Scientists can make you unlearn

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/10/181025142023.htm

No more noticing things.

Intended long-term application:
“unlearn the association”

How long until this is compulsory for badthink?

Literal brainwashing. Scrub the hatefacts away!

So…. does this apply to sexuality? No?

Can we convince socialists that it has been tried? Most notably by Uncle Adolf.

The recent history of PC censorship

http://thoughtprison-pc.blogspot.com

He also sells the book through official channels, which would be nice to buy if you like the material.

It’s also easier to read than this free version.

Contents page for a taste;

Contents (of paper version)

Why I use the term Political Correctness, instead of Liberalism or Socialism? …………………………………………………………………………i
Introduction……………………………………………………………………. iii
Political correctness no longer a joke… ………………………………… 1
Escape from habituation into nihilism …………………………………… 2
The irrationality of PC ……………………………………………………….. 7
Imaginary enemies preferred……………………………………………….. 9
Why is PC so shallow, flippant and reckless? ……………………….. 12
Political correctness, the intellectual elite and the mass media …. 15
The mass media and the memory hole …………………………………. 17
Fashion and PC ………………………………………………………………. 20
Old Left – New Left ………………………………………………………… 22
Nature of modern mass media ……………………………………………. 25
Mass media as social cognition ………………………………………….. 28
The immunity of PC to reason …………………………………………… 29
PC depends on both the mass media and an intellectual elite …… 31
The impossibility of neutrality …………………………………………… 32
The proper question – whom to favour? ………………………………. 35
Assuming neutrality is impossible ………………………………………. 37
Good causes and good intentions ……………………………………….. 39
The moral exemplar of PC ethics ……………………………………….. 41
Is anybody safe? ……………………………………………………………… 43
Safety for victim group members ……………………………………….. 46
Life as a supervised game …………………………………………………. 47
What matters most – PC or societal function? ………………………. 49
Virtue in political correctness = altruism, un-selfishness…………. 52
Disinterested altruism and moral superiority ………………………… 56
The insanity of pure abstract altruism………………………………….. 59
Immune to evidence ………………………………………………………… 61
Indifference to outcomes ………………………………………………….. 63
Takeover by the PC elite – ten summary points …………………….. 65
Not fundamentally egalitarian, after all ……………………………….. 70
The definition of happiness under PC………………………………….. 73
The Principle of Inversion ………………………………………………… 74
PC Utopia ……………………………………………………………………… 76
Atomic individuals, atomic acts …………………………………………. 77
All groups seen as interest groups ………………………………………. 78
PC-favoured groups are assumed to be weak and controllable …. 80
PC not fundamentally „multicultural‟ ………………………………….. 82
Orthodox religion is immune to PC incentives ……………………… 84
PC as a Christian heresy …………………………………………………… 86
Western civilization cannot be saved…………………………………… 89
The millennium-deep roots of political correctness ………………… 91
Could resurgent nationalism save Western civilization from PC? 94
Characteristics of a new secular nationalism ………………………… 99
Could a party of „common sense‟ replace political correctness? 103
CS v PC ………………………………………………………………………. 105
What is The Good? ………………………………………………………… 109
Political Correctness is purposefully subversive of The Good … 114
The Good versus The Better ……………………………………………. 117
Can the desire to end suffering be the primary motivation? ……. 119
The world is not enough …………………………………………………. 122
Can‟t we simply subtract PC from modernity? ……………………. 124
PC and „original sin‟ ………………………………………………………. 126
Faith in abstract systems …………………………………………………. 128
Why don‟t you convert to political correctness? ………………….. 131
How to be non-PC …………………………………………………………. 134
Postscript …………………………………………………………………….. 136
Note to the reader ………………………………………………………….. 137

I bolded the recently-relevant topics, he isn’t called paranoid now!

Oh, but this well-researched, well-written book was published before SJWAL and the guy’s actually white and really academic, with a history of contribution in academia, so don’t be surprised you somehow never heard of it among the so-called red pill / woke / alternative / whatever internet that totally isn’t controlled opposition.

Totally.

I’m sure they just forgot to mention it at the apropos moments for half a decade.

As it was all coming to fruition.

Epigraph

This book is intended for normal, mainstream, secular, modern, disaffected and alienated intellectuals; those who are complicit in political correctness (as are all intellectuals) but who are (when not distracted, drugged or dreaming) in a state of despair.

This book will, I hope, help such people to understand their condition, and present the likely choices. It will not help them to save their world (too late for that) but it may help them to save their souls.

I’m sure they just “forgot”.

You cannot understand the nature of the Beast without this book, it truly is fundamental.

Tagging as QAnon because it explains social media censorship.

A point about the Conservative cucks who want to keep the Sexual Revolution (so recent it’s in living memory).

People can only get away with this absurd claim to be defending Western Civilization (get away with it in their own minds, as much as the public arena) because Western Civilization is so obviously collapsing so fast and the perception that what will come after is probably going to be miserable for most people; and because this degeneration is being accelerated by an evil, blind and insane politically correct elite who apparently must be opposed – somehow – although with little chance of short-term success.

Blind? No, they have a giant eye.

Never attribute to stupidity what has a centuries-long trail of proof leading to malice.

What else are we supposed to believe? Year on year, it coincidentally went their way?

Trump’s victory triggers the brainwashed because in Hollywood, only the good win. If they win, they must be the good guys.

But the Secular Right is trying to keep its cake and to eat it: to retain the residual and declining bits of modernity, the counter-currents that it personally values (especially sexual freedom); but at the same time to dispense with PC – and PC is now the mainstream and dominant flow of modernity.

To kill PC in all its sprouting Hydra heads, you’d need to kill the body of what it protects.

Bye bye sexual “freedom” as the price of civility.

If you want civilization, the decadence has gotta die.

Austerity was previously Labour’s policy for a reason.

I’d like to thank Planned Parenthood for Trump’s November victory. Without their tireless work to murder leftists, this push-back wouldn’t be possible. Abortion has replaced pandemic as a culling force in human populations.

Logically the insane degenerates deluded enough to feel entitled to both a virgin and a whore (and therefore, terrible marriages as they romance the mistress and deprive the wife with emotional abandonment) would immediately cause a severe shortage of women a la India, to say nothing of the women who’d reject the system and swear off men entirely. This is why the desires of weak-willed men don’t determine history or society, they can only destroy.

100% – 20% religious, spinster, 40% virgin probable child bride, 40% whore  or if they wanted more variety, using up the best women thus 70% whore, 30% bride and slaughtering women who rejected the slavery of forced unions.How quickly before the birth rate turns into an Indian sinkhole, like all the savage groups who did this in history before?

And they try to appeal to Darwin about this? Or moral superiority? What about all the abortions required by that system?

Kindly, there’d be at least a 25% shortage of women. What happens to the men? You can’t draft them, they won’t go or they’ll rebel or be useless. Now you’re overthrown by the shit-tier of your own sex. Like India.

AKA the guys who think they’d be better off in that society, not of the shit-tier themselves, aren’t smart either.

1 man for 1 woman is the best system and natural to this species.

As it is, a mutated flu of some sort would shortly dispatch most sluts, whatever their claimed politics, in the world. It doesn’t have to be purely an STD to be transmitted through close physical proximity (although it could combine with HPV’s genes). I don’t worry about them. They’re dead men walking. And contributing to the very drug resistance that might’ve saved them. The Lord does work in mysterious ways.

Tolerant left wants to censor private conversations

The Left always become tyrannical oppressors over time, who end up mass slaughtering the people who won’t tolerate it. Lefty bigots.

Trump, when is he banning companies from getting involved in politics?

This is anti-democratic.

I told you not to talk to them. They have nobody to attack any more, nothing to fight – this makes them impotent. If you don’t cut the head off the Hydra, it can’t grow more! Avoid the control freaks (isolate them like they want – safe space?) or they will get you arrested. You can’t fix the stupid. And you’re making them stronger with your eyeballs on their twitter etc. They feed from attention and they’re starving.

She wants to ban jokes.
Seriously. Why not make it the Meme Banning Bill?

State sponsored sense of humour! When do we get a list of requirements!

Vice police of the mind!

This is anti-safe space, does tumblr know?

All the fandoms that would die?

Most fandoms are millions of people in groups online.

Hey, they arrested people for making public opinions known so people hid in DM and PMs and the like, how is this surprising? But how will they ban any forum? (members 500+)

YOU CAN’T KILL AN IDEA, LABOURITE.

They want to break up large groups so they can pick off each group and the others aren’t warned about this or tactics in good time to respond. A group of minds is essentially a supercomputer and trained on political info (e.g. Q) can uncover many things.

The sluts have the most to fear from this, because if they ban private conversations, all your flirting online will have to be public. All the girls will see all the tactics you try on the others.

This ruins freedom of association, including intimate (emotionally intimate) conversations. They’re trying to call everyone else a cult… the New Church Ladies.

It isn’t about women, that’s a straw man. They don’t like being questioned, especially journalists, anyone with bias. There shouldn’t be “protected groups”, we must be equal under the law? They’re allowed to judge us, we aren’t allowed to judge them (r-types fear The Mob).

She should fuck off and take her menopause meds instead of taking it out on us that she isn’t getting enough follows on twitter. Yeah, you can’t force people to like your message, Mz Hitler! All their signals are turning against them, because their mask is slipping….

And by banning all others rhetoric, that’s what they’re trying to do, they think they can force people back asleep.

She could start a blog but people have to be dedicated to read those and you can’t really shame people for seeking out ideas, a liberal principle. It’s freedom of speech. One reason I don’t advertise or shill. I’m not harming a fly over here so…. where’s the grounds?

Logically, she’d have to ban large social gatherings, including pubs. In London, the largest social gatherings happen in mosques….. so…. nothing will happen. Khan won’t let it.

She’s carping about online harassment, when that’s an SJW-pushed thing. Well, wouldn’t this then apply to all the SJWs who go around monstering random, normal people? Trying to ruin their lives? One rule for plebs, is it?

And you wondered why nobody wanted to vote for “I’ll make upsetting Muslims illegal!” Miliband? We know that ends in a very literal test of the phrase “sticks and stones…” or a gay club shooting. Let them all have their bloody diversity, don’t lift a finger.

She implicitly admitted she starts arguments with people then gets all triggered when they argue back? Like people? Maybe don’t get angry at everything?

You can’t win without having the debate first, you dumb cow.

You people have been politically retarded since the Blair era, they haven’t adapted for the times whatsoever and expect the rest of us to slow our roll.

You don’t have to have a twitter account. You don’t have to use the internet. Go home, old hag, you clearly hate what the internet is about. Nobody gives a shit if you’re an MP if your points suck donkey balls. Those people disagreeing were trying to help you! Become more relevant!

The internet is not for people like her, she isn’t tall enough for this ride.

Young people aren’t buying papers these days, let alone The Guardian (its readership is dead/dying, look up the data). If they had a paywall, their traffic count couldn’t justify all those journalists – and you know they wouldn’t fire all the white ones! The Guardian’s white journalists rake in the majority of their traffic because the Boomers reading it only want to read them (e.g. Toynbee).

This is Old Media (dying media) protectionism.

If politics is a “science”, they can hide data behind paywalls far, far away from the voting plebs!

Internet censorship

The Guardian’s been very quiet on this because they think it will help them. On the bright side, people won’t want to share these lefty paper links either. It’s like how killing comment boxes has made readership suffer. If you cannot share a link and engage that way, you’ll avoid that platform. They think this will only be applied to The Enemy.

No, to the anti-liberal Merkelapo, “liberals” are the enemy first.

Everyone’s a journalist now, so no, we won’t pay for your trendy opinions.

PC sermons will die because of this. It’s an Old Media KO.

Gen Y and Z value personal opinion at $0. As proof, this site may be shit, but it’s free shit.

Sometimes quite priceless shit.

The Remainers have shut up about Brexit now because “the EU isn’t tyrannical, you bigot!” won’t work!

Freedom of “movement” or speech, it seems we have to pick.

AS far as nationalism, think Streisand effect, not spiral of silence.

That’s what they’re hoping, look it up.

Saying someone can’t be patriotic in their own homeland will just out you as a traitor.

The Nick Clegg Effect? He has yet to move to Brussels.

Supranationalism is a death sentence.

They rule us without military action.

We lost a war. Or two.

They have no power… except they own “our” leaders. All of them.

They’re actually trying to ban your sense of humour. You can’t laugh at them.

Blasphemy! Political blasphemy!

Pathological science

http://www.skepticblog.org/2012/03/08/pathological-science/

“Many researchers, even hobbyists and enthusiasts, want for some one result in particular to be true. They’re always on the lookout for data that support their desired conclusion. This is not, by itself, pathological;”

actually experimenter bias is a bias

“but for some who take it to an extreme, it can become that way.”

Money, fame and tenure are on the line, what incentive?

Publish or perish threat?

Your life ruined? Family ashamed? Reputation at stake? What subconscious motive?

Many famous cases of pathological science began as legitimate science, and often the researcher would become distracted by tiny results that suggested an effect when in fact there was none. Belief supplanted objectivity, and the science became pathological science.”

While it shouldn’t be used to deter experimentation, it’s the grand reply to the phrase “established science”, an appeal to authority that doesn’t exist.

e.g.

Smells like social psychology.

Islamophobia, patriarchy (as poltergeist), systemic racism (well, if it’s the system – the evolved system – it can’t be the people in the system), creationism (not that evolution is perfect), global warming by ignore cooling data over decades etc.

Anything heavily political would be pathological science e.g.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/06/20/social-psychology-fraud/

And attitude surveys aren’t science. Seriously. You see an attitude survey, you swerve.

There’s also the problem of finding one thing but claiming another e.g. woman A makes less money than man B, but failing to control for enough other factors and still have a significant gap (above chance) to claim sexism. However, there are sexist pay gaps. Why don’t they study this? Why don’t they follow the proper method? They also apply to men in female-dominant fields too! It’s political because they’d rather lie and do bad science (hurting poor women, ironically) than let men seem like the victims for five minutes!

Pseudoscience is used by self-proclaimed “skeptics” to poison the well against the competition. Team Red will say Team Blue’s work in the same field is “pseudoscience” to boost their chances of getting the finite research grants they compete over. It’s all about the money.

So you’ll find the most successful liars comprise most “celebrity scientists”, the hallmark of scientism (personality cults develop), and when their work is eventually exposed (some Freud, Kinsey not yet, Zimbardo recently) then the world is shocked because echoes don’t pass through Ivory Tower walls. The field knew. It always knew. It hid it.

There’s no such thing as pseudoscience in the sense of a forbidden topic. Distasteful yes, but so what? Do politicians dictate freedom of thought now? No, but they sign grant checks and that’s basically the same thing.

Past a certain level, isn’t commonality of a certain unPC disposition just normal?