithfield is not for sale,” Pope shot back.’

Sure he did – and everybody clapped.

“But I do like this discussion,” he finished.’

Crooked CEOs are worse than politicians. The latter you can vote out and hang.

“Both Pope and Colaco told me that they remembered the call as cordial and succinct.”

You agreed to sell a part of your country’s history quickly?

“The Chinese didn’t want to save him. They wanted to buy him.”

Well, he is a whore. They were right.

New Money, they think if they buy the world they ‘win’ and become the new dominant Empire.
Treat everyone like a whore for sale is their MO.

“The U.S. Treasury Department was in the midst of reviewing the takeover for any national security risks. That review, by an obscure office within the department, was to remain classified per U.S. law.”

It should’ve been cancelled, simple as.
Here’s the part I mentioned before, Americans priced out of America.

“Two years earlier, the Chinese government had signaled its strong desire for overseas agriculture. It had unveiled its five-year plan, which amounts to the Communist Party’s roadmap for the country’s economy. A major focus of this plan: buying up overseas farmland and foreign food companies.

Why is American homesteading land so expensive, Americans?

In 2011, the year the five-year plan was announced, Chinese nationals owned $81 million worth of U.S. farmland.

Repatriate it, simply refuse to acknowledge their ownership claim as valid due to foreign security issues. We do it all the time.

By the end of 2012, the Chinese owned $900 million in U.S. farmland – a 1,000 percent increase – making them the largest buyers that year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

You should’ve known when they changed the soldier breeding programme to two children despite over-population.

The Smithfield deal included another $480 million in U.S. farmland, which would push the Chinese stake to nearly $1.4 billion in less than two years.”

Successful nations don’t sell land or companies to outsiders.
This should be the law, it needs to be enforced. It’s a type of border control.

“He testified that the Chinese government had absolutely no management control in Shuanghui.”

He lied, was he under oath?

“Pope explained that the deal would create jobs in the U.S., not destroy them. Shuanghui’s plan to import more American pork would ramp up production at Smithfield’s 460 hog farms, creating more money for farmers and more jobs at the slaughterhouses.”

And more food to a foreign army to kill all the people you ‘gave’ jobs.
Don’t work with Commies, eventually they’ll shoot you too.

“I think it is good for America. I think this is the opportunity America has been looking for to import jobs.”

Wait, visas?

“Stabenow pushed back. She wanted to know why Smithfield could not increase its sales to China as an American company and why only a takeover by a Chinese firm would open the doors to the world’s largest pork market. The Chinese government was unfairly blocking American hog farmers from exporting there, she said.”

A patriot. They ignored her, didn’t they?
She was right, so they did.

“American grain companies had supported the deal. In the past five years, China has become their biggest foreign customer.”

You say ‘American’.

Is it (((American)))?

“Roberts lampooned criticism of the deal, asking Pope, “Did you realize you were the victim of a Chinese communist plot?”
Laughter broke out in the hearing. Pope chuckled.”

They know it’s treason.

“For Wan, who had served as a foot soldier in Mao Zedong’s army….”

Was he one of the cannibals?
[Probably].

“Shuanghui is now China’s largest meat company, and with the addition of Smithfield Foods, it has become the world’s largest producer of packaged meats, pumping out millions of tons of hot dogs and sausages every year.”

As American as your hot dogs?
Armies need protein.
The signs were there.

“The campus also has a massive refrigerated warehouse larger than a football field. It houses something found only in China: a national pork reserve. Much as the U.S. government maintains a strategic oil reserve, China stashes away vast amounts of frozen pork in case of price inflation or war. The mammoth warehouse I was staring at housed 110 million pounds. It is one of the many pork-reserve warehouses that Shuanghui operates for the government across China.”

ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED.

“or war”, they write blithely.

Hoping you won’t notice. But we did.

“He said Smithfield’s processing equipment was three times faster.”

Great deal for them – America not so much.

“It also stated something surprising. Shuanghui is required to adhere to Beijing’s five-year plan, the Communist Party’s national economic agenda. And the document was clear. Shuanghui meets its obligations and follows the path laid out by the Communist Party.”

Are you surprised? I’m not.

“Despite its public listing in Hong Kong, Shuanghui answers to the Chinese government – going beyond regulatory compliance. It receives directives from Beijing, and it follows them. The company’s candidness surprised me, especially because U.S. senators had been sparring over this exact topic a year earlier. Here was conclusive proof.”

Is the sell-out in jail? No? Wow, almost like a Cabal is protecting him.

“He broke it down for me. The Chinese government acts like a de facto board of directors for the country’s domestic industries – even for publicly traded companies like Shuanghui. The Communist Party issues the five-year plan, and Shuanghui is expected to follow that direction. The government can say it wants the Chinese meat industry to employ certain strategies, and all domestic companies are expected to adhere. Yet the day-to-day management of the company, how it chooses to carry out those directives, is left to the company’s management. And if there is no directive, the company is free to proceed as it views best.”

Communism.

“For helping carry out the government’s agenda, Shuanghui received a $4 billion loan to take over Smithfield. The loan was approved in a single day.”

Woooow.

“I asked Robert Wan why the government was so interested in Shuanghui’s business.
“Pork is considered a national security issue in China,” he said.”

BOOM.

Pork is considered a national security issue in China”

oh, but the guy acting white was really gracious? He was laughing at you.

You can’t spend their fake money if you’re dead.

“They are entering a new phase of development, one that is taking them outside of China’s borders as they look to acquire companies and farmland overseas.”

How was WW2 won? Farms.

Watch the farms.

“The jobs will remain. But they will be lower-quality, lower-paid jobs of hog slaughtering and hog breeding,” she said. “The higher-paid, higher-value-added jobs that deal with marketing the products, processing the food, the technology development, that will go.”

Again, Libertarians are whores. Free market is code for globalist. We used to just call those traitors.

“With its five-year plan in 2011, the Chinese government identified meat processing as a strategically important industry, and with the Smithfield purchase, the country gained access to the world’s most advanced animal rearing, slaughtering and meat processing and distribution technology, she said.”

National security, you’ve boosted theirs.

“Haley has testified before Congress several times on how China’s growth is damaging the U.S. economy.”

They ignored her.

“The Chinese will quickly import Smithfield’s technology to China”
“The United States increasingly will become a large hog farm for the Chinese”

Think of the cost if they included the oil barrels to ship. Why isn’t that law?
Globalization will fail for that reason, spending $20 to send a product halfway around the world and ‘save’ 20 cents is doomed to fail.

“Hog farming is one of the most polluting industries in the world, and so that will occur in Smithfield and elsewhere, the 400-plus farms that Smithfield and now Shuanghui owns around the United States,”

Well at least America gains in pollution.

“But here it is in its simplest form: Haley has found that China begins by importing the technological know-how and raw materials from the U.S. Then Chinese businesses use cheap labor to manufacture products for export back to the United States – offering lower prices in direct competition with established businesses in the U.S. This part of her theory is obviously not new.
But here is where she advances the conversation: She has found that even in industries in which the labor cost of the final product is relatively low, meaning it accounts for 2 to 7 percent of the total, Chinese companies still are able to sell the product for 25 to 30 percent less than their American competitors. In other words, China’s big advantage is not just the cheaper labor.
So what is it? Heavy subsidies from the Chinese government, she says.”

War. Trade war.
The Trojan Horse of Trade.

When you think about it, globalism is really a way of saying international Marxism because it erases national borders and fulfills the “to each according to his ability…” dogma.

“Chinese businesses are able to undercut the prices of American producers and begin to control a larger and larger share of the market.”

You need to shame people for buying Chinese.

The oil barrels used to ship, the slave labour, lots of ways to go about it.

The quality argument, they did knowingly sell toxic baby formula.

“In two to five years, we will start noticing major changes in the United States. China will be in many agricultural sectors, not just pork. China will start acquiring much larger farms, for example. China will start consolidating,” she said. “So, in these oligopolistic industries, such as pork, where four manufacturers control over 75 percent of the American pork industry, there will be much price cutting, layoffs, etc., as competitors start feeling the hot breath of China on their necks.”

That’s now.
Good luck MAGA with that millstone.

I don’t hate China, as some shills have claimed, I love my people in America. If America fails, we’re on the block next.
China is oppressing them in the most under-handed ways in a manner tantamount to a declaration of war. Stealing food supply? Super-villain territory.

BTW, you’re still paying China foreign aid.

““The Chinese, in my opinion, are behaving rationally. Food is in short supply in China. It’s a source of unrest in China,” Haley said. “They have OK’d the acquisition of agriculture in the United States to further Chinese interests.”

Anti-American interests.

“China and the U.S. are roughly the same size geographically – about 3.7 million square miles. But China has more than four times as many people to feed.

r-selection ends predictably
the checks won’t clear eventually

And it has less arable land than the U.S.”

As in, without buying America’s food security, they’d instantly lose a war.
It’s cheaper for them to buy America itself than buy from America every year.

“Moving toward a meat-centric diet has put an incredible strain on China’s agriculture system. Simply put, Chinese farmers can no longer keep up.”

By buying from China, you’re directly supporting the Chinese Communist government.

Communists make the best slavers, they actually believe they’re doing good.

‘Chinese officials only recently have recognized the futility of their long-cherished national goal of food self-sufficiency, said Fred Hu, former head of Goldman Sachs for greater China.

Not high IQ then. As if the Marxism didn’t give it away.

China will have to import a large quantity of foods from all over the world,” said Hu, a Chinese national who helped raise funds for Shuanghui and now advises his government.

Until we blockade it. Which we’ll have to, to feed our own people.

He agreed with Haley that food is increasingly a matter of political stability for the Chinese government.
“We have a one-party state, and the Communist Party depends on its ability to deliver economic prosperity and consumer satisfaction,” Hu said. “In that way, for the severe shortage of any particular food item, or very significant price inflation, that could be a source of public discontent.”’

The way to beat China is ruthless capitalism, stop buying from them and jack up the prices.

“The government also ordered its domestic food producers to scour the globe, buying foreign companies and agricultural resources that China could control in the coming decades”

During a war, your enemy owns your food. Who wins?

Seige warfare on vulnerable domestic civilians is sneaky little ratbag warfare. Typical r-types. Attack the children, elderly and sick. They suffer first under food supply disruptions.

China is securing food supplies – increasingly, high-end food such as meat – for its middle class.”

You said national security, that means military.

“The U.S. still enjoys probably the highest living standards in the world,” he said. “My advice for you in the West, after your criticisms, is that you probably should eat less meat to control weight and to stay healthy, right?”

Gaslighting microdick. That’s a Mean Girls tier insult.

He just tried to neg white people. They’re really insecure, huh?

Actually eating meat is healthier and Americans are fat due to processed carbs, they know this.

Trump should specially stamp every product from China or a Chinese company so people have informed consent when buying.

That’s the best, simplest solution. Totally legal, more legal than the current labelling.

PRODUCT OF CHINA in huge letters on the front with the Marxist symbol in blood red.

So other people can see you’re buying it too.

After all, informed consent. People should know which government and ideology their money supports.

Actually, why isn’t there a public list of companies that seem domestic but are actually foreign owned? People have a right to boycott if they please.

“Everyone wants to see China succeed. It’s an old civilization,” she said.

No, if they win, you lose. Zero sum. They’re heartless monsters, their culture is one of torture.

“But it is our government’s prerogative and our government’s responsibility to look out for the interests of U.S. consumers and U.S. industry, just as the Chinese are looking out for their industry and their customers.”

trans. Do your job. You’re not Mother Theresa.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, who asked Haley to testify before the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, said the U.S. government needs to do more to protect U.S. agriculture.
She is calling on the Treasury Department, which reviews foreign acquisitions of major U.S. businesses, to expand the definition of national security to include food. Such a change could prevent future takeovers of America’s farm and food companies.
Food is too vital an industry for the American people to allow it to be undercut by the Chinese government in the way that it has happened in other industries, Stabenow said when I visited her office in Washington.
“Food security is national security,” she said. “It’s as much a threat for Americans if we don’t control our own food supply as it is if another country gets some kind of defense secret.”

Food production is a defense secret.

In tiny text again: “Food is poised to become the oil of the 21st century, with scarcity and demand creating a situation ripe for wars, riots and uprisings.”

Pope still denies the Government connection, meaning he knew all along.

“But for the first time, he publicly acknowledged the Chinese government’s five-year plan.”

Traitor.

“In many respects, this is carrying out the government’s five-year plan, which is to improve the quality and the security of their food supply,”

Keyword: security.

“Pope said Smithfield Foods now is transferring its technology to China”

Muh jobs!
Maybe Pope giving a blowjob under the table to the Chinese Government.

“It will process the meat in China and sell it under the Smithfield brand, according to the company.”

How many American brands have been gutted?
Do the American people not have a right to know in the labeling?

It’s false advertising to use an American brand for a non-American company.

Cultural appropriation is serious business. Especially when it’s used to subvert the culture in question.

“I handed him the Bank of China document that stated the government’s financial support for the deal.”
“I think the concern that others should have is that there’s going to be more foreign companies wanting to buy U.S. companies,” Pope said. “We need to have a bit of concern that what we’ve got, others value more than we do.”

The nerve.

Your choice, America. Label your products correctly or allow foreign governments to literally buy your food over you.

Currently, a lot of “your” food is reserved for a Chan or Wan. The good stuff.

Oh, and stop remittance. That’s an easy one. You hemorrhage money there. Tax it to the hilt.

Scummy people

https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2018/10/08/white-women-get-warned-about-hijacking-kneeling-during-the-national-anthem-to-protest-rape-culture/
White women, know your place.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/733275/super-gonorrhoea-epidemic-Freshers-week-STI-STD-UK-epidemic
They’ll expect me to fund their infertility treatments in twenty years.

Assuming they’re still alive.

https://nypost.com/2018/10/03/rapist-sentenced-to-thousands-of-years-in-prison-kills-himself/
Meanwhile the sentence is here is non-existent.

Deterrent sentences work.

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/hero-abortionist-sold-drugs-reused-instruments-gave-women-stds/

Implying catching an STD at a clinic by default rampant with them on various surfaces isn’t a risk?

Why are specula not all disposable?

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2014/06/14/how-clean-is-your-pap-smear-that-metal-speculum/

Why aren’t they used in male prostate exams, if it’s really nothing to worry about?

Race and ill health

Scrambling for nurture excuses, are we?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25526/

Fails to account for IQ, social mobility isn’t equally possible.

The participant with a higher visual acuity gets the pilot position.

Unless they’re seriously suggesting we should dole out positions and their responsibility (legal) on the incompetent? That sounds more like a curse on them.

The simpler explanation (Ockham) is that health impacts the ability to strive and lower IQ causing poorer lifestyle choices compounds the ill health as a permanent feature.

How to truly test this?
Within a race, some castes do poorly and this is both represented in lower IQ scores than their genetic kin as well as “poor” health. Where one caste e.g. Western-living Indians, represents a middle-class (as in the UK), white people are at a distinct disadvantage – disproving and debunking the privileged status hypothesis. So-called “positive discrimination” or reverse racism, leads more opportunities to the class who least deserve it (financially stable) purely on the basis of race (racist).

Race isn’t a qualification. To treat it as any sort of meaningful status opposes the Race Relations Act.

The BBC should’ve been stripped of taxpayer funding the moment it refused to hire white people, the taxpaying majority. As a point of fact, how come they’re allowed to turn a private profit? Isn’t that also a monopoly?

You can’t study class and discrimination without classism but ah! They won’t do that!

Wonder why.

How hard do white natives work to reach a given position, eh?

The question never published nor studied.

Who has it easier? It would be easy to study but I’ve seen nada.

Does meritocracy cease to apply if your skin has a certain level of pigment?

Is this the new coffee-coloured aristocracy? Reign of error.
When you hire someone on the basis of skin colour, you make everyone who looks like them look similarly incompetent. Who’s racist?

Public interest, equality in hiring/promotion/wages and all that.

Favouring one party is a direct oversight spurning the other.

Over-representation is treason. i.e. Should whites govern Africa?

Bias is scientifically proven, ruling over the outgroup impartially is impossible for all races.

Whose interests do they represent in practice? That would prove neutrality, if they also plugged white and poor causes. …No? Have they ever represented the majority …. in a democracy? Anything less is indeed treason.

It comes down to this: who pays the academic’s share of taxes for these divisive papers?

Are the poor working two or more jobs expected to slave away for those who write inciteful documents encouraging their oppression?