Twitter’s psychosis experiment

Big Brother is only going to ask you ONCE:

Which is the straight line?

This is why we should’ve kept the old asylums open.

https://www.simplypsychology.org/asch-conformity.html

“Asch (1951) devised what is now regarded as a classic experiment in social psychology, whereby there was an obvious answer to a line judgment task. If the participant gave an incorrect answer it would be clear that this was due to group pressure.”

Do you believe in genetics, the evolution of sexual dimorphism or equalism and conformity?

Future cult researchers will have a field day with this attempted breach of reality.

Thought Prison was right. This won’t end.

Breaking a person isn’t a big thing requiring waterboarding and chains.

It’s very subtle and small. You force them to publicly lie to themselves, to say something they know isn’t true and believe it. This miniature psychosis causes future dissonance, they’ll go on to deny things before their very eyes without intervention.

If you can get them to lie ONCE, just once, they’re yours forever.

SJWs aren’t to be mocked as stupid or pitied, they’re psyops.

https://www.simplypsychology.org/minority-influence.html

They dress like useless idiots so you under-estimate them.
If they turned up in suits, you’d know it was a conformity test.

The freak police

They won’t investigate home invasion, illegals, rape or murder.

But you like a tweet…

http://thoughtprison-pc.blogspot.com/

Is anybody safe?

Under PC, whatever you do, whatever willing you show, status is contingent.

There is no safety even for members of the ruling elite in a system of Political Correctness; anyone at all is susceptible to denunciation for any reason or no reason at any time.

Since PC is a wave of moral ‘progress’ which leaves-behind all previous moral standards and behaviours – there can be no accumulation of moral capital.

This applies to the ultra-PC just as much as to the openly reactionary.

(When they ask where their pension is, laugh).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime

The current year in summary

Imagine living in the current year and thinking Nato and the UN, EU and Co were made for our benefit.

Extraordinary.

I’ve got my eye of Sauron on Deutsche.

SOON

I’ve long predicted this but I’ll abstain from happy-dancing just yet.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/?s=deutsche

See “Racking up” especially.

Scientists can make you unlearn

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/10/181025142023.htm

No more noticing things.

Intended long-term application:
“unlearn the association”

How long until this is compulsory for badthink?

Literal brainwashing. Scrub the hatefacts away!

So…. does this apply to sexuality? No?

Can we convince socialists that it has been tried? Most notably by Uncle Adolf.

The recent history of PC censorship

http://thoughtprison-pc.blogspot.com

He also sells the book through official channels, which would be nice to buy if you like the material.

It’s also easier to read than this free version.

Contents page for a taste;

Contents (of paper version)

Why I use the term Political Correctness, instead of Liberalism or Socialism? …………………………………………………………………………i
Introduction……………………………………………………………………. iii
Political correctness no longer a joke… ………………………………… 1
Escape from habituation into nihilism …………………………………… 2
The irrationality of PC ……………………………………………………….. 7
Imaginary enemies preferred……………………………………………….. 9
Why is PC so shallow, flippant and reckless? ……………………….. 12
Political correctness, the intellectual elite and the mass media …. 15
The mass media and the memory hole …………………………………. 17
Fashion and PC ………………………………………………………………. 20
Old Left – New Left ………………………………………………………… 22
Nature of modern mass media ……………………………………………. 25
Mass media as social cognition ………………………………………….. 28
The immunity of PC to reason …………………………………………… 29
PC depends on both the mass media and an intellectual elite …… 31
The impossibility of neutrality …………………………………………… 32
The proper question – whom to favour? ………………………………. 35
Assuming neutrality is impossible ………………………………………. 37
Good causes and good intentions ……………………………………….. 39
The moral exemplar of PC ethics ……………………………………….. 41
Is anybody safe? ……………………………………………………………… 43
Safety for victim group members ……………………………………….. 46
Life as a supervised game …………………………………………………. 47
What matters most – PC or societal function? ………………………. 49
Virtue in political correctness = altruism, un-selfishness…………. 52
Disinterested altruism and moral superiority ………………………… 56
The insanity of pure abstract altruism………………………………….. 59
Immune to evidence ………………………………………………………… 61
Indifference to outcomes ………………………………………………….. 63
Takeover by the PC elite – ten summary points …………………….. 65
Not fundamentally egalitarian, after all ……………………………….. 70
The definition of happiness under PC………………………………….. 73
The Principle of Inversion ………………………………………………… 74
PC Utopia ……………………………………………………………………… 76
Atomic individuals, atomic acts …………………………………………. 77
All groups seen as interest groups ………………………………………. 78
PC-favoured groups are assumed to be weak and controllable …. 80
PC not fundamentally „multicultural‟ ………………………………….. 82
Orthodox religion is immune to PC incentives ……………………… 84
PC as a Christian heresy …………………………………………………… 86
Western civilization cannot be saved…………………………………… 89
The millennium-deep roots of political correctness ………………… 91
Could resurgent nationalism save Western civilization from PC? 94
Characteristics of a new secular nationalism ………………………… 99
Could a party of „common sense‟ replace political correctness? 103
CS v PC ………………………………………………………………………. 105
What is The Good? ………………………………………………………… 109
Political Correctness is purposefully subversive of The Good … 114
The Good versus The Better ……………………………………………. 117
Can the desire to end suffering be the primary motivation? ……. 119
The world is not enough …………………………………………………. 122
Can‟t we simply subtract PC from modernity? ……………………. 124
PC and „original sin‟ ………………………………………………………. 126
Faith in abstract systems …………………………………………………. 128
Why don‟t you convert to political correctness? ………………….. 131
How to be non-PC …………………………………………………………. 134
Postscript …………………………………………………………………….. 136
Note to the reader ………………………………………………………….. 137

I bolded the recently-relevant topics, he isn’t called paranoid now!

Oh, but this well-researched, well-written book was published before SJWAL and the guy’s actually white and really academic, with a history of contribution in academia, so don’t be surprised you somehow never heard of it among the so-called red pill / woke / alternative / whatever internet that totally isn’t controlled opposition.

Totally.

I’m sure they just forgot to mention it at the apropos moments for half a decade.

As it was all coming to fruition.

Epigraph

This book is intended for normal, mainstream, secular, modern, disaffected and alienated intellectuals; those who are complicit in political correctness (as are all intellectuals) but who are (when not distracted, drugged or dreaming) in a state of despair.

This book will, I hope, help such people to understand their condition, and present the likely choices. It will not help them to save their world (too late for that) but it may help them to save their souls.

I’m sure they just “forgot”.

You cannot understand the nature of the Beast without this book, it truly is fundamental.

Tagging as QAnon because it explains social media censorship.

A point about the Conservative cucks who want to keep the Sexual Revolution (so recent it’s in living memory).

People can only get away with this absurd claim to be defending Western Civilization (get away with it in their own minds, as much as the public arena) because Western Civilization is so obviously collapsing so fast and the perception that what will come after is probably going to be miserable for most people; and because this degeneration is being accelerated by an evil, blind and insane politically correct elite who apparently must be opposed – somehow – although with little chance of short-term success.

Blind? No, they have a giant eye.

Never attribute to stupidity what has a centuries-long trail of proof leading to malice.

What else are we supposed to believe? Year on year, it coincidentally went their way?

Trump’s victory triggers the brainwashed because in Hollywood, only the good win. If they win, they must be the good guys.

But the Secular Right is trying to keep its cake and to eat it: to retain the residual and declining bits of modernity, the counter-currents that it personally values (especially sexual freedom); but at the same time to dispense with PC – and PC is now the mainstream and dominant flow of modernity.

To kill PC in all its sprouting Hydra heads, you’d need to kill the body of what it protects.

Bye bye sexual “freedom” as the price of civility.

If you want civilization, the decadence has gotta die.

Austerity was previously Labour’s policy for a reason.

I’d like to thank Planned Parenthood for Trump’s November victory. Without their tireless work to murder leftists, this push-back wouldn’t be possible. Abortion has replaced pandemic as a culling force in human populations.

Logically the insane degenerates deluded enough to feel entitled to both a virgin and a whore (and therefore, terrible marriages as they romance the mistress and deprive the wife with emotional abandonment) would immediately cause a severe shortage of women a la India, to say nothing of the women who’d reject the system and swear off men entirely. This is why the desires of weak-willed men don’t determine history or society, they can only destroy.

100% – 20% religious, spinster, 40% virgin probable child bride, 40% whore  or if they wanted more variety, using up the best women thus 70% whore, 30% bride and slaughtering women who rejected the slavery of forced unions.How quickly before the birth rate turns into an Indian sinkhole, like all the savage groups who did this in history before?

And they try to appeal to Darwin about this? Or moral superiority? What about all the abortions required by that system?

Kindly, there’d be at least a 25% shortage of women. What happens to the men? You can’t draft them, they won’t go or they’ll rebel or be useless. Now you’re overthrown by the shit-tier of your own sex. Like India.

AKA the guys who think they’d be better off in that society, not of the shit-tier themselves, aren’t smart either.

1 man for 1 woman is the best system and natural to this species.

As it is, a mutated flu of some sort would shortly dispatch most sluts, whatever their claimed politics, in the world. It doesn’t have to be purely an STD to be transmitted through close physical proximity (although it could combine with HPV’s genes). I don’t worry about them. They’re dead men walking. And contributing to the very drug resistance that might’ve saved them. The Lord does work in mysterious ways.

Tolerant left wants to censor private conversations

The Left always become tyrannical oppressors over time, who end up mass slaughtering the people who won’t tolerate it. Lefty bigots.

Trump, when is he banning companies from getting involved in politics?

This is anti-democratic.

I told you not to talk to them. They have nobody to attack any more, nothing to fight – this makes them impotent. If you don’t cut the head off the Hydra, it can’t grow more! Avoid the control freaks (isolate them like they want – safe space?) or they will get you arrested. You can’t fix the stupid. And you’re making them stronger with your eyeballs on their twitter etc. They feed from attention and they’re starving.

She wants to ban jokes.
Seriously. Why not make it the Meme Banning Bill?

State sponsored sense of humour! When do we get a list of requirements!

Vice police of the mind!

This is anti-safe space, does tumblr know?

All the fandoms that would die?

Most fandoms are millions of people in groups online.

Hey, they arrested people for making public opinions known so people hid in DM and PMs and the like, how is this surprising? But how will they ban any forum? (members 500+)

YOU CAN’T KILL AN IDEA, LABOURITE.

They want to break up large groups so they can pick off each group and the others aren’t warned about this or tactics in good time to respond. A group of minds is essentially a supercomputer and trained on political info (e.g. Q) can uncover many things.

The sluts have the most to fear from this, because if they ban private conversations, all your flirting online will have to be public. All the girls will see all the tactics you try on the others.

This ruins freedom of association, including intimate (emotionally intimate) conversations. They’re trying to call everyone else a cult… the New Church Ladies.

It isn’t about women, that’s a straw man. They don’t like being questioned, especially journalists, anyone with bias. There shouldn’t be “protected groups”, we must be equal under the law? They’re allowed to judge us, we aren’t allowed to judge them (r-types fear The Mob).

She should fuck off and take her menopause meds instead of taking it out on us that she isn’t getting enough follows on twitter. Yeah, you can’t force people to like your message, Mz Hitler! All their signals are turning against them, because their mask is slipping….

And by banning all others rhetoric, that’s what they’re trying to do, they think they can force people back asleep.

She could start a blog but people have to be dedicated to read those and you can’t really shame people for seeking out ideas, a liberal principle. It’s freedom of speech. One reason I don’t advertise or shill. I’m not harming a fly over here so…. where’s the grounds?

Logically, she’d have to ban large social gatherings, including pubs. In London, the largest social gatherings happen in mosques….. so…. nothing will happen. Khan won’t let it.

She’s carping about online harassment, when that’s an SJW-pushed thing. Well, wouldn’t this then apply to all the SJWs who go around monstering random, normal people? Trying to ruin their lives? One rule for plebs, is it?

And you wondered why nobody wanted to vote for “I’ll make upsetting Muslims illegal!” Miliband? We know that ends in a very literal test of the phrase “sticks and stones…” or a gay club shooting. Let them all have their bloody diversity, don’t lift a finger.

She implicitly admitted she starts arguments with people then gets all triggered when they argue back? Like people? Maybe don’t get angry at everything?

You can’t win without having the debate first, you dumb cow.

You people have been politically retarded since the Blair era, they haven’t adapted for the times whatsoever and expect the rest of us to slow our roll.

You don’t have to have a twitter account. You don’t have to use the internet. Go home, old hag, you clearly hate what the internet is about. Nobody gives a shit if you’re an MP if your points suck donkey balls. Those people disagreeing were trying to help you! Become more relevant!

The internet is not for people like her, she isn’t tall enough for this ride.

Young people aren’t buying papers these days, let alone The Guardian (its readership is dead/dying, look up the data). If they had a paywall, their traffic count couldn’t justify all those journalists – and you know they wouldn’t fire all the white ones! The Guardian’s white journalists rake in the majority of their traffic because the Boomers reading it only want to read them (e.g. Toynbee).

This is Old Media (dying media) protectionism.

If politics is a “science”, they can hide data behind paywalls far, far away from the voting plebs!