We need national capitalism


https://www.thestate.com/news/business/national-business/article233333612.html

Multi-national (code: multicultural) companies screw over everybody for the sole benefit of faceless ‘rulers’.

If you pillage a tiny amount from lots of countries, they rarely figure it out in time to stop you before you move on.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/29/bridgewaters-ray-dalio-us-economy-must-be-fixed.html

If the average wage rises and companies are expected to largely train in-house again, the welfare state becomes largely unnecessary and shrinks considerably.

Incentivise the prosocial, punish the antisocial.

Visa work is a kinda serfdom anyway.

Rising costs of r-selected overpopulation will spill over into our lives in other ways too.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/india-will-use-more-power-than-europe-us-by-2040-study/articleshow/70504132.cms

A unifying factor is required: race, thede, culture. Nothing less will work.

Plenty of people are ‘nice’ until they hold the whip hand.

Difficult way now, deadly way tomorrow.

https://www.npr.org/2019/05/09/721881130/will-china-overtake-the-us

Competition between the r-selected isn’t good for us either, more workers to compete with.
http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Made-in-Bangladesh-to-overtake-the-Made-in-China-47254.html

And would-be ‘immigrants’ i.e. permanent colonial invaders.

R-populations never stop rising.
https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/india-will-overtake-china-as-worlds-most-populous-country-in-2027-un-report/article28021947.ece#!

Nature culls eventually but at what cost?
Pandemic? War?

Thhe Malthusian trap doesn’t discriminate.

These people are savage (incest, rape, murder aside).
https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/travel/article/3020662/are-indian-travellers-set-overtake-chinese-worlds

And tear one another down for the slightest advantage
https://www.moneyweb.co.za/news-fast-news/youthful-africa-to-overtake-ageing-asia-in-workforce/

There is NO GLOBAL ECONOMY.
http://www.arabnews.com/node/1531661
This is a myth of central bank fiat.

We must dismantle globalism by replacing it. Without replacement, we flounder and fail.

Step 1: active passive resistance i.e. do not fund your replacement.

Step 2: put down roots, help local. But go Galt (read Enjoy the Decline for pointers, Thought Prison to stay sane, The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics to know the enemy’s gameplan).

Step 3: skills and this includes MOOCs, any form of communication basically.

I see no other way.

I was going to post this years ago but decided to see if the news pointed to this as the inevitable Adapt or Die.

around this time: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/16/video-stage-zero-of-white-advocacy/

Lefties lie and pretend like they care about workers while importing their replacement to starve them and also introduce their child’s rapist. It’s like a new Ottoman Empire rising in the West, frankly. They had sex slaves too.

The capitalist actually cares because they’re natural nationalists and capitalism has lifted millions out of poverty thus far.

We still pay foreign aid. Cut all soft colonialism, to zero.
https://www.khaleejtimes.com/india-to-hit-5t-gdp-goal-sooner

R-types invest in other r-types preferentially.
https://en.mercopress.com/2011/04/08/chinese-think-tank-forecasts-bric-countries-to-overtake-the-us-economy-by-2015

They will not reciprocate your Pathological Altruism (another great book), ever.
Their national IQs don’t magically go up, either.

Do not ignore the majority of the population for the Left’s attempt at a ‘gender war’.

Averages matter. The invaders can swarm you. This affects us all.

Their populations will continue to become denser and with global transportation, a huge disease vector for us.

There isn’t enough food to feed everyone. The arable land doesn’t exist on this planet and what we have is being eroded by greedy idiots or polluted by lazy practices (pig deaths). Food security is national security.

Prices won’t stop going up.

https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/india-will-overtake-china-as-worlds-most-populous-country-in-2027-un-report/article28021947.ece

Resources are finite.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-asia-renewables-energy-idUSKCN1SY0MF

Demographics is destiny.

The bigger the rise, the harder the fall. Panic, stupidity and open borders do not mix.

Deport the ones here (weebs too, if they resist) or expect to be outbred, outvoted and generally outgunned.

We are already a minority and with losing what little power we have now, it’ll get worse.

Suck it up.

You can’t fuck or breed your way out of this. There’s just too many of them.

We need to stay sustainable from a food perspective anyway.

But hey, at least they’ll be around to spit on our graves!

White people are literally a minority, get over it SJWs: http://www.prb.org/pdf13/2013-WPDS-infographic_MED.pdf

The civilization right now is an illusion unless we re-purpose what we have (IQ, ingenuity, culture) into strong foundations.

How? No idea. Not a clue. But national capitalism is the system that would work.

The greatest gain goes to those who do it successfully first.

Spoiler: that’s why China is irrationally stoking patriotic sentiment in the citizens.

Communists will subvert nationalism if you let them.

You won’t be a Party member of Patriarchy without a family.

Fascism, historically

Funny to see illiterate Americans make assumptions about what ‘fascism’ is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascist_Manifesto

(she says, linking to wikipedia)

Plot twist: women (and poor men) were empowered as citizens.

Politically, the Manifesto calls for:

  • Universal suffrage with a lowered voting age to 18 years, and voting and electoral office eligibility for all age 25 and up;
  • Proportional representation on a regional basis;
  • Voting for women (which was then opposed by most other European nations);
  • Representation at government level of newly created national councils by economic sector;
  • The abolition of the Italian Senate (at the time, the Senate, as the upper house of parliament, was by process elected by the wealthier citizens, but were in reality direct appointments by the king. It has been described as a sort of extended council of the crown);
  • The formation of a national council of experts for labor, for industry, for transportation, for the public health, for communications, etc. Selections to be made of professionals or of tradesmen with legislative powers, and elected directly to a general commission with ministerial powers.

Scientists in power is a fascist view.

In labor and social policy, the Manifesto calls for:

  • The quick enactment of a law of the state that sanctions aneight-hour workdayfor all workers;
  • Aminimum wage;
  • The participation of workers’ representatives in the functions of industry commissions;
  • To show the same confidence in the labor unions (that prove to be technically and morally worthy) as is given to industry executives or public servants;
  • Reorganization of the railways and the transport sector;
  • Revision of the draft law on invalidity insurance;
  • Reduction of the retirement age from 65 to 55.

Fascists are just socialists that give a damn about your vices and private life.

In military affairs, the Manifesto advocates:

  • Creation of a short-service national militia with specifically defensive responsibilities;
  • Armaments factories are to be nationalized;
  • A peaceful but competitive foreign policy.

In finance, the Manifesto advocates:

  • A strong progressive tax on capital (envisaging a “partial expropriation” of concentrated wealth);
  • The seizure of all the possessions of the religious congregations and the abolition of all the bishoprics, which constitute an enormous liability on the Nation and on the privileges of the poor;

The religious should support being poor, because they want to be holy.

We have state-funded religious schools. In the 21st century.

  • Revision of all contracts for military provisions;
  • The revision of all military contracts and the seizure of 85 percent of the profits therein.

These early positions reflected in the Manifesto would later be characterized by Mussolini in the Doctrine of Fascism as “a series of pointers, forecasts, hints which, when freed from the inevitable matrix of contingencies, were to develop in a few years time into a series of doctrinal positions entitling Fascism to rank as a political doctrine differing from all others, past or present.”[3]

The Marxist root of sociology

Why isn’t sociology considered a science, unlike psychology?

Apparently this isn’t common knowledge and here we are.

http://www.iep.utm.edu/durkheim/

Émile Durkheim was a French sociologist who rose to prominence in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Along with Karl Marx and Max Weber, he is credited as being one of the principal founders of modern sociology.

Max Weber is the most scientific of the trio and he wrote about Protestant capitalism, next comes Durkheim’s work although it is frequently over-applied from intellectual dishonesty. Sociology has limited scope because-

Chief among his claims is that society is a sui generis reality, or a reality unique to itself and irreducible to its composing parts. It is created when individual consciences interact and fuse together to create a synthetic reality that is completely new and greater than the sum of its parts. This reality can only be understood in sociological terms, and cannot be reduced to biological or psychological explanations.

This is true for matters such as national culture (and fits into Weber’s work) but you can easily see how a claim in bad faith on other subjects can be made if everything is subjective and needn’t be proven.
What has psychology done?
Developed observational/behavioural and social psychologies to sweep up whatever is objectively testable.

The other two have no entries on that site.

Weber

http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/protestantethic/summary.html

Max Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism is a study of the relationship between the ethics of ascetic Protestantism and the emergence of the spirit of modern capitalism. Weber argues that the religious ideas of groups such as the Calvinists played a role in creating the capitalistic spirit. Weber first observes a correlation between being Protestant and being involved in business….

It’s very personality psychology and values-based.

Compared to Marx who confused his revenge fantasies with prophecies.
Marx was right about classes and the suffering of the poor but wealth was not the enemy. Status cannot be evenly distributed, even if money is. A political party with no leader struggles, look at OWS.

Video: The story of your enslavement

10/10 would share again. Shop around.

[read after]

Molyneux is the only redpill that hasn’t shamed himself with degeneracy.

Breath of fresh air.

The question you’re not allowed to ask:
Who are the farmers?
There is a social contract of slavery. As soon as you are born, there is a price on your head. What you’re told you owe society. It’s called national debt and ‘we’ can’t even pay the interest. It’s a con. You never agreed to it. This is why people are giving up. There is no fairness or incentive. The system is rigged via the devalued currency.
It’s the scientific model of management, Fordism. They’ll be nice to you, because it keeps you docile. They’ll tell you they care, because it means you’ll behave. They’ll promise you the world, if you work. Which is real? Only the work is real. Communists and capitalists come from largely the same stance, with inverted conclusions. The capitalist wants to be his own boss in this system. The Communist wants to be his own boss, self-employed, direct his own labour, in another system. Each believes they can maximize utility in their chosen system. Overall, there is hardly any difference in what they want – to keep what they earn. But from which State? Marxists think the State cares for them, but Marx wanted to destroy the middle-class, not the owners they are uniquely  empowered to oppose, and he never went into politics. Politicians are rich. They pay themselves above minimum wage and then flout that law to hire illegals. At least the capitalists are somewhat honest about those Homo Economicus motivations. The key difference is theft. Capitalists say enough has happened, wise to how shitty this system is but hopeful about improvement, at least for individuals who…work hard, Communists want more theft, to put the shoe on the other foot and get The Man tomorrow. Who will enforce this? The angry mob? No, they aren’t intelligent. The Man will never force measures against The Man. I alluded this in “Best Post“.

The only thing they care about is what they can take. They can’t take something you haven’t produced. This is a generational strike. Millennials (and younger) won’t get these goodies. There is no bribe, it’s fucking Monopoly money, fairground tickets for broken rides. But we’re still held responsible for governments and debts we weren’t alive to vote for. That’s illegal, it cannot be forced in either case. The system was damned long before we were born. We are not responsible. We cannot save it, nobody can ‘save’ it and they shouldn’t want to. Those people with the power to do anything are dead (they did manage to take it with them, in experiences and hedonism) or at the top of the chain, they don’t see it as a ‘problem’ to fix, a feature, not a bug. Intergenerational betrayal, and the young will live to see it.

Hey, I have been trying to warn people. I’m not alone in this. Why the maybe passive approach?
They control you with lies. It isn’t for public sector pensions, unfunded liabilities – it’s for the children! It isn’t for the whore down the road who you wouldn’t buy a drink, let alone the lifestyle of contraception, it’s for Family Planning! It isn’t for the ingrates in other countries who try to kill us, it’s for the foreign poor! Lions do not own lions because there would be a fight, eventually. We call this empire collapse. However, humans can own humans if they lie about why.

What are you working for? Which system is it, you support? Are you free to say ‘no’, openly, to your owners?

First lie: Who rules over you? Do you know? Do you know their names? Are you allowed to know?
Second lie: Who writes the textbooks? Are you taught the controversies, all moral sides or the Official Party Line? Who decides what is true for the poor, who attend state schooling?
Third lie: What is your currency? What is your value? Does money give you that? Does office paper? Gold? Food? Where is your value? External or internal? Who lies about this? Who says, in effect, ‘you need us, so you’d better behave’ or ‘toe the line, or you’ll be sorry’? Is that not a threat?
Fourth lie: Do the government do things on your behalf, in your name, without asking? Is that a democracy? Do they do the opposite from what they promised? Isn’t this… fraud? Do you even know what they’re doing? Why not tell you?
Fifth lie: Do they divide you from your kin? Isn’t this a distraction? Didn’t this start with preschool, when they told your family to abandon you (causing known psychiatric damage) to the state schooling system? Do you ‘defend’ groups you do not belong to? So… who defends you? Are you allowed to defend yourself?

It is Reverse Psychology and a fair amount of gaslighting (the true purpose of propaganda, doubt your own mind and they run it, in effect). The State tells you that you are worthless, from birth. Without you, they have nothing. They produce nothing. The state is innately parasitic.
Are you allowed or encouraged to succeed, or shamed and guilt-tripped? Isn’t this abuse? In a relationship, wouldn’t this be domestic abuse? Coming the state, isn’t that propaganda? Are you allowed ambition or achievement? Or, whatever you manage to scrape together from these seeds, do you get told ‘you didn’t build that’? Did someone else file those papers, grow those crops and study for those grades?
If they couldn’t profit from their ‘policies’, they wouldn’t push them. Who is held responsible for their failure? Those who created them and promised results (fraud) in academia? The politicians who wrote them into law? Or is the general public called the failure, since nobody is allowed to question anything else? Look to the second question.
Who has the power? The rich? Are they the same thing? What about the bribed? The workers keeping the system going? Who could improve the system? Who runs it? This relates to the first question.
Who claims to be one of you, but drags you down? Who are the crabs in the bucket making you hopeless? Calling you worthless, like the system itself?
What do they promise? What’s the alternative? ‘Bad things might happen‘ – how does that rationale differ from the Boogeyman? This is used on adults, mind.
The ‘arts’ is a good example of unofficial welfare. If you don’t want to see a play, why should you pay actors and co. for a play you’re never going to see? Why should middle-class hobbies be subsidized? Why not football matches? Why not bread and circuses? Who gets priority? Why? Which information do the arts convey to the public, how can they control the proles that the other hobbies and leisure pursuits do not?

How did this happen? Democracy is a good idea but has certain prior conditions that must be met e.g. population homogeneity, industry, longevity. When people step over the line and survive, there is no line. Find the crime without a punishment. People should have freedom, the State (a press-gang of a minority of bullies over the majority People) should never, they must be servants limited by necessity and mutual agreement. That is capitalism as an idea, some libertarianism without the globalism.

Instead, think of the ultimate minority group: the elite. Have some sympathy with the champagne socialists. Someone’s gotta crush the grapes, might as well be yours.

Denial is psychologically easier than dealing with it, they’re primed (the real subliminal effect, look it up) to be immature – less grit, lower impulse control, shorter attention spans than previous generations. We were bred to be weak by the State. Like Carlin said, just smart enough to run the machines but never to question why. We didn’t cause this mess, but this is how we live now. We must deal with it.
In a crisis, there is a normalcy bias. People will walk around as though nothing is wrong. On a societal scale, this is ongoing. There are problems, but not the problems the State feeds and funds. I repeat myself. The State is the enemy of the People, whether it be a Communist or capitalist one. If every man is equal, there can be no judges, no politicians, no lawyers, no preachers, no teachers, every man must stand alone. If every man is equal and not an animal, why need a State?

You could simplify that K-types are producers, the little red hen baking the bread and r-types the swarming locust of consumers.

I wonder what lesson that holds for Ks, when the Malthusian trap, the demographic crunch (or economic correction of all the bubbles popping at once to make ’08 look like a child’s Frozen birthday party) snaps on us. It may not happen overnight, but in politics a week is a year. A few years this would take for the shit to trickle down, a few months tops.

The r-selected need a State because it steals the wealth they cannot, as it steals the wealth they cannot produce themselves. The K-selected, dwindling in number with a small, short boost recently, do not need a State. They use the State to connect with each other. That already existed in ancient times, the tribal business.

What is control, in these contexts? Who is controlling you?

Economics works by quintiles, and taxes from this (aka Who is rich?). If you wanna go the typical way, sure, ask WHO is the 1% and what do they have in common? But realistically, they maintain power as the 20%.

The people screeching about the 1% are doing damage control as false opposition. To have a platform in the first place, to have the MSM’s ear, they are the privileged 20%.

I posted this at the beginning of the year.

Good luck. We’re all going to need it. If you’ve read this far, I sincerely wish you well.

I’m not a racist but-

rracistjustifypedo

Tumblr can be very based.
A visual demonstration of why ad hominem and poisoning the well don’t work, also see the Trump administration.

Instead these people try to gaslight us that our realpolitik concerns are bigoted/uneducated and hence, not REAL. Politics is simply returning to its historical norm, that’s why nobody can stop it, it’s becoming local again. It’s anti-globalist, the failed experiment that led to multiculturalism and mass immigration because capitalist workers are interchangeable and fuck min. wage laws in the First World. Globalism is supranational, Global Capitalism. You think they’d give a shit about third world countries if they had banned child labour? Controlled their population of future child workers? But when they’re adults, they’re more expensive and can revolt, better send them to Europe. They got no factories there. Fuck the First World poor, let’s be like China and enslave our children or cause the prole workers to commit suicide rather than put together Tracy’s iPhone so she can protest capitalism, Starbucks in hand. ‘omg your problems aren’t real u loser. sad!’

whitegenocideacademia

The K-shift is exposing them like a storm exposes worms.

This, after Hillary Clinton used the term in a major speech.

That one slip of a searchable term might’ve handed Trump the White House.

Do you really think Democrats have the level of political engagement or attention to watch those whole speeches? The MSM redpilled against itself. At this point, they’re just making shit up because reporting reality is too hard.

That’s when you feign a sucker punch to the face but swiftly kick them in the nuts. Obvious!

the art of war is deception, young  shitlords sithlords

it’s based on-

it’s based

If racism is possible against the global minority of white people, it can’t be used to guilt trip because it’s no longer exclusive, like an EBT card.

Nobody else has made this connection to globalism yet, I’m the first.

Ask: Who pays the people guarding the borders?

Even the reddest Commie will listen to the economic argument therein. Globalism pits the poor of every country against one another in a war for profit for pigs.

As for me?

I set up the dominoes to watch them fall, dude.

chaos

If I can do a little good with my god-tier destruction abilities, yippy kai yay.

I’m not here for celebrity, I’m here to change history.

How can I cut them in such a way that it’ll still hurt in fifty years’ time?
Verbal shivs are legal and I find that racist. Bitchy putdowns are homosexual art.
Memes are education for the morally and verbally impaired.

shitposting

ah yes toast drinking damon ian nodding

Who suspects the girl? Sexist bitches.

Every time I hear something terribly untrue about my kind, assuming I’m azure-pilled;

sickofyourshit

literally me

hide teh power level

soon baby

soon

Why are lefties protesting Trump?

It’s nice to see ones capable of forming a sentence, other than reeee.

from leftist-daily-reminders.tumblr.com/post/155208709988/how-is-a-general-strike-effective-as-a-protest

By not working, not attending classes, and refusing to consume or buy anything, you are making a statement that you reject your current material conditions. If a strike of large enough scope is achieved, it will remind the ruling class and the working class who the driving force of the system really is (the workers, since without them the wheels can’t turn), and would act as the opening salvo of a larger resistance movement. A general strike on January 20 won’t stop Trump from being President or topple capitalism – but it will create a symbol for people to rally behind, build momentum for the larger resistance, and rob Trump’s inauguration of all dignity and legitimacy.

>implying management isn’t a skilled form of labour

The big spanner in Communism.

If anyone could start a factory and run it successfully, the workers would just start their own. But that’s capitalism, isn’t it, kids?

Instead, it looks like adult babies are throwing their rattle out the pram because they didn’t get their way. Securing Trump a second term from anyone who actually has to go to work, and can’t afford to protest democracy with a mob. Protesting is a mob action. It’s anti-democratic, because why is your group any more deserving of an opinion? That’s the issue with modern leftism.

Also, robots.

OT

It’s impossible to strike a job you don’t have.

It’s impossible to strike a job taken overseas, locally.

It’s impossible to run a strike of citizens with illegals.

It’s impossible for the low IQ to have any kind of employment prospects in the coming high IQ future of society. Someone’s getting fucked. Punch your Trump card now and save yourselves.

shrug lol toldyaso fuck you bateman

VIVE LA TRANSITION.

You overplayed the best possible hand.

Classic liberals committed cultural suicide and now they’re going down after it.
You got what you wanted, idiots. China is rubbing its hands. India switching on its global IT division. All cos you wanted to be lazy, a little more time off and a little more pay. Ironically, you won’t retire now. Ever.

You have a right to the fruit of your labour. There is no transfer of property than productivity.

You are signing a permit to use the machines to provide a fixed outcome, aka employment contract. You do not own the machines. The person who purchased them, owns the machines. Engels never got rid of his factories, did he?

If you urinate in a public park, you do not own the park.
If you use a computer in the library, you do not own the library.
If you work a machine, you do not own the factory.

Property is 9/10 of the law, retards.

What you describe is technically rape, also a civil matter in the definition of theft, the forcible seizure of property. As for the criminal, if there is no property, there is no crime such as rape, since we own our bodies, primarily, including our labour.

China not going to make America’s big mistake

Of trusting them.

Let me guess, they’ll expect us to respect their IP as they continue to steal from everyone else, any other country in the world? yeah, no, don’t think so

bring manufacturing home

we shall anyway

Bonus

the rare sighting of a chite,

a Chinaman, trying to be White

chite

the cowboy hat sells the degeneracy for me

yes I know he’s technically Japanese but work with me here, it’s funnier

Comic: How an economy grows (practical capitalism)

Click to access how-an-economy-grows.pdf

This should be in schools.

moralrighttoproperty

Technically, the property right is the decision-making power to do what you desire with it.

This is why it royally pisses me off to see others try to tell a person what to do with their own property (give it to charity being the most enraging). They’re literally claiming a right while taking the enriched person’s away, while pretending to do them a favour. Next they’ll want to charge for the privilege of hearing unsolicited wrong advice (where they bear no cost).

Advertising stole feminism & they’re STILL complaining + Women on Board lies

When this ad trend goes down, usually we see a buoy from the opposite e.g. Old Spice vs. Pyjama Boy.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11727478/How-advertising-hijacked-feminism.-Big-time.html

Feminists know when something smells fishy.

….Welcome to the world of femvertising: where the hard sell has been ‘pinkwashed’ and replaced by something resembling a social conscience, and where advertisers are falling over each other to climb on board the feminist bandwagon.

…On the face of it, this might seem like a giant step forward for the industry. But is it as heartwarming as it seems? Aren’t we still just being sold to? Surely half the world’s population can’t be ‘having a moment’….

Meanwhile, Protein World is showing them how it’s done.
Who makes you more money long-term – a loud minority niche group ready to trigger on you eventually or a silent majority tired of their BS? They’re looking for proof, and something to calm down the stockholders at the meetings, who pay too much attention to Twitter because they’re too ancient to realise it’s a microcosm echo chamber without corporate relevance.

…It’s what women want. Last year, lifestyle website SheKnows surveyed more than 600 women about femvertising. A staggering 91 per cent believed that how women are portrayed in ads has a direct impact on girls’ self-esteem, and 94 per cent said that depicting women as sex symbols is harmful.

These women aren’t the sharpest tools in the box.
Note how they didn’t report how many, of those, actually purchased? Like the Dove campaign, it actually made sales plummet, because they got all their goodfeels from the Product (TM) advert – why would they need to spend more money on the product itself? (Original purpose for goodfeels marketing).

It also showed that femvertising can pay – half (52 per cent) had purchased a product because they liked how the ads potrayed women.

Did they say that unprompted?
How fickle is this 50% of your share?

Blackett suggests the move towards honesty in advertising is, in part, down to the recession. But I think the answer is much simpler: social media.

This girl is dumb.

Women have long held the spending power. Now, through social media, we’ve found a place to communicate that. We can hold advertisers – and anyone else perceived not to be meeting our needs – directly accountable (think Protein World’s ‘beach body ready’ billboards).

We can expose the realities of female life (#EverydaySexism) and rally behind causes via hashtag activism (think #bringbackourgirls #iammalala #yesallwomen). We can go into battle to see Jane Austen out on the tenner or to defend the victims of Gamergate.

oh no oh dear hides facepalm double
Blogs own your job, bitch. It’s over. MSM/Print is dead.
Bloggers do your shit for free and better.

Here is a place where the soft power – read influence – of women has never been more apparent.

False equivalence, most women are not feminists.
View at Medium.com

Our online presence is dominant (we use social media more, and we do 62 per cent of all online sharing).

Pictures of a druggie and stories about how much you hate yourselves don’t count.

We also have increasing power in the workplace – British boards now have 23.5 per cent women according to the latest Lord Davies report….

Actually in the FTSE250 in this report, as I said here;

FTSE250: 26% female MDs. Above the target of 25%.
YOU HAVE WHAT YOU WANTED ALREADY. THE DATA IS RIGHT THERE.

and

In the US, 40.2% of TEA was accounted for be women.

head desk blackadder give up
Strangely, this report has gone missing (cough sabotage cough). Thankfully we have a cache to the page: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:gQjjZsLE5u0J:www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN06152.pd+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

And it does link to a very recent briefing paper: http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06152/SN06152.pdf
Which edits out the FTSE250 data and gives the 100 ONLY. That isn’t dodgy at all
This paper, yes, EU>our Government, snidely implies all-male boards will be banned in the top FTSE (I’m pretty sure this flouts corporate law and the rights of the stockholders with veto power), and since they’re publicly traded this can be regulated to an extent. On the economic losses, they have hidden their coverup of a lie in footnote 20 in this document, man I love the footnotes, protip always read those first: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldeucom/58/58.pdf which reads;

It should be stressed that we reject any suggestion that improved diversity would be to the detriment of company performance, as was argued in some submissions we received.44 As the Employment Lawyers’ Association (ELA) stated, “it is difficult to see what disadvantages companies could suffer by reason of a higher representation of women on boards”.45 However, as the Minister said, “causality is probably impossible to prove one way or the other … ”.46 If this express link to financial performance cannot be proven more robustly, then it should be discarded from the argument. To do otherwise would put a case that cannot be proven at the centre of an argument for policy change. We urge the Government to argue forthrightly the case for improved gender diversity based on the “whole range of different advantages” that balance can bring,47 rather than on the direct financial impact of increased female board representation.

It cannot be proven if you suppress the evidence.
Notice they never outright lie? I love that about EU shills.
I’d sue or demand insurance that if the law forces them to take on bad hires, either they get the right to sack them and take on whomever they want or they get a massive payout greater than the loss. I did a little digging, for those who want to contact the people telling the truth on this.
The evidence to support this hatefact was submitted by Ray Russell, Michael Klein, and as ‘Campaign for Merit in Business’ and you can see the links here: https://c4mb.wordpress.com/2012/07/26/house-of-lords-select-committe-inquiry-on-women-on-boards-written-evidence-submitted/ who added “We’ve been in touch with most of these groups, and none has offered a shred of evidence of a positive causal relationship between more women on boards and enhanced corporate performance.

It doesn’t exist, dawg. Technically, the law was brought through on a known lie, making it invalid and a breach of NGO power (you know they’re the ones pushing this). These companies could hustle together and file a class-action lawsuit. I mean, if they read silly little blogs like mine…
In Europe, recent legal changes allowed this if it’s in civilian benefit (they can be stockholders of the PLC structure) – just a thought….

Back to the dumb girl…

…. It’s a powerful message and one that’s also had plenty of ad-world back slapping (along with #LikeAGirl it won a coveted glass lion at the Cannes Lion ad awards earlier this month).

The starting point for the campaign was research: through talking to women came the realisation that they weren’t doing sport out of fear of being judged, even though 75 per cent wanted to…..

All the prestige and $$$$.
They must be hitting up against the original idea wall soon, like Hollywood. Scraping out the last of their credibility could be funny. We should mock them mercilessly when that day arrives.

…It smacked of a company adopting feminism because it seemed trendy; out of self interest. That’s where brands like Sport England and Always have got it right – they’re turning the mirror back on us. The moment those women in the first #LikeAGirl ad understood they’d been fed a cliche about their own gender was powerful, regardless of the motive. …

These people will never be happy.

…Indeed, femvertising is hugely popular with millennials who, recent studies show, value ethics over money. …

They have no money.

But this younger generation of women will see through such advertising strategies if they become too shallow. The more brands strive to appeal to them via ‘social movements’ or experiments, the more they risk becoming formulaic.

#Girls

…So where next for femvertising? Personally, I think we desperately need more diversity on our screens. …

Companies – They’re gonna destroy you. They only care about pushing their beliefs, they’re like the New Church Ladies.
Women don’t aspire to ugly. You will lose.


Go ahead, with my full blessing.
Do everything they say and when they drop you, the rest of us will let you go under.

…Plus, if femvertising is truly going to be real isn’t it about time we saw red, not blue, liquid used in ads for sanitary towels and tampons? (It’s a myth that ASA rules prohibit this). ..

See what I mean?

…”We need to normalise the experience of being a woman in advertising. If companies have any sense at all they will embrace it and future proof their business.” …

You made your bed, motherfuckers.