Third world kids

Credit: That Guy T

It’s almost like they despise their own children.

Remember briefly a few years ago the trendies tried to stop cheap third world labour?
Like, why do you think we buy from there?

They stopped when the sticker price of the new fairtrade designs meant less lattes for Sally in accounting. They dropped it like a hot potato at a steakhouse.

Emma Watson is crying for a lost cause, people don’t want First World production standards. Banning child labour here just outsourced it to darker people. Is that really better?

MRAs for custody of rape babies

http://bust.com/feminism/193580-man-kidnaps-rapes-and-impregnates-12-year-old-girl-and-now-is-taking-her-to-court-for-custody.html

They never talk about these cases.

In September 2008, Christopher Mirasolo, 18 years old at the time, kidnapped three 12-13 year old girls for two days in a vacant house near his families property. He now has joint legal custody of a child conceived out of that rape. 

The Detroit News has been following this story, stating that one of Mirasolo’s initial victims discovered she was pregnant the same month he was convicted of rape. Mirasolo served only six months of his one year sentence for that incident, and in 2010 was later convicted of another child rape and served only four years of the 15 year sentence. Her family was told he only served 6 months because “first-time sex offenders weren’t sent to prison because people come out worse after they go there” and he needed to care for his sick mother.

Oh no, the rapist might get raped. Think of the criminal, won’t somebody please think of the criminal?

Now, he has been awarded joint custody of the baby boy the first victim has been raising since she was 13 years old — but how? Apparently, through some shady legal nonsense, he illegally got her address and claimed she consented to adding his name to the birth certificate.

12.
Consented. 12.
This is the company you keep.

Like forging documents approved by a minor makes you look any better?

Now, because his name is on the birth certificate, he has been granted joint custody, and given the ability to be active in his child’s and his victim’s life. The victim and her attorney insist this all started after aid she recieved from the state was being investigated – ya know, a single mom can’t get health insurance AND food for her baby without some bureaucrat sticking his nose where it doesn’t belong.

Yeah, the man is always the Real Victim here, right?

Classic DARVO.

You know if a Muslim did this the internet would go batshit.
Why are Muslims held to a higher standard? Why?

Child bride advocates: We adult men have to rape children because women might choose not to fuck us! They can’t be allowed to say no, they’re not really people* with the right to reject. But we tell them and ourselves it’s good for society. Since when have rape babies ever gone on to be, like, serial killers or something? Don’t oppress me with genetics.

*bestiality is the argument in favour? The best argument in favour. If you’re in favour of infantilising all children, good, but then you shouldn’t want to fuck them.

Why is a white man allowed to get away with any of this?
Do you still believe bleeding is the stable, reliable indicator of breeding ability, rather than a bizarre outcome of xenoestrogens in the modern world?

MRAs are responsible for this child abusing shit.
No, random men do not have any rights over random women. Sexual or otherwise.
They never did at any point in history, that’s an internet myth. You are stupid for believing in it.
There is fuck-all proof because it’s made up as the tooth fairy.

Keep your white Sharia and move to Saudi Arabia where you belong.
If you want someone to abuse, get a dog. Wait, they love their dog more than any wife. I think I see the problem. It’s them. They should be sterilized.

Male foreskin important to male sexuality

…You could probably guess just by looking at the basic anatomy.

Most of the nerves are in there, the prepuce. The reddit atheists never go after this topic although the prepuce is clearly good for the mammals that developed it.

When you find a non-dodgy funding scheme and a strong method, the results are guessable. Eminently guessable.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23374102

Have you looked up how much skin is removed from babies?

Stop mutilating babies! It violates every medical ethic going!

It isn’t good for women either. http://www.circumcision.org/femalesex.htm
But that is besides the point. Men have rights even when they’re babies.

The doctors want the money, the social engineers “need” to chop HIV risks, but that would look homophobic/racist/realistic, so they’re presuming things about the sex lives of all babies. It’s like the HPV thing for little girls all over again. Stop.

If they want it when they’re eighteen, they can get it. But when informed of what they’d lose by life experience *obscene gesture*, they don’t want it, do they?

Remember, the more HIV treatments fail, the louder the study demand for Mutilation is Good! will increase.
Eventually, it will be mandatory.
I haven’t even gone into the trauma from sense memories and how the parent never wants to be present. No pain relief. There are memories formed in utero, whether it’s repressed or not is a non-question. We may not remember explicitly, but the body does. The last vestige of recovered PTSD is physical for this reason, and it never leaves. It becomes a part of who you are. Look up maternal deprivation studies. This trauma occurs before memory is supposed to kick in. It’s also the reason women get custody (Tender Years) and MRAs are evil.

Marrying off children is always wrong

I wouldn’t trust people who think otherwise with a goldfish for the weekend, they might try to insert things into it.
The internet has made men deviant by placing all this monstrous filth at their disposal and they can congregate and assure one another it’s normal. Born this way, right? 

People are not possessions.
One triumph of the First World is self-possession.

You’re not even a fully developed adult until the mid-twenties.
It’s biological, look it up.

I mention this because some terrible people claiming to be right-wing want slaves. The original kind, the one that is purely for the purposes of rape. Instead of acknowledging they want someone they can rape and beat and, in their mind, get away with it, they try to make it socially acceptable – by insulting the institution of marriage.

That’s why they claim to be right-wing, trying  to make pro-marriage, pro-….whatever messed-up things they can think of, only to claim, what, that women want abuse? Nobody in the history of the world has ever believed that, if you’re a shit person at least admit it to yourself.

Women went to convents to avoid marrying these types of “men”.

Both parties enter any legal contract willingly.

There shouldn’t be any underage marriage, anywhere. It’s an oversight we’ve yet to correct.
If they’re not adults they cannot consent.
Children cannot consent.

Yet you see these creepy conversations in certain places about when to ‘get’ a girl (a Middle Eastern idea they openly admit, like bride kidnapping) so she can be brainwashed and conditioned into being a domesticated slave. 1. That doesn’t work, 2. that isn’t legal, 3. you won’t like your ‘purchase’ once it grows up and has a personality and will and intelligence likely above yours.

I love how many Thai brides and the like are divorcing their green-card old fogey husbands after the required years, who genuinely thought in all their smarts that these teenagers would be attracted to them, three, four or once I saw, five times their age. They’re not going to stick around and look after you. They think you’re a creepy lech, they hate you. Who wants to care for a person like that? Does it sound sexy to you? They weren’t attractive in their prime to begin with. Don’t expect Asian women to be all-about breaking out the adult diapers for your sagging ass, they’re just better at playing you for a while, as LBFMs. That’s if they don’t murder you and take your money, as younger wives have done for millennia, especially when forced by social circumstance i.e. money.

Completely one-sided and never foisting this on underage boys (like they can afford to slag off Ancient Greece) from a remnant sense of shame and disgrace, they expect somehow there’ll be a surplus of young women, despite how Those cultures have the opposite problem, and they’ll all be magically dying to marry men old enough to be their grandfather, or great-grandfather.

It’s sick.
It’s pedophilia.
It isn’t right-wing, it’s totally r-selected, early marriage is literally one of the cornerstones of r-selection, degenerate to boot, legally and morally wrong in every sense (the if she bleeds thing is completely medically false naturalistic fallacy, women died a lot that way so society stopped it and menarche never used to be this early, it used to be 17-19), it’s a state-sponsored form of child rape to trap an adult while they’re too weak to defend themselves and deprive them of any self-sufficiency (basic education), putting her in a big dress and a parody of a ring ceremony doesn’t change that fact.

God can see you.

Do you want to live in that craven culture?

And none of them developed as a strategy with an aging population, men used to die around middle-age, as we’d call it now.

I’m not going to allow them to pretend that’s ever been traditional. It isn’t anywhere in the Bible to sell your kid sister like a more fuckable goat, maybe convert to Islam if raping little girls is your thing.
It’s a case of how low can you go when raping children is socially acceptable. Why not primary-age? Nursery age? Newborns? Slippery slope is very real in this case.

There are sickening conversations about How Non-White Countries Do Things.

Yeah, cos we should model ourselves on them, huh?

Have you seen their standard of living? Do those people seem happy to you?
They’re wading through rubbish and shit nine times of ten. They rely on us like dependents for food and water. Have you looked at the IQs? Is that not a dysgenic breeding habit, to be discouraged?

And they basically only mean the pretty ones… with standards… okay, how is it physically possible for the above-average to become the average?

So what if Japan has an age of consent of fourteen, you sick fuck??

A virgin would still know you’re a terrible person and be dissatisfied with your sexual performance, girls are not stupid and teenage girls are the most critical species on the planet. It isn’t Hell Hath No Fury Like A Man Scorned, is it?

The vagina isn’t even necessary for female sexual pleasure, Freud was trying to massage his own ego, basically everything a woman needs is in the structures broadly called the clitoris, the homologue of the penis. These omega male powertrip fantasies about being the big strong man of Mills and Boon dreams slaking a nubile young woman’s lust are hilarious in the era of Ann Summers and the like. [I’m not insulting male sex toys either, it’s just a fact.] Women even have a prostate, there’s a female prostate, and it has basically nothing to do with what men do.

When her hands are better than you, and she sees better men for endurance online, she’ll have plenty of opportunity to mock you, and you can’t escape. That’s the real reason the beatings happen. Weak men try to show dominance, fail as they do, and take it out on the women and animals. The pattern repeats. Nobody is happy.

And if you marry to become a patriarch, do you want your children raised in fear, knowing their mother hates you?

The West has love matches because they’re better for the whole family. It’s civic and key to our success.

Children aren’t possessions or status symbols either. Keep your mutt, those enjoy obedience and humiliation.

Would you sell your daughters off for the same treatment? Probably not.

Like a cult, the mothers help too, it’s the cycle of abuse.

That watermark is unfortunate.