Asian and Mixed women most likely to die in childbirth

They never ask why (mixed babies, unnatural). Surely, if you cared about reducing it, medically you’d need to know why? They already know why. Do you think they don’t collect this data? Why no stories from mixed or Asian women? You’d see the white guy cuck husband theme in the photos.

Scroll for the graphic.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/nov/11/black-women-uk-maternal-mortality-rates

“The findings show a slight drop in the maternal mortality rate for black women, but remained the same for mixed ethnicity women and Asian women, which was two times higher and almost twice as high, respectively.

The report published by MBRRACE-UK (Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk through Audits and Confidential Enquiries across the UK) has deepened calls for action to tackle longstanding inequalities.”

GENETIC DIFFERENCE, GENETIC CAUSE. – OCCAM’S RAZOR

Black women have wider hips but higher obesity rates. They’re also more likely to give birth as teens, when death rates are much higher since the body isn’t finished developing. It isn’t rocket science.

Heart disease, epilepsy and stroke were the leading cause of maternal death during or up to six weeks after the end of pregnancy. Sepsis and thrombosis and blood clots are the third and fourth most common causes

Most of those are obesity related. Are white women supposed to knock the snacks out your hands for you?

Sepsis is a hospital problem. Don’t blame us. I’ve nearly died from poor hospital cleaning procedures years ago, I hate them too. White women are susceptible to hospital germs too. Germs are not white supremacist, you fucking midwits.

“We remain deeply concerned that black and brown people’s basic human rights to safety, dignity and equality in pregnancy and childbirth are not being protected, respected or upheld.”

They’re all brown, Amy.
There’s no right to equality under MOTHER NATURE.
There’s no right to safe childbirth according to MOTHER NATURE.
Government cannot over-ride MOTHER NATURE, Amy. It’s EVOLUTION, Amy.
Mother Nature (or God’s design operating via this realm) is trying to kill off abominations, Amy.

Run a study and test it, Amy.

This is why the NHS is doomed, absolute zombie corp.

“There’s currently no way to quantify the issue. We can count the deaths but we don’t know how terrible things are.”

IT’S GONE DOWN.

that’s counting? for black women, it went down
if this is about equality, you’d want deaths of ALL races to go down? Instead, it’s anti-white.

This is why we need synthetic wombs. So these activists can get a job at Starbucks, where they belong.

https://www.aims.org.uk/journal/item/mbrrace-2020-report

There continue to be racial disparities in maternity care, with Black, Asian, and mixed ethnicity women significantly more likely to die than their white counterparts.

Cry harder, we’re also better at IVF, like everything else.

Maternal suicide sadly remained the leading cause of direct deaths that occurred within a year of pregnancy.

How the fuck can you blame whites for that? If they need an asylum you’d complain if we put them in one!

I’ve also covered the mixed race mental problems in other posts, browse the tag.

The report states that 90% of the 566 women who died had multiple problems which included both physical and mental health problems. 

Again, not our problem.

119/556 dead were non-white. So most of the women who died were white but the Guardian covered it like a black issue? Get out.

281/556 obese. Put down the cheetos, fatty. This is mostly natural selection in action.

198/556 had mental health problems….. and decided to stay pregnant? Really? Is that our fault too?

216/556 were immigrants, no right to exploit our NHS, good riddance.

Outcomes for women from different racial groups are not equal.

SHOCKER.

There remains more than a four-fold difference in the mortality rates amongst women from black ethnic backgrounds, a three-fold difference for mixed ethnicity women and almost a two-fold difference in women from Asian ethnic backgrounds compared to white women.

Mixed was THREE FOLD over white women?

The Guardian lied and said double. I WONDER WHY. As such a small group, this is huge.

Regular Asian-only was DOUBLE the white rate despite being a splinter of the population. I’ve seen a trend of invading Asians calling themselves thin but “with a tummy”. A big gut means you’re obese. It’s a liver disease state. You’re obese, you’re just a short-arse too. Still obese. Still fatal. BMI is based on height.

The body fat percentage of Asians is also higher than white women, who have more muscle, meaning they’re obese at smaller dress sizes. This won’t get flagged up unless you accept racial differences. I have covered BMI obesity studies between the races. Maybe look at the bloody obvious differences like that?

EVOLUTION IN ACTION: (YES, THERE’S A GRAPHIC).

What about miscegenating couples only? Oh, they don’t publish that data. You think they don’t collect it? If the result was better, it would be headline news. It’s worse or they’d publish it.

26% of the women who died (in the perinatal period, up to six weeks after the birth) between 2016-18 were born outside of the UK, 36% of whom were not UK citizens. People born in certain countries had a significantly higher risk of death compared to those born in the UK. Table 1 is taken directly from the MBRRACE report which shows the number of deaths from certain countries, those with the highest number of deaths. It is very clear here that the relative risk is higher for those women from specific countries.

Hey you climbed into the oven by coming over to trust the NHS. We wouldn’t. That’s like signing your own death warrant. Socialist systems have socialist results.

I’m guessing lower IQ countries, someone else check.

Bangladesh, China, India, Nigeria, Romania. Yep, retards. Shitting in the street countries and pimping out their kids to foreign pedos still. Watch this pro-Asia cope:

While there has been a decrease (although not statistically significant) in the number of Black and Asian women who have died, there was an increase in the number of deaths of Chinese/other and Mixed Race people as shown in figure 3. We are still a long way off from seeing an actual reduction in mortality rates. Changes in conversation are not enough, action needs to be taken.

There are no suggestions or comments in the report to work towards this change. It is only discussed that reports are being commissioned, meanwhile racial disparities in maternity care continue..

SOMEBODY NEEDS TO STOP THEM. Well, we want to. You won’t let us.

Almost like these changes are racial differences, eh? The Guardian didn’t mention Chinese/Other women nor mixed women, did they? What a cover-up. No changing Mother Nature.

Drink it in, boys. Drink it in.

It isn’t systemic racism, it’s natural selection.

https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/news/2021/systemic-racism-key-risk-factor-maternal-death-and-illness

NEW MEME:

systemic racism is code for natural selection

The soft euthanasia for the simply led, Great Test of the Degenerates

Pleasure Island is turning them into asses. Did you think this genie has no tricks?

4,000+ words but worth it.

“Why do we assume that the elite want the fat, mindless, degenerate, and self-sterilizing subhumans”
I have never assumed this, because I have spoken to these people. Some of them are more intelligent than their critics. Ahem. I’ve been warning you all for literally years at this point. Arable land is dwindling, the human population CANNOT increase. The First World is becoming second due to food scarcity and food banks are not a first world phenomenon.
The subhuman, untermensch as they’re actually called, are not self-sterilising. Especially the useless breeders on welfare I see pushing along ugly brown crotch meat in prams, Little Britain style.

This aired on UK television by the BBC but Youtube removed all the clips including it.

They’ve been mocking these people for years. The slothful live some of the longest lives thanks to free healthcare and a low stress life, and it’ll crash the retirement system motivating the productive people who keep society running. This will kill everyone, a hard crash. I wouldn’t be surprised if they ban retirement*, as I keep warning the manosphere and FIRE people. They can do it, pushing the age up indicates the desire. Their programme was necessary for the good eggs to survive of the species (letting the rotten ones imagine they’re special in a bubble of delusion) but the deceit was purely for their own ease, to prevent the difficulties of quelling unrest during selection.
They self-selected for death. This is critical as part of the ritual to summon the Anti-Christ. Their mongrel (impure) blood including their dead children and their lost potential lives are sacrifices. This is also a sacrifice for Satan, god of THIS world (small g, powerful prince). Think like them!
It’s also been aimed as part of white genocide to finish us off, to replace us with Asians, who are obedient and very stupid, whatever the propaganda trying to justify their rule over you (like the Jews, look at Israel’s national IQ and compare to Asian nations). Does this add up with their lack of innovation, ever?

What many of you praise as tradition is their primitivism, they are savages shitting in the street and torturing dogs, eating their food alive. It isn’t a choice! Genetically they murder their geniuses and are not genetically the same people as the rulers thousands of years before, but only the label has remained. They are murderous sadistic and subhuman. They create, only leech off white people. By taking out white people, the Satanists know Africa will perish minus our ‘charity’ and Asia (who’s been holding random farmers down in videos on bitchute and forcibly injecting them!) will become weak and suddenly need the Nouveau Babylonians, enabling a takeover by the usual suspects. Their plan is a smart one, albeit quite evil in places.

Jews own the biotech companies responsible for this, but none of you will talk about it. This is a genetic weapon and I wouldn’t be shocked to find racial disparities, especially in the sterility of men and women. They’ve sequenced your DNA with those gimmicky test kits, I said never to use them. The Terms and Conditions clearly give them permission to use your DNA for ‘research’. If this targets low IQ genes for selective sterilisation, so be it. That would be good for the species, overall.

*They can do it sneakily like mandates, like blocking your NHS care or making life impossible if retired. This is the more probable method. If they openly do it, you can openly fight back.

“If we are ruled by an arrogant and aesthetic elite that values bloodlines, intelligence, and talent, is it not at least possible that clown world is a crucible intentionally designed to eliminate the weak, the stupid, and the ugly?”
That is called natural selection Vox and it REQUIRES evolution and adaptation of traits. Calhoun’s utopia is a good study. It models Empire decline. You cannot deny the entire paradigm, especially as it unfolds before your very eyes.
They’ve deliberately made men weak, so weak they cucked their countries for paper fiat and their own genes by mixing races like a cuckoo bird, making mongrels as it’s called in Darwinian theory. These mixers will gladly allow their own sister to be gang raped. They’re unfit specimens of men and frankly I’m glad so many of them won’t reproduce. Did you know ancient Satanism had eunuchs in the temples serving the women? Look it up, why don’t you? It’s true. Pro-multi-racial white men, happy to exterminate their own race (undoing centuries of wars preserving it*) for porn-brainwashed lusts, are the eunuchs of the Jewess elite. Why isn’t origin of the species taught in schools? It would let the idiots in on the plan for them. Read the sub-title of the Origin book.

“The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life.” Actual title. Go look!

Discussions of this exist: http://eternalvigilance.nz/2012/07/darwins-nazi-textbook-the-origin-of-the-species/

“Hitler got his ideas about the Master Race and sub humans directly from Darwin”.

Not quite true, I’ve linked the textbook on archive.org talking about the demise of “Aryans” (white people) about a century ago, the Master Race concept is the Chosen People one from Judaism. I think the book was goading ‘Anti-Semites’ in the title. A Programme for Anti-Semites or something, good read, very based. Written by a eugenicist so highly relevant. Spoke of depopulation, I quoted from it.

Cuckoldry is celebrated in the press. It’s blatant. Clearly cucking is part of this, mixing out or corrupting. You scrape and bow to Satan, he’s well within his rights to chop your dick off.
They only want their own children to fuck the smart ones.
This becomes simple if the retards, which politics is a test for, are sterile. Why did so many celebrities have more kids, between 2014-2019? Even the teens. Why did they go on so many holidays? Even Robert Downey Jr had another kid. Why? Why not wait a few years? They knew ahead of time, expecting a mass die-off from WW3 due to start 2016-17 (when travel would also be blocked or unsafe from nuclear radiation) then sterility of the unfit (not drafted) remainder from the genome therapy.
The HPV ‘vaccine’ causing less fertility in women was the test case for this, they tried hushing up the woman who found the birth stats comparing normal women v HPV shot takers. I think I posted about it myself. Politicians aren’t giving it to their own kids, of course they know. THE ROYAL FAMILY has yet to comment on whether their spawn have had it. WHY ELSE but making it easy to explain why they’re still fertile, versus lying with a backpedal if they pretend? I’ve mocked them for this.
Has Saint Meghan commented on whether her kids have had it? No, oddly silent from the loudmouth. Doesn’t stop her running literal shows, on a stage like a clown, telling others to inject THEIR kids.

*I believe I covered this in Where did all the good men go?
They died in the world wars, mostly, saving their low IQ ‘comrades’. I knew one story of a brave twit (he was in the papers and everything) who recently saved his two “friends” from drowning, swimming where they weren’t supposed to (there was a sign, literally a sign they saw and ignored, and he warned them not to, and a public swimming pool was five minutes away!), only to die himself after rescuing them. This story was expected to get sympathy from me, as his friend told me about it, Obviously I was disgusted and if anything, found it morbidly amusing. Stupid is, as stupid does. I called it a prime example of natural selection culling someone with no self-preservation instinct, and all the more stupid for saving two selfish arseholes who wouldn’t do the same for him, or even listen when he warned them not to swim. If they respected him, they wouldn’t have hopped in so they cannot claim friendship. He should have walked away, adults should not need adult supervision (!) and let Mother Nature check their arrogance. Superhero films are a psyop to have good people bail out the bad ones destroying society like termites, pretending this tolerance of evil is a virtue and they’re a good person for being nice to the scum instead of a traitor cashing out. Don’t cast your pearls before swine, you will waste your finite pearls. Back to the drowning rats story. I called them future Darwin Award winners and pointed out stupid people are determined to kill themselves eventually (usually ODs) and it’s irresponsible to expect the rest of us to coddle them and risk ourselves for their amusement. Fun is not a fitting excuse. Fun is the preserve of children, and these voting military age men are emotionally retarded manchildren who should be punished for feeling entitled to swim where it’s literally illegal. Dependency is not friendship, they’re parasites on the conservative types of society (constantly running after like nanny cleaning up their messes) and now their ‘friend’ is dead for it. Then we’re not equals if they need us to stay alive and cannot be trusted by themselves. They should be in asylums if they cannot be trusted to make their own sane decisions to STAY ALIVE. The two Tweedles were likely psychopaths, indicated by the arrogant fearlessness, psychopaths who have notoriously short lifespans, so the messiah complex is moot. They’ll die soon anyway, but the societal reaction is telling of our dysfunction. I laughed about this tale of selection pressures to his (dead guy’s) dopey friend as she told me the sob story, saying he should’ve let the idiots die, since it was their choice to ignore common sense and a literal SIGN** and now the world has lost a “good” (albeit gullible) man for two morons. That’s a bad trade. I said his two ‘friends’ should feel ashamed because they are responsible for his death, they are murderers. Logically, legally, they are fully responsible for that whole situation and should be in prison for causing the situation, at least counting as homicide and reckless endangerment. They should throw away the key, in my opinion. Do not die for someone who isn’t a blood relation, it kills the hero genes and spares the craven genes. Collectivism kills. White man’s altruism has become pathological altruism, destroying ourselves to prop up savages. This is a society that enables such retards and further, pities them. She said I shouldn’t say it but she had no further logic to offer against the point and had to concede I was right about them all. Women are more harsh in breeding choices than men, have to make decisions for past and future children in sum, and will gladly abandon individual diseased specimens to the forest for the wolves. This shouldn’t be stigmatized, it’s for the good of the species. Society can do nothing with them but medical science keeps them alive (playing God) rather than curing baldness or something. Do you want to fund drooling potato people with your tax money, suffering in ways previously impossible? Men made this culling of the unfit illegal to preserve their own rape babies, women opposed. Their body their choice is a dark morality tale about natural selection. If it’s okay (or good!) when Spartan males did it, leaving the kid to die of exposure, why not when women did it in the forest? There’s no difference in the deed. Isn’t that a higher standard that the mother perceives her child too weak to survive? Women are not the problem here, men enable retards and ruin their societies by permitting them to reproduce. See the BPD mothers making trannies. The eugenicists warned this would happen, read back. No time in history has allowed more subhumans to survive puberty, no wonder we all hate the pop culture. It reflects the lowest common denominator. It’s Idiocracy. We stopped Mother Nature so she’s punishing us.

Apply this to world wars 1 and 2. Heroic men never returned saving the slowest fool in their combat group. I hope the medals going on ebay were worth the end of your line. Military units are meant to be arranged by IQ, this is why they test it. Or smart ones will die babysitting the idiots. AKA WW1. Sound familiar? Drowning guy is a real life fable. Also why we have ‘sets’ in school so the retards don’t hold back the smart kids. If we’re so equal, why are grades a thing? It should be pass/fail, as equalists AGREE with me. So apply this to post-WW2. Women were left to breed with the dregs and that’s why Boomers are historic fuck-ups in general, kids of foot-shooters. (Gen Y are also trash people, I admit, as spawn of the kids of the foot-shooters, it’s a sewer chain of shit). Kakistocracy, rule by shit. They’re the fruit of the cowardly loins of half a century of dysgenic selection. Can Vox deny it? He’ll just pretend it’s something else but that’s the literal term scientifically. Something easier to sneer about. I don’t find this a laughing matter. Intellectual honesty is important, our future is at stake. Our so-called civilization celebrates retards then complains of retardation. It cruelly keeps defective children alive burdening their parents from caring for the healthy offspring. High infant mortality is a sign of a thriving society. Natural selection must return somehow and a hard reset chemically is a viable means practically. Ethically it’s dishonest, that’s my only fault with it. Give cash prizes to the self-sterilised, simple! Then again, their pride…… selling them on social approval was a masterstroke of evil genius. Prestige-seekers are PC trash. Can confirm.

**The dead guy’s mother wants the council to put up a rubber ring (seriously) to rescue drowning people at the site (where you’re not allowed to swim). I pointed out it’s no wonder the guy died with such a retarded mother, that she doesn’t get how giving the morons a bail-out would incentivise them to swim in the first place. Even fear of death wasn’t enough to stop Tweedle Dumb and Tweedle fucking Dee. Thus, stupid people encourage further stupidity, QED. It’s contagious and this is degeneracy. A process of stupid rhetoric infecting the rest of us. Take the warning labels off and don’t respond to Jackass style 999 calls. All the signposts in the world can’t stop them, they’re mental. Let Nature take its course. Let the annoying kid chewing on batteries just get it over with, before he takes half his classmates with him on a field trip to a cliff. Their concept of fun is fatal. Fearlessness indicates the simpleton more than the great man. These people are like nuclear radiation, making everyone around them endangered by their idiocy.

So you see why the depopulationists have a series of stunningly logical points.

We must address those to understand their methods, long before considering opposing them. Look under the depopulation tag, please. I used it on this post. Work your way out from there, I have explained them in great detail. Playing God (like Satanists) caused this, opposing God’s Will of who is to die, so doing the same more directly could theoretically fix it. It’s eerily sensible. A kind of degeneracy accelerationism. Targeting the Pharisees, haughty eyes, dissension causes and busybodies. In short, NPCs. Normies too dense to question this morally dead culture. It’s literally Biblical, it’s amazing. They redpilled us via SFF.

Like the boiling frog, this was a big psyop. A test of adaptation to evil, willingness to serve evil, so as I’ve said for ages, it’s only fair that those most eager to rule over us or throw us in death camps are the ones selected to suffer with debilitating illness and die, genetically or literally. It’s just. Turnabout is fair play.

Now nobody will pity them and nobody will show them mercy because they have earned our contempt. The wolves in sheep’s clothing are unmasked. We now know who our friends are and which relatives proudly wish for our death. You tell me normies aren’t over-populating, go on!

Is it such a crime if such subhumans can no longer infect society like a parasite, taking us all down with it? I propose one day we’ll praise the Satanists and secretly thank them for doing the job for us. I hate to say it but…. they’re mostly right. For the wrong reasons, but right. Do we ‘save’ the cancer to kill its host?They’re dead-ends anyway. I’ve been mocking the anti-natal for years. They hate life, they’re evil. Proof:

The beauty of the screeching and gnashing as they realise they did it to themselves would be exquisite. They never expected to be forced to abide by their own virtue signals. Satan is the Father of Lies. Remember how you said people are having too many kids and should cut back for the planet? Surprise! You’re infertile now. You can’t be angry, right? I’ve written on the Satanism of Extinction Rebellion.

Who would pity such contemptible scum?

They wasted years in sexual relationships when they had ample chance to breed, most of them.

Generally, we might surprise ourselves by our grudging gratitude. Politics is genetic and this may effectively make left wing parties impossible. It’s already kinda happened. The only concern is invasion and EU style replacement. Other than that, have they done anything wrong? These adults consented to it. They knew it was experimental. They knew there were risks. They knew there were studies showing harm but told themselves it wouldn’t happen to precious snowflake Them. They ignored the big DANGER sign like the Tweedles in the drowning story. They still lined up happily for the warm and fuzzies to sneer on social media at the “paranoid conspiracy theorist crazy” Christians. Clapback emoji cunts. They saw people having seizures immediately after, online. The footage was admitted to be real in the media, can you explain that? They closed their own eyes, that’s the worst part. They saw prime footballers (the Dane) faceplant and die on the pitch, to be brought back, barely. They still went back to do it again like Russian roulette with a needle. They had headaches and rashes, bruises, lumps, swollen limbs and weakness and heavy or missing periods and kept going back for more. Is stupidity illegal? I ask sincerely, it’s a conversation the Right must endure. Do we throw them in asylums, then? They’ve done this four or more times. Can they be trusted to live in public? Do we need leper colonies, especially if their bodies never stop producing the spikes, which can be passed on sexually as STDs are? Do we need to protect them from themselves? Do we ban everything because a moron might misuse it? That’s gun control logic.

It’s a reverse handmaid’s tale. The fertile women are worshipped due to rarity, the barren used as impotent tax workers, like single men. I suspect the SJW will despise this system. They sold their soul for fleeting popularity. Suicides may be in the offing. Family life in the future keeps many going. I keep seeing pity party comments on social media about miscarriages after getting the clot shot, pointing out they chose to drug their unborn child does not go down well. Hoping they learnt their lesson when nope! They say they’d do it again, 100% of them. Such people are unfit to be parents, your one job is to protect them. ONE JOB. They’re already having a meltdown over losing one foetus, especially the IVF Asians.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p036kbsz

“the odds of an Asian woman miscarrying is up to one and a half times more than the general population”

an extra 50% risk

The manosphere hides this from you.

  • APIs facing infertility have been shown to experience extreme psychological distress including loss, anxiety, depression, feelings of hopelessness and loss of control, anger, resentment and low life satisfaction. [6]

from https://ivfresources.org/asians-and-ivf

When I say suicide, I’m not joking. There’s science. They’re talking about it openly.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319451/

Nature is trying to tell them something.
https://www.reuters.com/article/health-asians-ivf-dc-idUKCOL97340220070309
https://creatingafamily.org/infertility-category/why-women-of-color-are-less-likely-to-get-pregnant-with-infertility-treatment/

It’s the soy diet in their case. Synthetic oestrogen is toxic. They’d look feminine with the real thing.
https://www.endonews.com/asian-women-at-higher-risk-of-endometriosis-and-less-likely-to-conceive-with-ivf-but-not-because-of-their-endometriosis
https://endoempowered.com/soy-products-bad-endometriosis/
Soy baby formula should be banned for causing it too: https://endometriosis.net/living/soy-diet

This is proven fact.

Naturally, Asian females have higher levels of testosterone. The lawyercunt jaw is a dead giveaway.
“Studies of South Asian women with PCOS show that they have higher levels of insulin and testosterone from the article below. Put down the MSG.

These women are freaking out over losing one kid, thinking they can always try again. Right now.

Imagine the prospect of all of them being born dead.

Suicides are on the cards. Who would pity these entitled wretches?

Who here wants to pay for Boomer Viagra via Medicaid and the NHS? NOT I.

This is the best way of ensuring abortion almost never happens again.

Conservatives should be dancing in the street. Some people are too stupid to be trusted with their own fertility. They’re Alice from the Vicar of Dibley. Too stupid to use condoms or thinking the Pill is adequate contraception. It’s morally superior for them never to conceive, conception is NOT a human right and never has been. Some of y’all sound suspiciously left-wing with that shit. Free healthcare is Communist.

The shot could also make surviving children themselves infertile. IVF already causes oddly deformed children in the skeleton, Billie Eilish for example. Supposedly also mixed. https://www.hercampus.com/school/american/billie-eilish-ivf-baby-what/

She looks like an albino jungle bunny after 12 children. That does not look white. Curvy white women exist, not with those features though. You could shop her into an old Disney cartoon with a black filter and a skirt of bananas around her hips.

Close enough. Had to keep the hair.

Lily Rose Depp seems to be an IVF baby too. Also mixed and mentally fucked. According to rumour, already miscarried as a teenager, JD is a neglectful parent to allow her wild ways.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/johnny-depp-lily-rose-sexually-fluid_n_565321bce4b0d4093a58480f

Who wants the angry SJW to breed? The ‘sexually fluid’? Who wants the office race-mixing cuck supplicant to reproduce with the foreign bride? Who wants the CCN viewers to be fertile? Seriously, anybody?!

I’ve said before, several times, this world is a farm. It’s a farm to them. Human resources? Yes, they’re culling you. Why do you think I began posting about it with “They want to sterilise you”?
But it’s easier to select the ones lining up the abattoir.
AC: ” I think the planners and the puppet string pullers know exactly what they are doing. However if this is the case, it does not make sense in the context of the farmer looking to breed more docile, complacent sheep. It might make sense however if there were a farmer looking at the current crop of obese trannies, skinny manlets, and ultra-left NPCs, and deciding he needed to do some major selective breeding to salvage his herd’s reproductive viability.”
They don’t view it as a choice, but saving the body from the cancer, saving the good parts of society from the degenerate filth. I can’t say they’re entirely wrong on that.

I have mentioned this several times. They want reproductive fitness.
I’m more shocked Vox, in his denial of Darwin, believes in the concept. There’s nothing like it in the Bible.
I’ve explained this before.
This information was permitted online about the danger, before the genome therapy was available. They offered it first to people on ‘benefits’ aka welfare, useless eaters. They offered it to disabled children before ANYONE else and have pumped them with several rounds to finish the job. They’re dead already, dead men walking. It’s a soft euthanasia, silent and politically convenient. The parents cannot sue. I said it’s another Aktion T4. They wanted the right people to know it was deadly. This makes it nice and legal. They permitted my posts to stay live when so many were removed. WHY? They wanted the selection, they wanted the filter!
It was a living IQ test. Why do you imagine they wanted to give it to Africa? All the resources, none of the drains?
I said I’m glad they’re trying to sterilise the bleeding heart left wing demographic. Good riddance, it’s a better replacement for natural selection than nuclear war, which would destroy culture and good heroic genes. It’s a general good for society to let stupid people off themselves. I don’t like the lies, however. They even offered them prizes and cash, how much more obvious can it be? They were seeking the high time preference, low intelligence.

Literal Darwin Awards.

p.s. Natural Selection isn’t pagan. Civilization has been too indulgent to the extremely fat, ugly and stupid. Think of the Disney adults and Buzzfeed losers. The Satanic ‘elite’ as you call them, seek to correct the moral cowardice of Christianity. We no longer punish the glutton, the idler, the lustful, we praise them! Whole films are made for propaganda. If you can survive that, morally, you’ve earned your place reproductively. Christians have failed in the BS of tolerance. We no longer uphold God’s law (banishment) so he punishes us by allowing Satan to kill those who lack faith in Him and their godly time to die, preferring to trust medicine, to put their faith in man, as the Bible warns never to do.

Asians getting jaw botox to look more white

Asians have the broadest jaws, then Africans and finally Europeans. Feminine is code for whiteness, as a cluster of traits. This also explains stuff that looks weird like skin bleaching and eyelid surgery, they’re imitating those youthful features, as opposed to mature-looking tilted narrow slitted eyes and a square mannish jaw. They want to be trusted by white simps. They’re so hostile to white women in general because of what we have naturally (with scant exceptions that tend to have bug eyes) while they’re plastic surgery fiends to marry off their daughters. When surgery isn’t an option they use make-up, usually contouring or surgical tape.

to be honest, Meghan and some others do it too but that’s more common to mixes trying to look whiter than fully African women, who tend to appreciate their features more
however, it’s mostly a mannish Asian thing, to attract white beta providers like that woman in the Economist said (white fever is actually just searching for a beta simp type for them, she makes all the major decisions but makes him think it was his idea, they like dumb ones)
this way they can say they haven’t had anything done surgically and be technically truthful
look at her medical file before marrying a lawyercunt type
it’s a personality disorder and it always comes out like jekyll and hyde eventually
anyone who wants to change the basic structure of the face is mendacious
then we’re all meant to act shocked when the kids (especially daughters) are fugly, like did you SEE Mel in Melbourne’s daughter? Solid 1. I swear to Christ. One of the ugliest women I’ve ever seen, and she’s mixed with Irish, who are usually stunning. It’s tragic. Making ugly kids should be illegal. Leave them out in the forest. Why do you think women used to do that? Fug. Ugly kids get less parental attention, subconsciously hoping they die off.

This explains their weird gatekeeping of white women from make-up, even European 20th century make-up, since they presume white women already have the advantages they pay a lot for. No wonder they’re pissed but stay mad.

I’ll post about it later today for proof.

CCP opposing anti-Asian plastic surgery

Unsurprising since this goes against their pro-nationalist, pro-Asian propaganda push.

The culture of beauty is heavily racial. If you love the out-group, you do not love the in-group.
Anyone who praises European beauty, hates Asian beauty. The SJWs complain about this as Eurocentric.
Anyone who praises Asian beauty, hates European beauty. This is correctly called fetishistic when the person isn’t Asian themselves but also anti-white, which the SJWs approve.
A house divided cannot stand.
So yes, people can be racially self-loathing.

This idea ‘going abroad’ is a way to avoid Plastics is ridiculous when Asia and South America are actually bigger on it. I hope they bring in law so prospective suitors are informed about the procedures (with photos) long before an engagement or wedding because finding out when the kids are born fug is wrong.

the eyelid surgery is obvious

so is a nosejob (nobody is getting surgery to look more African)

fillers are aiming at profile ‘projection’, a white racial trait

“improved projection” White projection, because Asians have the same dip as Africans

the narrowing is also, frankly, white supremacist
since the Asian face (below) is the broadest of all major racial groups

Whitefishing eye makeup

The lengths these women will go to. I can’t understand the women who spend one hour on hair and one on make-up, if you look that bad just kill yourself. It’s easier. Obviously I’m joking but seriously, when men find the Frankenstein’s monster underneath that bullshit do you think they’ll stick around? So… what’s the point, then? Wipe half her face with a wet wipe and see if her beauty does a Houdini.

White people literally wake up like that, eyebag ‘definition’ and all and they literally coined eye contour like WTF. Equal parts Lisa Eldridge tips on the shadow blending and the eyeliner gap is Marilyn Monroe but the rest is absurd and basically plastic surgery with make-up. That’s no longer you but a face painted on to look like somebody else. That is a mask. A mask in natural colours but still a mask. The white techniques on white eyes are supposed to accentuate what is already present. When a girl with the characteristic egg shaped head is daring to label a video without surgery, that’s a laugh. (Egg heads don’t exist in nature like that, it’s too short and squat, she’s had jaw surgery and they even fold in the long ears to make them seem shorter). Also, if there are men who think pink glitter is a natural look I give up.

Rounded brows pointed down are also a white trait. The orbital ridge is shaped differently. That fake brow shape makes her eyes look bigger too. Microblading weirdness.

Theirs are naturally straight and upturned.

They’ve gotten so defensive about all of this whitefishing they’re daring to claim regular make-up use is Asianfishing now. You wish you looked like that, please. Most of your tips are stolen from white women who adapted to their natural faces. Your surgical shit cannot compete. It’s like tits, plastic doesn’t count.

Nobody is getting eye surgery to look like an angry Downie.

That jaw and ear thing is so gross and creepy. Like a gremlin. Cannot unsee.

Replacement is not just territorial, it’s cultural. Trying to replace Western beauty standards for women, with fake “Western” women. Genocide is artistic, if you read the history books. You’re not allowed to have an exclusive standard (i.e. natural, genetic beauty) nor criticize others openly for appropriating it (i.e. they rule over you, have the power to censor).

Divorce RISING in Asia, achtually

TLDR: The manosphere is selling you Titanic tickets.

One of two possible explanations: the low quality males being exported there are causing it and/or degeneracy is global and cannot be blamed on the West or Western women. Pick ONE or BOTH. It cannot be statistically denied unless you a bluepill little bitch.

DO THE RESEARCH.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233709670_Divorce_Trends_in_Asia
Abstract This paper presents and discusses recent trends in divorce for countries in Asia, highlighting both wide variations in divorce patterns and recent changes in divorce trends for countries in the region. Three broad regional patterns are evident: an East Asian pattern characterised by increasing divorce rates, though there are signs of stabilisation in some countries in the last few years; an Islamic Southeast Asian pattern characterised by declining divorce rates until recently; and a South Asian pattern with relatively stable and low divorce rates.

The paper also discusses divorce in international marriages in some East Asian countries and Singapore.

so try to find the PDF for that race-mixing fun! Isn’t there a piratebay for academic papers?…

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Age-specific-divorce-rates-for-women-Singapore-1980-2009_fig3_233709670
Like the West, women under 24 most likely to divorce because their brain hasn’t finished developing yet.
So they outgrow the husband.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Crude-divorce-rates-East-Asia-and-Singapore-1976-2009_fig1_233709670
South Korea rates highest among those in chart.

NO free rides.

JSTOR of paper: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43498086?item_view=read_online

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272506770_Divorce_in_Asia
The only areas that aren’t divorcing as much are Muslim.
Good luck enjoying your sinful way of life when your kids have to put up with rape gangs.

Onto some specific countries:

It’s almost like the r-types are toxic wherever they go… it isn’t the women, it’s THEM. Sexual locust.

However, they can divorce if they’re married to a foreigner. They can also claim asylum or citizenship (green card style) by going to the embassy of the foreign spouse’s country. Does the manosphere talk about this? No. It’s a ponzi of beach, e-books and pussy. Only a few at the top can actually succeed, by profiteering off the latecomers.
Contrary to popular belief in the manosphere (read: delusion) one CAN divorce as Filipino – as long as your spouse is foreign. See:

“The Church’s strong opposition to divorce is probably the main reason why the Philippines is the only country in the world, together with the Vatican, where divorce is not legal. Except for Filipinos who are married to foreigners and seek divorce in another country, and for Muslim Filipinos who are governed by different marriage laws¹, about 95% of Filipinos need to file a nullity of marriage or an annulment² to legally terminate their marriage. However, only a small fraction resort to these remedies because, while the outcome is uncertain, costs are high (usually not less than three months of average labour earnings, and sometimes much more) and the legal procedures are long and complex. Completing a matrimonial dissolution case typically takes between six and eighteen months but the procedure can also extend over several years (Lopez, 2006).”

Sorry I understand data, I guess? My opinions are based in reality.

It’s a technicality, she may not divorce you but she will still leave you.

STARE AT THE CHART. LOOK AT IT. NOT MY OPINION.

cook the rice, pay the price

They ain’t traditional, living in sin just isn’t.
“The increase in union dissolution has been accompanied by a parallel increase in the proportion of Filipinos who live together with their partner without marrying. In the past two decades, the proportion of cohabiting Filipino women of reproductive age almost trebled, from 5.2% in 1993 to 14.5% in 2013 (Abalos 2014; PSA and ICF 2014). As cohabitation has much higher dissolution rates than formal marriage (Figure 3), the rise in cohabitation will likely lead to an increase in the proportion of Filipinos who are separated³. The rise in cohabitation may also be attributable to the country’s “marriage crisis”: cohabitation may be preferable to marriage precisely because it is relatively easier and cheaper to end.”

And over HALF of Filipino women WANT to be able to divorce the weebs:

don’t hate the messenger, hate the data

“While most Filipinos still hold conservative views about marriage and divorce, a growing segment of the population is becoming more receptive to the idea of divorce. Figure 2 shows that over the last decade the proportion of Filipinos who agreed that “Married couples who have already separated and cannot reconcile anymore should be allowed to divorce so that they can legally marry again” increased from 43% in 2005 to 60% in 2014. This growing acceptance of divorce may have contributed to reducing the stigma of being divorced or separated, particularly among women, who were, and still are, expected to make all possible efforts to keep their marriage intact.”
The Bible says to forsake a cold or abusive husband so… dunno where they get that idea.
If women are keeping the marriage together, they are de facto head of the household.

“The increasing exposure of Filipinos to the urban environment (42.4% were city dwellers in 2007 and 45.3% in 2010) has probably contributed to this growing liberal attitude towards divorce. Urbanization is commonly associated with non-traditional lifestyles and behaviors, and reduces the influence of the extended family on the decisions of young people, including mate selection. This means that children do not feel obliged (by their parents’ choice) to stay in a marriage when it has become unbearable. This constitutes a break from a still recent past when parents and other family members exerted strong pressure on couples to keep their marriage intact in order to strengthen family bonds and protect the family’s reputation.”
No comment.

Muslims are also more likely to wish to dissolve than Catholics, because legally it’s easier for them.
(see link for chart)
https://www.niussp.org/staging/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Schermata-2017-07-06-alle-15.11.09.png
So it’s nothing special inherent in a religion, it’s the laws and how easy they are.

Predictably, higher IQ (education filter) women have higher rate of divorce. Well, high IQ can see something isn’t going to work, ever. The same is true of high IQ men. I don’t know why the latter isn’t mentioned.
“Figure 3 shows the odds ratio or the relative probability of being divorced and separated among Filipino women, controlling for different factors. Highly educated Filipino women have higher odds of dissolving their union than women with lower levels of education. Higher education in the Philippines improves the economic status of women and is more likely to provide them with financial independence. Indeed, a key factor for Filipino women when they leave their husband is their ability to support themselves and their children. This sense of independence and empowerment also enables women to transcend the social stigma of being divorced or separated.”
The education doesn’t cause that, it’s the IQ filter OF education in many ways.
The ones who move West rely on the white tax welfare state to support leaving, yet another leech. Again, they’re materialistic and see white men as money banks.

“As cohabitation becomes more common and as more Filipinos come to embrace more unconventional views toward marriage and divorce, the increase in union dissolution in the Philippines is unlikely to slow down in the coming years. The continued expansion of educational opportunities for women and the growing mobility of young people to urban areas will also contribute towards the steady increase in union breakdowns among Filipinos. With the recent change in leadership in the Philippines, the political atmosphere has also become more open to laws opposed by the Catholic Church, as evidenced by the strong support for the revival of the death penalty. Despite this, the Catholic Church remains a force to be reckoned with in terms of divorce legislation in the Philippines.”
TLDR: IT WILL BE MADE LEGAL IMMINENTLY AS THE OLD GENS DIE OFF.
ONCE AGAIN, THE MANOSPHERE LIES.

My own country has sensible voiding laws so expect those to expand in Asia too. In the UK, if your spouse hid an STD (including lifelong ones like herpes) from you prior to marriage, it is grounds to have the union voided. It’s also a crime to willingly pass on diseases, aka without prior informed consent, so if they were to go more traditional, the manosphere would be fucked either way.
Especially if they relate it to the death penalty and kill the cads. They claim to want patriarchy, but they really, really don’t.

MALAYSIA
https://www.rage.com.my/divorce-on-the-rise/
“IN 2012, there were 56,760 divorces recorded in Malaysia. That’s one every 10 minutes. It’s no secret – divorce is becoming increasingly common. The numbers have doubled since 2004, and when we did a manual check at the KL Family Court (which oversees non-Muslim divorces), there was an astounding 266 divorce petitions between April 28 and May 30 – and that’s just in Kuala Lumpur!
But those numbers aren’t just made up of jaded old couples. There has been a steep rise in the number of divorce petitions being brought by young couples, according to Goh Siu Lin, a family practitioner and president of the Association of Women Lawyers. Halimatunsa’diah Abu Ahmad, a Syariah lawyer, has also observed a large number of young Muslim couples seeking divorces in court.”

You don’t see the likes of Cappy covering this data, do ya? Just like he says you must kiss the feet of every central banker and a certain religion famed for usury has nothing to do with interest payment. Follow the Pied Pipers!

“Across Asia, the stigma attached to divorce often was the single biggest barrier to getting one. In this generation, that stigma virtually does not exist.”
“In an article posted on the East Asia Forum in 2013, Professor Gavin Jones of the Asia Research Institute of the National University of Singapore, said “divorce rates throughout East and South-East Asia appear to have been generally on the rise since the 1980s, partly because the stigma attached to divorce appears to have faded.””
“For a lot of young couples today, personal happiness outweighs an unhappy marriage….”
Global narcissism. GLOBAL.
An attempted abuser story:
“His own happiness was so important to him that he wanted out because he couldn’t change his spouse to his liking,” said Halimatun.
This is why courtship is so important. YOU CANNOT CHANGE ANYONE EXCEPT YOURSELF.
And why would a woman change after she got the ring? That’s insane.
“Women now make up 57% of Malaysian graduates — they are educated, financially independent and socially empowered. They no longer have to put up with harmful relationships.
…This means we will be seeing more two-income families, with young women progressively more career-oriented. That’s the good news. The bad news is, archetypal Asian stereotypes and thinking still exist, and the notion that a woman must shoulder the burden of household chores and child care has led to many divorces, said Goh.”

UP and coming economy = destroys family.
You picked this.

“In 1940, the average age of marriage in Malaysia was 18.5, and in 1970, it was 22.3, according to a research paper by Barbara Von Elm and Charles Hirschman titled Age At First Marriage In Peninsular Malaysia. Now, according to a National Population and Family Development Board survey on trends between 2000 to 2007, the average marrying age of Malaysians appears likely to increase to 33 in 2015.”

That’s a K force, good. Fewer unwanted kids. Demographic transition at play.

“But, perhaps just as importantly, getting married later could also greatly reduce your risk of getting a divorce. Sociologist Belinda Hewitt of the University of Queensland told the Sydney Morning Herald in 2012: “Basically, if you marry under the age of 25, you have about a four times increased risk of divorce.” Hewitt’s research also indicated that each additional year’s delay in marriage age reduces the odds of marital breakdown by almost six per cent per year for men, and nine per cent per year for women.”

So women are listening to the data and waiting.

INDONESIA
https://www.ucanews.com/news/indonesia-records-sharp-rise-in-divorce-rate/90725#

“More than 1,100 divorces have been recorded each day across Indonesia in the last three years, triggered by domestic violence and financial problems, a family care association reported.

It means that before 2017 an average of 288,000 divorces were recorded every year but the figure jumped to around 421,200 annually over the past three years, the association said.”

It’s easy to tell which MGTOW are wannabe abusers, claiming domestic abuse must be fake.
“About 80 percent of cases were filed by wives who suffered domestic violence at the hands of their husbands, said Sunarti.”
And for all the damage to children when their parents are divorced, it’s nothing to the trauma of living with an abusive parent or witnessing abuse of a parent. So hush.

And the Asian women are planning on locking down a white beta when Asians reject them.
https://www.economist.com/briefing/2011/08/20/the-flight-from-marriage
“WITH her filmy polka-dot dress, huge sunglasses and career as a psychologist, Yi Zoe Hou of Taiwan might seem likely to be besieged by suitors. Yet, at 35, she is well past Taiwan’s unspoken marriage deadline. “It’s a global village,” she shrugs. “If I can’t find a Taiwanese guy that accepts my age, I can find another man somewhere else.” Maybe—but since she still wants children, Ms Hou is also wondering whether to use a sperm bank or ask a male friend to be a sperm donor. She represents a new world of family life for Asians.”

STEP RIGHT UP STEP RIGHT UP
PLAY CPN SAVE A WHORE ASIAN EDITION

notice the race-mixers are the shit tier of whatever society they’re from?

https://www.economist.com/china/2016/12/03/divorce-is-on-the-rise-in-china
A huge cause is adultery. If only we had a Biblical solution to that. You cannot enforce half the Bible. It’s either sanctity of marriage or sanctity of mistresses. Pick ONE.

According to this, the weebs should be going to South America, but we know they just want a woman who looks like a little kid, so fuck data.
https://www.unifiedlawyers.com.au/blog/global-divorce-rates-statistics/
Marrying a Christian also means nothing, especially if one isn’t strong in the faith oneself. You don’t get a decrease marrying a Christian unless you also have always been a Christian. Recent converts, especially deceptive ones who feel entitled to ‘trade up’ to the church virgin after picking up STDs for years with no remorse, are like trannies in all their red flag glory. It’s the comparable gender equivalent. Sneaky fucker strategy in evolution, same thing. Your divorce risk will always be high if you’ve been to Pleasure Island, because of YOU. They act like female virginity can wash away all their sins, including divorce risk. Nope. If anything, the virgin wife would hold you to higher standards, including no porn or other cheating – causing divorce. I’d like to see that data. Do those waiting for marriage have higher standards to REMAIN married? I’ve seen so. Anyway, virgins want another virgin, not a used up manwhore (or ho). Nobody waits for a slut – who couldn’t wait for you. This PC idea you cannot help falling for someone is bull. Lust is not love.

Most common reasons include incompatibility (why did you date them?), infidelity (sue), addiction (sue) and abuse (again, sue them too).
“To get a divorce in the UK, you need to be married at least a year and prove to the court that your marriage has broken down due to one of the following reasons:”
True but you can void it if they had an STD and didn’t openly (i.e. not jokingly) disclose it before the signature.
https://www.gov.uk/how-to-annul-marriage
“the other person had a sexually transmitted disease (STD) when you got married”
just ONE

that’s the real reason the PUAs hate England
it’s legally tricky to be a slut here, from street harassment laws to passing on STD laws

CCP panic
https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Caixin/How-Chinese-fell-out-of-love-with-marriage
“Then there is the age factor. Chinese are increasingly getting married later. The largest age group of people getting married in China is now 25-29, compared with 20-24 in the past, while the number of people over the age of 40 registering for marriage has risen sharply.”
W-w-who will pay for the Boomers?
Themselves. BOOTSTRAPS.
“Most parts of China have witnessed a declining marriage rate since 2013. Generally, there is a negative correlation between a region’s growth in gross domestic product and marriage rates.”
The (((economists))) don’t say that.
“China’s housing prices have been rising sharply since 1998, stressing newlyweds and their parents. Between 2004 and 2018, the outstanding value of individual housing loans increased sixteenfold from 1.6 trillion yuan to 25.8 trillion yuan. In 2018, these mortgages accounted for 54% of residents’ total loans.”
Boomer housing bubble strikes again!
Kinda like Marxism doesn’t work? Nah, get banks to dole out eternal loans.
“In 1982, there were 107.6 boys born for every 100 girls. The figure rose to 110 in 1990, and to118 in 2000. It has since exceeded 120.”
When I say they will eventually ban race-mixing, I am not kidding. And where China goes, the rest of Asia soon follows. They will protect their men and their women from foreign conquest. And they’ll be righteous in doing so. Sexual predation is wrong. Poaching from foreign races is degenerate. Mark my words, they WILL bring in laws to retain their women.
“There is a growing trend of people getting married and having children later in life, which has created to growing senior-care burden that could become a serious drag on the country’s economy.”
K-selection, meet Marxism.
The Boomers could always… get a job?
“China should take measures to help people who cannot afford to get married and raise children. The government should introduce a comprehensive package of pro-family measures, covering housing, education and health care.”
OH YES, THE PROBLEMS CAUSED BY A MARXIST GOVERNMENT… CAN BE SOLVED, WITH MORE MARXIST GOVERNMENT!
BRILLIANT JENKINS!

and Asian Millennials are divorcing like Boomers.

Due to economic boom.

The Boomer housing bubble MUST pop. This is not a purely Western problem.

BMI in women, hormones and a little on race and Asian pregnancy

follow-up to https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2020/09/14/explains-the-asian-fitness-influencer-rise-asian-body-fat/

TLDR: Asians have higher BMI and body fat than White women. It’s a racial difference.

Logically, wouldn’t they have messed-up hormones and diabetes, then? Let’s see!

5,000 words -ish.

High BMI, high Testosterone
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27506736/

“cardiometabolic clinical correlates related to total testosterone (TT), free testosterone (fT), androstenedione (ASD), dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS), estrone (E1), estradiol (E2), and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG).

Results: Waist circumference and BMI (β-coefficient: -0.03; 95% CI: -0.04; 0.03) were inversely related to SHBG, and BMI was positively related to TT (β-coefficient: 0.005; 95% CI: 0.001; 0.009), fT, E1, and E2. Smoking was positively related to TT (β-coefficient: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01; 0.06), ASD, and fT. Systolic blood pressure (TT: β-coefficient: 0.002; 95% CI: 0.001; 0.003), hypertension (TT: β-coefficient: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.003; 0.11), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (TT: β-coefficient: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.01; 0.05), and total cholesterol (TT: β-coefficient: -0.03; 95% CI: 0.01; 0.05) were positively related to TT and ASD. Finally, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and metabolic syndrome (MetS) were positively related to fT, but inversely related to SHBG.

Conclusions: Our population-based study, with sex hormone concentrations measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, revealed associations between clinical correlates including waist circumference, smoking, cohabitation, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, and MetS with sex hormones. Thus, sex hormones and SHBG may play a role in the cardiovascular risk profile of women.”

I’ve posted about WHR before.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00479/full

Both obesity and anxiety symptomatology were separately associated with the same sex hormone alteration in premenopausal women: higher total testosterone level (0.97 ± 0.50 in obese vs. 0.86 ± 0.49 nmol/L in normal-weight women, p = 0.026 and 1.04 ± 0.59 in women with vs. 0.88 ± 0.49 nmol/L in women without anxiety symptomatology, p = 0.023). However, women with anxiety symptomatology had non-significantly higher estradiol levels than women without anxiety symptomatology (548.0 ± 507.6 vs. 426.2 ± 474.0 pmol/L), whereas obesity was associated with lower estradiol levels compared with those in normal-weight group (332.7 ± 386.5 vs. 470.8 ± 616.0 pmol/L). Women with anxiety symptomatology had also significantly higher testosterone and estradiol composition (p = 0.006). No associations of sex hormone levels and BMI with anxiety symptomatology in postmenopausal women were found.

Conclusions: Although both obesity and anxiety symptomatology were separately associated with higher testosterone level, there was an opposite impact of anxiety and obesity on estradiol levels in premenopausal women. We did not find an evidence that the sex hormone alterations related to obesity are playing a significant role in anxiety symptomatology in premenopausal women. This could be the explanation why we did not find an association between obesity and anxiety. In postmenopausal women, other mechanisms seem to work than in the premenopausal group.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11915780/

Regional fat distribution (RFD) has been associated with metabolic derangements in populations with obesity. For example, upper body fat patterning is associated with higher levels of free testosterone (FT) and lower levels of sex-hormone binding globulin (SHBG). We sought to determine the extent to which this relationship was true in a healthy (i.e., non-obese) female population and whether RFD influenced androgen responses to resistance exercise. This study examined the effects of RFD on total testosterone (TT), FT, and SHBG responses to an acute resistance exercise test (ARET) among 47 women (22+/-3 years; 165+/-6 cm; 62+/-8 kg; 25+/-5%BF; 23+/-3 BMI). RFD was characterized by 3 separate indices: waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), ratio of upper arm fat to mid-thigh fat assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI ratio), and ratio of subscapular to triceps ratio (SB/TRi ratio). Skinfolds were measured for the triceps, chest, subscapular, mid-axillary, suprailaic, abdomen, and thigh regions. The ARET consisted of 6 sets of 10 RM squats separated by 2-min rest periods. Blood was obtained pre- and post- ARET. TT, FT, and SHBG concentrations were determined by radioimmunoassay. Subjects were divided into tertiles from the indices of RFD, and statistical analyses were performed by an ANOVA with repeated measures (RFD and exercise as main effects). Significant (p < or = .05) increases following the AHRET were observed for TT (approximately 25%), FT (approximately 25%), and SHBG (4%). With multiple regression analysis, anthropometric measures significantly predicted pre- concentrations of FT, post-concentrations of TT, and pre-concentrations of SHBG. The SB/TRi and MRI ratios but not the WHR, were discriminant for hormonal concentrations among the tertiles. In young, healthy women, resistance exercise can induce transient increases in testosterone, and anthropometric markers of adiposity correlate with testosterone concentrations.

So exercise will boost a woman’s natural T. If they already have high T….

If their BMI is higher for their size, they already have high T comparatively. If they already have it racially… probably not good.

https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/95/16/1218/2520391

Results: Breast cancer risk increased with increasing BMI (Ptrend = .002),

Not healthy.

Rare study looking at race directly. White v Black.

https://womensmidlifehealthjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40695-017-0028-4

Results

Compared to the decline in E2 concentrations, androgen concentrations declined minimally over the MT. T (β 9.180, p < 0.0001) and E1 (β 11.365, p < 0.0001) were higher in Whites than in AAs, while elevations in DHEAS (β 28.80, p = 0.061) and A4 (β 0.2556, p = 0.052) were borderline. Log-transformed E2 was similar between Whites and AAs (β 0.0764, p = 0.272). Body mass index (BMI) was not significantly associated with concentrations of androgens or E1 over time.

so black and white is off the hook

Conclusion

This report suggests that the declines in E2 during the 4 years before and after the FMP are accompanied by minimal changes in DHEAS, A4, T, and E1. There are modest differences between Whites and AAs and minimal differences by BMI.

https://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12885-018-4558-4

Cancer and Testosterone link

Results

During a median follow up of 6.3 years, 45 patients relapsed. Testosterone levels significantly increased across BMI categories (p = 0.001). Both circulating testosterone and BMI were positively associated with disease free survival (p = 0.005 and p = 0.021, respectively). A significant interaction was found between testosterone and BMI (p = 0.006). For normal-weight women, testosterone concentration around median (0.403 ng/mL) or third quartile (0.532 ng/mL) showed a high significant HR of relapse (5.52; 95% CI:1.65–18.49 and 4.55; 95% CI:1.09–18.98, respectively). Overweight patients showed increased HR at increasing testosterone levels, reaching a significant high HR (4.68; 95% CI:1.39–15.70) for testosterone values of 0.782 ng/mL (95th percentile). For obese patients HR decreased (not significantly) at increased testosterone concentrations, explaining the interaction between testosterone levels and BMI categories.

Conclusions

In ER-positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients, high testosterone levels are associated with worse prognosis in normal-weight and overweight women, whereas in obese seems to be associated with a better outcome. Although the results require further validation, they suggest that assessment of circulating testosterone and BMI could help to identify postmenopausal ER-positive patients at higher risk of relapse and potentially open new therapeutic strategies.

High T isn’t good, even in normal weight women. Water is wet.

https://www.healio.com/news/endocrinology/20200515/high-endogenous-testosterone-levels-contribute-to-type-2-diabetes-risk-among-young-healthy-women

“The findings of this study suggest high plasma levels of testosterone could play a role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes among women,” Jon Jarløv Rasmussen, MD, PhD, a specialist registrar and postdoctoral researcher in the department of endocrinology at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark, told Healio. “The incidence of type 2 diabetes was rather low in the study, but the results implicate that screening for type 2 diabetes among women with higher plasma levels of testosterone may be beneficial, even among women who are young and without established comorbidities, such as polycystic ovary syndrome.”

In a retrospective study, Rasmussen and colleagues analyzed data from 8,876 healthy women (mean age, 38.5 years) who provided blood samples to measure plasma testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS), dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) between January 2007 and December 2015. Researchers analyzed androgens using tandem liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry. Researchers used Poisson regression models to calculate incidence rate ratios for developing type 2 diabetes during a median follow-up of 8.1 years, stratified by androgen quartiles.

‘Normal weight’ women can get Type 2. Since Asians have higher T from higher BMI (against the white norm), they’ll be more likely to get it. This also explains the gestational diabetes common in Asian women, especially if the baby is mixed.

https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/library/spotlights/diabetes-asian-americans.html

Nationwide, as many as 1 in 4 people who have diabetes don’t know they have it. But for Asian Americans, that number is much higher—1 in 2, the highest of all ethnic/racial groups. Why aren’t more getting diagnosed?

Weebs do not mention this. If your apparent rationale for avoiding fat white women is avoiding the Diabeetus genes, Asian is then categorically the worst racial group to mix with.

1 in 2, flip a coin, rice cooker.

I bet it’s higher in the women due to sweet tooth, so likely worse.

But people of Asian descent have less muscle and more fat than other groups and often develop diabetes at a younger age and lower weight. That extra body fat tends to be in the belly (visceral fat). This isn’t the “inch you can pinch,” the fat stored just under the skin. Visceral fat is out of sight, wrapped around organs deep in the body. You can’t tell how much visceral fat someone has by looking at them.

I didn’t call them skinny-fat to be mean, they really are!

Visceral fat is also sometimes known as “active” fat because it drives certain processes in the body that can increase the risk for heart disease, stroke, and other serious health conditions. Everybody has some visceral fat, but having too much is a major risk factor for developing type 2 diabetes.

….But BMI doesn’t catch Asian Americans in the normal weight range (18.5 to 24.9) who may very well have too much visceral fat and be at risk for type 2 diabetes. Researchers are now suggesting that people of Asian heritage get tested if their BMI is 23 or greater. Type 2 diabetes can be prevented or delayed, but only if people know they’re at risk and can take action!

They need a totally different (lower) testing standard, but they’re just like us, guys! Nay, SUPERIOR!

The same volume food in a smaller body, this isn’t hard to figure out. They’re not white women, eating like us makes them FAT.

re preggers diabetus-

https://www.sutterhealth.org/health/south-asian/womens/gestational-diabetes

Pregnant South Asian women carry a higher risk for developing gestational diabetes, a condition that’s dangerous for both mother and child. Between 2 and 10 percent of all pregnancies each year are complicated by gestational diabetes

2-10% in which demographic? Sounds like all? I bet it’s higher in certain ones, isn’t it?

Under risk factors is basically – be non-white

  • Being of Hispanic, Native American, African-American, Asian-American or Pacific Islander descent.

Women who have had gestational diabetes have a 20 to 50 percent chance of developing diabetes in the 5 to 10 years following pregnancy.

Mother Nature is a bitch.

Specific study on Asian women-

https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/24/5/955

so healthy, much fitness

Our data indicate that although the historical or clinical risk factors for GDM are valid in Asians, using risk factors alone to select such patients for testing for GDM is inadequate. Many Asian women who develop GDM have no risk factors at all.

When Natural Selection hates you so much… maybe give it up?

r-types have higher numbers of issues like this, that would be fatal under natural law

They don’t ‘choose’ to stop at 1-2 kids, it isn’t ‘culture’, it’s fear (see below).

To avoid overlooking significant numbers of women with GDM, one may lower the specificity of the criteria, but this requires that the majority of patients be tested.

wow, that bad

Logistically, it is much simpler to conduct universal screening for all Asian women in Western countries, rather than to apply selective testing in order to spare a small percentage of women from being tested. Therefore, our findings strongly support recommendations for universal screening for GDM in pregnant women of Asian origin in Western countries. However, in places where the incidence of GDM is low, such as in some developing countries, the selection of patients for testing by the risk factors may be reasonable.

just like us, huh?

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/923661

has a bloody paywall, nevermind, still linking

Introduction: Asian women have a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus than women of other races/ethnicities. We aimed to compare the prevalence of gestational diabetes among Asian American women to other racial/ethnic groups and explore whether the higher occurrence of the disorder among Asian women can be explained by acculturation.

Clearly I am making this all up to feel better, right guys?

Why hide this one behind a paywall, hmm?

https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2019/19_0212.htm

It is also here.

Results

Among the 5,562 women studied, the weighted prevalence of gestational diabetes was 15.5% among Asian American women, followed by 9.0% among non-Hispanic black women, 10.7% among Hispanic women, and 7.9% among non-Hispanic white women.

15.5% v. 7.9%

Diabetes at DOUBLE the rate of whites!

DOUBLE!

but they’re just like us

2.44x the risk

and that’s controlled, independently

Compared with non-Hispanic white women, Asian women had 2.44 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.81–3.29; P < .001) times the odds of having gestational diabetes, independent of maternal age, education, marital status, income, prenatal care adequacy, prepregnancy BMI, and physical activity. Acculturation was negatively associated with having gestational diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86–0.99) and explained 15.9% (95% CI, 11.38%–25.08%; P < .001) of the association between Asian race and the condition.

About 85% genetic. Great odds.

Conclusion

We found that Asian race was an independent risk factor for gestational diabetes, and higher acculturation may play a protective role against it in Asian American women.

In Summary

What is already known about this topic?

Asian women have a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus than women of other races. However, little data exist on why prevalence is highest among Asian women.

I sense genetics.

If they’re having unnatural babies (too large for their race, mixed) supported by modern medicine, they’d be more likely to die anyway, right? Medicine can only do so much. Weaker genes die a la Darwin.

The biggest r-select factor would be risk of death while breeding, that would be the surest thing. The genes trying to extinct themselves.

Does this data exist? Also for the neonates?

YOU BET IT DOES.

Let’s see the weebs explain away these studies. They’ll probably just ignore me… again.

Go ahead. Ignore your baby and waifu’s graves?

https://www.ajmc.com/view/racial-disparities-persist-in-maternal-morbidity-mortality-and-infant-health

Pregnancy related mortality can be defined as death of the mother during pregnancy, delivery, or within one year postpartum. While 700 pregnancy-related deaths occur each year, 2/3 of these deaths are considered to be preventable.

Modern medicine, dysgenic again.

Overall pregnancy related mortality in the United States occurs at an average rate of 17.2 deaths per 100,000 live births. However, that number jumps to 43.5/100,000 for non-Hispanic Black women and decreases to 12.7/100,000 for non-Hispanic white women and 11/100,000 for Hispanic women.

No data listed for Asian, odd?

For mothers of all backgrounds, leading causes of death include cardiovascular conditions, hemorrhage, and infection. However, for non-Hispanic Black women, leading causes of death include cardiovascular conditions in addition to cardiomyopathy, pre-eclampsia, and eclampsia (hypertensive disorders).

Non-Hispanic Black women are also significantly more likely to have a severe maternal morbidity (SMM) event at the time of delivery. For every maternal death there are 70 cases of SMM events that are considered “near misses.” These events can have long-term or short-term consequences to a woman’s health. Over the past 20 years, cases of SMM have increased by over 200%, while cases disproportionately affect Black women. One study found Black women experienced SMM at a rate 2.1 times greater than that of white women.

To better understand and address these disparities, researchers suggest providers increase screening for social determinants of health. Levels of stress, trauma, food insecurity, neighborhood violence, and access to prenatal care are all factors that may contribute to the disparities and warrant further investigation.

Although most maternal deaths result from cardiovascular and hypertensive disorders, researchers found Asian/Pacific Island women exhibit the highest prevalence of gestational diabetes, which can increase pregnancy complications, at 14.8%.

One study presented in the session focused on behavioral interventions and protective factors among women with gestational diabetes. A Kaiser Permanente analysis of women in northern California found Black women have a lower prevalence of gestational diabetes when compared with Asian Indian, Filipina, Southeast Asian and Chinese women. White women had the lowest rates of the disease overall.

Screening for postpartum diabetes is recommended to all women within 4 to 12 weeks postpartum. However, rates of screening vary among women with different racial and ethnic backgrounds, suggesting tailored strategies to reduce risk and improve healthcare behaviors may be effective.

Racial medicine, openly.

An additional study explored how racial and ethnic disparities impact severe neonatal morbidities, specifically among very preterm children (born <32 weeks of gestation). Preterm birth has been associated with several health conditions developing later in life, including diabetes.

Presenter Teresa Janevic, PhD, defined race as “linked to phenotype and /or ancestry that indexes one’s location on the US social hierarchy of socially constructed groupings (i.e., races) that has been based primarily on skin color.”

genes aren’t social

Africans in Africa also have the same ‘risk’ as one in America. No magic dirt.

In contrast, Janevic defined ethnicity as “tied to race and used both to distinguish diverse populations and to establish personal or group identity, usually based on shared culture or beliefs.”

Culture? Belief? Believe your way out of diabetes. I’ll wait.

In a population-based retrospective cohort analysis using hospital discharge data linked with vital statistics at birth and death records, researchers determined Black infants were at the highest risk of dying within less than 28 days after discharge, or suffering neonatal morbidities in the time between birth and discharge. Black infants were followed by Hispanic infants, while white and Asian infants had similar low risks.

We’ll see about that.

Of the 39 New York City hospitals included in the study, researchers found a 6-fold difference in risk of combined mortality and morbidity outcomes. “Black infants were at twice the risk of being at a hospital that has risk-adjusted high rates of combined mortality and morbidity,” Janevic noted, while Hispanic infants had a 1.5 increased risk to receive care from one of these hospitals. “Hospital quality where women of color deliver likely contributes to these disparities,” she concluded.

Like schools, it depends on the IQ of the people working there.

Another investigation detailed how environmental factors and population level exposures impact disparities in preterm birth and infant mortality. “Non-Hispanic Black infants compared with non-Hispanic white infants have twice the risk of death in the first year,” explained presenter Heather Burris, MD. “This is particularly striking because Black infants just make up 15% of all births in the United States but are counting for 29% of all deaths.”

no comment

Among causes of infant death, preterm birth and low birth weight related death, along with pregnancy complications, account for the highest racial and ethnic disparities between non-Hispanic Black and white infants. Black infants are also significantly more likely to be born preterm than white infants.

an r-factor unless twins

Researchers note genetics and education level have very little impact in accounting for disparities in preterm birth. Although women with higher education tend to have lower preterm birth rates, Black women who graduated from college have a higher risk of preterm birth than white women who dropped out of high school.

so, racial

I’m so glad white people already survived multiple genetic purges in our history.

Through analyzing delivery data and creating models based on air pollution severity in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, investigators discovered air pollution is associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Data also show Black Americans experience consistently higher exposure to air pollutants, measured in fine particulate matter (PM)2.5.

An additional analysis between preterm birth and nationwide neighborhood deprivation index (encompassing income below the poverty level, vacant homes, education levels, among other factors) found that Black women experience neighborhood deprivation exposure at almost 2 standard deviations (SDs) higher than white women in Philadelphia.

Overall, Black women are 4 times more likely to live in a neighborhood with high violent crime and high air pollution than white women. “When we look at preterm birthweights, we can see that it is women living in these high-high neighborhoods that have the highest risk of preterm birth,” Burris said. However, these associations were consistent regardless of race.

so non-sig

They gestate for less time than whites, this is known. Africans in Africa do it.

Now we’ve established some things. An r-study in Asian women.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28099290/

Increased Perinatal Morbidity and Mortality Among Asian American and Pacific Islander Women in the United States

Background: Asian American/Pacific Islanders (AAPIs) are the fastest-growing racial group in the United States.

America is now owned by Asia, demographically.

Despite a higher socioeconomic status, AAPI women experience higher rates of maternal morbidity and mortality.

can’t pay your way out of r-genes

if controlled for SES, aka $, their data would be even worse

Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of women who were hospitalized for delivery from 2002 to 2013. The primary outcome variable was inpatient mortality rate, and the presence of severe maternal morbidities was estimated using the Bateman Comorbidity Index, a validated tool for predicting obstetric morbidity.

Results: AAPI women presenting for delivery between 2003 and 2012 were older, more likely to reside in a zip code in the top quartile of annual income, be privately insured than Caucasian women,

so oppressed

where’s Asian privilege?

and less likely to have a higher Bateman Comorbidity Index. However, AAPI women had a higher likelihood of postpartum hemorrhage (3.4% vs 2.7%, P < .001), uterine atony, severe perineal lacerations, and severe maternal morbidities. Procedures such as transfusion, hysterectomy,

So they could have one kid and die, have one kid and have that die, OR have one kid and then their organs all removed – so no more kids?

Yes clearly our biological superiors, right weebs? Totally not rationalising a fetish, are we?

I wonder why one child was law? They don’t have a culture of many kids because they’re too r-select to survive without modern medicine. Wake up. They pretend 1-2 is a choice and that’s why they mock and envy large white families (3+ standard) like the Amish. They envy us that ability. They would die.

and mechanical ventilation were also more common in AAPI women.

Calling it – Mother Nature is anti-Asian.

Furthermore, AAPI women had a higher mortality rate that persisted despite adjustment for an apparently higher income and comorbidities (odds ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-2.59, P = .01).

Conclusions: Despite having a higher socioeconomic status, AAPI women had higher rates of maternal mortality during hospitalization for delivery. This increase persisted even after adjustment for factors known to affect peripartum outcomes. Further investigation is needed to better clarify the causes of racial differences in maternal morbidity and mortality.

D.N.A.

Science says –

If you want to survive childbirth – be white.

Almost like we evolved to during the Ice Age.

Almost….

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29752934/

Results: A total of 360,370 women with postpartum hemorrhage from 2012 to 2014 were included in this analysis. Risk for severe morbidity was significantly higher among non-Hispanic black women (26.6%) than non-Hispanic white, Hispanic, or Asian or Pacific Islander women (20.7%, 22.5%, and 21.4%, respectively, P < .01).

The white is 20%, Asian is 21%.

And these are the fattest white people, like, ever.

White and Asian bolded-

For non-Hispanic black compared with non-Hispanic white, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander women risk was higher for disseminated intravascular coagulation (8.4% vs 7.1%, 6.8%, and 6.8%, respectively, P < .01) and transfusion (19.4% vs 13.9%, 16.1%, and 15.8%, respectively, P < .01). Black women were also more likely than non-Hispanic white women to undergo hysterectomy (2.4% vs 1.9%, P < .01), although Asian or Pacific Islander women were at highest risk (2.9%). Adjusting for comorbidity, black women remained at higher risk for severe morbidity (P < .01). Risk for death for non-Hispanic black women was significantly higher than for nonblack women (121.8 per 100,000 deliveries, 95% confidence interval, 94.7-156.8 vs 24.1 per 100,000 deliveries, 95% confidence interval, 19.2-30.2, respectively, P < .01).

The weebs either did 1. no research (typical gammas) or 2. they’re delusional.

Almost double the risk of hysterectomy, roughly. An additional 52% risk over white women, minimum, in just this study.

What’s the point of being married to them, at that point? Their baby machine is broken.

https://www.minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=4&lvlid=53

Infant Mortality and Asian Americans

Yes, we’re going there.

  • Asian American infants are 40 percent more likely to die from maternal complications as compared to non-Hispanic white mothers.

They have boy hips, duh.

For such a small segment of the population, their numbers shouldn’t be so high.

It doesn’t discuss mixed kids, I wonder why?

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2019/p0905-racial-ethnic-disparities-pregnancy-deaths.html

  • Non-Hispanic black (black) and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women experienced higher PRMRs (40.8 and 29.7, respectively) than all other racial/ethnic populations (white PRMR was 12.7, Asian/ Pacific Islander PRMR was 13.5 and Hispanic PRMR was 11.5).  This was 3.2 and 2.3 times higher than the PRMR for white women – and the gap widened among older age groups.

https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/news-events/features/community-health/causes-asian-american-mortality.html

Racial medicine.

Notably, we found that, when aggregated, the top cause of death among Asian Americans is cancer. However, when disaggregated, there is wide variation in the leading cause of death. For instance, for Asian Indians, nearly twice as many men die of heart disease (31 percent), compared to cancer (18 percent). In contrast, for Koreans, the opposite is true — the death rate for cancer (34 percent) is much higher than the death rate for heart disease (19 percent).

Remember the breast cancer and Asian BMI/testosterone stuff?

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-03-excess-hormones-condition-women.html

Research led by the University of Birmingham has found that increased levels of hormones including testosterone could cause a brain condition that can lead to blindness in women.

We are all jealous of your waifu, yes.

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension—also known as IIH—is caused by  in the brain with consequences from blindness to incapacitating daily long-term headaches. IIH was originally identified over 100 years ago yet the cause of the condition has remained unknown although there has been much speculation about why more than 95 per cent of total incidence is in  with obesity.

And Asians, they’re 1/2 obese in America!

Lucky you.

 They then compared the results with the levels observed in women with obesity of the same age and body mass index (BMI), as well as a cohort of women with  (PCOS).

PCOS is far more common in Asians. Look it up.

Most notable were the high levels of the androgen ‘testosterone’ found in the blood in IIH women. Crucially, levels of androgens were uniquely increased in the brain fluid (CSF) of women with IIH. When the researchers, analysed human choroidal plexus tissue, which is the site in the brain where CSF is produced, they confirmed that androgens could increase the rate of CSF secretion, a potential driver for increased brain pressure.

Brain damage. How sexy.

re PCOS

https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jog.14132

On the other hand, South Asian women with PCOS, the region comprising the Indian subcontinent and surrounding countries, are known to have a higher degree of hirsutism…

sexy

Asian women with PCOS were more likely to have diabetes compared with Caucasian patients, suggesting they also have metabolic complications. 

Genetic components play important roles in the pathogenesis of PCOS,

Do their dodgy hormones make South Asians partially infertile?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17367914/

Yes. Yes they do.

Results: We found that the South Asian women presented at a younger age for the management of sub-fertility. An extended stimulation phase and Caucasian ethnicity showed an inverse correlation with the number of oocytes retrieved in the PCOS subgroup. Caucasian ethnicity was associated with a higher fertilization rate however increase in body mass index (BMI) and the laboratory technique of IVF appeared to have a negative impact on fertilization rates in the PCOS subgroup. Commencing down regulation on day 1 of the cycles was negatively associated with fertilization rates in the tubal group. In terms of clinical pregnancy rates, the Caucasian PCOS had a 2.5 times (95% CI: 1.25-5) higher chance of an ongoing clinical pregnancy as compared with their Asian counterpart. Also, a unit increase in the basal FSH concentration reduced the odds of pregnancy by 18.6% (95% CI: 1.8-32.6%) in the PCOS group.

Conclusions: The Asian PCOS have a greater sensitivity to gonadotropin stimulation with lower fertilization and ongoing clinical pregnancy rates as compared with their Caucasian counterparts.

White women win again.

https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/3893977

testosterone levels were higher in PCOS cases than in controls (P = 0.008 and 0.003, respectively).

But IVF, right? WRONG

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/08/160818212907.htm

The ethnicity of women undergoing fertility treatments like IVF can affect the rate of successful live births, according to new research. After adjusting for certain factors including age of patient at time of treatment, cause of female or male infertility, and type of treatment, the study found that White Irish, South Asian Indian, South Asian Bangladeshi, South Asian Pakistani, Black African, and Other Asian women had a significantly lower odds of a live birth than White British women.

White women, still winning. Thank God for the Ice Age.

https://www.thefreelibrary.com/A+study+of+association+of+sex+hormones+with+insulin+resistance+and…-a0509015581

Overall, studies have shown higher testosterone levels in women and lower levels in men are related to incident diabetes. The major risk factors contributing to diabetes are biochemical, environmental, sedentary lifestyle, socioeconomic status and genetic factors. All of them together or independently are responsible for the development of the DM. [3] Besides, certain studies show Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) is more common in females than males independent of age. [4]

https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-018-2131-4

We found a high prevalence of GDM among the Asian population. Asian women with common risk factors especially among those with history of previous GDM, congenital anomalies or macrosomia should receive additional attention from physician as high-risk cases for GDM in pregnancy.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14763914/

 In the post-menopausal group, estrogens, testosterone and androstenedione increased with increasing BMI. 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513814000026

Let’s look at objective hotness!

Body mass index (BMI) was a very strong negative predictor of body attractiveness ratings, similar to previous findings. Zero-order associations between women’s mean hormone concentrations and mean attractiveness ratings were not significant; however, after controlling for BMI, attractiveness ratings were independently and positively associated with both estradiol and testosterone concentrations. Discussion focuses on the implications of these findings for whether attractiveness assessment mechanisms are specialized for the detection of cues of differential fecundity in young women’s bodies.

High T = ugly!

Did I mention water is wet? Can they seriously accuse of cherry picking? I’m not even looking hard.

Prior research has provided evidence that large breast size and low waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) are positively associated with women’s estrogen and progesterone concentrations,

Previously covered WHR, use search bar. Asians lose. Even black women do better.

Click to access ethnic-testosterone1.pdf

Asians have way more T as a race than Europeans, get over it. Historically, we considered them savages, less civilized, for that reason. How is this surprising? Do you think we colonised India for fun? It’s obvious in the broad manjaws, duh. Marquardt covered this. Anyone can do a replication study, but I suggest you include the women too, so it isn’t just a sexual effect but race.

From a blog “East Asians were found to have the highest average total plasma testosterone (5,673 ρg/mL) followed by Africans (5,442 ρg/mL) and then Europeans (4,992 ρg/mL). Given that the sample size for Africans is smaller (N < 10,000), their relative position may change with more data. Nonetheless, the claim that East Asians have the least testosterone is not supported by scientific data. “

Yeah, fake redpills who think T = manly, good thing. It’s just a hormone.

“There is no way of accurately determining free testosterone. Even if there was, this would also be irrelevant since bio-availability is prime. Since race realists use total serum testosterone, why is this an issue?”

true, it’s just applying the same standard

Culturally, gang rape is more normal in Asia than Africa. This is why. You don’t get African Taharrush, really. Asia has Eve Teasing and the like. Trust me, you don’t want this.

“Mass sexual assault is the collective sexual assault of women, and sometimes children, in public by groups of unrelated men. Typically acting under the protective cover of large gatherings, victims have reported being groped, stripped, beaten, bitten, penetrated and raped.”

As for the contention that there are no studies indicating a 10% difference between East Asians and Europeans, I did find one age controlled study where the Chinese sample had 8.8% more total T, 11.4% more bio-available T and 12% more free T than the European sample. The Japanese sample had 10.5%, 5.1% and 6.7% more than Europeans respectively [Wu et al. 1995]. Wonder if race realists discuss this study, or perhaps they are too busy in celebratory dance around the Korean/Swede campfire?

They’re not really redpill. I believe data even if I dislike it. Asians have high T as a race. Get over it.

High T can also dovetail with lower national IQs e.g. India, so…. why want this? Low IQ nations have more crime.

Additionally, this recent study shows HK Chinese having some 3% more bio-available T than US Europeans.

Lol, he’s right. But T isn’t a good thing. It’s just a hormone, in men or women.

Being a race realists seems to be a length engagement with delusion, fantasy and ‘scientific’ homo-erotica.

Not here, son. I believe the T-data. Penis size generally correlates to racial height (in white men), not really T. Forum bros are wrong again. Penis stuff is sexual selection, aka chosen by women.

https://www.pnas.org/content/110/17/6925

There was a similar increase in the positive effect of penis size on attractiveness with a more masculine body shape (i.e., greater shoulder-to-hip ratio). Surprisingly, larger penis size and greater height had almost equivalent positive effects on male attractiveness. Our results support the hypothesis that female mate choice could have driven the evolution of larger penises in humans. More broadly, our results show that precopulatory sexual selection can play a role in the evolution of genital traits.

It’s even subracial (national male height).

https://www.penissizes.org/average-penis-size-ethnicity-race-and-country

I appreciate the skin tone joke in this graphic.

But if you go by nation, and percentage of height....

https://www.worlddata.info/average-penissize.php

So according to this, hate the French!

Surprised Croatians rank so low.

https://journals.lww.com/humanandrology/Fulltext/2011/08000/Relationship_between_penile_size_and_body.4.aspx

It was concluded that all penile measurements are interrelated to each other; the height and weight also the other body measurements that are related to the penile measurements in less than 50%. It seems that the penile measurements are polygenic traits and are under multifactorial influences.

Not T.

https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(00)01723-4/pdf

There are racial differences in associations of hormone levels with age and BMI in late
reproductive age women. Further study is needed to replicate these findings and to determine the relationships of these hormonal associations with menopausal symptoms

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2888623/

Obesity is an important factor in hormone dynamics independent of age, race and smoking in mid-life women, although the mechanisms remain unclear.

From “A Study of the Correlation of Some Sex Hormone with Obesity in Women with Secondary Infertility” (google it)

Infertility is the inability to conceive a child for more than one year. The present study indicates
that the obesity associated with infertility. The aim of the study to determine follicle stimulating
hormone, luteinizing hormone, testosterone hormone and prolactin levels. and cholesterol and
triglyceride concentration in 2nd inferetid women. This study was carried out at kamal al-samaarai
hospital the data were collected from 95 secondary infertilial women were age between 16-45 years
old and grouped them in to obese (n = 46) and non obese(n = 49). There was no significant
difference between the two groups (p <0.05). Body mass index in Infertile obese women is slightly
higher than non obese Infertile women which is statistically significant (P<0.001). However LH,
TSH, cholesterol and triglyceride concentration in obese infertile women is significantly higher than
non obese infertile women (p >0.05).The BMI was correlated positively with triglyceride in obese
group while BMI was positive correlation highly significant with cholesterol in non obese group.
Regression analysis revealed obese to be strongly associated with observed infertility. The elevated
prolactin values in secondary infertile women clearly shows that there is a mechanism operating at
the anterior pituitary level which shows an abnormal distribution of FSH and LH which may further
explain the abnormal delay ovum maturation. This study also indicates obese associated with
infertile more than non obese women.

So, there’s a lot going on.

Explains the Asian fitness influencer rise (Asian body fat)

TLDR Asians carry more fat than whites (in America, at least).

https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/72/3/694/4729363
Well yeah, the junk food and spices diet is hell on the hormones too. They evolved for multiple famines (especially the Chinese and Indians) so they tend to weight-gain like that, too. Fat deposition isn’t the same between race (black thighs/’ass’) so why would accumulation patterns and proclivity to gain work like that either?

Results: A convenient sample of 1626 adults with BMIs ≤35 was evaluated. Independent percentage body fat predictor variables in multiple regression models included 1/BMI, sex, age, and ethnic group (R values from 0.74 to 0.92 and SEEs from 2.8 to 5.4% fat). The prediction formulas were then used to prepare provisional healthy percentage body fat ranges based on published BMI limits for underweight (<18.5), overweight (≥25), and obesity (≥30).

Conclusion: This proposed approach and initial findings provide the groundwork and stimulus for establishing international healthy body fat ranges.

But they’re not the same. Bio-logically.

 

The Asian ‘gym girls’ also trying to pass off the manjaw as ‘gains’ by matching on the stomach and thighs, I’ve seen white lawyer types do the same. Do NOT fall for it, men. If the jaw is square and broad as a child and pre-teen, RUN.


The small, squat (squarish) skeleton and pedomorphic features of the Asian race (historically, accurately called Mongoloid if you can search for it in anthropology) already pre-dispose their young people (teens) to lower BMI anyway, so the ‘losing weight’ excuse is bullshit, they’re building muscle to match the jaw and trap some sucker with their high T and bad temper. This lower BMI is not a consequence of health (dietary or genetic) so compared to the unhealthiest white people EVER (sorry America) they still have higher BMIs. HOW.

White women have a naturally high BMI (taller, curves) so it’s actually worse than it looks. The effect is maintained in every age group, how can one fuck up age 20? Any 20yo complaining about their metabolism needs a slap.
The fat Asian hypothesis also holds true within the race, compared the Asian men to women matching age.


IF ONLY THE MANOSPHERE ACTUALLY READ THE DATA.
Every other claim about Asians it’s like [citation needed] yet when I go to look…. they lied.
I expected the one claim the weebs consistently made about Asians in America (being thin) must be true but … no.

18.5 is a terrible BMI cut-off because it includes anorexics, smokers, druggies and petite women all in one. Women look wildly different at low and too-low body fats, which also varies by race. At the same BMI, Asians look more husky because the skeleton is squared-off. They’re also likelier to lay down fat than muscle.

The Asians are larger than white women pre-menopause, what EXCUSE is there?
The only time whites actually have slightly higher BMIs (ever so slightly) is in the elderly range (60-79, at which point yeah you’re excused, you can go).
I’m seeing through the model minority propaganda and there’s nothing to it.
Rule #1 of moving to America – DON’T GET FAT. YOU HAD ONE JOB.

“In contrast, models for Asians predicted a different percentage body fat from that predicted for African Americans and whites. “

That’s code for ‘they evolved so much for famine that we had to invent new maths to count it’.

“For example, Deurenberg et al (35) found that American blacks had a 1.3-unit lower and Polynesians a 4.5-unit higher BMI than whites with the same body fatness (35). Even within the white cohort, the investigators observed small differences between Americans and Europeans.”

Asian placement is denser. Squat Mongoloid skeleton, anthropologically. If you disagree, it’s cope.

Americans are mixed white, generally, that’s why. German/French hybrids and other nonsense. You lose adaptive advantage from your subrace too.

They studied one of the thinnest types of Asians (japs) so I guarantee you others would be worse.

“The underlying causes of ethnic variation in relations between BMI and percentage body fat are likely due to small between-center body fat measurement differences and biological between-group differences (35).”

“The evaluation of Asians was confined to Japan and that of African Americans to the United States. Therefore, the underlying causes of observed ethnic differences in terms of measurement, environmental, and genetic factors are difficult to ascertain. Nevertheless, it appears evident that a single set of universal percentage body fat ranges cannot be easily developed without considerable additional analysis of this problem. Our equations and associated tables provide several ethnic-specific ranges as working guidelines. Because African Americans and whites differed only slightly in percentage body fat (by 1–2%) after BMI was first controlled for, we presented a combined equation (Equation 5) and table (Table 4) based on 4C percentage body fat for these 2 groups.”

That’s right, our fat deposition is more alike blacks than Asians. That’s how different the races are.

In a study surprising no one, high BMI also predicts depression.
http://www.psypost.org/2018/01/study-finds-high-body-mass-index-predicts-increases-depressive-symptoms-50586
Because depression is caused by INFLAMMATION, it’s an inflammatory condition!
The visceral fat is causing it, not the subcutaneous (which you need to live and is important for a woman’s hormones, gym girls are a mess).
So the #fitspo girls eating junk are STILL ‘depressed’ and on SSRIs.

So pleasant waifu disposition goes out the window.

Why bother?

For further proof of the famine-evolved rice farmer genes.
https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/93/5/1168S/4597892

Background: Asians who have a healthy body mass index (BMI) range have been observed to have higher levels of obesity and risk of cardiovascular disease than whites, which suggests that the relation between BMI and adiposity may be different for Asians.

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the influence of childhood and adolescent exposure to a westernized environment on the relation between BMI and percentage body fat in young Asian American women.

So no, this isn’t their age. No cope here son.

Design: Secondary data from 129 Asian women, aged 20–25 y, with variable lengths of residence in the United States and 327 white women of comparable ages who had participated in the Latina and Asian Bone Health Study (1999–2000) and the Berkeley Bone Health Study (1998–2000), respectively, were analyzed by using multiple linear regression with percentage body fat as the outcome variable and place of birth, ethnicity, length of US residency, and BMI as predictor variables.

Results: Asians who lived in the United States <12 y showed the same relation between BMI and percentage body fat as did whites. In contrast, Asians who had lived in the United States ≥12 y had higher percentage body fat than did whites for BMIs (in kg/m2) <20.5 and lower percentage body fat for BMIs in the overweight and obese range.

Responding to the same stimuli wildly differently > genetic!

They’re more likely skinny-fat, aka fatal fat.

Whites evolved to eat Roman grains like processed wheat.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that childhood environments may influence the relation between BMI and adiposity. Research is warranted on the role that childhood environments play in the accumulation and distribution of body fat and hence metabolic disease risk later in life.

There’s still a huge difference in the same environment.

Asians with more years in the United States had higher mean percentage body fat than did whites at low BMIs and lower mean percentage body fat at high BMIs with the regression lines intersecting at BMI ≈20.5 and body fat of 26.5%.

THANK YOU.

Again, Magic Dirt isn’t real. Enjoy your BBW Ting Tong for your golden years.

We are supremely jealous.

Asian-immigrant adults who were living in North America were observed to have higher adiposity levels

translation: chunkier

at the same BMI level than did whites (6). However, most of the Asian-immigrant adults studied were raised outside of North America. To our knowledge, our study was among the first studies to observe a difference in how BMI relates to percentage body fat between Asian Americans who had spent more years of childhood in the United States compared with Asian Americans who were minimally exposed to the United States during childhood and adolescence.

Lesson for weebs – do NOT move the Thai bride to America.

Stay in Asia or do NOT bother. She WILL get fat. You have been warned.

American-born Asians had a higher percentage of mothers with college degrees (59% of mothers compared with 37% of mothers in foreign-born Asians and 32% of mothers in whites).

Fat SJWs, great catch!

in our study, which suggested that obesity rates in our sample of Asians were likely lower than in the general population.

They admit it.

Is the general observation that, at the same BMI level, Asians have higher total body fat and visceral fat and higher risk of cardiovascular disease risk than do whites applicable to Asians in general,

yes

or is this observation applicable only to Asians living in Asian societies? If the latter, does the environment during early life influence how body fat accumulates and distributes and, therefore, affects the relation between BMI and body fat? How strong a predictor of child growth and body composition is socioeconomic background and, in particular, the mother’s education? Are our findings also applicable to men?

We concluded that the early life environment may influence the relation between BMI and adiposity in later life. In particular, we speculated that Asian women substantially exposed to the American environment early in life exhibited different patterns of accumulation of body fat than did Asian women raised in Asia;

non-sig, see above

these differences may be partially attributable to environmental and lifestyle factors that affected diet and physical activity. For example, compared with Asian children raised in the United States, children who live in Asia tend to spend more time studying, whether in school or at home, and less time doing sports and engaging in recreational activities (25). In the past, diets of Asians raised in Asia also tended to be different, with a lower consumption of breakfast cereals, dairy products, and processed meats, than diets of Asians raised in the United States (26).

Yes, they do try to eat white. Silly Asians, didn’t evolve for dairy.

So your grandkids will definitely be fat, even if she isn’t by some fluke? Great, very likely to pass on your genome.

What a waste of time and resources.

However, with the rapid changes that have been taking place in Asian economies and the globalization of the food supply, we expect to see further changes in the diets of children in Asia (27) and, consequently, in body composition.

The understanding of how childhood environments influence the relation between BMI and percentage body fat has implications for the use of BMI as a screening indicator for obesity and obesity-related conditions. In addition, research to understand the influence of environmental factors on the accumulation and distribution of total body fat and metabolically active visceral fat during critical life stages will add insight into the use of clinically relevant screening tools for chronic disease risk.

Plan on growing old together, spending a loooong time with fatass.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25294681/

In this observational study with a short follow-up of elderly Asian people, higher amounts of visceral fat, a marker for central obesity, were associated with decreased all-cause mortality.

South Asian v White men

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1950568/

Objective

South Asians are susceptible to insulin resistance even without obesity. We examined the characteristics of body fat content, distribution and function in South Asian men and their relationships to insulin resistance compared to Caucasians.

so no, you can’t tell by ‘looking at her’, your norms are informed by white women

Research Design and Methods

Twenty-nine South Asian and 18 Caucasian non-diabetic men (age 27±3 and 27±3 years, respectively) underwent euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp for insulin sensitivity, underwater weighing for total body fat, MRI of entire abdomen for intraperitoneal (IP) and subcutaneous abdominal (SA) fat and biopsy of SA fat for adipocyte size.

Results

Compared to Caucasians, in spite of similar BMI, South Asians had higher total body fat (22±6 and 15±4% of body weight; p-value<0.0001), higher SA fat (3.5±1.9 and 2.2±1.3 kg, respectively; p-value = 0.004), but no differences in IP fat (1.0±0.5 and 1.0±0.7 kg, respectively; p-value = 0.4). SA adipocyte cell size was significantly higher in South Asians (3491±1393 and 1648±864 µm2; p-value = 0.0001) and was inversely correlated with both glucose disposal rate (r-value = −0.57; p-value = 0.0008) and plasma adiponectin concentrations (r-value = −0.71; p-value<0.0001). Adipocyte size differences persisted even when SA was matched between South Asians and Caucasians.

Marry those genes, go ahead.

Conclusions

Insulin resistance in young South Asian men can be observed even without increase in IP fat mass and is related to large SA adipocytes size. Hence ethnic excess in insulin resistance in South Asians appears to be related more to excess truncal fat and dysfunctional adipose tissue than to excess visceral fat.

in the men

harsh to call a racial adaptation to famine ‘dysfunctional’

never go full Tom Cruise

Asians are even lying about their height now (video here).

https://www.bizzoby.com/product/invisible-height-increased-insoles/

I love how on the website it says suitable for “Wedding”. That’s false advertising. Imagine how sexy taking that off would be on the wedding night. “Wait, sweetheart, I must remove my silicon stilts! No take backsies!”

Never reproduce with a secret manlet (or womanlet) because your demon spawn WILL hate you and will become a Supreme Gentleman.

I’m done with all the Asian makeover stuff, can we just ban all of this? Even make-up, it’s not like I need it. I haven’t used mascara in years and eyelash extensions can make you blind. It involves putting formaldehyde (of autopsy fame) ON YOUR FACE.

Playdough noses and Aryan contacts, wtf.

The nostrils plugs though. That’s some dishonest signalling.