Boomer bosses

I love how nobody could deny a spiteful Boomer did this, upon seeing it.

There need to be anti-Boomer signs like: Social Security has already run out.

This came close:

I’d remind those in the US&UK, especially the universities, that there’s no such thing as a legal right to retire.

Those professors might realise their pension is just a shiny IOU, can’t have that, they might question Big Brother….

Triggered degenerate Boomers

Not to be confused with salt of the earth Boomers I hardly ever need to discuss, who aren’t hypocrites and expected their kids to listen when they gave sound health advice.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/11/young-people-drunk-acohol-millenials

Normally when you see this line.

What’s wrong with young people today?

The next sentence better be fucking good.

The Groaniad today continues:

They don’t get drunk any more

WTF.
It’s a new low in moral decay that the elders are trying desperately to corrupt their children.
Alcohol is ridiculous (social media rep), expensive, a stupid (not glamorous) legal dark grey area and an addictive distraction from the important business of networking (which we wouldn’t have to do if you didn’t import competition and switch to offshore training).
We’re told to “protect ourselves”, cannot own a gun or knife or spray in public and given the most common date rape drug is alcohol, why bother?

[see end for that topic]

Nobody wants to be blamed for their own rape or other abuse, especially in this multicultural Hell of rape gangs expressly targeting the white (what hate crime?) and drunk (predators love legal nitpicking). Clubs are losing popularity because women hate hunting grounds. Clubs exist for men and the lowest kind. Pubs more popular than ever, for comparison. Low odds of rape, groping, grinding and (especially Third World) harassment there. Naturally, the club creeps use alcohol as their excuse too. Scientifically false, drunk people can behave impeccably, as you’ll notice the second the police turn up. Other sedatives are not a free pass on assault either.

https://psmag.com/social-justice/placebo-week-getting-drunk-beer-alcohol-expectations-92254

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2634499.stm
“We have made people’s memory worse by telling them that they were intoxicated even though they had nothing stronger than plain flat tonic water with limes,” said co-researcher Maryanne Garry.
So an intake of so-called moderate alcohol wouldn’t be wise either, before someone chimes in.

Think of it as a precautionary legal defense from rapists who take advantage of slow law changes (no major interventions since Queen Victoria’s reign, and on gin) and the crawling consideration of the latest neuroscience. Sugar isn’t cocaine and alcohol doesn’t turn a law-abiding citizen into a rabid rapist, men are not naturally rapists. Nor does it bring that out as an animal instinct, society conditions excuses. You can’t take from a bank drunk and say Muh It Doesn’t Count as robbery, neither can you “take” a human being in rape and victim-blame for the “hate crime” of being white and attractive (note: imagine the pedophiles and other dedicated rapists in response* to that). This is why we need studies, psychology is not common sense. They don’t dare mention where alcohol is consumed (privately, at home) and why (visibly valid concerns about public safety relating to the new low trust society).

It isn’t about women trusting strange men (and why the hell should they? when has that ever been intelligent historically?? and do they trust their fellow random men either?*) it’s that throughout society, there is no trust. Again, why should there be? Burden of Proof. So much rape and abuse isn’t recorded or reported due to political fears of revenge that there are active reasons to distrust, fuck your snowflake feelings on the subject. Why do these broflakes feel entitled to trust they didn’t earn? Normal people (i.e. not manwhores) have lower openness scores. It’s like the funniest red handed moment “how dare you notice I only want one thing and am willing to take it unwillingly, I wanted to rape you if I could get away with it but you hurt my narc feelings, I demand satisfaction”.

Unless you’d prefer women be armed? That would be better.

Predators believe only they are real – their urges, rights etc.
The prey isn’t allowed to plan, complain or have equal HUMAN rights.

*Rapists are as real and sneaky as serial killers, simply different types of predator.

**I bet they don’t let male salesmen into their house, the paranoid sexist pigs. Straight men in gay bars don’t dare get drunk, I rest my case.

Etiquette needs to return, no talking to strangers is basic.

Teen films are fiction, there’s a crime about every five minutes, it’s normalized. Forcing someone to consume alcohol, by coercion or “slipping” covertly, aside from being illegal (directly responsible) if they have any medical issues from it you didn’t know, is poisoning. Then there are the various chemicals in alcohol that are well-known as rape drugs specifically e.g. GHB in wine. Then there’s finally on this point how women are weakened more by alcohol than men so any arguments to “she was with it” ring false from simple sex differences and accurate biology (no woman can handle alcohol, none, it’s a Hollywood myth based on the 30s vamp who’d take one single shot of a hard liquor and stop there).

Why don’t the would-be (totally not definitely never) rapists want people to defend themselves in their company by remaining of lucid consciousness? If they’re so concerned with “false” allegations? Makes you think.

Surely you’d want all women in the club not drinking so when they consent to you, it’s legally kosher. Unless of course, you’re “taking advantage”, and want them insensible, the politest term for rape we have.

And if you only sleep with brain-impaired strangers, don’t you expect allegations?
Why can’t you get your “fun” from sober people?

They try to blame the victim a sneakier way (planning legal defense months before the act itself isn’t odd?) by asking a false dichotomy and presenting a cliche anecdote that acts like the sexes are biologically the same, namely, what if they’re both drunk? The one who physically initiates is the rapist, obviously. Actus reus, look it up, idiots.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/actus_reus

They think they’ve got an AHA! moment on the “both drunk” condition but it’s the simpleton logic of pointing to a car pileup after an accident and claiming all of the cars in question caused it. Non sequitur much?

And define drunk? Given sex differences, you’re still stupid.

Back to booze

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-01-alcohol-dna-cancer.html
Alcohol causes permanent DNA damage and while older people may not care, we’re clued-up enough on science to care an awful lot. It may even pass down the germline (epigenetics).
https://newatlas.com/alcohol-cancer-dna-damage-stem-cell/52813/
Why?
Well, since we’ll be working our entire lives (retirement is a temporary fad) then staying working fit is imperative.
comment
“It concerns me how much people over a certain age brag about their alcohol intake like they don’t have a problem.”
Yes, agree, let’s all aspire to be like the alcoholic divorcees!
Definitely not addictive, is it? They can give up any time they like.
They wanted clean living kids, they got them. If they’re so triggered by the fact their children are literally better than them, their narcissism is not our problem.
Opposing the degeneracy when we see the Bacchanalian wages of it, how absolutely awful of us.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/09/28/millennials-oppose-carousing/

You’re not James Bond, we can now get those martini ingredients in the average Tesco…. Express.
We don’t want to be a burden on the State if we can possibly help it (we know about elder abuse) and neither should they?

https://drugfree.org/learn/drug-and-alcohol-news/alcohol-most-common-date-rape-drug-law-enforcement-officials-say/
https://efficientgov.com/blog/2018/04/04/what-is-the-most-common-date-rape-drug/
https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2014/sep/22/alcohol-date-rape-drug-facilitated-sexual-assault-dfsa
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071020113144.htm

It does count, and anyone who says otherwise is a willing mark in a game of Spot the Rapist. It’s a chemical that impairs the brain from threat recognition and literally weakens the physical ability to resist (fend off). It’s also most common in male rape, regardless of victim age. The law requires adjustments.

Patient children

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180625122534.htm
Another sign of K-shift. This is compared to Baby Boomers. Z to Boomer.

Maybe it’s that the Boomers aren’t raising them?

The people who invented the Esteem Movement.

Raised by cynical X or Y is better in general.

Putting pressure on a kid like a Tiger Mom or making them the centre of a marriage is abusive.

Lobsters in a bucket

https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/8m36mt/jordan_peterson_does_an_ama_drama_is_rich_as/

When your ideas would pass muster in the 60s, they’re probably Pollyanna crap-trap.

They’re desperate for establishment approval, to over-run the corrupt establishment.

And yes, I could run this entire blog in GIF form without a hitch.

OT Since nobody asks me.

Misogynists have issues with their fathers.
Misandrists have issues with their mothers.
Think about it. They identify too much uncritically with the same-sex parent. Identification is a defense mechanism because as children they lacked the authority to challenge the parent. They remain emotionally regressed and with other factors, may become disturbed e.g. rape fantasies and semen/period art.
This is standard info if you bother to ask around. They seek out unhealthy, codependent bonding with the same sex (who always seems to let them down, repetition) and rationalize this as a failure in the other, entirely, the whole group. They deny evidence as exceptions. Denial, another mechanism. Displacement of anger to other parent, as the same-sex parent did too (toxic role modelling).
They can’t fulfill their own gender role (actions) and blame the faulty connection on the opposite sex. The opposite sex becomes their externalized Shadow of pure evil. They never integrate it and seek to exorcise themselves by punishing it and its representatives (a sign of inferiority). Over time they feel worse because it’s a part of them (anima/animus) and must come to be loved.

Few reach that stage ever. They loop (repetition) and ruin their life (and other’s).
It isn’t their fault, it’s their childhood, they say.

This exonerates them of all blame and guilt (and agency and control of their life).

I just taught you what Peterson never, ever will. The secret to his success, bad fathers and misplaced angst and shame.

If penis envy is real, so too must be womb envy.

Why don’t women get involved in personality cults like Musk, Peterson, Hitchens, Dawkins? Why is it always the men? Women talk it out. Men deny, deny, deny, until their health deteriorates. Evolution programmed men for blind obedience. They rationalize this as a good thing because no woman is involved to blame. Remember, they avoid conflict with other men. Idolatry is appeasement. They can’t stand up against their father, they don’t stand for anything else (they are not men).

Guardian asks after basic maths

Boomer author, guess the ending.

As a Boomer-

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/apr/29/millennials-struggling-is-it-fault-of-baby-boomers-intergenerational-fairness

Millennials are struggling. Is it the fault of the baby boomers?

You had 10 cows, you have 20 cows.

Are you a thief?

 

.

.

.

.

.

…. Meanwhile, your neighbour is in debt for 15 cows.

Question:

How much will they hate you? (In cows)

The only calculation Boomers can do: Benefit to me = Good.

When they say the maths adds up, that’s all they mean. They’ll go to their grave swearing blind it adds up.

A Boomer saying the younger generation deserves to be robbed blind is like a rapist saying she looked up for it because she was attractive.

“But I paid into the system”

The butthurt in these comments.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/07/generation-y-pay-price-baby-boomer-pensions

TLDR:

“I worked hard for a third of my life, I can sell your teeth fillings if I want because my dad fought in the war!” – seriously, there’s one like that almost verbatim.

Lots of people buy into Ponzi schemes. 

Doesn’t make them entitled to anything though.

There is no pension pot. It’s a metaphor. It is immediately spent.

When you take out, you take from current (young) workers.

The older take out insanely more than they put in. That’s theft.

Damn do we need an update on this.

Strange, it won’t let me properly link to one of the greatest Clarey videos of all time.

It looks like a dead link.

But if you hit play, it does.

They keep doing this to my links.

Related:

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/08/27/the-1-54-boomer-riche/