Tiger Mom hypergamy + Poland sub-fertility

Poland stuff is at the end.

That was the deal. Asians aren’t Christians, they lack the altruism genes.

For richer, for poorer is an idea.

Plus, if you marry down economically for looks (hypergamy) then you entered a financial contract on the basis of your starting income. When it dips, her looks don’t change but suddenly you provide less value (plus Asian princess syndrome social shame, saving face stigma pressure to leave) so she’ll retract her end and cash out before you go completely bust. Collectivists are not individualists. They value what you give, not family ties. They ghost their own blood relations.

The pretend naivete is most insulting. The focus is not husband (like Christianity) but kids. Guy’s a glorified sperm donor, they don’t actually respect you (why the aged Asian shrew henpecking her husband and beating kids with a shoe is infamous) it’s all about looking the part (communal narcissism).

Stupid beta doesn’t know she planned her exit, like timing the market.

She wanted little meal ticket to take back to Japan.

Bear in mind, mix Asian/White marriages have higher rates of domestic abuse (it could come from her) but also divorce, compared to Asian/Asian, so you couldn’t do better.

“Non-confrontational” – passive-aggressive

“kept to herself” – hated you

“misunderstandings with parents” – hated the people with your best interests at heart, attempt to isolate you from them (she related to Jolie?)

“she viewed explanations as arguments” – so…. Asian, culturally. They just repeat bullshit until you cave. Then they fake-out walking away only to come back a few times. The only thing most of them don’t do is stamp their feet. They’re not used to being told “No”. Narcs view normal boundaries e.g. don’t shout in my ear, as offensive to them.

“if I took an hour a day to explain” – she isn’t that stupid, nobody is

“she avoided it” stonewalling, another Asian specialty, again they freeze out relatives with bad reputation socially for trivial or even good reasons like individuality or not paying the family leech

Someone please school the Asian betas, this is absurd.

“I knew this, I specifically told her – you cannot save up your anger” it’s called resentment and it’s the biggest predictor of divorce, don’t marry a spiteful bitch, however nice the mask beforehand

Well, she got her revenge, didn’t she?

Seriously though I’m on his side. Anyone writing a special course on spotting Dark Triad in Asian women would make billions off that market. They fake their femininity until hubby looks insecure, then like any predator they strike to draw first blood. Narcs, for example, always assume you’ll betray them. She wasn’t expecting to die with him, hence withdrawing from his family, keeping distance so they had no info on her or emotional rapport.

Guy was played.

She married millionaire, then made bank. Gold digger.

He tolerated her passivity as femininity, probably, meaning he would later allow her to do a runner and never combat divorce proceedings. She knew this. She tested him for weakness for YEARS.

He learned nothing, he’s still talking about “initial attraction”. That excitement is mutually exclusive to compatibility. The fun ones are always crazy. Never fuck anyone crazier than you. The attraction is a bait, an act, totally a facade, their persona when you meet is FAKE as Bella Hadid’s tits. They mirror you and mould into your perfect One. BPDs and HPDs go further with cheating tests (while cheating themselves to see if you’re jealous), sadistic punishments and all sorts.

Personality disorder people are attractive in the same way as standing at a cliff edge- because of your death drive, intrigued by DANGER. Stop crossing the wires, guys! Are they: fascinating, individually, or fucked-up, mentally? Critical difference.

This is my PSA to advice I’d give male relatives, I’m in no danger zone and see a very different side to these women (Mean Girls). There’s no mask because there’s no gain from a woman (competition), it’s the real spite up front.

They isolate women for professional reasons, men for personal gain.

I’ve missed out of tons of opportunities because some bitch randomly hated me. I want you to thwart them. Women have no avenue. At least don’t be a chump?

He goes on about communication but did NONE of that himself. He still married her. He allowed her to be non-cooperative then married her.

“We would just – have fun”

Good-time girls make great ex-wives….

“if we thought there was anything we didn’t understand about the other person we just – ignored that stuff”

all his talk about communication was bullshit, then

that’s not a wife material you propose to, that’s an acquaintance you fuck

you don’t even do that to friends, but an awkward colleague – no emotional intimacy

deep down, he sensed they weren’t compatible, spiritually, amazing how men think with their dick

almost like you’re meant to make this decision with a clearer…. head

“If you understand the core of a person, that is always there”

but you just said-

you married a stranger you fuckwit

Narcissists don’t HAVE a core, either! Hollow people exist! Soulless people exist! People dead on the inside capable of faking it…. exist!

This gentlemen, is why men had arranged marriages. Your parents could see this shit a mile off and head off your impaired dick brain disorder.

The more he talks, the more I wanna punch him. He’s so vapid.

“If you marry for social status or appearance” – there’s some self-awareness there, scratching to get out!

ALAS NO.

He still thinks she has a core…. despite still not knowing it…

There’s nothing to know, idiot.

I’ve gone on dates with this kind of guy (one date, each) in the past because they actually got scared when a woman had emotional intelligence enough to express her dark side openly. They’d be scared of the girl who can clearly, politely communicate they’re annoyed by something but later you see them with a series of crazy bitches (their words, after) who put on the nice airhead act only to be rotten in reality and it’s like… wow. Actually they kinda deserve it. Women are not sugar and spice, get it through your thick skull, this isn’t an Austen novel. If a woman isn’t saying it, she’s thinking it …and that’s VERY dangerous – to you. Because rest assured, the talkative sex (a myth but OK) has a REASON for not voicing it – and that’s usually predatory.

Dating is meant to filter out bad matches early as possible. If you want fake, you get fake. With fake longevity.

Like, how do they expect a marriage should work? You never disagree? You can’t have an adult conversation? You can’t voice frustrations with anything, personally or politically? Do they think women knit away their anger? Does that sound healthy compared to a productive, sometimes fun talk? Vive la difference can be attractive. If they want a clone without the dick, they’re too insecure to marry anyone. Did they never learn the value of confrontation as a child? It teaches compromise. It establishes and protects boundaries, it respects both parties. You need to learn how to argue to fight your corner. Anger isn’t a bad emotion per se, it’s vital for survival. Do they want a codependent or apathetic ninny? Would she stand by them or get weak and panic when times get tough? They always do over decades. Have they ever spoken to successful, long-married couples? No.

Because if they did it’s about loyalty and that seems ferocious, sometimes. Passion isn’t for weaklings.

Marriage is the union of two individuals. You are not a jigsaw piece. Conflict happens. That’s why you state a vow publicly that you stand together and ENDURE the conflict.

A person who thinks you’re worth the argument will work on the marriage. This waifu clearly had no investment in him emotionally, she was probably incapable of it with any man – best to learn that early on? Can they securely attach? Men and women don’t do that lightly. Ya gotta earn it.

She literally pouted and hid like a small infant. He left her alone to mope like a dog, so he’s thick too. You can’t marry that and logically expect her to magically mature! She was emotionally retarded! Literally! That doesn’t just Go Away with pressure!

The why can’t girls be honest lot run when regular women are…. into the arms of… LIARS!

That’s…. that’s what happens. Good riddance if the idiots and the bitches leave the dating pool, actually. Maybe I shouldn’t observe, but I’ve heard the same from guys about idiot cousins, bitchy sisters etc.

The passive strategy (ghosting emotionally, stonewalling) is common among these women because with every interaction you might see their tactics, hear a word that sounds off-key or see a mask slip. They’re minimizing exposure to the prey while timing the attack.

Graham is earlier on in the same cycle. Loner guy openly brags he’s a millionaire and BOOM magically meets his soulmate…. sure. Sure you did.

Marry her too. Kids. The works. ….Morons. She’s mirroring you and your delusions of independence.

It’s like that pure cringe Talulah Riley video that was basically a meme, until the vid was taken down (and later re-posted) – the one in the kitchen where she slipped up and mask-slipped, saying she’d have married anyone who proposed quickly.

His feels were hurt but watch her eyes and sudden awkwardness. You can see the “I fucked up, damage control” in her face as she blinks heavily, face gets all twitchy, body all stiff, as she tries to decide what her face SHOULD look like and what her tone of voice SHOULD be and what line she SHOULD say to make him think she’s capable of empathy again.

IT’S THE SAME SHIT.

MEN WHY. 

top comment:

1) Complains about being his wife and dealing with his kids (wouldn’t wish taking care of them on her worst enemy)

2) Said she would have accepted a proposal from anybody

3) Says her parents were traumatized by “This whole experience”

4) Talks about how she’s thought of leaving him many times

MANOSPHERE TEACHES YOU NONE OF THIS SHIT. It isn’t even race-specific although they do vary the MO somewhat according to stereotype. This makes it easier to convince you of things, like to trust them.

I love how the next clip they cut to is his sportscar and she gets a ton of presents in a tower of boxes. Wow. The video editor was answering the reason she stayed with him with visual storytelling, it was Python-esque.

I treasure it. Unsung hero.

SPOT THE FAKE FEMININITY, PLEASE. The fewer crazy bitch divorce cases I hear about, the better.

e.g. all 4 explained:

previously claimed in an interview she wanted ten kids, balks and scoffs contemptuously, glares at and avoids five

soulmate mirroring ops, slips with the anybody (who’s a billionaire) entitlement

sides with her parents over him and Them… while engaged, in lovey dopamine phase?

frequent escapist fantasies…. during key pair bonding and prime attachment time

Get the body language youtuber to study this video, seriously.

A woman with empathy says

How did she say all those stuff in front of his face like that….

She doesn’t respect him. He’s a middle-aged guy trying to marry a lingerie model. Age gap women never really respect the old coot. Open contempt. He’s mentally messed-up as she is and he’s fair game since he’s a perv, she knows he deserves it (sociopath logic). He’s leaving the mother of his children, why would she respect him?

WHY do you think Cinderella Effect is a STUDIED phenomena?

Women don’t want another woman’s kids, they’re considered like bastards. They want their own to come first. A woman interested in Stepmother is probably dangerous.

No prizes for guessing how many kids they have together now. [zero]

comment

how blind is this guy its clearly a thot

Jewish thot. They age… poorly. Even with the surgical interventions.

Her eyes are practically shrinking into her skull like Sid from Ice Age but men look at T/A so …. okay. She’s aged like Natalie Portman but two decades early. Now she leaks gossip about the singer to websites to force them to break up so he’ll marry her again. Common MO with this type. Gossip manufacture and leakage. The call is coming from inside the house!

comment

That’s what happens when you date someone purely on looks who has a shit personality. Ask yourself if you weren’t rich would she still be with you, if the answer is no then it’s time to move on.

Looks or the fact she’s a model version of your ex to parade around as an upgrade and you asked her to dye her hair to match? Saving face to the ex cost him to lose it eventually.

Nobody in London rated her as a model. Or an actress, for that matter. Cunty personality and no talent. With all his influence she got a smirk role in a Thor film. It was hilarious. She’s like a Hollywood 4. Everyone who knew her from her many schools (she wanted to move) was pissing themselves.

Learn the type, men. Study it like a samurai. Jumped-up public schoolgirl.

1:22 for the OOPS face, look in HD.

Reaches out to touch his arm, sexual distraction. Make him believe her lie more as she arse-covers. Feminine wiles are fine but get a bad rap when used deceitfully. You’re meant to use them in cooperation as a married couple. He is angry and shouts at the kids and you talk him down, that stuff.

For when the vid is taken down, educational purposes, SLOW-MO.

Okay or just that clip, it’s like a car crash anyway. It seems slow-mo.

A vital part of protecting marriage is cutting off the gold diggers.

The manosphere seems to have missed this part, assuming gold diggers stick around. No. You can’t “alpha frame” them into tolerating you.

Listen to Graham’s Pollyanna optimism and never sound like that.

Candy comments

Living with the parents but telling your wife dont interact with them? Stevie Wonder could see that divorce coming.

comment

why tf were they still living with controlling parents?! youre married, get a house. im positive she left cause he didnt want to move out of his parents place

comment

This is disgusting. We don’t know her side. And this guy seems like a true narcissist. I’ve seen his other video. The “millionaire” buys his wife a $20 gift and takes her to the same restaurant when she was not happy. The guy desreves a wakeup fist.

I think they’re both narcissists.

Jap comments

Japanese (both male and female) tend to avoid confrontation at all costs, while build up anger and resentment and having a difficulty of expressing their thought logically. For her, going back to Japan with a son to raise with her parents and in familiar environment seems no brainer. It is selfish decision though, by doing so gradually influence the son to be and think more like her. In Japan, it is very common that “ex-husband is ex-father”, hardly keep any contact with his kids, either by him or her or mutual. It’s unhealthy for the child but neither sides willing or capable to have a conversation to raise their kids together as an adult, in my opinion.

That’s Asian in general.

He didn’t say about missing the kid, there’s something mentally wrong with him.

Guy says to someone

I changed when I went from being unemployed, to getting a job — we stopped traveling so much. My ex changed when we had a child. In Japanese culture, the woman stops being a wife and becomes a selfless mother at that point. (That’s my perception at least) and its’ believed there is honor in that. I tend to think a good mother should demonstrate love to her husband to teach family values.

It’s believed? That’s the culture you married.

He doesn’t tend to think at all. Wow.

I never forced her to live there, she agreed to. Her belief that with money we could move out immediately caused issues, because we were trying to buy a house and that takes time to close. We started bidding on any random house haphazardly (even burned down houses that would cost a ton to rebuild) because we were becoming desperate. And housing in the Bay Area is so competitive we lost all of our bids.

comment

Clearly he paid more attention to he’s job/YouTube than his wife… obvious result

He could be a psychopath. It’s possible. Still, there was deception in there somewhere although…. why sign? Did she have proof of abuse? She isn’t monetizing it.

If you won’t put the spouse above your vanity and career then don’t get married. Goes for men too. No “boys”, the loyalty is to family first or it will break down, eventually. Boys leave, your wife and kids are by your death bed.

Then again, Asia has a ton of hypergamy at the moment. In the West it ended in the 20th century, when studied.

They say when the earner loses money, divorce occurs. Cashing out.

Hypergamy and materialism of both sexes is reducing birth rates.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition

This is normal if r-types are shifting from r.

Between 1750 and 1975 England experienced the transition from high levels of both mortality and fertility, to low levels. A major factor was the sharp decline in the death rate due to infectious diseases, which has fallen from about 11 per 1,000 to less than 1 per 1,000. By contrast, the death rate from other causes was 12 per 1,000 in 1850 and has not declined markedly. The agricultural revolution and the development of transport, initiated by the construction of canals, led to greater availability of food and coal, and enabled the Industrial Revolution to improve the standard of living. Scientific discoveries and medical breakthroughs did not, in general, contribute importantly to the early major decline in infectious disease mortality.”

Atheists lie about that too.

But I’m sure STDs are a hidden factor in Asian infertility, also.

wikipedia generally: “In some countries the population is declining, especially in Eastern Europe, mainly due to low fertility rates, high death rates and emigration.”

Maybe selling their nubile women to cartels as blonde rape victims or sending them to work in brothels doesn’t help.

” Some Western Europe countries might also experience population decline.[22]

So we’re fine, contextually, Eastern Europe is screwed. They rely on large families for various cultural reasons. It keep their economy afloat.

e.g.

http://www.msp.gov.pl/en/polish-economy/economic-news/6146,Poland-facing-risk-of-labor-force-deficit-in-2015.html

They’re not family-oriented AT ALL.

Poland – a country with a fertility rate lower than China

“Poland has a very low fertility rate, lower than the majority of European countries. There is a clear cultural difference – not so much in the level of wealth, but in the quality of life.”

Yeah gotta pay that Sky TV bill on UK welfare sent abroad (really).

“In most of the other countries of Central and Eastern Europe which once belonged to this group, the fertility rate was lower than in the countries of Western and Southern Europe in this group”

“In addition, 22 per cent simply do not want to have a child.”

Actual Polish women, not propaganda you see on Youtube.

“According to the Social Diagnosis for 2015, some 2 million people could have a child, but are prevented from that, mainly by material conditions and the lack of support in childcare. For the most affluent people, the real issue lies not in genuine financial scarcity, but in aspirations and the desire to ensure a sufficiently high standard of living for the children.”

Without the national IQ to produce value and real wealth, so welfare. Gibs.

https://data.oecd.org/pop/young-population.htm#indicator-chart

Oh yeah, their economy’s gonna be great.

The young are on strike

until the Boomers die off and/or the economy improves.

I have been saying this since Best Post in 2014 and even before then.

It is Christian to punish the wicked system with non-compliance. Jesus turned the other cheek. They also say about “sparing” us the suffering of marriage, if it can be avoided.

“Are you free of commitment? Do not look for a wife.” – 1 Cor 7:27

I’m tired of fake Christians lying about this, it’s American Churchian bullshit that everyone should marry as God’s Will. There aren’t even enough women mathematically to go around if you forced everyone to marry at the point of a shotgun regardless of low IQ, homosexuality, infertility, poverty etc. Stop lying. What you say or imply is impossible and immoral.

“But those who marry will face troubles in this life,and I want to spare you this.” 1 Cor 7 again

There are no simple solutions, the birth rate is a SYMPTOM itself.

Whites are meant to have a K-select birth rate anyway.

There is no reason to invest in a system stealing your resources to fund the dysgenic families of others. There is no reason to produce kids that will be encouraged to take puberty blockers and learn about anal in year 1. There is no reason to settle with men who have whored around in Thailand with children and feel entitled to a “good girl” after deflowering and abandoning multiple of them years prior. They can’t even morally lead themselves, as adult individuals, let alone sons and daughters, whom they’d lead astray with weakness. Men have no moral authority in this era, based on their actions. Women do not respect modern men and the disgust is earned i.e. the fuckboy and manchild thing are valid objections by women. You’re white and acting like ghetto shit, stop it.

Why did 53% of white women vote Trump? Why did Leave win? Women want men to sort out the country and that must happen before they start doing their part re family. You have to clean the soil before planting seeds and the West is plagued with weeds and worse, locust.

By all means, mock Emma Watson – but I got there first.

However, nobody tells her how to find a good man.

Or which system she should marry in.

Or how many kids is optimal for the marriage.

s i l e n c e 

So none of you are actually contributing intellectually. Negative nancies add nothing. Women already get shamed by the (((SJWs))) when they voice that pressure where they want a family, you’re helping them.

As it is, there is a systemic movement, rarely spoken by the middle class journo class.

We’re (young white people) deliberately starving out the zombie socialist pension ponzi. Good.

Let it burn. That’s exactly what we want. Don’t threaten us with a good time.

This is how women rebel in particular, passively. If you’re gonna burn down a house, do you renovate the kitchen?

No, no you fucking do not.

Just ask various women: “Honestly, are women putting off marriage and kids until men get their act together?”

Listen to the steady stream of well thought-out complaints.

We’ve seen women, perfect wives, dumped in middle age for Ting Tong. Who’d bother? Or women left with nothing because, staying at home, they couldn’t afford a lawyer. Women abandoned because their husband died without life insurance (or they didn’t pay) and he vainly didn’t want her with a good CV out the home so now the kids are on welfare. Why bother? Men have failed. Women discuss these failures openly, in bathrooms with strangers all the way to at events, we compare notes on how men we’ve seen or heard of socially are failing as patriarchs. It isn’t gossip, it’s strategy.

Even the Guardian types are now in gnosis:

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2018/nov/20/can-anyone-retire-in-their-30s-meet-the-people-who-say-yes

https://www.theguardian.com/membership/2017/jan/23/saving-retirement-pension-generation-old-age

https://www.theguardian.com/membership/2017/mar/29/a-world-without-retirement

The host is cutting off the leeches. Even Labour MPs don’t want to send their kids to diverse schools.

The rebellion is righteous, good and moral. We’re fucking the sinners over by going Galt.

Hate what is evil, cling to what is good” style.

The actual Bible, Ecc 4:

“I saw the tears of the oppressed—
and they have no comforter;
power was on the side of their oppressors—
and they have no comforter.
2 And I declared that the dead,
who had already died,
are happier than the living,
who are still alive.
3 But better than both
is the one who has never been born,
who has not seen the evil
that is done under the sun.

Not having kids isn’t a sin or Jesus would be a sinner. You’re not better than Jesus for fucking some slag at a party while high. You are not God, as some arrogant men on this topic try to pervert or add to the Word. Do not make a vow to God you will not keep, don’t get married just to say you have like some vapid CA twat. You don’t know Christianity better than Jesus. Having kids isn’t a sign of morality, especially with the deadbeats and ghetto people doing it now. Young people are aware of the things their Boomer or Gen X parents shamed them for – being too loud or expensive or interrupting their “fun” or “ruining their life”, and presently stopping that cycle of abuse. Good. Don’t have kids you can’t afford, we need to sink back to pre-WW demographic levels and composition anyway.

The secret of change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the old, but on building the new” – Socrates.

Like Vox Day has said, white demographics are fine, historically. Eternal growth is cancer, food for socialist lampreys. They’ll fail eventually and do you want to be personally responsible for four, five kids when that happens? These same guys bitching muh sub-replacement balk at child support for one kid, STFU. You’re not a man then if you don’t want 100% of your gender role as provider. If the woman puts in her 100% by having the kids, you gotta pay for her to stay with them. That’s the point of marriage. Historically, some people didn’t breed and it was fine as long as they weren’t the brave WW lot, conned by bankers. We must focus on incentives, punishing the stupid actively and encouraging quality parents. Encouraging dysgenic higher birth rates is actually the white genocide, it pressures the system whites rely on (in their homeland) with foreigners and idiots.

It’s funny there are people deluded enough to think humans will always exist anyway, evolution is useful but not a purpose. The Bible explicitly says God will wipe us out anyway, at some point, the genetic legacy male argument is futile and won’t sway women. Women care about husband quality and enjoying that, kids are just part of the marriage. Women marry for the man. Stop kidding yourself.

There might be a war soon, we’re overdue. Food prices are going up, making home economics useless. The economy is stagnating from the idiot parasite load. Who wants more mouths to feed? At this time? The only people I’ve seen planning kids soon are morons. They feel entitled to the earnings of everyone else… it won’t end well.

4 And I saw that all toil and all achievement spring from one person’s envy of another.”

Where’s the incentive? If the game is rigged, wait until a new one comes along.

Let it burn.

Would you work under Communism? Well we have demographic Communism. Let them fail.

They wanted this revolution, this system of sodom, this evil.

This is the world you wanted, globalist socialists! You don’t get to moan!

Better not to have kids than abort them like a Boomer. Anti-natal involves sleeping around with no reproduction, it isn’t a person minding their own business and being …human, more than vain, rutting beast. Nobody I know wants their kids growing up in a diverse area, even in their homeland. It’s a silent strike. There are Boomers who actually feel entitled to demand their kids go into lifelong debt so they can have grandkids, who’d inherit that debt, despite getting money from their own parents to set up and breed. The social contract is dead. The practical intelligence (phronesis) comes in, young people are not stupid and can barely stay afloat for economic reasons, thanks to decades of multicultural policies and colonies voted in by the exact retards kvetching about birth rates. Fuck you, it’s your fault.

The birth rate won’t “improve” until 1. Boomers retire so young people can earn enough to set up 2. men are held accountable for kids they produce, many here don’t pay child support so…. why have kids, even in marriage? even marriage itself is no security so women are scared to breed, they also see the shorter lifespan for women in marriage and male abandonment for a younger model being enabled… why invest? Why? Men don’t commit. 3. no more hook-up culture as the bait on the hook to women that they must be whores to get male attention to maybe possibly get married and have a family. Eggs are expensive, stop trying to flip gender roles into women impressing effeminate losers who think they’re the shit for being worthless degenerates. Women are on strike especially. Women have a genetic legacy in siblings and cousins. This is why women care-take post-menopause while men become useless compared to the young competition (even military is a brutal Wall) and get various “mysterious” health problems with higher mortality (abandoning wife and kids that way) or just self-murder. Men want a genetic legacy personal to them but refuse to admit they need women (the ew cooties mgtow) or actually appreciate them for it so…. I guess your line dies with you? Who wants to give everything to a person who despises them? Femininity isn’t weak or evil.

Who wants to have kids to feed the Beast?

Whether it’s the fiat system throttling us on a timer or the rape gang Muslims down the street?

White people have a beautiful form of revenge, we will happily cut our nose off to spite our face. The left fears it, fears being cut off the host, shrieks when white people retreat. Fuck ’em.

We don’t have to just Go Along with your plans to destroy us, (((Activist))).

We’re not queuing up -with kids in tow- for the white gulag. This is siege warfare.

Multicultural societies have a lower birth rate because women are expecting and awaiting a war. Gladly. With no national security, the cultural shamed, people cowed and weak men literally inviting barbarians to take our ancestors’ gifts to us, why invest in the men who allowed this?

None of you hand-rubbing sadists happy about Mz “Self-Partnered” can answer me that question.

Whether she’s aware of it or not, this is how women actually work. We want a war. That caused your Baby Boom last century, remember?

This is how history and women actually operate. We breed with winning genes, not losers avoiding a fight like a PC damsel.

And don’t make the WW1/2 banker “mistake” of leaving the weak dysgenic men at home, the purpose is a cull of weak genes. Then you’ll get your birth rates up. Just look at the fashions of the time – pin-up. That’s what women want to be if you bring them war. We shouldn’t have to ask for it, that’s part of the test. Men are supposed to want to protect their nation. Then women protect their genes into the next generation. That’s the way around, we’re not the ones failing to pull our gender weight among young, fertile people. Men move first to make society safe, whether or not they know a “good one”. It’s an insult to us that you allow colonialism to continue. The women are nubile, the men ineffectual. Why don’t women want them? Why does Prince Charming always fight somebody in fairytales, and kill for her, if you wanna be Peterson about this?

Wake up.

Women are eugenic in the choice to breed and who with. Women don’t actually care about a genetic legacy, for themselves. At least slag off bachelors and spinsters properly. There are good reasons (religious, national, economic) for the choice, bad reasons (global warming, white guilt, SJWism – probably a cover for the same instincts) and those for whom it isn’t a choice, they have their ducks in a row (no survival priorities) and they’re desperately searching, like Emma and all the bitter MGTOWs who were in fact rejected by women (all women) first. This is Darwin 101 – sexual selection is a eugenic culling force. FEATURE, NOT A BUG. Better to have no kids, than invest in shit tier kids who’d get you killed in a war. Then there’s Red Army rape considerations if the children are a little older. Women sense civil unrest coming. It simply isn’t safe.

Divorce risk x IQ

Don’t marry the bimbo.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228480875_Is_there_a_relation_between_divorce_risk_and_intelligence_Evidence_from_the_Netherlands

Should also look at spousal IQ disparity.

Presumably, bigger = higher % divorce.

In ‘The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life’, Herrnstein and Murray reported a negative relation between intelligence and divorce risks. This article analyses the relationship between intelligence and divorce risks for two different Dutch cohorts, for which data on their intelligence measured during their childhood, are available. A positive relation between intelligence and divorce risk is found for the Dutch fifty-year-olds born around 1940. Among this older cohort, divorced respondents have a higher mean intelligence score than respondents who stayed together with their spouses. However, a negative relation between intelligence and divorce risk is found for the Dutch thirty-year-olds born around 1958. Among this younger cohort, divorced respondents have a lower mean intelligence than respondents who stayed together. A possible explanation of the shift is that the democratisation of divorce over time has altered the nature of divorce from a highly selective to a more normal event.

Or r-types stopped marrying as much, from pressure. Therefore, fewer divorces.

Beware fake trad man

I’m not naming names but sudden engagements are doomed to misery.

https://www.bolde.com/14-little-things-look-like-love-actually-manipulation/

7. HE WANTS TO START A FAMILY. This is obviously a normal, lovely thing to want, but watch how it’s done. If his goal is to have a family so that you can quit working and stay at home with the baby, in a home far away from where your loved ones are, it could be part of his plan to isolate you and take control of your life: he’ll be controlling your whereabouts, your finances and everything else soon enough.

10. HE TELLS YOU HOW MUCH BETTER YOU ARE THAN OTHER WOMEN. You might see it as a compliment when he says all his exes were psychotic but you’re so much better than them. Hey, maybe you’re the best woman he’s ever met. These can be compliments, but not if he’s showing signs of being sexist and discriminatory. He might say, “Women are so [insert negative adjective here], but you’re not like them.” Um, hello? You’re a woman! It’s damn insulting.

etc.

Husband selection is more important than just getting married.

A chimp could get married in Vegas – probably.

I have a pet theory these women become this type after a few years.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/07/17/the-scourge-of-the-bitter-mother/

The second line is a definite indicator of abuse.

Sometimes handcuffs look like wedding rings, bitches.

12. HE SUGGESTS THINGS “FOR YOUR OWN GOOD.” He cares about you so much that he’ll show you a better way to do your job, speak to your best friend, make a cup of tea and even lose those extra pounds (that you didn’t even notice). It’s not for your own good at all — it’s his way of controlling you. But screw that, you’re a grown woman who can damn well decide what’s best for you.

This isn’t Build-a-Bitch.

If he doesn’t want to marry you, he doesn’t want to marry Y O U.

If you’re really that incompetent, he shouldn’t be attracted.

Mixed race divorce and domestic abuse

I’m back. I decided to qualify the end of the last post. For shiggles.
Yes, there is data. I’m cracking down hard on the weebs.

“Marital Dissolution Among Inter-racial Couples”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4183451/

“Increases in interracial marriage have been interpreted as reflecting reduced social distance among racial and ethnic groups, but little is known about the stability of interracial marriages. Using six panels of Survey of Income and Program Participation (N = 23,139 married couples), we found that interracial marriages are less stable than endogamous marriages, but these findings did not hold up consistently. After controlling for couple characteristics, the risk of divorce or separation among interracial couples was similar to the more-divorce-prone origin group. Although marital dissolution was found to be strongly associated with race/ethnicity, the results failed to provide evidence that interracial marriage is associated with an elevated risk of marital dissolution.”

This is like saying cars don’t kill people, brakes do.

“As the U.S. population has grown increasingly diverse, it is important to update prior research to include interracial marriages involving Asians and Hispanics, especially given that they are more likely to intermarry (with non-Hispanic Whites) than are Blacks”

so if you’re so concerned about race, screeching at the weebs is your duty. Mudsharks already hate themselves. Asiaphiles are oddly proud of it.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=asiaphile
“The term applies to a non-Asian person particularly a white man who has yellow fever. Thinks all Asian chicks are hot, usually can’t tell the difference between a homely and a cute one just as long as she is Asian.”

I’ve posted about that before. Dick-blind.

It’s the baby prostitute of Mean Girls fame!

Thousands of years of evolution down the drain. Bet his WW2-fighting grandparents would be proud.

“In their study of multiracial identification among those with Black, Asian, or Hispanic backgrounds, Lee and Bean (2007) found that those with Black backgrounds more consistently identified as Black and not multiracial (similar to the “one-drop” rule as applied in the past), whereas those with Hispanic and, especially, Asian backgrounds exhibited more flexibility and choice in racial/ethnic identification and were more likely to identify as multiracial. Lee and Bean (2007) concluded that these patterns illustrated the salience of the color line that continues to divide Blacks from non-Blacks in U.S. society.”

So the existential risk to team white is team yellow.
If you’re being scientific.

“The homogamy perspective predicts that interracial marriages will be less stable than same-race marriages. Thus, Black-White marriages are expected to be more likely to divorce than either Black or White endogamous marriages; similarly, Asian-White marriages are expected to be more likely to divorce than either Asian or White endogamous marriages. The homogamy perspective further leads to the expectation that the stronger the racial boundary of the two groups represented in the couple, the greater the risk of divorce. Thus, Black-White marriages are expected to be at greater risk of divorce than Hispanic-White or Asian-White marriages.”

Although there is a speculated convergence (I’d guess once you control for class/money) that is similar to mixed race IQ being the mean of both sub-par parents (and so dragged lower).

“For example, he found that Chinese-White couple divorce rates fell somewhere in between divorce rates of Chinese and White endogamous marriages.”
“Similarly, Hispanic-White and Asian-White marriages would be expected to be more likely to dissolve than Hispanic or Asian endogamous marriages but less likely than White endogamous marriages”

But that hypothesis isn’t what actually happens and it’d be a more dramatic shift if you removed the religious couples from consideration, only counting those who could be allowed to divorce.

Atheists are more likely to divorce overall, but it’s hard to find studies.
Are they more likely to race mix? Probably.

OT

“Therefore, according to the ethnic convergence hypothesis, immigrant-native marriages would be expected to have divorce risks that fall between those of immigrant-immigrant marriages and native-native marriages. Also, if Hispanic and Asian interracial marriages are less likely to divorce, this could be because so many of these marriages involve immigrants. After controlling for immigration characteristics, the effects of interracial marriage should diminish for these couples”

Another thing to control, desperation to retain citizenship.

“To assess the homogamy and ethnic convergence hypotheses, it is important to control for correlated factors. Individual-level socioeconomic and demographic characteristics are associated with interracial marriage and are important predictors of divorce.”

Gold diggers gonna dig.

“Finally, while having young child(ren) has been shown to increase marital stability, this effect often decreased as the child(ren) grew older (Cherlin, 1977).”

Babies won’t protect you (actually they stress a marriage, especially if had too soon).

“In addition to the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of individuals, it is critical to control for couple-level characteristics.”

Dare you to count 10-score sexual attractiveness compared to their in-group.

That would burn.

“The homogamy perspective stresses that partner differences in any socially significant characteristics—not just race—may increase the risk of divorce, and spouses in interracial couples may differ on multiple characteristics. For example, Tucker and Mitchell-Kernan (1990) found that the age gap was larger for interracially married couples than other couples. Partners in interracial couples may also differ with respect to nativity and citizenship. Interracial marriages between immigrants and U.S.-born natives may be at greater risk of divorce because of partner differences in their reasons for entering the relationship.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Prostitution is a reason.

Kalmijn et al. (2005) found that larger cultural differences between the husband and wife increased the risk of divorce.

Breaking news: water, wet.

In addition, marriage to U.S. citizens may serve as a legal means to immigrate for many foreigners.

For that reason, no, it isn’t legal, and the other spouse has also broken the law by using that to gain power too. Technically the marriage wouldn’t count, since it was conditional as duress to defraud their nation (so also treason).

Such marriages may be motivated by the desire to obtain U.S. citizenship rather than love or companionship, as evidenced in many cases in France (Neyrand & M’Sili, 1998) and the Netherlands (Kalmijn et al., 2005).”

I ain’t sayin’ she a gold digger.. but she reaching for that green card n—er.

“Finally, group-level characteristics, such as marriage cohort, region of residence, religion, and women’s changing status, may be associated with divorce or separation (Trent & South, 1989). For example, interracial marriage has been more prevalent in the West than other parts of the country (Tucker & Mitchell-Kernan, 1990), and marital instability has been more common in the West than other regions, although this relationship has varied by race (Sweeney & Phillips, 2004) and has weakened over the years (Castro Martin & Bumpass, 1989).”

Because less get married in the first place!

The majority (93.5%) of the couples in our sample were endogamous, including 77.4% White-White, 6.4% Black-Black, 7% Hispanic-Hispanic, and 2.7% Asian-Asian couples. The remaining 6.5% of couples were interracially married (including 1% White-Black, 3.5% White-Hispanic, and 1.4% White-Asian pairings, as well as 0.6% of all types of minority-minority marriages combined).

There are far more total Asian-White couples than White-Black, if you’re going to criticize anyone.

1% mulatto vs. 4.9% genetic Asian admixture. Who’s the, ahem, “race traitor?”

Consistent with prior studies (e.g., Qian, 1997), there are distinct racial/ethnic differences in being in an interracial marriage (results not shown). Blacks are substantially less likely than Hispanics or Asians to have a White spouse (10.1% vs. 23.5% and 24.6%, respectively).”

Africans aren’t stealing da white wimmin.

Statistically. This isn’t the 19th century. Your assumptions are outdated.

Over one third of interracial couples (34.5%) involved a foreign-born person married to a U.S. native compared with just 4.2% of endogamous couples.”

Yeah. She a gold digger.
Isn’t that slave ownership?

Most slaves are sex slaves.
Made obvious in the final study here. What happens when a slave gets out of line?

“Consistent with the first homogamy hypothesis, interracial marriages are less stable: 13.7% of interracial couples compared with 9.9% of endogamous couples broke up during their SIPP panel.”

Duh.

“The descriptive results also confirm the second homogamy hypothesis in which mixed-race couples involving the most socially distant groups (e.g., Blacks and Whites) were most likely to break up: nearly 20% of Black-White couples divorced or separated compared with 13.5% of Hispanic-White couples and 8.4% of Asian-White couples.”

Hispanics are genetic Asian, that data is rigged.

Total Asian-White divorce should be 10.95%.

They should also break down by sex, so Asian Male, White Female or White Male, Asian Female for specific divorce risk per individual by demo.
If they controlled for IQ distance between the couples, that’d explain most of the divorce. Hard to steer a marriage when one party is pedaling backwards.

“For Asians, however, the results were consistent with the ethnic convergence hypothesis”

No you tortured the statistics into excluding most of the Asian population in America.
Shell games don’t impress me.

“Roughly 8.3% of Asian-White couples separated or divorced, a level that falls between the relatively high rates for White couples and the relatively low rates among Asian couples (1.4%).”

You said 8.4 earlier.

8.4/1.4 = 6x (times) the average intra-racial Asian divorce risk thanks to Asian-European miscegenation?
And they think that’s a good finding. Don’t piss down my back and tell me it’s raining Zhang.

So this isn’t even good for the Asians with white fever. Since they’re marrying the dregs. They can’t even say it’s better for waifu.

“This may be a consequence of potential problems facing interracial couples including stress, social disapproval, and cultural differences. Furthermore, interracial couples differ from endogamous couples in important ways that may elevate the risk of divorce (such as greater age and education differences between spouses). To test this idea, we turn next to the multivariate hazards models.”

Nothing about racism and the urge to control, how weird.

Almost like they’re encouraging mixing whatever the cost.

“In general, younger age of first marriage, age and educational differences among the spouses (particularly when the husband is more than two years younger or less educated than the wife); lower levels of education (less than college); lower income; and having no or fewer young children were significantly associated with marital instability.”

So lower quality individuals choose to mix.
Groundbreaking.
Stupidity, poverty, atheist fertility predict their divorce (and decision to have wed in the first place).

“Interracial couples tend to have higher incomes and older ages at marriage (both of which are associated with lower rates of dissolution), so these characteristics cannot explain their higher levels of divorce or separation.”

I smell bullshit.
If they wed, bed and divorce like idiots…
could they be idiots? Why u no publish IQ data?

“Although, mixed marriages are also more likely to involve larger differences in age and education between spouses (consistent with the first homogamy hypothesis), which could partially explain their higher risks of marital dissolution.”

There we go.
Backpedal central.

Almost like marrying a virtual child (age gap) is unpleasant, too.

“Unexpectedly, however, the addition of controls for nativity/citizenship status did not alter the hazard ratio associated with interracial marriage.”

Huh.

“Thus far, the results support the first homogamy hypothesis, though the support was rather weak.”

Despite your best efforts to obscure it? Sure Zhang.

Interracial marriage was positively associated with marital dissolution net of couple characteristics, but this relationship was only marginally significant (p < .10).”

Still science.

“We presented the hazard ratios for race/ethnicity only, although the full models are available to interested readers upon request.”

What cover-up?

For a laugh:


All four hazard models.

“Nevertheless, the results were consistent with the second homogamy hypothesis in that the risk of marital dissolution was highest among Black-White couples, followed by Hispanic-White, minority-minority couples, and finally, Asian-White couples.”

Kek.

“Among Asians, the hazard of divorce or separation for interracial couples fell between that of Asian and White endogamous couples but the difference from White couples was not significant, thus failing to fully support Hypothesis 4. We had also hypothesized that nativity and citizenship between spouses of Hispanic and Asian interracial couples may help explain their higher risks of marital dissolution (Hypothesis 5). This idea was not fully supported because interracial marriages involving Hispanics or Asians did not experience elevated hazards of dissolution (so there were no significant differences to explain). Nevertheless, nativity and citizenship did help explain the relatively low risks of instability among Hispanic and Asian endogamous couples. When we added controls for nativity and citizenship in Model 4, the hazards for Hispanic and Asian endogamous couples increased, thereby narrowing the difference from both White couples and interracial couples. In fact, the difference between Hispanic-White and Hispanic-Hispanic couples became insignificant after controlling for citizenship and nativity in Model 4”

In short, when Trump lets the waifus out and relieves them of their fraudulent green cards, expect a lot of divorce.
MAGA.

Then again… there are other kinks to iron out.

“Among Hispanic-White couples, Hispanic husband-White wife were no more likely to dissolve than White or Hispanic endogamous couples.”

You see why religion must be controlled for.

“The contribution of this study is that it examines the instability of interracial marriage among Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians in contemporary American society, an era marked by increasing diversity and increasing prevalence of interracial marriage. Overall, although marital dissolution was found to be strongly associated with race/ethnicity, the results failed to provide evidence that interracial marriage per se is associated with an elevated risk of marital dissolution. “

No, you failed to provide evidence. You.
Shit methodology, son.

Our results do show that, on the whole, interracial marriages are less stable than endogamous marriages, even after controlling for couple characteristics.”

Uhuh.

“When we divided the results by race/ethnicity, the results were only partially consistent with the homogamy perspective.”

Despite your best efforts to minimize, consistent.
They should also study second-generation race-mixing, since the mixed tend only to reproduce with one another.

“Rather, the most consistent result was that the risks of divorce for interracial couples for all combinations (Black-White, Hispanic-White, and Asian-White) were not significantly different from those of the higher-risk origin group.”

That’s still divorce. More divorce. Quit trying to spin it.

“Even after pooling six SIPP panels together, the number of interracial couples was small, which may have contributed to the insignificant findings.”

True.

They are very abnormal, Hollywood lies.

“In our study, the effects of certain racial/ethnic combinations were similar for both men and women once controls were introduced into the models (e.g., among Asians and Hispanics).”

Appealing to “alpha” won’t work on this one.

Now for another paper I’m sure cannot be biased by one “Choi”…

Race mixing and re-marriage.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5300087/

Plot twist: The modern mudshark is a statistically divorced man remarrying Asian.

I wonder why they never mention this.

“The two most frequently crossed boundaries – those involving White-Asian and White-Hispanic couples – are more permeable in remarriages than in first marriages. Boundaries that are crossed with less frequency – those between minority groups and the White-Black boundary-are less permeable in remarriages than in first marriages. Collectively, these findings suggest that racial and ethnic sorting processes in remarriage may reify existing social distances between pan-ethnic groups. Racial and ethnic variations in how the relative permeability of boundary changes between first and higher-order marriages underscore the importance of considering a broad array of interracial pairings when assessing the ways in which changes in family structure and marital sorting behavior promote integration.”

Promote integration…

From the male (decision) side:

So white men are the race traitors.
Interesting.

White genocide, blame Yellow Fever.

Statistically.

“Tabular results also reveal that for Hispanic and Asian women, intermarriage rates are higher in remarriages than in first marriages. One-third of Asian women wed non-Asian men in their first marriage, but over half did so in remarriage”

Because they couldn’t get a white woman (again).

Hit that Wall hard, huh? Study adiposity, come on.

And it’s obvious white fever in the Asian’s case, a third!

It isn’t the race-mixing white women.
“Eight percent of White women cross ethno-racial boundaries in first marriage, as compared with 6 percent of White women who remarry.”
They seem to learn their lesson.

Table 4 shows the college brainwashing.
They definitely won’t spy on you.
“better-educated women are more likely than their educationally disadvantaged counterparts to cross racial and ethnic boundaries in marriage”
The women are brainwashed too. But it’s also seeking IQ parity, upper-class women typically went to college to find husbands, so more studies are needed and more white men allowed in the Western universities that are their birthright.

“It is conceivable that White-Hispanic and White-Asian marriages likely become even more common in remarriage when third party controls weaken following the dissolution of a first union

They ignore their family’s wishes, bad sons should be disinherited.

and previously married individuals face experience limited availability of co-ethnic potential partners (Kalmijn, 1998; Schwartz, 2013).”

LOL

Can’t get a white woman!

Right there! Ouch.

“Other scholarship claims that cultural dissimilarities between spouses increase marital conflict and instability by reducing the basis for spousal consensus and mutual understanding between spouses (Hohmann-Marriott and Amato, 2008; Kalmijn, 1998; Schwartz, 2013; Zhang and Van Hook, 2009).

resentment

Presumably, couples that exit minority-only interracial marriages avoid similar unions in remarriage, preferring instead to form remarry endogamously, to wed a White partner the next time around, or forego marriage entirely.”

Using white people, again. So the white people are also getting dregs in the arrangement.
It’s like the marital equivalent of busing kids in to improve test scores.

“Descriptive tabulations show that one-in-three women who remarried wed never-married husbands, but only one-in-ten first time brides wed previously married men.”

Yeah if he failed as a husband once, why bet on a lame horse?
He didn’t keep his vows the first time. What a catch! (Throw it back!)

“These analyses, which indicate whether in couples’ mixed marital experiences biased the estimates of boundary crossing in first and subsequent marriages, reaffirm the reported results.”

So in many mixed re-marriages, the previously married party is the dregs of their group.

“base the analyses on recent unions” K.

“Partly this resulted because many large government surveys, such as the decennial census, stopped collecting information about marital order.”

Because it makes men look bad.

“In the context of rising intermarriage and remarriage rates, our study underscores the importance of disaggregating marriage order to clarify whether, in what ways, and for which groups changes in coupling behavior promote integration. Collecting data that permits these distinctions is necessary to avoid conflating potentially divergent intermarriage trends in first and higher order unions, some of which are driven by racial and ethnic differences in divorce rates.”

Oh, they know.
Most starter marriages are male-led affairs, they think (wrongly, QED) they can always trade up later (not to be entered into lightly….) and abandoning wife #1 has no social consequences.
So re-marrying men are largely to blame for the huge divorce rates. Good to know.

This explains why they rarely make it male-led data.

“This pattern, which is consistent with past findings, suggests that low barriers to social interaction across racial and ethnic groups when coupled with suboptimal marriage market conditions and weakened third party control can facilitate interracial remarriages for these groups (Aguirre et al., 1995; Fu, 2010; Kalmijn, 1998; Schwartz, 2013).”

Random re-marriage should be illegal, it’s like flunking a driving test but serious. A society that lets adults (who should be mature enough to commit) re-marry capriciously like infinite respawns is condemning the culture, religion, spouses and children to the misery of an insecure life. What a betrayal.

They bitch about masculinity, when comes the manning-up? Men were respected when they stuck out their duties. Don’t take it on if you don’t mean it.

“Prior studies suggest that cultural dissimilarities between partners diminish grounds for spousal consensus, leading to conflictive, unstable marriages at high risk of dissolution (Hohmann-Marriott and Amato, 2008). In remarriage, previously married men and women from mixed-race unions may revise their mate criteria to avoid similar forms of partner incompatibility (Dean and Gurak, 1978).”

Except stupid white guys with yellow fever.
I wonder if they’re more likely porn addicts. That would be an entertaining study.

“Stated differently, intermarriage studies restricted to White-Black couples render an incomplete portrayal of mate selection behavior in the context of an ever more diverse society.”

They may not be getting married but they’re having more children than the white guys with Yellow Fever. It’s typical atheist sub-fertility so given the standard, limited dating patterns their grand-kids will be a quarter black.

“In similar fashion, although prior work shows that characteristics of spouses interact in shaping mate selection behavior (Fu, 2010), our data do not permit consideration of the joint distribution of spouses’ characteristics. We report analyses based on intermarriage patterns pegged to wives’ characteristics; however, auxiliary analyses based on husbands’ attributes yielded similar conclusions.”

Since the male proposes, it should be male-led data.
Look for r-selection traits and that’ll resolve most of it.

“How the mate selection behavior of widowed and divorced individuals is largely uncharted and certainly warrants investigation.”

Women are more likely to be widowed, men divorced, that’s why they don’t look for it – it makes the men look heartless.

“marriage confers legal rights and obligations, many of which are not extended to cohabiting couples (child support is a notable exception)”

It shouldn’t be, don’t have kids with someone you haven’t married first, or at least don’t expect the authority of a husband over a woman you didn’t yoke yourself to. If a man wants “his” kids so much, he should be taking primary care of them – not fobbing them off on a foreign nanny like some high-powered executive (daycare is abusive). The low IQ nanny normalization may be responsible for divorced children’s lower IQs.

“Specifically, racial and ethnic profile of former cohabiting partners are seldom recorded in US data suitable for analyzing inter-racial coupling behavior (e.g., ACS, Census, NSFG).”

coincidence

“The exclusion of interracial cohabitation will understate the extent to which couples cross ethnic and racial boundaries in forming co-residential interracial unions given that interracial unions are more likely than same-race unions to start and remain as a cohabitation (Kreider, 2000; Rodriguez-Garcia, 2015).”

Study separation.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315595/

The variable nobody wants to discuss.

“Despite the growing number of interethnic marriages in the U.S., few studies have examined intimate partner violence (IPV) in interethnic couples. This article examined past-year occurrences of IPV across interethnic and intra-ethnic couples and tested correlates of IPV specifically in interethnic couples. Data were from a national survey of couples 18 years of age and older from the 48 contiguous states. Interethnic couples (n = 116) included partners from different ethnic backgrounds, including black-white, Hispanic-white, and black-Hispanic couples. White (n = 555), black (n = 358), and Hispanic (n = 527) intra-ethnic couples included partners with the same ethnicity. Data analyses were prevalence rates and logistic regressions. The analyses showed that interethnic couples were comparatively younger and had shorter relationships than intra-ethnic white, black, and Hispanic couples.

Male partners in interethnic couples had higher rates of binge drinking and alcohol problems compared to male partners in intra-ethnic couples.

So much for happy mixing. Stock photos lied to me?

Still no mention of racism, so a white male hitting a non-white is okay if you’re married to them? Surely it’s more racist to treat them like breeding sows and sexual concubines.

Past year prevalence rates for any occurrence of IPV and acts of severe IPV were higher for interethnic couples relative to intra-ethnic couples.

Why isn’t this mentioned in Sex Ed?

Most occurrences of IPV for interethnic couples were mutual.

Obedient waifu trope is a myth.

Factors predicting IPV among interethnic couples included marital status, couples’ age, male alcohol problems, and female impulsivity.

Mounting evidence points to interethnic couples as a high risk group for IPV.

Why aren’t there PSAs?

Interethnic couples may be at greater risk for IPV because of their younger age, binge drinking and alcohol problems.

You can’t blame the drink. They drink to have an excuse.

Future research could build on this study by examining cohort effects and regional differences in IPV for interethnic couples, and the risk for IPV across interethnic couples of different ethnic compositions.”

Note: no (non-Hispanic) Asian-White data in this one tested. Hmm.

However, found this:

“Fusco (2010) used county police reports to examine interethnic and intra-ethnic couple differences in IPV for a more diverse community sample of whites, blacks, Asians, and Hispanics. Interethnic couples were more likely than intra-ethnic minority and white couples to have a prior history of IPV and to experience mutual IPV in which both partners were determined by police to be equally involved in perpetrating violence.

No world for submissive waifu.

I guess that’s what happens when you marry someone with higher T than yourself (those manjaws).

White women don’t look like such bitches now, huh?

Victims of IPV in interethnic couples were also at greater risk of being injured during the violence when compared to intra-ethnic couples.

Wages of sin?

Logically, you wouldn’t hold back with the out-group. It’s unconscious.

Diversity + Proximity = Domestic violence, in this case.

This may suggest that interethnic couples engage in more severe acts of partner violence relative to intra-ethnic couples, although Fusco (2010) did not specifically examine partner violence severity.

Wonder why.

So the white guys really do hate their waifu, deep down.
And the Asian woman does hit back (unlike whites).
Why don’t the MRAs ever mention this? Their mutual violence trope is racial, not sexual!

“Couples that included Asian partners or partners from ‘other’ ethnicities (n = 43) were also excluded due to their small sample size in the dataset.”

convenient, considering

For example, white-Asian marriages make up a large percentage of interethnic marriages (Hattery, 2009), but we were not able to include them in this study due to the small number of Asians surveyed.”

I smell bullshit. So they abuse one another but they don’t talk. To save face.

Enough for now. I’ve proven my point.

What happens to teenage rape victims?

Another reason forced marriage in a society or “child brides” are barbaric.

Plus a side track on promiscuity, statist preventable disease enabling and STD gene evolution.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X04002575

“Results
The lifetime prevalence of forced sex for females and males was 10.2% and 5.1%, respectively.

I’m disgusted by that alone.

What a “revolution”.

Feed the entitlement of (serial*) rapists.

For the overall sample, feeling sad/hopeless(odds ratio [OR] 1.9), having considered (OR 2.1) or attempted (OR 1.4) suicide, being a victim of physical dating violence (OR 2.8) heavy cigarette use (OR 1.4), binge drinking (OR 0.7), having multiple recent sexual partners (OR 8.3) and unprotected sex (OR 1.7) were correlated with a history of forced sex. Among females, associations were found among sad/hopeless feelings (OR 1.6), having considered suicide(OR 2.2), fighting (OR 1.3), physical dating violence (OR 2.1) heavy cigarette use (OR 1.8), multiple sexual partners (OR 9.3) , alcohol/or drug use before sex (OR 1.6) and unprotected sex (OR 1.5). Among males, associations were found among sad/hopeless feelings (OR 1.8), attempted suicide (OR 1.9), gun carrying (OR 1.8), physical dating violence (OR 4.3), multiple sexual partners (OR 7.8), unprotected sex (OR 1.9), and other ethnicity (OR 3.3).

Conclusions
Although a history of forced sexual intercourse affects a small number of adolescents,

10% of girls isn’t small….

1 in 20 boys neither?

it is an important public health issue. The psychological and behavioral correlates of forced sexuality

Flashback to all the statist propaganda of Sex Ed.

If we adults can’t be trusted with guns or sugary drinks because they enable bad behaviour, what about practically Tantric marital sex guides given to single, horny teenagers, along with condoms and pills?

Is that not encouraging anti-social behaviour?

The emphasis on “safe” sex is denying the legitimacy of celibacy. It assumes everyone is a slut. They can get that information online anyway. Innocence is illegal because explicit, brain-altering pornography is freely available (no credit card wall to safeguard from child access).
A single person shouldn’t be sleeping around, the touted health benefits of sex are statistically non-existent (compared to real exercise, comparing anything to a couch potato would be a benefit, that’s just bad science) and psychologically they’d be better off handling matters themselves if physically desperate than endangering everything from their marriage prospects to their mental health to their future cancer death risk.

Then there’s the rape allegation from sexual coercion, which is legally valid. How many teenagers are taught that instead of an ugly form of physical entitlement a la Brave New World?

Sex is the adult marker. Yes, it is serious and should be taken deadly seriously. The fallout of a sex life can get you killed (crime of passion is a legal defence in France).
Parents shouldn’t allow sexually active children to live with them anymore. It’s abnormal and contributes to this culture of infantile adults, with all the endorphin-producers and none of the struggle to get them. They regress and functionally retard themselves because those rewards signal the brain that it needn’t develop further, having earned the reproduction status in the tribe (and virgin genuises like Newton never really stopped growing intellectually, along with other comparable groups like monks). Children with early sexuality never catch up mentally either, for this reason. The window of opportunity is lost, it’s like trying to feed plant nutrients into a fruit that’s already been plucked. Future generations will look back in horror that we force-feed ducks to make liver paste but how much more that we encourage the most depraved degeneracy in the most vulnerable – children, which stunts their life, by outcomes? And an addiction, as freeing them?
If you’re mature enough to make babies (that’s what it is) then you have no right to intrude on your own parents. Traditional societies held this rite of passage important. Men who brag about losing their virginity aren’t taught to value purity of the body and psychological pair bonds, they’re kept ignorant of these (by vindictive sluts who want to convert others to misery) and consider themselves men for performing like prostitutes (white men, how far ye have fallen) for a near-stranger who doesn’t love them enough to give them children for it (the test of female loyalty is the investment of fertility). It’s empty. They think they’re proving how they’re independent but they still exist on their parent’s health insurance or under their father’s roof, it’s objectively pathetic. I’m surprised the Boomers didn’t give them a trophy. The Manwhore Medal.
Congratulations, you’ll make an inferior husband with every notch! – Just like the divorcing Boomers.
It is not “fun”, not sport, not exercise, not “good for you”, there is no upside to promiscuity. Scientifically, legally, it’s a con. It’s a self-numbing, self-soothing habit (which unlike masturbation, promotes disease**) that makes strangers have trouble connecting or ruin their pair bonding for the eventual marriage they, again, feel entitled to.

But won’t actually get (quality or bust).

Where did all the good women go? You made them notches. The rest of the world is laughing at America bitching about the consequence of their own causes. You want a culture of sluts, now you have shit marriages. You made your bed. America was the Patient Zero of how to fuck up an amazing civilization with degeneracy in modernity (and yes while planned you went along with it for gibs). You’ve done everything wrong but refuse to reverse it, whining that The Government should “fix it” with further incursions on responsible people’s freedoms when it’s individualism that caused it and…aren’t these guys libertarians? Highlights include bitching about abortion but wanting to keep it legal in cases of premarital consenting sex and bitching about disease rates but refusing to use condoms like a grown-up.

Are you men or not? Either you’re held responsible for your actions or not.

A basic fact that’s been known for ages:

Anyone terrified by being a parent isn’t mature enough to be having sex. If the thought of being a mother or father disgusts you, you shouldn’t be using those parts like Lego bricks (the ones that don’t un-stick) because you can’t un-make a baby.

How often does it mention that? At least, not to do anything downstairs with the opposite sex because… babies happen. They can’t act shocked when the process of baby-making produces one. That is normal.

How much of an idiot do you have to be, to deposit living sperm into or close to (anal) a vagina, and be surprised when a baby comes out nine months later? If you never want kids and you don’t get the snip first, age 18, you deserve to be laughed at. Women can’t get done age 18 but men can get it easily. It’s like something out of Idiocracy to act like your fertility is a surprise, that was a main joke at the opening of the film. You can show them all the pictures but they assume their lust can temporarily suspend the laws of biology. And they treat pregnancy as a disease, like the late-term abortion monsters. (You consented to make it, that’s all sex is, sex is not an orgasm, nobody is stopping you from having those, it even happens in sleep for both sexes. I would add that the cultural focus on orgasms is intended to weaken bonds with pressure and tire people though, it isn’t the purpose and shouldn’t be a focus if you care about health.)

Expecting infertility is abnormal. Really creepy, if you think about it.
A union of death.

Sex Ed doesn’t educate at all, it misinforms.

suggest that these youth have been harmed

really?

the overt pedos saying about raping menstruating little girls are abusive?

wow, shook

and may further place themselves in harm’s way.

Self-destruction, common reaction to abuse.

People are not sex toys or ego pacifiers, whatever Sex Ed has “taught” you.

Intimacy means a lot to people who aren’t psychologically broken. It’s serious. Only a psychopath sees people as toys.

Furthermore, the profiles of adolescent females and males who report such experiences are distinct in ways that warrant their independent examination and attention.”

Different biology, different trauma. Female virginity is more complex of course, involving fertility as the carrier sex and there’s the high risk of physical permanent damage including scarring. Given that fact, the female is historically considered worse (protect the baby-carrying sex is a survival instinct, female fertility or available brides are a vital resource of a race) but men and boys merit individual study as a sex that tries to reduce their numbers (abused) and improve their life outcomes too, while acknowledging sex differences without shame. A cultural change is needed there.

No sex without (full) consent, as this shows, that’s just rape.
It ruins lives.
Strangely, it also increases race-mixing. Stress dampens the typical aversion? Or it seems riskier? This would apply to any racial dynamics, remember, so a black girl would become more likely to sleep with a Mexican, for example.

This is a major factor in suicide, unspoken.

Slutty men and women are far more likely to be acting out their abuse in a way they feel they control.

https://psychologydictionary.org/repetition-compulsion/

It is informally known as “acting out” but instead of relieving themselves of the pain, it’s a temporary purge that brings on feelings of shame and isolation, which they’re often told means they must sleep around more. By the Sex Ed groomers.

Sex is not a suitable anti-depressant. If you must, just masturbate (needing porn is a form of impotence). There’s higher esteem and satisfaction where studied anyway, don’t expect the groomers to tell you that (otherwise how could they rape their students?) … they want to convert people to their miserable lifestyle.

Emotional distance is not normal in men, nor stoicism (philosophical stoics are very close to people) but it’s a fear of emotional intimacy, especially with the demographic of their attacker/s.

*Their libido doesn’t disappear after one attack.

**The MRAs going on about male cancer studies don’t want to research how bad the habit of promiscuity is for the health of a male body because they might have their feelings hurt. They might be judged or questioned (death before triggering?)… There’s a link between anal “sex” and various cancers, for example. Fuck like a gay man, get the same disease risk profile of one. They hardly research it (fine, die?) but penile cancers etc all rise because of fecal bacteria (you know they refuse condoms, just like a homo).

And they’re the reason syphilis is back (men are the major carrier). Hope you like your dick dropping off because you’re too manly to protect it (valid Q: who would know you use condoms unless you tell them and have you seen how many male porn stars get HIV?). Antibiotics are failing on various STDs because the Government gives them all the antibiotics they want without telling them to be less of a slut in future and, being stupid, they use them wrong – directly causing resistance. 

The State shouldn’t hand them out again because hey, you can’t be trusted to use them properly and take measures to avoid infection, so eventually they will fail because of your behaviour.

Another cause of resistance is that they often have multiple STDs (and don’t tell the other party beforehand, which is rape), that swap genes. Still the State refuses to quit enabling the walking public disease cases. The rest of us suffer.

The STDs are preferentially evolving within the male system because nobody is telling the manwhores to stop. The rest of us don’t want to die on the operating table for a large garden splinter age 44.

They grow where irresponsibility lives.

Proof:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180627160523.htm
“The analysis revealed that 9 percent of gonococcal genes showed increased expression exclusively in men and included genes involved in host immune cell interactions.”
The female expression was half that. Tell the manwhores to stop (and the slutty women obviously) or the drugs will become smothered and ineffective in the human immune system (i.e. of all of us).

The “I’m not harming anyone” libertarian argument is bullshit! We have genome data!

It’s evolving around your stupidity. To kill the species.

(By infertility or direct mortality does not matter).

Statistically?

America doesn’t need a baby boom either, you need the contraction that’s happening because few of you can get married, can afford children and raise them properly plus the Baby Boomer generation was a fluke of history (and world war dead), repeating it will constrict your society and cause more Boom problems. More people, less prosperity (see India). Picture overflowing sewers. You need to be K-selected and focus on quality while reducing foreign (genetic) competition for your domestic tax base resources (your birthright). You cannot out-breed the billions of Asia and Africa and South America. America is a small country compared to most of the globe. Thankfully, you don’t have to.

And immigration doesn’t actually help, Magic Dirt doesn’t fix their tendency to over-breed.

The guys going on about the Spartans can’t sit out in the cold overnight once but never talk about the boy rape by “mentors” (it was Ancient Greece), not being able to choose who you marry (class was important) or being forbidden from living with your own wife until age 30 so… we’ll pass on that system. While making men full citizens age 30 is a good idea neurologically, for voting especially, the sexual stuff is creepy. Plus, you’d 100% be drafted. Sparta was a military force, you can’t be a Spartan male in lifestyle and not be drafted. Usually these same guys getting misty-eyed about Brotherhood (military cult dogma) also bitch about the idea they might be drafted as “sexist” – yes, but in a good way. Men evolved to fight. Men are better equipped to defend themselves. Women are needed so the nation doesn’t die biologically (whatever the outcome) and many women don’t reproduce either (social reasons) but men always fought one another as a rite of passage for a wife and few ancient men bred, your odds are better nowadays. Why complain you have an advantage (self-defense) and the state knows about it? Would you rather be a woman, and physically weaker? Are you sure?

(Physically weaker and more likely to be sexually attacked, 10% lifetime rape risk up top, great combo – there’s your ‘hate crime’).

update:

I didn’t know this existed already until I looked but fuck you America.

http://advocatesaz.org/2012/11/20/std-awareness-antibiotic-resistant-syphilis/

HOW DO YOU KEEP GETTING WORSE. HOW.

“and when the disease goes untreated, it can cause severe, possibly fatal, damage to the nervous system.”

Slutty preppers die first.

Why did no-fault divorce actually happen?

https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/5145-mnookin-and-kornhauser—1979—bargaining-in-the

Ironically, to enforce the Bible, in places.
Specifically the places where it wasn’t working. [1]

“Divorce was granted
only after an official inquiry by a judge, who had to determine
whether “appropriate grounds”-very narrowly defined in terms of
marital offenses-existed.6 When a divorce was granted, the state asserted
broad authority to structure the economic relationship of the
spouses and to maintain regulatory jurisdiction over the children
and their relationship to the parents.7 Doctrines such as collusion,8
connivance,9 and condonation’0 were meant to curtail the degree to
which parties themselves could bring about a divorce through agreement;
the procedural requirements reflected the view that everyone
was “a suspicious character.”

Among other things, no-fault divorce is also responsible for a lower spousal suicide rate, probably homicide (harder to measure) and certainly lower rates of domestic abuse. Overturning it requires an open admission these things do happen, one or both parties can be absolutely awful at their job and they still maintain the right to decide their intimate business over whatever State they happen to be stuck in. Appealing to tradition doesn’t really work when some of those values were very poorly aligned with the law at the time, to keep up Pollyanna appearances. To go back to all the old laws, men would have to prove good character (what is that? nobody would get married) and women would be able to press charges for seduction (rape by fraud is already historically present in the law books, i.e. nobody would get married). A lot of the modern “dating” process would also be swiftly made illegal.

Funny they never mention that.

And if men were the sex wriggling to get away, it begs two questions. Firstly, why the fuck did they propose? Second, wouldn’t that constitute abandonment on his part? A grave matter, severely punished, we all know of deadbeats who’d be whipped into shape by a return of fault laws. No-fault divorce treats men equally to women (justice is blind ‘n all), because they’re given the benefit of the doubt where they could be abandoned too.

A list of unisex faults and standards of proof are required, rooted in the post-Reformation Bible, instead of a reversion to a system that blatantly did not work. Two ruined lives plus children is not a success. For example, allowing divorce but banning re-marriage would silence many vocal oppositions. If there’s a limit on abortion and insurance claims, there should logically be one on an oath including “til death do you part”. These faults should be acknowledged in the marriage contract itself, along with ways to avoid them, and an expanded edition to make sure both parties really intend to follow through on their oath (which should be set in stone for legal reasons).

1 https://www.compellingtruth.org/grounds-for-divorce.html

“In the Old Testament, God allowed divorce if a man’s heart became so hardened against his wife that she was actually better off without him

…That isn’t rare. Calculate the odds of marrying anyone with mental problems nowadays. Any mental problem.

Unhappy wives used to hire men to fake affairs and “accidentally” get caught until the 30s when the only common American grounds for divorce was adultery. Your system needs work. Increase your marriage age to 18 for starters, you monsters. Child brides are both a Muslim and an American thing.

If you have a problem with keeping the age of consent at the age of adulthood…. what about voting?

Some simple changes and why:

  1. a hard limit on the number of times anyone can marry excepting widowhood.
  2. a grievance period for widows where marriage is not allowed, depending on how long they were married.
  3. if someone’s sexuality changes, they’re considered to have defrauded the other party of their agreed companionship.
  4. long engagements only, 6-12 months?
  5. one party letting themselves go completely is taken as a clinical indicator (already is) of passive-aggression or depression
  6. no addicts, taking up any addiction is grounds for no-fault divorce on behalf of the other party due to the brain damage effectively killing the person they married and rely upon
  7. marriage is not considered a license to any form of abuse, higher conduct is expected compared to strangers
  8. abandonment includes social, you agreed to be there for one another not at the club/bar/party
  9. romance must go both ways
  10. if someone turns out to be a psychopath (the only condition that can fake it until the wedding), divorce is allowed and the proven psychopath’s influence over the other party limited to account for their condition (ideally you test before marriage?)
  11. 18+, I hope this one is obvious.
  12. if one party works from home it is counted as work for the marriage
  13. real Christians only, married in a Christian ceremony
  14. complaining about their marriage online illegal (other people’s marital status or marriages too) – privacy law
  15. no atheists (think of the divorce risk), they don’t need a “piece of paper”, remember?
  16. adulterers can be sued again, but per act and depravity – would branding be too far?
  17. all bastard children from adultery aborted (risky but I’ll put it, it spares the legitimate children their rights)
  18. no adulterous unions could wed (because obviously they can’t be trusted with it)
  19. a cap on how much weddings can actually cost because... Jesus….
  20. earnings prior to marriage not counted in divorce proceedings, including inheritance, which skips over the spouse to the children.

I flatter myself these are common sense.