1. A warning.
1. A warning.
Everyone thinks this year.
Nope, next year. This needs to go down properly.
I said Harvey was the tip.
Just the tip.
A needle on the tip.
A grain of sand on the needle on the tip.
It’ll be like the world shaking off fleas.
TLDR: It doesn’t mention cucking (and lesbian threesomes count), wife-swapping, multiple divorce or enslaved prostitute rings.
You can’t take advice from a degenerate who can’t do a simple thing like get married, stay married, be a good spouse.
The Hollywood proximity is deliberate. They don’t all live in Alaska.
No, they go to Burning Man.
Musk isn’t even a scientist, he’s a famous businessman with tons of media friends and PR. He’s Edison. Scientism sucks, I don’t care how cool the pitch. It’s always lies.
I’m picturing the meltdown of his fanbase, I can’t wait. Pride goeth and if his ego gets any bigger, he can get to Mars purely by the helium in his head. Then spontaneously combust with the outdated element.
YOU ARE THE ELITE.
YOU ARE THE RICH.
WE DON’T WANNA EAT YOU.
GET HOLLYWOOD TO PAY ITS TAXES.
STOP GETTING YOUR BULLSHIT MADE IN SWEAT SHOPS.
STOP USING ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT LABOUR FOR YOUR BRATS OR YOUR FOOD.
STOP WITH THE PRIVATE JETS.
then we’ll see if you still feel the compulsion to virtue signal.
I’ve been waiting to roll this one out again.
Esteem without erudition is a bad thing.
Technically, esteem is old. However, it relates to respect in society, in the family model, it’s fully social and honour, personal honour based on virtue and the elimination of vice (so no visiting brothels or carousing). If you were a gentle-person, you were HELD “in esteem”. You don’t get to choose it for yourself. It’s like letting lottery players pick the winner. They can try to change the definition but in adults, that’s what esteem still means.
It is not popularity or friendliness. It is moral authority and intellectual adeptness. A genius is esteemed for their brilliance, a priest is esteemed for their sage purity.
Kids are meant to have esteem in their development. Sure, you might be growing new hair in strange places but this is normal.
Matured adults? You’re meant to have a stable identity, yet we still see teenage habits, patterns and thought processes. It’s disgusting.
They’re backwards, hardly immature exactly but regressing.
As in, they’ll become more emotionally unstable with time, as the duties of adulthood overwhelm them and they falsely view these as a burden, while suffering for the childhood potential they refuse to admit is over.
e.g. those intolerable Baby Boomers weren’t as insufferable 20 years ago, and 20 years before that would probably have seemed okay.
It’s called spoiled rotten for a reason, entitlement is a cancer that sinks in early.
Peter Pan was a warning, a child snatcher would take you and kill you, sure, but becoming a Lost Boy would ruin your life and deaden any potential you might’ve had.
It’s no coincidence in the original, Peter murders them, rather than “letting” them grow up.
Your feelings lie. Your feelings can be totally and utterly false, wrong, bad. In fact, if there’s a major problem in your life, your emotions probably reflect this. They test nothing, Byron was a wreck.
If only we had been warned about this.
Feelings are largely reactions to physical and circumstantial states.
Especially if you claim not to believe in “biological determinism” (nature).
Therapy wouldn’t ever be needed if feelings were always logical, right and pure.
Our society wants people to glow with virtue, while demonstrating none. Kinda like staring at a glass of Vitamin C rich OJ and hoping it’ll displace your cold.
We listen to our “feelings” (usually a cover for the baser instincts and impulses) to smother the conscience.
Beneath that, spirit. I won’t hold my breath on that one.
You will pay eventually.
Stolen esteem (we used to call that hubris) + Shitty economy forcing adults to behave like children + Vice after Vice after Vice =
If you are a shitty person and you feel it, that’s a sign all is right and just with the world. Your perceptions are completely right, you just don’t like them because you’re a brat.
God forbid Lord Fauntleroy be expected to change or do something mildly unpleasant.
Feeling bad isn’t a bad thing – if it was just deserts. That’s called guilt, remorse, shame and all sorts of other words we need to bring back. Feeling bad can’t be a punishment from God, can it, atheists? It’s funny how the Nurture people are also first to reach for the pills, although we’re all completely the same, which doesn’t stop at the neck. (Fact: depressed people aren’t actually serotonin deficient, that was a lie debunked to sell pills and the theory hasn’t died).
Atheists don’t believe they are soul-less. They must be. Psychopaths, if you look it up, like other “low empathy” defined conditions e.g. Aspergers, don’t believe they have no feelings for others. Why? Faulty perception.
If humans aren’t sacred, our life is worth nothing. We are like ants, our suffering (rape, theft, murder) is nothing to balk at. It’s natural. Nature is violent and cruel, it’s good for the environment. There is no secular morality possible, it’s an oxymoron. Only holy things have rights per se, bequeathed as part of their spiritual power e.g. holy water has the right to baptize, no other water will do. Only humans go to heaven, not dogs (they don’t need to). Morality is an objective structure (it doesn’t differ by individual; their sex, race, whatever else) and it is based on an absolute premise: there can be no good without the real existence of evil. We shun and punish evil and pursue and reward good, all societies of longevity do this or devolve into savagery. The modern amorality considers popularity and the groupthink of “consensus reality” to determine an ever-changing and propaganda-useful right (elite) and wrong (everyone under them). The Pleasure Principle belonging to Freud defined the rapist, not a good man. You were expected to grow out of the Id-only stage as a toddler.*
They need to brainwash you because mind control only works if the entire group falls for it.
A bad person feeling bad is a good thing.
A good person feeling bad is complicated. For example, more depressed countries tend to be multicultural areas, nobody dare study this.
If you want a secular example of the rights point – only a native citizen has a (God-given) right to live in a country. Rights to do are based on facts of nature, what you are. Those do not change.
*Hedonism is the sure sign of a weakened mind, always has been the #1 indicator of psychiatric dysfunction as long as pathologies have been recorded. They have no authority to lecture from.
The retardation of the brain regions involved in impulse control is the physical, undeniable reason for this.
“When presented with tempting stimuli, individuals with low self-control showed brain patterns that differed from those with high self-control. The researchers found that the prefrontal cortex (a region that controls executive functions, such as making choices) was more active in subjects with higher self-control. [DS: normal] And the ventral striatum (a region thought to process desires and rewards) showed boosted activity in those with lower self-control.” [DS: retarded, compensatory over-excitation]
Literally retarded growth.
“Many participants don’t seem the least bit embarrassed, much less ashamed. On the contrary, they speak proudly about how they’re overturning traditions and paradigms in their private lives, just as they do in the technology world they rule.”
We are living in the end times of something, no?
I SUPPORT CALEXIT.
nb They “rule” nothing, bankers do. When easy credit goes, so do the orgies.
“How could it be anything but weird and dramatic and people on the edge testing everything?” On the one hand, he said, “if you thought like everyone else, you can’t invent the future,””
Talk about false equivalence. Abnormality is not deviance.
Putting the ritual into hazing ritual.
I don’t remember the part of consent law where you need to drug unsuspecting people first. It’s in the rape law, though, very common there.
I’ll enjoy watching their collapse.
So proud they do it at night and in secret. Hmm.
“Rich men expecting casual sexual access to women is anything but a new paradigm.” This is why we haven’t gotten a decent new technology in decades. These fuckers.
Predators are common and the motives always sound the same: wah wah entitlement, the world owes me for being amazing. From the people who made social media.
Who wants to tell them that cliques always collapse? It’s ugly.
– From the people capable of having a social life that isn’t degenerate?
“In fact, these guys even have a term for the women who pursue them: founder hounders.”
It’s quite the opposite. They have to invite the women, don’t they?
“When I ask Founder X whether these men are taking advantage of women by feeding them inhibition-melting drugs at sex parties, he replies that, on the contrary, it’s women who are taking advantage of him and his tribe, preying on them for their money.”
Yes, because any rational person would see sex and cash as interchangeable.
Unless they hand the women cash after to keep quiet about being abused, I’m not buying it.
Tribe. Yes. Tribe…
Also, Founder X?
The first rule of Fuck Club…….. the second rule, if it’s your first night…..
“In their online profiles, men are all but saying, “Hello, would you like to come up to my loft and see my stock options?”’ I used to think they were smart. They take options instead of money?
This is going to be a laughriot.
“once men like this land a woman, they are quick to throw her back.”
Emotionally disturbed manwhores. Insecure attachment, impossible to please. Yes, it’s the women at fault, of course it is.
When that attention dries out, some will inevitably kill themselves. I couldn’t say the world would lose much.
The idea that a man needs to sow any wild oats is such a loser Boomer paradigm. Note how many of these males are Gen X, Gen Y is more rightly disgusted at these habits.
“The claim of being stalked by women often becomes an excuse used by some tech stars to justify their own predatory behavior.”
They chase the woman and whatever happens, including nothing, claim she was stalking him. Crazy bitches don’t get believed.
“why do I have to compromise?” These people claim to be better than you. It’s like toxic Boomer on steroids.
They honestly think they can control or keep another human being. Sad!
Leto is such a creep (PSA).
“In the Valley, this expectation is often passed off as enlightened—a contribution to the evolution of human behavior.” You are a bonobo in a hoodie. You are backward.
Truly evolved men wouldn’t need to leverage their power to screw people from work.
‘I should be able to have sex with a woman because I’m a rich guy.’ Similar to the logic of GHB druggers and date rapists. They tell themselves it’s a safe situation and the woman chooses to be a target because she’s the defective one.
“It’s way better than a swingers’ club would feel because this is at a home and you are surrounded by people you know.”
How is that not a swinger’s club, at best? Joke’s on them, your microbiome will carry those diseases and impair you later.
I’ve heard of swingers who work exactly like that, the keys in a bowl type. Their cancer rates merit study.
“They talk about diversity on one side of their mouth, but on the other side they say all of this shit.” Male feminists are the biggest misogynists going, yup. Their act goes that they can abuse a woman as much as they like and call her empowered for it.
I find it funny they use the word commitment when asylums used to take perverts. And as if there’s any such thing without faithfulness.
So self-aware they fund artificial friends, this is pathetic. You wanna be self-aware? Put down the drugs.
“we’re all cool about sex” scene.’ Cool? How old are you?
“Crawford can’t even count the number of men who’ve told her how lucky she is to have so many eligible men to date in the male-dominated tech scene.”
Interesting gaslight, fending off nascent lawsuits.
Peter Pan fuckboys hardly count as good, eligible MEN.
“the party scene is now so pervasive that women entrepreneurs say turning down invitations relegates them to the uncool-kids’ table.” Your money will last longer than theirs.
“Not doing it was a thing.” Cult says what?
Independent thinkers, heavy on the peer pressure. Aha.
“They talk business at these parties. They do business,” she said. “They decide things.”
But there’s no pressure or abuse of power.
This is part of the reason frigid is really just a way for evil men to criticize the few good women left. What else would they have?
Respect should also mean the right to turn something down and have that be respected. Consensual connotes a right of refusal.
“Over time, I realized that it’s false advertising and it’s not something women should think is a way to get ahead.” Yes, they lie. Like most predators. If they want to work with you, they will?
“If you do participate in these sex parties, don’t ever think about starting a company or having someone invest in you. Those doors get shut. But if you don’t participate, you’re shut out. You’re damned if you do, damned if you don’t.” People who sleep around are generally untrustworthy. These ‘open’ people won’t be public about it. Hmph, cowards hiding behind liberalism.
They’ll die poor so who cares?
If a person has no conscience, that applies to their working hours too.
Someone stop this man.
What is he even looking for at this point? Can he stay married or even faithful to a girlfriend? Is he gonna be one of those weird middle-aged guys constantly chasing tail like it’s their youth?
Literally could be her father.
Was statistically perfect Amber not enough?
This is why you called Creepy Musk, man.
Damn I’m done defending you.
Sorry no, curing cancer at this point would not justify his behaviour.
Watch out – Elon’s about.
We’ll know if he gives her a car. A Tesla can be traced anywhere in the world.
Lovebombing 101. Expensive gifts induce a sense of obligation.
Why do people get angry over Amber using a guy for money? But never for those guys using women for sex?
Bravo. To act like all women are hookers is indeed disgusting.
A gift is a gift, no strings. She didn’t force him and he’s a fool to expect anything in return.
He’s meant to be a big deal but I see no interview with Stefan Molyneux on the future of energy.
One hour man. You can spare one hour!
“The lessons of history would suggest that civilisations move in cycles. You can track that back quite far – the Babylonians, the Sumerians, followed by the Egyptians, the Romans, China. We’re obviously in a very upward cycle right now, and hopefully that remains the case. But it may not.”
You’re not stupid. Stefan is also a Canadian libertarian, you’re practically cousins.
“I’m personally a moderate and a registered independent, so I’m not strongly Democratic or strongly Republican.”
Yes because both are in fact cucks.
“I’m reasonably optimistic about the future, especially the future of the United States – for the century, at least.”
Are you buying it?
Update: I am about 20% taking the piss here. In the spirit of laughing at a billionaire.
I’m getting my oar in before she ruins him.
Whether it hits the public is another matter. I actually feel sorry for the guy.
Titles can’t buy you taste.