Nature: Old fathers, sick babies

The people pushing a “Father at Any Age, Just Find a Young Woman” model are just as evil as the female counterparts. You can’t trick nature. Who would deliberately stall and put their descendants in such an injured, sickly position? Monsters. ‘Have It All’ is impossible. Family or party, pick ONE.

http://www.nature.com/news/fathers-bequeath-more-mutations-as-they-age-1.11247

Fathers passed on nearly four times as many new mutations as mothers: on average, 55 versus 14.

The father’s age also accounted for nearly all of the variation in the number of new mutations in a child’s genome,

with the number of new mutations being passed on rising exponentially with paternal age.

A 36-year-old will pass on twice as many mutations to his child as a man of 20, and a 70-year-old eight times as many, Stefánsson’s team estimates.

Go ahead, deny the damage of mutation load, I dare you. Let’s see if you’re redpill and accept the genetic data or a narcissist just like the ‘career women’ coldly leaving it as late as possible.

Nature is very clear that, given the option, youthful parents (18-25) are the better parents (genetically) in both sexes.  How could any sane person, educated in genetics, see it any other way?

By starting families in their thirties, forties and beyond,

The manosphere is doomed to comparative genetic inferiority.

men could be increasing the chances that their children will develop autism, schizophrenia and other diseases often linked to new mutations.

The super-classy myth of blaming older (supposedly feminist?) mothers for child autism is also wrong, if you look up the data, which points to a paternal and grand-paternal age link. Nor does it make basic logical sense that a Male Brained neurological problem would be passed on from anyone other than the father (that Y chromosome?). As more data is taken, this connection will only get stronger, so a word to the unwise: quit putting it off, idiots.

Naturally, the other options are genetic suicide (probably a good idea for this selfish type, imagine what awful parents they’d be) and/or mudsharking/outbreeding, since they can’t get a higher status (usually) white woman, which also, as covered in the mixed post, causes psychiatric issues. Those two races did not co-evolve, the material conflict fundamentally, it’s like mixing oil and water. Especially half Asian/half Europeans, like …Elliot Rodger.

wow omg omfg how can you be so dumb really stupid fyi

Yeah, that’s an angle I never covered. 100% true.

inb4 an embittered shriveled egg joke, that will not be a problem
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/02/120229-women-health-ovaries-eggs-reproduction-science/

Aspergers (and other autism) is NOT genius

http://iqpersonalitygenius.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/the-relationship-between-aspergers.html

Clinically, Asperger’s doesn’t even exist anymore. It was removed from the DSM-V and subsumed under the Other category. Most autistics are not geniuses (pop culture myth) and further, savants (what most people mean) don’t need to have a mental illness. Some are genetic, some are accidental. The autistic savants are easier to spot.

Universities filter for the precocious, and I believe this is a core reason we don’t see geniuses in academia anymore (plus the excessively long training times, stifling environment, low wages like a slave and the expectation of hoop jumping like a prize dog).

A lot of reddit morons go around bragging about their Asperger’s because they believe it equates to genius. Don’t bother uttering the words ‘false equivalence’.

Academic genius (Binet IQ) doesn’t necessarily mean jack either. It’s about what you do with it. If you sit on your arse doing nothing and playing video games, you might as well be retarded. Creative genius is what people praise, not a G score on a piece of paper. They see it as a license to be lazy. More fool them.

On the other hand, most people with Asperger’s syndrome are not geniuses (not even partial or potential geniuses), even when they have exceptionally high intelligence – because they lack the intuitive style of thinking which is vital for real creativity.

In my experience, real genius has a drive, a grit and resilience toward their subject/s.
Motivation is not a problem for them. Ever. As one told me: I have found my life’s calling, why would I want to do anything else? 

Einstein wrote widely on intuition in science but don’t expect the supposed rationalists to listen from pride. They see it as a girly thing.

They are not anti-social either. The party-hard model of modernity is unnatural. They don’t buy into it. At most, they are asocial, they can do without, unless they’re selective. It’s a choice.

A genius is one whose main focus and motivation is not social, nor sexual; but instead abstract, asocial – whether artistic, scientific, technical, or whatever it may be.

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/the-genius-famine-book-online-excerpts.html

Always happy to plug great work.

Whosoever is delighted in solitude is either a wild beast or a god. ~ Aristotle

Link: Against ‘Against Autism Cures’

http://slatestarcodex.com/2015/10/12/against-against-autism-cures/

There are many fakes claiming mental illness then failing to need anything on the illness front. If you aren’t in need of medical attention, you aren’t ill and society should revoke your perks. Overdiagnosis aside, it’s becoming an absurdly common excuse to avoid anything they dislike. It’s like the conflation of irritation, annoyance and offence. Autism is one of those overly broad categories that shouldn’t be used anymore because it contains the entire spectrum (no not that one) of mild conditions, probably personality quirks or lack of skills, the proper illnesses that need a treatment plan but can get along and then the extreme cases, which cannot live or function in society and used to be killed on the quiet. Giving all those groups the same banner seems insane to me.

At least now we know the brain is part of the immune system, the true work can begin.

It’s an illness we cannot examine from the outside, because we have no idea what their inner world is like. All attempts have shown it up to be completely different to regular people, sometimes in a positive way (although you don’t have to be autistic to be a savant) but usually in the exact closed-off way that they cannot be reached. It would seem unfair to hold those people to arbitrary standards of psychiatric norm.

They’ve spent years trying to raise kids who were violent, self-injurious, locked in a sensory hell without the ability to explain their problems verbally, and maybe having seizures all the time to boot. Their decision to institutionalize is a reluctant concession to this reality.

It was one of the early arguments for abortion, that with certain conditions they would suffer too much in life. It’s kinda like a social locked-in syndrome. And the people who go on about ALL mental illness being faked/the psychiatry Scientology conspiracy, have never met them.

And maybe the best option is that somebody develops technology that can change your brain type during adulthood, so that everyone has the option of experiencing life as an autistic person and as a neurotypical person and seeing which is best for them. Invent something like that and the problem disappears.

Turning nerd for a moment that sounds to me like a mobile TMS unit.

And a lot depends on the genetic structure of autism. If autism is just the brain’s response to high mutational load, then trying to do most other good things will prevent autism as a side effect. On the other hand, if autism is the extreme version of a trait whose common version is “good at logical and scientific thinking”, then we have to ask ourselves whether that trait is worth messing with. As usual, everything about genetic engineering raises thorny scientific and ethical quandaries, and I can only hope we don’t drag our feet in creating the eight-foot-tall IQ 300 supermen who can solve them.

Good for individual vs. society. Could be the personality is just another layer on top of normality like high Mach sociopaths and the extreme cases only seem to mimic the personality since they’re restricted in other ways. Ironically, in a world cured of autism, nobody would be capable of answering such a conceptual question. Science would probably die.

The most disturbing part is that they don’t want the support of illness, but they want societal goodies and freebies for being ill. Seems like a con. Are you special? Are you normal? Which is it?

Of course the brain is part of the immune system, we’ve been trying to tell you for years

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/06/150601122445.htm

I want to draw your attention to something.

Something small. The lesson is crucial.

“but the true significance of the discovery lies in the effects it could have on the study and treatment of neurological diseases ranging from autism to Alzheimer’s disease to multiple sclerosis.”

Called it on Alzheimer’s.

Called it on autism.

I feel like fucking Cassandra. I don’t say this from a point of vanity, it enrages me, the arrogance of these people to not look in the places pointed out to them for years (autoimmune response from vaccines) has caused how many millions to suffer?

And now they’re laughing it off, like, LOL, textbooks need to be changed $$$$$ for us.

I, among many others, have tried in vain to point this out, only to be told the same things: “there is no uncharted part of anatomy hence no point in even looking” and “that’s for real Doctors, we just need to give them drugs”.

Remember how this finding is being treated with flippancy when you automatically accord respect to researchers and scientists thanks to their credentials or fancy title. This is why I don’t use my real credentials, (see About) either the facts and truth are there or they aren’t – regardless of whom puts them forth. They don’t care about the truth, most of them, some care about their ego and others profiteering from ailments they likely caused when they pushed for things they didn’t understand and – worst of all, didn’t want to.

fury anger hades

Crunch time for the pro-vaccine lobbyists

http://www.globalresearch.ca/vaccine-mccarthyism-what-if-the-vaccine-paradigm-itself-is-deliberately-flawed/5427768

The year, 2014, has been a particularly dismal year for the pro-vaccine movement. We are presenting the science that has unfolded during the past twelve months as indicative of a collapse in the modern vaccine paradigm.

Last year, 2014, may well be the watershed year marking the demise of the vaccine era.  Without any recent credible and sound biological science to support their claims for vaccines’ efficacy and safety, the vaccine complex and its federal allies have been forced to rely upon courts of law and the ignorance of an inept mainstream media to further promulgate their flawed mythologies to advance the vaccine agenda…..

And this year…

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/bombshell-cdc-whistleblower-who-admitted-covering-up-mmr-vaccine-links-to-autism-granted-immunity-will-testify_022015

Now, here’s why this story is back in the news: it is being reported that the Obama administration has granted Dr. Thompson official whistleblower status and immunity. This will allow him to testify before Congress about CDC fraud regarding vaccine safety and to explain the thousands of documents that have been turned over to congressional representatives, reports VaxTruth.org.

So, now, we wait for that hearing.

I hope the common attack of “babykiller” will be thrown in the appropriate direction when these facts come out.

Parkinson’s + gut microbiome, perhaps pathogenic link

Shhh, don’t tell the 4eva!pro-vaccine people who said there could be no link whatsoever between the gut and the brain at any point in science forever and ever. The people who laughed at such connections. History shall laugh at them on our behalf. High road, people.

http://www.news-medical.net/news/20150116/Disturbed-gut-microbiome-linked-to-Parkinsone28099s-disease.aspx

Research suggests that the intestinal microbiome may be altered in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), with some alterations being specific to the motor subtype.

The team found that bacteria from the Prevotellaceae family were significantly less abundant in the faeces of 72 PD patients than in 72 age- and gender-matched controls, at a median of 0.16% versus 0.77%, equating to a 77.6% reduction.

Low Prevotellaceae abundance (≤6.5%) was 86.1% sensitive for the presence of PD, but only 38.9% specific. Low levels were common in both groups, and Filip Scheperjans (Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland) and co-workers note that reduced Prevotellaceae levels have also been reported in patients with autism and Type 1 diabetes…..

no plz stop idiot damon

Aaand you see where I’m going with this.
Dare I ask them to check their patients against their vaccination records for once? JUST ONCE.

Bearing in mind;

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/11/141114-autism-gut-brain-probiotic-research-biology-medicine-bacteria/

http://www.ibtimes.com/can-gut-bacteria-manipulate-human-brain-research-gains-momentum-us-1723242

Paper: Molecular Sex Differences in Human Serum (Asperger’s application)

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0051504

Sex-specific molecular differences were detected in serum of typical controls and these were reproducible across independent cohorts. This study extends current knowledge of sex differences in biological functions involved in metabolism and immune function. Deviations from typical sex differences were found in a cluster of molecules in Asperger syndrome. These findings illustrate the importance of investigating the influence of sex on medical conditions.

What a shame the new DSM removes Asperger’s as a seperate form of autism. Still. It goes to show how strong inter-sexual differences are medically. This is important stuff.

Aluminium in Autism (and Alzheimers, Parkinsons etc).

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/12/03/mit-scientist-shows-what-can-happen-to-children-who-receive-aluminum-containing-vaccines/

good links

….“Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s medical understanding of their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted.” (5) – Dr. Chris Shaw, with the UBC Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Experimental Medicine and the Graduate Program in Neuroscience

….

Professor Christopher Shaw and Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic of UBC (in a recent study) also show that the more children receive vaccines with aluminum adjuvants, the greater their chance is of developing autism, autoimmune diseases and neurological problems later in life.  A demonstrated neurotoxin, Aluminum is the only approved adjuvant in the US.   Its use presents the risk of brain inflammation, autoimmunity and other adverse health consequences.(6)

Just as a side note, it is known that aluminum accumulates in the brain and that this accumulation is associated with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases and with Gulf War Syndrome. (7)(8)

And dementia in tandem with flouride: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/iage/201407/is-dementia-caused-aluminum-through-fluoridation
FYI: sodium fluoride is an industrial waste product companies pay councils to dump in local water supplies.

As noted above, Dr. Seneff commonly makes the case that neurological brain diseases are a result of an insufficient supply of sulfate to the brain. She argues that systematic sulfate deficiency “may be the most important factor in many of the health issues facing us today.”

“One of the consequences of insufficient sulfate in the brain is that it impairs the brain’s ability to eliminate heavy metals and other toxins. To make matters worse, those same toxic metals also interfere with sulfate synthesis. The net result can be an accumulation of cellular debris.” – (source) Claire I. Viadro, MPH, PhD

This is supported by sulphur studies that show people don’t get enough in their diet: http://www.nutritionandmetabolism.com/content/4/1/24

It seems a paleo diet increases sulphur in one’s diet anyway: http://www.livestrong.com/article/289250-list-of-foods-high-in-sulfur/

“In addition, melatonin not only transports sulfate but also is an outstanding antioxidant and binds toxic metals to help dispose of them. It may come as no surprise, then, that melatonin impairment has been implicated in autism.” – (source) Claire I. Viadro, MPH, PhD

“Scientists are taking note of the fact that we live in an “age of aluminum,” with aluminum exposure occurring through vaccines as well as multiple other channels. Moreover, although many experts would have us believe that the question of thimerosal and vaccine safety went away after federal agencies issued lukewarm recommendations to reduce its use as a vaccine preservative in the early 2000s, Dr. Seneff noted that thimerosal is still very much relevant.” (source) Claire I. Viadro, MPH, PhD

In summary, Dr. Seneff is pointing to the fact that many neurological diseases of the brain have a common origin, which includes an insufficient supply of sulfate to the brain. She is concluding that enhanced toxic metal exposure (aluminum) impairs the brains ability to detox itself and eliminate them. As a result, these toxic metals interfere with sulfate synthesis, create a heparan sulfate deficency which in turn leads to autism (as mentioned and pointed out with the studies cited above.) (12)

Wait, are the preventative medicine people ODing on antioxidants correct?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preventive_healthcare#Primary_prevention

I’d also like to mention that autism is comprised of a very large spectrum. Some of the ailments associated with diagnosis might not be ailments at all, but gifts that are in no way associated with vaccines. On the other hand, I do believe in some cases, characteristics that are seen in some autistic children are the cause of various toxins from pesticides to vaccines, especially children who have a genetic make up that makes them more sensitive to these chemicals. In some cases (I believe) it’s a result of these various toxins, and again, in other cases I believe it is a gift, and possibly an evolutionary step.

On an unrelated note, I’m throwing away my aluminium cookware. All of it.

fear scared woman retro

Renaming autism in the name of scientific fraud

http://www.ageofautism.com/2014/10/weekly-wrap-renaming-autism-wont-work-forever.html

“But get this quote that the authors of the law review article got from David Bowman, a spokesman for the Health Resources and Services Administration:
The court “has not compensated any cases based upon autism alone in the absence of sudden serious brain illness after vaccination,” he wrote in an email.”

red dwarf mr flibble game over boys evil puppet
That’s like saying we have ice but it isn’t water.

You’ve got to be freaking kidding me! Our whole argument is that serious brain illness – encephalopathy, about which vaccine manufacturers warn in their official product labels – leads to the behavioral syndrome called “autism.” So how is compensating autism following “sudden serious brain illness after vaccination” supposed to be a complete defense? It’s actually a signed and dated confession.

I have mentioned this before here.

For how that process could work, see here for a heavily-biological explanation. Pour yourself a drink, it’s detailed.

So, to summarize:

“Isolated” autism is not isolated – in any sense of the term, since about 1 in 68 kids in this country have it.  Thanks to William Thompson, we know on-time vaccination is a big risk.

“Idiopathic” autism (cause unknown) is not idiopathic. It doesn’t seem to show up in less vaccinated groups.

Autistic-like features following vaccination in a child with a mitochondrial anomaly does indeed add up to vaccine-induced autism.

Brain damage from vaccination that leads to autism is, in fact, vaccine-induced autism.

When are some of the smarter and more independent members of Congress, the medical profession and the mainstream media going to get with it here? Now would be good.

It’s becoming as ridiculous as man-made global warming at this point.
If you don’t know it’s fake, you don’t understand the science.
All the fake claims at this point (“herd immunity” with 99.99999999999999%, no such thing as vaccine failure, live vaccinated contagion denied) are amounting to one of the biggest frauds in history.

Also of interest —

http://www.globalresearch.ca/why-i-will-not-submit-to-medical-martial-law/5409568

The greatest danger to American citizens is, in fact, not the Ebola virus, but government reactions to the Ebola virus. Already, several medical outfits around the world are suddenly interested in producing an Ebola vaccination when no one seemed very interested before. This might sound like good news, until you learn the terrible history of modern vaccinations.

Pharmaceutical company Merck was caught red handed faking vaccine efficacy data. Merck’s Gardisil was found to contain DNA fragments of human papillomavirus.

GlaxoSmithKline, a major vaccine producer, has been caught repeatedly attempting to bribe doctors and health professionals into promoting their products or outright lying about their effectiveness. Glaxo was caught producing rotavirus vaccinations tainted with a swine virus in 2010. Glaxo has been caught producing vaccines tainted with bacteria and endotoxins.

It is important to point out that Glaxo is also spearheading an Ebola vaccine initiative.

From that prior link, here’s the hippy BS they defend it with, even though it’s been debunked.

Herd Immunity: Biss says that mass vaccination can be far more effective than individual vaccination through the principle of herd immunity. “The boundaries between our bodies begin to dissolve here… those of us who draw on collective immunity owe our health to our neighbors.” We have resistance to the idea of herd immunity as we don’t want to be compared to cows, but if we thought about our cooperation as more along the lines of hive immunity, or the wisdom of honeybees, perhaps we’d be more interested in community, as opposed to the lone wolf American individual, a loaded metaphor these days.

I can’t begin to explain how wrong that is on a legal or moral level.

Thoroughly debunked folk theory. (Hence the decimal point joke above).

When measles failed to be eradicated, public health experts decided that a 70% or 75% vaccination rate would secure herd immunity. When that proved wrong, the magic number rose to 80%, 83%, 85%, and then it became 90%, according to a 2001 Health Services Research report. Later health experts commonly cited 95%.

But that too was insufficient — measles outbreaks occur even when the vaccinated population exceeds 95%, leading some to say a 98% or 99% vaccination rate is needed to protect the remaining 1% or 2% of the herd. But even that may fall short, since outbreaks occur in fully vaccinated populations.

Huh, so, disease still happens when you vaccinate everyone…. what’s the point of vaccinating, again?

CDC cover-up MMR vaccine-autism 2004 link story

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/08/28/researcher-says-cdc-chose-to-cover-up-data-linking-autism-with-vaccines-but-theres-more-to-the-story/

A study published earlier this month re-analyzing data put out by the CDC in 2004, claims to have found a statistically significant association between autism and the age at which the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine is given to infant African-American boys. 

  • A so-called “whistleblower” alleged that the CDC covered up this data and chose to focus the 2004 study on other findings, ignoring this one. 
  • Since this more recent study claiming to associate an increased risk of autism after vaccination, more information about the study author, the whistleblower and the CDC’s original intent has come to light.
  • This more recent study was also removed from the journal, which cited ”serious concerns about the validity of its conclusions.”
  • Others criticized the study and the allegations of a CDC cover-up as well. 

A lot of money in this. Billions and Bill Gates.
If it truly was nothing, as they claim a decade after they hoped no one would ever find out, and they were being scientific as their public duty requires, they wouldn’t have hidden this finding. Instead, they buried it. The rationale to a scientist is clear: they didn’t want follow-up studies.

Here’s the study archived;

https://web.archive.org/web/20140824230839/http://www.translationalneurodegeneration.com/content/3/1/16/abstract

For PDF of FULL STUDY, CLICK HERE.

Full abstract backup; Translational Neurodegeneration 2014, 3:16  doi:10.1186/2047-9158-3-16

Background

A significant number of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder suffer a loss of previously-acquired skills, suggesting neurodegeneration or a type of progressive encephalopathy with an etiological basis occurring after birth. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectof the age at which children got their first Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine on autism incidence. This is a reanalysis of the data set, obtained from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Protection (CDC), used for the Destefano et al. 2004 publication on the timing of the first MMR vaccine and autism diagnoses.

Methods

The author embarked on the present study to evaluate whether a relationship exists between child age when the first MMR vaccine was administered among cases diagnosed with autism and controls born between 1986 through 1993 among school children in metropolitan Atlanta. The Pearson’s chi-squared method was used to assess relative risks of receiving an autism diagnosis within the total cohort as well as among different race and gender categories.

Results

When comparing cases and controls receiving their first MMR vaccine before and after 36 months of age, there was a statistically significant increase in autism cases specifically among African American males who received the first MMR prior to 36 months of age. Relative risks for males in general and African American males were 1.69 (p=0.0138) and 3.36 (p=0.0019), respectively. Additionally, African American males showed an odds ratio of 1.73 (p=0.0200) for autism cases in children receiving their first MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age versus 24 months of age and thereafter.

Conclusions

The present study provides new epidemiologic evidence showing that African American males receiving the MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age or 36 months of age are more likely to receive an autism diagnosis.