Also fraternal twins, one girl and one boy, they swap DNA.
In any event, the results of this study on 10-15 year old girls showed that 13.6% of the girls tested positive for male microchimerism, which is more or less inline with the previously mentioned study of adult women who’d either only had daughters or never been pregnant, with rates of about 8% and 10% respectively. This also almost exactly lined up with another study on prepubescent girls, with about 14% testing positive for male microchimerism in that study.
As other studies have also shown, the 2015 study researchers also noted that girls who had older brothers were more likely to test positive for male microchimerism, with the more older brothers, the more likely to test positive. They also found girls whose mothers had blood transfusions during pregnancy were more likely to test positive as well.
exactly, it is in blood, especially placental blood
but we can’t do microchimerism studies without ALSO studying men, like do men carry maternal cells? Then it cannot be sexual.
The leading hypotheses is that these are probably coming from things like cases of a vanished and unobserved male twin or, more likely in most cases, a woman, including the mothers of these girls, having been previously pregnant with a boy and they simply didn’t know it. It turns out, depending on what study you want to go with, between 1/3 and just under 1/2 of all human pregnancies result in a miscarriage, with a decent percentage of these happening without the woman actually knowing she was briefly pregnant. Further, a large percentage of the rest of these miscarriages happen before the sex of the baby is known.
Twins can be semi-identical so biology is weird.
Study virgins, ah, but if they found microchimerism ((they’d)) still claim they were lying? Nuns? Maternal cells in gay guys?
It’s possible family cells don’t activate until later, gene expression is like that.
They should study semen for evidence of race mixing. I bet they’d find it. Hey, if you’ve got nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing to fear, right?
Imagine demanding a guy take a cuck test before marrying your daughter.
I long for the day. That’s real power to the Patriarchy, literally testing all your daughter’s suitors.
“when talking the “every partner” narrative, this can conclusively be shown to be false with the known data given that if that were true, virtually every heterosexual woman should test positive for male microchimerism. This is not the case.”
negative evidence, the projecting narcs don’t care though, they want an excuse for their hatred
Test lesbians. Ah, but they don’t want the truth, so they won’t test men either. They have confirmation bias.
But women shed DNA in their vagina. Those are like skin cells, remember. And if STDs can get up the male urethra (and they can), it could happen. Test some weeb in Thailand for Asian DNA in his semen, it’d be funny.
Taking “I think I’m turning Japanese” to the new height of irony.
God, imagine if they found it. Those are the studies we really need.
“the vagina is an incredibly inhospitable place to try to establish a cell line in the first place, including being relatively rapidly self cleaning and good at getting rid of such offending cells.”
self-cleaning = constantly shedding
so it’s more probable that more than 10% of slutty men have female DNA
you can’t just look at one sex for human DNA, you must study both
it reminds me of divorce studies that don’t look at male risk factors, you need a good MO
then if men are strangely clear, despite growing in a woman for 9 months, at least biology would know that!
“But, of course, sperm don’t replicate themselves and only last at most a week or so. So, no. Just no.”
dead fragments – find them in autopsies to prove it? or disprove with lack thereof?
Male Microchimerism in the Human Female Brain
Microchimerism of fetal as well as maternal origin has recently been reported in the mouse brain.
“After giving birth, about 50–75% of women carry fetal immune cell lines. Maternal immune cells are also found in the offspring yielding in maternal→fetal microchimerism, though this phenomenon is about half as frequent as the former.”
So men ALSO carry their mother’s cells … that isn’t impressive, then but the bad faith guys ignore it.
Perfectly innocent explanation. I don’t mind admitting I was wrong, hadn’t looked into it but I know a lot of twins, some virgins. Tests must be possible, especially in animal models.
Source Maternal microchimerism in healthy adults in lymphocytes, monocyte/macrophages and NK cells
“Maternal Mc has recently been found in the peripheral blood of healthy adults.”
okay, study just men?
like a study of just men for maternal or non-maternal female DNA?
that’s the simplest methodology since men can’t make babies! it would rule out pregnancy entirely!
could lead to a homosexuality test – microchimerism with non-related men?
Sperm couldn’t burrow into the uterus though because women shed it every month or less. That would be impossible, unless she got pregnant before the next period but then the immune system would’ve cleared the dead cells, that last a few days up to a week.