I could just pretend I didn't see or hear this too. pic.twitter.com/aqQQNuLrTR
— Vicky (@vickyintheuk) September 6, 2020
No Society Allowed
No Society Allowed
I have to post this now because the product push is in full swing and it could literally save tiny lives.
I can’t wait until October, all the “influencers” are pushing this online NOW. Ethically, I must put my ego aside.
A lot of Pill failures are actually in the hippy chicks taking plant “extracts”. That’s why doctors now ask young women about supplements and herbal remedies immediately after the contraception question. It wouldn’t be ethical to study pill failures but they know there’s a link.
so in context:
“How Smoking Marijuana Damages The Fetal Brain” is horrifying.
“Earlier studies have already found that children of marijuana-smoking mothers more frequently suffer from permanent cognitive deficits, concentration disorders, hyperactivity, and impaired social interactions than non-exposed children of the same age and social background.”
so you cannot blame poverty, Karen.
Remember, they’re now encouraging wine moms to drink while pregnant.
They used to claim nicotine was a “safe” plant extract because the addictive property was removed, supposedly.
“CBD, THC use during early pregnancy can disrupt fetal development”
Nicotine was justified as anti-inflammatory too, and it is:
Weird how all these CBD products were pushed before safety studies like this, and now we have corona-chan distracting.
“A new study published in Scientific Reports, a Nature Research journal, shows how a one-time exposure during early pregnancy to cannabinoids (CBs) – both synthetic and natural—can cause growth issues in a developing embryo. This is the first research to show such a connection in mammals.”
One-time. But not a drug, ya see. That makes sense.
It’s the first research to LOOK. Why was this cleared? And who calls CBD safe? Oh…. the WHO.
Let’s trust those guys!
“muh no public health risks”
Buckle up, I found a LOT.
“In this study, the brain and facial developmental effects caused by one-time exposure to CBs—CBD and THC (the primary ingredients of marijuana)—are very similar to what is seen in fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS). Parnell and colleagues also found that when CBs and alcohol were used together, the likelihood of these birth defects more than doubled. They went on to show that these drugs may be causing defects by interacting on a basic cellular level and disrupting signaling between molecules and cells that control growth and development.”
“The CBD amounts administered were within what is considered a therapeutic range for humans.”
“It is concerning how little we know about the use of marijuana, its CBs, and products like CBD oil during pregnancy,” Parnell said. “We know that there is no safe period to drink alcohol during a pregnancy, and I think this research shows the same is likely true of marijuana use.”
Drinking once doesn’t cause FAS, so this is objectively worse. Don’t expect the tradlarpers to talk about anything important re child IQ and birth rates. Nope! Let’s talk about some twit on Twitter again.
I don’t care if you like your CBD rollerball, Karen! You’re better off aborting it now it’s brain damaged!
If you want to de-stress take a poxy bubble bath like a non-druggy.
I expect it causes more miscarriage too, with that effect.
With the results of these one-time exposures, Parnell and Fish are planning to now test smaller, multiple exposures throughout a pregnancy that better mimics real-life usage in human pregnancy.”
That came out after this:
“That’s concerning because CBD may interact with commonly used anesthetics that might be needed during labor and delivery.”
That’s because it’s a drug. It is a drug.
“Many women report that they use CBD oil during pregnancy in order to reduce pregnancy-related nausea.
In general, using CBD while one is pregnant is thought to be safer than smoking cannabis itself or THC-rich products.” [DS: we now know this is wrong, see above]
The hippy Karens must be stopped.
I bet it damages sperm too. That’s all the soy boys need.
There is a lack of conclusive data to determine the effects of CBD hemp oil on a fetus. However, it is known that a growing fetus is equipped with an endocannabinoid system, even when the fetus is only composed of two cells. This system is in all humans and even some animals. The endocannabinoid system is a system composed of endocannabinoids, which are neurotransmitters that bind to cannabinoid receptors.
In a study conducted on mouse embryos, researchers found that the compound THC inhibited the development of the embryos which contained less than eight cells. Another natural cannabinoid found in the human body, anandamide, also stopped the embryos from developing. CBD can increase levels of anandamide, so there may be negative effects associated with CBD use during pregnancy. It is important to note that this was a study conducted on mice and the results may not be transferable to human subjects.
If you’re gonna be a Western baby birth rate cult, talk about things like this.
The advice to women must account for this.
It’s called dope for a reason.
“marijuana causes significant brain changes by slowing activity in the frontal and temporal lobes”
there’s a known connection to schizophrenia in men, especially those who start before 21, earlier in the teens the higher the risk
“Some argue that marijuana is not addictive, but as it demonstrates, it is a drug like any other.”
I knew this so I had to post.
Alcohol is a drug and it is addictive (alcoholism is an addiction to alcohol, not mere consumption, it’s a pattern of chronic consumption with withdrawal during cessation). As soon as they call their poison “not addictive”, you know it is. It’s like hearing “I can quit any time I want”. Cognitive dissonance, a month of cessation would be intolerable for them.
re above study:
“after studying imaging of 1,000 cannabis users’ brains, there were signs of noticeable deficiencies of blood flow. The study, which included 25,168 non-cannabis users, and 100 healthy controls, shows a scary and obvious difference in blood flow levels for those that used cannabis. Additionally, those that used marijuana showed a significant lack of blood flow in the right hippocampus, the area of the brain that helps with memory formation. This part of the brain is severely affected with those that suffer from Alzheimer’s disease.”
“Our research has proven that marijuana users have lower cerebral blood flow than non-users.”
You also see sluggish cerebral flow in the low IQ. That’s why they call it dope. It has a dopifying effect.
Stupidity is bliss? It’s diagnostic.
“We identified a strong inverse relationship between performance IQ and CBF (-1.5 points per 10 mL/100 g/min increase in CBF, P = .013).”
CBF = cerebral blood flow
I’m not making shit up. If a perma-bachelor over the age of 25 (mature brain) wants to be a druggy, I don’t care. But don’t kill and brain damage the babies!
This has a lot of studies linked: https://www.solcbd.com/blogs/news/cbd-oil-and-fertility-have-facts
In a 2010 Italian paper published online by BioMed Central, the authors argue that disrupting the normal activities of these ECS pathways by adding cannabinoids “can significantly alter many vital in utero processes, including angiogenesis, cellular replication, tissue differentiation, and [fetal] neural cognitive development.”  ….
While THC exposure increased sexual receptivity in female hamsters and rats, it also inhibited their release of luteinizing hormones. These hormones are responsible for ovulation and the development of the corpus luteum. The latter is a hormone-secreting structure in the ovary that plays a role during very early pregnancy. 
They’re pushing CBD products as harmless and trendy onto MINORS.
Aimed at minors.
It inhibits development. Do the math. I couldn’t wait on this. I was going to post this last year but forgot.
In a 2016 paper published by BioMed Central, it is mentioned that in utero exposure to cannabis has been associated with early pregnancy failure, birth defects, and developmental delays in the fetus.
“The results of this study show that the use of cannabis in pregnancy is associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes. Prevention programs that address cannabis use during pregnancy are needed.”
“With the increasing publicity of marijuana due to recent legislation, it is pertinent that the effects of fetal exposure
to the drug are assessed. While in utero cannabis exposure has been associated with early pregnancy failure, birth defects and developmental delay, the mechanisms of such outcomes are largely unexplained. Furthermore, the use of cannabinoids in cancer treatment via growth inhibition and apoptosis may indicate how cannabis exposure likely harms a growing fetus. Cannabinoid signaling is required for proper pre-implantation development, embryo transport to the uterus, and uterine receptivity during implantation. In post-implantation development, cannabinoid signaling functions in a multitude of pathways, including, but not limited to, folic acid, VEGF, PCNA, MAPK/ERK, and BDNF. Disrupting the normal activity of these pathways can significantly alter many vital in utero processes, including angiogenesis, cellular replication, tissue differentiation, and neural cognitive development. This paper aims to demonstrate the effects of cannabis exposure on a developing embryo in order to provide a molecular explanation for the adverse outcomes associated with cannabis use during pregnancy.”
The authors also argue that cannabis exposure could very likely harm a fetus due to phytocannabinoids’ effect on cells. This is because CBD and other cannabinoids are associated with cell growth inhibition and cell death, which may be good news for the treatment of cancer, but not for a growing fetus. 
These findings were based on petri dish research, but the same trend was observed in most cell cultures, not just in cancer cells. Obviously, this could mean that healthy cell growth can also be affected. 
This is speculative, however, and not an easy subject to study clinically, but it is clear that much more research is needed before any phytocannabinoid can be declared safe for use by pregnant women.
There appears to be no traceable data regarding CBD and male fertility. The available research centers mostly on marijuana and fertility in males, and it is mostly negative, except for one finding.
How are these products on the market? HOW?
It feels like a DDT style case study waiting to happen.
This research, conducted by Dr. Hans Hatt of Ruhr University in Bochum, Germany, has discovered a receptor in sperm cells that is part of the ECS.
Called the GPR18 receptor, it plays a big role in conception. Dr. Hatt explains its function very simply: “The endocannabinoid activates the spermatozoa for fertilization.” This means that it helps the sperm to fertilize the egg or the ova.
The doctor also pointed out that this receptor responds to THC and another cannabinoid, anandamide, with involvement in the sperm’s ability to penetrate the ova. This is encouraging news, but much more study is needed before phytocannabinoids can be considered a possible therapy for male infertility. 
This is also because other research points in the opposite direction for men.
Birth defects suggest it messes with the sperm’s genetics.
And it does.
A total of 1,215 young Danish men aged 18-28 years were recruited between 2008 and 2012 when they attended a compulsory medical examination to determine their fitness for military service. The participants delivered a semen sample, had a blood sample drawn, and underwent a physical examination. They responded to questionnaires including information on marijuana and recreational drug use during the past 3 months (no use, use once per week or less, or use more than once per week). A total of 45% had smoked marijuana within the last 3 months. Regular marijuana smoking more than once per week was associated with a 28% (95% confidence interval (CI): -48, -1) lower sperm concentration and a 29% (95% CI: -46, -1) lower total sperm count after adjustment for confounders. The combined use of marijuana more than once per week and other recreational drugs reduced the sperm concentration by 52% (95% CI: -68, -27) and total sperm count by 55% (95% CI: -71, -31). Marijuana smokers had higher levels of testosterone within the same range as cigarette smokers. Our findings are of public interest as marijuana use is common and may be contributing to recent reports of poor semen quality.
I think we found a cause of generational infertility in men, suck up that red pill.
IVF high in Denmark, wonder why?
Peak health by age and it still impairs their sperm….
The cause is STDs and drugs, obviously. Always has been.
Men are lied to and the SJWs love it.
From the sol link:
The inability to conceive affects both men and women equally. Among couples experiencing infertility, roughly 35 percent is due to problems in the male, while another 35 percent is due to issues in the female. Another 20 percent is a combination of issues in both the male and the female, and the remaining 10 percent is unknown.
Apart from CBD oil for fertility, a number of alternative or complementary therapies are on the rise, all with varying degrees of success.
They claim CBD is antidepressant despite cerebral flow connection to causing it. Gotta keep selling those SSRIs.
“demonstrates that marijuana can have significant negative effects on brain function. The media has given a general impression that marijuana is a safe recreational drug, this research directly challenges that notion.”
Beware anything the MSM pushes. What do druggies do? Sit around watching TV and consuming other ‘entertainment’ like Netflix.
It’s a known scandal that American farms of it are basically a monopoly.
If the effect is anti-stress, it’s a drug. If that’s the only purpose, drink tea. Put on a nicotine patch.
They never explain fully the biological mechanism that makes it work like a drug, without literally being a drug.
The dropper form of CBD is literally a drug, drops are used in pediatrics on babies. It’s sublingual absorption. If it’s ‘extracted’ from a drug, works like a drug and is delivered like a drug… it’s a drug.
Should adults be allowed to be druggies? Over 25, maybe. But why must I pay for stressed-out Karen’s “treatments” on the NHS? Must I pay for her alcohol too? Can she pay for my naps and chocolate?
Why not legalise morphine and laudanum and all the other naughties you used to buy over the counter before the nanny state?
Because people would grow their own poppies. That’s why. It’s too easy to extract.
The method was flawless, before AND after.
“Several studies of perfusion imaging in marijuana users have shown similar results compared to ours. A small O15 PET study in a sample of 12 marijuana users used a randomized clinical trial design to examine brain perfusion before and after marijuana use. The study results found frontal, temporal and occipital lobe hypo-perfusion – all findings concordant with our study.
Zoomers aren’t stupid, they’re polluted.
Although it is often portrayed as harmless, and sometimes even therapeutic, there has not been nearly enough studies done to prove this. In fact, marijuana is often prescribed for issues like anxiety, though studies cannot comprehensively show this to be true. Currently, the available information on the impact marijuana has on the neurophysiology of the brain show, predominantly, depressive effects.”
It’s pushed on women to harm their fetus. Skin cream lingers for hours and ends up in the blood.
“By no stretch of the imagination could a contemporary author write so blithely of his seduction of underage girls – and, in Matzneff’s case, of boys too.”
Oh, like that’s worse? Because he also raped boys?
Seduction isn’t Hollywood, that’s a lie. By definition, seduction is against that person’s individual (legal) will and consent, and seduction is still illegal under common law for many reasons, especially of children.
Paedophiles have tried to normalise everything but a fetish to children and only to children is sadistic, they wish to harm and corrupt. That’s the process of evil.
“And even if he did, there would certainly be no-one leaping to his defence, accusing his detractors – like they accused Bombardier 30 years ago – of reactionary neo-Puritanism and failing to understand the wellsprings of teenage sexuality.”
I’m sure there’d be some Muslims in pick-up, somewhere, that’s the re-brand attempt.
It’s disgusting some Westerners try to justify these attacks, knowing the child outcomes of child abuse (mental problems, addictions, suicide, pair bonding issues as an adult, trauma and PTSD). Worse, they say it’s ‘culture’ if the predator is white but apparently a Muslim is so foreign. You can’t pick and choose pedos.
The real rape culture is the ‘free love’ left-wing ‘culture’ that assumes everyone is “up for it”, even children. But what was the kid WEARING when they were raped type of victim blaming. In the First World, we can show skin without some subhuman trying to absolve themselves from their actions with a convenient ‘loss’ of control, ‘loss’ of agency.
Bring back hanging for rapists, it’s very simple. They’ll magically find their impulse control if not enabled by victim culture that sees the scum of the earth as a ‘slave’ to their libido (who isn’t? deal like everyone else) who ‘can’t help’ (can’t resist) attacking. Let children and women defend themselves, they lack the physical strength to do it without weapons. Re-open the asylums if the poor, pitiful, woe-is-me predators can’t function in society, this is why we have so many now. They closed the asylums to normalise this.
Most predators are serial offenders, it’s a tiny group of pedos doing this.
There’s the telling projection of ‘fun’, pedos do find getting away with it ‘fun’ and try to groom victims to agree, to normalise.
“And yet just a generation ago, evidently, the idea of sex between adult men and adolescent girls was not only not shocking – in “enlightened” circles, that is. More than that, it was seen as liberating for the youngsters themselves – a final casting off of the sexual bonds imposed by the old pre-1968 order.”
The Kinsey data was forged, he was a sadist pedo into teen boys and eventually fired for it.
“Gradually his star faded. There was growing distaste for his sexual predilections, and before this latest controversy he was an all-but-forgotten figure outside the Left Bank.
But in 2020 the moral compass had shifted 180 degrees. What had been seduction was now abuse.”
It always was, it’s even in the law, from breach of promise to criminal conversation. Hollywood lies should not be treated as real. Hollywood has imposed a fake norm on us, glamourising predation, what we see now is Power to the People, from the internet.
Hell, they’re still making films that glamourise child rape e.g. A Bigger Splash. 2015?
“Frank Sinatra was arrested in 1938 on charges of adultery and seduction. Yes, they used to be able to arrest people and charge them with seduction, something that faced a 23-year-old Frank Sinatra.”
You want traditionalism? A high trust society? Re-instate the charges or the West shall perish.
It’s now called “grooming”, who could ever possibly agree with legally permitting grooming?
Protect women and children or the future is done for.
It’s a return to history the cuckservatives are too blue-pilled to ever suggest. What if it’s their daughter, their son? Their wife being accosted when they’re away at war? You can’t be around all the time, there must be legal recourse.
“What Matzneff saw as a celebration of sexual adventure with partners who, though young, were always consenting, had become an evil power game.”
No, they groom them, BBC. Children CANNOT consent, but psychologically abusing anyone would vitiate the ‘consent’, legally.
You can tell the BBC covers for pedos by pretending the victims are ‘up for it’.
Again, the laws pre-dated this for good reason, it was pro-social to protect children, boys and girls.
“And when publishing executive Vanessa Springora brought out a book this month describing the traumatic effects of her own relationship – aged 14 – with Matzneff, it was clear that he was now a literary non-person.”
Pedos lie, shocker. Predators lie about their victims.
They also lie to their victims – lovebombing, gaslighting, future faking (specifically covered under breach of promise) – things previously covered under seduction, now euphemistically called “grooming” (PC term, grooming for rape aka seduction). Coercion isn’t legal, whatever you do it for.
“In France the age of “sexual majority” is 15. If an adult has sex with a person under 15 he or she will face prosecution, though not necessarily for rape.”
Then why can’t they vote at 15? They don’t really consider them mentally able, which says it all.
France was over long before they invited the Muslim pedos. Actually, that’s why they invited the Muslim pedos.
Pedos like other pedos.
“At the age of 14 you are not supposed to have a 50-year-old man waiting for you when you come out of school; nor to share a hotel room with him and find yourself in his bed… when you should be having your tea,” writes Springora in Consent.”
Huge age gaps should be outlawed anyway, it always predicts some form of abuse beyond a solid generation (25-30 years or so). When one party’s brain hasn’t finished developing, we have no scientific reason to allow people under 25 to “date” whoever they want, the parents also dropped the moral ball and should be ashamed socially as enabling the rape of their child.
“The other people in his “seductions” also existed and their story is now being told.”
Pedos lie, they’re predators. If they’ll rape a child, boy or girl, why not lie about it?
This is like thinking murderers will obey gun laws.
Age of consent must be majority, sex is medical. Minimum age to marry must match as well, especially in a Catholic country, otherwise this is such a convenient oversight for the Weinsteins.
Europhilia is pedophilia with more wine.
Pushing the culture of places with dehumanising ages of consent, despite their claimed Catholic relgious background, is very telling.
France isn’t losing money on tourism because of Muslims, but the white, French men acting like brutes. It’s been losing money for decades thanks to the Boomer generation of degenerate losers. They’re stalking teenage girls (and pre-teens) and young women, shouting obscenities at them, trying to rub up against them on trains, publicly exposing themselves for public urination like a dog and flashing when a girl clearly just wants to go shopping.
The West needs to get its adult men in order, police to a first world standard already.
The Boomers who enabled this in media and TV should be up on charges of aiding and abetting trafficking, because a steady supply of groomed teenagers doesn’t just happen.
The stories of solicitation of women/girls also require punishment, there’s no such thing as ‘pick-up’, it’s solicitation.
Free love is free license to rapists and harassment, stalking, lying to get in a woman’s house are not uncommon. Psychiatrists know about these tactics. To catch a predator. The West needs to stop making excuses the predatory scum use to harm children, in particular.
Bear in mind, Jung bitterly referred to Freud’s work as “Jewish Psychology” after he left, because Freud generalised the problems of Jews (or normalised their pathologies) to all of humanity, falsely.
He was fundamentally intellectually dishonest, that is why a surgeon claimed to be the first psychiatrist.
Like, the aggression/low IQ link is somewhat known, but the circumcision/violent crime (especially rape) connection is almost unheard of….
What do the groups otherwise have in common?
This reads like something about Muslim slavers (sex slavery).
“the dismal history of how far too many of those cases have been assiduously concealed both from the public and from the police: how influential rabbis and community leaders have sided with the alleged abusers against their victims; how victims and witnesses of sexual abuse have been pressured, even threatened, not to turn to secular law enforcement for help; how autonomous Jewish ‘patrols,’ displacing the role of official police in some large and heavily religious Jewish neighbourhoods, have played an inglorious part in the history of cover-ups; … how some Jewish communities have even succeeded in manipulating law enforcement officials to protect suspected abusers.”
The likes of Kinsey were also frauds, previously covered and connected to sadistic pedophilia.
S&M used to be a pathology (as per Psychopathia Sexualis) but their ilk normalised it with postmodernism as an eccentric paraphilia. That isn’t strictly true, a paraphilia refers to objects and enjoying pain of others doesn’t meet the standard. They’ve also blocked “sexual sadist” and “sadistic personality” from entering the DSM (which would make it legally actionable) despite how Marquis de Sade types (read about his crimes) prevail in the modern day and forensic jurisprudence is powerless to label them.
The story has been told by Jeffrey Masson in The Assault on Truth: Freud’s Suppression of the Seduction Theory (1984). In 1895 and 1896, Freud, listening to his neurotic and hysterical patients, became convinced that most of them had suffered from traumatic sexual abuse in their childhood. The traumatic origin of “hysteria” (an overused diagnosis in those days) had already been discussed by neurologists, including Jean-Martin Charcot, whose conferences Freud had attended in Paris, and Hermann Oppenheim, who published in Berlin in 1889 a treatise on traumatic neuroses. Yet psychological traumas of sexual nature were rarely discussed openly. On the other hand, there were medical publications, known to Freud, documenting the frequency of violence on children, including sexual assaults, but they focused on the physical consequences. In April 1896, confident to have made a major breakthrough in psychiatry, Freud presented his findings to the Society for Psychiatry and Neurology in Vienna, his first major public address to his peers. His lecture met with total silence. According to Masson, Freud was urged never to publish it, lest his reputation be damaged beyond repair. He found himself isolated, but nevertheless published his paper, “The Aetiology of hysteria.”
Of course he did.
Freud wasn’t even the father of psychology, as is often claimed, it was the gentile Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt, a brilliant man.
He was conducting laboratory experiments into behavioural science (empirical) while Freud was a child.
Explain that, small hats.
Jewish “doctors” also told white women of the time they were oppressed by their husbands (especially since some men in those days were circumcised by concerned “doctors” and thus, dissatisfying to their wives – see below) and further, they were told they were too ‘frigid’ to be adulterers or fornicating whores and must remedy this aversion to promiscuity for their very sanity. That rhetoric continues to this day.
The Freemason and con artist quack salesman Holloway built a women’s college for the procurement of fresh meat and also an asylum for women who talked about all the Satanic abuse they suffered at the hands of powerful men, because that isn’t weird at all… then his wife suddenly died under suspicious circumstances and the building has known tunnels to places unknown… as well as a roof nobody is allowed to see on the tour. I’m sure they do nothing dodgy... but there’s a lot of Freemason symbology on the FRENCH styled castle if you go on the tour.
But the 1960s were seeded about half a century before, have no doubt.
If we take hysteria as a legitimate amygdala response to trauma, it cannot be definitively female, since plenty of boys are targeted by pedophiles (most pedos are male seeking male victims). Still, they toy with our language.
Some of Freud’s work is interesting e.g. inversion (cycle of abuse, projection) but don’t think for one minute he lacked motives.
It’s funny to watch Frasier and spot all the jokes in two categories: anti-white and childhood trauma.
It’s 90% of the show.
They’re really touchy if you point out no woman wants a man with a mutilated manhood:
“While some of the respondents commented that they thought the differences were in the men, not the type of penis, the consistency with which women felt more intimate with their unaltered partners is striking. Some respondents reported that the foreskin improved their sexual satisfaction, which improved the quality of the relationship. In addition to the observations of Maimonides in the 12th century, one survey found that marital longevity was increased when the male had a foreskin . Why the presence of the foreskin enhances intimacy needs further exploration.”
“The lower rates of fellatio, masturbation and anal sex among unaltered men  suggests that unaltered men may find coitus more satisfying .”
“”Clearly, the anatomically complete penis offers a more rewarding experience for the female partner during coitus…. Because these findings are of interest, the negative effect of circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner needs to be part of any discussions providing ‘informed consent’ before circumcision.”
They’ve been trying to destroy Christian marriages the same way their mothers destroyed theirs.
Circumcised men (partial castrati, technically) are impotent, the data’s in the link.
From top link:
Among other remarks, he suggests that children who aggress sexually other children do so as a result of having been sexually abused themselves: “children cannot find their way to acts of sexual aggression unless they have been seduced previously.”
True observation but…. how did he know?
Using Hollywood to spin seduction from predatory to complimentary lead to the pedophilia of various “rock stars” and actors. You can’t prove a negative. It blames the victim, gentile or child.
From the standpoint of Freud’s earlier theory—which he euphemistically called the “seduction theory”—his new theory of spontaneous infantile sexual fantasies can be seen as a projection, not unlike sex offenders’ tendency to blame their victims: the patients themselves are now accused of both sexual passion and murderous fantasies toward their parents. By repressing these self-generated impulses, says Freudian orthodoxy, they have created their own neuroses which may, in hysterics, take the forms of false memories of abuse.
“look what you made me do, sexy person” …savages
Sandor Ferenczi wrote in his diary in July 1932 that the Oedipus complex could well be “the result of real acts on the part of adults, namely violent passions directed toward the child, who then develops a fixation, not from desire [as Freud maintained], but from fear. ‘
Passion is a bad thing, whatever the publicity for the word. Read the Bible for more.
The First World has always rejected the excuse of “feels” for being bestial in sexual conduct. Jesus himself blames the lecher, lechery is a sin – existing in the vicinity of one is not.
Recently, a mother was shamed for not putting a bikini top on her child. …Why? What if a pedophile pinned her down, that’s still on the predator! Even if we did cordone off all attractive women and girls, the creeps would seek them out still. The r-solution is always protecting themselves from the responsibility for their own feels and acts.
His paper contains a number of important ideas confirmed by later research, such as the victims’ psychological “identification with the aggressor,” or “introjection”: “the aggressor disappears as external reality and becomes intrapsychic instead of extrapsychic,” so that even the guilt feelings of the aggressor are introjected. Ferenczi hypothesized that helplessness causes the victim to empathize with the aggressor, a process today known as “Stockholm syndrome”.
Why pedophiles claim their victims ‘love’ them.
Like serial killers who claim multiple women “made them” angry because they’re too weak to impulse control, so too is the sexual deviant and serial rapist (most acts of rape are re-offences by the same parties, SJWs dread mentioning this fact for fear we might not infantilise the predator and might not want them out in society after ‘rehab’, their deviant form of buying forgiveness from the church).
“Extreme adversity, especially fear of death,” may also trigger a premature development, for which Ferenczi uses the metaphor of “a fruit that ripens or becomes sweet prematurely when injured by the beak of a bird, or of the premature ripening of wormy fruit. Shock can cause a part of the person to mature suddenly, not only emotionally but intellectually as well.”
R-selection, deliberately depriving their future competition.
Creeps breed by predation, the young are just the softest prey. Most naive.
They actually never complete mental maturation, when the body skips ahead. Hinted here:
Such traumatic maturation happens at the expense of psychological integration, and Ferenczi brings in the notion of a personality split: “there can be no shock, no fright, without traces of a personality split.” In his personal diary, reflecting on a patient who cannot remember having been raped, but dreams of it ceaselessly, Ferenczi writes:
“I know from other analyses that a part of our being can ‘die’ and while the remaining part of our self may survive the trauma, it awakens with a gap in its memory. Actually it is a gap in the personality, because not only is the memory of the struggle-to-the-death effaced, but all other associatively linked memories disappear… perhaps forever.”
multiplicity, occurs in all people, rarely pathological
also why psychopaths are “nice” and oddly blank, like Bundy – to fit in better
still no excuse to commit offences, it doesn’t absolve the predator of criminal responsibility (the purpose of infantilisation)
actually, isn’t it funny offences went from rape and murder to saying certain words or ideas?
Pathological dissociation is a little different but various drugs pushed by the postmodern academics (most notably weed) produce dissociation on purpose then wonder why schizophrenia and brain retardation in development occurs during the critical windows.
….Secondly, and more importantly, why was Freud’s theory so successful, despite being long proven scientifically flawed, and its therapeutic value baseless?
They have an unspoken rule:
If it enables pedophiles, they keep it.
I’ve heard them discuss how we “cannot marginalise these groups” by “conforming to archaic notions of stigma”.
So stigma seems to be a keyword.
As if child abuse victims suffer no injury.
Well, the same sniff test passed with whores via the libertarian shitstains ignoring drug abuse, mental illness and suicide rates, so why wouldn’t they try it on?
They go after women first, then girls and boys, then finally the men too weak to stand up any of the other times. This is their MO, again and again.
First it’s “let your daughter strip”, then “let your grand-daughter ‘date’ age 12, by the way she’s on the Pill” and then “let your son be a drag dancer” and finally “by the way, we won’t let your grandson hit puberty because he glanced at a Barbie once”. The men who allow all those moral violations along the way and enable evil because they like the idea of brothels and porn are a pox on decency.
They don’t deserve to live in a First World society.
Most SJWs would cease to exist if men stood up to the moral rot at the ‘stripper’ stage. A lot of them secretly crave the old bans back on obscenity too, haven’t you noticed? They have a false moral consciousness. Hence their constant hand-flailing appeal for white men to “do something”.
We all know what.
Additional insight has been supplied by two books published almost simultaneously (1979), one in French and one in German, both translated in English in 1982: Marie Balmary, Freud and the Hidden Fault of the Father, and Marianne Krüll, Freud and His Father. Both draw extensively from Freud’s letters to Fliess, which document how Freud was led to his theoretical about-face by his introspective self-analysis. Balmary and Krüll point out that Freud undertook this self-analysis just after the death of his father Jacob. On November 2, 1896, ten days after his father’s death, Freud wrote to Fliess about a dream he had the night before the funeral, in which appeared a sign saying, “You are requested to close the eyes,” which he interpreted as referring to “one’s duty to the dead.” Yet on February 11, 1897, after mentioning that forced oral sex on children can result in neurotic symptoms, he adds: “Unfortunately, my own father was one of these perverts and is responsible for the hysteria of my brother (all of whose symptoms are identifications) and those of several younger sisters. The frequency of this circumstance often makes me wonder.” The following summer, he went through a depressive episode, and wrote on July 7: “I still do not know what has been happening to me. Something from the deepest depths of my own neurosis set itself against any advance in the understanding of the neuroses, and you have somehow been involved in it.” Soon after, September 21, he announced to his friend: “I want to confide in you immediately the great secret that has been slowly dawning on me in the last few months. I no longer believe in my neurotica [his seduction theory].” He gave as one explanation, “the surprise that in all cases, the father, not excluding my own, had to be accused of being perverse.” In the next letter, October 3, he wrote confidently that in the case of his own neurosis, “the old man plays no active part.” Finally, October 15, he referred to the Oedipus story:
“A single idea of general value dawned on me. I have found, in my own case too, [the phenomenon of] being in love with my mother and jealous of my father, and I now consider it a universal event in early childhood.”
Narcissists assume everyone is like them, nobody may experience life differently (key to critical theory) and the Jewish temperament never ceases to amaze with its grandiosity.
As always, it starts with a deadbeat.
Balmary and Krüll bring in the equation a recent biographical discovery of Jacob Freud’s less than perfect behavior; a forgotten second wife named Rebecca, who mysteriously disappears, possibly by suicide, at the time of Jacob’s marriage with his third wife, the beautiful Amelia Nathansohn, half his age and already pregnant of Sigmund (a fact Jacob tried to conceal by falsifying Sigmund’s date of birth). In light of post-Freudian developments in transgenerational depth-psychology, it is possible that Freud had from early age an intuitive sense of a “hidden fault of the father” linked to his own identity, which may have combined with memories of his father’s sexual abuse on himself and his brother and sisters.
The only true pansexual is, like the rapist god Pan, a pedophile.
During his self-analysis at the age of 40, the whole thing came knocking at the door of his consciousness, but he finally surrendered to the subconscious imperative to “close the eyes.” To cover-up the menacing truth of his father’s faults, Freud invented the Oedipus complex, charging children themselves of “polymorphous perversion.”
“What was the girl in Rotherham wearing?”
Classic predator behaviour.
Chastise people in the First World for being free, especially if white.
Thus, in the complete myth, Oedipus’ predestination to kill his father and marry his mother is not determined by his own impulses, but by the fault of his father. For Balmary, Freud’s ignorance of this part of the myth reveals and symbolizes his own blind spot, his failure to discover the secret guilt of the father—both his own father and, by consequence, the fathers of his neurotic and hysterical patients.
Neither Masson not Balmary deal with the Jewish aspect of the issue. Marianne Krüll hints that the father’s mandate to “close the eyes” was a question of “filial piety on which, ultimately, the entire Jewish tradition is based” (Krüll, p. 178), but, although Jewish herself, she does not insist on that aspect.
An aspect of all shitty societies – Chinese oppression, Muslim abuse, Jewish abuse….
How about don’t be a shithead to your kids? How about that?
In other words, comments Cuddihy, Freud “proposes a theory to explain the play’s power over him and to make ‘intelligible’ why he should identify so deeply with its hero, Oedipus. It is in the course of that effort that the core of the theory of psychoanalysis is born.”
Rationalization. Absolute bullshit dressed up in fancy words.
Americans continue this tradition to this day and your replication suffers because of it.
bears an uncanny resemblance with another story that had made a lasting impression on Freud a few years earlier, as he explained in The Interpretation of Dreams. This is a story that his father, a shtetl Jew from Moravia—where Sigmund was born—, had told him when he was ten or twelve years old,
“to show how much better things were now than they had been in his days. ‘When I was a young man,’ he said, ‘I went for a walk one Saturday in the streets of your birthplace; I was well dressed, and had a new cap on my head. A Christian came up to me and with a single blow knocked off my cap into the mud and shouted: ‘Jew! get off the pavement!’ ‘And what did you do?’ I asked. ‘I went into the roadway and picked up my cap,’ was his quiet reply. This struck me as unheroic conduct on the part of the big, strong man who was holding the little boy by the hand.
Bluffing is huge.
Glibness of a psychopath, call it what you will.
“Freud presumably experienced not only this rage and shame, but guilt about the rage and shame. He quickly ‘censored’ these unacceptable feelings, unacceptable to a dutiful son ostensibly proud of his father; he ‘repressed’ them. Years later he encounters Sophocles’ tragedy and it lays a spell on him.”
According to Cuddihy, the supposedly universal “Oedipus Complex” that Freud thought he discovered was in reality the veil of a characteristically Jewish complex of his time.
..we can appreciate how Cuddihy draws attention to the fact that Freud’s father—the father whom he felt compelled to exculpate, but toward whom he nevertheless experienced a murder wish—was a Jewish father recently immigrated from Yiddishland into the heart of European civilization.
And so the gamma self-destruction takes down the locals.
Most “psychoanalysis” is just bitchy stuff a gamma would come up with.
Literally “your mom” tier. Gaslighting a whole society.
Pathologizing the enemy like Communism did later….
In the preface for the Hebrew translation of Totem and Taboo, for example, asking himself rhetorically what is Jewish in his work, Freud answered: “a very great deal, and probably its very essence.” In a speech prepared for delivery at the B’nai B’rith Lodge in Vienna in 1926, Freud explained his motivation for joining thirty years earlier (1897):
“Whenever I have experienced feelings of national exaltation, I have tried to suppress them as disastrous and unfair, frightened by the warning example of those nations among which we Jews live.
integration is a myth yo
it’s fake news
But there remained enough to make the attraction of Judaism and the Jews irresistible, many dark emotional powers all the stronger the less they could be expressed in words, as well as the clear consciousness of an inner identity, the familiarity of the same psychological structure. … So I became one of you.”
birds of a feather
This statement is an excellent illustration of what Cuddihy calls “the ordeal of civility,” the struggle of every Jew who wishes to assimilate yet feels unable to overcome the “dark emotional powers” of his ancestral Jewishness, with its implicit imperative not to assimilate. Jewishness has much to do with what Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy calls those “invisible loyalties” that can bind a person to his ancestors, by an irresistible system of values, obligations and debts. The question is to what extent Freud’s psychoanalytical theory is the result of Freud’s surrender to those “dark emotional powers.”
We must take Freud seriously when he tells us, in The Interpretation of Dreams, that his own Jewishness took the form of an identification with Hannibal, and the fantasy of “taking vengeance on the Romans.” He went on to say:
“I myself had walked in Hannibal’s footsteps … Hannibal, with whom I had achieved this point of similarity, had been my favourite hero during my years at the Gymnasium; … Moreover, when I finally came to realize the consequences of belonging to an alien race, and was forced by the anti-Semitic feeling among my classmates to take a definite stand, the figure of the Semitic commander assumed still greater proportions in my imagination. Hannibal and Rome symbolized, in my youthful eyes, the struggle between the tenacity of the Jews and the organization of the Catholic Church. The significance for our emotional life which the anti-Semitic movement has since assumed helped to fix the thoughts and impressions of those earlier days. Thus the desire to go to Rome has in my dream-life become the mask and symbol for a number of warmly cherished wishes, for whose realization one had to work with the tenacity and single-mindedness of the Punic general, though their fulfillment at times seemed as remote as Hannibal’s life-long wish to enter Rome.”
The significance of this public confession, printed in 1899 for all the world to read, cannot be overestimated. Here Freud names as the driving force in his life the fantasy of entering Rome (the Christian world) and destroying it to avenge the Phoenicians (the Jews).
Wait, weren’t the Phoenicians practicing Satanic orgies, child rape and cannibalism?
It was a Babylon mystery cult, wasn’t it? There were so many it’s hard to keep up.
God destroys it over and over for a reason!
If Freud was deeply influenced by his Jewish background, so were the other founding members of the psychoanalytical movement. Dennis Klein writes in Jewish Origins of the Psychoanalytic Movement:
“From its beginning in 1902 to 1906, all 17 members were Jewish. The full significance of this number lies again in the way their viewed themselves, for the analysts were aware of their Jewishness and frequently maintained a sense of Jewish purpose and solidarity. … this feeling of positive Jewish pride formed the matrix of the movement in the psychoanalytic circle: As a spur to renewed independence, it tightened the bond among the members and powered their self-image of a redemptive elite.”
The exception is Carl Jung, whom Freud named president of the International Psychoanalytical Association in 1910 precisely to deflect the reproach that psychoanalysis was a “Jewish science.” Interestingly, Jung is the only member who never subscribed to Freud’s theory of infantile sexuality. In response to a letter by Karl Abraham, who complained that “Jung seems to be reverting to his former spiritualistic inclinations,” Freud explained : “it is really easier for you than it is for Jung to follow my ideas, for … you stand nearer to my intellectual constitution because of racial kinship (Rassenverwandtschaft).” Freud asked Abraham not to antagonize Jung because “it was only by his appearance on the scene that psychoanalysis escaped the danger of becoming a Jewish national affair.”
In contrast to Jung, Abraham was the most zealot supporter of Freud’s theory of infantile sexuality. In The History of the Psychoanalytic Movement, 1919, Freud wrote that, “The last word in the question of traumatic etiology was later on said by Abraham, when he drew attention to the fact that just the peculiar nature of the child’s sexual constitution enables it to provoke sexual experiences of a peculiar kind, that is to say, traumas” (self-inflicted traumas, so to speak). Freud was referring to a 1907 paper by Abraham, “The Experiencing of Sexual Trauma as a Form of Sexual Activity.” It is perhaps significant that Abraham, son of an Orthodox rabbi, was also the most ethnocentric of Freud’s disciples. He wrote in 1913 an essay “On Neurotic Exogamy,” diagnosing Jewish men who say they “could never marry a Jewess” with a neurosis resulting from “disappointed incestuous love.”
In the 1890s, Freud’s clientele was drawn exclusively from the Jewish middle class. Imagine if Freud’s seduction theory had earned him the recognition he craved for: although he disguised the identity of his patients in his case studies, it would not have been long before his work was attacked, not just as “Jewish science,” but as evidence of the depravity of Jewish mores.
But then Hollywood/porn/brothels proved everybody wrong!
. Anything contradicting this superiority creates a cognitive dissonance which is overcome by denial.
superiority complex, like the guys who go on and on and on about how ‘stupid’ women are… but not so stupid as to be tricked into going out with them, interestingly…
Denial means projection: to protect the dirty secret of child abuse in Jewish families—including his own—, Freud projected an imaginary repressed infantile perversion on all mankind. Projection, in turn, means inversion: Freud’s close disciple Otto Rank claimed that Jews had a more primitive, and therefore more healthy sexuality than Gentiles (Rank, “The Essence of Judaism,” 1905). Freudians and Freudo-Marxists have systematically denounced Christian civilization as suffering from sexual repression.
Women who don’t want to be sluts and love their husband are “frigid”, a type of sexual insanity according to Jews.
It just so happens those therapists wanted to bone them.
According to Wilhelm Reich, anti-Semitism is itself a symptom of sexual frustration, and could be cured by sexual liberation (The Mass Psychology of Fascism, 1934)—an improvement from Leo Pinsker’s theory that Judeophobia was a “hereditary” and “incurable” “disease transmitted for two thousand years.”
“We’re all equal but you can’t question us”.
Pull the other one.
In order to understand the psychological background of this Reichian messianic mission to cure the Christian West, and in order to see more clearly the projective nature of the psychoanalytical theory of repression, it is helpful to know the personal story of Wilhelm Reich, which reads as a caricature of Freud’s: At ten years old, when he realized that his mother was having an affair with his tutor, the young Wilhelm thought of blackmailing his mother into having sex with him. Eventually, he confided in his father about his mother’s adultery. In 1910, after a period of beatings from his father, his mother committed suicide, for which Reich blamed himself.
Well… yeah. You can see why they hate Darwin to this day and all theories that extend from it, including Trivers parental investment (a purely K-theory).
Faithful fathers are biologically more successful, mathematically. It’s been proven.
The “spread your wild oats” bullshit is Jewish, similar to the ‘frigid’ rhetoric, as is the “quantity over quality” fallacy applied to men who deadbeat their children (note the Jews themselves do not do this?). It’s been debunked.
Child psychology has also shown since the outcomes of abandoned children to be poorer across the board (physically, mentally, financially) so anyone pushing that “men are supposed to be slutty” bullshit is either stupid or certainly thinks you are.
It’s literally bullshit peddled by Victorian Jews to seduce Christian wives.
And naturally, they cannot appeal to Darwin on the subject of sterile sex, it’s a false equivalence, they’re not having real sex (reproductive) and manwhores are functionally homosexual.
Nobody tells them this but it’s known. Well accepted.
They have the same disease risks, fertility issues, impotence performance, porn addiction and everything.
Well, the circumcision link goes into some of it.
“Adult circumcision appears to result in worsened erectile function”
They can’t even really get it up, perform and keep it up to satisfy women. They don’t even like adult, round breasts, small waists proportionately (not athletic or anorexic), with broad hips and pubic hair that make nubile women, nubile. Secondary sexual characteristics dictate sexuality, and with it fertility.
The r-select category is not hetero-specific, they’re on that half of the spectrum. It’s a series of acts and vices, including a preference for only sterile sex. Arguably, such men are functionally virgins. They’ve never engaged in the reproductive act with a fertile female human. Only chemical crones. Which they expect all women to be, or become repulsed by those women. Functionally homosexual.
The Jewish and Muslim obsession with anal is explained:
The remaining prepuce and any remaining portions of the frenulum can be preferentially stimulated by masturbation and oral sex, whereas the sensation of deep pressure dominates during hetero- sexual coitus. The imbalance from not having the input from the missing fine touch receptors may make the experience less satisfying, causing a man with an incomplete penis to supplement his sexual experiences with other forms of stimulation.
And who in society has the tightest arsehole?
Evil people have reasons.
Ancient societies only celebrated a figure like Zeus because all his coitus was fruitful. That’s what made it divine instead of a sin.
Notice nobody dared boff Hera?
And nobody just did oral (or ANY oral) with him, he practiced ‘anal’ on nobody. Those were considered immoral by the king of the pantheon of PAGAN gods, yet how many fake pagans push those things as pagan? How many creepy gay rapists in particular?
The things we’re desensitized to now, post-WW2, would’ve horrified actual pagans.
His responsibility was to reproduce, it had F-all to do with orgasm. The psychiatrists lie.
It wasn’t even about him and neither the ‘sex’ (so sometimes rape) but about being the Patriarch, the Father, the genetic legacy.
Hence the expression “the embrace of a God is always fruitful”.
’embrace’ meant carnal knowledge
and why Aphrodite was considered a virgin goddess, since she had zero children
how could the inspiration of the concept lust act upon herself?
she can’t embrace herself, and everyone else was fruitful
that was her sacrifice, having no children of her own but inspiring others in a time when few humans were around
within Jewish thinking, saving the nations and destroying them are not two sides of the same coin, but one and the same, because what nations are supposed to be cured of is their very identity (their gods, in biblical terms). According to Andrew Heinze, author of Jews and the American Soul, Jews have shaped “American ideas about the mind and soul” with the preoccupation “to purge the evils they associated with Christian civilization.” It really started with Freud. In September 1909, invited to give a series of lectures in New England, Freud jokingly asked his companions, Sandor Ferenczi and Carl Jung: “Don‘t they know we’re bringing them the plague?” An extraordinary statement for a medical doctor pretending to have found a “cure” for neurosis. And a prophetic one: Freudism became a justification for a sexual “liberation” that can be seen in retrospect as a massive sexual abuse of the youth.
Kinsey picked it up.
That man is possessed.
You cannot convince me otherwise.
By a stunning coincidence, Freud was initiated into the recently founded B’nai B’rith in September 1897, precisely the time of his conversion to the dogma of infantile sexuality.
..He recruited at least three members and in 1901 was a founding father of a second lodge in Vienna, the Harmony Lodge. The same year, he gave a talk on “Goals and Purposes of the B’nai B’rith Societies.” Freud often presented his work to the B’nai B’rith before publishing it. In this respect, writes Klein, the Viennese B’nai B’rith lodge “was a precursor of the movement of psychoanalysis.” “After his death in 1939, the B’nai B’rith of Vienna continued, relentlessly, the support granted during his lifetime to the famous ‘brother.’”
To what extent were the B’nai B’rith masonic meetings influential in Freud’s swing from the seduction theory to the Oedipus theory? No one can say. However, we can hold as fairly certain that Freud’s membership in the B’nai B’rith was influential in his becoming one of the major intellectual stars and gurus of modernity.
It could easily be argued that, in matters of psychology, every sensible thing that Freud said had been said before him, and that almost everything he said that hadn’t been said before has been proven wrong.
A Jewish plagiarist, why repeat yourself?
So why did Freud become so famous? The long answer is that Freud benefitted from the same kind of communication networking that produced many other Jewish intellectual “geniuses”, and made French novelist André Gide comment in 1914 (in his diary) about “this tendency to constantly emphasize the Jew, … this predisposition to recognizing in him talent, even genius” The shorter answer to the question above is: B’nai B’rith. I will not suggest that the B’nai B’rith supported Freud’s Oedipus theory because they saw its potential for the moral corruption of the West. Nor do I suggest that the B’nai B’rith and Freud conspired to ruin Western civilization with the pestilential idea of infantile sexuality. But I do suggest that, had Freud maintained his earlier conviction in the reality of the abuses suffered by his Jewish patients, he would not have received as much support.
Muh superior IQ, just don’t remove the verbal section we added and never ever control for class and education!
In 1913, the B’nai B’rith created the Anti-Defamation League to save the life and the reputation of Leo Frank, the wealthy young president of the Atlanta chapter of B’nai B’rith, who was convicted of the rape and murder of Mary Phagan, a thirteen-year-old girl working in his pencil factory. The evidence for Frank’s guilt was overwhelming, but tremendous financial resources were deployed for his legal defense—including false testimonies—and an intense publicity was orchestrated in the news media, with the New York Times devoting enormous coverage to the case. I quote from Ron Unz’s article:
“For almost two years, the nearly limitless funds deployed by Frank’s supporters covered the costs of thirteen separate appeals on the state and federal levels, including to the U.S. Supreme Court, while the national media was used to endlessly vilify Georgia’s system of justice in the harshest possible terms. Naturally, this soon generated a local reaction, and during this period outraged Georgians began denouncing the wealthy Jews who were spending such enormous sums to subvert the local criminal justice system. … All appeals were ultimately rejected and Frank’s execution date for the rape and murder of the young girl finally drew near. But just days before he was scheduled to leave office, Georgia’s outgoing governor commuted Frank’s sentence, provoking an enormous storm of popular protest, especially since he was the legal partner of Frank’s chief defense lawyer, an obvious conflict of interest. … A few weeks later, a group of Georgia citizens stormed Frank’s prison farm, abducting and hanging him, with Frank becoming the first and only Jew lynched in American history.”
Lynch mobs don’t form for nothing.
If the courts are corrupt, mob justice prevails.
Thanks to the mobilization of the Jewish power elite—“as one man”—, Leo Frank has been turned from a convicted pedophile and child murderer into a martyr of anti-Semitism. We don’t know what Freud thought of the case, but there is an obvious resonance between his “assault on truth” and the B’nai B’rith’s. If young Mary Phagan had visited a Freudian psychoanalyst before her atrocious death, and complained of her boss’ sexual overtures, she probably would have been told about her own “penis envy”; had she protested, she would have been told that her protest proved her sexual repression—exactly as happened to Freud’s patient Dora, Ida Bauer by her real name, an eighteen-year-old girl suffering from hysterical symptoms.
“She really wanted it” – Jewish creeps from Freud to Weinstein.
“She secretly wanted it” – Jewish psychoanalysis and rapists everywhere.
I’ve never met a woman who’d part with her clitoris for any sum of money, but I’ve met plenty of men who expressed envy of them and their nerve density, who’d happily trade their penis. Especially if they know about the possibility of multiple orgasms… the mind boggles at such a castrating obsession.
There’s also the repulsive womb envy of men literally so effeminate they want to birth their own children as its sole parent in pods like a pozzed transsexual. They want to birth their own child outside the mother (spiting the child its birthright to a mother, evil) but are too chickenshit to go through the agony personally.
Why oh WHY can’t they find any woman who wants to breed with them? A mystery, truly.
But the fact that Freud’s Jewish disciples all discovered the same impulse, and that Freudism became so widely accepted by Jews, suggests that Freud’s generalization was not without merit. It only suffered from the tendency of Jewish intellectuals to project Jewish issues on all humankind. The child’s repressed wish to kill his father is not universally human, but may be characteristically Jewish. For the Jewish father is the guardian of Jewishness and the representative of the Jewish god. And every Jew aspires in the depth of his soul to free himself from Yahweh, the archetypal abusive and castrating Father.
And so the secret wish to murder the Jewish father is also a secret wish for the death of the Jewish god.
You had ten rules to follow.
Ten rules and you fucked it up.
It is therefore identical with the so-called “Jewish self-hatred” that Theodor Lessing saw as affecting every Jew without exception: “There is not a single man of Jewish blood in whom cannot be detected at least the beginning of Jewish self-hatred.”
the whiny self-pity and projection of blame to anyone who listens
By choosing a Greek myth as a metaphor for his theory, Freud was projecting on Gentiles a Jewish problem. Had he recognized the Jewish overtone of the complex,
he might have called it the “Isaac complex,” since Isaac is the son that Abraham was willing to slaughter.
The expression “Isaac complex” has actually been used by French heterodox psychoanalystJean-Pierre Fresco,
…Kafka describes the devastating effect on his personality of a father whose means of education were “abuse, threats, irony, spiteful laughter, and—oddly enough—self-pity.”
Maybe some BPD, a lot of Jewish men are borderline symptomatic. The identity issues, compulsive lying and adultery are characteristic.
…After the death of Gregor appears his sister Grete, his double in the other sex, the homosexualized son….
Also introduces kafkatrapping. If you accept or deny you are oppressed/repressed/abused, you were because of that! Gaslight.
The paternal prohibition of emancipation through marriage is linked to an incestuous domination that becomes clear when Georg submissively proposes to the father to exchange beds.
Marrying evil women is bad goyim, love your father who hates you…. forever….
They also claim sex is about power, so by putting white men off marriage and becoming Patriarchs, who gains in power? Who loses?
Rape isn’t about power either, sadists literally enjoy pain and humiliation.
You can’t fake humiliation.
….this uncomprehensible and omnipotent slanderer-accuser-judge is “the palimpsest of an archaic Abrahamic father unconsciously introjected as an archaic and sadistic superego, and turned into an inner persecutor.”
Whiny Jews make for shitty literature.
The victim mentality is absurd.
Who’d read that?
…..while his Jewish literary critics consider him quintessentially Jewish. “By common consent,” said Harold Bloom, “Kafka is not only the strongest modern Jewish writer, but the Jewish writer.”(Hence Israel’s decade-long legal battle to secure his autograph manuscripts as national treasure.) Who is right, of Kafka and his critics? Does his genius come from his being Jewish, or from his having a psychopathic father? Obviously, it is impossible to distinguish the two factors, because the psychopathic father happens to be Jewish; he is, in Fresco’s terms, the typical “Abrahamic father.” But are not all Jewish fathers Abrahamic in the measure of their Jewishness? Is not the Jewish god a psychopathic father—and the psychopathic father a Jewish god?
This might be why God punishes you, this bullshit.
Divine punishment happens because you broke the rules, you know them.
Thou shalt not adulterate, thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not worship idols like money…
There’s a psychopathic inability to learn from ‘mistakes’, typical of the low IQ.
The key lock, poor analogy is pure psychopath. They see all humans as objects to be broken.
Their emotional circumcision is showing.
Had Freud preserved his original insight into the psychological damage of sexual abuse on children, he might have eventually reflected on the impact of neonatal circumcision. But he has been rather discreet on the subject—though he didn’t have his own sons circumcised.
He actually loved them?
In New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, he speculated that “during the human family’s primeval period, castration used to be carried out by a jealous and cruel father upon growing boys,” and that “circumcision, which so frequently plays a part in puberty rites among primitive people, is a clearly recognizable relic of it.” Freud went further in Moses and Monotheism:
“Circumcision is a symbolical substitute of castration,
not symbolic, surgical and the modern kind takes far more than ancient, which might’ve (probably) just been a small notch into the foreskin, removing nothing (and explaining survival rates)
a punishment which the primeval father dealt his sons long ago out of the awfulness of his power, and whosoever accepted this symbol showed by so doing that he was ready to submit to his father’s will, although it was at the cost of a painful sacrifice.”
and the trauma of a pain only recently studied
Interestingly, Freud originally got that idea from Sandor Ferenczi, who had written in an article that greatly impressed Freud, that circumcision is “a means of inspiring terror, a symbol of castration by the father.”
A psychopath’s envy of their same-sex child, envy of their youth.
and cult indicator of obedience, obvi
Given the Jewish undercurrent in Freud’s intellectual biography, it is reasonable to assume that his inability to deal with the issue of Jewish neonatal circumcision is connected to his refusal to face the devastating reality of child abuse. Isn’t the first abuse suffered by every Jewish male from the part of his parents and kins, circumcision on the eighth day? It physically impresses on every Jew, and on all Jews collectively, the traumatic domination of Yahweh and his Covenant.
implying removing body parts (male prepuce) was indicated in Genesis, which it was not
The psychological impact of neonatal circumcision, performed without anesthesia and causing unbearable pain, has been studied by Professor Ronald Goldman, author of Circumcision, the Hidden Trauma. His research shows a disturbance in the mother-child bonding process after the ritual.
Notice these women never want their own prepuce removed as adults? Nor their precious daughters.
No wonder Jews are such famed misogynists.
“I don’t feel I can recover from it. […] We had this beautiful baby boy and seven beautiful days and this beautiful rhythm starting, and it was like something had been shattered! … When he was first born there was a tie with my young one, my newborn. And when the circumcision happened, in order to allow it I had to cut off the bond. I had to cut off my natural instincts, and in doing so I cut off a lot of feelings towards Jesse. I cut it off to repress the pain and to repress the natural instinct to stop the circumcision.”
That isn’t holy, that’s Moloch. A woman-hating fake deity would want to break up the family bonding.
It’s like all the politicians suspiciously into ‘golf’ at courses with tunnels. Duh?
The unnatural incestuous wish that Freud and his Jewish male disciples discovered in their repressed unconscious could perhaps be explained as a result of the inhibition in mother-child bonding caused by the trauma of neonatal circumcision.
R-type blame shift.
A trauma caused at this age has little chance to ever be brought back into consciousness and be healed.
But infant pain is considered a great occult tool by Satanists, even to grant wishes (second is orgy rape). It’s also a portal for possession of the infant by sinful spirits.
Hey, I didn’t make their rules. I’m the messenger.
It’s like rapists going for easy prey in drunk women (alcohol is the most common rape drug) because the wolf will go for the hobbling sheep first.
More research is perhaps needed on the possible link between Jewish circumcision and the fact, according to the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia, that “the Jews are more subject to diseases of the nervous system than the other races and peoples among which they dwell.”
Research done by sociologist Leo Srole in 1962 showed that the rate of neuroses and character disorders among Jews was about three times as high as among Catholics and Protestants.
In The Future of an Illusion, Sigmund Freud describes “religion”—meaning essentially Christianity—as a “universal obsessional neurosis” which has for believers the merit that “their acceptance of the universal neurosis spares them the task of constructing a personal one.”
If you hadn’t figured it out yet. Nihilism is Jewish.
Living isn’t something most people hate, Freud.
With a similar approach, Judaism can be described as a “collective sociopathy.” This does not mean that “the Jews” are sociopaths, but rather that, in proportion to the degree of their identification as Jews, they are victims of a sociopathic mindset patterned from the Tanakh, “marked in their flesh” (impressed traumatically in their subconscious) by circumcision, and fuel by their elites with the paranoia of anti-Semitism. The difference between collective sociopathy and individual sociopathy is the same as between collective neurosis and individual neurosis according to Freud: participation in a collective sociopathic mentality allows members of the community to channel sociopathic tendencies toward the outside of the community, and to maintain inside a high degree of sociability.
We’re their punching bag. That’s why they move to white areas.
White people are the Jewish scapegoat.
Of particular note is when they call him a ‘homophobe’ for quoting factual political references to pedophilia.
Plus randomly “you do not care about trans people lives”.
Yeah but factually neither do they, having a high rate of HIV and trying to ‘trap’ men, sexual predation.
Morals are not relative and ‘consent’ has nothing to do with good and evil.
That’s a dangerous one, that ‘professor’, never tells you his opinion.
Professor is the new preacher but they are God, they tell you what is good.
Appeal to Foucault, you’re still the one saying it. He even pronounced it wrong.
The more prosecutions, the better.
They’re oddly silent on this stuff. What a brave, brave man.
It sounds like they’re covering for rapists by calling all victims instantly liars.
Well, men and children have been raped, did they ‘ask for it’?
And the misogynists who claim that about white women and girls are EXACTLY like the social workers aiding and abetting Muslim sex slavery rings. It’s the same rhetoric!!!
Don’t be pro-pedo, don’t be pro-rape, don’t be anti-white. This should be easy.
It’s strange how these virulent, bitter misogynists pretend to be against all other degeneracy. No, they just want control of your women, in your country and family (look at their claims what they’d do in SHTF – literally steal your female children at gunpoint, aka they are pedos). They hide behind a screen pretending to be white to make white men feel like protecting us is pointless (the abuse tactic of instilling hopelessness in whites) and also because most of them (over 75%) are non-white (so hate us as a group) but feel entitled to rape white women. Do not fall for it.
They don’t call for the rape of non-white women, do they?
They don’t rail against the Muslims raping their own sons and daughters, do they?
They don’t want pedos and rapists with clear forensic evidence (or multiple cases) to be held accountable like adults and castrated or shot, do they?
What a coincidence.
Muh appeal to exception meets Muh dick.
Normal people want rapists executed, especially rapists of virgins. There’s also the hate crime element of targeting whites, women and especially Christians, as gangs do.
Normal people want to heavily punish the gangs who sell rape drugs and the people who drug/poison future rape victims.
Normal people think pedos and other sexual predators are subhuman and have no excuses to behave like animals.
The people who you naively think ‘get it’ just have no empathy and conscience for white people, starting with but not ending AT (as seen above) the female white population.
It’s slippery slope with these people. You allow them (and they are misogynists, but notably only anti-white misogynists – wake up) – if you allow them to praise rapists of women and little girls, they feel safer praising the rape of men and little boys some time later because most rapists will go for anything with a hole. That’s why they’re rapists. That’s why they get caught with animals and corpses.
Did Marilyn seduce the morgue workers? This ‘evil = woman’ rhetoric is Orthodox Jew and Muslim, it has no place among Christians. The hypoagency of the low IQ is evil. Pure evil.
I’ll believe Q isn’t full of shit when Clooney is locked up, ideally before his POTUS bid.
Official justice or mob justice. If the former fails…..
Sexual predators, like all predators, go to the path of least resistance, to the groups least protected. Whites must resist as one or we’re done for.
Why do you think Hollywood gets along eerily well, freaks of all stripes and perversions? Yet they hate white people? Why? What’s the missing logic here?
What aren’t you told?
Divide and conquer. If rape is okay to group A, then it’s okay to group B, then C, then D….
You’re on their list.
Brave New World style. Anyone who wants you must be sexually served. Weakening your ingroup loyalty to your women is the start. Alienated, the women become careerists, since the young men refuse to found families in the stability of marriage. They say we should ‘fight off’ rapists but know we lack the strength and hey, they banned guns! Why is rape in Europe a problem? Well, we have no guns! We can’t carry pepper spray!
Hollywood puts out misogynistic shit only to white men about white women:
Every time you hear an anti-woman joke, note the race of the speaker and the implied race of the woman he’s envisaging. It becomes horrifically obvious. ‘Lad culture’ tanked the birth rate, nuked it from orbit.
Yes, become a childless alcoholic, male Bridget Joneses’, you need a wife like a fish needs a bicycle!
We have ugly, fat middle-class men on stages in jeans and t-shirt as ‘comedians’ pretending to be regular, working-class ‘lads’ talking the same shit as the SJWs, ultimately. And they fall for it. They pay for it. The same three jokes: women are emotional, my stupid wife, I hate my kids.
Why don’t I jangle keys at you for an hour, it’s less insulting. Have you ever counted this? Watch any TV comedy special with one of these cuntmuffins. The same three anti-natal points again and again, overt propaganda.
Same stage as this shit:
He literally incites murder of white/ginger people to a room of white people and they laugh and clap like seals.
Shit joke 3: I hate my kids.
The feeling’s mutual because you’re a weak man.
They’re allowed on the stage because they’re the enemy. Al Murray was a character to mock you.
Shit jokes 1 & 2:
Mad Men was successful while Don Draper lived the 50s lifestyle but he literally left the perfect housewife. Wake up.
Why are gays recently complaining that there aren’t enough young men sexually available to them? Huh? And how young do they wanna go? Why is gay culture a cult of extreme youth?
or suicide attempt?
Psychopaths (as narcissists) have a risk of suicide far lower than the normal population.
Those dead eyes.
They really can’t hide the Stein as they age, can they?
Also cartoonish features.
A source familiar with the situation told the Guardian that Epstein had allegedly been attacked.
Q or Q+?
Italians are reeling from the revelation that a crime ring, which includes a mayor, doctors and social workers, had been brainwashing children to say their parents abused them, so as to easily sell them on to foster families.
It’s still trafficking, whether or not Jolie’s doing it. Actually, especially then.
Better life was the excuse for all slavery ever – no.
and genocide, see e)
So far eighteen people, including the mayor of the town of Bibbiano, near Reggio Emilia in northern Italy, have been arrested.
They were suspected of working together to brainwash the kids, who were taken from disadvantaged families under false pretexts, into believing they’d been abused at home. This was later used as a justification to seize the children and, basically, to sell them to foster parents at a high price.
Stealing from the poor and working class, likely for Satanic orgy rape or something on par with the ‘King’s’ purple baths. Why weren’t the McCanns thrown in prison? Why keep the other kids? They were middle class, hence protected.
The psychologists at the Hansel and Gretel Association in the town of Moncalieri, near Turin, have used a variety of bizarre techniques to achieve their sinister goal.
They relied on persuasion to make their victims believe that their parents hurt and sexually abused them; showed fake, childlike drawings with added sexual details and even enacted plays, dressing up in scary masks to represent their moms and dads as being vile and dangerous…. The people to whom the boys and girls were handed over reportedly included sex shop owners, persons with psychological disorders and parents whose children had committed suicide. It was under this ‘foster care’ that at least two of the victims suffered actual sexual abuse, according to reports.
The criminal organization was busted by police as part of an operation codenamed “Angels and Demons,” which was launched in late summer 2018 after an unnaturally high number of child sex abuse reports were spotted as coming from an area in the Reggio Emilia province. Those arrested, as well as 27 others under investigation, have been charged with mistreatment of minors, violence, abuse of office, fraud and falsifying public records.
Our own Parliament admitted social workers have lied on record, same people who tell sex slave rape victims they were ‘asking for it’ and leave them to sleep outside in the cold on park benches, telling others they were hookers.
they won’t leave us the fuck alone
They’re looking at these people and thinking “get away from me, you fucking freak”.
h/t Anonymous Conservative
The Left are anti-Darwin nutjobs.
I know two teen brothers (one is now 19 and the other 18) but I spoke to them about two years ago and they were both disgusted and honestly taken aback by what they saw at Pride in San Diego.
They were both open minded guys and very pro LGBT people. They don’t see why anyone should care what others are doing or who they love as long as it’s not hurting anyone. That was until they went to SD Pride to support as a 17 and 16 year old. They said they saw men with their cocks out in public while holding kids hands, guys rubbing each other off in front of kids, giving blow jobs in public or showing their holes etc. this blew their minds cause they thought this would just be LGBT people marching for their rights but they realized it’s just gay men being naked, being dirty and over sexual in public and intentionally showing as much skin as possible to people with kids etc. the older one was disgusted but didn’t let himself be too bothered but the younger one was truly bothered and after that said he would never go near a place like that and even started speaking against the “perverts” that are gays.
and child abuse
He means it too. He doesn’t hold back either and doesn’t care who he offends now because truth is he comes from money. He’s from a line of successful Texans and they’re rich. He could care less anymore when a few years ago he was someone who always stood up for LGBT.
This is why I always speak AGAINST the way gays act at Pride. It TURNS PEOPLE OFF. You aren’t doing any good. But you all refuse to see this and label it homophobia. It isn’t. Being civilized isn’t homophobic.
Exhibit A in why Americans will shoot the Boomers.
There’s too much of this at San Francisco Pride. These people shamelessly rub their dicks against people as they shove threw crowds. I usually leave once the BDSM people in their animal leather and latex gear show up in the parade. Why are they there? Keep that shit in the bedroom. It’s disturbing to look at and has nothing to do with LGBT pride.
Things like this suck, because I want to go to the parade. I like parades. But stuff like that just makes me want to avoid it like the plague.
Degenerates. The BDSM people are mostly either non-white or gay.
spot the r-type
Is this pride in SF? SF has a long history with public nudity and it’s kind of accepted as part of the city and festivities. Additionally “being naked around children in public” != “exposing yourself to children”. There’s not really a reason to hide casual, platonic nudity from children of any age. They’ve probably seen it before.
Now the naked guy that peed on me last year, I generally frown on that kind of nudity.
The public doesn’t consent to see nudity, ANY nudity.
Flashing is a fetish, they get a thrill out of forcing unwilling people to view them.
It’s a type of sexual sadism.
And literal truth
The addition of Trans and every other crazy after that is what is affecting gay rights. People can see the mental illness emanating from the alphabet soup. Two spirit ??? Gurl, you stole that from Native-American folk.
Needs to be surgical, however, and all rapists, considering criminal versatility this would reduce overall crime.
A new law will force pedophiles whose victims were under 13 to pay for their own castration before they’re released from jail. The HB 379 bill was signed by Alabama Governor Kay Ivey Wednesday after being introduced by Republican State Representative Steve Hurst. It will see child molesters undergo chemical castration, with drugs used to suppress their sexual urges. Anyone who refuses to do so will be considered in violation of their parole and kept in prison.
They want to let the pedos out, this is an excuse.
And lower age of consent to 13.
Explaining the reasoning behind the controversial proposal, Hurst told CBS42: ‘They have marked this child for life and the punishment should fit the crime. ‘I had people call me in the past when I introduced it and said don’t you think this is inhumane?
Forcing rape victims to carry to term is inhumane. The trauma of any rape victim is inhumane.
It’s discrimination based on age, this cannot be lawful.
The rapist clearly cannot be trusted to use their organ in a legal manner.
If there’s a way to do it surgically to female pedos, them too.
Everyone on the rapist’s side should be on some kinda list.
‘I asked them what’s more inhumane than when you take a little infant child, and you sexually molest that infant child when the child cannot defend themselves or get away, and they have to go through all the things they have to go through. ‘If you want to talk about inhumane – that’s inhumane.’
God didn’t say one rape was okay.
Half measures are evil.
Day before 13? Evil. Day after? Go ahead. WTF.
Rape victims in general cannot defend themselves, they tend to freeze, it’s been studied.
A total just world fallacy requiring telepathy, precognition and super strength.
Let’s leave him drunk in a bath-house and see if he can ‘get away’.
Sometimes people narrowly avoid it but they’re still traumatized and the predator is still a danger.
Hurst has also claimed that his bill could deter pedophiles from targeting children, and reduce the number of child sex offenses taking place.
Yeah make them target adult women and make rape babies.
A woman only deserves legal protection and sympathy prior to age 13, right?
Also, if they can control who they target, it’s fully intentional, premeditated predation and the cure is a rope.
But Alabama attorney Raymond Johnson is among those who oppose it. He thinks existing punishments are sufficient. Johnson explained: ‘They’re going to challenge it under the 8th Amendment Constitution. ‘They’re going to claim that it is cruel and unusual punishment for someone who has served their time and for the rest of there life have to be castrated.’
These people are subhuman and cannot be rehabilitated.
God never said such people could be pure, the sentence was death.
Sexual sadists are not fully human, the neuroscience is clear.
Castrate them – before they do it to you.