I thought this might be of cursory interest, considering all the discussion of Hitler/Trumpform recently.
Jung noticed this topic, too.
If you’re going to compare people to literally Hitler, perhaps you should research and educate yourself that Hitler might not have been Hitler at all.
“There is, however, a second use by Jung of this term “Jewish psychology“.
It has another implication.
Here, he is referring to systems of psychology developed by Jews such as Freud and Adler, systems that claim universal applicability and truth.
Such a psychology is a “leveling psychology” (Jung’s words), in that it undermines the idea that there are psychological differences between groups of peoples, such as nations.”
Psychology is the scientific study of differences, comparing psychometric data from the independent variable/s, it is impossible to conduct psychology as a science without that fact. Imagine a doctor who is unable to tell the well from the sick, let alone why. Science must be objective, but not universal.
Yet much of modern psychology prefers to bolster a fairytale narrative that we are all the same, the definition of anti-science when the purpose of said science is to discern distinctions, and it is unsurprising these ‘studies’ cannot be replicated.
However, in the “Erwiderung auf Dr. Bally”, Jung says: “I must confess my total inability to understand why it should be a crime to speak of Jewish psychology.”
This is quite true, in parts. It may be conspiratorial, depending on whether you believe in prophecies, demonic/spiritual influences and the like, but the painting mentioned is real and you can follow on from there.
I love telling people where to find the dark things online.
Nothing evil, but forbidden things like the Nazi discussions on otherwise social justice tumblr.