Female fertility doesn’t encourage cheating

Moving on to correct an old, old error. I’m sick of seeing it. I went out of my way to find the citation to do this.

There’s one study still going round, being cited, that is absolute bull.

No, women aren’t likelier to cheat when fertile. What sort of Lilith shit is this?

Quite the opposite.

http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/comm/haselton/webdocs/EHB.pdf
It’s been debunked, for many years.

If you can’t read/understand beyond the abstract.

“Women’s desire for their own partners did not differ significantly between high and low fertility sessions”.

This happened when they actually tested what was only suggested (to get published) in the previous study, that has never been replicated.

If anything high fertility makes her more interested in her mate, which matches literally all the evobio on the topic, including Trivers and the fact that overwhelmingly most fathers are the biological fathers of their children. The exception is a forced match (arranged marriage) to an inferior male, see last post on ugly men. Sexual selection will occur in women, before or after nuptials, get used to it. Naturally, men denying that looks have anything to do with sexual attraction (LOL) will continue to ignore the most important variable in Darwinian theories – your genes.

Where you can go back to Peterson’s bollocks and choke on all his little blue pills.

Ugly men encourage cheating

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1559901/

If bad genes would put one sex off, it’d be the party that would have to carry them. Tend them. For decades. You know, the one putting money down if this is a gambling analogy.
Much better not to shack up with the uggo in the first place, which is what women have been doing (avoiding ugly men) since parental set-ups ended. Putting an end to arranged marriages is one of the most eugenic things to ever happen, second only to giving r-types the Pill and other abortfacients.

They’d be most likely to miscarry such children regardless, so a naturalistic fallacy doesn’t apply. This is a reversal of a dysgenic societal pressure with freedom of choice, not a natural pressure. There is a real-world consequence to mating (marrying) such low-quality men that used to be disposed of in endless wars: lower fitness than the parents, a biological death-knell.

There are more bachelors than ever because women aren’t forced to marry anyone who’d support them. If the woman can do it better for herself (given equal opportunities), the man is too poor quality to deserve fecundity. Men purchase rights to a woman’s reproductive decisions with marriage, that’s literally the whole premise. Monogamy had to be imposed to avoid unrest and rebellion against rulers, because it’s better for low-quality males (they actually get to breed and don’t ‘resort’ to rape – not an excuse) and worse for all females, since the natural exclusion (men used to be kicked out of the tribe at age) of the shit-tier doesn’t occur to the gene pool either they or their children and grandchildren will marry into… Naturally, the uggos in question hate this. Inferiority in humans is often connected to misogyny, despite how women are the life-giving, less violent and kinder sex (aliens would view those as objectively superior traits). Happy men don’t have to take anything out on women (displacement) because they are secure.

Narcissism and other personality disorder is always preceded by insecurity.

It reminds me of the bad husbands who complain of sexless marriages. Anyone with an ounce of empathy or life experience with women, happy couples, would laugh at such a concept, since sex in a marriage is a symptom, an outcome, a barometer. As in, they expect not to change but their marriage to improve, magically, for purely selfish reasons. Like it’s them + sex toy, no union, no greater labour required from the ‘master’ of the house. Rarely do the men in such marriages carry just their financial weight (the one entailed in the vows, also why pre-nups are anti-Christian since you swore until death you’d be responsible). Incompetent men used to be screened before they could marry, in the courtship stages interacting with the parents. Now, divorce is common because courtship has been shortened and too superficial. If they can’t be married, successfully, the marriage cannot continue. It’s a job. Rather than correcting their fellow men, to be capable husbands and fathers, they complain about women being shallow (projection). I suppose it’s the r-selected urge to appease other men and avoid real conflict, which they know women are too good to really instigate. Wife-beaters aren’t sneered at from sexism, it’s because a man hitting a woman knows it isn’t a fair fight. He knows his risk of death is almost nil. That’s cowardice.

Damaging the one human you swore to protect? Evil.

Hypocrisy doesn’t work long-term. Only an anti-honour culture like ours would think this.

You don’t deserve shit. Like, does a fat SJW deserve a 6ft model with a 6-pack because she got bullied for years? Exactly, it’s shit, you know it’s bullshit, sit down and stop.

You cannot be entitled to a human. They’re autonomous. An atheist cannot expect a Christian. A slut cannot expect a virgin. You get your level. That’s the red pill – you deserve what you get.

So technically, unequal pairings encourage cheating. Common sense?

Once a cheater, always a cheater says Science

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-017-1018-1

And biology.

And common sense.

Like it isn’t a personal defect or a compulsion?

A list of the common ‘Devil made me do it‘s would be funnier.

..I had to? I was drunk? I didn’t know what I was doing? It was one time? It was your fault? If you loved me ___? This is normal? I did nothing?

never trust an r-type

weak pair bonds are literally a defining attribute

Sex and the Narcissist – 2 flavours

The porn addict

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/narcissism/2016/08/sex-the-narcissist-sadism-pt-1/

The manwhore

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/narcissism/2016/08/sex-the-narcissist-sex-addict-pt-2/

I have nothing to add, really.
The former is more likely a male borderline, in my opinion.

It’s about controlling the other person, hurting them, whether it’s setting one-sided ‘rules’ (that make no sense) or defiling them (usually more religious, actually, Madonna/Whore idealization/devaluation at play).

It’s popular to say rape is about power. It isn’t, it’s about pleasure. Sadistic pleasure.

Consensual sex is a power exchange.

Update: The second category isn’t purely a sociopathic thing.
For the second category that isn’t a predator but instead compulsive and lacking in fulfillment, self-control etc…

“Earlier research revealed that 87% of sex addicts were raised in emotionally neglectful families (Carnes, 1998).”
“Generally, sex addiction is an attachment disorder, meaning that the addict is unable to connect with themselves or others, and these patterns were learned in childhood from emotionally neglectful or abusive caregivers.”
from https://blogs.psychcentral.com/childhood-neglect/2017/07/what-no-one-ever-told-you-about-sex-addiction/

I seemed harsh because I was referring to the sexual predators that plague both sexes.
People with real issues need help, professional help.

Asian Immigrants and What No One Mentions Aloud

“often fail to embody the sterling academic credentials they include with their applications, and do not live up to the expectations these universities have for top tier students.
Less delicately put: They cheat.”

We know. We all know. They can’t speak full English, FFS. They can’t reason and inspire the way their personal statement does.

you, an intellectual, might ask: how is this fair to non-Asians?

It isn’t.

educationrealist

To continue my thoughts on college admissions and Asians:

Many people, reading of the clear discrimination against Asians, become all righteous, thinking of those poor, hardworking Asians. Come to America, work hard, and look how the system screws them.

But that reaction ignores the stereotype.

The stereotype, delicately put: first and second generation Chinese, Korean, and Indian Americans, as well as nationals from these countries, often fail to embody the sterling academic credentials they include with their applications, and do not live up to the expectations these universities have for top tier students.

Less delicately put: They cheat. And when they don’t cheat, they game tests in a way utterly incomprehensible to the Western mind, leading to test scores with absolutely zero link to underlying ability. Or both. Or maybe it’s all cheating, and we just don’t know it. Either way, the resumes are functional fraud.

Is it true for…

View original post 3,568 more words

Jolie and genophobia

(hatred of one’s own)

Credit: GSOGM

Credit: GSOGM

Oh, it’s real.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-501284/Angelina-Jolie-My-blonde-haired-natural-daughter-Shiloh-outcast-family.html

Don’t marry a slut and wonder why she fucks you.

Technically she isn’t white, but as you can tell from that article, she despises the blond-haired, blue-eyed white genes she married and used for children.

I’m not saying that’s why the refugees, the divorce and her screwed up daughter who got the trendy idea from someone that she was, in fact, a boy…. but that would explain it, wouldn’t it?

oh damn wow ah

It’s always the people doing Shame on You in public that can’t even keep their own lives in order.

I heard Brad’s been depressed for most of their marriage, or he never would’ve allowed all those exotic drains on his salary, but they’re both cheating slimeballs so who cares?

I don’t think he cheated first, however much I dislike both of them.
I heard they had an open marriage and that was his term for marrying the bitch.
Apparently she’s worse than Leigh in the crazy stakes. All allegedly, of course.

Openly —

Brad Pitt: ‘She’s crazy, but I still love her’
Angelina Jolie: ‘Brad and I drive each other mad’

lara croft woke up this morning hated everything anger rage

relevant gif is relevant

Now she asks for privacy as she drives the knife in because she refused to let him parent her eldest foreign purchase.
http://www.tmz.com/2016/09/22/brad-pitt-child-abuse-investigation/
Never trust an r-type.
http://nypost.com/2016/09/22/brangelina-proves-you-should-never-trust-a-cheater/
“A 2013 survey from the book “The Normal Bar” found that 33 percent of men and 19 percent of women have admitted to being unfaithful at some point in their lives.”

Marion’s French, they don’t think much of monogamy. I find it funny cheats expect their monogamy to be respected.

“A lot of times, cheating has nothing to do with your partner and everything to do with who you are as a person,” Strauss says.

Honestly, both of them are terrible, and I take neither side.
Both cheats, both at least had substance problems, both insufferably vain, it’s karma in action.

As far as child abuse allegations go, read how she calls the blonde one The Blob.

http://gawker.com/227014/angelina-jolie-prefers-hand-picked-refugees-to-blob-of-her-loins

I know it’s Gawker, but once you read it, you’ll see why it’s astounding they, of all people, published this.

R-selected blame genes

Cheating is the opposite of pair bonding. If you can do it, there’s something wrong with you and the honest thing (they can’t be trusted in social relations either) would be to split up before straying.

If you’re a cheat, you aren’t monogamous. Monogamy is a bond. If the bond is broken, there is no relationship.

One minor correction: there is no evolutionary benefit for men cheating.
That is a myth. Based purely on pregnancy odds (actually rape leads to more conception, so that’s a dark path of naturalistic fallacies to argue), not the birth of a child or its own reproductive success (true success).

See Trivers.

In fact, if you look at the evidence?

It reduces reproductive success.

Look at the children of deadbeat fathers for the social proof too.