Wait, that shit actually works?
I see no reason this could be used for political reasons. No Siree.
Biohackers just want x-ray vision to see tits, let’s be honest.
Notice biohackers never do anything with their dick? What’s gonna happen to it, do they think, when they switch over to their robot body, or pure information form? Chop chop.
And you don’t even have a clitoris, imagine.
Would you give up an evolutionary pleasure button? Aren’t many female biohackers, are there? A woman’s body is already perfect. You don’t mess with that.
You didn’t see the manwhore in AI with a massive real flesh dongle, did you? Big decisions to make. Will you nerd out so much you eunuch yourself a la Bruce Jenner? Well, I guess most of them are circumcised so they’ve technically already lost the joy of it. [Random but: The lawsuits from all that child abuse would be too much to handle. It’s unnatural to chop off something we evolved to have, and women develop a repulsion to it, which doesn’t make it sound better. Jewish mothers really dislike their sons, there’s nothing stopping them doing it to daughters too. At least Muslims are consistent. http://www.circumcision.org/femalesex.htm You can’t trust self-report studies, especially when it comes to the male genitals. Notorious for lying in sexology circles. You can trust the sexual partners, with no identification one way or another, with anonymity (no revenge). The “compensatory” behaviors of circumcised men and shorter endurance show something isn’t right. When you get a strong non-biased methodology, the results of losing most of your genital nerve endings is apparent. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23374102 ]
Fun fact: UK knows dongle to mean penis.