the r in Refugees Welcome signs + funnies

Look at the facial expression in the Bible quote. That’s an atheist going to Hell for blasphemy.

Spliced with photo of actual ‘refugees’. A picture is worth a thousand words.

Hopefully the Manchester attack, nail-bombing little girls has redpilled these feminists.
Somehow I doubt it. This is the one that started it all.

This one in particular triggers me, the way to kill it is with apathy: So?

So was Jack the Ripper, so was Hitler, so is Trump. Tired of whataboutism.

“they are us, we are them”

true

Meanwhile, actual refugees

Yeah, let’s not save these people waving round the white flag of Christendom.

Are they welcome in YOUR home? Why not?

JK Rowling has yet to take in any ‘refugees’ that someone offered to pay to fly to her homes!

She is irrelevant. Like…

Emma Watson hasn’t spent a night in the Calais camp alone, without security.

Locks are racist! No borders? No walls! Let’s all live in pagodas! 

Now a series of triggering memes and funnies.

It’s been a while. 120 funnies. Some repeats. A few serious.

about as real as her hair

Going by her Coco the Clown makeup, I think they do.

The People do not consent to open borders. The native people.

Everyone into Lord of the Rings.

All harassment is bad but sexual harassment is the worst.
It’s the First World, fucking act like it.
Recently, a German woman was beaten by a ‘migrant’, because she told him not to call her a bitch.

Tesla’s expression, my fucking sides.

He never said that but yes. Fitness is in adaptation.

Just like consciousness. You can’t touch it or test it. It’s unfalsifiable. It’s the scientific concept of spirit.
It isn’t scientific though.

Sexual orientation theory is BS. There’s only behaviour – which hole is your goal?

SJW’s playbook.

The alt-lite treats the J-word as their N.

And strange brown men on the street.

The temporary alliance of SJWs and Muslims is simple: the sexually entitled support the sexually entitled.
Also take down White Man but obviously, SJWs aren’t white or men, typically.

Advertisements

Video: The story of your enslavement

10/10 would share again. Shop around.

[read after]

Molyneux is the only redpill that hasn’t shamed himself with degeneracy.

Breath of fresh air.

The question you’re not allowed to ask:
Who are the farmers?
There is a social contract of slavery. As soon as you are born, there is a price on your head. What you’re told you owe society. It’s called national debt and ‘we’ can’t even pay the interest. It’s a con. You never agreed to it. This is why people are giving up. There is no fairness or incentive. The system is rigged via the devalued currency.
It’s the scientific model of management, Fordism. They’ll be nice to you, because it keeps you docile. They’ll tell you they care, because it means you’ll behave. They’ll promise you the world, if you work. Which is real? Only the work is real. Communists and capitalists come from largely the same stance, with inverted conclusions. The capitalist wants to be his own boss in this system. The Communist wants to be his own boss, self-employed, direct his own labour, in another system. Each believes they can maximize utility in their chosen system. Overall, there is hardly any difference in what they want – to keep what they earn. But from which State? Marxists think the State cares for them, but Marx wanted to destroy the middle-class, not the owners they are uniquely  empowered to oppose, and he never went into politics. Politicians are rich. They pay themselves above minimum wage and then flout that law to hire illegals. At least the capitalists are somewhat honest about those Homo Economicus motivations. The key difference is theft. Capitalists say enough has happened, wise to how shitty this system is but hopeful about improvement, at least for individuals who…work hard, Communists want more theft, to put the shoe on the other foot and get The Man tomorrow. Who will enforce this? The angry mob? No, they aren’t intelligent. The Man will never force measures against The Man. I alluded this in “Best Post“.

The only thing they care about is what they can take. They can’t take something you haven’t produced. This is a generational strike. Millennials (and younger) won’t get these goodies. There is no bribe, it’s fucking Monopoly money, fairground tickets for broken rides. But we’re still held responsible for governments and debts we weren’t alive to vote for. That’s illegal, it cannot be forced in either case. The system was damned long before we were born. We are not responsible. We cannot save it, nobody can ‘save’ it and they shouldn’t want to. Those people with the power to do anything are dead (they did manage to take it with them, in experiences and hedonism) or at the top of the chain, they don’t see it as a ‘problem’ to fix, a feature, not a bug. Intergenerational betrayal, and the young will live to see it.

Hey, I have been trying to warn people. I’m not alone in this. Why the maybe passive approach?
They control you with lies. It isn’t for public sector pensions, unfunded liabilities – it’s for the children! It isn’t for the whore down the road who you wouldn’t buy a drink, let alone the lifestyle of contraception, it’s for Family Planning! It isn’t for the ingrates in other countries who try to kill us, it’s for the foreign poor! Lions do not own lions because there would be a fight, eventually. We call this empire collapse. However, humans can own humans if they lie about why.

What are you working for? Which system is it, you support? Are you free to say ‘no’, openly, to your owners?

First lie: Who rules over you? Do you know? Do you know their names? Are you allowed to know?
Second lie: Who writes the textbooks? Are you taught the controversies, all moral sides or the Official Party Line? Who decides what is true for the poor, who attend state schooling?
Third lie: What is your currency? What is your value? Does money give you that? Does office paper? Gold? Food? Where is your value? External or internal? Who lies about this? Who says, in effect, ‘you need us, so you’d better behave’ or ‘toe the line, or you’ll be sorry’? Is that not a threat?
Fourth lie: Do the government do things on your behalf, in your name, without asking? Is that a democracy? Do they do the opposite from what they promised? Isn’t this… fraud? Do you even know what they’re doing? Why not tell you?
Fifth lie: Do they divide you from your kin? Isn’t this a distraction? Didn’t this start with preschool, when they told your family to abandon you (causing known psychiatric damage) to the state schooling system? Do you ‘defend’ groups you do not belong to? So… who defends you? Are you allowed to defend yourself?

It is Reverse Psychology and a fair amount of gaslighting (the true purpose of propaganda, doubt your own mind and they run it, in effect). The State tells you that you are worthless, from birth. Without you, they have nothing. They produce nothing. The state is innately parasitic.
Are you allowed or encouraged to succeed, or shamed and guilt-tripped? Isn’t this abuse? In a relationship, wouldn’t this be domestic abuse? Coming the state, isn’t that propaganda? Are you allowed ambition or achievement? Or, whatever you manage to scrape together from these seeds, do you get told ‘you didn’t build that’? Did someone else file those papers, grow those crops and study for those grades?
If they couldn’t profit from their ‘policies’, they wouldn’t push them. Who is held responsible for their failure? Those who created them and promised results (fraud) in academia? The politicians who wrote them into law? Or is the general public called the failure, since nobody is allowed to question anything else? Look to the second question.
Who has the power? The rich? Are they the same thing? What about the bribed? The workers keeping the system going? Who could improve the system? Who runs it? This relates to the first question.
Who claims to be one of you, but drags you down? Who are the crabs in the bucket making you hopeless? Calling you worthless, like the system itself?
What do they promise? What’s the alternative? ‘Bad things might happen‘ – how does that rationale differ from the Boogeyman? This is used on adults, mind.
The ‘arts’ is a good example of unofficial welfare. If you don’t want to see a play, why should you pay actors and co. for a play you’re never going to see? Why should middle-class hobbies be subsidized? Why not football matches? Why not bread and circuses? Who gets priority? Why? Which information do the arts convey to the public, how can they control the proles that the other hobbies and leisure pursuits do not?

How did this happen? Democracy is a good idea but has certain prior conditions that must be met e.g. population homogeneity, industry, longevity. When people step over the line and survive, there is no line. Find the crime without a punishment. People should have freedom, the State (a press-gang of a minority of bullies over the majority People) should never, they must be servants limited by necessity and mutual agreement. That is capitalism as an idea, some libertarianism without the globalism.

Instead, think of the ultimate minority group: the elite. Have some sympathy with the champagne socialists. Someone’s gotta crush the grapes, might as well be yours.

Denial is psychologically easier than dealing with it, they’re primed (the real subliminal effect, look it up) to be immature – less grit, lower impulse control, shorter attention spans than previous generations. We were bred to be weak by the State. Like Carlin said, just smart enough to run the machines but never to question why. We didn’t cause this mess, but this is how we live now. We must deal with it.
In a crisis, there is a normalcy bias. People will walk around as though nothing is wrong. On a societal scale, this is ongoing. There are problems, but not the problems the State feeds and funds. I repeat myself. The State is the enemy of the People, whether it be a Communist or capitalist one. If every man is equal, there can be no judges, no politicians, no lawyers, no preachers, no teachers, every man must stand alone. If every man is equal and not an animal, why need a State?

You could simplify that K-types are producers, the little red hen baking the bread and r-types the swarming locust of consumers.

I wonder what lesson that holds for Ks, when the Malthusian trap, the demographic crunch (or economic correction of all the bubbles popping at once to make ’08 look like a child’s Frozen birthday party) snaps on us. It may not happen overnight, but in politics a week is a year. A few years this would take for the shit to trickle down, a few months tops.

The r-selected need a State because it steals the wealth they cannot, as it steals the wealth they cannot produce themselves. The K-selected, dwindling in number with a small, short boost recently, do not need a State. They use the State to connect with each other. That already existed in ancient times, the tribal business.

What is control, in these contexts? Who is controlling you?

Economics works by quintiles, and taxes from this (aka Who is rich?). If you wanna go the typical way, sure, ask WHO is the 1% and what do they have in common? But realistically, they maintain power as the 20%.

The people screeching about the 1% are doing damage control as false opposition. To have a platform in the first place, to have the MSM’s ear, they are the privileged 20%.

I posted this at the beginning of the year.

Good luck. We’re all going to need it. If you’ve read this far, I sincerely wish you well.

War on sugar now war on chocolate by Big Brother

Can we kill the Nanny of the State already?
The politicians who push these laws through and the teachers who search kid’s bags for sweets like they’re guns (illegal but happens) are ALL lard-arses.

Chocolate bars ‘to shrink by 20%’ in bid to tackle child obesity

fine, I won’t buy those bars, neither will anyone else

adults have the money and won’t buy supposed child portions

communists can’t do market forces
nothing to do with currency devaluation, to pay for the newcomers, I’m sure
war on chocolate, never a war on alcohol, which contains the most natural sugar and empty calories without any balancing ingredients
name and shame companies providing what is promised? trading standards anyone?
ooh some cuck penpusher is mad at you, better run and hide those profits because they can smell money and it makes them angry
irony is working class children used to gorge thousands of calories in chocolate during the industrial revolution, to have the energy from the cheap chocolate to work; it’s actually antibiotics, GFS and carbs like bread making them fat

omg shut up stupid dumb idiots argh ahhhh hiddleston facepalm deep blue sea

Use it as marketing, proud to rebel against our insane and FAT civil servants.

authoritynutrition.com

coffee and tea are worse for you
Fuck, why not go back to rations?

wait that would include champagne you socialist scum

If it’s about the sugar, ban it in restaurants, especially fast food – but noooooo they won’t do that. Ban butter too, processed bread and so on.
That would affect them.

Link: Plausible reasons behind Trump’s success

Plausible reasons behind Trump’s success
http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-reasons-trumps-rise-that-no-one-talks-about/

To those ignored, suffering people, Donald Trump is a brick chucked through the window of the elites. “Are you assholes listening now?”

Class Revolution.

What all those socialists in ivory towers WANTED.

Yes it’s a response to classism, an orderly protest and what happened? These people are so spoiled, they caused public damage. It isn’t coming out of Democrat’s taxes because they don’t pay any! You really think RDJ payed full tax on his billions? The welfare family looting together, shooting together?

These people were anti-white, virulently, so the natural reaction to this, equal and opposite, was to vote in the whitest guy they could find.

It’s also a response to racism, true. What a lot of people don’t know is that class is the polite term for the genetic caste system of proper marriage. Take the blue-bloods of Europe.

Hey, if you wanna understand any revolution, look at the French. The rich die, the poor win. This is a death of relevance and they should be thanking the proles’ mercy. This is gonna escalate because they don’t get it, these people have the power. They are the ones that mean those Hollywood celebrities get that big paycheck, they grow the food and work in the factories and protect the country. They are your bodyguards. Your police, your army, your admin.

In the immortal words of Fight Club:

Do not fuck with us.

The mobilization of this force without a word of consensus has shit up the Emperors wearing no clothes. A sense of injustice and personal slight. Nobody asked what was triggering to the majority. Their impotence is visible for all to see. They never had power, it was an illusion gifted by all those working hard beneath them. What was it Romney said? 47% of parasites, wasn’t it? Say, in a democracy, that’s a mighty fine number.

The rest have been patiently listening as they got in from overtime.

They’ve been degraded and told to hate themselves, their children and to love their would-be murderers, rapists and thieves.

Reminds me of a song

fuck you I won’t do what you tell me

If they were the Joker, they’d be burning that pile of Clinton cash right about now.

It isn’t about the money. It’s about sending a message.

If this is ignored or worse, further doubled-down like typical SJW short-sightedness, other measures will become necessary and they’ll like those even less.

Identity politics say to love everything except your class and country.
We noticed. We’re upset.

Begs the Q. You can tell millions of Americans are thinking…

Then what the (beep) are you doing with our money?

Update: I read his other article, some thoughts.

Why should we help the outgroup?

Every SJW asks that we waste OUR finite precious life on THEIR emotional fulfillment. Why?
They act like they can’t do it alone. Why need us? Why force us by various intrusive laws?

Why is there no logical reason to stand up for that question?

There are two types of poor, remember. For a modern example on another topic, Cindy who got hooked on coke at parties isn’t the same as a crack baby that had no choice. You are responsible for YOURSELF and your ACTIONS. That is individual agency. The system isn’t supported to support personal failure. You were raised with Don’t, you were warned, you were told and it wasn’t personal or trivial, it’s because a society is built on resistance to the entropy of social and cultural degeneration caused by those individual actions in large numbers. In short, no, it’s not about you. The civic is good for everyone, literally. If you think it’s hard to follow the rules, it’s harder to live in a society which has rejected them. Your reward for stupidity is the consequence. Other adults are not here to bail you out. We’re your peers, you are our equal, you said.

Why should we help the outgroup?

History shows it doesn’t work, it leads to blame and war. Ingrates ruin everything. They destroy what they could’ve never built, see post-apartheid Africa, if you can peer through the smoke of that smoldering crater. The people who complain about the problem e.g. ghettos, are the people making the problem. It’s them. It’s the same demographic of people. The people living in Saudi Arabia make it a sexist shithole. The bad teachers make the bad schools. There is some kind of genetic determinism in this. HBD shows a consistency of personal success over many generations. Why? What are we supposed to do about what all the social engineering has failed? How is another group supposed to discriminate against part of a group (the problem) without the rest acting on ingroup loyalties? Stereotypes, again. Based on reality and human nature, which is timeless as it is irrational bullshit.
Look at what a person looks down on. They’re the opposite. They hate the poor? They’re rich. They hate the straight? They hate the successful? They hate the white? (Culturally, they’re probably not white).
Society’s standards are not a bad thing, either. That’s the secret to your progress – higher standards, not lowering the standard hoping that eventually, there’ll be no losers in a zero-sum game (who gets that house, promotion, partner, dollar). Meritocracy isn’t a promise of equality, it’s a promise of a chance at the hard work to become successful. You’re given a position in the race, not the medal. Some would fail even in a competition with themselves. I know the canned reply “You don’t know what you’re saying” typical gaslighting used to dismiss the range of points. “You mean my point, not your point.” Also gaslighting, red herring, derailing etc. We are not the same person and your views, moral outgroup, do not match mine. Having successful ancestors isn’t a crime, you should be shaming the people who have centuries of charity money chucked at them and still haven’t stopped raping little girls. In fact, those toxic memes are now spreading to the west with multiculturalism, which causes the low trust where nobody wants to help the outgroup anymore. It’s a feature, not a bug, a self-correction. Look at the consequences of a society that lived by their principles, it amazes me how many atheists want funerals. Why do dead bodies have rights in a secular society? Aren’t they just a clump of cells?
It’s easy to think we’re all equals when all your friends are the same. You don’t socialize with people who’d kill you for trying.
Dependents are not equals.

Conservatives are liberals mugged by reality

http://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/readers-comment-a-conservative-is-a-liberal-who-has-been-mugged-by-reality/

It’s class warfare, they’re keeping the lower class down and have been punishing us with drains since the proles dared vote Thatcher in. “Rubbing the Right’s nose in diversity” – they meant the Thatcher voters who worked in factories.

amused smoking lol haha watching with anticipation

Social Justice is a big ruse to cover for classism.

Remind them of this and it’s 10/10 triggering. I’ve had them screaming CLASS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. On a loop, when I hadn’t said anything.

Simply escalate the amygdala hijack and say, “I agree, it’s a weapon against the poor.”

They ragequit. Narcissistic ragequit.