Does foreign aid to Africa make them worse?

ABSTRACT Contemporary Africa is not taking its place in the 21st century globalised world. Being highly inflicted with extreme poverty, Africa has reached out for help from the developed countries of the world. Since independence, there are so many instrumental measures being put to place to tackle the problem of development in Africa. These are modernisation, socialism, globalization and, very crucial to this discourse, foreign aid. This paper discusses the efficiency of foreign aid is assuring development to Africa. One of the basic assumptions of foreign aid to Africa is to alleviate extreme poverty from African soil. Now, the fundamental question is: Is foreign aid really a catholicon to Africans catastrophe? Or is foreign aid a Hodgkin’s disease to Africa’s development? Most of these attempts, that have addressed Africa’s problem of development, have ignored, or glossed over, this fundamental factor; namely, bootphilosohy/self-reliance. This perspective, in my view, offers more fundamental and comprehensive explanations of the problem of development in Africa. Especially, it tries to explain how the present political, social, and economic problems in Africa are connected to foreign aid. Therefore, this paper challenges the assumptions of foreign aid as inadequate in tackling poverty in Africa. This paper argues that aid to Africa is a chimera in sheep clothing. Aid is one of the contributors of poverty and underdevelopment in Africa. Using the philosophical tool of criticism, this paper exposes the underdevelopment of Africa with foreign aid. 

What an intelligent woman. I think I’ve posted this type of article before though. The pathological altruism extends from a ‘problematic’ god complex in whites over black people called white messiah. Stop deadbeating your own kids first, eh, America?

I take umbrage at calling socialism a development tool but whatever. I guess.

nb The NGOs like learned helplessness, plenty of cheap workers to exploit. Socialism is a bailout of companies from paying more even lefty youtubers agree. You also need to halt and reverse immigration from Africa to Europe for Africa’s sake e.g. brain drain. Companies get extra money for hiring someone cheaper, on threat of deportation, and they get kickbacks for diversity, literally, they’re pro-money.

The Chinese lately like to bribe slaves with bread and circuses, despite, say, widespread Ugandan rape. Slave owners always pretend you’re better off, trafficking charities call it The Game.

A worthy cause

Recently, a hobby of mine has been detecting which charities are worthy and which are… dodgy.

It really highlights the cultural equality myth when you look.

Key example nobody in the West is allowed to discuss:

“Each year in Asia, millions of dogs are snatched from the streets or stolen from their homes to be tortured and slaughtered for their meat. In South Korea, dogs are bred for consumption in shocking conditions on so-called “dog meat farms”. These dogs spend their entire lives in cages and are then killed in some of the most horrific ways possible.”


So cultured. So loving. So gentle.

Asiaphiles need to educate themselves. They have many cruel practices, they know they are and enjoy them, actively enjoy them.

“The methods employed to kill these innocent dogs are unspeakably vicious. Dogs are routinely blow-torched or flung into vats of boiling water while still alive. They are clubbed or stabbed to death in front of other dogs, as it is believed the sheer terror the dog endures releases adrenaline making the meat taste better.
The dogs rescued by brave and passionate volunteers are usually so badly injured that many don’t survive. But some of them do.”

They help cats too but demand is mostly for dogs.

If you’re flying in one of their areas, they need flight volunteers too.

And now they cry!

“And now, they find their Day is over! their power gone! and the throne of this nation possessed by a Royal, English, true, and ever constant member of, and friend to, the Church of England! Now, they find that they are in danger of the Church of England’s just resentments! Now, they cry out, “Peace!” “Union!” “Forbearance!” and “Charity!”: as if the Church had not too long harboured her enemies under her wing! and nourished the viperous blood, till they hiss and fly in the face of the Mother that cherished them!”

No Gentlemen, the Time of Mercy is past, your Day of Grace is over, you should have practised Peace, and Moderation, and Charity, if you expected any yourselves.


British Literature 1640-1789: An Anthology, pp. 370.

I meditate on this whenever an enemy of progress gets too big for their boots and feigns umbrage, especially the Muslims. Especially the Muslims.

The author in particular is Defoe.

Kipling: White Man’s Burden

TAKE up the White Man’s burden –
Send forth the best ye breed –
Go bind your sons to exile
To serve your captives’ need;
To wait in heavy harness
On fluttered folk and wild –
Your new-caught sullen peoples,
Half devil and half child.

Take up the White Man’s burden –
In patience to abide
To veil the threat of terror
And check the show of pride;
By open speech and simple,
An hundred times made plain,
To seek another’s profit,
And work another’s gain.

Take up the White Man’s burden –
The savage wars of peace –
Fill full the mouth of famine
And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest
The end for others sought,
Watch Sloth and heathen Folly
Bring all your hopes to nought.

Take up the White Man’s burden –
No tawdry rule of kings,
But toil of serf and sweeper –
The tale of common things.
The ports ye shall not enter,
The roads ye shall not tread,
Go make them with your living,
And mark them with your dead !

Take up the White Man’s burden –
And reap his old reward,
The blame of those ye better,
The hate of those ye guard –
The cry of hosts ye humour
(Ah slowly !) towards the light:-
“Why brought ye us from bondage,
“Our loved Egyptian night ?”

Take up the White Man’s burden –
Ye dare not stoop to less –
Nor call too loud on Freedom
To cloak your weariness;
By all ye cry or whisper,
By all ye leave or do,
The silent sullen peoples
Shall weigh your Gods and you.

Take up the White Man’s burden –
Have done with childish days –
The lightly proffered laurel,
The easy, ungrudged praise.
Comes now, to search your manhood
Through all the thankless years,
Cold-edged with dear-bought wisdom,
The judgement of your peers.

A key question of anthropology and psychology is When did we become human?

Cross-cultural studies show plainly, many of us are not there yet.

Even in the West.

Pity has killed the white man, the stupidity of taking slaves and allowing the conquered to survive, breed with food and other resources they couldn’t earn themselves. The weakness of being uncomfortable with natural law. If you let the conquered have a seat at the feast, they succeed, they have won. Mercy is the absence of punishment, not reward. White men have a profound weakness for the outgroup and this is pathological altruism. The world is not your family, they are your enemy.

The aid workers will be spat on in future, even ignoring the rape scandals. They took from their own people, things they did not earn and gave them to our enemies (traitors). To make them strong, so they can swarm us. They do not love us, they cannot love the outgroup, they hate and resent us like a brat. Sensing this hatred is common sense but impolite to mention.

God, Nature made them that way because they need to evolve. Do not spoonfeed adults. Stupidity is the capital crime of nature, mind.

Each culture earns its place.

Nobody gets to cut the line.

The Third World will starve – due to First World hubris.

Social Justice liberal rapists

I wanted to write that combination of words, it isn’t far off.

Everything’s conditional on their feelings, remember.

That’s the reason they tacitly allow rape of minors and women – they’re hardly blemish free, sexually.

Remember, coercion vitiates consent. I doubt you could be more coercive than threatening someone’s safety, food supply and future. I suppose the French aren’t exotic enough for these sex tourists. All sex tourists are creeps, even SWPLy white women.

I knew it I'm surrounded by assholes

Not a peep from feminists but at least the SJW rag Independent is covering it.

Reminds me of the SWP rape scandal.

They signal so hard – out of repressed or socially conditioned guilt.

R-types hate other r-types, but they’ll happily exploit, ruin and rape one another. Honestly, they assume we’re like them and we’d do the same in that situation, like Rotherham, allowing them to sleep like babies, although this is the ‘refugee’ version and not supported direct by taxpayers, police, hospitals or Government. No conscience as we’d know it, an inner compass, they take direction in the form of signalling. More extreme r-types are ironically despised by the less extreme and personally this has been going on since the beginning, why else move children preferentially? It isn’t just rape (mostly), but child rape, and many of the campers prefer fresh meat, one in the story even took one home like a cabana boy, after shopping around with her vagina. This behaviour isn’t acceptable in anyone held to a First World standard, I don’t care what colour or sex or sexuality they are, where’s the human dignity? Although the hooker thing is unsurprising, given Slut Parades, fat celebration, STD positivity etc. Words that should never be combined except in parody. Still, they use their own bad behaviour as proof everyone involved should be rewarded with more free stuff. No wonder the military age men think when they arrive that white women are whores, seriously. I saw one fake-grieving on the BBC today that his wife and child drowned – he looked as if he’d done it, no trace of remorse. What’s the bet he pushed them over to save himself, as ‘Asian’ men with a name starting M don’t value us, about the same as cattle, and now coincidentally he’s free to pursue the white meat. I’d like to polygraph that slime.

Those greeters on the news should be forced to sleep there for a week and report back on how peaceful these people are in reality, did you see what they did to pretty-boy Jude Law in spite of his heavies?

They keep saying “largest economy on the planet” or “largest economy in Europe” – the people who just turned up are entitled to precisely Jack shit.

Actually, no, less than the rest of us, who built these economies and continue to contribute to them.

I would like to enforce my “freedom of movement” to enter and exit Ford Knox, freely. I’m amazed the supposed anti-racists got away with calling it a Jungle, tbh.


Minor jab: the Slut Parades are especially funny when you realize they’re trying to out-attention gay men. More like a Fag Hag Swag.

And hey, who do you think tipped them off about an online spat?

wink zooey

Link: Why re-colonization?

I disagree.

For very simple reasons.

  1. cleaning up the mess they made will be expensive enough.
  2. we need to encourage our traitors to go abroad and helping the huddled masses would be a useful carrot, odds are they won’t return, with any luck
  3. we owe them nothing, charity begins at home and should be expended on those who deserved it (i.e. same culture and values, pay into our tax system or their ancestors did)
  4. it will be too expensive to help them and being foreign we won’t know where to meddle and meddling is still bad
  5. they already hate us (rapey NGOs do not assist in this reputation)
  6. they always will (resentment)
  7. they will drag us down, poverty will never be solved as stupid people with high time preference will always exist, it’s an impossible fantasy utopia never proven
  8. any money we (politicians calling charity while spending other people’s money) ‘give’ to them will be less toward our domestic plights, infrastructure and food from our children’s mouths
  9. we don’t have enough money, in debt as is, our grandchildren will struggle to pay current levels off
  10. they deserve to sink or swim on their own merits, and HBD suggest most of them will sink because we aren’t magicians, so be a utilitarian about it and don’t drag out their suffering for your own ego, that’s cruel. Give them the space and endogenous incentive (no magical white man is coming to help us!) to do it themselves. We had to develop too, in our history and those are the requirements.

Key among these:

we owe them nothing.

Quit with the programmed guilt already.


Do they owe us?

They’d cut us from a life raft and laugh. Or take the active route and drown us like the Muslims did to the Christians on the way to Greece. These are not civilized peoples. THAT IS THE ENTIRE PROBLEM.

They manipulate our emotions to extract money. That’s called a con artist. The women claim they don’t know they’re supposed to breast-feed their babies (no, that’s an instinct and even the baby crawls to the breast on the mother’s chest) to excuse how frail and sickly they look, to hold them up for the cameras and beg for money (begging is illegal here unless it’s on TV) meanwhile the whore is wearing clean, brightly coloured handmade silk clothes, ironed and smooth, with good hygiene, gold earrings and quite fat herself. They claim they can’t use contraception when obviously they want White Guilt to fund their entire family and we’re stupid enough to fall for it after 100 years of foreign welfare to Africa – during which time, they got a million times worse.

are you kidding me rn seriously wtf da vincis demons

Killing the white people? Still not enough to convince us. They think we’re marks.

We are genteel by genetics. As they try to ape our culture, they will pull it down like the door in Titanic. There’s only room for one. They bring with them the depressive mutation load that kills civilizations. 

Even within a chaotic place like India, they have a caste system to prevent intermarrying with the criminal and dense classes.

In this, cultural differences matter more than sex, sexuality or religion. You cannot convert them, Magic Dirt only works on Dracula. They want to take all the freebies while we ask nothing of them, they will never fight to defend us and they’ll riot then depart once they’ve robbed us blind. They are cultural locusts. 

Saving the world is impossible and probably involves mass-murdering the corrupt/bad/stupid people causing all the problems. The solution may not be ‘nice’ as Hollywood promised.

Colonialism never died, we still control the Third World by the purse strings except now we call it foreign aid. 

Link: Charity encourages stupidity

By bailing them out.
And no element of mathematics, economics or psychology could dispute that. Really, try to find something. This is game theory (zero-sum, there are winners with resources and losers without) and that topic is a bastard that hangs you by your Golden Rule appeals. Point to one successful surviving nation that follows it. One. Contrary to Western marketing, Buddhists are vicious warriors. These people can set themselves on fire.

Cost/benefit assessments take into account the presence of safety nets, the fail-safes, the conditionals and Plan Bs. Bad people knowingly harm others to help themselves (drains, parasites, toxic scum). Churches didn’t just provide charity, alms, they provided selective charity by distinguishing between the deserving poor (they got into that mess by choice) and undeserving poor (victim of circumstance). It was “Go forth and sin no more”, a single chance, not “Go forth and try not to fuck up again, even though I’m such a doormat I’ll bail you out”. Turning the other cheek had sweet FA to do with cash. And this single option of salvation was coming from JESUS. If you think you’re more pious and a better Christian (signalling!) than Jesus of Nazareth himself, nobody can talk sense into you.

For the math/economics, here’s the ever-radiant;

“Understand that bar charities for cancer, disease, etc., the vast majority of charity is simply bailing out stupid, irresponsible people from their stupid, irresponsible decisions.”

This all stems from guilt.

Anyone trying to guilt you into believing you owe them for being born is psycho.

You can’t be a victim of your own choices. It’s impossible.

Charity should be a private choice. For classy people, we’ve always kept it anonymous (the Bible passage about trumpets springs to mind). I know I’m not the only person raised with this solid advice and I actually try to use proxies to help others, intermediaries in-person. This has the additional benefit of preventing the recipient from seeking you out if they screw up again. It’s funny how nobody on the Left ever mentions consent in those discussions on charity work, but they accept theft is illegal…

Kevin-Hart-Really-o rlly lies

UPDATE: There are opposing definitions of deserving poor vs. undeserving.
But logically the grammar of the definition I gave [person, poor, manner, deserving of] and read historically makes more sense.
We did have Elizabethan and Victorian laws that made the distinction.

Cultural separation is a means of racial segregation

if you think about it.

Thought experiment, what would happen?

Indians can’t play us at cricket.

Americans have to give us back our apple pie.

Computer technology must be removed from the Middle East (that’s a good one) and water purification technologies from MENA too.

So much was invented in Europe that the rest of the world would fall into chaos if we pulled it back. They’re barely ticking along as is.

Can you imagine if we repatriated Chinese factory machines to Britain, home of the Industrial Revolution?

Black women can’t buy blonde hair dye or blue contact lenses or skin lightening cream. Whiteface, hair and eyes is racist.
White women can’t buy fake tan or butt implants.
No foreign food restaurants. Wasn’t that a main draw of multiculturalism?

What about sex-based culture? Women cannot be tomboys, men cannot be effete.

All that Western grown food? Stays in the West. Agriculture is also a form of technology.

The Internet? Britain only please.

Fashion becomes historical and tied to your capital city. London will be fine. Paris will be fine. Milan possibly. The rest of the world? Draped rags it is.

It would reverse the damage wrought by globalization. I’m all for it.

SJWs will destroy anything, even their own ideas given long enough. Logic is not their forte. They are purely destructive wherever they stand. Change gives them a feeling of usefulness and bad change something to complain about, lobby over, virtue signal and rentseeking with taxpayer funds. Poverty is still a problem, isn’t it? Even in Africa, and how much money has been spent in total, since the Victorian era?