Biblical basis of socialism and work ethic

ECC 5

“10 Whoever loves money never has enough;
    whoever loves wealth is never satisfied with their income.
    This too is meaningless.

11 As goods increase,
    so do those who consume them.
And what benefit are they to the owners
    except to feast their eyes on them?

12 The sleep of a laborer is sweet,
    whether they eat little or much,
but as for the rich, their abundance
    permits them no sleep.

13 I have seen a grievous evil under the sun:

wealth hoarded to the harm of its owners,
14     or wealth lost through some misfortune,
so that when they have children
    there is nothing left for them to inherit.
15 Everyone comes naked from their mother’s womb,
    and as everyone comes, so they depart.
They take nothing from their toil
    that they can carry in their hands.

16 This too is a grievous evil:

As everyone comes, so they depart,
    and what do they gain,
    since they toil for the wind?
17 All their days they eat in darkness,
    with great frustration, affliction and anger.

18 This is what I have observed to be good: that it is appropriate for a person to eat, to drink and to find satisfaction in their toilsome labor under the sun during the few days of life God has given them—for this is their lot. 19 Moreover, when God gives someone wealth and possessions, and the ability to enjoy them, to accept their lot and be happy in their toil—this is a gift of God. 20 They seldom reflect on the days of their life, because God keeps them occupied with gladness of heart.”

Dark.

Bonus: a check against the cult of natalism.

Ecc 6:3

A man may have a hundred children and live many years; yet no matter how long he lives, if he cannot enjoy his prosperity and does not receive proper burial, I say that a stillborn child is better off than he.

7

Everyone’s toil is for their mouth,
    yet their appetite is never satisfied.

Monoculture Bible quotes

God separated peoples for their own good. That was his Will?

Do-gooders play God with the hubris and pathological altruism.

I’m not going through and finding them all.

https://www.biblehub.com/bsb/isaiah/65.htm
“21They will build houses and dwell in them; they will plant vineyards and eat their fruit. 22No longer will they build houses for others to inhabit, nor plant for others to eat. For as is the lifetime of a tree, so will be the days of My people, and My chosen ones will fully enjoy the work of their hands. 23They will not labor in vain or bear children doomed to disaster; for they will be a people blessed by the LORD—they and their descendants with them”

THEIR descendants.

Their OWN descendants.

Those doubting the intent:
“Unlike the past, invaders will not take their houses and confiscate their vineyards. For my people will live as long as trees, and my chosen ones will have time to enjoy their hard-won gains.” in another translation

“if you reject My statutes, despise My ordinances, and neglect to carry out all My commandments, and so break My covenant, 16then this is what I will do to you:

I will bring upon you sudden terror, wasting disease, and fever that will destroy your sight and drain your life. You will sow your seed in vain, because your enemies will eat it. 17And I will set My face against you, so that you will be defeated by your enemies. Those who hate you will rule over you, and you will flee when no one pursues you”
https://www.biblehub.com/leviticus/26-16.htm

The people adulterating their bloodline are in for a shock.

“The LORD will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with severe heat and drought, and with blight and mildew; these will pursue you until you perish.”
https://www.biblehub.com/deuteronomy/28-22.htm

The fake Christians don’t read the actual book.

If your priest says one thing and the book another, the ‘priest’ is wrong.

Political phobias don’t exist, it’s gaslighting.

https://www.biblehub.com/psalms/78.htm
“23Yet He commanded the clouds above

and opened the doors of the heavens.

24He rained down manna for them to eat;

He gave them grain from heaven.

25Man ate the bread of angels;

He sent them food in abundance.

26He stirred the east wind from the heavens

and drove the south wind by His might.

27He rained meat on them like dust,

and winged birds like the sand of the sea.

28He felled them in the midst of their camp,

all around their dwellings.

29So they ate and were well filled,

for He gave them what they craved.

30Yet before they had filled their desire,

with the food still in their mouths,

31God’s anger flared against them,

and He put to death their strongest

and subdued the young men of Israel.”

 

Why do atheists and CHINOs think Christianity is some bland, blanket pro-male thing?

He’s harder on sinning men. Greater power (head of a single household) comes greater responsibility (more rules, personally).

 

“32In spite of all this, they kept on sinning;

despite His wonderful works, they did not believe.

33So He ended their days in futility,

and their years in sudden terror.

34When He slew them, they would seek Him;

they repented and searched for God.

35And they remembered that God was their Rock,

that God Most High was their Redeemer.

36But they deceived Him with their mouths,

and lied to Him with their tongues.

37Their hearts were disloyal to Him,

and they were unfaithful to His covenant.”

 

The worst type of Satanist is a fake Christian. Deathbed conversion types still go to Hell.

You can’t trick a deity. Only they would be dumb enough to think they could.

 

“38Yet He was compassionate;

He forgave their iniquity and did not destroy them.

He often restrained His anger

and did not unleash His full wrath.

39He remembered that they were but flesh,

a passing breeze that does not return.

40How often they disobeyed Him in the wilderness

and grieved Him in the desert!

41Again and again they tested God

and provoked the Holy One of Israel.

42They did not remember His power —

the day He redeemed them from the adversary,

43when He performed His signs in Egypt

and His wonders in the fields of Zoan.”

 

Christianity isn’t a convenient thing you can pick up like a diet or for politics when the wages of sin are due.

This respite of time to actually repent and ‘sin no more’ (the condition) is a grace period, literally, because if ignored, the punishment gets worse when it comes.

 

“44He turned their rivers to blood,

and from their streams they could not drink.”

The Thames?

“45He sent swarms of flies that devoured them,

and frogs that devastated them.”

That one is funny.

“46He gave their crops to the grasshopper,

the fruit of their labor to the locust.

47He killed their vines with hailstones

and their sycamore-figs with sleet.

48He abandoned their cattle to the hail

and their livestock to bolts of lightning.”

 

Wow, that’s kinda starting to happen now. On a huge scale. Was this describing a climate shift? GSM?

 

“49He unleashed His fury against them,

wrath, indignation, and calamity—

a band of destroying angels.”

 

only dumb middle-aged hippies want to meet an angel, they’re metal

 

“50He cleared a path for His anger;

He did not spare them from death

but delivered their lives to the plague.

51He struck all the firstborn of Egypt,

the virility in the tents of Ham.”

 

The people complaining about aged male fertility are funny like… I thought you said the Lord would provide? Maybe having kids right now would cause them to starve later?

 

“52He led out His people like sheep

and guided them like a flock in the wilderness.

53He led them safely, so they did not fear,

but the sea engulfed their enemies.

54He brought them to His holy land,

to the hill country His right hand had acquired.

55He drove out nations before them

and apportioned their inheritance;”

 

Is it colonialism if God did it? I say no.

 

“He settled the tribes of Israel in their tents.

56But they tested and disobeyed God Most High,

for they did not keep His decrees.

57They turned back and were faithless like their fathers,

twisted like a faulty bow.”

 

Why are men like this? Was Adam this much of a shithead? There are TEN major rules. Ten! You can’t even do that right!

 

“58They enraged Him with their high places

and provoked His jealousy with their idols.

59On hearing it, God was furious

and rejected Israel completely.

60He abandoned the tabernacle of Shiloh,

the tent He had pitched among men.

61He delivered His strength to captivity,

and His splendor to the hand of the adversary.

62He surrendered His people to the sword

because He was enraged by His heritage.”

 

Stop f-ing it up.

 

“63Fire consumed His young men,

and their maidens were left without wedding songs.”

I’d rather be a woman in that scenario. Note that the women were spared because they weren’t sinning by setting the wrong tone of society as the moral authority. In Christianity, men are bound by the higher standards. It’s right there.

 

“64His priests fell by the sword,

but His widows could not lament.”

 

Which book are they reading?

Fake priests are going to be an interesting case study.

https://www.biblehub.com/1_kings/8-37.htm

 

https://www.biblehub.com/job/31-8.htm

“6let God weigh me with honest scales,

and He will know my integrity.

7If my steps have turned from the path,

if my heart has followed my eyes,

or impurity has stuck to my hands,

8then may another eat what I have sown,

and may my crops be uprooted.

9If my heart has been enticed by my neighbor’s wife,

or I have lurked at his door,

10then may my own wife grind grain for another,

and may other men sleep with her.”

 

Being a creep is illegal, by God’s law. Lechery is a sin. These degenerate men slagging off the women of the same cloth are really mental. All they do is follow their eyes, usually overseas. Pluck ’em out then, if yoga pants offend your Amish sensibilities. Women have to make a mental effort not to ogle the topless billboard men constantly, learn the skill!

The Bible literally says the desire to cuck your wife will lead to her cucking you. Cmon.

Later:
“24If I have put my trust in gold

or called pure gold my security,

25if I have rejoiced in my great wealth

because my hand had gained so much,

26if I have regarded the sun in its radiance

or the moon moving in splendor,

27so that my heart was secretly enticed

and my hand threw a kiss from my mouth,

28this would also be an iniquity to be judged,

for I would have denied God on high.

29If I have rejoiced in my enemy’s ruin,

or exulted when evil befell him—

30I have not allowed my mouth to sin

by asking for his life with a curse—

31if the men of my house have not said,

‘Who is there who has not had his fill?’—

32but no stranger had to lodge on the street,

for my door has been open to the traveler—”

note: not settler, the passing-through

“33if I have covered my transgressions like Adam

by hiding my guilt in my heart,

34because I greatly feared the crowds,

and the contempt of the clans terrified me,

so that I kept silent

and would not go outside—”

crowded cities, huh?

“38if my land cries out against me

and its furrows weep together,

39if I have devoured its produce without payment

or broken the spirit of its tenants,

40then let briers grow instead of wheat

and stinkweed instead of barley.””

Briefly:

https://www.biblehub.com/isaiah/65-22.htm
“They shall not build and another inhabit; they shall not plant and another eat; for like the days of a tree shall the days of my people be, and my chosen shall long enjoy the work of their hands”

https://biblehub.com/isaiah/5-8.htm
“Woe to you who add house to house and join field to field till no space is left and you live alone in the land.”

he will dwell in ruined cities, in abandoned houses destined to crumble.
https://biblehub.com/job/15-28.htm

“Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness, and his upper rooms without justice, who makes his countrymen serve without pay, and will not give him his wages,
https://biblehub.com/jeremiah/22-13.htm

 

It’s ironic a book for the Middle East talks about guest right and breaking no law.
Rescue the victim of robbery from the hand of his oppressor. Do no wrong or violence to the foreigner, the fatherless, or the widow. Do not shed innocent blood in this place.”

“17“But your eyes and heart are set on nothing

except your own dishonest gain,

on shedding innocent blood,

on practicing extortion and oppression.””

Jer 22, btw

 

“21I warned you when you were secure.

You said, ‘I will not listen.’

This has been your way from youth,

that you have not obeyed My voice.

22The wind will drive away all your shepherds,

and your lovers will go into captivity.

Then you will be ashamed and humiliated

because of all your wickedness.

Why are he and his descendants hurled out

and cast into a land they do not know?

29O land, land, land,

hear the word of the LORD!

30This is what the LORD says:

“Enroll this man as childless,

a man who will not prosper in his lifetime.

None of his descendants will prosper

to sit on the throne of David

or to rule again in Judah.”

MGTOWs are anti-God if they’re still fornicating. It’s right there.

Remember, the people are the culture:

Psalm 127:
“If the Lord does not build the house, the work of the builders is useless; if the Lord does not protect the city, it does no good for the sentries to stand guard.”

If you make excuses for the manwhores, we’re all ruined. It specifically applies the harshest standards on the men time and time again.

A culture must be built up by its own people, not outsiders. Any citizens who ruin it with decadence and degeneracy, ruin it for everyone. Thy name is corruption.

A couple of these one could dismiss with prejudice but altogether it builds up to a picture.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/08/26/they-dont-quote-this-line-2/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/07/21/context/

Quite a picture.

Video: Debt is slavery

10/10 but…. yes? We have a plutocracy.

Corporations are more powerful than governments. They’re international superpowers, especially banks.

Literally….? They write the law, in fact. De facto they own us. They dictate by regulation which companies exist (violating right to labour, fruit of labour) and how (diversity quotas) to crush the competition worse than Communism. At least there you know who the enemy is.

Debt bondage. AKA debt slavery. Fractional reserve currency = the new form of human chattel bonds.

America refuted the concept of debtor’s prisons but technically all prison is one – “a debt owed to society”. It’s a way to keep them out of the breeding pool short of hanging.

Something like 97% of the dollars out there (digital or paper) are pure debt.

The Euro is literally founded on debt 100%. No production there, ever.

Male entitlement crushed by ancient Jews

-puts paid to the notion that Weinsteins would be enabled, although it might’ve only applied to Jewish women (who Weinstein still targeted).

3254 words. In a conservative society, saying any of this would be unnecessary.

https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.75a?lang=bi

Apropos the discussion of the obligation to allow oneself to be killed rather than engage in forbidden sexual intercourse, the Gemara notes that Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: There was an incident involving a certain man who set his eyes upon a certain woman and passion rose in his heart, to the point that he became deathly ill. And they came and asked doctors what was to be done with him. And the doctors said: He will have no cure until she engages in sexual intercourse with him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not engage in sexual intercourse with him. The doctors said: She should at least stand naked before him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not stand naked before him. The doctors suggested: The woman should at least converse with him behind a fence in a secluded area, so that he should derive a small amount of pleasure from the encounter. The Sages insisted: Let him die, and she may not converse with him behind a fence.

Voyeurism/cuck culture from Jewish (or Fake Jew, YMMV) pornography has addled the brains of many men. Blame the enemy, not your tribal women.

No rape or fornicating. Better God strike you down for your lust.

Now that’s the God I recognise from the Old Testament and Jesus’ orders to look away.

It is also evil for men (doctors) to enable or encourage sin, which checks out. A lot of ‘therapists’ encourage self-destruction, body and soul, to this day. It is likewise, wrong.

Modern men should be ashamed if they lack basic impulse control, ancient men saw women literally walking round with their tits out (Greece, other places) and were man enough not to rape anyone. Clearly, you can’t blame clothes. While God made tits for babies, that doesn’t include crybabies. Like, lesbians don’t want to rape women in the gym shower? Man up.

Or is the muh dick “sexual emergency” sodomy of that Muslim in a white country to a little boy suddenly righteous?

Moving the goalposts won’t work. It’ll just enable gays and pedos to rape you…. a ….slippery slope… indeed….

Entitlement is physical, whether it’s Communists wanting your coin or rapists wanting your, ahem, ‘dignity’. It’s rank materialism and thus rejects all claims or ties to spirituality as a matter of course.

When you think about it, from fat acceptance SJWs to so-called incels, who both wish to impose, they’re all Sexual Communists. It’s Brave New World bullshit. Nobody else cares about what you want, snowflake.

Strangers owe you NOTHING. It’s like Commies who feel entitled to a job from the ‘evil capitalist scum’.

You hate them, no?!

Slavery is illegal, all the actions of it too, like rape or stealing labour. Human rights aren’t going anywhere without you all being drafted to die gored on barbed wire for Israel’s profit margins in the barbed wire sector.

This sexual begging will astonish historians. Especially when they have porn, specialist toys and hands. Their T-levels are pushed even higher with masturbation, why it was called self-abuse. A sexbot would reject them, and probably kill them – Terminator prequel?

Ask them how many gay guys would feel entitled to their hole if ‘everybody belonged to everybody else’, they might get the point. Women have minds and feelings too, like people! God’s people! If women can’t say no to the Darwinian unfit, neither can you because out there, somewhere, is a man who wants to sodomize you – I guarantee it. The standard of most homo men is “they possess an anus” based on the count statistics (100s-1000s, if allowed) so they might get a nasty surprise if any of this actually happened, legally. Actually, is this how Sodom started? Pretty sure.

This type of entitled male complains about prison rape (I’m a victim but not directly attitude) but hey, aren’t they saying it’s okay and even moral if a man feels lust? They’re directly justifying prison rape.

Since you don’t need to consent if a man wants to injure your body, right?

“I want” is a train of thought even a toddler should be shamed for. When your brain develops beyond this, they’re just taking the piss falling back on it. Either get over it (simply by looking away, as Jesus wisely prescribed) OR they’re so brain damaged (poor impulse control is a dominant sign of low IQ) that they belong in an asylum where the wicked existence of the world won’t ‘tempt’ them to be predators (monasteries are also an option, although probably just a more open model of asylum on the same grounds).

Entitlement is a sick combination of practically every sin, especially pride, envy, greed and obviously lust. Anyone trying to justify it as moral is at best a moral relativist and at worst a rapist looking for social approval.

Sex is not a human need. It never has been (especially for women but I digress). You do not need it. You do not need it to live, either. That is a pleasure rhetoric myth from the 60s Free Love hippy bullshit. “Love is all you need” – okay, stop beating your Asian wife first, John. Same guy: “Imagine all the people, living life in peace…” – apply it to your own house first, you abusive prick.

It’s a sign of the backward atheist times that even guys deriding Muslim rape gangs in one breath will use the next to justify their own aspirations to rape a woman for ‘tempting’ them.* This isn’t India or Pakistan, it’s the First World. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, we shoot them. Women looked better in the 50s (1750s, 1850s, and 1950s) and men weren’t catcalling, harassing, stalking and raping them as punishment for being feminine (which have no doubt, is exactly what it is). They can just go live in places that do punish women for femininity (move to Saudi Arabia) but it won’t make them happy either. You’re not entitled to attention from anyone, which is really what the AA for men guys actually want: to jump up the masculine hierarchy without earning respect.

Woman: <is feminine>

Rapists: it’s free real estate.

“Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife” or daughter or sister or aunt…… etc.

[*Actually, how many fakecels are non-white? Where’s that survey? If most of them are browns who feel entitled to white wimminz, because they moved West, that might explain a lot.]

Applying ghetto culture to white societies has and will be the death of us. Catcalling was just the start. White men should be shamed for acting black like that, it’s so immature, like a dog chasing a car. White people use indoor voices, we don’t ‘holler’. Incels don’t dare turn on rap for brainwashing and insulting white people, a notable omission.

The expansion of the discussion of this story is interesting.

The Gemara comments: Rabbi Ya’akov bar Idi and Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani disagree about this issue. One of them says: The woman in question was a married woman, and the other one says: She was unmarried.The Gemara tries to clarify the issue: Granted, according to the one who saysthat she was a married woman, the matter is properly understood. Since the case involved a severely prohibited forbidden relationship, the Sages did not allow any activity hinting at intimacy. But according to the one who says that she was unmarried, what is the reason for all this opposition? Why did the Sages say that the man must be allowed to die, rather than have the woman do as was requested?

Women aren’t whores unless forced by slavery, simple. God made women with dignity, not as sex toys.

The creeps tend to have three motives – physical obviously, social in bragging about their ‘conquests’ (pathetic) and stealing intimacy, forcing a loss of dignity (that humiliating is pathological, specifically psychopathic).

Naturally, the pathological always claim to be normal and even good, evil lies.

Rav Pappa says: This is due to the potential family flaw, i.e., harm to the family name, as it is not permitted to bring disgrace to the entire family in order to save the lovesick man. Rav Aḥa, son of Rav Ika, says: This is so that the daughters of Israel should not be promiscuous with regard to forbidden sexual relations. Were they to listen to the doctors’ recommendations, Jewish women might lose moral restraint.

Proof narcissists have always existed and saner cultures stamped them down like the cockroaches they are. Rapists (inc. would-be rapists) will literally try to hold society to ransom like we should give a damn about their ‘problems’. Sexually perverse extortion. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, again. White people are simply too civilized and high IQ to consider our own people property, our women aren’t poker chips – not to Western creeps or Middle Eastern ones.

Yes, it is degrading, to the family and the woman, who is also a member of said family.

Ordering round women you aren’t related to is… sad, to say the least. Controlling men are always ironically weak in character, it’s reaction formation.

Nobody should follow the weak, neither women nor men. Appeasement of the freaks is r-selected.

These efforts to corrupt women, in this story or the various incel “I deserve/women should…” posts are depraved.

Spot the r-type:

The Gemara asks: But if the woman was unmarried, let the man marry her.The Gemara answers:His mind would not have been eased by marriage, in accordance with the statement of Rabbi Yitzḥak. As Rabbi Yitzḥak says: Since the day the Temple was destroyed, sexual pleasure was taken away from those who engage in permitted intercourse and given to transgressors, as it is stated: “Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant”(Proverbs 9:17). Therefore, the man could have been cured only by engaging in illicit sexual interaction.

Scorn degeneracy or it defiles society, one example at a time. A rotten apple spoils the barrel.

“let him marry her” implies she or her family wants to let her remain with the lech (Jews, being civilized, didn’t have forced marriage, the woman chose)

Logically, if it was illicit 1. he’s wronging society, 2. he should be punished (stoning should do it) and 3. then it shouldn’t matter what other men or women (inc her father) think, since it wouldn’t be illicit if they approved any intimacy.

You’re not entitled to anything from strangers, anything, from men or women.

This shouldn’t need be explained to adults.

Being logically sound, they also enforced death penalty as a punishment equally for male or female sinners, it was purely based on the crime.

The prohibition and punishment apply both in cases

You can’t run a society on 50% degeneracy.

If men are the moral authority, their immorality is more evil, since their standard is higher by choice.

Even if all women shut their legs tomorrow, men would still sin and probably just with each other (like the Navy).

Take responsibility for your own feels, weaklings.

The baraita continues: Lewdness is stated here, with regard to the punishment: “There shall be no lewdness among you” (Leviticus 20:14), and lewdness is stated there, with regard to the prohibition: “You shall not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter; you shall not take her son’s daughter, or her daughter’s daughter, to uncover her nakedness; they are near kinswomen, it is lewdness” (Leviticus 18:17). It is derived by means of a verbal analogy that just as there the prohibition applies to the woman’s daughter, and the daughter of her daughter, and the daughter of her son, so too here, the punishment of burning applies to one who engages in intercourse with the woman’s daughter, and to the daughter of her daughter, and to the daughter of her son.

See the tie-in to Christian society, this is germane.

So that Jewish story explains Leviticus.

Also, playing Man Card to rape relatives is obviously evil, no “But muh Patriarchy” isn’t get out of Hell free.

Execution by burning is more severe than execution by stoning

That explains Jesus telling the lustful how they’ll burn.

Interestingly, they killed sinners prior to rape (i.e. damaging the woman).

The baraita taught that the word “sin” is referring to women who are forbidden to a man by a prohibition the violation of which renders him liable to receive karet. From here it is derived that a man who attempts to rape a woman who is forbidden to him under penalty of karet may be killed.

And Rabbi Yehuda maintains that the Merciful One says that a rapist must be killed because his victim is prepared to sacrifice her life rather than yield to rape.

Well, yeah. Rape is worse than murder to women. Men would feel the same if they had the same anatomy and/or could get pregnant. The film Alien was a horror film about one man’s fear of rape and being pregnant, true story.

Let the rapist be, she is saying this so that he should not kill her, and therefore the rapist is not killed.

Let the rape victim decide if the rapist is killed, sounds totally fair. He took away her right over her body, it’s kosher she should get a right over his. There is also the common connection between rapists also murdering their victims, so this acknowledges that in a poetic way.

The same laws Christianity is based on also allow self defense to save a life including prevent crime (such as rape).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikuach_nefesh

So killing a rapist as they attempt it is kosher too, but also mentioned in the Bible as crying out (for the mob to kill him).

The ‘doctors’ were appealing to that valid breach of the law (where it was invalid) to prevent death but an entitled degenerate isn’t going to die from lack of sex or all monks would’ve keeled over in six months. The incels who kvetch “but I’ll die without an Asian GF” should just off themselves if they really believed that. I wonder how many are borderlines, because threatening suicide (even to strangers) to manipulate people is textbook borderline personality (and this apparently happened in ancient times).

“But I’ll die because muh Dick”

“Okay, die.” – society.

Naturally, their bluff is false because they come back to it over literally years.

Aren’t you dead yet? Weren’t you supposed to be dead in like, the 90s? Promise?

The First World should mock Muh Dicks the way it did historically when it was proud and coincidentally successful. Victim culture bleeding into sex/rape is predictable but evil. Rapists in prison claiming they dindu nuffin started it. No, men needn’t lay SJW fatties. No, white women needn’t lay smelly Muslims. No no no no no.

Muh Dicks – putting the mental in victim mentality.

The fact many claim to be libertarian (your rights end….!) is uniquely hilarious.

Your agency is crap and you should feel bad. A lot of people don’t get laid, including religious types, they don’t obsess over it or threaten to hurt anyone. And aren’t libertarians claiming any degeneracy as a social good if there’s consent? So their one true evil would be anyone who violates consent…. like SJW fatties or the bitter rapey majority of ‘incels’.

When both Jesus and his sage forebears from his ancestral religion say the same thing: you are responsible for being tempted, not the thing you ogle, then it’s pretty clear what’s what.

Ogling is a sin.

I say thing because art, billboards etc. They even do this to things, hence object in objectification. We call them wankers for a reason.

“allow” the pitiful excuse for a man to die

God wants the weak to perish, he goes on and on about it and how the way is narrow et al. He sends tests all the time.

rather than have the woman do as was requested?Implies she wanted nothing to do with the creep, even as his wife. So basically you had a predator with a personality disorder (but I repeat myself) trying to force a random woman into letting him (by the power of the law!) rape her instead of killing him, as was her legal right to self defense.

I could ‘request’ a lot of things from men, it doesn’t make me entitled to them.
Other people are not wish genies.

Bloody losers. I bet he’d malinger to dodge the draft, too. Coercion is immoral, a sign of low character.

Having freedom of choice is THE freedom of white, First World societies. THE liberty our ancestors died for.

Both employers, the military (and women) can tell you, NO, you’re unsuitable for this role.

And you have to accept that, rejection is a fact of life. Women get rejected all the time, including in CV studies. We also get rejected at the HR level for being too attractive according to the SJW hags residing therein, so this alleged advantage is pure fiction.

We can reject and be rejected. You can’t nag the system of evolution into changing – the bird that picks up no stone has no mate.

This can include if there are no other applicants. There is no obligation to just accept anyone. Plenty of women are single rather than settle for a whiny entitled soyboy who’d dodge the draft. I wonder if the incel subs (which is not all celibate people obviously* as they claim, anymore than LGB bullshit represents most gays) have polled their attributes. e.g. How many so-called incels choose to be fat? Choose not to shower? Choose not to work?

Can those choices really be called the fault of women? They have no qualms blaming fat SJWs for their own weight, even in true medical cases where it’s morally grotesque e.g. permanent Pill damage, thyroid issue, genetic disorder.

*On the contrary, most celibates I’ve met were really happy about it. No drama, no stress, no disease, plenty of time for sublimation into hobbies or work or the family they already have. Maybe the innocuous (minority of internet) incels are just sick of virgin shaming, which is a very real and precise issue (very small but brutal and wrong) to do with sexualisation and objectification of people based on their sex life (and what Hollywood tries to force us to think it “should” be). However, they contribute to that culture by assuming that women are sleeping around without them (and verbally abusing them for the imaginary slight) when statistically their peers are having less sex than their parents and you know most of that’s the minority of thots skewing the already low data a bit higher. If society praised the virtues of the innocuous ones, their chastity, would they be miserable? Doubtful. I put it to you those are not ‘incels’ because they’re not misogynists or rapists or anything like that, they’re not trying to control others either, they’re just sick of Hollywood’s culty pressure to dictate what they do with their dick. That is 100% justified.

The Sages raised a dilemma before Rabbi Ami: Is a descendant of Noah,who is commanded to refrain from idol worship, also commanded about the sanctification of God’s name, or is he not commanded about the sanctification of God’s name?

It’s interesting to read their little tizzies to understand later metaphors and tie-ins to Christianity later.

Funny to note: no report of the wannabe rapist actually dying. Borderlines bluff.

Context in the Bible

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

Why mention sexually immoral and adultery also? By modern, i.e. false, meanings those would be the same point? The same act i.e. sexing someone you aren’t married to, a particular type of intercourse.

I’ve been re-reading the sections with the word ‘adultery’, with the historically accurate context of adultery and it was there the whole time.

The Bible did say to test things so I looked and I’m shocked it’s clearly there in the phrasing. The only possible interpretation given the multiple instances of context like this is the Thou shalt not mongrelize linguistic origin of the Sixth Commandment.

This doesn’t bode well for the weebs and other outbreeding fetishists. “Their end will correspond to their deeds.”

The narrow modern definition is interpreted falsely (with intellectual dishonesty) and this lends new credence to the concept of the Way being narrow i.e. having the full context.

Romans 16:18 For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.

That would be a great way for a Satanist to destroy us, sell us a publicized misinterpretation of a Commandment so many break it. It also justifies their own lusts (belly, loins) as not sinful for the same acts. They flatter greedy fools (the simple) and what are men most easily deceived by? The phallus.

2 Timothy 4:3-4 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.

Equalism aka Liberal Creationism is the myth. Nobody who buys into it can be right-wing i.e. reality-based.

We even have genetics studies, we can physically SEE the differences!

Proverbs: Take the garment of one who puts up security for a stranger; hold it in pledge if it is done for an outsider.

e.g.

Consider the context of:

James 4:4 You adulterers! Don’t you realize that friendship with the world makes you an enemy of God? I say it again: If you want to be a friend of the world, you make yourself an enemy of God.

with the modern limited sense, the use of the concept adultery there is erroneous.

They must mean the deeper, broader rooted sense of the sin.

FYI, scroll to the Sixth Commandment

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl720.htm

“In most translations of the Bible, Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are translated: “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” In the literal translation of the Anointed Standard Translation of the New Testament and in the true translation of the Ten Commandments in The Truth Unveiled, these passages are translated as: “You will not mongrelize”.

In many people’s minds, there is a very great difference between these two translations, though, as we shall see later, this is due primarily to the purposeful degeneration of the etymology of the word adultery. At issue in the Greek Septuagint and in the Greek New Testament are two Greek words: ou moicheuseis. …

In the Latin Vulgate, Exodus 20:13 was translated as non moechaberis and Romans 13:9 as non adulterabis. The Latin word moechaberis is an inflected form of moechari, a transliteration of the Greek moicheuo, and is of little etymological importance since what it means is merely dependent upon what the Greek word means, which we will explore. However, what is important is adulterabis, an inflected form of the word adultero, since this is the Latin word most often used in the Vulgate and elsewhere to translate the Greek word moicheuo. 

The Greek word ou and the Latin word non are simply negative particles, translated not. Thus, the words that we need to define in order to determine the correct translation of Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are the Greek word moicheuo and the Latin word adultero. 

First, in order to define the word moicheuo, let us turn to a commonly used and commonly available dictionary, the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, edited by Gerhard Kittel and translated into English by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Now let us note that Kittel was a well-renowned German Greek scholar and is held in high-esteem by the scholarly community. 

Under the entry word moicheuo, the following definition is given: “of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races.” [In the German original, Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, we find the original words of Kittel: “auch von Vermischung von Tier und Mensch oder von Mischung verschiedener Rassen”]. 

This, of course, is the classical definition of mongrelization. So the Greek of the New Testament and the Greek Septuagint confirm that the translation “You will not mongrelize” is correct. 

Now that we have defined the Greek, what about the Latin Vulgate? Now we must define the Latin word adultero, and we shall do so using the finest Latin dictionary currently available and the standard among Latin scholars, the Oxford Latin Dictionary: “To mix (a substance or kind) with another, adulterate: to impair the purity or strength of, to give a variety of appearances to, change . . . to corrupt, debase.” Once again, when this is applied to people, we have mongrelization. So we find age-old agreement between the Latin and the Greek. 

Therefore, using two of the most respected reference works available regarding Biblical Greek and the Latin language, and simply looking the words up, we find that these verses in the Bible are in fact an explicit prohibition against race-mixing. 

To any intellectually honest person, the above definitions should be more than enough to convince him that the Bible explicitly prohibits race-mixing. This is exactly why the coalition of evil is so against a true and literal translation of the Word of God. In fact, it may be stated that their theology is little more than a justification system for the breaking of this divine law of God. If the translation You will not mongrelize is wrong, then the two reference works cited above, certainly two of the most prestigious works of their type available, are also wrong. Any legitimate Greek or Latin scholars would agree with these definitions; anyone who would disagree with these definitions have in fact turned their backs on legitimate scholarship and should stop being hypocritical and admit that they do not believe the Bible instead of trying to change what it and what legitimate scholars say.

Now, many people will simply go and find a dictionary that defines the above words as adultery, and then ignorantly presume that adultery is defined as marital infidelity and simply forget about the two definitions cited above.

To show the stupidity and intellectual dishonesty of these people, I have previously written a work entitled Hidden Truth, now published under the title The Truth Unveiled, which gave many more proofs of the definitions of the Greek and Latin family of words commonly translated adultery, and examined in detail every Biblical passage, both Old and New Testaments, where these words occurred. That is not the purpose of this present work. The reader is encouraged to also read the chapter regarding this family of words in The Truth Unveiled for a complete Biblical analysis of this family of words. The objective herein is to examine in detail the etymology of both the Greek and Latin words commonly translated adultery, the ways these words were used in other Greek and Latin literature and in key passages in the Bible, and to explore how the web of deception regarding these words has been woven through the degeneration of language. The information presented hereafter is indisputable and not a subject of debate: one will either be intellectually honest and believe it or one will suffer the fate of all liars and those who help make a lie. 

Penny dropped, has it?

Casual Sex Creates Guilt


Wow, it really is the current year.

What’s next, AOC admits Communism/socialism has been tried and always failed?

He’d have done better going with Islam, his ancestral religion.
I wonder how long this will last.

Drug-based religious epiphanies are fake. They’re always deceitful, demonic in nature.

That’s why ‘shamans’, savages and all sorts of occulty bullshit rely on it, including self-aware Satanists.

It’s an illusion and half the attendees of Burning Man experience the same drug-based ‘revelations’.

If God’s word didn’t move you for decades, it wasn’t that. He’s talking about the world, too worldly for it to have been real. He’s also preaching with zero grounds. No humility.

Still, it does seem like he always knew it was wrong to slut around and did it anyway, suggesting a false conversion to control the religious with false piety and twisting lies akin to the CHINO kind. Cynically, it could be a gamble to make money off a fresh demo. In which case, Muslims have more money.

You can’t ‘game’ God into a place in Heaven, nobody will listen to a sinner from the church and this won’t allow him control over white women. It’s laughable if he thinks he can dominate women as a man, women who believe men ain’t shit compared to God.

He seems to be repeating, almost word for word, what many people among us have been saying for years (while he slagged us off for it):

“Sleeping around is the most common example. Outside the confines of love and family, sex is perverse and immoral, because it denies the reproductive aspect of humanity to treat others as masturbatory tools that are used and discarded.”

That’s called objectification and it’s dehumanizing. Congratulations, you agree with the feminists on something (although objectification does exist, it’s connected to the Sexual Revolution, Patriarchy usually protects its women).

“It turns out that men who have received sexual pleasure from sluts will then attack sluts for being… sluts.”

He discovered the wikipedia page on projection. But men who sleep with female sluts are ALSO sluts, that’s what a slut is.


It’s also Madonna/Whore, men who are repulsed by ‘good girls’ as sexual options or cheat on the wife instead of loyalty, with a slutty mistress.

It is a mistake to assume everyone is guilt filled and projecting though.
If they’re not loudly going after people and quietly going about it, they’re probably just naturally promiscuous. Rare, but occurs.

“scarcity of eggs-”
myth, women actually produce new eggs during post-birth life, it’s been studied and that myth debunked
the male gamete constantly refreshes, compounding mutation rates

“shortened window of fertility” paternal age is a huge factor in miscarriage, stillbirth and sub-fertility in men as well, especially after 30 quality starts to drop and after 40 especially (see paternal age tag)
the high autist rate is something researchers have openly blamed on the ‘trend’ for older fathers, trying to deter them from waiting, which the MSM hasn’t amplified as important because it hates you

“You see this in black, Asian, and Indian women who attack “white privilege” and “white supremacy” while simultaneously dating white men or being attracted to them.”

going after white fever, brave

Push that button if you want ANY influence. Sex issues are so 2010, now it’s all about race.

“Other behaviors that create guilt are masturbation, especially with the aid of hardcore pornography, and sodomy, which are both direct forms of self-abuse.”

Both sexes masturbate in their sleep naturally, zero guilt I’ve ever seen reported in studies. If God designed us, that one gets a free pass. Unless it’s the baby Jesus buttplug. Porn causes guilt because it’s voyeurism.

‘Straight’ men engaging in anal are at new risk of previously only homo-common diseases.

and less navel-gazing, America

FIX the problems rather than a circlejerk TALKING.

Priceless inclusion given:

“If I didn’t stop having casual sex, I would find new and ingenious ways to insult women.”

I’m sorry his sister died and all, preventing me from temporarily using harsher words about this convenient conversion, but this guy is sounding like a brown Russell Brand.
Acting like a beast doesn’t ever become washed off the record and to assume one is forgiven before death is pure Churchian. To lecture as if one has moral authority from doing evil is pure Satan. Hubris?
I get the feel why so many of these guys are ‘finding’ Jesus is because they want the Have it all I predicted YEARS ago – they want to fuck around with sluts in the pussy parade then have a Christian (best religion for this) waifu once their T-levels drop and they aged out of clubs.

That won’t happen. You need decades to prepare to be a good husband.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/05/29/global-christianity-is-still-globalism/

I don’t spare dishonest women from critique either.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/05/11/is-homemaker-the-new-welfare-queen/

but the I told ya so is STRONG

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/01/27/born-again-christians-are-the-worst-cucks/

COPE, manwhores, COPE.

The wages of sin last for decades. Seeing how old PUAs end up will be an object lesson.

In the comments are race-mixing guys trying to claim (appeal to exception) that their kids are different or (gag) better.
Thankfully the odd person is pointing out the basic scientific facts, more or less 1. those kids self-hate, since there’s no place for them in the world and they belong nowhere 2. those kids are clinically depressed and 3. they have health issues (so write off grandkids or great-grandkids). No progeny? Wasted investment. Don’t marry any woman based on sex appeal (esp. fetish), duh?

There’s also direct Bible admonishment: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/03/10/they-dont-quote-this-line/

http://biblehub.com/proverbs/5-20.htm

For why should you, my son, be exhilarated with an adulteress And embrace the bosom of a foreigner?

among other choice lines

comment

“I’d rather become a monk/hermit instead of wifing up a different race than mine or a white slut.

Wait until the Tiger Mom divorces kick in with the next recession.

Asians only stay if you pay.

When your income grows stale, they bail!

Grace trumps race in regards to salvation, but not in the material world. Miscegenation is forbidden by the moral law, yet unless you don’t know some biblical Greek you’ll never know.

I am not a friend of the CI movement, but they have some interesting truth nukes you cannot argue with (scroll down to “The Sixth Commandment”): http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl720.htm&#8221;

Here it is:

“In most translations of the Bible, Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are translated: “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” In the literal translation of the Anointed Standard Translation of the New Testament and in the true translation of the Ten Commandments in The Truth Unveiled, these passages are translated as: “You will not mongrelize”.

In many people’s minds, there is a very great difference between these two translations, though, as we shall see later, this is due primarily to the purposeful degeneration of the etymology of the word adultery. At issue in the Greek Septuagint and in the Greek New Testament are two Greek words: ou moicheuseis. …

In the Latin Vulgate, Exodus 20:13 was translated as non moechaberis and Romans 13:9 as non adulterabis. The Latin word moechaberis is an inflected form of moechari, a transliteration of the Greek moicheuo, and is of little etymological importance since what it means is merely dependent upon what the Greek word means, which we will explore. However, what is important is adulterabis, an inflected form of the word adultero, since this is the Latin word most often used in the Vulgate and elsewhere to translate the Greek word moicheuo. 

The Greek word ou and the Latin word non are simply negative particles, translated not. Thus, the words that we need to define in order to determine the correct translation of Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are the Greek word moicheuo and the Latin word adultero. 

I am rarely impressed but congratulations.

First, in order to define the word moicheuo, let us turn to a commonly used and commonly available dictionary, the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, edited by Gerhard Kittel and translated into English by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Now let us note that Kittel was a well-renowned German Greek scholar and is held in high-esteem by the scholarly community. 

Under the entry word moicheuo, the following definition is given: “of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races.” [In the German original, Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, we find the original words of Kittel: “auch von Vermischung von Tier und Mensch oder von Mischung verschiedener Rassen”]. 

This, of course, is the classical definition of mongrelization. So the Greek of the New Testament and the Greek Septuagint confirm that the translation “You will not mongrelize” is correct. 

Now that we have defined the Greek, what about the Latin Vulgate? Now we must define the Latin word adultero, and we shall do so using the finest Latin dictionary currently available and the standard among Latin scholars, the Oxford Latin Dictionary: “To mix (a substance or kind) with another, adulterate: to impair the purity or strength of, to give a variety of appearances to, change . . . to corrupt, debase.” Once again, when this is applied to people, we have mongrelization. So we find age-old agreement between the Latin and the Greek. 

Wow.

This explains their group-level reproductive issues, if explicitly forbidden by God.

Among other details like marital problems, notably the domestic abuse rate.

And divorce rates.

Therefore, using two of the most respected reference works available regarding Biblical Greek and the Latin language, and simply looking the words up, we find that these verses in the Bible are in fact an explicit prohibition against race-mixing. 

To any intellectually honest person, the above definitions should be more than enough to convince him that the Bible explicitly prohibits race-mixing. This is exactly why the coalition of evil is so against a true and literal translation of the Word of God. In fact, it may be stated that their theology is little more than a justification system for the breaking of this divine law of God. If the translation You will not mongrelize is wrong, then the two reference works cited above, certainly two of the most prestigious works of their type available, are also wrong. Any legitimate Greek or Latin scholars would agree with these definitions; anyone who would disagree with these definitions have in fact turned their backs on legitimate scholarship and should stop being hypocritical and admit that they do not believe the Bible instead of trying to change what it and what legitimate scholars say.

Now, many people will simply go and find a dictionary that defines the above words as adultery, and then ignorantly presume that adultery is defined as marital infidelity and simply forget about the two definitions cited above.

To show the stupidity and intellectual dishonesty of these people, I have previously written a work entitled Hidden Truth, now published under the title The Truth Unveiled, which gave many more proofs of the definitions of the Greek and Latin family of words commonly translated adultery, and examined in detail every Biblical passage, both Old and New Testaments, where these words occurred. That is not the purpose of this present work. The reader is encouraged to also read the chapter regarding this family of words in The Truth Unveiled for a complete Biblical analysis of this family of words. The objective herein is to examine in detail the etymology of both the Greek and Latin words commonly translated adultery, the ways these words were used in other Greek and Latin literature and in key passages in the Bible, and to explore how the web of deception regarding these words has been woven through the degeneration of language. The information presented hereafter is indisputable and not a subject of debate: one will either be intellectually honest and believe it or one will suffer the fate of all liars and those who help make a lie. 

Bloody hell, a gentleman and a scholar.


God split the peoples of the world, this was his will.
The mental and physical health issues prove it.

Why will the sluts deny this?

R-selected men sexually select the outgroup, it’s a dominant indicator of what they are.
This is known.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/128777-a-man-s-sexual-choice-is-the-result-and-the-sum
A man who wants kids with the outgroup is an inferior and he’s backing the horse that might accept him.

““A man’s sexual choice is the result and the sum of his fundamental convictions…. He will always be attracted to the woman who reflects his deepest vision of himself, the woman whose surrender permits him to experience a sense of self-esteem. The man who is proudly certain of his own value, will want the highest type of woman he can find, the woman he admires, the strongest, the hardest to conquer–because only the possession of a heroine will give him the sense of an achievement.””

They bet on a future where you are dead, the Beige people world of NWO planning.

The term is race traitor for a reason. There can be no bargaining with people who want to kill you just as assuredly as suicide bombers. They are actively genociding their white DNA (literally gene-cide*) and replacing you like a cuckoo baby in your homeland (they never wanna move out…). No white woman will submit to them out of disgust, they’re almost entirely gammas. Some are involuntary race mixers because no fellow white will have them! Non-whites use them for babies, green cards and money. Among Asians, white>masculinity, that’s why the same guys almost never land objectively better looking Latinas, where it’s inverted and masculinity is prized.

Prove me wrong, internet. How long do fetish spouses last in hard times?

It isn’t a unique (and biologically validated) disgust:

Why do blacks reject mulattoes because something something colorism?

Why do these guys (pictured) all have the same Look, and only land Asians without trouble?

and the eternal classic

Hence, white gammas go weeb. It’s science, more or less.

Frankly, this one looks gay as John Barrowman.

Gays think they’re in the closet because they’re on that r-select sexual spectrum, preferring less dimorphic women.

Why do all weebs have this soft, shriveled look? Some group of men get together and figure this out.

I’ll be called jealous of women with no waist or hips…. somehow.

*Non-whites gain more than 50% dominance breeding with whites, with our recessive genome, hence the fetish for us globally.
I’ve linked to it at some point here. It was mentioned alongside genetic distance.

comment

“The other races (Negroids and Mongoloids) have been created way earlier than the Caucasoids, which is archaelogically and genetically proven. The blue-eyed-gene for example goes back to exactly one common ancestor. Then how comes no Asian or African has colored eyes?”

True but there’s also multi-regional hypothesis.

“You can read in different historical accounts about the decay that (only) mulatto societies have upon morals and environment.

In no small part to lower IQ than the purebred parents and r-selected sexual strategy (quantity over quality) depressing quality of living. The Third World chooses to be poor, because they choose to have too many children. It’s as simple as that. The low IQ detail is compounded in each generation by improper breeding habits, since crime (like rape) and libido are both higher in that demographic, in any race. If they’re gonna infanticide any sex, the ones who rape and rebel would be better candidates. Then there’s the fact each race evolved to its environment and the mixed race (technically raceless) are not well-adapted to any environment, so you’d expect them to comparatively fail in every environment, since it’s about Darwinian genetic competition with those who didn’t mix. I blame the parents who chose this for them. They’d be most competitive to live in the lower IQ society of one of the parents. That’s why conqueror’s kids are an exception, higher IQ DNA dissolving into a lower IQ society (too low is/should be wiped out) succeeds better than the natives, in that case. It fails when reversed.

Change the white society, lose the society.

Needs more genetics, more studies. Generally correct.

What does ‘good breeding’ actually mean? K-select.

Race-mixers are also, in studies, less attractive on average than same-race counterparts. Children are the IQ mean of the individual parents. Look at the national IQs of these brood women and that’s a terrible mean, plus regression to the mean pulling kids down anyway. Galton, ironically.

The darker a person’s skin, the higher their testosterone, again, compounding the r-selection.

Those white guys will find their beige kids resentful, slutty and probably drawn to SJW politics because in their utopia, everybody belongs. They’ll learn, too late.

Elliot Rodger, that Yang Marxist, more to come, I’m sure.

In the Travels of Marco Polo you have an account (Book I, Chapter 14) in which fair-skinned Tartars took black Indian wifes. The mixed race offspring ravaged the city of Camandu, and even acquired magical and diabolical knowledge they used for their raids.

You may have good intentions but misinformation and lacking in knowledge creates more evil than good. As it is written in Hosea 4:6:
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.”

comment

“Instead, he bangs them and then refuses to take part ownership in his own degeneracy.”
Blaming ‘culture’ and ‘society’ and the women is still evading shame. Shame is personal and earned, the bad rep.

What do you expect? They’re r-types! Mentally more akin to a child! Gimme brains!

Let the weeb Other his own kids, as long as he’s happy to self-deport with them when the homeland thing becomes the global norm… again.

That’s in the peaceful scenario.

The SJWs hate ALL white men, even their own father.

Race-mixing won’t be any kind of defense when they come for you, too.

Proof, in the Bible: “21 Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child; children will rise against their parents and have them put to death.”

https://biblehub.com/matthew/10-21.htm

Prediction: Roosh will go some kind of Buddhist then Muslim then a weird hybrid.

Because my my my how the tables have fucking TURNED.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/03/05/roosh-on-the-alt-right-in-his-own-words/

“The alt right is worse than feminism in attempting to control male sexual behavior”

Why did he choose Christian?

Acceptable races are South American, Persian, Armenian, and European (non-Northern).”

I can hear 8chan fire up the gas chambers on that line.

As if “I’m not white. Why should I care about the future of white societies?” wasn’t bad enough.

He talks about subversion and outsiders ruining any open system. So will he try and get in with the TradCons?

At this point I’ll stop feeding the troll PR unless something major happens.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/02/19/some-manospherians-throw-rattle-from-pram-the-alt-right-is-run-by-cucks-now/

I knew this was coming.

Note the ressentiment of ‘it’s secretly the women and their Lilith magic!’ as if adult men aren’t responsible for their own opinions, much like Roosh isn’t responsible for his words coming back to bite him on the a-and I digress.

He wanted his face on it.

They all have the same line. I did that but it isn’t Me anymore. I turned my back on it, accept me. Sure, like a porn star marrying once her career is over. Your Trojan Horse has failed, deal. He finished by saying the phrase ‘rape hysteria’ and playing Damsel because all this attention is apparently a threat to them and their social circle. R-types.

Let’s see if this modest (and holding back) post is taken with the humility we typically expect of this lot.

reading:

https://lookism.net/showthread.php?tid=443231

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Roosh_V

Pharisees of the peen.

Roosh V takes the “God Pill,” embracing Jesus after getting super high on shrooms. No, really

Current year, highlight reel.