What happens to teenage rape victims?

Another reason forced marriage in a society or “child brides” are barbaric.

Plus a side track on promiscuity, statist preventable disease enabling and STD gene evolution.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X04002575

“Results
The lifetime prevalence of forced sex for females and males was 10.2% and 5.1%, respectively.

I’m disgusted by that alone.

What a “revolution”.

Feed the entitlement of (serial*) rapists.

For the overall sample, feeling sad/hopeless(odds ratio [OR] 1.9), having considered (OR 2.1) or attempted (OR 1.4) suicide, being a victim of physical dating violence (OR 2.8) heavy cigarette use (OR 1.4), binge drinking (OR 0.7), having multiple recent sexual partners (OR 8.3) and unprotected sex (OR 1.7) were correlated with a history of forced sex. Among females, associations were found among sad/hopeless feelings (OR 1.6), having considered suicide(OR 2.2), fighting (OR 1.3), physical dating violence (OR 2.1) heavy cigarette use (OR 1.8), multiple sexual partners (OR 9.3) , alcohol/or drug use before sex (OR 1.6) and unprotected sex (OR 1.5). Among males, associations were found among sad/hopeless feelings (OR 1.8), attempted suicide (OR 1.9), gun carrying (OR 1.8), physical dating violence (OR 4.3), multiple sexual partners (OR 7.8), unprotected sex (OR 1.9), and other ethnicity (OR 3.3).

Conclusions
Although a history of forced sexual intercourse affects a small number of adolescents,

10% of girls isn’t small….

1 in 20 boys neither?

it is an important public health issue. The psychological and behavioral correlates of forced sexuality

Flashback to all the statist propaganda of Sex Ed.

If we adults can’t be trusted with guns or sugary drinks because they enable bad behaviour, what about practically Tantric marital sex guides given to single, horny teenagers, along with condoms and pills?

Is that not encouraging anti-social behaviour?

The emphasis on “safe” sex is denying the legitimacy of celibacy. It assumes everyone is a slut. They can get that information online anyway. Innocence is illegal because explicit, brain-altering pornography is freely available (no credit card wall to safeguard from child access).
A single person shouldn’t be sleeping around, the touted health benefits of sex are statistically non-existent (compared to real exercise, comparing anything to a couch potato would be a benefit, that’s just bad science) and psychologically they’d be better off handling matters themselves if physically desperate than endangering everything from their marriage prospects to their mental health to their future cancer death risk.

Then there’s the rape allegation from sexual coercion, which is legally valid. How many teenagers are taught that instead of an ugly form of physical entitlement a la Brave New World?

Sex is the adult marker. Yes, it is serious and should be taken deadly seriously. The fallout of a sex life can get you killed (crime of passion is a legal defence in France).
Parents shouldn’t allow sexually active children to live with them anymore. It’s abnormal and contributes to this culture of infantile adults, with all the endorphin-producers and none of the struggle to get them. They regress and functionally retard themselves because those rewards signal the brain that it needn’t develop further, having earned the reproduction status in the tribe (and virgin genuises like Newton never really stopped growing intellectually, along with other comparable groups like monks). Children with early sexuality never catch up mentally either, for this reason. The window of opportunity is lost, it’s like trying to feed plant nutrients into a fruit that’s already been plucked. Future generations will look back in horror that we force-feed ducks to make liver paste but how much more that we encourage the most depraved degeneracy in the most vulnerable – children, which stunts their life, by outcomes? And an addiction, as freeing them?
If you’re mature enough to make babies (that’s what it is) then you have no right to intrude on your own parents. Traditional societies held this rite of passage important. Men who brag about losing their virginity aren’t taught to value purity of the body and psychological pair bonds, they’re kept ignorant of these (by vindictive sluts who want to convert others to misery) and consider themselves men for performing like prostitutes (white men, how far ye have fallen) for a near-stranger who doesn’t love them enough to give them children for it (the test of female loyalty is the investment of fertility). It’s empty. They think they’re proving how they’re independent but they still exist on their parent’s health insurance or under their father’s roof, it’s objectively pathetic. I’m surprised the Boomers didn’t give them a trophy. The Manwhore Medal.
Congratulations, you’ll make an inferior husband with every notch! – Just like the divorcing Boomers.
It is not “fun”, not sport, not exercise, not “good for you”, there is no upside to promiscuity. Scientifically, legally, it’s a con. It’s a self-numbing, self-soothing habit (which unlike masturbation, promotes disease**) that makes strangers have trouble connecting or ruin their pair bonding for the eventual marriage they, again, feel entitled to.

But won’t actually get (quality or bust).

Where did all the good women go? You made them notches. The rest of the world is laughing at America bitching about the consequence of their own causes. You want a culture of sluts, now you have shit marriages. You made your bed. America was the Patient Zero of how to fuck up an amazing civilization with degeneracy in modernity (and yes while planned you went along with it for gibs). You’ve done everything wrong but refuse to reverse it, whining that The Government should “fix it” with further incursions on responsible people’s freedoms when it’s individualism that caused it and…aren’t these guys libertarians? Highlights include bitching about abortion but wanting to keep it legal in cases of premarital consenting sex and bitching about disease rates but refusing to use condoms like a grown-up.

Are you men or not? Either you’re held responsible for your actions or not.

A basic fact that’s been known for ages:

Anyone terrified by being a parent isn’t mature enough to be having sex. If the thought of being a mother or father disgusts you, you shouldn’t be using those parts like Lego bricks (the ones that don’t un-stick) because you can’t un-make a baby.

How often does it mention that? At least, not to do anything downstairs with the opposite sex because… babies happen. They can’t act shocked when the process of baby-making produces one. That is normal.

How much of an idiot do you have to be, to deposit living sperm into or close to (anal) a vagina, and be surprised when a baby comes out nine months later? If you never want kids and you don’t get the snip first, age 18, you deserve to be laughed at. Women can’t get done age 18 but men can get it easily. It’s like something out of Idiocracy to act like your fertility is a surprise, that was a main joke at the opening of the film. You can show them all the pictures but they assume their lust can temporarily suspend the laws of biology. And they treat pregnancy as a disease, like the late-term abortion monsters. (You consented to make it, that’s all sex is, sex is not an orgasm, nobody is stopping you from having those, it even happens in sleep for both sexes. I would add that the cultural focus on orgasms is intended to weaken bonds with pressure and tire people though, it isn’t the purpose and shouldn’t be a focus if you care about health.)

Expecting infertility is abnormal. Really creepy, if you think about it.
A union of death.

Sex Ed doesn’t educate at all, it misinforms.

suggest that these youth have been harmed

really?

the overt pedos saying about raping menstruating little girls are abusive?

wow, shook

and may further place themselves in harm’s way.

Self-destruction, common reaction to abuse.

People are not sex toys or ego pacifiers, whatever Sex Ed has “taught” you.

Intimacy means a lot to people who aren’t psychologically broken. It’s serious. Only a psychopath sees people as toys.

Furthermore, the profiles of adolescent females and males who report such experiences are distinct in ways that warrant their independent examination and attention.”

Different biology, different trauma. Female virginity is more complex of course, involving fertility as the carrier sex and there’s the high risk of physical permanent damage including scarring. Given that fact, the female is historically considered worse (protect the baby-carrying sex is a survival instinct, female fertility or available brides are a vital resource of a race) but men and boys merit individual study as a sex that tries to reduce their numbers (abused) and improve their life outcomes too, while acknowledging sex differences without shame. A cultural change is needed there.

No sex without (full) consent, as this shows, that’s just rape.
It ruins lives.
Strangely, it also increases race-mixing. Stress dampens the typical aversion? Or it seems riskier? This would apply to any racial dynamics, remember, so a black girl would become more likely to sleep with a Mexican, for example.

This is a major factor in suicide, unspoken.

Slutty men and women are far more likely to be acting out their abuse in a way they feel they control.

https://psychologydictionary.org/repetition-compulsion/

It is informally known as “acting out” but instead of relieving themselves of the pain, it’s a temporary purge that brings on feelings of shame and isolation, which they’re often told means they must sleep around more. By the Sex Ed groomers.

Sex is not a suitable anti-depressant. If you must, just masturbate (needing porn is a form of impotence). There’s higher esteem and satisfaction where studied anyway, don’t expect the groomers to tell you that (otherwise how could they rape their students?) … they want to convert people to their miserable lifestyle.

Emotional distance is not normal in men, nor stoicism (philosophical stoics are very close to people) but it’s a fear of emotional intimacy, especially with the demographic of their attacker/s.

*Their libido doesn’t disappear after one attack.

**The MRAs going on about male cancer studies don’t want to research how bad the habit of promiscuity is for the health of a male body because they might have their feelings hurt. They might be judged or questioned (death before triggering?)… There’s a link between anal “sex” and various cancers, for example. Fuck like a gay man, get the same disease risk profile of one. They hardly research it (fine, die?) but penile cancers etc all rise because of fecal bacteria (you know they refuse condoms, just like a homo).

And they’re the reason syphilis is back (men are the major carrier). Hope you like your dick dropping off because you’re too manly to protect it (valid Q: who would know you use condoms unless you tell them and have you seen how many male porn stars get HIV?). Antibiotics are failing on various STDs because the Government gives them all the antibiotics they want without telling them to be less of a slut in future and, being stupid, they use them wrong – directly causing resistance. 

The State shouldn’t hand them out again because hey, you can’t be trusted to use them properly and take measures to avoid infection, so eventually they will fail because of your behaviour.

Another cause of resistance is that they often have multiple STDs (and don’t tell the other party beforehand, which is rape), that swap genes. Still the State refuses to quit enabling the walking public disease cases. The rest of us suffer.

The STDs are preferentially evolving within the male system because nobody is telling the manwhores to stop. The rest of us don’t want to die on the operating table for a large garden splinter age 44.

They grow where irresponsibility lives.

Proof:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180627160523.htm
“The analysis revealed that 9 percent of gonococcal genes showed increased expression exclusively in men and included genes involved in host immune cell interactions.”
The female expression was half that. Tell the manwhores to stop (and the slutty women obviously) or the drugs will become smothered and ineffective in the human immune system (i.e. of all of us).

The “I’m not harming anyone” libertarian argument is bullshit! We have genome data!

It’s evolving around your stupidity. To kill the species.

(By infertility or direct mortality does not matter).

Statistically?

America doesn’t need a baby boom either, you need the contraction that’s happening because few of you can get married, can afford children and raise them properly plus the Baby Boomer generation was a fluke of history (and world war dead), repeating it will constrict your society and cause more Boom problems. More people, less prosperity (see India). Picture overflowing sewers. You need to be K-selected and focus on quality while reducing foreign (genetic) competition for your domestic tax base resources (your birthright). You cannot out-breed the billions of Asia and Africa and South America. America is a small country compared to most of the globe. Thankfully, you don’t have to.

And immigration doesn’t actually help, Magic Dirt doesn’t fix their tendency to over-breed.

The guys going on about the Spartans can’t sit out in the cold overnight once but never talk about the boy rape by “mentors” (it was Ancient Greece), not being able to choose who you marry (class was important) or being forbidden from living with your own wife until age 30 so… we’ll pass on that system. While making men full citizens age 30 is a good idea neurologically, for voting especially, the sexual stuff is creepy. Plus, you’d 100% be drafted. Sparta was a military force, you can’t be a Spartan male in lifestyle and not be drafted. Usually these same guys getting misty-eyed about Brotherhood (military cult dogma) also bitch about the idea they might be drafted as “sexist” – yes, but in a good way. Men evolved to fight. Men are better equipped to defend themselves. Women are needed so the nation doesn’t die biologically (whatever the outcome) and many women don’t reproduce either (social reasons) but men always fought one another as a rite of passage for a wife and few ancient men bred, your odds are better nowadays. Why complain you have an advantage (self-defense) and the state knows about it? Would you rather be a woman, and physically weaker? Are you sure?

(Physically weaker and more likely to be sexually attacked, 10% lifetime rape risk up top, great combo – there’s your ‘hate crime’).

update:

I didn’t know this existed already until I looked but fuck you America.

http://advocatesaz.org/2012/11/20/std-awareness-antibiotic-resistant-syphilis/

HOW DO YOU KEEP GETTING WORSE. HOW.

“and when the disease goes untreated, it can cause severe, possibly fatal, damage to the nervous system.”

Slutty preppers die first.

Yellow Fever goes first

https://www.mirror.co.uk/lifestyle/health/three-tourists-confirmed-first-global-12545085

What if one plague were an STD? That would really be the ideal format.*

The cuckservatives really think virtue signalling and hypocrisy will save them?

Precious.

That includes Ebola.*

And good luck marrying decades too late when you’ve made yourself infertile.
I heard from someone who worked on a syphilis ward, it became such a hazard, historically, due to the men. They’d suspect it, not get tested, leave it untreated (DIY doesn’t work) for YEARS and in the mean time, spread it.

Pure r.

I’m pretty sure all STD epidemics can be traced back to about a dozen or so manwhores.

Eventually, they’ll be prosecuted. We can track it back now by genetics.
Sterilizing someone is worse than killing them, it’s killing all their children before they’re conceived.

The kind of people who think it “doesn’t count” as rape of a child if it’s legal in the area.

The first challenger to sex positivity: Super-gonorrhea

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-36065314

Doctors have expressed “huge concern” that super-gonorrhoea has spread widely across England and to gay men.

The new superbug prompted a national alert last year when it emerged in Leeds, as one of the main treatments had become useless against it.

Public Health England acknowledges measures to contain the outbreak have been of “limited success”.

Doctors fear the sexually transmitted infection, which can cause infertility, could soon become untreatable.

Terrible news for whores.

shrug lol toldyaso fuck you bateman

The rest of us are sitting pretty.
This whole thing is priceless.

Only 34 cases have been officially confirmed in laboratory testing, but this is likely to be the tip of the iceberg of an infection that can be symptomless.

The outbreak started in straight couples, but is now being seen in gay men too.

By straight they mean swingers.

“We’ve been worried it would spread to men who have sex with men,” Peter Greenhouse, a consultant in sexual health based in Bristol, told BBC News.

“The problem is [they] tend to spread infections a lot faster simply as they change partners more quickly.”

They are also more likely to have gonorrhoea in their throats. There further resistance is more likely to develop as antibiotics get to the throat in lower doses and the area is also teeming with other bacteria that can share the resistance to drugs.

Cock-tail effect?

The bacterium that causes gonorrhoea is extremely adept at shrugging off our best antibiotics.

So two drugs – azithromycin and ceftriaxone – are used in combination.

But now resistance to azithromycin is spreading, doctors fear it is only a matter of time before ceftriaxone fails too.

Oh noes.

England’s most senior doctor has already warned gonorrhoea is on the cusp of becoming untreatable.

And Dr Gwenda Hughes, the head of the sexually transmitted infections unit at Public Health England, said: “We cannot afford to be complacent.

We?

“If strains of gonorrhoea emerge that are resistant to both azithromycin and ceftriaxone, treatment options would be limited as there is currently no new antibiotic available to treat the infection.”

Yeah, same with lots of diseases, few of which are transmitted by consensual choices.
You chose to take on the risk. Welcome to adulthood.

She is encouraging people to practise safe sex to minimise the risk of sexually transmitted infections.

I have sympathy for those who will have caught it from being cheated on, but the rest brought it on themselves. Notice how entitled they feel to treatments and R&D meds from taxpayer funding? Why should others fund your lifestyle? Why should I pay for your sex life? I wanna stay the hell out of your bedroom, like that slutty American tart instructed.

“Failure to respond appropriately will jeopardise our ability to treat gonorrhoea effectively and will lead to poorer health outcomes for individuals and society as a whole.”

Society? The promiscuous make up about 15% of the population.
The slutty people become infertile?
Isn’t this Nature’s sterilization process for bad parents?
How is this my problem?

But Mr Greenhouse warned that sexual health services were facing their “biggest restriction ever” due to funding cuts.

You wanted more people in the country, meaning you get a smaller slice of the pie (tax takings).

The emergence of a dangerous superbug was creating a “perfect storm scenario”, he said.

How. What. Why. Where. BS.

Meanwhile, the Department of Health has announced a new tool to help GPs cut the number of antibiotics they prescribe.

Omg. Punishing the rest of us, seriously?
That will kill people, they’re already under-prescribed for real diseases and over-prescribed for STDs, from political pressure. Where do you think the resistance (evolution) is coming from, this quickly and this suddenly? The bacteria swap genetic material when people bang uglies.
Promiscuity culture is killing people, wonderful….

Encourage the stupid it will make less of them

All our medical advancements are flying out the window because some people refuse to control themselves and prefer to behave like animals, on our dime.

It will allow practices to see how their antibiotic prescribing habits compare with other practices.

Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said: “I want to see antibiotics being prescribed only when necessary and hope this will be a new weapon to help GPs cut the numbers of antibiotics needlessly being given out.”

Necessary?
Let me guess, the sluts are necessary, little kids with strep throat will be told to deal.
Do they remember reading about what life was like before antibiotics? Infant mortality? Death in childbirth? Industrial workers picking things up from the factory floor?

The Bible warned about the connection between immorality and plagues.
We were warned.

Tetracyclines can cause mitochondria dysfunction

http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/42414/title/Widely-Used-Antibiotics-Affect-Mitochondria/

Let’s keep putting them in food, what’s the worst that could happen?

the tetracycline class of antibiotics, which target mitochondrial translation, led to an imbalance between mitochondrial and nuclear protein translation in both worms and mammalian cell lines. Expanding on this observation, the researchers have now shown that even low concentrations of tetracyclines can inhibit mitochondrial function and lead to changes in both mitochondrial and nuclear protein expression. Across four commonly used human cell lines, as little as 1 microgram of the drug per milliliter resulted in a decrease in cellular respiration, signaling impaired mitochondrial activity….

Further, genome-wide expression data showed global repression of mitochondrial protein synthesis in the presence of the tetracycline doxycycline.

http://www.surgeryencyclopedia.com/St-Wr/Tetracyclines.html

Tetracyclines are called “broad-spectrum” antibiotics, because they can be used to treat a wide variety of infections. Physicians may prescribe these drugs to treat eye infections, pneumonia, gonorrhea, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, urinary tract infections, Lyme disease, and other infections caused by bacteria.

Yeah, that might be why antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea exists.

…Since tetracyclines glow under ultraviolet light, this absorption helps the surgeon distinguish the living bone from the dead tissue that must be removed…..

and there’s that.

These are not to be confused the antidepressant tetracyclics. Organic chemistry thing.

Sewage treatment is a big contributor to antibiotic resistance

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-07-sewage-treatment-contributes-antibiotic-resistance.html

Love the subtitle Ticking Timebomb /sarc, it ends;

‘We’re on the brink of Armageddon and this is just contributing to it,’ Wellington says. ‘Antibiotics could just stop working and we could all be colonised by .’

Ask places like population-dense (~1b) India why they aren’t storing their antibiotic medicines properly (a direct cause of growing resistance) with all that foreign aid money, but funding a space program.

Also, ponder the impact of allowing third-world immigrants into first-world countries, carrying in their colons (to be released into the sewerage system periodically) the worst bacteria cultures in the history of the world. Drink up that tapwater!

First antibiotic resistant bacteria found in food

coverage here

In squid.

“Most governmental programs geared to examining food products for safety, only look for the usual suspects, E. coli, Listeria, etc. If relatively harmless resistant bacteria are in the food chain, it’s only a matter of time, the researchers note, before harmful types of bacteria that can cause serious problems develop the same resistance, leaving physicians with no options to treat victims. A chilling announcement if ever there was one.”

Microbes are more interesting than people, to people

from an Oxford geneticist, good-good;

Human genetics is microbial genomics

“Never mind about sequencing your own genome. Only 10% of cells on your “human” body are human anyway, the rest are microbial. And their genomes are far more interesting.

For one thing, there’s a whole ecosystem out there, made up of many species. Typically a person harbours 1,000 or more different species in their gut alone. For another, a person’s health is to a large part determined by the microbes that live on their body, whether that be as part of a long-term commensal relationship or an acute pathogenic interaction.

With 20% of the world’s deaths still attributable to infectious disease, the re-emergence of ancient pathogens driven by ever-increasing antibiotic resistance, and the UK’s 100K Genome Project– many of which will have to be genomes from patients (i.e. microbes) rather than patients’ own genomes given its budget – pathogen genomics is very much at the top of the agenda.

So what do pathogen genomes have to tell us?

  • Transmission. British researchers have been leading the use of genomics for routine “microbial forensics” in the NHS. Pioneering studies in Oxford and Cambridge focusing on the hospital-associated pathogens Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile have demonstrated how real-time genomics will revolutionize medical microbiology by detecting outbreaks as they occur.
  • Antibiotic resistance. Individual patients will benefit from pathogen genomics through accurate prediction of antibiotic resistance profiles. Already whole-genome sequencing outcompetes conventional techniques in speed and cost for some pathogens. High accuracy has been demonstrated in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, pathogens in which the recent rise of antibiotic resistance has been particularly alarming.
  • Within-host evolution. For the first time genomics has detailed the microevolution of bacteria within the human body, revealing parallel evolution across patients in an outbreak of Burkholderia dolosa in cystic fibrosis patients, and an excess of protein-truncating mutations associated with disease progression in chronic Staphylococcus aureus carriage, underlining the potential of the body’s natural flora to evolve and ultimately subjugate its host.
  • Disease severity. Pinpointing the genetic basis of important microbial phenotypes – principal among which being disease severity – is the next big challenge for pathogen genomics. In other words, pathogen genome-wide association studies (pathogen GWAS). While much is known about the molecular mechanisms of virulence in microbes, population-based studies that ask why some bacteria make people more sick, or sick more often, are almost entirely lacking. By distinguishing hypervirulent from avirulent strains, and unearthing new avenues for drug design, pathogen GWAS has the potential to radically impact public health policy and individual patient management.

Important obstacles still lie in the way of genome-wide association studies in pathogens, because of fundamental differences between humans and microbes in the way they reproduce and exchange genetic material. But these challenges can be overcome through a detailed understanding of microbial population structure that whole genome sequencing is giving us.

Pathogen genomics is gathering pace – in the Modernising Medical Microbiology consortium alone we have sequenced over 15,000 bacterial genomes in the last 3 years – and ambitious projects such as 100K Foodborne Pathogen Genome Project at UC Davis aim to sequence many more. With such momentum, and innovation in our methods of analysis, it is only a matter of time before we begin making giant inroads into understanding the genetic architecture of infectious disease.”

As the science of genetics progresses, it will render itself largely obsolete.
Once everything is sequenced and explained in a comprehensive database, there won’t be much to do.
It will knock out a few politically correct falsehoods in the way, though.