Do women just hate all men? (serious)

TLDR: Yes but also no. Yes for their actions and endorsements, not for being male. It’s more resentment than hatred. Like the hippy slutty Boomers. 7,000 words.

This is going to answer some questions I believe merit being taken seriously because it ties into biology and our future.

It is brutally honest and true, whatever any woman tells you. I have no reason to lie, remember.

I think even the MGTOW types would largely agree with this assessment because it’s rooted in Darwin. Men have all the power, women are mostly sitting there. Waiting for them.

Are the men of today equal to the WW2 generation? Yes or no?
In terms of genetic fitness, we all know the answer is no.
No, they are not.
And women definitely resent this.
All the ‘vintage’ trends aren’t just longing for the ability to wear twirly dresses and high heels without falling afoul of a rapist immigrant, they subconsciously want the genetic fitness of men back. (although women are dressing androgynous to avoid attack by immigrants too, but men refuse to admit this, instead pretending they all wanted to look asexual simultaneously by fluke)
Naturally, none of them will dare tell you this. Especially the tradgirls, so-called conservathots. Do they seem happy to you? Does a bitterness creep in, much like the sad MGTOWs? They believe they’ve made a compromise out of the measly postmodern pickings. Their husband would not be their first choice, if they could get a WW2 hero type instead. All women know this and that is why modern housewives are mocked for ‘settling’. Settling for inferior quality men, not to settle down. In surveys, such women want to get married, so it’s a quality thing. Women are the gatekeepers of genetic quality in the land, men are the protectors of the land itself, remember that. Men are in denial about the sexual selection at play amongst women. All women value men for is genetic fitness. Nobody cares about bank balance if you’re so old (paternal age) you make an autistic kid. Genetic fitness uber alles. It is the reason for both to live. It is the reason for sexual reproduction. A combination of genetic fitness. So women are effectively in an arms race to claim the best man as their provider. Sperm donor means nothing or the ghetto would be doing great.

Compare current ‘men’ to those in the 1990s, then the hippies of the 1970s, the halcyon 1950s, then the WW2 tough 1940s etc. It gets worse and worse the longer you look. Do you imagine women don’t notice?
I don’t think it’s that women hate men, per se, I think sexual selection is at play and women hate what men have become. That is the fault of men and something to place fairly at their feet. The obesity rate is much discussed but most obese people are men. They have no pregnancy excuse, no Pill, no menopause. They even tried to meme it in a fat acceptance way as Dad Bod. WTF. They’re lazy slobs who love beer and wings more than their wife. Don’t be shocked when she no longer wants to fuck you, dude. If you look like a 10 month pregnant woman, she’d have to be a secret lesbian. Do you imagine women don’t comment on these developments? Women always handle men with kid gloves because a certain proportion are insane and will snap and kill people if spoken to like fellow adults, on any topic that threatens their Hollywood-built ego (masculinity is fragile, in this era, not others). When in the bathroom, complete strangers of women will just rip into other women’s husbands, including whether he looks weak (like the weeb with a waifu that has a stronger manjaw than him, and trails along behind her like a dog) or whether he got fat (liver disease, fatty liver) and predicting how long the marriage will last while her libido is trying to make it work. Women naturally have a larger body fat percentage to be healthy (T&A) so this stigma only really goes one way, especially since men cannot get pregnant. This and many other factors, women are brutal in judging. Add in cultural alcoholism giving them impotence issues (PC term ED) and how overweight men have dick shrinkage (look it up) and higher oestrogen, and there’s much to discuss behind their back because they’re not man enough to acknowledge it themselves.

It’s like how all the ugly men rally around to call one another 7s because they have a job. That isn’t how numbers work. You’re all like 2-3s to even ask that shit, brutally. We need a hot or not for men on the 10-scale, looks-only, no hiding behind income, since they would be SHOCKED. It isn’t that women are harsh in rating men. Women are realistic. Women evolved to be, sexual selection is the women’s duty. Men are answering from sexual desperation with a slutty attiude and rank women too highly, sorry. Female simps exist (called pick-mes) but they’re far rarer than men.

So we have an embittered manchild demographic who thinks they belong on a GQ cover because they aren’t as fat as their slob friends and can tie their shoes (but don’t you draft them!), with perverse tastes refined by hardcore POV fetish porn and an ego constructed by the finest of Hollywood’s Jewish minds. So far, so repulsive. Women are sure missing out on that partay.

Then consider what separates a boy from a man. It isn’t age. It isn’t whether he ‘fucks’ (nb. violent bravado terms for anything sexual are a tell of a low quality male, who is also very, very, very bad in bed*). Hollywood lies to men and tells them women want “players” (and players share this as urban legend, despite dying alone). Women do not. In studies, women want conscientious** men for ‘long-term mate selection’, who don’t have diseases and retain the ability to pair bond. Yes, what women want in husbands, men wants in wives. Imagine that. Almost like they’re made for each other. Women swoon over Mr Darcy, they ogle James Bond***. Women would not wish to marry James Bond. Look but don’t touch. He looks diseased and …sticky.
Who wants to marry a thot?

*to speak like an edgelord 13yo past the age of like, 15.
**emotional intelligence, which correlates to IQ so is very much real
***Women sexually objectify men casually more than non-pathological men sexually objectify women, they don’t just tell them about it (verbal abuse) or act any differently (groping etc). They are just looking. This is why women love to read romances and watch entire plot lines about who is getting married. They imagine the couples. It’s the visualisation, they don’t actually want it.

Thus far? As women judging Western men? (also note how female weebs describe Asian men, reconcile with above)

So we have hypocritical sluts claiming their ‘body count’ (violent term) doesn’t count (???) while they brag about defiling the potential wives of other men or hardcore porn addict wankers – so far, so repulsive. Where is the defending Western values part? Even Christian men are whores nowadays, don’t @ me. Having a girlfriend is living in sin. Women don’t look at what you say because men are the liars of the sex*, women look at actions e.g. marriage plots in a story, not proposals.

*most liars are psychopaths and most psychopaths are men, it’s science

MOVING ON—

What distinguishes men from mere males is moral authority.
To put it bluntly, modern men have zero of it.
Not little, but zero.

Look at the average partner count for men (higher than women, most sluts are men, just with a smaller group of women), look at the race-mixing data (higher in white men than women, by far) and look at the deadbeating (almost always a man abandoning his kids, not the mother). This is maths. It is incontrovertible.Women have higher sexual disgust, when studied, than men. By a very, very long shot. As in, practically speaking, women would be happy to die alone than waste their time and risk their life investing in the genetic line of a perverse degenerate aka a man they cannot (biologically) respect. Run studies specifically, you’ll see. Would they rather die alone or have kids with a man who had 5, 50, 500 sexual partners? Second study, a man who is a ‘sex tourist’ in countries with child age of consent? How do you imagine women would assess it?

The manosphere is not redpill, they are bluepill. They twist statistics to avoid responsibility on themselves. Single mothers didn’t get themselves pregnant, lads. The manosphere is so bluepill they agree with the white genocide, they agree with the immvasion and the race-mixing. They are civnats at best who believe (like postmodernists they are) that culture is a magical spell over the magic dirt of Da West and NOT the exclusive entitled homelands of white people, and when you add in lazy shit to the village well, it’s still fine to drink from! Because they got their Chinese restaurants, herpes-spreading massage parlours and slightly cheaper nanny for their abandoned baby. Magical thinking morons. That is not a Christian society any more (if it ever was). If stripper or hooker is a possible career path in your culture for your teen daughter, it is not Christian, but Satanic. This reaction to Puritanism in America is like a pendulum swing in the process of going back and cancel culture is the transition period. Cancel culture is anti-degenerate but concealed. Soon, it will be openly. Sure, women are so jealous (/sarc) of the tragedy of the commons playing out: morally, demographically, culturally and in terms of disease. Y’all sound like Boomers who moved to Thailand to be open pedos. Multiculturalism is the enemy, not Pleasure fucking Island. If you wanna go on holiday, go. Don’t IMPORT it. If you wanna live with it, move THERE, do not force your fellows and the future of your homeland to suffer your dirty hippy xenophilia. Women see men become asses and who wants to marry an ass or a class clown? Even their married men claiming to be traditional are not putting their friends aside for their families. Marriage is a commitment.Forsaking ALL OTHERS. The biggest problem with America is this homosociality, you replaced the nuclear family for it. You are not homo married to your buddies. So that’s another arrow in the quiver of why women all secretly ‘hate’ men (but not all men) and won’t ever tell them. We have men bitter on forums at 7pm that there’s no wifey making dinner for them when they get back from work, when they’re actually seeking out the company of men online instead, for spousal emotional support. That’s faggoty. Friends are not a replacement spouse, they’re like wine uncles nagging about the Boomer ball and chain anti-nuclear family rhetoric so WTF. Who wants to marry that? It’s a support group of losers, most of the time. Shouldn’t you be with your family? Why are you here writing the same ‘articles’ for decades, blaming women for male failures in gender role instead of teaching your sons not to cuck? Btw blogger is not a job. This shit is not work. You shouldn’t get paid for this. It’s an online diary. The manosphere is functioning as a homosocial cult (excluding women to profiteer from its members, financially exploitative) so naturally women are avoiding them. They don’t functionally want a woman, they want other men. Let that sink in. That’s why Youtube hasn’t removed all sorts of angry anti-white (women) males from the platform. It’s a trap. A demographic trap. A Pied Piper of anti-white men propaganda, anti-white nuclear family, anti-patriotic and pro-foreign, convincing them to castrate themselves (cutely called the snip or in behaviour, becoming child-free meninists by choice*) before the Muslims do it. Yes, let’s sign up to breed with any male dumb enough to fall for castrating himself! Ladies, don’t crowd them! Form an orderly line!

*because nothing is more attractive than a person of EITHER sex bragging about their mental problems and sterility (which is usually actually caused by STDs, so it might be a cover story)

Seriously, as testosterone levels drop thanks to porn ejaculations (yes, production is finite in sperm too) and other bad habits, why would women want them? Do you want manjaw and fat high-T athlete shouldered women? So why are you entitled to be desired by women, despite being more woman-like yourself, including the endless nagging? Women are not responsible for the West, men are. Their gender role is moral authority in a marriage. A man invented the Pill. A male college professor in America was involved in the court case to give it to an unmarried couple. The politicians who wrote the Immigration Act were men. Yet all the manosphere does is nag women, for problems caused by men.

Rape gangs? Men.
Crime rates? Men.
Murder and terrorism? Men.
Nobody getting married and breeding? Men propose — or don’t.
Weak laws? Most judges and police are men.
Stupid hiring practices? The board is run by men.
Dodgy curriculum? Who funds and runs Marxist charities informing said teachers? Even a man founded Femen. Women see this, even if you play ignorant. Men play dumb all the time to their own responsibility, their own contribution to the Fall, the hypoagency is obscene, let alone the gaslighting about it and chickens are finally coming home to roost in a way you can no longer ignore. The manosphere is a broken record and women have long since tuned out. They never want to man up. They have retarded gender development, they have never mentally grown up and it shows. There are men who are like 40-50, grandfather age, still pondering if they’re ‘ready’ to become dad to an autist. They dawdle like women. They wouldn’t even fight off an invading force to save their own lives, so if that’s a man, we deserve whatever we get from China (who is funding the Marxist universities, btw, not da white wimmin). Personally, I hope for meteor strike.

What is the function of men?
Protector. Of his kin. Of his sired family later.

No woman can nor should try to bail men out of their gender role. You won’t give birth for us so it’s actually equal. Any man complaining women have it easy? Sign up to have a womb transplanted and give birth. No? Thought not.
Suck it up, buttercup. This is the world of your making. The Mary Whitehouse types warned you this would happen. You still mock them as jealous of you. They were Cassandra. They were correct. Nobody is jealous of degeneracy. It’s an option for everyone. Young people are rejecting it. Biology is real. Government can only coddle so long. The dam threatens to break still. Hot potato is a game only Boomers are old enough to play.

What does this male gender role mean, in practical terms?
Demographic protection.
Now, an awareness of this is present in all women. All of them. Subconsciously, women respond to the facts of white minority (there are studies about a perception of threat) and strangely dressed foreigners far more than men do. Why? Women rely on men to protect them, whether it’s 999 or whatever. The men expect another man to defend THEIR family and this extends nationally and racially. They feel no investment patriotically because the police protect them, cowards, from personal threat – temporarily.

In hindsight, replacing mob justice between families with the police was a mistake. It made men soft.

Immigrant ‘gangs’ are the new ‘police’ brewing, them genociding us. Currently they only pick off the occasional man, so cuck men let it slide. Without police protection, it’d be open season on whites and they’d suddenly care, long after women and children were targeted.

The modern man (or postmodern man) is not a man at all. He is a eunuch. So many wars were fought by his forefathers, so much blood was spilled, over thousands of years, so he could happily import invaders as ‘immigrants’ (PC term) to fill his factories (class traitor) and his bed (race traitor). You aren’t an alpha if your kids look adopted, you were genetically cucked. White genes are recessive. They are less than 50% yours, I had the term on another post ages ago, ask pol. But these are facts. If you cannot get one (1) hot woman to breed with you from your own group, that is not alpha. It’s omega. Omegas will lower their standards as much as necessary (rejected by the in-group, not all groups*) and women definitely perceive this (note the white women race mixing stats). The rest is high on copium. Look at the divorce rates of such males if you don’t believe me. Again, facts. Like their mongrel’s mental illness rates. From pol/:

*so any white woman could mix, it’s always an option, the omega option

They permit immigration, which is biologically invasion so mentally women think of them as cowards. They permit terrorism attacking their sons and rape gangs attacking their daughters, so where’s the main gender role of men? Even the police and army aren’t what they once were. Men have no function any longer. They have replaced themselves. They have cucked themselves for globalism. For the Beige People NWO OWG dream of Open Borders, whether it’s encoded in law or not. Practically, it’s the same Hippy Wet Dream. Men have abandoned their post and obviously, women hate them for this. The low trust society they chose, from fear. Continuous fear. They never correct it, many go along hoping to be killed by the invaders last. They would rather die out than be called insults by their enemies.
Imagine if any of their ancestors packed up because their enemies were trying to psych them out.
The species would’ve died long ago.

Men are the rarest thing now. Even so-called chad types (sluts aren’t the same as desirable mates but k) aren’t reproducing, which is ultimately what women want from men, so from a biological perspective it’s no wonder the birth rate is down because neither party is getting their needs met, men for emotional companionship (distracted by hook-ups) and women for protection and loyalty. Also, do men even like women any more or just want a wet hole? Hook-ups are inhumane, they treat other human beings like a sex toy, like a piece of plastic. There’s nothing to envy. It’s pathetic. Mainly they are just masturbating into these women for the approval of other weak-ego men (homosocial motives). Approval-seeking is weak. Men are supposed to validate themselves and the manosphere denies them this to sell them shitty books and ‘courses’. The slutty men are incapable of making love, whatever their claims, so goes through an endless parade of pussy (called girlfriends) because they cannot satisfy a single one of them with lovemaking, which is newsflash the only thing women want, physically. Have you met a sane woman who wanted to be fucked? Who made them that way? Damage goes both ways, and the book Hooked goes into the brain damage both sexes have from sleeping around (masturbating with other people like a psychopath would). Culture is now psychopathic, so why would women respect men? It’s a culture that hates everything women love – the nuclear family, pair bonding and commitment to one’s family. Psychopaths are statistically most sluts, psychopaths are nomads who never commit and are fond of novelty like xenophilia and they deadbeat their family, if they have one. Low IQ men (misogyny is a trait of them, as previously covered)* have been permitted by morally weak smart ones to set the standard for the mores of the West. How many college educated men used it like a free brothel, instead of finding a good wife? Why did we abolish breach of promise for cads? Society is shit because men made it like this. Women only follow where men morally or immorally lead. When has a woman ever started a moral trend? In all human history? Men establish the sexual mores, women just enforce them. There is nothing to enforce now. Look in the mirror for someone to blame, you all became the 30yo Boomer meme. You wanted a global brothel, you got it. You don’t get to fuck around like a witless farm animal then act all entitled like where da virgins at? You are neither entitled to respeK. Nor to ‘trade up’ – to which crop of pristine women? It’s the r-type dream of an untouched meadow for them to corrupt and destroy like sexual squatters. Where they exist they hide from the likes of you, you beasts who walk on two feet, claiming to be men. Rutting sluts deserve rutting sluts. R-types with r-types. K-types with K-types, you can’t change it because it’s how your brain developed. There’s a cap and you cannot go back. Virgins want other virgins, ask them and reee. Their heads explode when virgins tell them they’re disgusting. They are entitled to their own kind, with zero hypocrisy, not the slobbering gross old men who caught diseases in other countries, out-breeding. Hollywood lied to you. Again, Darcy was a virgin. (So was Jesus). Do women prefer him or the degenerate cad Mr Wickham? Which one do modern women prefer too? History will remember many modern white men as spiteful race-mixing sluts, who felt entitled to a pure, patriotic woman they never earned, after wasting decades on the Club Scene. Tragedy of the commons played out sexually. The statistics will also show this. The monomyth is about earning a woman. It isn’t about slaying a dragon, it’s overcoming your own temptation to lust. Choosing her over other women by y/our personal actions (no Muh Dick excuses). Anyone can pick a favourite dish after gorging on the whole buffet table! That’s a deadly sin. Actions speak louder than words. So many claim to be traditional but we women judge by sexual history, it cannot lie. We judge other women and also men. You risk death for the hand of the fair maiden because the wages of sin is death. Boomer Peterson won’t tell you this. It’s truth.

*they resent women because women reject them for low genetic fitness. See top of this post.

Hardcore HD pornography has ruined the West and pair bonding. It goes both ways. Both men and women are lesser quality. It’s just that women have the choice, to invest in the genetics of men or not.
And they are logically concluding not.
Why breed with the weak?
Why waste resources in a low trust, survival society, on cowards? They’d abandon their children, plenty already have (deadbeating) and other men have refused to hold them criminally accountable. Indeed, they blame helpless women and chldren for BEING abandoned, in the ultimate of anti-white victim blaming. It’s like saying why was your 11yo daughter wearing a mini-skirt in London around the Muslim immigrant? Crime is the fault of criminals, this is the First World and we used to have standards. Like don’t cuck for criminals. Anyone who makes excuses for rapists (a crime women consider worse than murder) is worse than serial killer simps. At least those guys are in prison. Meanwhile the manosphere accuses even virgins (child or adult) of making up a false rape accusation, which IS a spin, knowing it’s logically impossible to prove a negative re consent. AKA they hate you. They hate the West. They endorse rape. They write entire articles about rape like pedo-enablers talking about age of consent. They try to nudge the line and talk about ‘what’s rape, really?’ Like ‘what’s a minor, really?’ It’s the same Marxist moral relativism. You wonder why so many are single, or perma-divorced?
Women do not tolerate bullshit. We didn’t have these problems in an all-white (non-genocidal) safe society. The EU has admitted to this replacement agenda on their own website in the past, Hillary Clinton gleefully used the term ‘white genocide’ on TV and the manosphere still, oddly, refuses to address the Genocide Question in all but broadest brushstrokes. No actions for correction suggested. Yet more years of navel-gazing. Controlled opps.The pig pen of bitter men.
However, women are passive, so the men are stupidly taking ages to figure it out.
Women resent men for multiculturalism.
Historically, what happens after victory in every war?
A BABY BOOM.
Controlled by the women.
You cannot expect war victory spoils when you refuse to fight the war.
And invasion means war. Check the definition. It doesn’t need weapons. We’ve been at war since the first boats from Africa coming to London in the 40s (Windrush) and in America, moreso since the Immigration Act in the 60s that basically permitted long-term constant demographic invasion ever since.
You cannot expect a white society, from an increasingly non-white demographic.
You cannot expect the comforts of a high trust society, from a low-trust multiculturalism.
If the great Roman Empire can be felled by immvasion, none of the West is exempt. Where is your Coliseum? The McMansions won’t last a single century. It took Rome longer than that to decline.
So “men” cry out for general, societal respect and the women ask, why?
Because respect is earned.
It’s based on gender role. Something you do.
Men refuse to defend their country, and indeed, side with the enemies to the sons and daughters, then, much like the Marxist Boomers, wonder why they are despised by their own kin.
This has been World Civil War, for decades now. We fought two world wars so we wouldn’t have entire boats of foreigners invading. Immigration IS invasion and invasion is immigration. This is becoming blatant as the NWO types import invaders despite supposed health risks. It’s a lie, it always was. This isn’t for your safety or economy. It’s to destroy you.
Men pretend to be asleep, it’s easier. This has higher stakes than pretending you can’t use the washing machine.
If they had the will, mass deportations would largely fix this. It could be done in a year or two. If they refuse to leave peacefully, which they know they will (even if you cut off welfare, which is cucking for foreign families), then the war would go hot and men… do not care. They’d allow their baby cousin to get bent over by invaders if they could keep the fetish porn and video games.

That’s your side, guys.

When Hillary is on your side, it isn’t patriotic.
https://www.fightwhitegenocide.com/portfolios/clinton-mentions-white-genocide/

Women know this.
Women hate them for it.
Why do you think Marxist women infantilise immigrants?
They KNOW. They know it’s a war and conscious cucking may spare them, it eases cognitive dissonance as crimes rise. Because passivity is a trait of women and gamma men.
The rise in gamma men, not culled by a hot war, is the primary problem.
Subconsciously, those lefty women know the men are threats, they know the immigrant family down the road is stealing their national resources and intending to replace them by reproduction (a form of UN genocide).
They know. But what can the women do about it? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. It is NOT the female gender role. Powerlessness causes mental suppression. Did they speak of a rape culture pre-immvasion? Feminists blame weak white men for the actions of immigrants they permitted to invade. They’re right about that. The rest is window dressing.
So you get soyboys online complaining, why don’t women care about politics?
It isn’t politics you milquetoast little shits, it’s basic demographics.
Why have 2.2 kids in an area of 222 Chinese? When your taxes are funding all the latter? Check foreign aid, then come back.
Women hate race-mixing, especially white women, and they despise the idea of their children doing it the most. In a low trust society, women shut their legs to reproduction.

THE OVARIES ARE CLOSED.
CLOSED FOR BUSINESS.

Rather than mix, or force their kids to.

Women are waiting for men to man up and holding the race ransom or everyone dies out. It’s very simple. It’s a strike. It isn’t safe to have kids so they won’t. Women are not obliged, even in the Bible, to get married and have a family. That’s the somewhat secular Darwinian imperative. Jesus had no children. The baby cult is rekt.

ALL the evidence points to this hypothesis and NONE against in the entire world (nor historical examples like Rome).

They won’t tell you, men need to figure it out for themselves. It’s a FITNESS TEST.

We know this from the oxytocin and patriotism link. Happy women are more patriotic (so we know for a fact male xenophiles are depressed, whatever they claim, mixing is a mantrum, it’s sexual acting-out, it’s immature). Well, much like men refusing to sign up for a military that’s pozzed, why would women risk THEIR life in childbirth to bear the weaklings of cowards?

The planners know this. The Soros types. They know. If you make the men weak, the women DO NOT MATTER.
But I’m sure the gammas love to blame them. Isn’t it weird they, like trannies, mentally identify with women more than other men? Isn’t that perverse? Kinda deviant? Why not blame other men? Boris is right there. Trying to sign us back into the EU in all but name as a ‘green’ (anti-white, pro-China) trade agreement (EEC was).

In the late stages of Roman decline, do you imagine the wives respected their husbands? You know, the men they were forced to marry or starve? Rome fucked itself by outbreeding with its slaves, with weak genes. Do not breed with those of low genetic fitness, it’s the hard rule of Mother Nature. If you fuck around, she will fuck you up.
Women sensed a culling was in order and have refused, en masse, not to have children. Because babies get you killed in a hot war. We’ve had a cold war of immvasion across the West for decades, how much longer can it last? They say civil unrest, they say community conflict and other polite terms. From a woman’s perspective, what does that look like? It isn’t safe to settle here. Women are only wandering because men are wavering. It’s a game of chicken but either way, women win. Either men clean house and reclaim the West (purging all degeneracy, however much they like it) and everyone wholesome is happy or like Delilah the women ensure the killing blow of genetic weakness ending, in a mercy killing, so subsequent generations of white people don’t need to suffer being the trafficked slaves of the invaders (paging Rotherham, already happening) because their quisling dads were Judas tier scum and left the door open. More women want the death penalty than men – for whom?

Why does the treason continue?

Because the men have some grandiose group delusions, a different form of cultish NPC.
Sure, multiculturalism will magically fix itself! MAGICALLY. And immigrants are your friends.

They’ve all adopted the selfish Boomer attitude of ‘screw you all, I got mine’.
Do you imagine the immigrants will permit you any porn or any video games? Do you imagine they’ll let you even look at ‘their’ women without putting your eyes out?
There is no Magic Dirt. THIS GOES BOTH WAYS.
Immigrants can’t become white by colonising white countries.
And the white homelands cannot remain culturally civilized and high trust while introducing people from low IQ countries (even if the immigrants themselves are white, see Italian slums about a century ago).
Unlike the Boomers, they won’t get away with their ill-gotten gains.
In Revelations, it’s noted the sinners tried to hide from God. Why? Tower of Babel. An entire lesson in the evil and anti-Christ nature of multiculturalism. Why do they beg to be hidden?
They likely played the r-type game ‘let’s you and him fight’, which is all treason really is. It’s getting the out-group to fight your battles for you. Punching down at white women, after all the immigrant rape, and excusing it, enabling it, is about as low as it gets.
Do you expect women to have sympathy for this?

Women are letting the ship go down but you lot blew the holes in the side of the boat. Cause and effect chain of events.
If the captain won’t do his job, what do you expect us to do? Literally what, mate.

What good are men if they don’t protect their women? To paraphrase Putin. Is that a man? Do those genes deserve to continue? Call it FGTOW if you like. Either way, the ovaries are closed.
All women can do is react to the moral choices of men. The choices are immoral and ongoing so we have slim pickings in terms of options. Women endorse men with reproduction, not fucking. Rutting is for the beasts. Hollywood lies. So what does this say about women’s endorsement of the current crop of men?

The birth rate (and successful marriage rate, which causes wedded births) is a function of homogeneity in a society. Deal with it.
As you increase multiculturalism, women feel more stressed in low trust society and the cortisol makes them fat, manly, angry and unwilling to have kids. The genetic, biological cascade is CAUSED by the environment. This is basic Darwin. We adapt to our environment, for survival or thriving. Now women are in survival mode, did you expect it to be pretty? Thinner? Nicer? More nubile?
Women are like other animals with the intuition, sensing impending danger. The nesting instinct is a prepper response.
Men are playing Chicken Little while enabling their own genetic destruction. They won’t be left to sit happily in the corner once outnumbered by invaders.
They are evolutionally, fatally stupid. Women cannot save them, we are not your mother and you’re no longer a little boy.
The invaders (immigrants, whatever term) once they have the numbers, will kill him and take all his stuff.
It happened in caves and it’s already happening on the micro in schools with white minorities now.
If this is how white men die out, God says they deserve it. You’re supposed to honour thy mother and father, you needn’t like them. There is a duty to protect one’s kin and homelands – from invaders. From the Tower of Babel situation, from the multicultural trading posts of Babylon and the whoredom of Sodom.
It’s literally in the book. Solomon was literally said to have a weakness for foreign women that took him AWAY from the Lord.
The good Samaritan parable is misunderstood. You do not permit them to stay. Guest right is for a guest, that is temporary. If the guest started stealing things and leeching off them (thou shalt not steal, welfare for the out-group is anti-Christ) then the reaction would’ve been different. Sell your cloak to buy a sword. Against whom? Your kin or invaders who threaten them? Love your neighbour as yourself has direct genetic implications. Thessalonians says if a man shall not work, he should not eat. Yet do men stop welfare to people with another home? Nope. They cuck. For the dual passport holders ready to bail on us, should we ever actually need them, they cuck. They literally fund the families of the genetic out-group and bleat about it to women.
In the UK, at least, white women tend to vote Conservative. Men vote Labour, see Clause 4. Men vote for Marxism. Maybe out of stupidity that they care about ‘workers’ or a hatred of hard work (no bootstraps required). Academic Agent should do a voting pattern video (since ww2) but won’t.
Men have let down the team.
You see so many expats who can’t keep their trap shut and sounds like old hags, shrewish women. You’ll be sorry doom-monger types. This is a psyop.
Take the Black Pigeon Speaks type, that love the idea fellow white people are suffering, from bombings, from rapes, from trafficking, the gleeful ‘blackpill’ reporting any other era, any other time period would’ve correctly described as treasonous.
Men have bought into multiculturalism. Women still and have always hated one another. Sisterhood is impossible. Brotherhood is temporarily possible for the smart men to replace the dumb ones (or trusting, gullible weak ones) because men are pack hunters and are erroneously viewing the out-group as potential allies, rather than historic, genetic, permanent enemies. If I were in someone’s house at 2am, I’m not there for a kind reason. Same is true at zero hour of a country, poised for a racial pogrom. The dehumanizing stage of white people has already begun. There are no Good Ones, if immigrants hated the West so much they wouldn’t be here. It’s gaslighting and it’s working.
The relational aggression between men hasn’t evolved because air transport is so novel. Men have yet to adapt. Women had to function in large groups of hundreds in primal times so relational aggression is protective of our kin. Men do not have this. Men, especially weak ones, will try to get along. Like small fish trailing a bigger one. You see entire forums where they side with their enemies to drag down their own women. Isn’t that sickening? Oh but why oh why won’t the women risk everything for them?
Why? So they can be deadbeated? So the guy can hand her the cricket bat at 2am? So he can stand idly by and forgive the immigrant who raped his 8yo daughter and the ‘immigrant’ siblings who drove the 16yo brother to suicide with hate crime style school bullying?
Why oh why don’t white women like them?
THAT’S THE IMPORTANT QUESTION HERE. WOMEN ARE SO HUGE ON SOLIPSISM OBVIOUSLY.
Statistically, most narcissists are – nevermind. [men, it’s men]

(Blackpill Bingo Game: replace all the actions of immigrants with invader and see which fits better, they even cuck for vikings now, that’s the people who raped virginal nuns if you’ll recall).

Guess we just ‘hate’ men. Not like, foreign men, but just literally all men. That makes sense. Literally every man, regardless of conduct. Regardless of religion. Regardless of moral compass and hypocrisy in deed.
Just muh All Men.
Can’t see any reasons, can you?
No, don’t see anything wrong with their conduct – according to the Marxists. They’re perfect little multicultural cucklings, cheering on their own demographic death. Their quisling anti-white behaviour is impeccable. Indeed, stand and hold open the gates as long as the invaders have an additional hole for you to fuck, while you’re fucking over your country/men financially. Then complain about ‘immigration’, to top off the sheer arrogance of it. (Patriotism is not homoerotic, man on man action, it’s white men liking white women and not foreigners, m/f).
Why not, after all? How many immigrants has Nigel Farage imported as concubines? Why would we expect consistency from men? They’re not thinking with their big head. They’re emotional.
Brotherhood in the manosphere is just a warmed over Open Borders anyway. They are not real men and women sense this. They fail in the primary gender role of men. Their ultimate purpose for their life.
Women have never wanted to open the borders (brainwashed children repeating schoolteachers do not count and anti-fa is mostly male).

So do women hate men?
They fear foreigners because if you don’t get raped, your kids will. Or your sons will have to fight a war you refuse to, at some point.
Native men?
Only the enablers, the xenophiles and the cucks. Those are all the same group, whatever differences they pretend.
Some women may be able to lie to themselves consciously (Guardianistas) but the ovaries don’t lie.
Learn from history or be a page in it.
If the West doesn’t halt the steady stream of sewage, let alone start throwing it out, don’t blame us womenfolk when everything starts to smell like shit.
We don’t hate you, per se, we hate that you’re smelling of shit. Just stop smelling of shit. Just get rid of the shit. It isn’t fucking difficult, you evolved for it. No nagging ‘but that isn’t equal, we expect to be compensated’. Living in a high trust civilization with slender nubile wives is the compensation, you morons. It doesn’t just happen. Being respected by your society is the compensation because you earned it, idiots. And nobody gets ‘compensated’ BEFORE doing the work, socialists. You do the work, THEN compensation. The peacock shows the feathers are big and healthy, THEN he gets the peahen tail. In this game of ovarian chicken, you will lose, it’s a question of whether you kill your own kind in doing so. Will white men let their omegas take them all down, out of spite? Why not voting rights ONLY to any white man married to a white woman? No? Why ever not? That’s the only tradition. This would exclude your sterile omega cucks and CCP spies (to pull a ‘Jeremy Hunt’). Women are not obliged to breed with the weak and the treasonous. There is no other viable option to women currently.
Do women hate all men?
Kinda.
We especially hate it when they import wars they’re too cowardly to openly fight.
And that’s why everyone hates Boomers, who started the spigot of pure shit.
Only to bitch and nag and whine when their grandchildren complain about the stench.

We hate navel-gazers saying women are the problem (really it’s the Asian Question, read the Census and who votes bigger gov) and when they aren’t being openly, spitefully anti-white as your local anti-fa group (they’d fit right in), it’s the futile ‘when’s the war? talk. You’re already in it. They’ve already been turned against Their Women, which is play 1 in the book of war psyops. They refuse to acknowledge this, instead going along with anti-white propaganda, when some of it flatters them. You bitches are not Nikola Tesla, you have accomplished absolutely nothing in the easiest times to be alive ever. You aren’t even drafted, little piggy. Teen boys used to beg to be allowed to serve their country and defend their homeland below proper age. Those teen boys had more honour than you ever will. Successful people don’t insult their forefathers who bravely died for them, they don’t nag about The West (you ARE the West) to suck off the funding foreigners and they don’t degrade their own women (it’s like keying your own car). Wake up and smell the propaganda drop. It smells of invader bullshit. You all lack in masculine character. Blackpill is really just Yellowpill, the Asian supremacy cucking. The NWO plan to replace Western dominance with Eastern. They admit it. Do you imagine such corrupt societies will treat you kindly? They have an excess of men, meaning there’s no use for you. When you find yourself praising the CCP just like CNN, pause to consider whether you might’ve been tricked by anti-white propaganda. Rule one in the war book is to make the enemy hate their own kind and make them hopeless. In WW2 we dropped sexually mocking papers describing how their (enemy) women preferred foreign dick. Turn them against their own culture. It 100% fits. Why do you imagine social media keeps up those twitter accounts? Those Youtube channels? Why doesn’t it take those down? It’s Marxist in method, it’s Marxist in intent and it’s Marxist in result. Use your big brain.

Women will never forgive, let alone respect and breed at historic high-trust numbers with their men, until the safety of that high trust society is restored. That is the undeniable fact of the matter.

The ones who deny the ongoing genocide much like the Red Army rapes when it’s happening to women, boys and girls before their very eyes in highly public court cases is a great reason to hate someone. If not for treason, then for what?

You can’t spell treason without reason.

Mary Whitehouse should be patron saint of 4chan, at this point. She was right before Enoch. Nobody else foresaw drag time story hour or child strippers in gay bars dressed in drag. She did. She walked so Enoch could run.
https://www.defendevropa.com/2018/news/enoch-powell-why-they-hate-him/
Politics being downstream of culture. Times are never different, people are still shit. Now men are making the same Marxist ‘mistake’ and being anti-Enochs (for ‘diversity’). There is no blackpill, there is only yellowpill. Cuckpill. Cowardpill. You don’t get to complain about your smell, other people have been able to detect it for a while. J’accuse, Judas.

Have fun being dog dads, you fucking degenerates. [This happened in late Rome too. Ask reddit.]

Divorce RISING in Asia, achtually

TLDR: The manosphere is selling you Titanic tickets.

One of two possible explanations: the low quality males being exported there are causing it and/or degeneracy is global and cannot be blamed on the West or Western women. Pick ONE or BOTH. It cannot be statistically denied unless you a bluepill little bitch.

DO THE RESEARCH.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233709670_Divorce_Trends_in_Asia
Abstract This paper presents and discusses recent trends in divorce for countries in Asia, highlighting both wide variations in divorce patterns and recent changes in divorce trends for countries in the region. Three broad regional patterns are evident: an East Asian pattern characterised by increasing divorce rates, though there are signs of stabilisation in some countries in the last few years; an Islamic Southeast Asian pattern characterised by declining divorce rates until recently; and a South Asian pattern with relatively stable and low divorce rates.

The paper also discusses divorce in international marriages in some East Asian countries and Singapore.

so try to find the PDF for that race-mixing fun! Isn’t there a piratebay for academic papers?…

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Age-specific-divorce-rates-for-women-Singapore-1980-2009_fig3_233709670
Like the West, women under 24 most likely to divorce because their brain hasn’t finished developing yet.
So they outgrow the husband.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Crude-divorce-rates-East-Asia-and-Singapore-1976-2009_fig1_233709670
South Korea rates highest among those in chart.

NO free rides.

JSTOR of paper: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43498086?item_view=read_online

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272506770_Divorce_in_Asia
The only areas that aren’t divorcing as much are Muslim.
Good luck enjoying your sinful way of life when your kids have to put up with rape gangs.

Onto some specific countries:

It’s almost like the r-types are toxic wherever they go… it isn’t the women, it’s THEM. Sexual locust.

However, they can divorce if they’re married to a foreigner. They can also claim asylum or citizenship (green card style) by going to the embassy of the foreign spouse’s country. Does the manosphere talk about this? No. It’s a ponzi of beach, e-books and pussy. Only a few at the top can actually succeed, by profiteering off the latecomers.
Contrary to popular belief in the manosphere (read: delusion) one CAN divorce as Filipino – as long as your spouse is foreign. See:

“The Church’s strong opposition to divorce is probably the main reason why the Philippines is the only country in the world, together with the Vatican, where divorce is not legal. Except for Filipinos who are married to foreigners and seek divorce in another country, and for Muslim Filipinos who are governed by different marriage laws¹, about 95% of Filipinos need to file a nullity of marriage or an annulment² to legally terminate their marriage. However, only a small fraction resort to these remedies because, while the outcome is uncertain, costs are high (usually not less than three months of average labour earnings, and sometimes much more) and the legal procedures are long and complex. Completing a matrimonial dissolution case typically takes between six and eighteen months but the procedure can also extend over several years (Lopez, 2006).”

Sorry I understand data, I guess? My opinions are based in reality.

It’s a technicality, she may not divorce you but she will still leave you.

STARE AT THE CHART. LOOK AT IT. NOT MY OPINION.

cook the rice, pay the price

They ain’t traditional, living in sin just isn’t.
“The increase in union dissolution has been accompanied by a parallel increase in the proportion of Filipinos who live together with their partner without marrying. In the past two decades, the proportion of cohabiting Filipino women of reproductive age almost trebled, from 5.2% in 1993 to 14.5% in 2013 (Abalos 2014; PSA and ICF 2014). As cohabitation has much higher dissolution rates than formal marriage (Figure 3), the rise in cohabitation will likely lead to an increase in the proportion of Filipinos who are separated³. The rise in cohabitation may also be attributable to the country’s “marriage crisis”: cohabitation may be preferable to marriage precisely because it is relatively easier and cheaper to end.”

And over HALF of Filipino women WANT to be able to divorce the weebs:

don’t hate the messenger, hate the data

“While most Filipinos still hold conservative views about marriage and divorce, a growing segment of the population is becoming more receptive to the idea of divorce. Figure 2 shows that over the last decade the proportion of Filipinos who agreed that “Married couples who have already separated and cannot reconcile anymore should be allowed to divorce so that they can legally marry again” increased from 43% in 2005 to 60% in 2014. This growing acceptance of divorce may have contributed to reducing the stigma of being divorced or separated, particularly among women, who were, and still are, expected to make all possible efforts to keep their marriage intact.”
The Bible says to forsake a cold or abusive husband so… dunno where they get that idea.
If women are keeping the marriage together, they are de facto head of the household.

“The increasing exposure of Filipinos to the urban environment (42.4% were city dwellers in 2007 and 45.3% in 2010) has probably contributed to this growing liberal attitude towards divorce. Urbanization is commonly associated with non-traditional lifestyles and behaviors, and reduces the influence of the extended family on the decisions of young people, including mate selection. This means that children do not feel obliged (by their parents’ choice) to stay in a marriage when it has become unbearable. This constitutes a break from a still recent past when parents and other family members exerted strong pressure on couples to keep their marriage intact in order to strengthen family bonds and protect the family’s reputation.”
No comment.

Muslims are also more likely to wish to dissolve than Catholics, because legally it’s easier for them.
(see link for chart)
https://www.niussp.org/staging/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Schermata-2017-07-06-alle-15.11.09.png
So it’s nothing special inherent in a religion, it’s the laws and how easy they are.

Predictably, higher IQ (education filter) women have higher rate of divorce. Well, high IQ can see something isn’t going to work, ever. The same is true of high IQ men. I don’t know why the latter isn’t mentioned.
“Figure 3 shows the odds ratio or the relative probability of being divorced and separated among Filipino women, controlling for different factors. Highly educated Filipino women have higher odds of dissolving their union than women with lower levels of education. Higher education in the Philippines improves the economic status of women and is more likely to provide them with financial independence. Indeed, a key factor for Filipino women when they leave their husband is their ability to support themselves and their children. This sense of independence and empowerment also enables women to transcend the social stigma of being divorced or separated.”
The education doesn’t cause that, it’s the IQ filter OF education in many ways.
The ones who move West rely on the white tax welfare state to support leaving, yet another leech. Again, they’re materialistic and see white men as money banks.

“As cohabitation becomes more common and as more Filipinos come to embrace more unconventional views toward marriage and divorce, the increase in union dissolution in the Philippines is unlikely to slow down in the coming years. The continued expansion of educational opportunities for women and the growing mobility of young people to urban areas will also contribute towards the steady increase in union breakdowns among Filipinos. With the recent change in leadership in the Philippines, the political atmosphere has also become more open to laws opposed by the Catholic Church, as evidenced by the strong support for the revival of the death penalty. Despite this, the Catholic Church remains a force to be reckoned with in terms of divorce legislation in the Philippines.”
TLDR: IT WILL BE MADE LEGAL IMMINENTLY AS THE OLD GENS DIE OFF.
ONCE AGAIN, THE MANOSPHERE LIES.

My own country has sensible voiding laws so expect those to expand in Asia too. In the UK, if your spouse hid an STD (including lifelong ones like herpes) from you prior to marriage, it is grounds to have the union voided. It’s also a crime to willingly pass on diseases, aka without prior informed consent, so if they were to go more traditional, the manosphere would be fucked either way.
Especially if they relate it to the death penalty and kill the cads. They claim to want patriarchy, but they really, really don’t.

MALAYSIA
https://www.rage.com.my/divorce-on-the-rise/
“IN 2012, there were 56,760 divorces recorded in Malaysia. That’s one every 10 minutes. It’s no secret – divorce is becoming increasingly common. The numbers have doubled since 2004, and when we did a manual check at the KL Family Court (which oversees non-Muslim divorces), there was an astounding 266 divorce petitions between April 28 and May 30 – and that’s just in Kuala Lumpur!
But those numbers aren’t just made up of jaded old couples. There has been a steep rise in the number of divorce petitions being brought by young couples, according to Goh Siu Lin, a family practitioner and president of the Association of Women Lawyers. Halimatunsa’diah Abu Ahmad, a Syariah lawyer, has also observed a large number of young Muslim couples seeking divorces in court.”

You don’t see the likes of Cappy covering this data, do ya? Just like he says you must kiss the feet of every central banker and a certain religion famed for usury has nothing to do with interest payment. Follow the Pied Pipers!

“Across Asia, the stigma attached to divorce often was the single biggest barrier to getting one. In this generation, that stigma virtually does not exist.”
“In an article posted on the East Asia Forum in 2013, Professor Gavin Jones of the Asia Research Institute of the National University of Singapore, said “divorce rates throughout East and South-East Asia appear to have been generally on the rise since the 1980s, partly because the stigma attached to divorce appears to have faded.””
“For a lot of young couples today, personal happiness outweighs an unhappy marriage….”
Global narcissism. GLOBAL.
An attempted abuser story:
“His own happiness was so important to him that he wanted out because he couldn’t change his spouse to his liking,” said Halimatun.
This is why courtship is so important. YOU CANNOT CHANGE ANYONE EXCEPT YOURSELF.
And why would a woman change after she got the ring? That’s insane.
“Women now make up 57% of Malaysian graduates — they are educated, financially independent and socially empowered. They no longer have to put up with harmful relationships.
…This means we will be seeing more two-income families, with young women progressively more career-oriented. That’s the good news. The bad news is, archetypal Asian stereotypes and thinking still exist, and the notion that a woman must shoulder the burden of household chores and child care has led to many divorces, said Goh.”

UP and coming economy = destroys family.
You picked this.

“In 1940, the average age of marriage in Malaysia was 18.5, and in 1970, it was 22.3, according to a research paper by Barbara Von Elm and Charles Hirschman titled Age At First Marriage In Peninsular Malaysia. Now, according to a National Population and Family Development Board survey on trends between 2000 to 2007, the average marrying age of Malaysians appears likely to increase to 33 in 2015.”

That’s a K force, good. Fewer unwanted kids. Demographic transition at play.

“But, perhaps just as importantly, getting married later could also greatly reduce your risk of getting a divorce. Sociologist Belinda Hewitt of the University of Queensland told the Sydney Morning Herald in 2012: “Basically, if you marry under the age of 25, you have about a four times increased risk of divorce.” Hewitt’s research also indicated that each additional year’s delay in marriage age reduces the odds of marital breakdown by almost six per cent per year for men, and nine per cent per year for women.”

So women are listening to the data and waiting.

INDONESIA
https://www.ucanews.com/news/indonesia-records-sharp-rise-in-divorce-rate/90725#

“More than 1,100 divorces have been recorded each day across Indonesia in the last three years, triggered by domestic violence and financial problems, a family care association reported.

It means that before 2017 an average of 288,000 divorces were recorded every year but the figure jumped to around 421,200 annually over the past three years, the association said.”

It’s easy to tell which MGTOW are wannabe abusers, claiming domestic abuse must be fake.
“About 80 percent of cases were filed by wives who suffered domestic violence at the hands of their husbands, said Sunarti.”
And for all the damage to children when their parents are divorced, it’s nothing to the trauma of living with an abusive parent or witnessing abuse of a parent. So hush.

And the Asian women are planning on locking down a white beta when Asians reject them.
https://www.economist.com/briefing/2011/08/20/the-flight-from-marriage
“WITH her filmy polka-dot dress, huge sunglasses and career as a psychologist, Yi Zoe Hou of Taiwan might seem likely to be besieged by suitors. Yet, at 35, she is well past Taiwan’s unspoken marriage deadline. “It’s a global village,” she shrugs. “If I can’t find a Taiwanese guy that accepts my age, I can find another man somewhere else.” Maybe—but since she still wants children, Ms Hou is also wondering whether to use a sperm bank or ask a male friend to be a sperm donor. She represents a new world of family life for Asians.”

STEP RIGHT UP STEP RIGHT UP
PLAY CPN SAVE A WHORE ASIAN EDITION

notice the race-mixers are the shit tier of whatever society they’re from?

https://www.economist.com/china/2016/12/03/divorce-is-on-the-rise-in-china
A huge cause is adultery. If only we had a Biblical solution to that. You cannot enforce half the Bible. It’s either sanctity of marriage or sanctity of mistresses. Pick ONE.

According to this, the weebs should be going to South America, but we know they just want a woman who looks like a little kid, so fuck data.
https://www.unifiedlawyers.com.au/blog/global-divorce-rates-statistics/
Marrying a Christian also means nothing, especially if one isn’t strong in the faith oneself. You don’t get a decrease marrying a Christian unless you also have always been a Christian. Recent converts, especially deceptive ones who feel entitled to ‘trade up’ to the church virgin after picking up STDs for years with no remorse, are like trannies in all their red flag glory. It’s the comparable gender equivalent. Sneaky fucker strategy in evolution, same thing. Your divorce risk will always be high if you’ve been to Pleasure Island, because of YOU. They act like female virginity can wash away all their sins, including divorce risk. Nope. If anything, the virgin wife would hold you to higher standards, including no porn or other cheating – causing divorce. I’d like to see that data. Do those waiting for marriage have higher standards to REMAIN married? I’ve seen so. Anyway, virgins want another virgin, not a used up manwhore (or ho). Nobody waits for a slut – who couldn’t wait for you. This PC idea you cannot help falling for someone is bull. Lust is not love.

Most common reasons include incompatibility (why did you date them?), infidelity (sue), addiction (sue) and abuse (again, sue them too).
“To get a divorce in the UK, you need to be married at least a year and prove to the court that your marriage has broken down due to one of the following reasons:”
True but you can void it if they had an STD and didn’t openly (i.e. not jokingly) disclose it before the signature.
https://www.gov.uk/how-to-annul-marriage
“the other person had a sexually transmitted disease (STD) when you got married”
just ONE

that’s the real reason the PUAs hate England
it’s legally tricky to be a slut here, from street harassment laws to passing on STD laws

CCP panic
https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Caixin/How-Chinese-fell-out-of-love-with-marriage
“Then there is the age factor. Chinese are increasingly getting married later. The largest age group of people getting married in China is now 25-29, compared with 20-24 in the past, while the number of people over the age of 40 registering for marriage has risen sharply.”
W-w-who will pay for the Boomers?
Themselves. BOOTSTRAPS.
“Most parts of China have witnessed a declining marriage rate since 2013. Generally, there is a negative correlation between a region’s growth in gross domestic product and marriage rates.”
The (((economists))) don’t say that.
“China’s housing prices have been rising sharply since 1998, stressing newlyweds and their parents. Between 2004 and 2018, the outstanding value of individual housing loans increased sixteenfold from 1.6 trillion yuan to 25.8 trillion yuan. In 2018, these mortgages accounted for 54% of residents’ total loans.”
Boomer housing bubble strikes again!
Kinda like Marxism doesn’t work? Nah, get banks to dole out eternal loans.
“In 1982, there were 107.6 boys born for every 100 girls. The figure rose to 110 in 1990, and to118 in 2000. It has since exceeded 120.”
When I say they will eventually ban race-mixing, I am not kidding. And where China goes, the rest of Asia soon follows. They will protect their men and their women from foreign conquest. And they’ll be righteous in doing so. Sexual predation is wrong. Poaching from foreign races is degenerate. Mark my words, they WILL bring in laws to retain their women.
“There is a growing trend of people getting married and having children later in life, which has created to growing senior-care burden that could become a serious drag on the country’s economy.”
K-selection, meet Marxism.
The Boomers could always… get a job?
“China should take measures to help people who cannot afford to get married and raise children. The government should introduce a comprehensive package of pro-family measures, covering housing, education and health care.”
OH YES, THE PROBLEMS CAUSED BY A MARXIST GOVERNMENT… CAN BE SOLVED, WITH MORE MARXIST GOVERNMENT!
BRILLIANT JENKINS!

and Asian Millennials are divorcing like Boomers.

Due to economic boom.

The Boomer housing bubble MUST pop. This is not a purely Western problem.

Reminders of treason for false believers

Treason alongside other unclean-ness can be financial as well as sexual and cultural (xenophilia).

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Seduction

“My son, if sinners entice you, Do not consent.” Prov 1:10

To deliver you from the strange woman, – Prov 2 (synonym: foreign)

But because of immoralities, each man is to have his own wife, and each woman is to have her own husband. The husband must fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband. – 1 Cor 7:2-3

But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, – 1 Timothy 4:1 anti-natalism is the Satanic principle of their religion.

They are cowards who fear an actual Biblical society for men:
“”If a man seduces a virgin who is not engaged, and lies with her, he must pay a dowry for her to be his wife. “If her father absolutely refuses to give her to him, he shall pay money equal to the dowry for virgins.” – Exodus, Yes you need to pay the woman, you took something from her. Sex is physical, including rape. It is a theft. To act like sex is nothing (fun is an innocent thing for children, not a synonym for vice) or a mere form of exercise is Satanic. Man is not a rutting beast. Muh dick logic doesn’t fly.

“If there is a girl who is a virgin engaged to a man, and another man finds her in the city and lies with her, then you shall bring them both out to the gate of that city and you shall stone them to death; the girl, because she did not cry out in the city, and the man, because he has violated his neighbor’s wife. Thus you shall purge the evil from among you. “But if in the field the man finds the girl who is engaged, and the man forces her and lies with her, then only the man who lies with her shall die” – Deut 22 #MeToo is ironically Biblical. We should hold sexual terrorists accountable.
PUAs strangely silent on this one. God forbid we hold men accountable for what they do with their body. There are no second chances to rape in a Christian patriarchy. As it should be.

Seduction is made plain as evil: https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/2-Samuel/13
and still on America’s legal books from a better time.

“11 But as soon as she brought them near him to eat, he overpowered her and told her, “Come here and have sex with me, my sister!”” When refused:

“14 But he refused to listen to her, and because he was stronger than she was, he raped her.”

But sure, blame women. And this causes the weakness in low IQ men called misogyny:

“15 After this, Amnon hated Tamar with such intensity that the hatred he hated her with was greater than the love he had loved her with. “Get out of here!” he said.”

Then we get the gaslighting instead of a trial.

“20 Later, her brother Absalom asked her, “Has Amnon, that brother of yours, raped you? Then keep quiet about your half-brother for now, my sister. Stop taking this so personally.” From that time on, Tamar lived in continuous desolation within her brother Absalom’s house.”

28 Then Absalom instructed his young men, “Please keep watching Amnon until he’s drunk. Then I’ll tell you, “Attack Amnon!’ As soon as I do, kill him and don’t be afraid! You have your orders, so be strong and brave!”

Yet they complain women aren’t held responsible… projection. Fish rot from the head, societies are ruined by weak men.

29 So Absalom’s young men did to Amnon just as Absalom had commanded. Then all the rest of the king’s sons got up, and each fled on his mule.

Men have been dodging holding one another responsible for rape for eons. If you permit rapists to attack your women, God will kill you all off and you’ll deserve it. So you see, the West mostly deserves to die. According to this lesson in the Bible, at least. You should kill them and let God sort them out.

38 After fleeing to Geshur, Absalom remained there for three years.

(David went soft during this time).

What do you expect from an adulterer? This is why the rule of men has failed, none of them punished one another. The Bro code is multicultural hypoagency, overtly anti-God.

16 So the king left, taking his entire household with him except for ten mistresses, who were to keep the palace in order. – 2 Sam 15

21 Ahithophel responded, “Go inside and have sex with your father’s mistresses, whom he left to keep the palace in order. Then everyone in Israel will hear how your father has come to hate you and everyone who has joined you will be emboldened to act.” – 2 Sam 16 that’s called rape actually

Men writing one another blank cheques to be whores is nothing new. That is why women loathe modern men, they earned it. Sexual disgust is based on actions, not chromosomes. What such men merit respect? None. Where is their conscience?

Fornication/rape of ten women because rape of one is also a sin? As Carlin said, fucking for virginity? Men are illogical. This is why humans mostly deserve Hell. The double standards. Nobody is exempt. That’s why it’s a standard.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/2-Samuel/18

or King David could’ve practised the Word of God and just killed the rapist like a real man. You shouldn’t have raised a rapist. You deserve to grieve the rapist you made. This could have all been avoided if your sons weren’t whores.

18:14 “There’s no reason to wait for you!” Joab retorted. Then he took three spears in his hand and stabbed Absalom in the heart while he was still alive, dangling from the branches of the oak tree.

The wages of sin.

Absalom should’ve done his duty and avenged Tamar instead of banishing her and telling her to get over it. But muh bro code got them all killed.

2 Sam 19:4 Meanwhile, the king veiled his face and kept on crying loudly, “My son Absalom! Absalom my son, my son!”

What about Tamar???

You raised two rapists while whoring around yourself. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

Solomon, who consorted with demons, also bedded them in possession of foreign women.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/1-Kings/11/1

“Now King Solomon loved many foreign women along with the daughter of Pharaoh: Moabite, Ammonite, Edomite, Sidonian, and Hittite women,”

The reason the Bible warns of the danger of seductive women.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/Proverbs/7/5

“From the foreigner who flatters with her words.”

God made you what you are, do not trespass those bounds.

https://www.learnreligions.com/woman-at-the-well-700205

“During his encounter with the woman at the well, Jesus broke three Jewish customs. First, he spoke to her despite the fact that she was a woman. Second, she was a Samaritan woman, and the Jews traditionally despised Samaritans. For centuries Jews and Samaritans had rejected each other. And, third, he asked her to get him a drink of water, although using her cup or jar would have made him ceremonially unclean.

…To fully grasp the story of the woman at the well, it’s important to understand who the Samaritans were–a mixed-race people, who had intermarried with the Assyrians centuries before. They were hated by the Jews because of this cultural mixing and because they had their own version of the Bible and their own temple on Mount Gerizim.”

Sixth Commandment is a command to keep God’s designed bloodlines clean. This is also a Jewish principle and explains their success neatly versus mixed, mongrelized populations. Inbreeding < Outbreeding.

https://bible.org/seriespage/3-can-we-believe-immortality

When we approach the Bible on the subject of immortality, it is well to have in mind a few important facts that are basic and necessary to a proper understanding of the subject. Nowhere in the Bible is the expression to be found, “the immortality of the soul.” Nor is there written anything about “the immortal soul.” We are not suggesting for a moment that Scripture teaches anything about the sleep or annihilation of the soul at death. The thought of the soul’s endless being is true enough, but it is not Scriptural language to refer to “the immortality of the soul.” The Word of God assumes the eternal existence of every soul regardless of its destiny. Every man’s soul is immortal and can never be annihilated. Jesus said: “Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul; but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in Hell” (Matthew 10:28).

Now those who teach “soul-sleep” would have us believe that their doctrine is Biblical, when actually they have falsified the facts by their misinterpretation of Scripture. Man can kill the body, but that is the worst he can do. God alone can take hold of both body and soul and condemn them.

It is true we read: “The soul that sinneth, it shall die” (Ezekiel 18:4),

but neither here nor elsewhere in Scripture does a reference to the soul dying mean a state of non-existence, or even one of unconsciousness. The Bible teaches that there are three kinds of death and it distinguishes clearly between each. First, there is physical death, or the separation of the soul from the body. This is the death of the body to which reference was made in Hebrews 9:27, “It is appointed unto men once to die.” Second, the Bible teaches that there is a spiritual death. This is the separator of the soul from God, the condition of all unbelievers of whom Paul says they are “dead in trespasses and sins” (Ephesians 2:1), and “alienated* from the life of God” (Ephesians 4:18). Third, there is eternal death or banishment from God. All who suffer eternal death are conscious, but “shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord” (2 Thessalonians 1:9), these “have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone, which is the second death” (Revelation 21:8).

*the Other, the out-group

nb. Adam chose to eat of the tree, despite a direct warning from God. Nobody mentions this.

“In ADAM all die” – 1 Cor 15:22 so the PUA types blaming Eve/women are literally giving you false words, Adding to the Word.
You follow false prophets, anti-natal monsters.
You follow dead men in how to live your barren life. “A man who finds a wife finds a good thing”, “more precious than rubies” and “love her because she is a woman”.

They believe the lies of the mixed population (including certain bloggers), who project their unclean status onto the West and its men and women. Then be gone from us and go back from whence you came. We never wanted you here.

“For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive” (1 Corinthians 15:22).

The evangelical arrogance of Americans is to think proclaiming yourself a Christian makes you so. A corpse identifying as dead is not made living. You will only know if you’re going to Hell when you die. Vanity does nothing. Their belief is easy to question, since they preach against the Bible per se. The door of death will be closed to them. The Afterlife does not exist for all or even most people (the way is narrow). They deny this. They deny God.
Preaching one thing with your words (HYPOCRITE) and another with your actions (endorsing anti-natal, Molechian practice) is not Christian. 1 Peter 4:15 “busybody in other people’s matters” – influencer.
https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Minding-Your-Own-Business
There is no rest for the wicked, they must constantly corrupt others and finally destroy themselves.

FI

Humans don’t say ‘you broke my brain’ we say ‘you broke my heart’. The heart stores the soul and its memories. The heart and brain both cannot regenerate in humans. Once damaged, medical science gives you a short timer. So this era is interesting in the biggest COD being heart disease. A reprobate mind/heart?

Explains the Asian fitness influencer rise (Asian body fat)

TLDR Asians carry more fat than whites (in America, at least).

https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/72/3/694/4729363
Well yeah, the junk food and spices diet is hell on the hormones too. They evolved for multiple famines (especially the Chinese and Indians) so they tend to weight-gain like that, too. Fat deposition isn’t the same between race (black thighs/’ass’) so why would accumulation patterns and proclivity to gain work like that either?

Results: A convenient sample of 1626 adults with BMIs ≤35 was evaluated. Independent percentage body fat predictor variables in multiple regression models included 1/BMI, sex, age, and ethnic group (R values from 0.74 to 0.92 and SEEs from 2.8 to 5.4% fat). The prediction formulas were then used to prepare provisional healthy percentage body fat ranges based on published BMI limits for underweight (<18.5), overweight (≥25), and obesity (≥30).

Conclusion: This proposed approach and initial findings provide the groundwork and stimulus for establishing international healthy body fat ranges.

But they’re not the same. Bio-logically.

 

The Asian ‘gym girls’ also trying to pass off the manjaw as ‘gains’ by matching on the stomach and thighs, I’ve seen white lawyer types do the same. Do NOT fall for it, men. If the jaw is square and broad as a child and pre-teen, RUN.


The small, squat (squarish) skeleton and pedomorphic features of the Asian race (historically, accurately called Mongoloid if you can search for it in anthropology) already pre-dispose their young people (teens) to lower BMI anyway, so the ‘losing weight’ excuse is bullshit, they’re building muscle to match the jaw and trap some sucker with their high T and bad temper. This lower BMI is not a consequence of health (dietary or genetic) so compared to the unhealthiest white people EVER (sorry America) they still have higher BMIs. HOW.

White women have a naturally high BMI (taller, curves) so it’s actually worse than it looks. The effect is maintained in every age group, how can one fuck up age 20? Any 20yo complaining about their metabolism needs a slap.
The fat Asian hypothesis also holds true within the race, compared the Asian men to women matching age.


IF ONLY THE MANOSPHERE ACTUALLY READ THE DATA.
Every other claim about Asians it’s like [citation needed] yet when I go to look…. they lied.
I expected the one claim the weebs consistently made about Asians in America (being thin) must be true but … no.

18.5 is a terrible BMI cut-off because it includes anorexics, smokers, druggies and petite women all in one. Women look wildly different at low and too-low body fats, which also varies by race. At the same BMI, Asians look more husky because the skeleton is squared-off. They’re also likelier to lay down fat than muscle.

The Asians are larger than white women pre-menopause, what EXCUSE is there?
The only time whites actually have slightly higher BMIs (ever so slightly) is in the elderly range (60-79, at which point yeah you’re excused, you can go).
I’m seeing through the model minority propaganda and there’s nothing to it.
Rule #1 of moving to America – DON’T GET FAT. YOU HAD ONE JOB.

“In contrast, models for Asians predicted a different percentage body fat from that predicted for African Americans and whites. “

That’s code for ‘they evolved so much for famine that we had to invent new maths to count it’.

“For example, Deurenberg et al (35) found that American blacks had a 1.3-unit lower and Polynesians a 4.5-unit higher BMI than whites with the same body fatness (35). Even within the white cohort, the investigators observed small differences between Americans and Europeans.”

Asian placement is denser. Squat Mongoloid skeleton, anthropologically. If you disagree, it’s cope.

Americans are mixed white, generally, that’s why. German/French hybrids and other nonsense. You lose adaptive advantage from your subrace too.

They studied one of the thinnest types of Asians (japs) so I guarantee you others would be worse.

“The underlying causes of ethnic variation in relations between BMI and percentage body fat are likely due to small between-center body fat measurement differences and biological between-group differences (35).”

“The evaluation of Asians was confined to Japan and that of African Americans to the United States. Therefore, the underlying causes of observed ethnic differences in terms of measurement, environmental, and genetic factors are difficult to ascertain. Nevertheless, it appears evident that a single set of universal percentage body fat ranges cannot be easily developed without considerable additional analysis of this problem. Our equations and associated tables provide several ethnic-specific ranges as working guidelines. Because African Americans and whites differed only slightly in percentage body fat (by 1–2%) after BMI was first controlled for, we presented a combined equation (Equation 5) and table (Table 4) based on 4C percentage body fat for these 2 groups.”

That’s right, our fat deposition is more alike blacks than Asians. That’s how different the races are.

In a study surprising no one, high BMI also predicts depression.
http://www.psypost.org/2018/01/study-finds-high-body-mass-index-predicts-increases-depressive-symptoms-50586
Because depression is caused by INFLAMMATION, it’s an inflammatory condition!
The visceral fat is causing it, not the subcutaneous (which you need to live and is important for a woman’s hormones, gym girls are a mess).
So the #fitspo girls eating junk are STILL ‘depressed’ and on SSRIs.

So pleasant waifu disposition goes out the window.

Why bother?

For further proof of the famine-evolved rice farmer genes.
https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/93/5/1168S/4597892

Background: Asians who have a healthy body mass index (BMI) range have been observed to have higher levels of obesity and risk of cardiovascular disease than whites, which suggests that the relation between BMI and adiposity may be different for Asians.

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the influence of childhood and adolescent exposure to a westernized environment on the relation between BMI and percentage body fat in young Asian American women.

So no, this isn’t their age. No cope here son.

Design: Secondary data from 129 Asian women, aged 20–25 y, with variable lengths of residence in the United States and 327 white women of comparable ages who had participated in the Latina and Asian Bone Health Study (1999–2000) and the Berkeley Bone Health Study (1998–2000), respectively, were analyzed by using multiple linear regression with percentage body fat as the outcome variable and place of birth, ethnicity, length of US residency, and BMI as predictor variables.

Results: Asians who lived in the United States <12 y showed the same relation between BMI and percentage body fat as did whites. In contrast, Asians who had lived in the United States ≥12 y had higher percentage body fat than did whites for BMIs (in kg/m2) <20.5 and lower percentage body fat for BMIs in the overweight and obese range.

Responding to the same stimuli wildly differently > genetic!

They’re more likely skinny-fat, aka fatal fat.

Whites evolved to eat Roman grains like processed wheat.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that childhood environments may influence the relation between BMI and adiposity. Research is warranted on the role that childhood environments play in the accumulation and distribution of body fat and hence metabolic disease risk later in life.

There’s still a huge difference in the same environment.

Asians with more years in the United States had higher mean percentage body fat than did whites at low BMIs and lower mean percentage body fat at high BMIs with the regression lines intersecting at BMI ≈20.5 and body fat of 26.5%.

THANK YOU.

Again, Magic Dirt isn’t real. Enjoy your BBW Ting Tong for your golden years.

We are supremely jealous.

Asian-immigrant adults who were living in North America were observed to have higher adiposity levels

translation: chunkier

at the same BMI level than did whites (6). However, most of the Asian-immigrant adults studied were raised outside of North America. To our knowledge, our study was among the first studies to observe a difference in how BMI relates to percentage body fat between Asian Americans who had spent more years of childhood in the United States compared with Asian Americans who were minimally exposed to the United States during childhood and adolescence.

Lesson for weebs – do NOT move the Thai bride to America.

Stay in Asia or do NOT bother. She WILL get fat. You have been warned.

American-born Asians had a higher percentage of mothers with college degrees (59% of mothers compared with 37% of mothers in foreign-born Asians and 32% of mothers in whites).

Fat SJWs, great catch!

in our study, which suggested that obesity rates in our sample of Asians were likely lower than in the general population.

They admit it.

Is the general observation that, at the same BMI level, Asians have higher total body fat and visceral fat and higher risk of cardiovascular disease risk than do whites applicable to Asians in general,

yes

or is this observation applicable only to Asians living in Asian societies? If the latter, does the environment during early life influence how body fat accumulates and distributes and, therefore, affects the relation between BMI and body fat? How strong a predictor of child growth and body composition is socioeconomic background and, in particular, the mother’s education? Are our findings also applicable to men?

We concluded that the early life environment may influence the relation between BMI and adiposity in later life. In particular, we speculated that Asian women substantially exposed to the American environment early in life exhibited different patterns of accumulation of body fat than did Asian women raised in Asia;

non-sig, see above

these differences may be partially attributable to environmental and lifestyle factors that affected diet and physical activity. For example, compared with Asian children raised in the United States, children who live in Asia tend to spend more time studying, whether in school or at home, and less time doing sports and engaging in recreational activities (25). In the past, diets of Asians raised in Asia also tended to be different, with a lower consumption of breakfast cereals, dairy products, and processed meats, than diets of Asians raised in the United States (26).

Yes, they do try to eat white. Silly Asians, didn’t evolve for dairy.

So your grandkids will definitely be fat, even if she isn’t by some fluke? Great, very likely to pass on your genome.

What a waste of time and resources.

However, with the rapid changes that have been taking place in Asian economies and the globalization of the food supply, we expect to see further changes in the diets of children in Asia (27) and, consequently, in body composition.

The understanding of how childhood environments influence the relation between BMI and percentage body fat has implications for the use of BMI as a screening indicator for obesity and obesity-related conditions. In addition, research to understand the influence of environmental factors on the accumulation and distribution of total body fat and metabolically active visceral fat during critical life stages will add insight into the use of clinically relevant screening tools for chronic disease risk.

Plan on growing old together, spending a loooong time with fatass.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25294681/

In this observational study with a short follow-up of elderly Asian people, higher amounts of visceral fat, a marker for central obesity, were associated with decreased all-cause mortality.

South Asian v White men

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1950568/

Objective

South Asians are susceptible to insulin resistance even without obesity. We examined the characteristics of body fat content, distribution and function in South Asian men and their relationships to insulin resistance compared to Caucasians.

so no, you can’t tell by ‘looking at her’, your norms are informed by white women

Research Design and Methods

Twenty-nine South Asian and 18 Caucasian non-diabetic men (age 27±3 and 27±3 years, respectively) underwent euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp for insulin sensitivity, underwater weighing for total body fat, MRI of entire abdomen for intraperitoneal (IP) and subcutaneous abdominal (SA) fat and biopsy of SA fat for adipocyte size.

Results

Compared to Caucasians, in spite of similar BMI, South Asians had higher total body fat (22±6 and 15±4% of body weight; p-value<0.0001), higher SA fat (3.5±1.9 and 2.2±1.3 kg, respectively; p-value = 0.004), but no differences in IP fat (1.0±0.5 and 1.0±0.7 kg, respectively; p-value = 0.4). SA adipocyte cell size was significantly higher in South Asians (3491±1393 and 1648±864 µm2; p-value = 0.0001) and was inversely correlated with both glucose disposal rate (r-value = −0.57; p-value = 0.0008) and plasma adiponectin concentrations (r-value = −0.71; p-value<0.0001). Adipocyte size differences persisted even when SA was matched between South Asians and Caucasians.

Marry those genes, go ahead.

Conclusions

Insulin resistance in young South Asian men can be observed even without increase in IP fat mass and is related to large SA adipocytes size. Hence ethnic excess in insulin resistance in South Asians appears to be related more to excess truncal fat and dysfunctional adipose tissue than to excess visceral fat.

in the men

harsh to call a racial adaptation to famine ‘dysfunctional’

Claimed Chinese IQ and culturally accepted cheating

Linking because: Please stop cucking for the Jews of Asia when you don’t understand the data.

103 isn’t even high, it’s within chance (5% alpha so 5 points) aka a fluke above the Western norm.

Chinese IQ, Cheating, Immigrant Hyper-Selectivity and East Asian “Genetic Superiority”

The East Asian race has been held up as what a high “IQ” population can do and, along with the correlation between IQ and standardized testing, “HBDers” claim that this is proof that East Asians are more “intelligent” than Europeans and Africans. Lynn (2006: 114) states that the average IQ of China is 103. There are many problems with such a claim, though. Not least because of the many reports of Chinese cheating on standardized tests. East Asians are claimed to be “genetically superior” to other races as regards IQ, but this claim fails.

They test urbanites preferentially, not the rural mass. They rig it, basically.

https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/chinas-rural-kids-have-lower-iqs-study

Caixin did not give the IQ scores for children residing in the rural areas covered, but quoted Mr Rozelle, who said that the average IQ scores for these age groups should range between 90 and 109.

Take the data yourself, they’re glorified rice farmers who enslave their kids. We surpassed that a century ago.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886918303301

The IQ of the samples increased by 15.0 IQ points a decade over 18-year period.

Yeah that sounds physically possible.

So almost two SD for the whole group over a generation? And we cannot replicate that here HOW?

Data are reported for intelligence of children in China assessed by the Combined Raven’s Test in 1988, 1996 and 2006. The IQ of the samples increased by 15.0 IQ points over 18-year period. The British IQ of China in 1988 and 2006 is estimated as 94.8 and 109.8, respectively.

People can think I’m a bitch about this but I’m a bitch who reads the data first and forms an opinion later.

From search engine result on the paper:

Remember national IQ predicts GDP so it’s important for foreign investors, they have an interest in rigging it higher to keep the CCP going.

At a national IQ of 94?

https://www.photius.com/rankings/national_iq_scores_country_ranks.html

That would put them on par with Vietnam. Do they have a reputation for being whiz kids? The Marxists are buying a reputation, wake up. They probably have the same national IQ as Kazakhstan (94), Romania (94), Armenia (94) and various other economic shit-holes nobody ever hears about, let alone considers bright and innovative. Stop cucking for cheats, that’s all I need. Portugal scores higher at 95 and look at their economy, like Romania they’re technically white.

At 100, being overly generous, that’s a solid average compared to smart, mostly NW or West European whites (the Renaissance, and Science people), and they’d be on par with Luxembourg. 

The intelligence scores came from work carried out earlier this decade by Richard Lynn, a British psychologist, and Tatu Vanhanen, a Finnish political scientist, who analysed IQ studies from 113 countries, and from subsequent work by Jelte Wicherts, a Dutch psychologist.

They also call Italy 102 despite its economy and centuries of cultural stagnation (pdf) so calling various types of chink 105-107 in recent years only (when the Marxists got free money printer) smells suspicious. Academic fraud should be a crime with heavy prison time. There is trillions in international investment riding on this.

Lynn shouldn’t be the only guy cited yet he seems to be, just with his later studies, ignoring greater quantities of historical evidence to the contrary (also collected by him).

Since when do we only listen to ONE guy on ANY topic?

(Unless it’s evolution and Darwin, since he invented it).

More data info below, scroll if short on time.

East Asian doesn’t actually exist in genetic history, there was essentially a creation of them by multiple Empires (mostly British) and stories/studies of African inflows of mtDNA (which would explain their physical similarities e.g. broad jaw, reduced nasal bridge, recessed chin, rounded forehead).

Racial computer data by Marquardt studies’ collection:

But *pronounced fluted nostrils (*compared to body size) and broad, thick lips:

Commonly considered solely African but falsely. Asians have it too.

Photographs used by Marquardt are representative of group facial averages shown in computer model.
Source HERE.

If E Asians had such a higher IQ truly, it would be reflected in their originality and innovation e.g. genius inventors and patents.

Don’t hold your breath. IQ is one metric and only important to academia (because it can be faked).
They’re still coasting off the British Industrial Revolution.

Back to top link:

Before continuing, something must be noted about Lynn and his Chinese IQ data. Lynn ignores numerous studies on Chinese IQ—Lynn would presumably say that he wants to test those in good conditions and so disregards those parts of China with bad environmental conditions (as he did with African IQs). Here is a collection of forty studies that Lynn did not refer to—some showing that, even in regions in China with optimum living conditions, IQs below 90 are found (Qian et al, 2005). How could Lynn miss so many of these studies if he has been reading into the matter and, presumably, keeping up with the latest findings in the field? The only answer to the question is that Richard Lynn is dishonest. (I can see PumpkinPerson claiming that “Lynn is old! It’s hard to search through and read every study!” to defend this.)

Qian study embedded here (hope this works):

http://000do4q.myregisteredwp.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/1836/2016/05/china-iodine-study.pdf

title is “The effects of iodine on intelligence in children: a metaanalysis of studies conducted in China”

Although the Chinese are currently trying to stop cheating on standardized testing (even a possible seven-year prison sentence, if caught cheating, does not deter cheating), cheating on standardized tests in China and by the Chinese in America is rampant. The following is but a sample of what could be found doing a cursory search on the matter…..

In 2000, more than 2000 people protested outside of a university to protest a new law which banned cheating on tests.

When are we getting one of those?

The rift amounted to this: Metal detectors had been installed in schools to route out students carrying hearing or transmitting devices. More invigilators were hired to monitor the college entrance exam and patrol campus for people transmitting answers to students. Female students were patted down. In response, angry parents and students championed their right to cheat. Not cheating, they said, would put them at a disadvantage in a country where student cheating has become standard practice. “We want fairness. There is no fairness if you do not let us cheat,” they chanted. (Chinese students and their parents fight for the right to cheat)

Surely, with rampant cheating on standardized tests in China (and for Chinese Americans), we can’t trust the Chinese IQ numbers in light of the news that there is a culture of cheating on tests in China and in America.

Never hire them.

This has been outright stated by, for example, Lynn (1977) who prolcaims—for the Japanese—that his “findings indicate a genuine superiority of the Japanese in general intelligence.” This claim, though, is refuted by the empirical data—what explains East Asian educational achievement is not “superior genes”, but the belief that education is paramount for upward social mobility, and so, to preempt discrimination, this would then be why East Asians overperform in school (Sue and Okazaki, 1990).

They don’t believe in meritocracy, just the mobility part.

Meritocracy is a white concept. WEIRD is globally weird.

Minus Marxist so-called positive discrimination?

The success of second-generation Chinese Americans has, too, been held up as more evidence that the Chinese are ‘superior’ in their mental abilities—being deemed ‘model minorities’ in America. However, in Spain, the story is different. First- and second-generation Chinese immigrants score lower than the native Spanish population on standardized tests.

Americans: Spain is considered a shit-hole.

Findings from this study show that Chinese youth in Spain have substantially lower educational ambitions and attainment than youth from every other nationality. This is corroborated by recently published statistics which show that only 20 percent of Chinese youth are enrolled in post-compulsory secondary education, the prerequisite level of schooling for university education, compared to 40 percent of the entire adolescent population and 30 percent of the immigrant youth population in Catalonia, a major immigrant destination in Spain (Generalitat de Catalunyan, 2010).

It isn’t racist to note this, since nationality is NOT race.

US-born Chinese immigrants are shuttled toward higher education whereas in the Netherlands, the second-generation Chinese have lower educational attainment and the differences come down to national context (Noam, 2014).

nice term for child abuse (tiger mom is PR)

—in fact, the Chinese in Spain show lower educational attainment than other ethnic groups (Central Americans, Dominicans, Morrocans; Lee and Zhou, 2017: 2236) which, to Americans would be seen as a surprise.

if you’ve never worked with clingy Chinese people asking you to constantly “help” them perform basic tasks, yeah.

They stopped doing SATs here because it was showing up the thick Asians before they could cheat (to get into secondary school).

Second-generation Chinese parents match their intergenerational transmission of their ethnocultural emphasis on education to the needs of their national surroundings, which, naturally, affects their third-generation children differently. In the U.S., adaptation implies that parents accept the part of their ethnoculture that stresses educational achievement. (Noam, 2014: 53)

narcissism

Teachers even favor Asian American students, perceiving them to be brighter than other students.

In our own countries. So nurture favours them too. They still vote Left.

The fact that the term “Mongoloid idiot” was coined for those with Down syndrome because they looked Asian is very telling (see Hilliard, 2012 for discussion).

Really? I never noticed.

Is there an autism study in mongrels yet? (No, not yet).

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/05/180504082411.htm

“Researchers have found in an analysis that minorities were widely underrepreseted in autism identifications in 2014″

Even the ‘successful’ half breeds hate the “racist” white parent, fair enough.

https://half-asian.net/category/half-asian/

“So then you have millions of half-Asians that look more or less Asian, ethnically ambiguous, and are deeply ashamed of their Asian heritage, being raised by some weird, misogynistic, anti-feminist, anti-Islamic, anti-black guy, raising some half-Asian kid whose mother tells him that he or she is white and that it was a brilliant life choice to marry some racist asshole. …”

funny how the white race traitor feels entitled to racial respect from a mongrel of their making, weird assumption you’d think?

“These are the same people who go onto raise us. Hateful, bitter, racist white men – since white men love humiliating Asian men in order to increase their access to Asian women. Literally – the entire premise of WM/AW is that Asian men are not men – and we, their sons, look totally Asian.”

Cook the rice, pay the price. I’m only sad for the kid/s, they didn’t choose it.

So they’re not happy, whatever the parents claim to have planned. People shouldn’t cover for the parents. I hope the kids throw them in a home to rot.

Back to IQ.

But, the IQ-ists switched from talking about Caucasian superiority to Asian superiority right as the East began their economic boom (Liberman, 2001). The fact that there were disparate “estimates” of skulls in these centuries points to the fact such “scientific observations” are painted with a cultural brush. See eg table 1 from Lieberman (2001):

This tells us, again, that our “scientific objectivity” is clouded by political and economic prejudices of the time. This allows Rushton to proclaim “If my work was motivated by racism, why would I want Asians to have bigger brains than whites?” Indeed, what a good question. The answer is that the whole point of “HBD race realism” is to denigrate blacks, so as long as whites are above blacks in their little self-made “hierarchy” no such problem exists for them (Hilliard, 2012).

Weebs are cancer.

Note how Rushton’s long debunked- r/K selection theory (Anderson, 1991Graves, 2002) used the current hierarchy and placed dozens of traits on a hierarchy where it was M > C > N (Mongoloids, Caucasoids, and Negroids respectively, to use Rushton’s outdated terminology). It is a political statement to put the ‘Mongoloids’ at the top of the racial hierarchy; the goal of ‘HBD’ is to denigrate blacks. But, do note that in the late 19th to early 20th century that East Asians were deemed to have small brains, large penises, and that Japanese men, for instance, would “debauch their [white] female classmates” (quoted in Hilliard, 2012: 91).

Asians are r-select, the most numerous race on the planet by FAR. I have covered this before. They swamp local resources and have inhumane population density. That is characteristic r-selection, with low overall group loyalty (close family doesn’t count, they’re low trust societies) and low group altruism (low altruism to animals as well).

Africa is less R than Asia.

Asians were also considered disease-ridden pet-eaters and we know how that went.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_plague_of_1900-1904

Where they go, death follows. Almost like America tried to keep them out until the 1960s…

Class is a confound for any immigrant.

From end of top link:

So if Chinese cheat on standardized tests, then we should not accept their IQ scores; the fact that they, for example, provide non-random children from large provinces speaks to their dishonesty. They are like Lynn, in a way, avoiding the evidence that IQ scores are not what they seem—both Lynn and the Chinese government are dishonest cherry-pickers. The ‘fact’ that East Asian educational attainment can be attributed to genes is false; it is attributed to hyper-selectivity and notions of class and what constitutes ‘success’ in the country they emigrate to—so what they attempt is based on (environmental) context.

lemmings at best, narcissists adopting the local mask (r-types) at worst

Common sense conclusion, the so-called redpills shall ignore it. 

Then rediscover it in a decade while we’re at war with them.

https://raceandiqmyths.blogspot.com/2016/10/fake-chinese-iq-studies-richard-lynn.html

A table was presented by Lynn showing 31 IQ studies on China’s population. A claim was made that “there are no samples on Chinese population citing IQ to be less than 95”. Here I will present contrary data set on China where average IQ results are less than 90 which as per Lynn’s claim do not exist. First lets look at IQ of China which is presented:-

Call out China.

Always, always call out the Commies.

Obviously when the data came into the scientific community, almost everyone was shocked not because of high results, but because of consistency of data. Average IQ in 31 different regions of China was within 10 points.

That never happens. If it sounds fake…. it probably is.

As it is noticed in IQ testing, average IQ in cities is 15 points higher than rural areas.

107-15 = 92

105-15 = 90 (assuming former number is true)

100-15 = 85 (one full SD below the UK)

94 (from old study above) -15 = 79

No wonder they have no trouble enslaving one another. What else would they be good for at that level?

On top of that, average IQ heavily depends on the people tested. If you were to test factory workers, the average will be 90. University students will show average of 110. So, the scientific community always doubted his work on China.

Uni students always score 110-115, that’s why they’re Uni students. Poor analogy. Stop relying on student scores to describe full adults, IQ people, it’s poor method (generally). US college students are like 115 at the low end.

How did he test Chinese population for IQ ?

A website was created and people were asked to take IQ tests. Unlike African samples where people were downward selected, Chinese IQ was upward sampling of population.

Chinks are renowned for forging ANY online test. Disregard Lynn.

TLDR: So Lynn lied about China’s low IQ, covering for them.

When he himself had previously taken data to that effect. Then he’s been caught fudging modern data and boosting its minimum to help them save face (and get into places like Eton).

I’m quoting most of that post in block for reference in case his site goes down:

Lastly, how easy it is to cheat on internet IQ testing. It’s quite easy. The results should not have been published as there is no control over test takers over the internet. There are many websites where even people in Latin America have reported 118 average IQs on many people.

It doesn’t really make sense to compare this IQ data on China with Thailand where most samples cited are in rural areas. Better will be to compare the data with Bangkok which shows IQ of 103.

Anyways, here are the low scoring IQ samples on China’s population :-

Wang, 2001 (Average IQ of 76-81)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/wang-2001.pdf
Average IQ: 81 and 76

81+76 /2 =78.5

Hong, 2001 (Average IQ of 65-82)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/hong-2001.pdf
Average IQ fluctuates between 65 and 82 for china, depending on amount of fluoride in water. Shandong province, china.

65+82 /2 =73.5

Li, 1995 (Average IQ of 79-89)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/li-1995.pdf
Average iq is in between 79 and 89 for china. Guizhou province, china.

79 + 89 /2 = 84

Yang, 1994 (Average IQ of 76,81)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/yang-1994.pdf
Average IQ for china is 76 and 81. Jinan, China.

76 + 81 / 2 = 78.5

An, 1992 (Average IQ of 76,84)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/an-1992.pdf
Average IQ for china is 76 and 84. Guyang county, inner Mongolia.

76 + 84 / 2 = 80

Guo, 1991 (Average IQ of 76,81)
Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/guo-1991.pdf
Average IQ for china is 76 and 81. Hunan province, china.

76 + 81 / 2 = 78.5

Lower results are in mild fluoride regions and higher results are in very optimum conditions.

Very optimum doesn’t count. Optimum would maybe but very? Anomaly.

ALL of those studies cited, averaged: 

78.5+73.5+84+78.5+80+78.5 (check me, weebs)

473 / 6 =

78.8333 recurring.

MUH SUPERIOR CHINESE IQ.

well they do think Communism is a good idea so

Also 78, the Congo (source).

The question arises, why did Lynn ignore these samples on China’s population. Well, if you go out with a propaganda of proving one nation smarter than another, such result manipulation is a must.

If my people had an average of IQ78, I’d make money printer go brrr too.

On top, these are the samples that are done in very optimum conditions like low fluoride, etc. and in top notch states of China.

Imagine if I cite these article which are pretty much done on rural population of China and compare it with cities in Europe, I will be able to prove that Europeans have average IQ of 105 and East Asians to be 83. Isn’t it. Its just a matter of what you want to show to the world.

aka Lynn is a liar.

and when I bitch about class and SES confounds, I’m being accurate.

Here are the IQ results in European cities:-

https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/NationalIQs.aspx

Amsterdam: 109.4, Hamburg: 109.3, Warsaw: 108.

Even in South East Asia, India and Iran; you get IQ data to be 103+ in cities. Urban rural gap is only due to cognitive clustering in urban areas.

IQ in Bangkok: 103, Iran(urban): 105, Lucknow: 110, Ahmedabad: 104. There are several reports covering the same which I will discuss later. If the Chinese IQ data is to be compared, comparison has to be done in urban samples on rest of the world.

Exactly it’s like measuring height when one guy jumped.

Now, it has been proven that IQ dataset of China has also been obtained by selective citation just like any other nation. A question arises as to why East Asians do better on PISA which is an unbiased sample covering entire population randomly and unbiased ?

TLDR: they don’t. They cover to avoid giving out a lot of data. Typical Marxists.

I will talk about the Chinese. I will talk about Korea, Taiwan and Japan later on. Results of Shanghai and other urban areas were published. Chinese government did not allow PISA to publish the results of other provinces. A statement was made by PISA that “we have done PISA sampling in 12 provinces in China and in some of the poorest regions, you get performance close to the OECD average.”

Its a very generalized statement which doesn’t really mean anything. “Close to the OECD average”. It can be 50 points less or 20 points. Unless, PISA results on China which are held back are released nothing can be said about average IQ of China.

Weebs always look silly.

However, results of Chinese in South East Asia are well known and they do not show high IQs.

Imagine my shock. What next? Are there not hot singles in my area?

Let me attach PISA scores for you. Source:https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfin…
On maths PISA:- Singapore scored 573, Malaysia scored 421, Thailand scored 427.
On reading:- Singapore scored 542, Malaysia scored 398, Thailand scored 441.
On science:- Singapore scored 551, Malaysia scored 420, Thailand scored 445.
Mean scores:- Singapore: 555, Malaysia: 413, Thailand: 437. (All in the report).

There are 3 million Chinese in Singapore which is a magnet for cognitive elites of China, 8 million Chinese in Malaysia, 10 million in Thailand.

A common argument given is that Malays and other races pull down the scores in Malaysia. It is well known that “other races do not pull down scores” in SEA and even if they do, the gaps are negligible. It is well evident in Singapore school results which I will discuss later to compare East and South Asian IQs.

For verifying whether there is multi modal distribution in PISA scores in Malaysia, I had to calculate the percentile of scores.

There is a table mentioned in PISA report which is attached above. Or detailed results can be seen here (https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfin…). Page number 308 and 309:-
In Singapore:- 10 percentile score was 432, 25 percentile: 501, 75 percentile: 650, 90 percentile was 707.
In Malaysia:- 10 percentile: 319, 25 percentile: 363, 75 percentile: 474, 90 percentile: 530.

In Thailand:- 10 percentile: 328, 25 percentile: 372, 75 percentile: 476, 90 percentile: 535.

Even top 25 percent of Malaysia has an average PISA score corresponding to 98 IQ that is 87 percentile of Malaysian PISA data (520 is 100 IQ and 100 points is 1 standard deviation as discussed before). If I assume that all these are Chinese (that is each and every person of Chinese decent scored better than other races), how does it lead to high IQ and PISA scores among East Asians. This is the best case estimate.
For decent estimate, average IQ of Chinese in Malaysia: 95 IQ, Thailand: 97 IQ (according to PISA reports).
Performance in PISA level 5 and level 6:-
Page 31:-
Singapore: 29% students above level 5 and 6.
Malaysia: 0.9% students above level 5 and 6.
In Malaysia (a nation with moderate education system), “at the absolute maximum” 2.5% Chinese students scored in level 5 and level 6. V/S large majority of Chinese students in Singapore (“minimum 6.5% and maximum 38%”).
You can clearly see East Asian PISA score to be same as Czech Republic level once we include Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore; instead of just concentrating on Singapore which is a magnet for China’s cognitive elites.
Czechs, you know, our overt intellectual superiors, fellow whites.
Chinese IQ in SEA (based on PISA) is 98 (best estimate) and 96 (decent estimate).
And PISA is the most reliable large scale study on IQ.
So, at their expat best is still below our average. Explains the nepotism. And the expectation you NEED to cheat versus white kids to even get in.
What’s the Asian dindu nuffin?
As IQ of China is unknown and there are contrary studies (some showing very high IQs, some very low IQs) and as large scale studies like PISA on China are unavailable to public; it is resonable to assume that China’s IQ will be same as Chinese living in SEA as per PISA reports. Chinese in SEA are net importers of high skill immigration from China unlike China which is a net exporter of high skill immigrants. So, at any cost Chinese IQ cannot be more than Chinese in SEA.
Logically.
Now what about the people especially the bloggers who post IQ of 115 for China. To be frank, most of them are misinformed. IQ of 115 on China is based on an assumption that presently IQ of China is 105 and China will score 115 due to optimum living conditions and first world environment. That’s not the case.
Wait, so they’re crystal-balling it?
Hard cope from the race mixers.
Muh magic dirt of the Western schools + clean air nurture theory BS.
Present IQ data available on China shows 95 IQ or 97.5 IQ as per Lynn’s work (which is based on his own calculations). 105 is the long term ceiling of IQ in China.
So not even 105 ever, let alone now.
Lynn is such a cucky little shit. Weebs keep rigging data like this to be anti-white, no wonder he keeps getting funding.

112 is the PISA IQ for Shanghai which is the highest IQ recorded in China where people are living in absolute optimum conditions. As cities generally score 15 points higher, average in China cannot be more than 105. Even the estimate of 105 comes at the cost of assuming optimum living conditions (excluding iodine deficiency, etc., etc.). Present IQ of China as per the data available is 95 as people are not living in optimum conditions. Many of the states have iodine deficiencies, many have underweight children.

But again if I start optimizing IQs for the rest of the world, most nations would score very high. To be frank, Africa and South Asia are the biggest victims of malnourishment and iodine deficiencies.

By the same logic: If China is smarter than us, so is Africa.
Talk about rationalizing a fetish.
While comparing IQ of two nations, you cannot compare an optimised number for one with an unoptimised number for another nation. Isn’t it.
“optimised” and futuristic = rigged
might as well be sodding Terminators

So, Lynn’s IQ comparisons between Europe and China by taking an optimised number for China (105) and an unoptimised number for Europe (97) is unacceptable and not in lines with the scientific methods of research.

If the data cited on other nations is un-optimised for iodine deficiencies etc.  etc.; why is he comparing it with an optimized estimate for China ? Of-course if you want to propagate a racial fallacy in the public, such stuffs are required. Even nations in Europe face iodine deficiencies at par or higher than people in China and European IQ can also be adjusted to 104, or I can calculate European IQ by taking highest scoring city in Europe, Amsterdam and subtracting 7 IQ like how he is doing for China which will put Europeans at 103. Isn’t it.

Plenty of European countries are white trash. We all know it. Try living near Little Polands. Thugs.
Eastern Europe didn’t have the same selection pressures as North West and hence has no First World culture, as we’d recognize it.
And rather Europeans face much higher iodine deficiencies than East Asians and I will show the same with appropriate data later on. On top of that, East Asians do not face any mal-nourishment. In the above text, I showed a few samples on East Asia in mild fluorosis regions that the average IQ in such villages is also in low 80s, let alone 100+. If I show East Asian IQ samples where they are done on malnourished population, the results will be very very low (less than 75 IQ).
LOL

So, it is funny if he is optimizing East Asian data to 105 and Europe is kept constant at 97 because it is Europe that faces higher environment contamination due to iodine deficiencies, etc.

And remember, the IQ numbers of India, mid-East that is shown in his book is not optimized unlike East Asia.

The main purpose of him writing his book is to get famous in the public by propagating a racial fallacy that is far from the truth. The scientific community does not acknowledge his books which does seem to be a fiction.

I will further prove that average IQ in Iran in optimum living conditions is also 105, same as people in China (in my coming posts). And will present relevant data.

here

Explaining Adultery, parts of the Bible, disease etc.

No one has typed out an explanation of this, to my knowledge. Sure there are linguistic essays but… still.

Here’s the logical explanation of certain things. Ending with collaborating science.

Adultery is a sin because it’s a pollution of bloodlines, that’s why it’s called that but the sexual action or compulsion is already covered under the coveting commandment. Fornication between two singles, while a sin, is not polluting the bloodlines of the marital couple. It doesn’t defile the marital bed, as the Bible puts it (Hebrews 13:4). It’s “and” adulterers, they’re discrete categories. The adultery involving one married party may produce a child with defects (especially with the effect of STDs from sleeping around, which they’d bring back to the marital bed, onto their own children – and might kill them), or the child maritally or the one “extra-maritally” may eventually marry their own part-sibling and then produce defect. All the sexual prohibitions are henceforth founded in an avoidance of bloodline corruption.

They’re not being ‘lame’ and killing your ‘buzz’ man, it’s babymaking. Don’t make broken babies!

The sterile view of reproduction is like a Marxist’s view of labour – delusional.

re Deut 23:2 and the mistranslation in later editions:
Legitimacy is based on bloodlines more than marital status but under the parent-approved marriage model the former suitability led to the latter ceremony. They’d have veto power on funding the wedding and allowance of inheriting anything should the child try to brattishly insist on an adulterous match. Banishment (disowning) is the parental right should the child “dishonour” (commandment) their parent’s standards. A bastard didn’t refer to unmarried parents back then but moreso what we’d call politely a hybrid, Darwin a mongrel. Later editions mistranslated the concept of ‘bastard’ for ((reasons)). Logically, unmarried parents could feasibly marry at any point in the next 18 years and 9 months, the insult cannot be based on something so easily remedied. Instead it’s “in the blood”, it’s about the “seed”, it’s genetic. It’s the existence of the kid itself which is the affront, the offense to the holy, and that’s why ‘bastard’ is levied at the child – not the parents! They brought shame on their pre-existing family (bloodline) by virtue of their dishonourable existence, of a blemish. The OT often condemns men who mate with ‘foreign women’, the archetype of demonic seductress. That’s why usually understanding God (who forgives individuals) forbade the child to enter the church, holy ground, sacred temples, unto the 10th generation, because it was a perversion of his creation and divine, famous plan for separation of peoples; its existence was Satanic, a testament to playing God. Its existence was an insult to God, directly, it was an ABOMINATION.
Now we have the medical stats to back this up from the individualist perspective, from mental problems to organ death from child cancer, nobody mentions it…?
Why? Why not? Who’s behind that cultural ignorance?
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Race-Mixing/
The sins of the father onto the child i.e. you produce an unnatural thing, it suffers unnaturally.

Period blood isn’t the only unclean thing: https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Semen

So bad marital discernment (selection) relates to the reprobate mind. Selection is the ONE job of men looking for a wife. The Bible gives plenty of advice on men seeking a wife, what to look for.

Cast not ye pearls among swine, neither spill your seed, it’s very simple conceptually. Don’t waste a breeding opportunity with a bad match or selfishness. You want societal shame back? Start with masculine self-control (Lev 22:4) because you’ll be healthier for it. This isn’t just spiritually good but physically too. Like don’t stick your dick in crazy. At least a woman’s period isn’t alive for all the stigma, there’s nothing to kill. God designed women to self-clean the baby oven, there’s no shame in it. Poor analogy to the modern Onans. You have a specific story about sexual continence, sexual hygiene, call it whatever, it’s being a man.
https://www.openbible.info/topics/spilling_your_seed
https://biblereasons.com/evil-women-and-bad-wives/

If you marry badly, that doesn’t absolve you of responsibility for her sins. You’re the man, you’re responsible, be she some Polish whore (they’re mostly marrying Arabs and Japs) or an ABG/LBFM thot (mostly autists).

Prov 22:14  The mouth of an adulterous woman is a deep pit; a man who is under the LORD’s wrath falls into it.

I’m picturing the conceited weebs who start lecturing the rest of us (projection in ego defense of their error) on how white people in the West should become more Asian. You eat the bugs first, bug boy. Such cucking is, as you can see, Biblically predicted as God’s wrath upon the reprobate mind. Insecurity breeds insecurity, misery loves company, fuck-ups want you to copy them.

If everyone fails, the sexual Marxists reason, then nobody fails!

They want no holy (wholesome, pure) group to be able to compare poorly to.

deceit, malice, envy….

https://biblehub.com/romans/1-28.htm

why be envious of people you claim to be doing better than? Why talk about the West at all after you left? Why are you obsessing over it, if it’s inferior culturally? Racial deserters should STFU and stay in their jungle. We don’t want to hear from you, stay gone. There’s a rise in snarky gammas online giving weeb “commentary” that sounds like CCP propaganda. It’s anti-white, sod off. Why should we care what you think? You ran away from the problems, drop them. It’s like a Boomer who retired to France complaining about UK immigration. No Susan. You don’t get to.

Stats show up their forum anecdotes as fantasies. They wanted mixed bloodlines, right, they’ll be happy with the black grandkids I presume (since mixed dates other mixed, statistically).

In Deut 7:3 even the unequal yoking between the races is forbidden, before the prospect of children is mentioned.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy%207&version=KJV
Cultures are intended to be sovereign. Interconnection is weakness.
7:4 says how mixed marriages are insults because of cultural cucking i.e. your child will adopt foreign ways.
Learn to tell your kids no, Boomer. JUST SAY NO.

Otherwise, unchecked, they “invent new forms of evil” like the conceited weebs that are becoming the new Fedora Boy.

insolent, arrogant, boastful….

It’s like the Gap Year story that never ends.

NEVER.

And we’re all expected to listen to it.

One word: why?

Do evil, fine, don’t be boastful though. I shouldn’t be socially expected to listen to some woman’s sob story about how she married a Muslim either. Tough tits, bitch. You knew they was a snake. You signed up for shit. It’s like the thots joining Islamic State, I no longer feel loyal to you either. I owe you nothing.

Stop coddling them. They’re grown men rationalizing objectively, scientifically shit marriages.

And encouraging the same multicultural evil to other men, that’s gender treason. You shouldn’t enable it.

There were 10 basic rules. Multicultural tradlarpers moved, so please stop talking to us like you’re a Westerner. You’re an outsider now, ree.

https://biblehub.com/romans/1-32.htm

Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things are worthy of death,they not only continue to do these things,but also approve of those who practice them.

Worthy of death, how would God manifest that in case of adulterous children?

Suicidal temperament, perhaps?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

Cancer risks?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25792752/

Our results confirm that there are ethnic and racial differences in the incidence of childhood leukaemia. These differences indicate that some genetic and/or environmental/cultural factors are involved in aetiology of childhood leukaemia.

American diet means you should compare to European whites for accuracy. Twinkies are thots, not food groups.

The highest risk of ALL was observed for children with a combination of Hispanic ethnicity and White race compared with non-Hispanic whites (OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.44).

They actually leave out mixed of most studies e.g. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14559954/

unless they can rig the numbers from the small group because it’s so bad in outcome. It’s impossible to find prevalence data, why?

It’s true in other species scientifically, outbreeding depression is unholy, it defiles the wholesome in God’s eye. That invites wrath.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10762398/

https://academic.oup.com/jhered/article/96/2/114/2187513

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12144669/

Mixing stunts growth, even in plants. Sure, you might have kids but great-grandkids won’t happen.

So what was the point?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15487997/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14983018/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15807418/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9375532/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4066391/

Deny the lies of the spiteful mutants, anti-natalists aren’t so toxic to the zero sum of Darwinian competition. To actively encourage our genocide is evil.

Funny that the cuckservatives slagging off the Boomers want a free pass to act just like them despite decades of data now. That didn’t exist for them. You’re living in the experiment.
And yes, the Boomers should’ve been disowned by their parents for marrying wrong or too often.

They’ll deport, sorry “return” tortoises for their own good – but not humans.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19426071.300-galapagos-tortoises-untangling-the-evolutionary-threads.html

The spiteful mutants of the Boomer gen became worse in the spiteful mutants of Gen Y and Z – but nobody is condemning them.

Science and Bible agree, how much do you need?

I heard a theory the trash segment of Boomers should’ve been picked off by war like Vietnam and the draft dodging is the main cause of our dysgenics. Possible and funny.

So how to know the weeb boys abroad are lying?

Weeb offspring and mental problems:

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/uoc–baa081108.php

A new study of Chinese-Caucasian, Filipino-Caucasian, Japanese-Caucasian and Vietnamese-Caucasian individuals concludes that biracial Asian Americans are twice as likely as monoracial Asian Americans to be diagnosed with a psychological disorder.

A+ parenting.

Zane and his co-investigator, UC Davis psychology graduate student Lauren Berger, found that 34 percent of biracial individuals in a national survey had been diagnosed with a psychological disorder, such as anxiety, depression or substance abuse, versus 17 percent of monoracial individuals. The higher rate held up even after the researchers controlled for differences between the groups in age, gender and life stress, among other factors.

1/3. Over a THIRD of them are literally mentally diseased at the intensity to diagnose.

The study included information from 125 biracial Asian Americans from across the U.S., including 55 Filipino-Caucasians, 33 Chinese-Caucasians, 23 Japanese-Caucasians and 14 Vietnamese-Caucasians.

Stop listening to spiteful mutants.

Nobody’s jealous, they’re clinically evil. Shun the reprobate mind.

High diversity, low trust society: https://web.archive.org/web/20061013041712/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/c4ac4a74-570f-11db-9110-0000779e2340.html

deport the whores

nb. The edgy anti-natal rhetoric worked on the Boomers first, ask the dead half of Gen X. However, there’s more than one way to skin a cat and clearly more than one way to commit genetic suicide.

The womb is a very sophisticated form of printer. It prints people. That’s why women hate being conflated for one, it’s an appliance. Don’t defile the womb of your people, that’s treason. Do not corrupt the seed.

Plato’s natural slaves, do not follow. Degenerates are compulsive liars e.g.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203037/

https://sti.bmj.com/content/87/Suppl_2/ii14

Syphilis infection in sex workers ranges from 8.8–9.5% in the Yunnan province to 8% in Guangdong to 3.5% in Beijing (Chen XS, personal communication, 2010).

https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article/24/4/431/503360

High levels of infection in these groups are found in most sub-Saharan African and South-East Asian countries. There is a high rate of concurrent infection for HIV and other well known STDs in patients. Rates as high as 70% of HIV infection are found in African patients with STD, whereas the rates are reaching 15–20% in patients with STD in Thailand [9,10].

Ting Tong has HIV. 1 in 5, roll the die to die. Is it really cheaper to live there with pozz med bills?

If you wanna larp as a gay guy, at least do fun things with your prostate.

If you get her a green card?

https://hyphenmagazine.com/blog/2010/05/study-finds-disturbing-std-rates-among-asian-americans

Over the course the study, Hahm unmasked some myths common about Asian Americans. She said, “There’s a perception that Asian Americans in particular aren’t practicing sexually risky behaviors.  But we found that Asian American young women are at risk of high STDs.  For instance, Asian American women had a higher prevalence of STDs than White women in both 1995 (10.4% vs. 7.7) and 2001 (13.5% vs. 8.3%).  The incidence of STDs (not diagnosed with STDs in 1995, but developed STIs in 2001) among Asian American women was also higher than that of White women.” Moreover, the power dynamic between genders became immediately clear.   Asian American women were four times more likely to have a STD than their male counterparts. “This was shocking,” said Hahm, “It was so much higher than the males.” Accounting for the gender disparity, Hahm suggested that…“Asian and Pacific Islander women also have broader interracial dating patterns than Asian American men. This might explain why these women are exposed to higher rates of STDs.”

when you mix, expect an itch

I think these findings definitely go against some prior conceptions about Asian Americans and sexually transmitted diseases. The 4:1 ratio of STDs among Asian American women to men is astounding. To see what this means, I looked up some global data of STD rates around the world, broken down by gender. In East Asia, and on every other continent, women have slightly higher STD rates than men, however nothing comes remotely close to the 4:1 ratio among Asian Americans.

It’s unclear what the study means by “power dynamic,” whether it means sexual power/demand, or power within the culture. One can speculate on a wide variety of reasons for why the STD rates are the way they are. I’ll refrain from doing so, but nevertheless I thought it was noteworthy to bring up, as a point of discussion. How does this strike you?

it means they culturally celebrate and enable whores – like the childbearing geisha

Trust no thot nor weeb.

Blood type is racially determined, like fertility problems

https://www.babymed.com/pregnancy-test/ethnic-distribution-of-blood-types

There are four main blood types: O, A, B, and AB and two Th factors, positive or negative. Most people are either A positive or O positive and the fewest are AB negative. Because blood types are genetic, they are inherited from the parents,  blood types have different racial and ethnic differences. The majority of people in the world and across various ethnicities have Rh+ blood type. Subsaharan African populations have a 97-99% Rh+ factor. East Asian communities have 93-97% Rh+ bloodRh factor is a big determinant in both fertility and pregnancy. If you’re Rh-negative, you will need to take certain precautions during your pregnancy because an Rh positive fetus can conceivably be affected

wait so does Nature abort hybrid babies?

if the RH negative mother has previously been exposed to Rh positve blood and creates antibodies that cross the placenta and attack the fetus’ RH positive blood.

It isn’t our fault Asians need IVF more and more often fail at it, it’s literally in their blood. What are they implying otherwise, a curse?

https://www.babymed.com/pregnancy-test/blood-test-blood-type-and-rh-status-and-antibody-screen

Asian Women & Fertility Problems

Race is biological, see.

Unfortunately, many Asian couples face challenge trying to conceive naturally or using fertility treatment. The decline in natural fertility and the lower success of IUI and IVF in Asian women is documented in The US, UK, China, Japan, Korea and other Asian countries.

Fertility in Asian countries has declined to the population replacement rate 2.1 or lower. Many factors contribute to decline in natural fertility in Asian women;

Not our fault. Not our problem. Nature tends to curb the over-population of r-types by introducing more threats to thin the herd.

It happens to Asians who never lived in the West, stop blaming whites.

Repost on the Asian female infertility problem:

When compared to Caucasian women, Asian women undergoing IVF significantly produce less eggs at all Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels, even in women with high AMH. AMH is the most accurate marker for ovarian reserve.

Gynecologic and medical disorders that impairs fertility: PCOS, endometriosis and Systemic lupus (SLE) are more common in Asian women.

Vaginismus : may interfere with regular intercourse in some Asian women.

Environmental Factors: Asian women has more exposure to methyl Mercury and vitamin D deficiency.

Culture : surveys of Asian women and men indicate that they are less likely to consent to be contacted for fertility research, are fatalistic about failure to conceive, less informed about fertility issues, only 36 percent knew that chances of getting pregnant declined with age, and are less likely to suspect a male factor.

Asian women are commonly late at seeking care for infertility and overestimate the chance for getting pregnant.

Look at the national IQs, hardly surprising.

Genetics : Many genes are likely involved. FMR1 is a gene on X chromosome responsible for Fragile X syndrome and its variants. High repeats at this gene may reduce ovarian reserve.

It’s literally genetic. R-selection doesn’t keep those repeats low in the populace.

Did pesky white women interfere with their genes?

Yeah we tinkered with the Ts, the Gs, the As, all of it!

Fertility Treatment Outcomes in Asian Couples

  1. Pregnancy and delivery rates are lower in Asian women following ovarian stimulation and IUI compared to white women
  2. IVF: when compared to white women in the US,  31 per cent of the Asian women gave birth successfully compared to 48 per cent of the white women. Asian women were also less likely to become pregnant; 43 percent against 59 per cent even after control for many fertility factors. Endometrial lining was thinner in Asian women compared to Caucasian women.

Shit, is white supremacy real but only for women? We did need to weather the Ice Age.

I think endometrial lining has a connection to T-levels, it gets thinner with higher T, if memory serves.

I didn’t find enough conclusive data on white men v Asian when I linked sperm quality studies. A little but not as clear. There are fewer studies like that on men in general.

Asian women should be aware that fertility treatment may be less successful and seek care of a reproductive endocrinologist and fertility specialist as early as possible.

In addition there are other factors that require attention in Asian women during fertility treatment especially the higher prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection.

?

After conception, asian women at are a higher risk for gestational diabetes.

https://obi.org/blood-donation/scientific-facts/

Only 18% of people in the U.S. have a negative blood type. Yet, when someone with a negative blood type needs blood, only another person with a negative type can save his or her life.

The blood type correlations to medical conditions like mental problems really trigger SJWs.

Are rh negatives more intelligent?

I may sound conceited but yes, yes we are.

That’s why anglos, who have a lot of Rh-neg, have so many historic geniuses.

From obi

Blood type by race/ethnicity:

O-positive is the most common blood type. Blood types vary by ethnic group. More Hispanic people, for example, have O blood type, while Asian people are more likely to be type B. In 2014, Oklahoma Blood Institute saw this ethnic diversity and blood types in its donors.

The O stats for whites are shockingly different.

Limited by who donated, wish I could find broader data.

Some patients require a closer blood match than that provided by ABO positive/negative blood typing. For example, the risk of a reaction to transfused blood can sometimes be reduced if a patient receives blood that is from a donor with the same ethnicity. That’s why African-American donors may be the best hope for patients with sickle cell disease, 98 percent of whom are of African-American descent.

Why mention this now?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8434167/Study-ties-blood-type-COVID-19-risk-O-help-A-hurt.html

“Why do ‘BAME’ get it more?” Well damn I dunno, maybe look at their blood type?

If they don’t wanna catch it here they can always …. go somewhere else?

The EU is the least of our problems

the UN are just thug world police for NWO.

Which NWO?

Glad you asked, old bean:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation

The SCO.

What the MSM never talks about in the West. Bet you never heard about it.

Don’t worry, most people haven’t.

Every time I tell people Russia and China are officially in bed (making the Russia accusation really Chink ones), people don’t believe me until I show them. Russia outsourced its Marxism to China, like everything else.

The Soviet Union never died, it simply changes premises.

China + India = 2819328161 (inc. most planetary fighting-age men)

+ Pakistan = 3040220501

+ Russia = 3186154963

+ Uzbekistan = 3219624116

+ Tajikistan = 3229161811

+ Kyrgyzstan =  3235686006

+ Kazakhstan = 3254462713

Population data from:

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/

Minus the feeble and elderly from the Western figures in your mind so….

3,254,462,713 = 3.25 billion members before considering entering members.
Check my stats.

World population when I checked: 7791849800 or 7.79 billion for short later.

41.767% before counting other nation members.

Over half of the world’s population, practically speaking, are in one full union and …. you didn’t even know about this?

So no you can’t 2.2 kids fuck your way out of this from the comfy little suburbs, even including the genetic suicides like MGTOW and dregs of spiteful mutants like SJWs. You could force every single fertile white woman to marry every equivalent man (forcing men to marry) and it still won’t outcompete them in quantity because they’re r-types.

Whites are the global minority, in extremis. I have long since covered this. Go forth and multiply Boomers, you had ONE job. Proof if one generation drops the ball (abortion, inc the Pill) we all suffer. Especially if they enable the super-boosting of the birth rate of the out-group too. The NWO types were breeding us all like cattle for a war, yet to happen. Nothing short of a full Malthusian trap and mass deportations would work now.

Asia is the most r-select continent and race, Africa is also the least of our problems.

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/asia-population/

4.6 billion and counting, the global MAJORITY. Weebs BTFO. Most of the planet is Asian, they’re such blatant r-strategists. You’ve been cucked genetically already by the bleeding heart of your forebears’ “charity” (really pathological altruism).

4.6/7.79 = 59% Asian. The planet is 59% Asian. Stop ignoring this.

You can’t discuss a future for the West until you address this. It’s redpill reality.

I included my maths, you have NO excuse. What’s the SCO called, again?

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/africa-population/

1.33 billion and counting. Stop heeding lies. 

1.33/7.79 = 17% African. Statistically, they’re not a threat to us.

Europe?

Even if we count everyone in Europe currently (wrong) and also Russia (wrong)…

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/europe-population/

747 million. 0.7 billion.

0.7/7.79 = 8.98% “European”.

We’re practically dead already, the weeb shit is psyops to ensure a gradual transition.

The EU is more productive than China due to its native K-selection (higher national IQs predict GDP) but that won’t last long thanks to the immvasion.

https://www.worldometers.info/population/china-eu-usa-japan-comparison/

Okay, the skeptics ask, but where is the money? To tank the West, they must have a lifeboat right?

You are right.

Related: the financial side, the SWIFT alternative Russia joined in… 2014, I believe? I covered it here, nobody cared. Not a single prepper has ever had the wits or balls to talk about it.

https://www.rt.com/business/472016-russia-india-china-swift/

https://www.rt.com/business/455121-russian-banks-chinese-swift/

But I’m imagining it, aren’t I weebs?

Check my statistics, bitches.

Tell me, are Russians still white, brother?

Islam on the Rise in Russia

Who is the race traitor… pray tell?

Fastest growing religion in Asia? Is its culture really so supreme?

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-fastest-growing-religions-in-the-world.html

“A young population coupled with high fertility rates will proliferate Muslims to account for 32% of the global population by 2060.”

https://www.cnn.com/2017/03/16/world/islam-fastest-growing-religion-trnd/index.html

They know. They also told white men getting married was ‘too risky’. Boo hoo princess, grow up. Do you get in a car? Don’t do it, it might crash! You sicken me.

For once, the cover models are all-white.

Celebrate the barren life!

If you don’t believe me, you’ve seen that one, have you seen this?

Yay! We’re dead-ends genetically!

MGTOW are pure Establishment propaganda at this point. Whatever the origins, it’s now a weapon.

Why do you think they’re still around financially? They haven’t been “cancelled” on all socialist media?

The so-called ‘incel’ violence (really bachelor is the historic term until age 35) is just a white person version of a terror cell, an anti-white terror cell. Their forums are a cult where nobody is allowed to leave or be happy with a family. Happiness in a family unit doesn’t exist, don’t believe the studies!

So noble, so intelligent.

Because dehumanising white women and only whites as ‘females’ makes you cultured. Nothing like those evil SJWs, who don’t believe in the word ‘woman’! Can you imagine being that easily triggered by the word ‘woman’?

Like fine don’t marry, celibacy has always existed, fairy. It isn’t special. Bragging about something you haven’t done is worse than bragging about something you were born. It isn’t even a thing. At least Africans were born black, they did something.

I have run the numbers.

Try to look young forever, rather than be a breeder, ew!

I covered the circumcision/viagra connection.

Bonus:

Member states plus three observers:

3,254,462,713

+ Iran, Belarus, Afghanistan = 3,386,833,331

Bumps it up to 43% of the whole world population, so far. As white Westerners are dying apace.

 

Tell me: why isn’t this in our news?

Why is the white minority stuff never ever ever mentioned to be already here?

Well, I foresee this ending well. Signed, Malthus.

Asians offended at race-bending thing they do

Stop getting surgery and using skin bleach or STFU.

I don’t see how that deluded girl’s use of make-up and apps is any different than yours.

They’re just jealous that she’s naturally prettier. Die mad about it. You’re not pale with blue eyes and blonde hair and a gracile jaw, suck it.

She’s responding to market forces.

Actors have done this for centuries, you’re not special. Asian minstrels larping as white didn’t exist until you had white people larping on stage to copy off of, it’s like trannies stealing “drag make-up” from the stage.

If the transrace thing is a thing maybe everyone is just not racist enough to self love?

Asians are also hilarious when they try historic, famously white vintage make-up styles. Say, like that tragic cat eye flick.

You don’t look like Marilyn, you look like a cartoon about the opium war.

Who u foolin?

Her pretending Asians don’t wanna look white is funny when they’re literally bleaching their skin*, hair, eyebrows, getting lip surgery, jaw surgery, eye surgery, breast, ass and hip fat implants/injections and then deliberate, daily make-up looks of classic white beauties, all to look white.

Cat-eye flick only looks good with white girl eyes, just accept it and stay in your lane.

It’s like how Africans claim to be blonde because of one island of inbreds. Yeah, no shit they’re recessive?? Anomalies mean nothing. A few Europeans look Asian, it means nothing. Maybe an ancestor had an affair, probably?

*The REAL reason they have to wear tons of high SPF, it’s medical. With the ongoing treatment, their skin is as damaged as a chemo patient. That’s why they wear SPF indoors where there’s no sun. The light through the window would cause burns on the bleached skin. Look it up. It’s known about the “treatment” for things like the patchy thing, vitiligo?

It’s either “racist” or “privileged” – just deflect the criticisms, right? We’re sick of it.

Privilege appeals to white supremacy – to call white people “privileged” on the basis of genetics is literally pushing a white supremacy argument, coupling with shame instead of pride. It’s still the same exact theory. It implies there’s nothing we can do about it and to pity the brown and yellow people for being genetically impoverished.

Shit, sorry make-up techniques designed by us, for us, look better on us?

Funny how that works, and applies to EVERYTHING.

I have seen the funny spectacle of Japanese men who thought they looked white by wearing our suits.

It doesn’t work on them. It wasn’t meant for them.

Sure, this girl looks like Ditto – but she’ll grow out of it and appreciate being hotter than these cunts.

It is awkward that some Asians actually look like that, just with a broader flatter nose.

It would be like pretending the Jeremy Kyle people don’t exist.

People are allowed to have a range of features, must we patronise Asians like we pander to blacks now, pretending they’re all cute?

Rhinoplasty essential oil:

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/Nose-Up-Heighten-Rhinoplasty-Essential-Oil-30ml-Nasal-Bone-Rmodeling-Pure-Natural-Nose-Care-Thin-Smaller/32792535834.html

It’s annoying as a woman when a moron from another race asks “how you did” something…. with your face. It isn’t make-up. Most people don’t contour their face to oblivion and draw on new eyes. Like, what do you say? It’s a race thing, you can’t say anything! You could literally get arrested for admitting you have an eye shape. Oh, but they can ask offensive questions, and we can’t ask why they try it on with us…. uhuh.