Ishtar or Mary?

https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1991480

“Ishtar’s worshipers addressed her as “the Virgin,” “Holy Virgin,” and “Virgin Mother.” The ancient Sumero-Akkadian “Prayer of Lamentation to Ishtar” states: “I pray to thee, O Lady of ladies, goddess of goddesses. O Ishtar, queen of all peoples. . . . O possessor of all divine power, who wears the crown of dominion. . . . Chapels, holy places, sacred sites, and shrines pay heed to thee. . . . Where are thy likenesses not fashioned? . . . See me O my Lady; accept my prayers.”

No such thing as “sacred prostitute”, Satanists lie. (conflation enhances their “power”, they think)

Then there’s the “witch hunt” smearing of old pagan religions during the Middle Ages, ironically by Satanists. Lying about history isn’t something a Christian needs to do.

“It spread throughout Mesopotamia, and either Ishtar herself or goddesses with different names but similar attributes were worshiped in Egypt, Phoenicia, and Canaan, as well as in Anatolia (Asia Minor), Greece, and Italy.”

Different name, different deity.

A child-killing whore is about as far contrary as one can get in attribute to a Virgin Mother or Holy Virgin.

“The principal mother-goddess worshiped in Egypt was Isis.”

A wife and mother and healer.
Up isn’t down.
Not to be confused with

“In Phoenicia and Canaan, mother-goddess worship focused on Ashtoreth, or Astarte, said to be the wife of Baal. Like her Babylonian counterpart, Ishtar, she was both a fertility and a war goddess. In Egypt ancient inscriptions have been found in which Astarte is called lady of heaven and queen of the heavens. The Israelites had to put up a constant fight against the degrading influence of the worship of this fertility goddess.”

Degrading? Not the others, then. Isis was faithful to Osiris, famous for it and he was faithful to her. If men didn’t make fertility a woman’s prime value in those days, there’d be no demand for a fertility goddess, would there?
Lumping them all in together because they have breasts is lying. Where’s Hera? She was a vengeful piece of work like Kaali/Durga.
It’s like confusing Jesus with John the Baptist. It’s not even wrong.

“In Rome, Venus was the goddess of love and, as such, corresponded to the Greek Aphrodite and the Babylonian Ishtar. The Romans, however, also worshiped the goddesses Isis, Cybele, and Minerva (Greek Athena), all of whom reflected in one way or another the Babylonian archetype Ishtar.”

Minerva was a Virgin Goddess, sexually Egyptians worshiped Hathor and others, Isis was a sacred wife like Juno.

So much information online is completely wrong.

I can’t help but think it’s intentional.

next page

“Vatican II encouraged the cult of the “Blessed Virgin.” Pope John Paul II is well-known for his ardent devotion to Mary. During his extensive travels, he never misses an opportunity to visit Marian shrines”

Thou shalt have no other gods but me….

See anything missing?

What does no one discuss?

Jesus is the Virgin God.

Witch or Catholic?

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/mistic/religionsplanetearth85.htm

uncomfortable reading

100% true

Catholics don’t even worship a male deity, they worship “Mary”, either a human, ghost (necromancy) or a form of Venus.

Irony?

And if you think the Witch Hunts were motivated by Christianity, of the real, Thou shalt not kill variety, you’d be wrong.
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/cienciareal/cienciareal11.htm
“Open hunting season was declared on women, especially herb gatherers, midwives, widows and spinsters. Women who had no man to supervise them were of course highly suspicious.”

Medicine never recovering as a subject was a coincidence.

“It has been estimated by Dr. Marija Gimbutas, professor of archaeology at the University of California, that as many as 9 million people, overwhelmingly women, were burned or hanged during the witch-craze.”

The hallucinations of Satanists or post-Christian witches (inverted Christianity, not really paganism, which predates it) are easily explained by this: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/cienciareal/cienciareal58.htm
“The gurus who developed the exercise clearly recognized its tulpa aspect as well, for the whole experience was actually a test.
If the pupil succeeded in creating a Yidam that would walk and talk with him, his teacher would tell him his studies were ended since he now had the wisest and most powerful teacher possible. But the pupil who accepted this evaluation was deemed to be a failure – and sent off to spend the rest of his life locked into a comforting hallucination.
There were, however, a few pupils who expressed doubts.”

I’ve always found Satanic hallucination stories quite adorable for this very reason.

They literally tell you to do the same shit with summoning circles, exactly the same!

All the demonology books are rip-offs of the medieval manuscript form of the Devil, which is menacing in appearance and essentially the Yidam.

MPAI.

The Eastern dragon resemblance is no coincidence. The Devil doesn’t have horns because of Pan. The Eastern dragon resembles a long snake. Hm, I wonder how that relates to Satan?

It’s basically an imaginary friend telling them whatever they want to hear.

The writers were competing to write the most ridiculous crap that idiots would go on to claim they saw!

They’re such wastes of space it just tells them to kill people, the narcissist’s motive!

The whole thing is an ancient troll!

Mary Worship, paganism, and the demonic influence of roses

Interesting, at least from an historical perspective.

No mortal can forgive sin, this includes the Pope. You are only forgiven by Jesus as a conduit to God Himself. This is Bible 101, kids. I’m tired of people assuming God has forgiven them because Person said a Thing. Nope, you’re never quite certain until you die, and Works are not barter chips for Heaven. Realtalk.

You can tell the Mary stuff is idolatry because they speak of her as equal to the Lord, to Jesus, and they describe her in the exact terms of Gaia, literal Mother Earth, hence the ties to shrubbery. “The rose was a privileged symbol for Mary, Queen of heaven and earth.” Floral metaphors are usually symbolic of the labia, this also applies to the symbol of Christianity, Vesica Pisces, symbolizing …Mary’s vulva. They’re literally worshiping the woman who gave birth to the One, instead of the One. Never pray to someone who died and didn’t come back (an act of divine intervention), the death of Mary isn’t even mentioned by the Bible, she’s such a non-entity.

There is a story in paganism of the formation of the rose. Well, there are many.
Other stories
http://www.rosemagazine.com/articles07/rose_folklore/
http://www.theflowerexpert.com/content/miscellaneous/flowersandhistory/history-of-roses
Beauty and the Beast reads similar to Psyche. http://www.greeka.com/greece-myths/eros-psyche.htm
“From that moment on, Eros and Psyche lived happily together in their lovely palace, which was always full of roses and other flowers.”
http://www.mythencyclopedia.com/Fi-Go/Flowers-in-Mythology.html
“The Romans also saw roses as a symbol of death and rebirth, and they often planted them on graves.”
They are connected to death, contrary to popular belief.

For the lolz, same YTer.

Maybe Donald won by the occult too. Religious police are bad for the religious because the State thinks it is God.

How TF could a Protestant, taught by a Freemason, hire a Catholic group to represent Christians????
The Catholics called themselves the original Church, but they didn’t require a massive male-exclusive city rife with scandal, taking all your money and political power. The original Christians were underground, opposed to such things, Jesus never called for anything like a Papacy.

The French Disease, the C of E and modern history

inspired by
http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/britains-prince-charles-sees-return-to-dark-days-of-thirties#comment-313855

I decided I need to explain more fully. I’ll be brief and short on proof because you can literally just Google-fu most of it, seriously. It’s literally history. This is about connections. Credit me, biches.

thinking-cap

 

Manwhoring as it’s now known might’ve decided the course of modern history. Fornication is forbidden by the Bible, but nobody asks the punishment for unmarried men?

Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.

First of all, art history. No, really. Seriously, look.

Who is this?

Who is this?

Jesus, right? White Jesus. Regardless of your opinions on the genetics and hue of the region at the time, there is a typical Renaissance image associated with Jesus from this period. It’s oddly youthful and mercurial.

Except that isn’t Jesus. The White Jesus iconography is based on one of the most despicable men in history, the basis for Machiavelli’s Prince. It was based on the bastard son of the Pope, Cesare Borgia.

This Spanish, incestuous piece of shit. Read around about it, he’s worse than Hitler. He deserves to have his name spat on the way people do about Hitler now.
Instead, we continue to depict his likeness as The Christ.

http://macquirelatory.com/False%20Images%20of%20Christ.htm

Who did this portrayal? Leonardo da Vinci. Paid by the Catholic Church, headed by… a Borgia. His father.

…Jesus Christ…

There’s vanity and then there’s demanding someone paint your son as the Son of God, Saviour of Man.

It’s some Alexander-level egotism. Alexander the Great claimed to be a demi-god too.

Before people could read widely, they read paintings, symbolically.

But that which is made with hands is cursed, as well it, as he that made it: he, because he made it; and it, because, being corruptible, it was called god.

I don’t trust Catholic statues for this reason.
They’re creepy. Paintings, fine, but a statue? An idol? No. No, thank you.
I’m pretty sure there was a story about that.

There’s an interesting story that this mystery ‘model’ might be Judas too, twisted by time and sin.
http://www.cjpwisdomandlife.com/davinci-last-supper-judas-jesus/

Ugliness, the wages of sin. They do appear similar, perhaps a reference to Cesare’s public and private face?

http://www.constitution.org/mac/prince17.htm
also http://www.bartleby.com/36/1/17.html

Cesare is mentioned by name preceding its most famous and misquoted passage.

Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with.

The full passage is eye-opening indeed.

fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails.

Speaking of the mask of celebrity.

http://ianchadwick.com/machiavelli/chapters-15-21/chapter-15-looking-good-acting-bad/
OT: Machiavelli and Leonardo da Vinci were friends, Assassin’s Creed was truthful.
They tried to collaborate on a river project, what a mash-up.
Why wouldn’t they discuss Cesare, both involved in the constant war of the time?

Machiavelli wrote the Prince to curry Cesare’s favour by praising his decisions.
Medici money had its limits, unlike the Papacy. Gold thrones, y’all.
Truly, it should be known as Cesarism, not Machiavellianism.

Anyway, the rampant sexuality of the Cardinals, up to and including the Borgia Pope himself, have given it a reputation that continues to this day with paedophilia scandals (women were banned from most of the Vatican).
“At present, Vatican City is the only country where men but not women have voting rights.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Alexander_VI

Therefore his Italianized Valencian surname, Borgia, became a byword for libertinism and nepotism, which are traditionally considered as characterizing his pontificate.

I mean, there are books about this stuff. Do I need to keep linking fact or can we crack on?

TLDRBooks: Cesare caught syphilis in 1497. It might’ve made him more evil, a feat supposedly possible.

To avoid going into hiding like possibly, literally Hitler, he wore “a leather mask covering half his face (disfigured possibly by syphilis during his late years).”

If only men weren’t crazy about pussy, eh? Far more evidence they’re the hysterical ones, isn’t there?

Maybe that’s why we call it his-story? It’s the story of STDs, r-selected men being the primary carriers.

Fast forward to Henry VIII. He had the ‘French Disease’, syphilis. Nobody knows quite how, he got around. Is it a hint if I hyperlink?
To escape France and it’s pimp hand, The Pope, Henry formed the Church of England (colloquially C of E), which doesn’t hate women, allowed him to marry a prettier one, allows the book of Common Prayer in a common tongue and doesn’t take all your beer money overseas to keep the sexual deviant who gave you The French Disease in silken socks.

Allegedly.

This would explain why Elizabeth wanted to keep her wits about her and remain a Virgin Queen.

The nobles shared prostitutes and wives, they were pretty much all infected with something.
That’s why their babies kept dying. On top of everything.

Who worked for this French deviant? Why, Leonardo!
Who might Anne Boleyn have met at the French court? Leonardo, again.

Where does syphilis spread fastest? Well, much like HIV, homosexuality in men, again.
We do know a direct descendant was of that persuasion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_III_of_France#Sexuality
And we all know the French court was decadent, almost manic, grandiose and well, a bit loopy.

Symptoms of the French Disease.

Mad King Georgey had some type of ailment but nobody can pinpoint what exactly.
Seemed a little bipolar, mouth watering,, difficulty seeing, bit loopy…
Syphilis is also known as the ‘great imitator’, looking like many diseases to the untrained eye.
It’s a matter of psychiatry in the latter stages. This didn’t exist.

Where did this dread disease come from? Why did it suddenly get through Europe?

Well, the French disease, isn’t French. It was actually brought back by Columbus’ crew from America.

Why can’t men keep it in their pants, seriously? That’s much worse than measles, smallpox and flu.
It’s the Renaissance HIV, it might’ve ended the Renaissance as we know it.

However, it took up permanent root in the French court swiftly (homosexuality marks out the French, free lovers) and might’ve been the hidden cause of the decadence that led the French people to guillotine them.

http://thisisversaillesmadame.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/sickness-of-shame-syphilis.html
Some of those symptoms may be familiar.

The court in which Louis XIV grew up in definitely saw syphilis as a sign of god’s wrath for a misspent life.

By 1736 the problem had become so imminent that Jean Astruc, royal physician to Louis XV, wrote one of his greater works on the disease.

It can be passed onto children if the pregnant mother catches it from the father.

Fast-forward again to the modern day.

It’s returning because middle-aged men can’t keep it in their pants. AGAIN.

It has come back to Europe, like TB, with mass immigration and promiscuity of former debauched eras.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233310/Syphilis-scourge-kings-dictators-old-surging-back.html

We are the age of super-gonorrhea. I’d suggest either of these as candidates for Gay Germ theory.

Thanks, Sexual Revolution!

The feminists lost the plot when they denied the unique female power of maternity. Men kill men, women kill their babies. Men kill their future babies and drive their women hysterical with STDs (see Lincoln’s wife).

The true sexual revolution were the libertines, extreme hedons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertine

They only came about after the introduction and spread of syphilis into Europe.

Wait, does Britain have a Mad King in modernity?

There is a rumour about Charlie’s adultery. A certain infection Camilla might’ve picked up at school that ravished her looks early… God’s wrath indeed.
https://www.occams-razor.info/2005/04/a_salute_to_rea.html
“There was also the obvious concern that the king or queen would not contract sexually transmitted diseases like syphilis, which was quite common through much of human history.”

I’ve written before on the fact STDs were considered evil because they were passed from whores to mothers, and on to babies, who they tend to murder. It’s like the male form of abortion. Lincoln’s children might’ve died because of his disease.

http://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/2015/camilla-parker-bowles-openly-mocks-princess-diana-prince-charles-condones-it-prince-william-prince-harry-would-be-mortified/

It’s almost impossible to keep any references to this online for long, but it’s spoken of quite openly in London.

“It wouldn’t surprise me.”

Syphilis produces many of its third-stage neurosyphilitic symptoms with physical degeneration. It is found by autopsy, physically.
One symptom is weakened impulse control e.g. Ivan the Terrible murdering his own son in a manic fit of rage (mixed episode, clinically). This is also called hypofrontality. Porn addiction can cause it too.

http://www.yourbrainonporn.com/garys-research-hypofrontality

Hypofrontality may be a temporary boon to creativity, a side effect of schizophrenia-like bursts of erratic mental energy, explaining the slutty artist who later loses it and tops himself.

https://subtleyoga.com/2015/02/19/neuroscience-hoga-yoga-helps-mental-health-part-6-transient-hypofrontality/

How many lefties love meditation and yoga?

The ‘mindless’ trend? Brainlessness, celebrated by these people?

Transient hypofrontality is an (obviously) technical term meaning large portions of your prefrontal cortex have deactivated and brain activity is now dancing around various circuits.

THAT IS NOT A GOOD THING.

No Noooooo are you kidding me wtf are you testing me satan

Frontal lobe is known to generally code for common sense, self-control, logic and reason.
Hypofrontality is heavily r-type, as a mode of cognition.

They don’t have anxiety, they likely have brain damage, by self-report.

I’ve leave you to these dark thoughts and hidden facts.

Throughout modern history, what if the women weren’t crazy? This idea only really came about during the Renaissance, when men became the lascivious ones.
What if they had an STD thanks to slutty hubby?
What if their own reasoning was twisted by the same?
What if this was passed through the seed?
What would be a great way to punish prideful man, that doesn’t keep monogamy or respect purity?

Drive his wife to madness and kill his babies.

I’m slightly ripping off Carlin here but he thought it was AIDs.
“maybe it could be spread sexually, making them a little reluctant to engage in the act of reproduction” source

We had syphilis originally, then HIV and now Ebola. All deadly STDs.
Who would be empty-headed enough to sleep around, despite these?

http://www.charismamag.com/life/women/27015-6-reasons-this-popular-meditation-trend-is-dangerous-for-christians

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Sins-of-the-Father/

Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear [the guilty]; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children’s children, unto the third and to the fourth [generation].

What could do that?

Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

A microbe? A pathogen, maybe?
Between generations, biologically, that would mean sexually.

drinking tired of this shit michael fassbender

What would be a divine sign, if there were to be a plague on man?

The evolution of the natural world beyond the mastery of man.

Antibiotic resistance.

#mic drop#