Trump in Epstein’s Black Book

It went down the memory hole but recent cuckey events have made me ponder.

The PDF is on Gawker, of all places.
http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/trump-and-pedophilia-epstein-black-book/
Still yet to hear a convincing explanation for this.
A black book is a filter of the most important contacts.
I’d follow up on the actors, personally. The weakest links. Any scandals or hush-ups involving them.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1145556/pg1
I’m not going to say which one sticks out. Based on the thesp rumour mill.
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2780681/pg2
“It also depends if there was a ‘contact book’ and a 2nd ‘black book’.”
Very important, omitted information.
“Almost every big name libtard is on that list.”
A fluke, I’m sure.
I did hear the one I’m thinking of, among other embarassing tales, did gay porn at one point.
Not one you’d instantly suspect either. That’s why he hates the internet. The real reason. Probably terrified it’ll come out some day. A thing with Jolie did.
This particular list is deliberate, it’s a dox of something for sure.
“Everyone on that list that is someone very important, and knows they cannot be touched and don’t care”
“Some replies were sceptical that this client list was a general overall list of Epstein’s clients. Wrong, this particular list is specific to his seemingly pedophile clients and the butler who found this client list mysteriously died after this disclosure. Epstein was a billionaire and surely kept separate unique categorical black book lists according to the relationship with his clients ie investments etc. The butler attempted to sell this particular list and I believe was killed as a result by this exposure.”

Cross-reference children’s charities, the NGOs are smothered in child rape scandals.

Any celebrity should be desperate to clear their name.

Video: Interview with a sex slave

Notice some themes. Pedophiles breeding children for these purposes. Involving the elite, to control them. Slavery and torture. Still referred to like prostitution (part of the reason it should be illegal, no excuse for these ‘owners’). She calls it ‘having sex’ when no consent was given i.e. rape. Typical of these cases.

They keep politely calling it trafficking – no. It’s slavery.

I’d be interesting to know how many of these slaves are white and how these evil people network.

The Sexual Revolution had nothing to do with politics

Because which sexual strategy would benefit from this?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/17/girl-aged-11-to-become-britains-youngest-mother
Plenty of outlets are covering this. I’m linking them because they report it like it’s a nice thing.
https://www.rt.com/uk/381135-pregnant-youngest-mother-girl/
The fornication is fine, it’s good for you goyim…
You’re definitely not going to Hell because we said so.

Call it right. Call it consensual, I fucking dare you.

Think rabbit, think-

Is the Left’s push of Sexual Revolution narratives a ploy to destroy age of consent?

All this Milo nonsense is raising questions.

Namely, why are they suddenly in shutdown, denial mode?

Was something, some legal challenge, brewing in the next victim group, rising?

When the likes of Salon did those pro-pedophilia articles?

reminder

http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-sexual-revolution-and-children-how-the-left-took-things-too-far-a-702679.html

I won’t go into detail on this … thing.

Monsters.

take it from M Greyland

Now for all well-meaning people who believe I am extrapolating from my experience to the wider gay community, I would like to explain why I believe this is so: From my experience in the gay community, the values in that community are very different: the assumption is that EVERYONE is gay and closeted, and early sexual experience will prevent gay children from being closeted, and that will make everyone happy.

everyone is damaged
useful excuse to an abuser
there is no rape
useful excuse for rapists

If you doubt me, research “age of consent” “Twinks,” “ageism” and the writings of the NUMEROUS authors on the Left who believe that early sexuality is somehow “beneficial” for children.