Video: Interview with a sex slave

Notice some themes. Pedophiles breeding children for these purposes. Involving the elite, to control them. Slavery and torture. Still referred to like prostitution (part of the reason it should be illegal, no excuse for these ‘owners’). She calls it ‘having sex’ when no consent was given i.e. rape. Typical of these cases.

They keep politely calling it trafficking – no. It’s slavery.

I’d be interesting to know how many of these slaves are white and how these evil people network.

The Sexual Revolution had nothing to do with politics

Because which sexual strategy would benefit from this?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/17/girl-aged-11-to-become-britains-youngest-mother
Plenty of outlets are covering this. I’m linking them because they report it like it’s a nice thing.
https://www.rt.com/uk/381135-pregnant-youngest-mother-girl/
The fornication is fine, it’s good for you goyim…
You’re definitely not going to Hell because we said so.

Call it right. Call it consensual, I fucking dare you.

Think rabbit, think-

Is the Left’s push of Sexual Revolution narratives a ploy to destroy age of consent?

All this Milo nonsense is raising questions.

Namely, why are they suddenly in shutdown, denial mode?

Was something, some legal challenge, brewing in the next victim group, rising?

When the likes of Salon did those pro-pedophilia articles?

reminder

http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-sexual-revolution-and-children-how-the-left-took-things-too-far-a-702679.html

I won’t go into detail on this … thing.

Monsters.

take it from M Greyland

Now for all well-meaning people who believe I am extrapolating from my experience to the wider gay community, I would like to explain why I believe this is so: From my experience in the gay community, the values in that community are very different: the assumption is that EVERYONE is gay and closeted, and early sexual experience will prevent gay children from being closeted, and that will make everyone happy.

everyone is damaged
useful excuse to an abuser
there is no rape
useful excuse for rapists

If you doubt me, research “age of consent” “Twinks,” “ageism” and the writings of the NUMEROUS authors on the Left who believe that early sexuality is somehow “beneficial” for children.

Anonymous outs pedophiles of the dark net

Ah, the real thing.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1159416/pg1

“Anonymous took down child porn sites on the dark web, they also took down many scam sites. Freedom Hosting was the target of Anonymous that said that 50% of over 10,000 sites were child porn.”

You can tell the real Anonymous because they have a sense of humour and don’t bloviate until after something is done.
Opsec.
Where do they get them?
“Social services, adoption services.”
Rotherham was one of many.
“Word. This is the only conspiracy I’ve ever seen get censored on the internet. There has been a lot of crazy stuff that has flown around, for some reason this topic is the unique one.”
“It’s time for Trump to declare war on child sex trafficking in this country. Force the entire House & Senate to back it…and watch who tries to refuse.”
Slavery. It’s the classic model.
Start with Michael Jackson. Yeah, the whole file, you know he had peepholes and secret cameras, currently rotting in Hell.

What kind of parent uses their child for money?

And internet attention, don’t forget that.

Dignity, for a price of a few likes.

http://stopadaliarosesmom.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/5-reasons-to-hate-adalias-mom.html

1. She doesn’t have a job, yet she is asking for donations. This is the one thing that makes me so mad at her mom. Her mom has a home, food & clothing. She can get a job unlike people on the streets who worry where their next hot meal will come from. Well I am saying she has stability. She can get a job and earn money for Adalia herself. But guess what she does instead? She posts pictures on Facebook exploiting her daughter & then beg for donations.

Note the race of the mother. I’m not surprised. You ever see a European pull this shit?

She’s dressing up her child in little outfits and parading her around like a dog.
Just get a tiny dog to humiliate, most of the bitches do.

I thought this was over years ago but no.

I can totally believe she’s still doing this, it’s sick.

They say about trolls online. The wrong kind.

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Adalia_Rose

Remember what I said about female trolling?

Female trolling is commonly finding a girl with an ugly face (mostly bone structure) or bad makeup and clothes, telling her those things look ‘sexy/stunning/gorgeous’ and then watching her repeat them.

Putting any photos of a child online is dodgy. Why continue to do this?
and I swear if I hear ‘raising awareness’… we have the internet, we’re already plenty aware

https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/1312411

understand that Adalia is cheerful and happy girl that inspires people but her mother is crossing the line.

It’s a special brand of cruelty to humiliate your own child for narcissistic supply.

I’m against her mom exposing her to the Internet.If this keeps up the only thing that will be left to remember Adalia when she passes away will be tons of offensive images.

There are certain women who keep deformed pregnancies, expressly to attention-seek.
They have groups and shockingly, petition other women to do it too because they refuse to believe nature makes error (well, that’s evolution, really). It’s grandiose to expect your own genome will always be superior to others when the child itself is doomed to suffer long and die slow. That kind of I’ll show you mentality.
Well, you can look up what they are. I’ll say no more on that count.
It isn’t the child’s fault. It’s completely the parents. The child is the victim, knows nothing else.

She’s just using her child to get money and get likes. It’s ridiculous. It’s growing tiresome, and I wish Fuckerberg would do something right for once and you know, stop it somehow. It’s annoying, it’s spam, and using it for profit. Isn’t like a rule or something somewhere on facebook where you can’t use it to make money?

the child probably does have exorbitant medical costs

You bred it. You buy it. Parenthood is an investment. If you can’t pay the price, don’t whine at others like a dependent.
It’s like those adverts where the child is clearly fine but standing in the middle of a large body of water with ruffled hair and a little smear of mud on their face, begging for money. I don’t know about America, but begging is illegal in this country, and should be illegal online too. Emotional blackmail is abuse and unhealthy for the bait too.

Children with conditions need a normal life, not a fake online one.

https://www.change.org/p/stop-natalia-from-exploiting-adalia-rose-this-is-made-to-stop-natalia-keep-on-exploiting-adalia

I don’t think that’ll go anywhere because the female trolls love to signal.
It’s like fainting couches. Who can write the most outrageous crap. Brings out the worst in my sex or I wouldn’t mention it.

Celebrity is bad enough for adults, it’s a curse. You know when this poor thing eventually dies, the mother will continue panning round instead of letting that narcissistic supply go. It’s disgusting to allow that behaviour. Medical matters aren’t fit for public consumption, children aren’t dolls to dress up and show off because your own selfies don’t get enough likes.

Where is the father in this? Are the parents married? I think you know the answers to these questions.

Post-Rotherham, white people distrust Labour, this is why

links h/t to Anonymous Conservative

Labour party.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/462604/We-can-t-prove-sex-with-children-does-them-harm-says-Labour-linked-NCCL

There is so much medical and psychiatric evidence of child abuse that at this point in time, anyone denying it is practically outing themselves as a pedophile. Life outcomes, suicide, these are not ‘relationships’ and consent is medical, so if anything it should be 18. Enforced rigorously.

“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”

Victim blaming. Why Rotherham happened. It was deliberate. It was a social experiment.

Lib Dem (basically). All the freaks and deviants in that one, they’re famous for it. You can look up various stories.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/681098/Paedophile-MP-Clement-Fraud-Madeleine-McCann-Kate-Gerry-Portugal

Almost as if they have a …Common Purpose.
Read UK Column people. Before it’s exposed, if ever.

Common Purpose could be nominated as the first SJWs, they are far, far Left on all matters degenerate and especially sexual. Animals? Fine. Kids? Whatever. Dead people? Clump of cells, nobody in there to consent or object. Even the acronym CP is also internet slang for child pr0n. Their symbol is an innocent little butterfly apparently.

I would write more but I am scared, truthfully, because they get to people. Anyone who speaks out openly, in public, you don’t really hear from again.

A lot of their fellow travellers are known to police, and travel openly, untouchable by national law because they’re rich and registered overseas.

They deserve the same treatment as the other kinds of rape gang. It makes me sick to share a city with these scum.

Meanwhile, the Tories toast to their glorious opposition’s stupidity in hiring a senile white man.

Jeremy Corbyn ridiculed by flood of memes after claiming ‘for all his flaws’ Fidel Castro was a social justice hero