An affront to human dignity

Not only will this be applied to men by gay guys with programming skills (introducing a way of faking harassment) BUT the timing of this accomplishes 2 things:

  1. any dodgy blackmail photos from Hollywood pedos can now be called fake, plausibly
  2. this can be applied to Christian wives, virgin women and little girls. It’s a blackmail app.

It revokes the right to not be humiliated (as in times of war) from Christian, moral women.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/kzm59x/deepnude-app-creates-fake-nudes-of-any-woman

Being seen naked is a specific form of medical consent, lock the programmer up.

Use of likeness to produce illegal porn, passing off as real, distribution without model release signatures, violating religious right to modesty etc.

It violates fraud law, there’s defamation, human rights violations especially dignity, this is NOT Brave New World, America.

You are not entitled to other people’s bodies. Sexualization of unwilling participants is anti-human.

The Jews of Hollywood have failed to capture Gen Y and Z white women (more conservative than previous generations) so now fall back on this to digitally force them into prostitution.

Digital sex slavery. Cyber sex slaves. Bravo, atheistkult, another pillar of civilization besmirched.

Simply mock up the programmer’s mother in various pornographic poses to really drive the evil of this home.

I don’t think this software actually exists, more of an advanced form of photoshop.

Still illegal as sin. Public vice should be publicly shamed.

America is Freud’s retarded stage of genital fixation.

The strategy behind UBI

The Left is quiet… too quiet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy

They’re hoping for Weimar Mark Two, the useful idiots.

Only works from a homogeneous, high IQ economy starting from scratch. Then, not for long. R-types are not low time preference, all economic systems must be. The sociopaths leading them know this will not work – but it will end Western Civ, if we allow it.

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a socialist system of “a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty”.[1][2]

Parasitic terrorism.

Not to be confused with Going Galt, a self-sufficient minimizing play.

If all are paid by the state, all are owned by it. Communism through the backdoor.

“Fine, I’ll just quit”

How long until they start forcing you to work?

At gunpoint, like China.

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/03/24-4

They stated that full enrollment of those eligible for welfare “would produce bureaucratic disruption in welfare agencies and fiscal disruption in local and state governments” that would: “…deepen existing divisions among elements in the big-city Democratic coalition: the remaining white middle class, the working-class ethnic groups and the growing minority poor. To avoid a further weakening of that historic coalition, a national Democratic administration would be constrained to advance a federal solution to poverty that would override local welfare failures, local class and racial conflicts and local revenue dilemmas.”[3]

Endgame of multiculturalism, melting pot BS.

White genocide via UBI wiping out any hope of family formation.

Written in the 60s, openly.

“The remaining white middle-class” – 1966

Clear racial plotting there.

They further wrote:

Marxists cause poverty, civil war, food shortages and mass murder.

Who do you think is in their sights this time?

And give away all individual rights and freedoms – for a trivial sum.

Imagine – the Fed buys you for a few grand – before triggering hyperinflation, making all that fiat worthless, openly.

Do not underestimate their evil.

“eliminate poverty” reminds me of those robot simulators that end human suffering – by ending humans

This is how their depopulation starts.

This is the bait on the hook, the procession into the slaughterhouse – the weight of those behind pushing you forward.

Greed is a deadly sin. Did Jesus bail out the moneylenders?

https://www.biblehub.com/matthew/21-12.htm

” 12 Then Jesus went into the temple courts and drove out all who were buying and selling there. “

Let all investors fail – banks, houses, stock, all of them. Greed is evil. Greed is theft. It’s theft from the people who worked three jobs to pay into a system that hands ‘free’ shit to illegals for free.

The people who bought newfangled high risk (sub-prime) student loan debt, debt bondage, have actually bought slaves… that’s illegal, innit? Let the investors FAIL.

Historically, “pensions” will really kill the West. Without full military service + career, nobody deserves one for surviving. Rome’s dotage villas given to politicians killed it financially. Pensions are UBI for people with decades to save – too lazy. There’s your primary cause of r-selection – why not have high time preference? I’ll get a state pension. Gen X, Y, Z will spit on their graves.

from counter signal memes

If you won’t cut off the leeches (yes, even the skinny ones with a sob story) they will choke you.

The first Free Shit Brigade has white hair and acts like they fought in a real war when they imported the next one. They expect other people’s non-aborted children to pay for their nude cruises (seriously, it’s out there) and are single-handedly responsible for increasing Western STD rates, by age group.

Turns out, if your dyscivic, dysgenic, degenerate society funds feckless, naive, gullible, bleeding-heart coffin-dodgers with the lifeblood of the young – those young cannot breed and everybody dies. But ‘free’ ‘love’ amirite? All that expensive divorce and child abuse tho.

Pocket money is for children, not stolen from them.

long story short – don’t let the Boomers leave California. Make the people who lived in Dem zones the longest fucking stay there and LIVE WITH IT.

Send them the bill of everything that their votes wanted – their cut.

Personally I don’t ‘get’ how a person can pass 21 and still be so gullible. Let alone 50.

Michael Reisch and Janice Andrews wrote that Cloward and Piven “proposed to create a crisis in the current welfare system – by exploiting the gap between welfare law and practice – that would ultimately bring about its collapse and replace it with a system of guaranteed annual income. They hoped to accomplish this end by informing the poor of their rights to welfare assistance, encouraging them to apply for benefits and, in effect, overloading an already overburdened bureaucracy.”[4

debt debt debt

yes, because America (already unable to pay off it’s ‘debt’ if it sold literally everything – to China) could use more debt

5 Things That Will Happen To You When America Goes Bankrupt

(China hasn’t been buying into the FED, it’s been buying an IOU on American soil).

Think margin call with farms, American food supply.

https://www.thebalance.com/will-the-u-s-debt-ever-be-paid-off-3970473

Howard Phillips, chairman of The Conservative Caucus, was quoted in 1982 as saying that the strategy could be effective because “Great Society programs had created a vast army of full-time liberal activists whose salaries are paid from the taxes of conservative working people.”[6]

They had to weaken the working class poor for decades to gain any hope of success. Get their kids uneducated, fathers deadbeat because partially factories left overseas, force the mothers to work, get them all drug addicted. Weaken middle, real America so they beg for it in the next Depression. Like the New Deal conjob.

America media is ChiCom owned

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/most-of-the-msm-in-america-is-pro-china-and-anti-america-heres-why/

I’m sure the libertarians will have a cucky explanation.

Let’s start with the fact that 90% of all American media is controlled by 6 companies and who they are:

www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6

Now let’s see which of these companies are investing in China and which are not.

Let’s start with GE:

www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2017-11/08/content_34271935.htm

Now Disney:

skift.com/2018/11/08/disney-ceo-still-bullish-on-china-despite-shanghai-park-slump/

Viacom:

www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/viacoms-mtv-nickelodeon-unveil-china-partnerships-at-mipcom-1152607

Time Warner:

www.broadcastingcable.com/news/time-warner-inks-investment-partnership-china-media-capital-114529

CBS:

www.cbscorporation.com/cbs-studios-international-and-chinese-streaming-platform-iqiyi-announce-licensing-agreement-for-the-late-late-show-with-james-corden/

www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/cbs-censors-the-good-fight-for-a-musical-short-about-china

Then there is News corp. which owns Fox, wall street journal and NY post:

www.reuters.com/article/us-newscorp-china/news-corp-sells-controlling-stake-in-china-tv-channels-idUSTRE67810L20100809

I have done you the favor of posting the evidence that led to my theory. It’s very clear in Black and white. Do yourself a favor and actually read them. You can see the fact that the media controlled by the “left” is heavily invested in China. While the media of the “right” sold it’s Chinese businesses in 2010.

So it’s not crazy to make the connection between the hate spewed by all the media groups on the left towards Trump with China. When those same companies are heavily invested in China. It’s also not crazy to make the connection that the one media company not heavily invested in China, is also the one media company that doesn’t attack every single word and action he says and does.

I’m just going by what the “big picture” shows…

Importing misogyny

Anti-white misogyny only.

They just can’t admit it openly.

I no longer trust “right-wing” news reporters, especially alternatives, because they completely missed out this viral video as the true reason France simply began to enforce its harassment law.

Fine, you lie and omit like the left, I won’t trust you like the left.

It doesn’t even have to be sexual harassment, people have a right to walk down the street in peace. It isn’t a strip club and both parties know the attention is an insult. Nobody has a right to take up your time or get your response. We’ve all been eased into this with comedians being cunts and calling it ‘a prank’ or with charity people on the street, in the UK they can’t legally come up to you anymore actually, begging is illegal. As harassment. They can’t even shake those donation tins, it’s coercion. Nothing to do with sex, just basic respect.

These little cowards wouldn’t dare be aggressive in public to men, they pick on the weaker sex like an animal. Notice he chose a lone, thin woman, who clearly couldn’t physically defend herself.

Why don’t most women risk dressing up anymore? Femininity is punished.

The First World must enforce its standards of decency and oppose this American lechery.

Hollywood’s been teaching these people lies.

White people don’t exist to please you. 

White men won’t pay you, white women won’t flirt with you. We don’t want you here, nobody asked you to come here.

Trotsky, pusher of the concept ‘racism’

http://www.amerika.org/politics/yes-leon-trotsky-invented-the-word-racism/

Implying that acting with free will is a bad thing.

[inc. freedom of association].

Pro-pathological altruism and demographic suicide.

If something happens throughout society, you needn’t indoctrinate kids in its existence in school.

An exclusive category with no exclusions is an illusion, it doesn’t exist.

If you can’t say what it isn’t, it’s unfalsifiable.

I wonder if this might be oppressive to a race, therefore invalid because if the concept of racism itself is racist, there’s also no such thing.

From an academic paper covered previously. That quoted is the indisputable fact, unless you deny Darwin.

https://www.toqonline.com/archives/v8n3/TOQv8n3Hamilton.pdf

Lefties are the real Creationists.

If Darwin were taught in schools, nobody would fall for equalism.

Oh, the crime of being an unwanted fetus.

Make an update for the next election, someone.

e.g. Humans are greedy bastards never to be trusted versus Social engineering is good and public sector workers deserve better pensions than the taxpayer.

Violence is wrong, it’s against democracy versus Won’t do as we say? Prison! No? We’ll shoot you!

You must be tolerant versus “Social Justice” is noble to destroy you.

Genocide is wrong versus You don’t deserve to live in peace.

We celebrate diversity versus White people don’t belong here.

If you hurt them, that’s evil versus if they hurt you, it’s okay when they do it.

Credit: cannot find source. Definitely not me.

Pedos self-expose eventually

They have a Common Purpose.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/462604/We-can-t-prove-sex-with-children-does-them-harm-says-Labour-linked-NCCL

Apparently decades of observed mental illness, substance abuse, attachment disorder, later divorce, the cycle of abuse with their own children, trauma including PTSD and high suicide rates don’t count as ‘harm’.

Apparently they need to spontaneously combust.

in context

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/11/labour-bought-data-on-more-than-1m-mums-and-their-children-emmas-diary

that one went down the memory-hole… put it back

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/outrage-as-yorkshire-vicar-calls-lgbti-lessons-state-sponsored-child-abuse-1-9812091

Rapist nanny state, called it.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/06/01/one-cult-to-rule-them-all-one-cult-to-find-them/

Sex Ed is grooming, people. Sexualisation of minors is grooming.

In full, top article:

“PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “paedophile love”.

reduced to zero

campaign for sweetest spot on a stake

Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.

Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.

It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.

They’re already prosecuting like this in cases by the CPS.
Minors can’t cry rape because their rapist is claiming willing.

And gets away with it. Look at the law.

Sick world.

‘Rape gangs’ are actually sex slave owners. It’s slavery.

(Pedo rings are just one form of sex slavery.)

Actually, consent documents would be a good idea but it’s called a marriage certificate.

‘Consent’ is a will o’ wisp for predators.

“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.

“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.

Gaslighting, victim blaming.

“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.

Sexual predator says its teeth aren’t sharp.

“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”

Justice is dead.

Mrs Hewitt, 65, was general secretary between 1974 and 1983. After days of intense pressure, the former Labour MP for Leicester West finally admitted last week the NCCL was “naive and wrong” over its ties to PIE.

Sure. Save the hive.

She said: “Any suggestion that I supported or condoned the vile crimes of child abusers is completely untrue.

Er….

“As the NCCL archives demonstrate, I consistently distinguished between consenting relationships between homosexual men, on the one hand, and the abuse of children on the other.

men, not minors

and plenty of men are raped regardless

“When Jack Dromey, as NCCL chairman in 1976, vigorously opposed PIE at the NCCL AGM, he did so with the full support of the executive committee and myself as general secretary.”

However Labour MP Dromey’s opposition to PIE has been questioned by its former chairman, convicted paedophile Tom O’Carroll, who claims he felt “welcome” at NCCL meetings where he sat on the gay rights sub-committee.

Now they’re teaching it in primary schools!

Step by step instruction.

Mr O’Carroll said: “While they did not like PIE and did nothing to support our objectives, they were afraid of appearing insufficiently ‘right on’.

Thought Prison: “Effectiveness is irrelevant: for political correctness abstract and altruistic allocation is intrinsically superior to human agency; it is therefore morally necessary to replace individual freedom with systemic coercion, regardless of the consequences.”

Coercion vitiates consent. We, the People, do not consent.

“Consequently they were nothing like as strenuous and public in their efforts to distance themselves from PIE as they are now claiming.

“Dromey is quoted as saying ‘I was at the forefront of repeated public condemnations of PIE and their despicable views’. That’s news to me. Maybe by ‘public’ he meant imprecations muttered to cronies at his local pub.”

Dromey’s wife Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour party, was legal officer at the NCCL between 1978 and 1982. She has expressed her “regret” over the NCCL’s involvement with PIE but has pointedly declined to apologise.”

Bring back hanging when?

We need a referendum on how to deal with paedophiles.

*scroll*
COMMENTS UNAVAILABLE

I could think of a few.