Won’t let me embed, deletes the code. Huh.
Live ones are heathen, at least.
2 This is what the Lord says:
“Do not learn the ways of the nations
or be terrified by signs in the heavens,
though the nations are terrified by them.
Astrology is something God does, he presaged the birth of Jesus with an astrological event that was meant to be heeded. Satanists only steal from that power and deceive us that it belongs to them so we never fully understand the Bible or how to stop them.
3 For the practices of the peoples are worthless;
they cut a tree out of the forest,
and a craftsman shapes it with his chisel.
4 They adorn it with silver and gold;
they fasten it with hammer and nails
so it will not totter.
Re Mary (Aphrodite) worship:-
Like a scarecrow in a cucumber field,
their idols cannot speak;
they must be carried
because they cannot walk.
Do not fear them;
they can do no harm
nor can they do any good.”
This is why we hate Catholics.
Papal pimp decor, 14
Everyone is senseless and without knowledge;
every goldsmith is shamed by his idols.
The images he makes are a fraud;
they have no breath in them.
Lord, I know that people’s lives are not their own;
it is not for them to direct their steps.
Pour out your wrath on the nations
that do not acknowledge you,
on the peoples who do not call on your name.
For they have devoured Jacob;
they have devoured him completely
and destroyed his homeland.
Tasty Biblical patriotism, now tear down your pagan icons.
Non-Christians keep trying to claim Christmas.
A celebration of materialism would clearly be Jewish.
until the Boomers die off and/or the economy improves.
I have been saying this since Best Post in 2014 and even before then.
It is Christian to punish the wicked system with non-compliance. Jesus turned the other cheek. They also say about “sparing” us the suffering of marriage, if it can be avoided.
“Are you free of commitment? Do not look for a wife.” – 1 Cor 7:27
I’m tired of fake Christians lying about this, it’s American Churchian bullshit that everyone should marry as God’s Will. There aren’t even enough women mathematically to go around if you forced everyone to marry at the point of a shotgun regardless of low IQ, homosexuality, infertility, poverty etc. Stop lying. What you say or imply is impossible and immoral.
“But those who marry will face troubles in this life,and I want to spare you this.” 1 Cor 7 again
There are no simple solutions, the birth rate is a SYMPTOM itself.
Whites are meant to have a K-select birth rate anyway.
There is no reason to invest in a system stealing your resources to fund the dysgenic families of others. There is no reason to produce kids that will be encouraged to take puberty blockers and learn about anal in year 1. There is no reason to settle with men who have whored around in Thailand with children and feel entitled to a “good girl” after deflowering and abandoning multiple of them years prior. They can’t even morally lead themselves, as adult individuals, let alone sons and daughters, whom they’d lead astray with weakness. Men have no moral authority in this era, based on their actions. Women do not respect modern men and the disgust is earned i.e. the fuckboy and manchild thing are valid objections by women. You’re white and acting like ghetto shit, stop it.
Why did 53% of white women vote Trump? Why did Leave win? Women want men to sort out the country and that must happen before they start doing their part re family. You have to clean the soil before planting seeds and the West is plagued with weeds and worse, locust.
By all means, mock Emma Watson – but I got there first.
However, nobody tells her how to find a good man.
Or which system she should marry in.
Or how many kids is optimal for the marriage.
s i l e n c e
So none of you are actually contributing intellectually. Negative nancies add nothing. Women already get shamed by the (((SJWs))) when they voice that pressure where they want a family, you’re helping them.
As it is, there is a systemic movement, rarely spoken by the middle class journo class.
We’re (young white people) deliberately starving out the zombie socialist pension ponzi. Good.
Let it burn. That’s exactly what we want. Don’t threaten us with a good time.
This is how women rebel in particular, passively. If you’re gonna burn down a house, do you renovate the kitchen?
No, no you fucking do not.
Just ask various women: “Honestly, are women putting off marriage and kids until men get their act together?”
Listen to the steady stream of well thought-out complaints.
We’ve seen women, perfect wives, dumped in middle age for Ting Tong. Who’d bother? Or women left with nothing because, staying at home, they couldn’t afford a lawyer. Women abandoned because their husband died without life insurance (or they didn’t pay) and he vainly didn’t want her with a good CV out the home so now the kids are on welfare. Why bother? Men have failed. Women discuss these failures openly, in bathrooms with strangers all the way to at events, we compare notes on how men we’ve seen or heard of socially are failing as patriarchs. It isn’t gossip, it’s strategy.
Even the Guardian types are now in gnosis:
The host is cutting off the leeches. Even Labour MPs don’t want to send their kids to diverse schools.
The rebellion is righteous, good and moral. We’re fucking the sinners over by going Galt.
“Hate what is evil, cling to what is good” style.
The actual Bible, Ecc 4:
“I saw the tears of the oppressed—
and they have no comforter;
power was on the side of their oppressors—
and they have no comforter.
2 And I declared that the dead,
who had already died,
are happier than the living,
who are still alive.
3 But better than both
is the one who has never been born,
who has not seen the evil
that is done under the sun.
Not having kids isn’t a sin or Jesus would be a sinner. You’re not better than Jesus for fucking some slag at a party while high. You are not God, as some arrogant men on this topic try to pervert or add to the Word. Do not make a vow to God you will not keep, don’t get married just to say you have like some vapid CA twat. You don’t know Christianity better than Jesus. Having kids isn’t a sign of morality, especially with the deadbeats and ghetto people doing it now. Young people are aware of the things their Boomer or Gen X parents shamed them for – being too loud or expensive or interrupting their “fun” or “ruining their life”, and presently stopping that cycle of abuse. Good. Don’t have kids you can’t afford, we need to sink back to pre-WW demographic levels and composition anyway.
The secret of change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the old, but on building the new” – Socrates.
Like Vox Day has said, white demographics are fine, historically. Eternal growth is cancer, food for socialist lampreys. They’ll fail eventually and do you want to be personally responsible for four, five kids when that happens? These same guys bitching muh sub-replacement balk at child support for one kid, STFU. You’re not a man then if you don’t want 100% of your gender role as provider. If the woman puts in her 100% by having the kids, you gotta pay for her to stay with them. That’s the point of marriage. Historically, some people didn’t breed and it was fine as long as they weren’t the brave WW lot, conned by bankers. We must focus on incentives, punishing the stupid actively and encouraging quality parents. Encouraging dysgenic higher birth rates is actually the white genocide, it pressures the system whites rely on (in their homeland) with foreigners and idiots.
It’s funny there are people deluded enough to think humans will always exist anyway, evolution is useful but not a purpose. The Bible explicitly says God will wipe us out anyway, at some point, the genetic legacy male argument is futile and won’t sway women. Women care about husband quality and enjoying that, kids are just part of the marriage. Women marry for the man. Stop kidding yourself.
There might be a war soon, we’re overdue. Food prices are going up, making home economics useless. The economy is stagnating from the idiot parasite load. Who wants more mouths to feed? At this time? The only people I’ve seen planning kids soon are morons. They feel entitled to the earnings of everyone else… it won’t end well.
4 And I saw that all toil and all achievement spring from one person’s envy of another.”
Where’s the incentive? If the game is rigged, wait until a new one comes along.
Let it burn.
Would you work under Communism? Well we have demographic Communism. Let them fail.
They wanted this revolution, this system of sodom, this evil.
This is the world you wanted, globalist socialists! You don’t get to moan!
Better not to have kids than abort them like a Boomer. Anti-natal involves sleeping around with no reproduction, it isn’t a person minding their own business and being …human, more than vain, rutting beast. Nobody I know wants their kids growing up in a diverse area, even in their homeland. It’s a silent strike. There are Boomers who actually feel entitled to demand their kids go into lifelong debt so they can have grandkids, who’d inherit that debt, despite getting money from their own parents to set up and breed. The social contract is dead. The practical intelligence (phronesis) comes in, young people are not stupid and can barely stay afloat for economic reasons, thanks to decades of multicultural policies and colonies voted in by the exact retards kvetching about birth rates. Fuck you, it’s your fault.
The birth rate won’t “improve” until 1. Boomers retire so young people can earn enough to set up 2. men are held accountable for kids they produce, many here don’t pay child support so…. why have kids, even in marriage? even marriage itself is no security so women are scared to breed, they also see the shorter lifespan for women in marriage and male abandonment for a younger model being enabled… why invest? Why? Men don’t commit. 3. no more hook-up culture as the bait on the hook to women that they must be whores to get male attention to maybe possibly get married and have a family. Eggs are expensive, stop trying to flip gender roles into women impressing effeminate losers who think they’re the shit for being worthless degenerates. Women are on strike especially. Women have a genetic legacy in siblings and cousins. This is why women care-take post-menopause while men become useless compared to the young competition (even military is a brutal Wall) and get various “mysterious” health problems with higher mortality (abandoning wife and kids that way) or just self-murder. Men want a genetic legacy personal to them but refuse to admit they need women (the ew cooties mgtow) or actually appreciate them for it so…. I guess your line dies with you? Who wants to give everything to a person who despises them? Femininity isn’t weak or evil.
Who wants to have kids to feed the Beast?
Whether it’s the fiat system throttling us on a timer or the rape gang Muslims down the street?
White people have a beautiful form of revenge, we will happily cut our nose off to spite our face. The left fears it, fears being cut off the host, shrieks when white people retreat. Fuck ’em.
We don’t have to just Go Along with your plans to destroy us, (((Activist))).
We’re not queuing up -with kids in tow- for the white gulag. This is siege warfare.
Multicultural societies have a lower birth rate because women are expecting and awaiting a war. Gladly. With no national security, the cultural shamed, people cowed and weak men literally inviting barbarians to take our ancestors’ gifts to us, why invest in the men who allowed this?
None of you hand-rubbing sadists happy about Mz “Self-Partnered” can answer me that question.
Whether she’s aware of it or not, this is how women actually work. We want a war. That caused your Baby Boom last century, remember?
This is how history and women actually operate. We breed with winning genes, not losers avoiding a fight like a PC damsel.
And don’t make the WW1/2 banker “mistake” of leaving the weak dysgenic men at home, the purpose is a cull of weak genes. Then you’ll get your birth rates up. Just look at the fashions of the time – pin-up. That’s what women want to be if you bring them war. We shouldn’t have to ask for it, that’s part of the test. Men are supposed to want to protect their nation. Then women protect their genes into the next generation. That’s the way around, we’re not the ones failing to pull our gender weight among young, fertile people. Men move first to make society safe, whether or not they know a “good one”. It’s an insult to us that you allow colonialism to continue. The women are nubile, the men ineffectual. Why don’t women want them? Why does Prince Charming always fight somebody in fairytales, and kill for her, if you wanna be Peterson about this?
Women are eugenic in the choice to breed and who with. Women don’t actually care about a genetic legacy, for themselves. At least slag off bachelors and spinsters properly. There are good reasons (religious, national, economic) for the choice, bad reasons (global warming, white guilt, SJWism – probably a cover for the same instincts) and those for whom it isn’t a choice, they have their ducks in a row (no survival priorities) and they’re desperately searching, like Emma and all the bitter MGTOWs who were in fact rejected by women (all women) first. This is Darwin 101 – sexual selection is a eugenic culling force. FEATURE, NOT A BUG. Better to have no kids, than invest in shit tier kids who’d get you killed in a war. Then there’s Red Army rape considerations if the children are a little older. Women sense civil unrest coming. It simply isn’t safe.
Iron sharpens iron.
Self-enchantment is important. Listen to some Chopin, bake a cake, see an old friend.
30 “You’ll be engaged to a woman, but another man will rape[q] her. You’ll build a house, but you won’t live in it. You’ll plant a vineyard, but you won’t harvest[r] it. 31 Your ox will be slaughtered in front of you, and you won’t be able to eat it. Your donkey will be stolen from you while you watch and won’t be returned to you. Your flock of sheep will be handed to your enemies, and there will be no deliverer. 32 Your sons and daughters will be given to another people while you watch. You won’t be able to approach them at all,[s] and you’ll be powerless to help.[t]
33 “A people whom you don’t know will devour what your land and labor produces. You’ll be only oppressed and discouraged continuously 34 until you are driven insane from what your eyes will see.
R-types are legit a Biblical curse.
36 “The Lord will banish you and your king whom you will appoint over you to go to a nation that neither you nor your ancestors have known, and there you’ll serve other gods of wood and stone. 37 You’ll become a desolation and a proverb, and you’ll be mocked among the people where the Lord will drive you.”
I’m thinking of all the weebs who move to Asia (good riddance, stay there), who are openly or secretly mocked by the locals as losers who couldn’t make it at home. It’s objectively true of ALL immigrants. We only take in other countries’ losers, by definition.
43 The foreigner in your midst will be elevated higher and higher over you, while you are brought low little by little. 44 He will lend to you, but you won’t lend to him. He’ll be the head, but you’ll be the tail. 45 All these curses will come upon you and will overwhelm you until you are exterminated, because you didn’t obey[u]the Lord your God to keep his commands and statutes, which he had commanded you. 46These curses[v] will serve as a sign and wonder for you and your descendants[w] as long as you live.”[x]
A warning to Trump on China:
49 “The Lord will raise a distant nation against you from the other side of the earth. Swooping down like a vulture, 50 it will be a nation whose language you don’t understand, whose[ac] stern appearance[ad] neither shows regard[ae] nor extends grace to anyone whether old or young. 51 Its army[af] will consume the offspring of your animals and the produce of your soil until you are exterminated. They[ag] will leave you without your grain, wine, oil, the increase of your cattle, and the lamb of your flock, until you are completely destroyed. 52 They’ll[ah] besiege all your cities until your high and fortified walls in which you have trusted collapse throughout the land. Indeed, they will besiege all your cities, which the Lord your God gave you.”
Technically they already invaded white nations by immigration.
The cannibalism sounds like urban ruin and already happened many times to China with each solar minimum.
Except their population exploded recently because they’re r-select.
61 Moreover, the Lord will inflict you with illnesses and plagues that were not written in this Book of the Law, until you are exterminated.
A super gonorrhea TB ebola HIV syphilis hybrid?
Sexual ones are a certainty since it’s all about obeying the Word.
22 “Then the generation to come—your descendants after you and the foreigners who come from afar—will see plagues and illnesses infecting the land that the Lord will inflict on it.23 The whole land will be covered[bh] with salt pits and burning sulfur, with nothing planted, nothing sprouting, and producing no vegetation—overthrown like Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim, when the Lord overthrew them in his raging fury. 24 All the nations will ask, ‘Why did the Lord do this to this land? What is the meaning of this fierce and great anger?’ 25 Then they will answer themselves,[bi]
‘Because they’ve abandoned the covenant of their Lord, the God of their ancestors that he had made with them when he brought them out of Egypt. 26 They followed and worshipped other gods whom they had not known and whom he did not assign to them. 27 For this reason, the anger of the Lord raged against this land, to bring upon it all the curses that were written in this book. 28 The Lord uprooted them from the land in his anger, wrath, and great fury, deporting them to another land, and that’s the way things are today.’
29 “The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but what has been revealed belongs to us and to our children forever, so that we might observe the words of this Law.”
secret = occult
You won’t live long[bt] in the land that you are crossing the Jordan River to enter and possess.
Emigration tends to involve death. No mention of a Geneva convention.
God separated peoples for their own good. That was his Will?
Do-gooders play God with the hubris and pathological altruism.
I’m not going through and finding them all.
“21They will build houses and dwell in them; they will plant vineyards and eat their fruit. 22No longer will they build houses for others to inhabit, nor plant for others to eat. For as is the lifetime of a tree, so will be the days of My people, and My chosen ones will fully enjoy the work of their hands. 23They will not labor in vain or bear children doomed to disaster; for they will be a people blessed by the LORD—they and their descendants with them”
Their OWN descendants.
Those doubting the intent:
“Unlike the past, invaders will not take their houses and confiscate their vineyards. For my people will live as long as trees, and my chosen ones will have time to enjoy their hard-won gains.” in another translation
“if you reject My statutes, despise My ordinances, and neglect to carry out all My commandments, and so break My covenant, 16then this is what I will do to you:
I will bring upon you sudden terror, wasting disease, and fever that will destroy your sight and drain your life. You will sow your seed in vain, because your enemies will eat it. 17And I will set My face against you, so that you will be defeated by your enemies. Those who hate you will rule over you, and you will flee when no one pursues you”
The people adulterating their bloodline are in for a shock.
“The LORD will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with severe heat and drought, and with blight and mildew; these will pursue you until you perish.”
The fake Christians don’t read the actual book.
If your priest says one thing and the book another, the ‘priest’ is wrong.
Political phobias don’t exist, it’s gaslighting.
“23Yet He commanded the clouds above
and opened the doors of the heavens.
24He rained down manna for them to eat;
He gave them grain from heaven.
25Man ate the bread of angels;
He sent them food in abundance.
26He stirred the east wind from the heavens
and drove the south wind by His might.
27He rained meat on them like dust,
and winged birds like the sand of the sea.
28He felled them in the midst of their camp,
all around their dwellings.
29So they ate and were well filled,
for He gave them what they craved.
30Yet before they had filled their desire,
with the food still in their mouths,
31God’s anger flared against them,
and He put to death their strongest
and subdued the young men of Israel.”
Why do atheists and CHINOs think Christianity is some bland, blanket pro-male thing?
He’s harder on sinning men. Greater power (head of a single household) comes greater responsibility (more rules, personally).
“32In spite of all this, they kept on sinning;
despite His wonderful works, they did not believe.
33So He ended their days in futility,
and their years in sudden terror.
34When He slew them, they would seek Him;
they repented and searched for God.
35And they remembered that God was their Rock,
that God Most High was their Redeemer.
36But they deceived Him with their mouths,
and lied to Him with their tongues.
37Their hearts were disloyal to Him,
and they were unfaithful to His covenant.”
The worst type of Satanist is a fake Christian. Deathbed conversion types still go to Hell.
You can’t trick a deity. Only they would be dumb enough to think they could.
“38Yet He was compassionate;
He forgave their iniquity and did not destroy them.
He often restrained His anger
and did not unleash His full wrath.
39He remembered that they were but flesh,
a passing breeze that does not return.
40How often they disobeyed Him in the wilderness
and grieved Him in the desert!
41Again and again they tested God
and provoked the Holy One of Israel.
42They did not remember His power —
the day He redeemed them from the adversary,
43when He performed His signs in Egypt
and His wonders in the fields of Zoan.”
Christianity isn’t a convenient thing you can pick up like a diet or for politics when the wages of sin are due.
This respite of time to actually repent and ‘sin no more’ (the condition) is a grace period, literally, because if ignored, the punishment gets worse when it comes.
“44He turned their rivers to blood,
and from their streams they could not drink.”
“45He sent swarms of flies that devoured them,
and frogs that devastated them.”
That one is funny.
“46He gave their crops to the grasshopper,
the fruit of their labor to the locust.
47He killed their vines with hailstones
and their sycamore-figs with sleet.
48He abandoned their cattle to the hail
and their livestock to bolts of lightning.”
Wow, that’s kinda starting to happen now. On a huge scale. Was this describing a climate shift? GSM?
“49He unleashed His fury against them,
wrath, indignation, and calamity—
a band of destroying angels.”
only dumb middle-aged hippies want to meet an angel, they’re metal
“50He cleared a path for His anger;
He did not spare them from death
but delivered their lives to the plague.
51He struck all the firstborn of Egypt,
the virility in the tents of Ham.”
The people complaining about aged male fertility are funny like… I thought you said the Lord would provide? Maybe having kids right now would cause them to starve later?
“52He led out His people like sheep
and guided them like a flock in the wilderness.
53He led them safely, so they did not fear,
but the sea engulfed their enemies.
54He brought them to His holy land,
to the hill country His right hand had acquired.
55He drove out nations before them
and apportioned their inheritance;”
Is it colonialism if God did it? I say no.
“He settled the tribes of Israel in their tents.
56But they tested and disobeyed God Most High,
for they did not keep His decrees.
57They turned back and were faithless like their fathers,
twisted like a faulty bow.”
Why are men like this? Was Adam this much of a shithead? There are TEN major rules. Ten! You can’t even do that right!
“58They enraged Him with their high places
and provoked His jealousy with their idols.
59On hearing it, God was furious
and rejected Israel completely.
60He abandoned the tabernacle of Shiloh,
the tent He had pitched among men.
61He delivered His strength to captivity,
and His splendor to the hand of the adversary.
62He surrendered His people to the sword
because He was enraged by His heritage.”
Stop f-ing it up.
“63Fire consumed His young men,
and their maidens were left without wedding songs.”
I’d rather be a woman in that scenario. Note that the women were spared because they weren’t sinning by setting the wrong tone of society as the moral authority. In Christianity, men are bound by the higher standards. It’s right there.
“64His priests fell by the sword,
but His widows could not lament.”
Which book are they reading?
Fake priests are going to be an interesting case study.
“6let God weigh me with honest scales,
and He will know my integrity.
7If my steps have turned from the path,
if my heart has followed my eyes,
or impurity has stuck to my hands,
8then may another eat what I have sown,
and may my crops be uprooted.
9If my heart has been enticed by my neighbor’s wife,
or I have lurked at his door,
10then may my own wife grind grain for another,
and may other men sleep with her.”
Being a creep is illegal, by God’s law. Lechery is a sin. These degenerate men slagging off the women of the same cloth are really mental. All they do is follow their eyes, usually overseas. Pluck ’em out then, if yoga pants offend your Amish sensibilities. Women have to make a mental effort not to ogle the topless billboard men constantly, learn the skill!
The Bible literally says the desire to cuck your wife will lead to her cucking you. Cmon.
“24If I have put my trust in gold
or called pure gold my security,
25if I have rejoiced in my great wealth
because my hand had gained so much,
26if I have regarded the sun in its radiance
or the moon moving in splendor,
27so that my heart was secretly enticed
and my hand threw a kiss from my mouth,
28this would also be an iniquity to be judged,
for I would have denied God on high.
29If I have rejoiced in my enemy’s ruin,
or exulted when evil befell him—
30I have not allowed my mouth to sin
by asking for his life with a curse—
31if the men of my house have not said,
‘Who is there who has not had his fill?’—
32but no stranger had to lodge on the street,
for my door has been open to the traveler—”
note: not settler, the passing-through
“33if I have covered my transgressions like Adam
by hiding my guilt in my heart,
34because I greatly feared the crowds,
and the contempt of the clans terrified me,
so that I kept silent
and would not go outside—”
crowded cities, huh?
“38if my land cries out against me
and its furrows weep together,
39if I have devoured its produce without payment
or broken the spirit of its tenants,
40then let briers grow instead of wheat
and stinkweed instead of barley.””
“They shall not build and another inhabit; they shall not plant and another eat; for like the days of a tree shall the days of my people be, and my chosen shall long enjoy the work of their hands”
“Woe to you who add house to house and join field to field till no space is left and you live alone in the land.”
he will dwell in ruined cities, in abandoned houses destined to crumble.
“Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness, and his upper rooms without justice, who makes his countrymen serve without pay, and will not give him his wages,
It’s ironic a book for the Middle East talks about guest right and breaking no law.
“Rescue the victim of robbery from the hand of his oppressor. Do no wrong or violence to the foreigner, the fatherless, or the widow. Do not shed innocent blood in this place.”
“17“But your eyes and heart are set on nothing
except your own dishonest gain,
on shedding innocent blood,
on practicing extortion and oppression.””
Jer 22, btw
“21I warned you when you were secure.
You said, ‘I will not listen.’
This has been your way from youth,
that you have not obeyed My voice.
22The wind will drive away all your shepherds,
and your lovers will go into captivity.
Then you will be ashamed and humiliated
because of all your wickedness.
…Why are he and his descendants hurled out
and cast into a land they do not know?
29O land, land, land,
hear the word of the LORD!
30This is what the LORD says:
“Enroll this man as childless,
a man who will not prosper in his lifetime.
None of his descendants will prosper
to sit on the throne of David
or to rule again in Judah.”
MGTOWs are anti-God if they’re still fornicating. It’s right there.
Remember, the people are the culture:
“If the Lord does not build the house, the work of the builders is useless; if the Lord does not protect the city, it does no good for the sentries to stand guard.”
If you make excuses for the manwhores, we’re all ruined. It specifically applies the harshest standards on the men time and time again.
A culture must be built up by its own people, not outsiders. Any citizens who ruin it with decadence and degeneracy, ruin it for everyone. Thy name is corruption.
A couple of these one could dismiss with prejudice but altogether it builds up to a picture.
Quite a picture.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
Why mention sexually immoral and adultery also? By modern, i.e. false, meanings those would be the same point? The same act i.e. sexing someone you aren’t married to, a particular type of intercourse.
I’ve been re-reading the sections with the word ‘adultery’, with the historically accurate context of adultery and it was there the whole time.
The Bible did say to test things so I looked and I’m shocked it’s clearly there in the phrasing. The only possible interpretation given the multiple instances of context like this is the Thou shalt not mongrelize linguistic origin of the Sixth Commandment.
This doesn’t bode well for the weebs and other outbreeding fetishists. “Their end will correspond to their deeds.”
The narrow modern definition is interpreted falsely (with intellectual dishonesty) and this lends new credence to the concept of the Way being narrow i.e. having the full context.
Romans 16:18 For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.
That would be a great way for a Satanist to destroy us, sell us a publicized misinterpretation of a Commandment so many break it. It also justifies their own lusts (belly, loins) as not sinful for the same acts. They flatter greedy fools (the simple) and what are men most easily deceived by? The phallus.
2 Timothy 4:3-4 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.
Equalism aka Liberal Creationism is the myth. Nobody who buys into it can be right-wing i.e. reality-based.
We even have genetics studies, we can physically SEE the differences!
Proverbs: Take the garment of one who puts up security for a stranger; hold it in pledge if it is done for an outsider.
Consider the context of:
James 4:4 You adulterers! Don’t you realize that friendship with the world makes you an enemy of God? I say it again: If you want to be a friend of the world, you make yourself an enemy of God.
with the modern limited sense, the use of the concept adultery there is erroneous.
They must mean the deeper, broader rooted sense of the sin.
FYI, scroll to the Sixth Commandment
“In most translations of the Bible, Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are translated: “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” In the literal translation of the Anointed Standard Translation of the New Testament and in the true translation of the Ten Commandments in The Truth Unveiled, these passages are translated as: “You will not mongrelize”.
In many people’s minds, there is a very great difference between these two translations, though, as we shall see later, this is due primarily to the purposeful degeneration of the etymology of the word adultery. At issue in the Greek Septuagint and in the Greek New Testament are two Greek words: ou moicheuseis. …
In the Latin Vulgate, Exodus 20:13 was translated as non moechaberis and Romans 13:9 as non adulterabis. The Latin word moechaberis is an inflected form of moechari, a transliteration of the Greek moicheuo, and is of little etymological importance since what it means is merely dependent upon what the Greek word means, which we will explore. However, what is important is adulterabis, an inflected form of the word adultero, since this is the Latin word most often used in the Vulgate and elsewhere to translate the Greek word moicheuo.
The Greek word ou and the Latin word non are simply negative particles, translated not. Thus, the words that we need to define in order to determine the correct translation of Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are the Greek word moicheuo and the Latin word adultero.
First, in order to define the word moicheuo, let us turn to a commonly used and commonly available dictionary, the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, edited by Gerhard Kittel and translated into English by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Now let us note that Kittel was a well-renowned German Greek scholar and is held in high-esteem by the scholarly community.
Under the entry word moicheuo, the following definition is given: “of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races.” [In the German original, Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, we find the original words of Kittel: “auch von Vermischung von Tier und Mensch oder von Mischung verschiedener Rassen”].
This, of course, is the classical definition of mongrelization. So the Greek of the New Testament and the Greek Septuagint confirm that the translation “You will not mongrelize” is correct.
Now that we have defined the Greek, what about the Latin Vulgate? Now we must define the Latin word adultero, and we shall do so using the finest Latin dictionary currently available and the standard among Latin scholars, the Oxford Latin Dictionary: “To mix (a substance or kind) with another, adulterate: to impair the purity or strength of, to give a variety of appearances to, change . . . to corrupt, debase.” Once again, when this is applied to people, we have mongrelization. So we find age-old agreement between the Latin and the Greek.
Therefore, using two of the most respected reference works available regarding Biblical Greek and the Latin language, and simply looking the words up, we find that these verses in the Bible are in fact an explicit prohibition against race-mixing.
To any intellectually honest person, the above definitions should be more than enough to convince him that the Bible explicitly prohibits race-mixing. This is exactly why the coalition of evil is so against a true and literal translation of the Word of God. In fact, it may be stated that their theology is little more than a justification system for the breaking of this divine law of God. If the translation You will not mongrelize is wrong, then the two reference works cited above, certainly two of the most prestigious works of their type available, are also wrong. Any legitimate Greek or Latin scholars would agree with these definitions; anyone who would disagree with these definitions have in fact turned their backs on legitimate scholarship and should stop being hypocritical and admit that they do not believe the Bible instead of trying to change what it and what legitimate scholars say.
Now, many people will simply go and find a dictionary that defines the above words as adultery, and then ignorantly presume that adultery is defined as marital infidelity and simply forget about the two definitions cited above.
To show the stupidity and intellectual dishonesty of these people, I have previously written a work entitled Hidden Truth, now published under the title The Truth Unveiled, which gave many more proofs of the definitions of the Greek and Latin family of words commonly translated adultery, and examined in detail every Biblical passage, both Old and New Testaments, where these words occurred. That is not the purpose of this present work. The reader is encouraged to also read the chapter regarding this family of words in The Truth Unveiled for a complete Biblical analysis of this family of words. The objective herein is to examine in detail the etymology of both the Greek and Latin words commonly translated adultery, the ways these words were used in other Greek and Latin literature and in key passages in the Bible, and to explore how the web of deception regarding these words has been woven through the degeneration of language. The information presented hereafter is indisputable and not a subject of debate: one will either be intellectually honest and believe it or one will suffer the fate of all liars and those who help make a lie.