Freedom of thought

If you can’t say it, you can’t think it.

https://quillette.com/2018/06/10/giving-devil-due-freedom-inquiry-science-politics-inviolable/

 In 1989, the New South Wales parliament in Australia passed the Anti-Discrimination Act that includes these chilling passages, Orwellian in their implications:

The law invests in the Anti-Discrimination Board the power to* determine whether a report is ‘fair,’ and whether a discussion is ‘reasonable,’ ‘in good faith,’ and ‘in the public interest.’ The Board will pronounce upon the acceptability** of artistic expression, research papers, academic controversy, and scientific questions. An unfair (i.e., inaccurate) report of a public act may expose the reporter and the publisher to damages of up to $40,000.3

*Laws can’t change shit about reality, they have no such “power”.

**The worst kind of church.

The Left always does the same thing: pretends to be nice, gets in power, censors, punishes, intimidates, introduces freedom-killing laws and eventually shoots free-thinkers in the back of the head when re-education*** fails.

Gaslighting*** when an individual does it.

The Berkeley police finally restored order, moving the crowd out of the building and into the street, where they continued to chant, shout, and demonstrate.

“Demonstrate” civil unrest ya mean?

It isn’t a violent mob if it’s students?

Shoot them like dogs if they won’t act like humans.

Use the pellets if you aren’t hard enough for bullets. Water jets?

Since Irving’s invitation to speak came from the Berkeley Coalition for Free Speech, they apparently also no longer teach irony at that institution.

ba dum dum tssh

And given the horrific history of race relations in America such hate speech laws could be rationalized

Is that a joke?

as relevant to the claim that there are genetically-determined differences between blacks and whites

Races do exist, it’s the basis of forensics?

in intelligence, because such information (whether true or false) might lead white supremacists and other bigots to commit violence against blacks.

THE TRUTH IS NOT AN EXCUSE.

THE TRUTH IS NOT AN EXCUSE.

Because parts of science may be true but not all science is legal to discuss.

Land of the FREEEEEEEEE…..

Or, considering the long struggle women have had to gain parity to men,

still haven’t

one could argue

if one is a liar

that research on gender differences in cognitive abilities could turn back the clock on women’s rights

no?

The economy isn’t suddenly going to lose the majority of its workforce on a Maybe.

should a disparity be found in favor of the gender still dominant in positions of power.

The laws showing favour to women are based in those differences, same with race.

You cannot deny those differences while pushing for laws founded on them.

Since people act on their beliefs,

Not violently, they don’t. Unless you curtail their freedom to passively avoid.

Freedom of association keeps society peaceful.

and beliefs are expressed in the form of speech,

To be challenged.

You can’t challenge someone who isn’t talking.

isn’t it reasonable to argue that certain scientific findings be categorized as a form of hate speech that should be censored?

No.

Science describes reality.

You do not have the power to censor reality.

Nobody does.

You cannot magically raise African nations’ IQs either. This is King Canute levels of delusion.

Social engineering was a fraud. Head Start didn’t work on little white Timmy either!

Diverse or equal, you cannot claim both. First place or no winners, pick. Merit or bias?

What they really want is a visible hierarchy you are forbidden to question.

To know who rules over you….

Thankfully, the populace always outnumbers them. And more people means more brains noticing the same observations and reality.

People will notice and if you make it taboo, they’ll think about it more.

That’s how oppression works.

Angela Merkel admitted the experiment of multiculturalism failed, why can’t we discuss this?

Hate speech is a postmodern construct that won’t last the century. You cannot rule a feeling illegal. The CPS are not psychics divining feelings from the ether and it isn’t enforced equally, it’s enforced against whites and therefore, illegal by our original founding laws. “Protected groups”, the basis for the “positive” discrimination (end) of justice do not exist either because we are all equal under the law according to the true and real law. Justice is blind. And if science is to be believed, everyone is racist, so either it doesn’t count by neutralisation OR every crime, is a hate crime – that’s impossible to enforce and again, neutralises.

Stereotypes are statistically true and if social science continues to deny its un-PC findings, it will find itself de-funded, put on trial for abuse of position and on the wrong side of history.

Under the law equality is a legal construct, technically a legal fiction.

For example, the legal fiction will expect a man can run to a fire alarm until in a case one turns up to court in a wheelchair. Then the fiction dissolves, in that case. It is not kid gloves, the way it’s treated.
Being treated with dignity is something else entirely, mostly a personal decision (they mis-inform to bias) to treat someone as average, above or below (but still human) and the law cannot demand respect from one subject to another, no man can insist on being accorded honourable status without earning it.

The Honour’s List is a joke, full of preening narcissists.

The law has over-stepped its place for decades. We never needed a race relations act for millennia! If people can’t act like civilized First Worlders, should they even be here? To be tolerated in our land is their privilege, their immigrant privilege, not their right.

Even that has its conditions and that applies to say, whites in Africa.

As for Europe?

They never conquered us and we never voted for them to be nor remain here.

We refuse to worship invaders and kiss the toes of traitors.

End

Positive = Punishing children for what their fathers might’ve done. Treating natives as second-class in their rightful homeland because treating anyone as second class is what evil tyrants do.

They never enforce by class, do they? You’ll find most non-whites protected by such laws are middle-class against the working-class aka it’s social INJUSTICE.

It’s become illegal to offend the middle class.

Nobody gives a shit if Christian white van man is offended. Oh, but volunteer for the army, and you won’t get hired in the police!

The new no Irish signs.

The justification of such laws in the consequentialist argument that people might be incited to discrimination, hate, or violence if exposed to such ideas fails the moment you turn the argument around and ask:

No?

People think.

Thinking is not a crime, a thought is not violence.

Any idea that can die with the slightest criticism, should.

They have one job and people are noticing the lies.

If you won’t inform them of the truth, they’ll hate you.

Scientism: the false belief that objective reality is politically correct.

Scientism is dying, like the non-whites and women science pretends aren’t any different, and so cannot legally develop functional medication for!

[Metaphor is also not dehumanizing or all Disney films are illegal.]

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2014/06/11/immigration-or-invasion/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/11/05/why-are-terrorist-attacks-so-shocking-to-westerners/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/16/video-stage-zero-of-white-advocacy/

EXTRA EXTRA

[i’m always extra]

Tangents, get cha tangents here!

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/30/study-physiology-and-political-psychology/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/29/knowing-the-history-of-slavery-can-get-you-fired/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/29/americans-dont-know-logical-fallacies-ex-a/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/29/amygdala-and-the-fractured-ego-of-the-left/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/27/link-who-is-we-paleface/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/27/society-is-homogeneous/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/25/predictable-cuck-as-clockwork/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/19/imitating-israel/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/17/link-tolerance-isnt-a-virtue/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/17/the-indigenous-peoples-front/

Video: Questioning any Jew = anti-Semitism

And it means you must believe in lizard people, while we’re packing that strawman tight.

I like the part where he rubs his hands.

Have you noticed that fidgeting is a trait in liars?

I keep trying to link these things but the sites involved won’t let me embed. Other people sure, but not me.


URL http://www.facebook.com/Channel4News/videos/vb.6622931938/10155283077186939/

One Jew speaks for all, right? Totally logical, huh.

Is it really unbiased to conduct research apparently hostile to the motivations of your group? Especially since you’re hostile of their motivations before you even know them? Are you Jewish or not? He tries to claim Jew but not Jew, my fellow white but better? It’s confusing to watch.

I like it when they vaguely refer to sacrifice considering the amount of slaughter in the Talmud.
How about you quote from the Talmud about gentiles to prove how peaceful it is?

That’s what Muslims do and we all know how nice they are.

This misuse of the term scapegoat also needs to stop. Scapegoats are innocent, love. Are Jews somehow superhuman Chosen People, blameless and spotless and incapable of doing wrong?
Equality means you can call out anyone on their BS. Anyone. Your religion is no more an excuse than a Christian, while we’re talking Judeo-Christian mythos.
Does every group have unfair stereotypes? Duh.
But everyone does, so making this all about Jews… doesn’t work. Special pleading is a fallacy.Like Jews are the only put-upon, oppressed group.

Except, the data says they’re privileged. Really, really privileged. Like, substantially more likely to be a member of an elite profession or group, privileged. Undeniable privilege. Can we not question authority now?

Aren’t you liberals? Why censor random internet bullshit, if it’s ridiculous?

Why not blonde jokes and porn?


You wanted identity politics and you got it. Asians are now replacing Jews on campus. Always marrying those with power, Jews are now predictably marrying out to Asians instead of Europeans, see Zuck himself. If you keep bringing up Judaism, people will assume it’s relevant.

Zionism is completely separate. Criticism of Israel is different. One is an ideology and a domineering one, the other a state that governs people well or badly.

You are not without sin because of who your parents were, especially in discussions of privilege. A better question would be to ask the Jews making you look bad, why they’re doing it?

Ah, but you can’t even openly question your fellow Jews, can you? Telling.

Guess it’s back to non sequitur and ad hominem. It won you the last few elections, right?

It’s a bit like the race card. If you keep playing it, the term eventually means nothing.
You can’t even admit if it’s a race, religion or both. You treat it like both so other people follow. There are rafts of DNA studies to support this. Don’t be anti-science.

Nobody is exempt from questions of privilege.

Justice is blind. We don’t give a shit who you are, we care about what you’re doing.

Freud! Sexual theory, inversion

http://www.bartleby.com/278/1.html
I think people don’t read Freud because they assume they know what he will say.

Stay tuned for traps, queers, degeneracy and genetic aspersions.

It’s like asking a Communist for a good book on capitalism. Psychodynamics is the natural enemy of postmodernism. Everything you do is loaded with meaning, nothing you say matters. It isn’t perfect but it has use. It digs down into motive, unlike, say, the gay triangle of CBT, where thoughts magically pop out of nowhere ~dynamic unconsciousness screams into the void~

“Degeneration.—This term degeneration is open to the objections which may be urged against the promiscuous use of this word in general. It has in fact become customary to designate all morbid manifestations not of traumatic or infectious origin as degenerative. Indeed, Magnan’s classification of degenerates makes it conceivable that the highest general configuration of nervous accomplishment need not exclude the application of the concept of degeneration. Under the circumstances it is a question what use and what new content the meaning of “degeneration” still possesses. It would seem more appropriate not to speak of degeneration: (1) Where there are not many marked deviations from the normal; (2) where the capabilities and the capacity to exist do not in general appear markedly impaired. 6  15″

Hello, DSM 5.

n.b. The ICD is the DSM only stronger. It’s a huge, honest list of insurance codes. They don’t pretend to care about you, pay the man and take your pills.

A momentary pause for memes that get funnier the more psychodynamics you know.

     

“Degeneration.—This term degeneration is open to the objections which may be urged against the promiscuous use of this word in general. It has in fact become customary to designate all morbid manifestations not of traumatic or infectious origin as degenerative. Indeed, Magnan’s classification of degenerates makes it conceivable that the highest general configuration of nervous accomplishment need not exclude the application of the concept of degeneration. Under the circumstances it is a question what use and what new content the meaning of “degeneration” still possesses. It would seem more appropriate not to speak of degeneration: (1) Where there are not many marked deviations from the normal; (2) where the capabilities and the capacity to exist do not in general appear markedly impaired. 6  15  That the inverted are not degenerates in this qualified sense can be seen from the following facts:  16  1. The inversion is found among persons who otherwise show no marked deviation from the normal.  17  2. It is found also among persons whose capabilities are not disturbed, who on the contrary are distinguished by especially high intellectual development and ethical culture. 7  18  3. If one disregards the patients of one’s own practice and strives to comprehend a wider field of experience, he will in two directions encounter facts which will prevent him from assuming inversions as a degenerative sign.  19  (a) It must be considered that inversion was a frequent manifestation among the ancient nations at the height of their culture. It was an institution endowed with important functions. (b) It is found to be unusually prevalent among savages and primitive races, whereas the term degeneration is generally limited to higher civilization (I. Bloch). Even among the most civilized nations of Europe, climate and race have a most powerful influence on the distribution of, and attitude toward, inversion. 8  20″

Nurture theorists got nothing on this man.

“Innateness.—Only for the first and most extreme class of inverts, as can be imagined, has innateness been claimed, and this from their own assurance that at no time in their life has their sexual impulse followed a different course. The fact of the existence of two other classes, especially of the third, speaks against the assumption of its being congenital. Hence, the propensity of those holding this view to separate the group of absolute inverts from the others results in the abandonment of the general conception of inversion. Accordingly in a number of cases the inversion would be of a congenital character, while in others it might originate from other causes.…..

The Relation of Bisexuality.—Since the time of Frank Lydston, Kiernan, and Chevalier, a new stream of thought has been introduced for the explanation of the possibility of sexual inversion. This contains a new contradiction to the popular belief which assumes that a human being is either a man or a woman.”

Unfortunately, Freud appeared to have predicted all this gender binary business.

“The conception which we gather from this long known anatomical fact is the original predisposition to bisexuality, which in the course of development has changed to monosexuality, leaving slight remnants of the stunted sex.”

Sexuality is fluid down generations. Evolution. No naturalistic fallacy about bonobos here, plz.

“Psychic hermaphroditism would gain in substantiality if parallel with the inversion of the sexual object there should be at least a change in the other psychic qualities, such as in the impulses and distinguishing traits characteristic of the other sex. But such inversion of character can be expected with some regularity only in inverted women; in men the most perfect psychic manliness may be united with the inversion. …”

Lesbian neuroscience testosterone studies. 2D:4D ratios. The homosexual male’s femininity is a parody, a social role. They had no trouble hiding it when it was illegal.

He did write a whole book on Leonardo assuming he was homosexual, the reason moderns assume it, so he may be slightly biased in favour of the male purely because his own mother abandoned him to a nanny. We call this attachment issues in child psychology but it’s essentially Freud Pure.

“The conception which we gather from this long known anatomical fact is the original predisposition to bisexuality, which in the course of development has changed to monosexuality, leaving slight remnants of the stunted sex.”

Kinsey hasn’t got shit on Freud.
~confetti~

“A spokesman of the masculine inverts stated the bisexual theory in its crudest form in the following words: “It is a female brain in a male body.” But we do not know the characteristics of a “female brain.” The substitution of the anatomical for the psychological is as frivolous as it is unjustified. The attempted explanation by v. Krafft-Ebing seems to be more precisely formulated than that of Ulrich but does not essentially differ from it. v. Krafft-Ebing thinks that the bisexual predisposition gives to the individual male and female brain cells as well as somatic sexual organs.”

Sounds epigenetic.

“These centers develop first towards puberty mostly under the influence of the independent sex glands. We can, however, say the same of the male and female “centers” as of the male and female brains; and moreover, we do not even know whether we can assume for the sexual functions separate brain locations (“centers”) such as we may assume for language.  33  After this discussion, two thoughts, as it were, remain; first, that a bisexual predisposition is to be presumed for the inversion also, only we do not know wherein it exists beyond the anatomical formations; and, second, that we are dealing with disturbances which are experienced by the sexual impulse during its development. 11  34  ”

Number of abuse victims studies. Sheer quantity, cannot be ignored.
And have you ever met a gay guy that loves his father?
Fuck you, Dad!” the lifestyle crisis.

Traditionally, all fathers asked of their sons was to produce another heir….

crude compensation or coping mechanism
another thrilling round of-

“The Sexual Object of Inverts.—The theory of psychic hermaphroditism presupposed that the sexual object of the inverted is the reverse of the normal. The inverted man, like the woman, succumbs to the charms emanating from manly qualities of body and mind; he feels himself like a woman and seeks a man.  35  But however true this may be for a great number of inverts it by no means indicates the general character of inversion. There is no doubt that a great part of the male inverted have retained the psychic character of virility, that proportionately they show but little the secondary characters of the other sex, and that they really look for real feminine psychic features in their sexual object. If that were not so it would be incomprehensible why masculine prostitution, in offering itself to inverts, copies in all its exterior, to-day as in antiquity, the dress and attitudes of woman.”

The original ‘are traps gay?’

To round off by repeating one section considering our current knowledge of the microbiome and the possible role of Gay Germ theory.

“It has in fact become customary to designate all morbid manifestations not of traumatic or infectious origin as degenerative. ”

How about you read the thing before taking an SJW’s word for it?

Their definition of homophobia and privilege are also deeply Freudian.

A Comic About Real Privilege

Some genius reworded the comic from
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/05/30/when-liberals-speak-of-privilege-they-are-trying-to-obscure-issues-of-class/ to reflect social reality.

Here it is: http://therightstuff.biz/2015/05/31/ftfy-comics-a-plateful-of-hate/

The real privilege is others excusing your failure.

ugh why no please stop god kill me now rdj tony stark

Notice how the “hero” in the original had to be a brown girl?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_analogy#False_analogy

The same people who say http://www.rural-revolution.com/2015/05/stop-reading-to-your-children-its-unfair.html

and want to drag EVERYONE down to the lowest common denom.

 

Why is “check your privilege” popular? Master-suppression techniques and kafkatrapping

I want to put in a recc. for thought-terminating cliche. Which the SJW lot at wikipedia have deleted as a standalone page.

Lifton said:[4][5]

The language of the totalist environment is characterized by the thought-terminating cliché. The most far-reaching and complex of human problems are compressed into brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized and easily expressed. These become the start and finish of any ideological analysis.

Kafkatrapping is basically: Your refusal to acknowlege (sin) is proof of (sin) and that is why we condemn you. Yes, history buffs. Witch trial logic. 

It relies on self-hatred and vague evil authorities (cough capitalism)

Sometimes the kafkatrap is presented in less direct forms. A common variant, which I’ll call the Model C, is to assert something like this: “Even if you do not feel yourself to be guilty of {sin,racism,sexism, homophobia,oppression…}, you are guilty because you have benefited from the {sinful,racist,sexist,homophobic,oppressive,…} behavior of others in the system.” The aim of the Model C is to induce the subject to self-condemnation not on the basis of anything the individual subject has actually done, but on the basis of choices by others which the subject typically had no power to affect. The subject must at all costs be prevented from noticing that it is not ultimately possible to be responsible for the behavior of other free human beings.

A close variant of the model C is the model P: “Even if you do not feel yourself to be guilty of {sin,racism,sexism, homophobia,oppression…}, you are guilty because you have a privileged position in the {sinful,racist,sexist,homophobic,oppressive,…} system.” For the model P to work, the subject must be prevented from noticing that the demand to self-condemn is not based on the subject’s own actions or choices or feelings, but rather on an in-group identification ascribed by the operator of the kafkatrap.

It is essential to the operation of all three of the variants of the kafkatrap so far described that the subject’s attention be deflected away from the fact that no wrongdoing by the subject, about which the subject need feel personally guilty, has actually been specified. The kafkatrapper’s objective is to hook into chronic self-doubt in the subject and inflate it, in much the same way an emotional abuser convinces a victim that the abuse is deserved – in fact, the mechanism is identical. Thus kafkatrapping tends to work best on weak and emotionally vulnerable personalities, and poorly on personalities with a strong internalized ethos.

“Oppression”
“Institutional”
“Global”
“____ Culture”
and so forth.

Professor coins “liberal privilege”

http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/18016/

“Far more pervasive is “liberal privilege.” The very people who accuse others of not being sufficiently grateful for their status are guilty of taking their own advantages for granted. Liberals do not seem to recognize the special treatment they receive. They actually believe they are nicer and smarter than others as a result of having been allowed to get away with this conceit.

Liberals, because they are liberal, assume they are more compassionate than anyone who disagrees with them. From elementary school on, they are praised for their concerns about the welfare of others — even though this kindness is only manifested in verbal declarations.

Likewise, from the earliest grades, their teachers applaud their superior intelligence. Since they agree with the principles they are being taught and regurgitate them on cue, they are regarded as unusually perceptive. Critical thinking, although orally encouraged, is, in practice, punished.

And so liberals grow up in a bubble of self-deception. Their self-esteem is grounded in conforming to beliefs that do not accord with reality, but which nevertheless earn them gold stars and certificates of achievement.

Then they enter the real world. Yet for them, it is not altogether real. The books they read and the television shows they watch confirm their special status. Liberal newsreaders and authors assure them they are better than their conservative peers. Clearly, they are more generous and insightful than these relics.”

“#LiberalPrivilege – Is OK with discrimination, as long as it’s against Christians

#LiberalPrivilege – They are for free speech – unless it’s something they disagree with

#LiberalPrivilege – They are against racism – but support affirmative action quotas based on skin color”

May I add having no valid opinion on crime because you live in nice neighbourhoods? Having no idea how the economy works because you gained your job through nepotism? Having no one gang up on you and slander your person for owning your opinions?

#liberalprivilege “When I do it, it’s different.”

Where did “Check your privilege” come from? Check your spoons.

h/t to mindweapon for topic

Here’s the original “spoon story”. You couldn’t make a better satire of SJWhiners.
http://www.butyoudontlooksick.com/wpress/articles/written-by-christine/the-spoon-theory/

It’s supposed to be a metaphor for expending energy to pass for normal.
Where I come from, telling someone to check their spoons means they’ve been robbed.

Try to take solace in the echo chambers because one day their wifi will die