Importing misogyny

Anti-white misogyny only.

They just can’t admit it openly.

I no longer trust “right-wing” news reporters, especially alternatives, because they completely missed out this viral video as the true reason France simply began to enforce its harassment law.

Fine, you lie and omit like the left, I won’t trust you like the left.

It doesn’t even have to be sexual harassment, people have a right to walk down the street in peace. It isn’t a strip club and both parties know the attention is an insult. Nobody has a right to take up your time or get your response. We’ve all been eased into this with comedians being cunts and calling it ‘a prank’ or with charity people on the street, in the UK they can’t legally come up to you anymore actually, begging is illegal. As harassment. They can’t even shake those donation tins, it’s coercion. Nothing to do with sex, just basic respect.

These little cowards wouldn’t dare be aggressive in public to men, they pick on the weaker sex like an animal. Notice he chose a lone, thin woman, who clearly couldn’t physically defend herself.

Why don’t most women risk dressing up anymore? Femininity is punished.

The First World must enforce its standards of decency and oppose this American lechery.

Hollywood’s been teaching these people lies.

White people don’t exist to please you. 

White men won’t pay you, white women won’t flirt with you. We don’t want you here, nobody asked you to come here.

State sponsored assault

She followed the libertarian playbook.

What if they filmed it too?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-45439954

They didn’t even follow their own rules for step-by-step nudity. Surely any forced nudity is illegal exposure?

Like there’s no basic human right to modesty? Dignity? You could just run them over with a metal scanner if you’re “concerned” about “weapons”. Police have no right to punish with sexual degradation.

Humiliation, groping, fondling, imagine this happening to a religious person.

Could even happen to virgins.

Think of the trauma.

You can’t even grab a stripper at work legally.

Like women can’t assault other women?

This wasn’t even in 1984.

If elite military units were stripped out in the cold they still wouldn’t be groped, pinned down or fondled.

There’s even a disease risk from their hands if they didn’t wear gloves.

Police aren’t doctors and even doctors have to obtain consent WTF.

Comic: Assault and attention

No, it isn’t a witch hunt of alleged abusers because it isn’t one group, a collective, it’s only a temporary cluster that actually slots into guilty/innocent. A group would be abuse victims and statistically they make the bulk of accusers (liars of both sexes are rare and should be punished). A witch hunt requires the party is 100% innocent at all times. This is mostly European history so can Americans stop murdering our historical term. This English term doesn’t just mean scapegoat, it’s very loaded and again, even scapegoats if you look at the history, are blemish-free.

It isn’t just men, it isn’t just straight men and it isn’t just public figures.
That’s kind of the point here.
Anyone can be a victim, anyone can be an abuser. Is it anyone’s fault for the prevalence data? Only the abusers.

Should the courts handle it?

Yes.

Will they?

No.

Arbitration agreements aren’t meant to apply to criminal abuses but I’m sure some American will write it in.
It’s making headlines because it’s been known for a fact for many years.
That’s the shocking part. Should it be? No. It should’ve been carried to justice soon as it happened, but there’s no deadline on justice. There shouldn’t be. The victims, male/female, old/young, have to live with that. In the First World, we try not to let criminals get away with it because they’re rich and powerful (even niche industry power).

We have an opportunity to prove ourselves and predictably, the shallow internet narcissists are making it about them. You people make me sick.

There’s no way to win.

If you have a nervous breakdown, your testimony is crazy and can’t be trusted. (Sorry, are we under Sharia law?)
If you keep calm, you must be lying (that isn’t how body language or liars work, genius).
I would call them Freud wannabes but he was smart and actually over-diagnosed abuse because he had a soul, he had a mind to help and didn’t want to miss anyone in need.. They are technical bigots, not caring for the truth if it leaves a bitter taste. They’re always playing Cynic, the chronically miserable bring it on themselves.
Does theft cease to exist because of insurance scams?
Each case should be considered individually and anyone who thinks otherwise has no human compassion and can go to Hell. Gaslighting is itself a form of abuse and compassion isn’t one-sided. Could there be false accusations? Given the circumstances, no, and if so, the litigiousness of America will ensure they get plenty in a lawsuit plus extensive media coverage. It hasn’t happened because the only ones outed were open secrets, protected by their power. The story isn’t abuse, that’s sadly common; it’s the fact the beautiful people suffered it too.

Hardly the same as everyday assault but we assume celebrities are protected.

Sneering at them because they have something you want is low.

Be hopeful!

Any abuser can be brought to justice. This is great news for everyone.

It is also a good sign the gaslighters, presuming insanity of people they never met, are scared. They should be, there’s nowhere to hide their despicable games on people.

Stealthing obviously is a form of rape

Why don’t the sexes trust each other?

They shouldn’t, don’t trust any stranger.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/stealthing-man-take-off-condom-sex-no-consent-rape-sexual-assault-a7740611.html

Why do you think the internet is right?

Have you not bothered to look up the laws in your area?

Consent is very precise contractual law.

If she consents with a condom, and you remove the condom and proceed – that’s clearly rape.

Read the CPS guidelines (UK), it’s clearly non-consensual or they wouldn’t be trying to hide it.
That fact alone shows what they’re really up to.
You change something, you ask. And if they say no, you don’t do it.
That’s the verbal part in verbal consent.

There’s no maybe or if about this. And that’s a sign the law works because it protects people from unexpected sexual contact (non-consensual).

Giving something a kitsch little name doesn’t make it less creepy, it makes it moreso.

Notice they seem to want to spread their own STDs?

Why are so many young men retarded enough to consciously assume every woman is on the Pill at all times? [porn]

And that it works? [porn]

And ‘no trace’? It’s right up there with the PUA BS about ‘alpha STD protection’.

I’ve met more sexually literate children who’d balk at that.

Old joke: what do you call a man who uses the pull out method?

A father.

They don’t really enjoy the ‘way it feels’ or they’d get one of those innovative Fleshlights with all the weird and wonderful shapes.

They’re r-types, they enjoy the deceit.
They enjoy the rape.
Whether it’s at a conscious level or not, it’s a known r-selected breeding habit.

On a related note:

Men can’t even trust random women.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/sexual-assault-train-bus-public-transport-what-to-do-british-transport-police-a7718426.html

70 per cent of the offences reported to the British Transport Police are sexual assaults on women, 20 per cent are ‘outraging public decency’ (masturbation), six per cent exposure and two per cent sexual assault on men.

Sick bitches. Lock them up.

5 types of sexual coercion

A lot of men don’t realize that rapists often get a Yes on something else (foot in the door technique) then act like it means something else after the fact.

Just look at prison rape. You accept a free muffin at lunch, you’re later told you agreed to be their bed buddy.
That’s a male example of sexual coercion and men are rightfully terrified of it.

Coercion vitiates consent. It’s in the law, on the legal books.

https://www.bustle.com/articles/67926-is-it-rape-if-you-say-yes-5-types-of-sexual-coercion-explained

“You’re my wife/girlfriend, you are supposed to be having sex with me.”

A girlfriend owes you nothing.
A wife owes you something, but not constantly like a servant.

Many cultures teach us that sex is an inherent part of marriage. Many people take that a step further, and believe that being in a romantic relationship with someone makes you entitled to have sex with them.

They don’t believe that. Believing something doesn’t make it so. They’re lying to blackmail that person.

“You owe me” isn’t a belief.

The problem with that skewed thinking is that it leads some people to act as if taking on the label of “wife,” “girlfriend,” or “partner” suddenly makes your body their property.

I guess this relates to the idea of owning one another, which is true in a spiritual sense with spouses but doesn’t extend to constant entitlement, it relates to the idea that men always have to be up for it like robots and projects it onto the woman as her fault if he isn’t.

Unless you’re Catholic and never use contraception, it has nothing to do with Go forth and multiply, and has nothing to do with Christian duty. Prior to any duty, you should know what you’re agreeing to.

“If you don’t have sex with me, I’m breaking up with you.”

“If you don’t sleep with me, I’m going to sleep with someone else.”

“If you don’t sleep with me, I’m going to tell everyone you are a prude.”

In those cases it’s more obvious that nobody should be sleeping with them because they’re immature.

If Mommy won’t let me have the toy, I’m gonna smash it.

Attractive.

If they don’t respect your No, they don’t respect you or your body. Leave immediately. Run, don’t walk.

Logically, they shouldn’t respect a Yes either, if they doubt your ability to consent. Think about it.

What’s the subtextual thought process here?

You’re not allowed to say No to me.

ding ding crazy

run

whatsjwsimagine

Blackmail doesn’t apply to any agreement, including written contracts.

“If you really loved me, you would have sex with me.”

That isn’t love, that’s prostitution. A prostitute pays for things with sex.

“I wouldn’t have taken you out to dinner if I knew you were just leading me on. If you didn’t want to sleep with me, you shouldn’t have been flirting with me either.”

Again, (tends to be) male entitlement. Neither sex is owed sex.
That’s a non sequitur. If they didn’t want a date, they shouldn’t have asked for a date. That’s the real logic.

Don’t then complain that you thought (lie) it meant ‘something else’, like a ONS assuming it’s now a relationship. But that’s female entitlement, so they’d probably agree if the example isn’t close to home.

It is very easy for someone to try to ply you with alcohol as foreplay to a sexual encounter — because they know that if they can “relax” you enough, you may drop your resistance due to your impaired judgment, and agree to have sex. If your partner knows that you don’t want to have sex, and you find them repeatedly topping off your glass

that would be the point to tell them to go fuck themselves

If you find yourself saying yes to sex as a means to avoid harm, then there is no excuse for your partner’s behavior; please consider talking to someone and getting help.

The police, because sex is not a form of appeasement.

No seriously, many date rapists use these tactics because it gives them more plausible deniability in court later.
I once heard of a serial rapist who’d lure women to alleys threatening to hurt them while a friend played lookout then he forced them to say they wanted him before raping them. Eventually he got caught. Eventually.

The ‘game’ of getting the woman to agree is part of the sexual thrill, because they can take that choice away from her too.

A No doesn’t change into a Yes. That’s called nagging. The coercion thing isn’t widely known although rape by fraud is old as the hills, so the rapist also assumes they’re covered as long as she says the ‘Magic Word’ (until they’re in front of a judge).

There isn’t a magic word that makes rape OK. That’s kinda the point of rape, taking, as in taking away.

Date rapists are harder to catch because the women involved believe it was their fault and he isn’t like that with others (he is). So yes, report it. Others might not get away and you can do everything right and still get raped if they drug you (that’s why date rape is yes, actually, very real, and anyone who tries to argue otherwise is flagging as one of them).

Rapists fear healthy personal boundaries.

Update: I’ll throw this here.

http://www.cracked.com/blog/how-men-are-trained-to-think-sexual-assault-no-big-deal/

Stalking isn’t romantic.
Harassment isn’t brave.
People don’t owe other people anything.
There are no excuses for shitty behaviour.

I cba to go into this one.

Short version – women are not men and don’t have male libido, even porn stars aren’t really into it/you.

It’s stupid to assume all women are coy like some 19th century Austen novel and further, coyness is lying. Coy women don’t sleep with you. It is exclusive from sluttiness. Sluttiness is anti-coy. But I guess that wouldn’t make porn as fun to watch.

There’s no such thing as playing hard to get. You’re either hard to get or easy.

Imagine if we flipped it and said everything men do, they do for female attention and approval. Good career? Wants to attract a good woman. Nice car? He can’t appreciate cars for themselves, it must be to get women. Nice body? He doesn’t care for his health, it’s all about us. It’s incredibly narcissistic and spoiled to assume the choices of others have ANYTHING to do with you.

It’s also sexist to assume that clothing choices based on temperature e.g. male shirtlessness, female mini-skirts, or other practicality, have anything to do with their moral character.

Adult men have no excuse to think as stupidly as teenage boys.
They want an excuse for their actions, they want someone else to blame.

comment

I don’t have anything much to add to this except to say that I do really appreciate the article. It is frustrating to deal with guys who simply refuse to accept ‘no’ as an answer, because there is no way to ‘really’ refuse once ‘no’ is off the table. Short of fleeing the scene, what the f**k can you say?

That’s the point. It’s a trap.
They think if they can rationalize it, it isn’t rape and you’re the ‘crazy’ one.

Ahh, gaslighting again. Notice how this often crops up with the shit of the species? Because obviously, it can never be sociopath/borderline/plain jerk’s fault. You know, the consequences of his actions. Like a man. You push him away, kick him, bite, scream or punch him? You’re a crazy bitch! But him initiating physical action goes unmentioned. It ‘doesn’t count’ as assault, in his mind, because his consent to your body over-rides your human rights. They never mention what they did just before and claim not to see anything wrong – but they don’t mention it unless forced. This is why they rarely harass women in the company of other men – they know it’s wrong and fear punishment for the crime. This is why they usually stop hassling a girl if she says ‘I have a boyfriend’ (women have to lie to be left alone, minding their own business alone, in public. In the West). They’re cowards trying to exert control over others, women are simply the sex less physically equipped to defend ourselves.

They think No means Yes and Get Lost means Take Me I’m Yours – a Disney cartoon figured this out.

They don’t really think that, they’re pushing their luck and the boundaries of the law.

No means No because that’s literally the line. That’s the legal line we shouldn’t have to reach when there are other forms of rejection men are willfully blind to. It’s been proven men assume sexual interest where there is none. It’s a defect in their programming. However, ignoring many indicators to the contrary (emotional intelligence) isn’t an excuse. Women are people, first and foremost, and respect should be given when asking anyone for anything, since you are in the position of desire and need them to oblige you.

The whole tone of that article is a theme I call Poor Men, via Women.

Wtf.

How enlightened, feminist guy.

You’ve gone from acting like a black guy (where all this ‘sexual culture’ comes from) to just a plain misogynist, who can’t understand that women aren’t billboards for male attention. via People is terribly dehumanizing as a message.

It isn’t about you.
It isn’t about you.
It isn’t about you.

Assumptions make a what?

The feminists do the opposite, like Emma Watson signalling Poor Women, via Men. Still wrong, still sexism. You don’t self-actualize or seek attention/sympathy via the opposite sex. Or any other people, really. Your business is yours, not every stranger who piques your fancy.

OT

We seem to have a form of sexual politics like consensus reality. There’s no such thing as consensus morality. Let’s assume coercion doesn’t apply for a moment. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Two people can agree to something, doesn’t make it less wrong. Evil can be mutually agreed. So no, getting a Yes doesn’t get you off the hook for what you choose to do with your own body.

Update: Rape gangs are illegal because it’s organised sexual coercion of women (not just minors).  It’s organised crime, it just happens to be rape than common theft.

Which brings me onto a valid point.

Playing the Eve Teasing line “it’s her fault for being too attractive”, I don’t get to rob a bank and go “but, your Honour, it’s their fault for having too much money!”
You’re responsible for your own impulse control, you monsters. Impulse control is heavily tied to IQ, Westerners have no excuse. Rapists are the sexual Marxists of the world, willing to steal what they can’t earn. You are not allowed to reject a Marxist’s claim to your income, the fruit of your body.
Do regular white women have to be like children in Sweden and wear wristbands saying “please don’t rape me”? You’d ignore those too. Almost like you don’t consider the target group as people, like the rape gangs.
Erotic capital is not a choice, men have it too, expression of sensuality is cultural, social, not necessarily sexual (the culture says we need to look somewhat sexy to conform! and too many things are labelled sexy when they aren’t) and what one person does e.g. tight clothing, is not a super-secret, erotomanic code for burning desire to random observer. It isn’t about you. If a woman wants a man, in this culture, she can ask him out. He doesn’t need to “chase” her, he isn’t a lion about to eat a gazelle. To compare their fun to murder really shows their character, dunnit?

Video: The etiquette problem of entitlement

It reminds me of little kids.

Looking is not touching.

Touching strangers is wrong.

It isn’t friendly.

It’s creepy.

It’s like copping a free feel or trying to ingratiate yourself psychologically.
Oxytocin to create a bond isn’t released from stranger interactions. Cortisol, the stress hormone, is.

Entitlement: Why do you get to impose your expectation on other people, your legal equals?

If it’s friendly, they’d do it to other men. It tends to be men doing it to women because 1. it’s obviously sexual and most of them are straight, unfortunately, meaning men rarely have this problem and 2. they believe there’s a low risk of being punched in the face. True. But there is a higher risk of being kicked in the balls. Grabbing or pinning is an attack common to martial arts and obstructing someone from moving freely (penning) is legal cause for self-defense. The intention is not important, legally.

When other men do it, you’d assume you’re being attacked. ‘Kino’ is assault.

http://www.blackbeltmag.com/daily/martial-arts-entertainment/martial-arts-multimedia/how-to-use-krav-maga-for-self-defense-against-a-shirt-grab/

Proxemics aside, cultural differences are no excuse, respect the people you’re talking to as people, like you.
As in, neither party has the right to randomly paw at the other.

Booze is not an excuse. Crashing a car is still bad, whether you’re drunk or not. Again, your intention should be translated into appropriate actions. A judge would ask why you created that situation and expected it to end well, ignorance of the laws is no excuse.

You don’t get to foist any kind of intimacy on people, it doesn’t matter how well you know them, they retain rights. This is called escalating in PUA circles, forcing intimacy. That kind of force is illegal, yo. The word ‘force’ gives it away, kay?

These people presume you’re ‘game’ to be humiliated, demeaned or used in the hopes you have no personal boundaries. It’s to do with sociological frames, they assume control hoping you won’t question the assumption. Personal boundaries are a human right, legally and socially. If someone doesn’t respect your boundaries, they don’t respect you. The law also applies in clubs or hell, even a brothel. They’d literally treat a prostitute with more respect. They judged you to be less worthy of respect than a hooker. They wonder at their ‘fail rate’.

RUDE PEOPLE DO NOT DESERVE POLITENESS IN RETURN.

This rewards them. This encourages them. Say they’re being rude. Use the word rude. Be rude yourself, they deserve it. You don’t have to impress them, befriend, correct or be nice to them. They set the tone, not you.

Do not fall into the trap of treating them like they’re your responsibility, they aren’t your naughty child and they enjoy this attention as an opener to befriend you. It isn’t your fault their mama raised them wrong. You can’t fix them, they’re adults, they’re already dead inside. There’s no hope. Don’t stand around trying to correct someone on etiquette (and respect) who doesn’t believe in evil or their own capacity for wrongdoing. Don’t try to ‘save’ them, you aren’t Jesus, dear. Walk away as soon as possible, tell an authority figure in case they start on others (they will, because you’re so special), after pointing out somehow they were 1. rude and it was 2. wrong of them to behave like this. They need telling, but only because the message will sink in with punishment.

There are plenty of discussions about ‘female entitlement’ from such men, notice the clause. Derailing, seriously? Doesn’t change the fact, does it? Changing the subject doesn’t change the agency of men, does it?

Tu quoque isn’t a license to assault. ‘It’s bad for you too!’ hypothetically or really, doesn’t make it morally acceptable, does it? Two wrongs do not make a right, do they? It isn’t the agent, and it’s behaviour. A man or a woman can be an alcoholic, doesn’t make alcoholism better or worse. They are defined by their bad choices.

People are rude. Men can ‘confuse’ the difference between assertive (Can I buy you a drink? Hello, you seem nice.) with aggressive (if you have to grab, it’s because you know she doesn’t want to grab you).

Just get the bouncer or a really gay guy to grab them in exactly the same way and see if he thinks it’s fine. No women to blame there. It’s the Western version of Eve Teasing and it demeans us all, as a society. We shouldn’t have to explain why people in the West have the human right to go out without being molested. Would they also pass a child in a park and grab them that way, if it’s so ‘friendly’ and the word they refuse to use, ‘innocent’?

Just point out their behaviour. They get really flustered at being challenged and having to explain themselves.
Even a parent wouldn’t randomly walk up and grab their child, so they’re presuming a level of control and dominance above the people who made you. Not attractive. They grab you because they cannot grab your attention. It’s sad, really. Don’t pity the predator though. They will go on to do it to others.

Why do you think you get to touch me? You don’t own me. I own me. People aren’t pets, don’t pet me.

Do you often go around groping strangers? [yes they do]

You do know going round feeling people up is illegal? It’s also a fetish called frottage.

Grab me again and I’ll defend myself. [this really triggers them into umbrage]

If this is how you treat strangers, maybe you rape your friends. [only use if obnoxious]

Even when we shake hands, they are offered. This allows the physical bid to be rejected. This is polite among men.

Swerving and giving them a disgusted expression will often convey better than words, as a first line of defence. You note the easy application of defence? Because restricting a person’s use of their own body is an attack.
Second line “what’s wrong with you?” accurately puts the attention on their responsibility for their own actions.

Liking someone’s outfit, or them being a celebrity, or thinking they’re pretty, is not an excuse to touch them. Ask if you can touch the fabric of an outfit and they’ll usually offer a sex-neutral area, like an arm or shoulder. That’s fine.

You don’t go up and touch their handbag or their car, do you? Why accord their body less respect?

In short, don’t treat regular people, male or female, with less respect than you’d show a stripper, who is protected by bouncers.

Chasing people around a place makes you a sexual predator too. We’ve all seen the poor women hiding in the bathroom so the creep will leave. Don’t complain you keep being called a creep, if you keep acting like one.

Male Entitlement and Creepiness

The manosphere completely ignores the findings that support this reason (if you act like a creep, you’ll be labelled and treated as a creep, because that’s exactly what you are), they’re ignoring the connection to entitlement, a similar issue in rapefugees with Eve Teasing and Taharrush, who think they can go around forcing their various body parts on random women purely because these evil women tempted them with their attractiveness (sure, it starts with cornering them and using hands, cos that alone isn’t creepy…), ignoring all this connection because they’re bluepill pussies who can’t handle a truth that triggers doubt over their worldview, so I thought I’d post this one early. Note how they also ignored the finding of what women DO want? (Gentlemen). I guess their red pills must be suppositories.

As for the bitching about ‘Creep shaming’, it exists about as much as fat shaming (only works on fat people), because they must be basing it on something you did. 

As promised and this was originally based on;
http://www.doctornerdlove.com/2011/12/dont-be-a-creeper/all/1/
A heady dose of desperation in there too.

“In fact, because they don’t live with the same omnipresent threat that women do, they’re frequently offended by the idea that it’s their behavior that creeps girls out.”

sherlock bbc cracking up lol laughing so hard

10/10 truth, because as we know from SJWs, if you’re offended, you must be in the right!
How dare an adult be held morally and legally responsible for their action! They talk a big game about alpha but they don’t really wanna be held to the standard, do they? It begs the question, how many of their ‘false’ rape accusations are really false? Are they honestly retarded enough to think a judge will fall for “Yeah I isolated her from her friends and assaulted her when she told me to ‘fuck off’, and stalked her round the club, insisted she come back to mine but said an innocent reason, tried to force myself on her after plying with alcohol because she owes me, drinks are expensive, she said No clearly multiple times, but she didn’t really mean it, cos this guy online said it was OK to keep pushing through Last Minute Resistance and not use a condom even though I have STDs from fucking around like this, she froze in fear and cried after, she totally wanted this alpha cock. I’m not a rapist, how dare you falsely accuse me?

They literally can’t be that dumb, I refuse to believe it.
Don’t wanna be called a creep? Don’t be creepy. Don’t wanna be accused of rape? Don’t force a sexual act against the will of the other party (the act of coercion). It’s almost as if they haven’t read the local laws and solipsistic-ally think they’re above them (that could never happen to me! I’m too smooth! I’d never really force a woman, also, choking isn’t physical abuse and attempted murder, it’s foreplay), this ignorance of how warped they are and ignorant of the criminal law they often discuss without researching (!) is something I frequently mock PUAs for ignoring until it bites them on the ass, at which point the enforcement system is working, despite their pathetic mewls of victimhood. Do the crime, do the time, bitches. What they fail to mention in those cases is that rapists get accused too. Being accused doesn’t make you innocent, in fact, the odds drop significantly. Few victims come forward as is.

Moral of this: never trust a man who excuses his actions with ‘really’ e.g. really rape, real victim. He meets the definition, he did the thing and he’s trying to pick around it and excuse it (scum).

Most violent crimes are committed by men. This is a hatefact to the manosphere. We don’t walk down dark alleys or swear at gangs either. This type mock our precautions, while blaming us when some crime is committed (you can take all the precaution in the world, but criminals gonna commit crimes, it’s the criminal’s fault). They refuse to blame the male for his own actions, they don’t really believe a man can be creepy (potential rapist) or a ‘real’ rapist. They excuse the criminal’s behaviour based on their sex, there must be some ‘reasonable’ explanation, in the same vein that feminists excuse female borderlines when they attack partners (hey men, why not take the precaution of never dating a borderline? why put yourself in that situation if you didn’t secretly want it?).

Stranger danger exists beyond childhood, and if you’re approaching a stranger, whatever your sex, you need to make it clear you have no expectations to pressure them with, because the nature of walking up to someone is primitvely an attack and causes an instinctive defensive reaction.

“Leaving your hand on a girl for too long – even in a neutral place like the shoulder or middle of the arm – will read as though you’re claiming possession of her… or worse, that you’re going to drag her off somewhere.”

Ask yourself: is this what a rapist would do? Would a rapist establish physical contact to lead a girl down a dark alley, to his place after she’s too weak from intoxication to know what’s going on? Then why are you engaging in the process a rapist would take? Oh, you claim to care about consent, that it’s consensual? Then why ignore it multiple times? She steps away, you ignore it. Creep XP +10. She says to leave her alone, you disrespect it. Creep XP+20. She says No, you force it anyway. Creep XP+100, unless you’re forcing ‘sex’, which isn’t sex, it’s called rape. Those are the actions of a rapist. Defamation means creepy is a politer code for “this person is enacting the rapist script, danger, avoid”.

Modern women don’t want cavemen.

“Jokes about rape, abduction, physical assault or murder are off the table. Period.”

Yes, some of these self-important Casanova wannabes do that. Remember, Casanova died alone.
Don’t speak to a woman like a man down the pub. Ask yourself, what would a rapist say and do right now? And never do that. This isn’t rocket science, you are legally and socially culpable for your actions and words.

“Creepy guys will stick around long past the time when they were supposed to leave.”

The desperation of men who say they don’t need women, and treat a No as a Maybe.

“Most women are socially conditioned not to give offense or hurt men’s feelings and so they’ll rarely break off a conversation directly.”

If we are polite, we are ‘friendly’ and it’s an invitation to keep pestering us. If we are friendly, we are ‘flirting’ and a
‘tease’ who ‘owes’ you sex. If we are honest to save time, we are ‘rude’ stuck-up bitches. Socially, men are idiots. Everytime a woman hears the insult “you’re so rude” from a man, we can’t help but laugh, because they don’t even know what they did wrong. Naturally, pointing out what they did (educating them, the opposite of mansplaining) gets you call rude and possibly a know-it-all. Oh, how terrible, knowing things! Knowing social manners an adult should be expected to know and abide! What a disgrace to womankind, to know etiquette! To correct a man with the manners of a monkey! Does he feel ‘offended’ too? Was I supposed to stand here like his sex doll and waste my time listening to the random detritus of society lying because he feels entitled to my attention and thinks I’m stupid enough to fall for it? Literally, any insults shot at a woman along the lines of rude or crass or variations of ‘not womanly’ or ladylike are like the fat chicks who say they didn’t want that thin man anyway, he was too skinny. The ‘rude’ woman, to these morons, is simply being honest. The same bluntness they beg women to demonstrate in comments (why can’t women say what they mean? why can they be honest? – you insult us for it?), so they can fix what they’re doing wrong. The only thing they wanna fix is the outcome, they get sex whatever the woman herself thinks, ding ding rape charges. They can hardly call her wrong for noting his mistake. As an aside, women shouldn’t be grateful for male attention. Considering their frequent base motivations, it’s more of an insult (to assume she would be interested in servicing his lust). In a First World country, people are supposed to be nice to one another, socially. It doesn’t earn you anything.

See what happens when entitled men don’t get the reaction they expect.
elitedaily.com/dating/when-guys-expect-sex-and-dont-get-it/1450462/
Mantrums. Grown men throwing a wobbly like a toddler. ……Sexy……so alpha.….

Creep isn’t about male status, although lower class men are more likely to be creeps (and less likely to be gentlemen).
Creepiness is about personal danger and manipulation. In an individualist society where women are responsible for our own safety, we will be hypervigilant about creeps. Don’t like it? You’re probably a creep.
My advice to women? The immature boys among them will turn if you don’t give them an Out, a means to save face. Something like Thanks for the offer, at least you tried.
However, rudeness is always an option, and a viable acceptable one, if nothing less will work from the perspective of verbal self-defense. Guys, would you rather be hit for touching a random woman or told to fuck off? What does it matter if she’s single, that doesn’t make her available, she still doesn’t want you, that’s the only meaningful fact.
Respecting boundaries is easy for those with a decent upbringing and while I have sympathy for boys who grew up without father figures, as an adult, there is no excuse for ignorance. These guys wouldn’t go up and touch a stranger’s car, but they’d touch the owner’s wife? How damaged have we become as a society to think that’s the way round it should be?

This comment is wise;
Women are the ones who know what they find threatening. If a man puts them off for whatever reason, that is a valid reason. A woman always has a right to her opinion of a suitor.”

As in traffic law with the right of way, women have the Right of Rejection. Creepiness ignores a woman’s right to her body, her space and her own opinions (gaslighting manipulation). You cannot turn a No into a Yes. That’s called coercion and it obviates consent. 

Sexual predators in our culture try to pass themselves off as harmless to lure their prey. In our culture, that means Nice Guy geeks, who are normally lazy and trying to pass off insecurity as introversion, narcissism as art.
A woman is either interested or not. Attraction is not a negotiation. Approaching her will have no bearing on this, because you’re still the same person in both conditions. You approach to find out which one aka there is no way to engineer (manipulate, creep alert) the situation from a No into a Yes. People who promise you this magic cheat code to vagina (no care for the person attached) always line their pockets with your cash, because mind control could be put to better use by those with the secrets and allow them to take over the world. You’ve been conned as much as the guy who thinks he’s buying secrets to ‘game‘ the stock market.
That you want a woman who 1. doesn’t want you, 2. knowing she doesn’t want you, 3. yet continuing to push and force it, is the motivation of a predator, that’s why we respond like it. Want real advice you’ll never hear from ‘nerdy men’?
As far as relationship entitlement, they (a lot of geeks) expect the world while giving only their company (selective). They want a homemaker, cooking, cleaning and being the maid, the actions of a houseWIFE, but never giving the woman the security of marriage. They want financial equality though, which translates as being a drain because his hobbies are more expensive. They want the sex of a whore, and the variety without paying for it, romance is forced and must be nagged to be given in exchange. They seem to think emotional ignorance is masculine and refuse to admit women have valid needs too. They have a trail of exes they describe as confused, while unable to place why they broke up but unable to keep just one (I guess they’re all broken). Socially, they humiliate their women and fail to see a problem, blaming her high standards. In return, they want a sexualised version of their mothers, who couldn’t abandon them, no matter how immature and brattish they got. They see marriage as Game Over, you can stop trying now, put zero effort into the marriage and whine when they get divorced because apparently the woman lied to him when she told him what he failed to provide, giving multiple opportunities to address it. But he’s old-fashioned, right?
In these matters of the heart, actions are louder than words. If you fail to behave correctly, things will go ‘wrong’.
I don’t remember the good old days when men abandoned their women and failed in every conceivable way AS men in their gender role, but alright. What entitlement, right? Why aren’t the ladies swarming him? Ladies, not those whores he wants sex from. Ladies, who will act like whores for some reason, as if he’s the protagonist in a video game, prove he’s special to himself. Gentlemen? Those don’t exist anymore, he bitches. It’s unreasonable to hold him to that standard.
Women are people, not puzzles. What you see as brave persistence, a judge will see as a restraining order. Keep trying and trying, and you are a creep. There are no social respawns.
Women owe you nothing. Rejection is a fact of life.
Men owe you nothing either. Professional rejection happens too.
Pedants are trying to win big status points (whataboutism, yes BUT…, appeal to exception, appeal to anecdote). Someone responding socially to pedantry with rational counterarguments is humouring you in the hopes you’ll move on, not endorsing the methods. As in, a woman isn’t biting when she talks back, she’s trying to form a negative impression so you’ll leave. Unfortunately, these desperate losers see any kind of female attention, however negative, as encouragement and ideological endorsement. (I have written about the unfalsifiability of Shit Tests, everything rationalized as positive signs of attraction -very autiste-, and how No doesn’t really exist to these guys, it doesn’t penetrate their thick skulls, so how the hell are we meant to get you to leave, what other word is there? And you wonder why women ‘flake’, finally  act on their disgust and disinterest because you didn’t actually pick up on the feminine social cues like you thought, leaving you confused). Studies have shown men assume sexual interest where there is none, even disgust. Does the redpill lot care? Nope. It doesn’t confirm their beliefs so it must be wrong.
Affection isn’t based on charity or pity. Brush up your skills, bring something else to the table or GTFO. Dogs are nicer and elicit more sympathy than all humans, we don’t wanna sleep with them either. I’ve seen men so out of touch with reality show me pictures of them holding puppies thinking it will change my mind and make me fancy them. No. No no no no. Anymore than if I were to show you a picture of me holding a baby, you’d suddenly and immediately want me to be the mother of your children. That’s psychotic, people aren’t that dumb.
“But he’s so nice” other men say, well, in that case, you fuck him, dude. If you think he’s so nice, you fuck him yourself.
Don’t try to pimp out women with guilt, we all know those Nice Guys are 100% judging on appearance when they approach us, aka, they are nasty, they’re shallow pricks. We’re simply judging by the same superficial standard.

Genuine niceness doesn’t come with expectations and conditions. 

Women don’t stay with jerks and men don’t stay with bitches (unless both parties are, you deserve each other). If you want to become the SO and you’re jealous of them, they must be good people to admire, watch what they bring to the table and develop it for the next potential date. Don’t confuse an In spite of, with a causal Because of. For example, hot women can afford to be bitches, but bitchy women are not hot.

Tantrums are for children.

A final redflag: they argue with your OPINION.
Das gaslighting. Run, don’t walk.
Don’t be like Chucky Lopez, who writes;
“Cold approaches from a stranger are NOT identically equal to predatory behaviour.”
Walking up to a total stranger and trying to control their behaviour, dominate them according to your desires is exactly what a predator does. Sexual predators and con artists do exactly that, to extract something by force and take it for their own kick.
Ted Bundy played the Nice Guy and he cold-approached with a plaster cast. Do you think women don’t have these stories in the back of our minds when you act the same? He was handsome and creepy and crazy. It wasn’t an excuse. Note how even those who endorse it agree they are similar? The men who argue and moan and whine are actually trying to steal the feminine gender role of establishing social contact.

Historically, women have the Right to Approach men, clubs alone break this rule (sometimes) and shouldn’t (women have legs and we can use them). IOIs are actually recognition that women establish social contact (looking and smiling, waving, introducing ourselves).

Non-predatory socializing, by contrast, is introduced, via mutual friends, who attest to reputation. We live in a low-trust society and predators taking advantage of what used to be excusable faux pas (speaking to someone without introduction) has made it unacceptable. Women actually set the tone in engaging men socially, something men conveniently ‘forget’. A woman in a high trust society could speak to a random man, but not the other way around.

You are not entitled to socialize with a woman and force her attention and waste her time, as social circles are the Woman’s Domain, we have the social power and the social-emotional intelligence to boot. We outrank you here.
Why do you think the hostess receives visitors and makes introductions? By slighting our role in this and taking our singular social choice away, they disrespect us in public, while choosing to view it as a good sign of his strength (pigheadedness). They’re abolishing age-old gender roles, like a feminist.

Fun fact: the word “immorality”, the original meaning as used in previous centuries was a polite term for sexual immorality and promiscuity. As in, promiscuous people have no valid opinions on immorality. Ask a druggie about legalization. Dopamine highs, man. Sluts are by definition immoral. There was no other kind of immorality, like the feminists have tried to distinguish. Only religious failures of chastity, that applied to men too e.g. no adultery.