Social Justice liberal rapists

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/calais-jungle-volunteers-sex-refugees-allegations-facebook-care4calais-a7312066.html

I wanted to write that combination of words, it isn’t far off.

Everything’s conditional on their feelings, remember.

That’s the reason they tacitly allow rape of minors and women – they’re hardly blemish free, sexually.

Remember, coercion vitiates consent. I doubt you could be more coercive than threatening someone’s safety, food supply and future. I suppose the French aren’t exotic enough for these sex tourists. All sex tourists are creeps, even SWPLy white women.

I knew it I'm surrounded by assholes

Not a peep from feminists but at least the SJW rag Independent is covering it.

Reminds me of the SWP rape scandal.

They signal so hard – out of repressed or socially conditioned guilt.

R-types hate other r-types, but they’ll happily exploit, ruin and rape one another. Honestly, they assume we’re like them and we’d do the same in that situation, like Rotherham, allowing them to sleep like babies, although this is the ‘refugee’ version and not supported direct by taxpayers, police, hospitals or Government. No conscience as we’d know it, an inner compass, they take direction in the form of signalling. More extreme r-types are ironically despised by the less extreme and personally this has been going on since the beginning, why else move children preferentially? It isn’t just rape (mostly), but child rape, and many of the campers prefer fresh meat, one in the story even took one home like a cabana boy, after shopping around with her vagina. This behaviour isn’t acceptable in anyone held to a First World standard, I don’t care what colour or sex or sexuality they are, where’s the human dignity? Although the hooker thing is unsurprising, given Slut Parades, fat celebration, STD positivity etc. Words that should never be combined except in parody. Still, they use their own bad behaviour as proof everyone involved should be rewarded with more free stuff. No wonder the military age men think when they arrive that white women are whores, seriously. I saw one fake-grieving on the BBC today that his wife and child drowned – he looked as if he’d done it, no trace of remorse. What’s the bet he pushed them over to save himself, as ‘Asian’ men with a name starting M don’t value us, about the same as cattle, and now coincidentally he’s free to pursue the white meat. I’d like to polygraph that slime.

Those greeters on the news should be forced to sleep there for a week and report back on how peaceful these people are in reality, did you see what they did to pretty-boy Jude Law in spite of his heavies?

They keep saying “largest economy on the planet” or “largest economy in Europe” – the people who just turned up are entitled to precisely Jack shit.

Actually, no, less than the rest of us, who built these economies and continue to contribute to them.

I would like to enforce my “freedom of movement” to enter and exit Ford Knox, freely. I’m amazed the supposed anti-racists got away with calling it a Jungle, tbh.

thatsjustsickewwtfgrossno

Minor jab: the Slut Parades are especially funny when you realize they’re trying to out-attention gay men. More like a Fag Hag Swag.

And hey, who do you think tipped them off about an online spat?

wink zooey

Link: Why re-colonization?

http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/why-re-colonization-commonweal.html

I disagree.

For very simple reasons.

  1. cleaning up the mess they made will be expensive enough.
  2. we need to encourage our traitors to go abroad and helping the huddled masses would be a useful carrot, odds are they won’t return, with any luck
  3. we owe them nothing, charity begins at home and should be expended on those who deserved it (i.e. same culture and values, pay into our tax system or their ancestors did)
  4. it will be too expensive to help them and being foreign we won’t know where to meddle and meddling is still bad
  5. they already hate us (rapey NGOs do not assist in this reputation)
  6. they always will (resentment)
  7. they will drag us down, poverty will never be solved as stupid people with high time preference will always exist, it’s an impossible fantasy utopia never proven
  8. any money we (politicians calling charity while spending other people’s money) ‘give’ to them will be less toward our domestic plights, infrastructure and food from our children’s mouths
  9. we don’t have enough money, in debt as is, our grandchildren will struggle to pay current levels off
  10. they deserve to sink or swim on their own merits, and HBD suggest most of them will sink because we aren’t magicians, so be a utilitarian about it and don’t drag out their suffering for your own ego, that’s cruel. Give them the space and endogenous incentive (no magical white man is coming to help us!) to do it themselves. We had to develop too, in our history and those are the requirements.

Key among these:

we owe them nothing.

Quit with the programmed guilt already.

NOTHING.

Do they owe us?

They’d cut us from a life raft and laugh. Or take the active route and drown us like the Muslims did to the Christians on the way to Greece. These are not civilized peoples. THAT IS THE ENTIRE PROBLEM.

They manipulate our emotions to extract money. That’s called a con artist. The women claim they don’t know they’re supposed to breast-feed their babies (no, that’s an instinct and even the baby crawls to the breast on the mother’s chest) to excuse how frail and sickly they look, to hold them up for the cameras and beg for money (begging is illegal here unless it’s on TV) meanwhile the whore is wearing clean, brightly coloured handmade silk clothes, ironed and smooth, with good hygiene, gold earrings and quite fat herself. They claim they can’t use contraception when obviously they want White Guilt to fund their entire family and we’re stupid enough to fall for it after 100 years of foreign welfare to Africa – during which time, they got a million times worse.

are you kidding me rn seriously wtf da vincis demons

Killing the white people? Still not enough to convince us. They think we’re marks.

We are genteel by genetics. As they try to ape our culture, they will pull it down like the door in Titanic. There’s only room for one. They bring with them the depressive mutation load that kills civilizations. 

Even within a chaotic place like India, they have a caste system to prevent intermarrying with the criminal and dense classes.

In this, cultural differences matter more than sex, sexuality or religion. You cannot convert them, Magic Dirt only works on Dracula. They want to take all the freebies while we ask nothing of them, they will never fight to defend us and they’ll riot then depart once they’ve robbed us blind. They are cultural locusts. 

Saving the world is impossible and probably involves mass-murdering the corrupt/bad/stupid people causing all the problems. The solution may not be ‘nice’ as Hollywood promised.

Colonialism never died, we still control the Third World by the purse strings except now we call it foreign aid. 

Link: Charity encourages stupidity

By bailing them out.
And no element of mathematics, economics or psychology could dispute that. Really, try to find something. This is game theory (zero-sum, there are winners with resources and losers without) and that topic is a bastard that hangs you by your Golden Rule appeals. Point to one successful surviving nation that follows it. One. Contrary to Western marketing, Buddhists are vicious warriors. These people can set themselves on fire.

Cost/benefit assessments take into account the presence of safety nets, the fail-safes, the conditionals and Plan Bs. Bad people knowingly harm others to help themselves (drains, parasites, toxic scum). Churches didn’t just provide charity, alms, they provided selective charity by distinguishing between the deserving poor (they got into that mess by choice) and undeserving poor (victim of circumstance). It was “Go forth and sin no more”, a single chance, not “Go forth and try not to fuck up again, even though I’m such a doormat I’ll bail you out”. Turning the other cheek had sweet FA to do with cash. And this single option of salvation was coming from JESUS. If you think you’re more pious and a better Christian (signalling!) than Jesus of Nazareth himself, nobody can talk sense into you.

For the math/economics, here’s the ever-radiant;

http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/how-charity-destroys-price-discoveryand.html

“Understand that bar charities for cancer, disease, etc., the vast majority of charity is simply bailing out stupid, irresponsible people from their stupid, irresponsible decisions.”

This all stems from guilt.

Anyone trying to guilt you into believing you owe them for being born is psycho.

You can’t be a victim of your own choices. It’s impossible.

Charity should be a private choice. For classy people, we’ve always kept it anonymous (the Bible passage about trumpets springs to mind). I know I’m not the only person raised with this solid advice and I actually try to use proxies to help others, intermediaries in-person. This has the additional benefit of preventing the recipient from seeking you out if they screw up again. It’s funny how nobody on the Left ever mentions consent in those discussions on charity work, but they accept theft is illegal…

Kevin-Hart-Really-o rlly lies

UPDATE: There are opposing definitions of deserving poor vs. undeserving.
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/the-deserving-poor
But logically the grammar of the definition I gave [person, poor, manner, deserving of] and read historically makes more sense.
We did have Elizabethan and Victorian laws that made the distinction.

Cultural separation is a means of racial segregation

if you think about it.

Thought experiment, what would happen?

Indians can’t play us at cricket.

Americans have to give us back our apple pie.

Computer technology must be removed from the Middle East (that’s a good one) and water purification technologies from MENA too.

So much was invented in Europe that the rest of the world would fall into chaos if we pulled it back. They’re barely ticking along as is.

Can you imagine if we repatriated Chinese factory machines to Britain, home of the Industrial Revolution?

Black women can’t buy blonde hair dye or blue contact lenses or skin lightening cream. Whiteface, hair and eyes is racist.
White women can’t buy fake tan or butt implants.
No foreign food restaurants. Wasn’t that a main draw of multiculturalism?

What about sex-based culture? Women cannot be tomboys, men cannot be effete.

All that Western grown food? Stays in the West. Agriculture is also a form of technology.

The Internet? Britain only please.

Fashion becomes historical and tied to your capital city. London will be fine. Paris will be fine. Milan possibly. The rest of the world? Draped rags it is.

It would reverse the damage wrought by globalization. I’m all for it.

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2015/11/this-obsession-with-cultural-appropriation-is-leading-us-down-a-very-dark-path/

SJWs will destroy anything, even their own ideas given long enough. Logic is not their forte. They are purely destructive wherever they stand. Change gives them a feeling of usefulness and bad change something to complain about, lobby over, virtue signal and rentseeking with taxpayer funds. Poverty is still a problem, isn’t it? Even in Africa, and how much money has been spent in total, since the Victorian era?

Link: The parable of the good cuckservative

As the Good Book said: “For also when we were with you, this we declared to you: that, if any man will not work, neither let him eat.”

“For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become accountable for all of it.”

http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/the-parable-of-good-cuckservatan.html

The best thing about virtue signalling is that it attempts to curry favours in-group.

In this case, by betraying the in-group and clambering atop their moral high ass.

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

“What’s that belt for?”

Other funny quotes

“And he shall not acquire many wives for himself, lest his heart turn away, nor shall he acquire for himself excessive silver and gold.”

‘Therefore thus says the Lord God: “An adversary shall surround the land and bring down your defenses from you, and your strongholds shall be plundered.”’

“You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his male servant, or his female servant, or his ox, or his donkey, or anything that is your neighbor’s.”

The oft-misquoted: “You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the Lord.”

“If a thief is found breaking in and is struck so that he dies, there shall be no bloodguilt for him, but if the sun has risen on him, there shall be bloodguilt for him. He shall surely pay. If he has nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft.”

“But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.”

“For he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer.”

‘Jesus said to him, “Again it is written, ‘You shall not put the Lord your God to the test.’”’

“Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry.”

“Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous.”