Christians cannot support organ ‘donation’

They should push for organs to be lab-grown, which has no strings, but isn’t “free” for the hospitals.
At least in the 18th century, doctors waited until you’d been buried before cutting you up for the socialist “common good”.

Brain-dead doesn’t exist, it’s a guess, like brain “damage”.

It’s odd Americans will fuss about unborn babies but totally ignore ritual butchery of alive adults and children.

You are most vulnerable in hospitals, why did the oldest of the elderly avoid them so? How did they become so old?

The vultures even pressure parents of children with brain conditions with spiritualist New Age nonsense about “living on”. That’s abusive. You know the way they can live on? Not to murder them like yanking carrots out of a garden plot. Physicalism is a cancer, it flouts every religious system, which advises NOT to disjoint the body parts. It is anti-religion and threatens or shames people with religion (who believe in a soul).

The body can’t be “put out” if it’s “donating” and why would they waste pain relief on someone they claim cannot feel?

Bear in mind, neuroscience has proven alternate states of consciousness. Simple EEGs are not done.

Interestingly, if you ask to see the donor cards of a vulture saying what others should do, they don’t have one or it’s a convincing replica.

Then there’s memory transfer, some heart cells in particular have been known to act like neurons. They won’t research why because the families won’t give away the memories (Egyptian soul) of their relatives.

Yah…. cos THAT’s the point where it becomes evil, right?

Not that you’re betraying your relative or spouse to psychopaths too tight to pay laboratories for clean specimens with far higher success rates (more hospital trips and complications, they make even more money).

Two doctors can “declare” you brain-dead as you sit there reading this, grab the rib crackers (don’t look them up) and cut out your still-beating heart for someone THEY deem more worthy to live than you… and that’s legally kosher.

Legal, but not moral.

The SJWs willing to trust any shrink will probably meet that fate.

Declare =/= Prove

How to prove a negative?

The propaganda is heavily anecdotal, one-sided, emotional and vaguely fascist e.g. the government owns your organs.
https://www.kidneycareuk.org/news-and-campaigns/news/organ-donation-bill-passes-final-stage-house-lords/

Oh, openly fascist now apparently.
https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2019/march/royal-assent-organ-donation-deemed-consent-bill-signed-into-law/

This Bill, presented by Mr Geoffrey Robinson, will allow for consent to organ donation in England to be deemed to have been given by a potential adult organ donor before their death unless they have expressly stated that they did not wish to be an organ donor or an exception applies.

I’m sure “lost paperwork” won’t be a factor if your organs happen to be pristine.

Mistakes won’t be made.

You can’t sue to get the organs back, I presume?

And what about a surplus? They sell them. The family see no money.

This is often referred to as an “opt-out” system of consent as people may “opt-out” of becoming an organ donor on the premise that they do not consent.

Organ rape.

You cannot assume consent.

Libertarians are weak.

Objectification, humanity butchered to view us as meat. Everyone just lost their human rights, their property right to their body, and they’re so idiotic they celebrate?

At which age are you assumed to consent to being cut up like a hog?

The lamb praising the slaughter.

The Nazis weren’t this bad, how’s a baby to vouch non-consent? They ‘allow’ those donations. Placentas are stolen.

The NHS already promises you ‘first dibs’ on organs if you donate one yourself. This is evil.

You don’t need to go to Asia to be robbed of a kidney. Anyone thinking this is ‘nice’ can give their liver to the chavs down the road now.

Each according to his need, morons.

Old people aren’t informed, nobody got a letter about this. They’re just saying they can gut you.

The brain is the final organ to die. Hearing goes last.

Remember, the doctors are just following orders.

They brought this in because families kept saying No.

The Nazis were great humanitarians, they “harvested” so many organs.

“Fascism is capitalism in decay.” – Lenin

Criminals all below responsibility age

As if by magic.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-20/not-onion-scholar-makes-moral-case-letting-people-decide-their-own-age

Bio-ethicists say it’s okay to rip organs out of living people without anesthesia.

They are socialists who will say anything is “moral” if you pay them.

You don’t let the guy claiming to be Napoleon lead a battle.

The creeps want to be allowed in child spaces – especially changing rooms.

Bring back cubicles. All people have a right to modesty.

They want to legally force children to “play” with them, including rough and tumble.

Actual mental youth is retardation (slow or stopped development, slow in children, stopped by of age).

Medically, they’re literally claiming to be retarded, in which case, they should lose adult rights – like voting or living away from home.

A minor isn’t allowed a credit card, for example.

They shouldn’t be safe to drive. They cannot view porn.

We already have “mental age” laws – for the retarded.

Ageism doesn’t mean you can change it – it refers to biological maturation and biological aging/dying (gerontology). There’s one fact which is ageist – death. Your telomeres aren’t deluded.

Social ageism simply refers to advantages based on generation of birth e.g. Boomers had cheaper everything to set themselves up. It isn’t pro-old nor pro-young.

Government infantilisation is still abuse, infantilisation is a known abusive tactic.

This is why you kinkshame the fetishists, or they ALL come out.

Feelings entitle you to FUCK ALL.

What is this, temporal dysmorphia?

I think I’d make a rather good go of living in the Victorian era, you don’t see me bitching about it.*

(Cept now.)

*I’d teach them to make/grow opium, thereby cutting out the Chinese. Shouldn’t be hard, it’s a flower.

Be careful what you bring in.

I am hereby old enough to receive full retirement monies and I identify as a life-long theatrical union member, pay me.

A pension used to be earned with full military service (risk of death). We don’t have pensions anymore, we have welfare for managing not to die.

Logically, mothers should get pensions for risking death in the pro-social endeavor of giving society more children. Like Russia’s payment system. It would sweeten taking years out of the workforce, where the primary concern is not having an employer-matched 401k. By the time they cash it in, more of it’s inflated away anyway. Women don’t work in public service all their fertile years to still be there, Old Betsy at 80. Careerists can’t rely on a husband not to abandon them in old age and only work for the pension.

Sex Ed was brought in because of WW1 deaths

http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/school_sex_ed_how_yesterdays_extremists_shaped_the_agenda

It reads like fiction: an estimated 50 to 75 percent of American men were infected with a sexually transmitted disease (STD); in thousands of families, an STD killed one, two, even five of their children; and an incredible 30 percent of all blindness was attributed to STDs. The transmission of STDs was an urgent concern of national health and security—so serious, in fact, that soldiers were court-martialed if they were found to be infected.

These statistics are not from a third-world country in the midst of the AIDs pandemic. These are estimates of syphilis and gonorrhea prevalence in 1904, during the Progressive Era of American history. This surprising STD epidemic is one indication that the “good old days” weren’t so good after all.

As American soldiers headed across the sea to fight World War I, they found themselves far away from the watchful eyes of family and free to enjoy what many thought was a male “sexual necessity.” Few know that the federal government first became interested in what happened in the bedroom, in part, as a matter of national security. Estimates suggest that half of all servicemen had an STD. These men could not dependably protect their fellow soldiers if they were stuck in a foxhole with advanced-stage syphilis.

Simply put, America was in the midst of a public health crisis in the early 1900s. And it was this crisis that sparked the birth of public sex education in America….

Sluts are a serious pathogenic risk to children. This is why they were shamed and ostracized (which they still are, rarely mentioned).
Fuck adults….. with a condom.

When the antibiotic resistance kicks in proper, a lot of people are going to finally regret their “personal” lifestyle choices.

Ethics: If you’re an egalitarian, how come you’re a speciesist?

http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2015/02/if-youre-an-egalitarian-how-come-youre-a-speciesist/

On any of the versions of egalitarianism presented above, the individuals among whom value should be equalised are all those whose lives can go well or badly. They include all sentient beings. Since most nonhuman animals are sentient, our concern about inequality among individuals should be extended to them as well. To exclude some sentient beings from the scope of equality on the grounds of species membership (simply because they are not human) would be unjustified – an instance of speciesist discrimination. Therefore, any sound version of egalitarianism must reject speciesism.

Logically, if chimps were smarter than us, we should let them kill us. According to the egalitarian’s version of sentient value. The death warrant of egalitarian philosophy was written the moment we discovered DNA. Here is a thing which varies between all sentient organic beings, and yes, we can measure it.

I think they intend to use the term anthropocentric, but it’s a good read if you’re into that sort of thing.

Am I the only one who did the reading rdj tony stark

n.b. Being the smartest person in any given room isn’t usually a problem until the reverse never occurs.

How dead do you have to be, to be cut open for organs?

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970204603004577269910906351598

Not as much as you’d hope.

“”I like my dead people cold, stiff, gray and not breathing,” says Dr. Michael A. DeVita of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. “The brain dead are warm, pink and breathing.”

You might also be emitting brainwaves. Most people are surprised to learn that many people who are declared brain dead are never actually tested for higher-brain activity. The 1968 Harvard committee recommended that doctors use electroencephalography (EEG) to make sure the patient has flat brain waves. Today’s tests concentrate on the stalk-like brain stem, in charge of basics such as breathing, sleeping and waking. The EEG would alert doctors if the cortex, the thinking part of your brain, is still active.

But various researchers decided that this test was unnecessary,[sureeee]  so it was eliminated from the mandatory criteria in 1971. They reasoned that, if the brain stem is dead, the higher centers of the brain are also probably dead. [comforting]

But in at least two studies before the 1981 Uniform Determination of Death Act, some “brain-dead” patients were found to be emitting brain waves. One, from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke in the 1970s, found that out of 503 patients who met the usual criteria of brain death, 17 showed activity in an EEG.

Even some of the sharpest critics of the brain-death criteria argue that there is no possibility that donors will be in pain during the harvesting of their organs. One, Robert Truog, professor of medical ethics, anesthesia and pediatrics at Harvard Medical School, compared the topic of pain in an organ donor to an argument over “whether it is OK to kick a rock.” [is he on the register?]

But BHCs (beating heart cadavers) —who don’t receive anesthetics during an organ harvest operation—react to the scalpel like inadequately anesthetized live patients, exhibiting high blood pressure and sometimes soaring heart rates. Doctors say these are simply reflexes.

What if there is sound evidence that you are alive after being declared brain dead? In a 1999 article in the peer-reviewed journal Anesthesiology, Gail A. Van Norman, a professor of anesthesiology at the University of Washington, reported a case in which a 30-year-old patient with severe head trauma began breathing spontaneously after being declared brain dead. The physicians said that, because there was no chance of recovery, he could still be considered dead. The harvest proceeded over the objections of the anesthesiologist, who saw the donor move, and then react to the scalpel with hypertension.

Organ transplantation—from procurement of organs to transplant to the first year of postoperative care—is a $20 billion per year business. Recipients of single-organ transplants—heart, intestine, kidney, liver, single and double lung and pancreas—are charged an average $470,000, ranging from $288,000 for a kidney transplant to $1.2 million for an intestine transplant, according to consulting firm Milliman. Neither donors nor their families can be paid for organs.

It is possible that not being a donor on your license can give you more bargaining power. If you leave instructions with your next of kin, they can perhaps negotiate a better deal. Instead of just the usual icewater-in-the-ears, why not ask for a blood-flow study to make sure your cortex is truly out of commission? [brainstem tests in the UK are medieval, and there’s a good chance you could be awake for these < same brainstem that beats the heart btw, but sure, I guess it’s probably dead…]

And how about some anesthetic? Although he doesn’t believe the brain dead feel pain, Dr. Truog has used two light anesthetics, high-dose fentanyl and sufentanil, which won’t harm organs, to quell high blood pressure or heart rate during harvesting operations. “If it were my family,” he said, “I’d request them.”” [big clue, nudge nudge. Translation: They’d be doing that to my relatives over my dead body.]

You see, the agreed-upon Medical Death is both brain and heart, because of trouble establishing one for certain, it’s a fail-safe to prevent premature burial.
As a University of Minnesota bioethicist explains on an embarrassingly 90s style webpage;

However, the definition of death is open and flexible, at least to some degree.
Death might be closer to a process than an instant.
And when we are considering organ-transplantation, it is especially important to have the organs as alive as possible, so that the organs can resume their functions in the body of the recipient.
Death must be declared before any cutting and harvesting begins.
Otherwise, the transplant surgeons might be accused of causing death by removing vital organs.

Let’s review: your heart can be beating (BHC). Your brain can be firing (any part of it, for argument’s sake). You don’t need anesthetic to be cut open on the word of a single doctor pronouncing your ‘death’, who isn’t doing the scalpel cutting. Because you wrote your name on a register, trusting them to ensure you were actually dead first (when the organs are necrotic and useless). Gee! I wonder why the donations rates are so low!

And as psychology goes on, more states of brain ‘awareness’ are discovered in what we used to consider unconscious or, yes, brain dead. The lights are down, but somebody is home.
http://www.livescience.com/39761-brain-activity-deep-coma.html
http://www.livescience.com/14559-brain-losing-consciousness-3d.html
http://www.livescience.com/39812-strange-consciousness-state-in-surgery.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/06/140609153429.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131202082316.htm < this one is interesting “Uniform protocols, standards for determining brain death needed”
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130918180246.htm

Trans Slate says sexing a baby for records at birth is abuse

http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2014/06/26/infant_gender_assignment_unnecessary_and_potentially_harmful.html

Literally looking and say what is there. They try to make it scary by calling it infant gender assignment. Biological sex isn’t gender. Sex isn’t assigned, you have never been anything else since you existed. Can’t scalpel away every cell in your body.

The metaphor they use can hilariously also be applied to vaccination (peer pressure, side effects)

It ends with:

“Is it better to play the odds, or play it safe? Think carefully. Infant gender assignment might just be Russian roulette with your baby’s life.”

Fearmongering? What fearmongering? There’s no personal agenda here?

I can tell this won’t happen because it interferes with Gov’s desire to acquire personal medical information.
Still fucking annoying though. These people need to be stopped from controlling the lives of others, especially real vulnerable groups like children. It interferes directly with the medical profession on the basis of personal minority belief (but Christianity is meant to be evil) and their ability to do their job. Including save lives.

Imagine the implication. If a child is suffering from a sex-specific ailment, the doctor cannot acknowledge it to treat it. These crazy trans groups enforcing their beliefs on the rest of us will directly cause deaths if they are given their way.