Context in the Bible

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

Why mention sexually immoral and adultery also? By modern, i.e. false, meanings those would be the same point? The same act i.e. sexing someone you aren’t married to, a particular type of intercourse.

I’ve been re-reading the sections with the word ‘adultery’, with the historically accurate context of adultery and it was there the whole time.

The Bible did say to test things so I looked and I’m shocked it’s clearly there in the phrasing. The only possible interpretation given the multiple instances of context like this is the Thou shalt not mongrelize linguistic origin of the Sixth Commandment.

This doesn’t bode well for the weebs and other outbreeding fetishists. “Their end will correspond to their deeds.”

The narrow modern definition is interpreted falsely (with intellectual dishonesty) and this lends new credence to the concept of the Way being narrow i.e. having the full context.

Romans 16:18 For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.

That would be a great way for a Satanist to destroy us, sell us a publicized misinterpretation of a Commandment so many break it. It also justifies their own lusts (belly, loins) as not sinful for the same acts. They flatter greedy fools (the simple) and what are men most easily deceived by? The phallus.

2 Timothy 4:3-4 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.

Equalism aka Liberal Creationism is the myth. Nobody who buys into it can be right-wing i.e. reality-based.

We even have genetics studies, we can physically SEE the differences!

Proverbs: Take the garment of one who puts up security for a stranger; hold it in pledge if it is done for an outsider.

e.g.

Consider the context of:

James 4:4 You adulterers! Don’t you realize that friendship with the world makes you an enemy of God? I say it again: If you want to be a friend of the world, you make yourself an enemy of God.

with the modern limited sense, the use of the concept adultery there is erroneous.

They must mean the deeper, broader rooted sense of the sin.

FYI, scroll to the Sixth Commandment

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl720.htm

“In most translations of the Bible, Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are translated: “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” In the literal translation of the Anointed Standard Translation of the New Testament and in the true translation of the Ten Commandments in The Truth Unveiled, these passages are translated as: “You will not mongrelize”.

In many people’s minds, there is a very great difference between these two translations, though, as we shall see later, this is due primarily to the purposeful degeneration of the etymology of the word adultery. At issue in the Greek Septuagint and in the Greek New Testament are two Greek words: ou moicheuseis. …

In the Latin Vulgate, Exodus 20:13 was translated as non moechaberis and Romans 13:9 as non adulterabis. The Latin word moechaberis is an inflected form of moechari, a transliteration of the Greek moicheuo, and is of little etymological importance since what it means is merely dependent upon what the Greek word means, which we will explore. However, what is important is adulterabis, an inflected form of the word adultero, since this is the Latin word most often used in the Vulgate and elsewhere to translate the Greek word moicheuo. 

The Greek word ou and the Latin word non are simply negative particles, translated not. Thus, the words that we need to define in order to determine the correct translation of Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are the Greek word moicheuo and the Latin word adultero. 

First, in order to define the word moicheuo, let us turn to a commonly used and commonly available dictionary, the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, edited by Gerhard Kittel and translated into English by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Now let us note that Kittel was a well-renowned German Greek scholar and is held in high-esteem by the scholarly community. 

Under the entry word moicheuo, the following definition is given: “of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races.” [In the German original, Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, we find the original words of Kittel: “auch von Vermischung von Tier und Mensch oder von Mischung verschiedener Rassen”]. 

This, of course, is the classical definition of mongrelization. So the Greek of the New Testament and the Greek Septuagint confirm that the translation “You will not mongrelize” is correct. 

Now that we have defined the Greek, what about the Latin Vulgate? Now we must define the Latin word adultero, and we shall do so using the finest Latin dictionary currently available and the standard among Latin scholars, the Oxford Latin Dictionary: “To mix (a substance or kind) with another, adulterate: to impair the purity or strength of, to give a variety of appearances to, change . . . to corrupt, debase.” Once again, when this is applied to people, we have mongrelization. So we find age-old agreement between the Latin and the Greek. 

Therefore, using two of the most respected reference works available regarding Biblical Greek and the Latin language, and simply looking the words up, we find that these verses in the Bible are in fact an explicit prohibition against race-mixing. 

To any intellectually honest person, the above definitions should be more than enough to convince him that the Bible explicitly prohibits race-mixing. This is exactly why the coalition of evil is so against a true and literal translation of the Word of God. In fact, it may be stated that their theology is little more than a justification system for the breaking of this divine law of God. If the translation You will not mongrelize is wrong, then the two reference works cited above, certainly two of the most prestigious works of their type available, are also wrong. Any legitimate Greek or Latin scholars would agree with these definitions; anyone who would disagree with these definitions have in fact turned their backs on legitimate scholarship and should stop being hypocritical and admit that they do not believe the Bible instead of trying to change what it and what legitimate scholars say.

Now, many people will simply go and find a dictionary that defines the above words as adultery, and then ignorantly presume that adultery is defined as marital infidelity and simply forget about the two definitions cited above.

To show the stupidity and intellectual dishonesty of these people, I have previously written a work entitled Hidden Truth, now published under the title The Truth Unveiled, which gave many more proofs of the definitions of the Greek and Latin family of words commonly translated adultery, and examined in detail every Biblical passage, both Old and New Testaments, where these words occurred. That is not the purpose of this present work. The reader is encouraged to also read the chapter regarding this family of words in The Truth Unveiled for a complete Biblical analysis of this family of words. The objective herein is to examine in detail the etymology of both the Greek and Latin words commonly translated adultery, the ways these words were used in other Greek and Latin literature and in key passages in the Bible, and to explore how the web of deception regarding these words has been woven through the degeneration of language. The information presented hereafter is indisputable and not a subject of debate: one will either be intellectually honest and believe it or one will suffer the fate of all liars and those who help make a lie. 

Science says faith is healthier

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC61047/

Results

Mortality was 28.1% (475/1691) in the intervention group and 30.2% (514/1702) in the control group (P for difference=0.4). Length of stay in hospital and duration of fever were significantly shorter in the intervention group than in the control group (P=0.01 and P=0.04, respectively).

Conclusions

Remote, retroactive intercessory prayer said for a group is associated with a shorter stay in hospital and shorter duration of fever in patients with a bloodstream infection and should be considered for use in clinical practice.

I guess atheists need to encourage faith because science tells you there are benefits.

You can’t argue with science.

The benefits of faith (but not prayer) applies to other monotheistic religions too

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5686875/

There was a strong linear association between Quran memorization and hypertension, diabetes, and depression indicating that those who had memorized a larger portion of the Quran were less likely to have one of these chronic diseases. Future studies should explore the potential health benefits of Quran memorization and the underlying mechanisms.

Even monkeys prayed for heal faster.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6666604_The_effect_of_intercessory_prayer_on_wound_healing_in_nonhuman_primates

AKA no placebo effect.

Living in a Christian society has benefits.

Atheist tax?

This study was performed to examine the effects of intercessory prayer (IP) on wound healing and related physiological and behavioral factors in nonhuman primates. Twenty-two bush babies (Otolemur garnettii) with chronic self-injurious behavior (SIB) were stratified by wound severity and matched by total wound area. The animals were then randomized to IP and L-tryptophan or L-tryptophan only for treatment of SIB and related wounds. The IP intervention was conducted in a double-blind, randomized manner. Prayer was conducted daily for 4 weeks. Initiation of prayer was coincident with the first day of L-tryptophan administration. Physiological and behavioral variables were assessed at baseline and end of study. Following IP/L-tryptophan treatment, prayer-group animals had a reduction in wound size compared to non-prayer animals (P=.028). Prayer-group animals had a greater increase in red blood cells (P=.006), hemoglobin (P=.01), and hematocrit (P=.018); a greater reduction in both mean corpuscular hemoglobin (P=.023) and corpuscular volume (P=.008); and a reduction in wound grooming (P=.01) and total grooming behaviors (P=.04) than non-prayer-group animals. The results of this study are consistent with prior human trials of IP effectiveness, but suggest IP-induced health improvements may be independent of confounds associated with human participants. Findings may provide direction for study of the mechanisms of IP-induced health improvements in both human and animal models.

Christians iz magic?

sheeeeeet

I need to pray for a relative to win the lotto.

Global Christianity is still globalism

1000 words that’ve been a long time coming.

The title gives you the gist, you can TLDR on this but trust me, there are funny Bible quotes that trash their control freak churchian bullshit. Read bolded at least.

I’ve seen controlled ops trying to push a “unified Christian vision” but Christians have never thought alike, we are not hivemind leftist shills. They are making us stumble with non-rules. A Syrian Christian still has their nationalism, an African their traditions. Multiculturalism is actually a perverted Christian idea. It’s love thy neighbour but in the Bible, it expects you to live among actual Christians (not CHINOs) naturally of the same nation (and cultural heritage).

You can be a Christian anywhere, huh?

Go be Christian in rural China, send me a postcard from your death camp!

No, seriously. Dare ya. You see missionaries to Africa but those cucks don’t DARE do it in China!

The cargo culty Christians are adapting their missionary style to push things as traditional that never have been. Putting “Christianity” before nation is still treason. They even fixate on some nebulous idea of “Muh Christianity” which is bizarrely twisted 20th century American melting pot bullshit

(never worked, statistically!)

instead of the judgier parts of the BIBLE, Jesus’ admonishments and …. GOD?
Like there are American men and women who act like their word > God.
Don’t fall for it. Even Prager.
CHINOs lurking.
The missionaries are still trying to control you, fellow goodwhite.
Let’s continue feeding Africans instead of allowing their local economies to RECOVER and produce their OWN food, as Africans have begged us!
Because “Christianity”!

You don’t have exclusive rights to morality. That’s Satanic.

Did Jesus believe in white guilt as original sin? I missed that part.

Let’s not forget the sign-holding “Invade me” cucks with that Bible quote, when Satan could misrepresent the Bible too.

https://www.biblehub.com/matthew/25-35.htm

“I was a stranger and you welcomed me”

Look at those eyes. Those demonic eyes.

Yea but the angels visiting Sodom weren’t allowed to be raped by the crowd, ya know?

Context.

You’re assuming ill intent is impossible on both sides.

“Be shrewd as serpents” you’re supposed to spot people who mean you harm and avoid them!

https://biblehub.com/matthew/10-16.htm

Not enable in pathological altruism.

Jesus hates pathological altruism.

BUT I GUESS YOU’RE MORE ENLIGHTENED THAN JESUS ON CHRISTIANITY, YOU ARE MORE WOKE, THE WOKEST, COMMUNAL NARCISSISTS OF THE CHURCHES OF AMERICA.

“After all, God chose you and wants you to live at peace”
Statistically, multiculturalism’s civil unrest, social conflict and violent/sexual crime is anti-Christian, it’s a soft Christian genocide to match the hard one ongoing in MENA and under China’s Communist regime.

The Bible says to test things to know what is holy – crime stats are admissible in Christian morality politics.
https://biblehub.com/1_thessalonians/5-21.htm
“Put everything to the test”.

CHINOs hate it when you quote the Bible honestly, in context, they think only they’re allowed a Bible. That’s a sign of demonic possession posing as ‘angels’ of ‘guidance’, since the Lord’s Word is everyone’s, it belongs to everyone – Catholicism is clearly Satanic in influence because a church acts as a gatekeeper.

Yeah, gates of Hell.

What’s an invasion again?

Instead we get white guilt and “white people have no birthright to exist” genocide rhetoric and libertarian wet dream appeal to open border ‘happiness’.

Allow the soft economic invasion with no shots fired! Look at GDP! – The Fed, who love you.

A house divided CANNOT STAND. – Some American

Except since allowing the Asian invasion (stats of American immigration), your GDP has become shit, like San Fran.
My opinions have statistical backing, I read stats before coming to conclusions, after passing legislation to replace yourselves with a nation now 1 billion strong, China, …look at the nation. You traded ball games and hot dogs for massage parlours and Asian thots, literal Idiocracy tier degeneration, that was on a menu in the film. If Yang becomes POTUS, you think he’ll be better than Obama? Really? Instead of importing people who you claim ‘act white’ just act it yourselves? Stop cucking for other countries, first.

Open borders hurts workers, look around.

China doesn’t look happy to me. They’re not allowed on holiday or to commit suicide.

Bland Christian = Anti-white.

Will they put their “church” (cult ignoring parts of the Bible) above the nation it’s literally sitting on?

GOD KNOWS.

The way is narrow.

These Protestants are weirdly Catholic in worshipping A Church when the Bible expressly said not to trust men and have FAITH in GOD – not a fucking BUILDING.

Even so-called Christians in America, 9/10 wouldn’t act like it if their church ceased to exist. They’re loyal to their shitty bands and festivals, not the Lord. It’s ingroup preference but not Christian – foreigner over NEIGHBOUR. Might as well be a football club or a tumblr support group for Oreos.

Judas was paid. Tolerance does not equal permitting evil in your midst. Tolerance is not a Virtue in Christianity, either. Jesus didn’t tolerate the moneylenders.

And the angels still said to their host (who extended guest right) “ya’ll need to clear the fuck out”. – paraphrased

Angels are scary, mind. “Be not afraid”. Any Christian who thinks they wanna meet an angel is likely a chino.

Multiculturalism is suicidal guest right.

Suicide, including suicidal stupidity, is against God’s instruction. You can’t Jackass off a building expecting God to float you, even Jesus couldn’t!

Cucks hiding behind the Bible violate ‘honor thy father and mother‘ – bloodline.

No kids are better than feeble, unnatural kids.
https://www.goodmorningamerica.com/wellness/story/parents-boy-cancer-mixed-race-bone-marrow-match-62335038

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/573499/Mixed-race-skin-cancer-warning

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

“A considerable literature attests to the emotional, health, and behavior risk problems of mixed-race adolescents….”

Suicidal, diseased kids… God’s choice? The Beige People advocates loved the Alabama abortion ruling! But… they hate kids.

Hello, fellow Christian. Meet my asian GF, we’re living in sin together!

God said not to fall for this bullshit, false prophets!

Globalism is a way for cowards (usually men) to reject their duty to their own people.

Please send shekels and food, though – Love, CA.

Question the false We. When people with a passport claim English heritage like “we drink tea” – we?

Same with religion. Even Jesus’ disciples all practiced Christianity in different ways – were they bad Christians, CHINOs?

Socialism is not Christian. Thou shalt not steal. Super churches – greed. “Christian” men who cheat on their wife – where’s the stoning, eh? You wanna be held to a standard, fine – let’s. You know they’d be the first to let the barbarians in the gate because sob story – Fifth Column. Know them by their fruit. The kind to ‘forgive’ the rapists of their wife and kids. Forgiveness is for Jesus, messiah complex. Bible says justice and harming children incurs a penalty greater than a millstone. Do not fall for it.

They want Christians to fight – why allow the abortion thing and forbid rape and incest ones? Which were, by the way, the only type of abortions to ever exist and be permitted prior to the 60s? Abortion for those always existed, including in ancient times. The Romans have a Pill plant they drove to extinction. In the era of rape gangs, why harm other Christians?

Divide and conquer. You may not let your daughter date a mixed boy selling drugs in your area, but he can rape her in Alabama. You lose parental rights over your bloodline, that’s why the deep state passed it. The real reason. Your son gets drunk at a secret party and gets a mixed thot up the duff? Hope you wanna pay for her Gucci habit the next 18 years because she lied about being on the Pill. His life is over now and he’ll be induced to marry that slut. The church makes money for the next 18 years as your cuck son attends with his mocha bastard.

Try to have a back alley abortion? Your daughter’s now infertile.

It’s like turning you against your women. The West became great because it was the one place that respected female contributions, whatever SJWs lie.

How do I know they, CHINOs, and the homemaker waifu camwhores, female edition, are controlled ops? Shills?

They have been pushing the same ideas, specifically in the past 8 months.

No mere coincidence, friends. This is why I cast a wide net and watch stuff intended for men and stuff intended for women. It’s bizarrely the same, like Zoe Quinn levels of plotting.

If you repeat a lie often enough…… propaganda.

Be united with your Christian “brothers”… on the other side of the world.

Not your actual brother, that’d be ‘racist’… somehow.

No. They have a legal right to their homeland, me to mine. Saying people basically don’t deserve their homeland because Marxist Sandal Woke Jesus is still genocide incitement. Thou shalt not kill. Their genetics and mine have a legal, human right to exist and continue on, biologically.

They didn’t give a shit in 2004 when Bush wanted to bomb Middle-Eastern Christians with taxpayer money from atheists. Their sons actually get pushed into becoming soldiers and murdering for Israel.

Left-wing is known by their fruit of out-group preference.

Surrounded by Asian and African “Christian” women in the Anglo West?

You’re still dead. You don’t have white kids. Your line is dead.

Here’s Darwin and biology too, salt in your whore’s ax wound.

21st Century Psychology: A Reference Handbook

Reject cuckservativism, it’ll drag you down like France.

Asian women only want one kid then off to daycare with it and back to work. <1.2 replacement level. Atheistkult is a genetic suicide, death cult.

You can ignore reality but not the health problems, insanity, drug abuse, younger virginity loss of mixed race kids. The Lord designed us, huh? Then why not mixed already? Are you pridefully trying to erase God’s design?

Atheist nationalists, cultural Christians – are welcome.

Also, stop trying to enforce Christian apostate bullshit, culty Americans, we’re not Muslims:
https://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/7-15.htm

People are allowed to leave. God doesn’t want to make preachers prison wardens.

Americans don’t get a say on Europe and its culture – you left your kin and chose to fuck your slaves. Stay in your melting pot lowering IQ lane. Whites (not mixed HuWhites, there’s no such thing as a hyphen American) are dying out in America, you are dead, demographically, in your rebel state. God is punishing you.

(((Traditional marriage)))

Does the domestic abuse rate match?

You couldn’t even afford a Russian?
Your beige future, America. Either way, you cucked yourselves.

Stay there and stew in the vibrant diversity of shit-covered streets and pedo teachers teaching kids anal. You deserve it. You can be like Venezuela, mixed race people vote so smart!

You wanted hyper-sexualised mystery meat, now your grandkids look adopted. HA.

Wages of sin when you marry a fetish.

Part of grooming by forensic and legal definition includes the sexualisation of children. What’s Sex Ed? What’s America? Hollywood is just the less diseased face of the porn addiction industry. Who’d buy the herpes meds without adultery romance films? America opposed the short film The Kiss, when it was a moral, dignified place the world respected. Now that’s in U-films. It’s like a dystopia and we’re living in it. TITLE: One Century Later.

The Time Machine reboot would’ve been amazing if a Victorian saw our whoredom idiocracy and called it out. They wouldn’t respect… this.

Hate what is evil, as the Bible taught. Currently, America is Sodom, a cultural cesspit that is actually looking forward to an economic collapse. Show me a civilized society in the history of humanity so self-destructive to do that, instead of …. deportations? Yeah, starve the children than kicking them out with their wastrel parents and have bad PR. You’re so noble! God’ll sort ’em out, right?

The guys who complain about make-up

are also the ones who’d complain if a woman smells like anything other than floral body lotion.

Like, they’ll criticize women for being fat but also being “high maintenance” i.e. not fat.

Nah-uh!

By ancient standards, you’re more decadent than a French king.

Think how poofy you’d be.

 

You sleep on fluffy pillows, on stitched mattresses, with plush blankets, having used liquid soap, shampoo, conditioner, toothpaste, deodorant, a comb, an electric razor, central heating/air conditioning, with a glass of cold milk waiting in your refrigerator if you wake up thirsty. You think this is nothing and feel entitled to this and more.

 

Who’s the vain one? When are these guys dispensing with all their vanities?

First up, the smartphone! Ultimate vanity symbol! Don’t need that!

Right….?

Right guys?

No, you won’t give up modern comforts so STFU lecturing everyone else.

Do it yourself first and then you might have something to signal with.

 

Being attractive isn’t a sin! These embittered boys are like SJWs and want everyone else to stop making an effort because they’re too lazy! (Covert narcissism, their ego is triggered because they stand out for not making the effort).
R-types want an equalist playing field, remember? Equal outcomes. They actually believe it’s better we’re all equal in stench and skin ailments (skin cancer exists) than feel insecure some dude next to them on the train is wearing nice jeans and a cool cologne.
Men against make-up, for a third-world society looking and smelling like shit.
It already does, in my opinion, let’s not make it worse. The average person makes less effort with their appearance than at any time period before in all human history.
Fashion history exists, whether you read it or not.
Porn taught you “make-up” (please define make-up, guys who can’t spot eyeliner) is a sexual invite and you’re pissed the fiction is fake. That isn’t the world’s fault. That’s your fault for being dumb. (They also think natural beauty is a sexual invitation because addicts are gullible idiots).
What other people look like and how they groom their body has nothing to do with you. Stop being so shallow and obsessing over it.
Grooming is a basic primate instinct. If you don’t have it, you’re clinically depressed.
They look at a naturally pretty girl and think she’s a bitch for wearing lipstick – who’s sinning here?
Jesus himself went off on one at the person who dared call his oil bath vain. There is a spiritual bond between how we treat ourselves (with respect) and how we act in the world (decently).
How dare any of you Americans (and it’s always Americans) shame people about simple standards of appearance?
I’ve been to your country enough times to know you have Fuck-All to be proud of in the appearance stakes.
Romans 12:1, NKJV. “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service
1 Corinthians 10:31, NKJV. “Therefore, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.”
I Corinthians 6:19-20, NKJV. “Or do you not know that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and you are not your own? 20 For you were bought at a price; therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God’s.”
And there’s nothing sinful about having a woman’s body either, God made that too. To insult a woman’s natural form is to blaspheme God’s design.
Genesis 1:27, NKJV. “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.”
Beautification is not a sin, and never has been (there are plenty of Biblical references about good, moral wives looking good too and being the pride of their husbands) it’s about a First World living standard and a longer lifespan, pride is the sin. Like presuming to judge other’s non-silicon appearance and the body/Temple God gave them…
If you look at the history of cosmetics, it’s always been primarily about health because, guess what? Healthy people are more attractive! Cosmeceuticals are not a new thing! Only in the past couple of centuries have they been separated off. Why? Legal reasons. Lower standards for non-medical products to hit the market or that they couldn’t prove the really subjective claims e.g. radiant smile. What’s that? How do you medically prove that?
These would be the “men” who attack other men for wanting to make the best of their appearance.
Leave them alone and join a pro-ugly group, you losers.
Sorry attractive people enjoying their life make you sad, but this isn’t a company’s fault, it’s evolution. [Explain sexual selection without attractiveness, I fucking dare you.]
Since it’s none of your business unless it’s your wife, join a monastery if attractive things frighten you. Do you balk at flowers and smiling babies too?
If everyone went back to smelling like ass and swamp crotch, you’d still be bottom of the barrel and whine about it. Fitness still exists.
Sports are as decadent as Hollywood but the guys claiming models shouldn’t be paid for what nature gave them never ever apply that logic to the genetic freaks known as athletes.
They’d only be happy in the world of Harrison Bergeron because pretty people couldn’t oppress them by comparison. Dya wanna ban Photoshop too? You do, don’t you?
It’s basic etiquette to look good and act good too.
This isn’t an either/or, don’t try to spin a false dichotomy out of this.
Looking like a slob is a sin as much as being it. It’s literally a sin to apply sloth to your personal care habits.
When are you banning mouthwash for making men seem more attractive than their natural oral bacteria (including the likes of Herpes) might suggest?
Jesus never used mouthwash. QED according to you.

Ishtar or Mary?

https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1991480

“Ishtar’s worshipers addressed her as “the Virgin,” “Holy Virgin,” and “Virgin Mother.” The ancient Sumero-Akkadian “Prayer of Lamentation to Ishtar” states: “I pray to thee, O Lady of ladies, goddess of goddesses. O Ishtar, queen of all peoples. . . . O possessor of all divine power, who wears the crown of dominion. . . . Chapels, holy places, sacred sites, and shrines pay heed to thee. . . . Where are thy likenesses not fashioned? . . . See me O my Lady; accept my prayers.”

No such thing as “sacred prostitute”, Satanists lie. (conflation enhances their “power”, they think)

Then there’s the “witch hunt” smearing of old pagan religions during the Middle Ages, ironically by Satanists. Lying about history isn’t something a Christian needs to do.

“It spread throughout Mesopotamia, and either Ishtar herself or goddesses with different names but similar attributes were worshiped in Egypt, Phoenicia, and Canaan, as well as in Anatolia (Asia Minor), Greece, and Italy.”

Different name, different deity.

A child-killing whore is about as far contrary as one can get in attribute to a Virgin Mother or Holy Virgin.

“The principal mother-goddess worshiped in Egypt was Isis.”

A wife and mother and healer.
Up isn’t down.
Not to be confused with

“In Phoenicia and Canaan, mother-goddess worship focused on Ashtoreth, or Astarte, said to be the wife of Baal. Like her Babylonian counterpart, Ishtar, she was both a fertility and a war goddess. In Egypt ancient inscriptions have been found in which Astarte is called lady of heaven and queen of the heavens. The Israelites had to put up a constant fight against the degrading influence of the worship of this fertility goddess.”

Degrading? Not the others, then. Isis was faithful to Osiris, famous for it and he was faithful to her. If men didn’t make fertility a woman’s prime value in those days, there’d be no demand for a fertility goddess, would there?
Lumping them all in together because they have breasts is lying. Where’s Hera? She was a vengeful piece of work like Kaali/Durga.
It’s like confusing Jesus with John the Baptist. It’s not even wrong.

“In Rome, Venus was the goddess of love and, as such, corresponded to the Greek Aphrodite and the Babylonian Ishtar. The Romans, however, also worshiped the goddesses Isis, Cybele, and Minerva (Greek Athena), all of whom reflected in one way or another the Babylonian archetype Ishtar.”

Minerva was a Virgin Goddess, sexually Egyptians worshiped Hathor and others, Isis was a sacred wife like Juno.

So much information online is completely wrong.

I can’t help but think it’s intentional.

next page

“Vatican II encouraged the cult of the “Blessed Virgin.” Pope John Paul II is well-known for his ardent devotion to Mary. During his extensive travels, he never misses an opportunity to visit Marian shrines”

Thou shalt have no other gods but me….

See anything missing?

What does no one discuss?

Jesus is the Virgin God.

Protection

A refresher for if you read anything sinister.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm+23

“Psalm 23
A psalm of David.

1 The Lord is my shepherd, I lack nothing.
2 He makes me lie down in green pastures,
he leads me beside quiet waters,
3 he refreshes my soul.
He guides me along the right paths
for his name’s sake.
4 Even though I walk
through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil,
for you are with me;
your rod and your staff,
they comfort me.

5 You prepare a table before me
in the presence of my enemies.
You anoint my head with oil;
my cup overflows.
6 Surely your goodness and love will follow me
all the days of my life,
and I will dwell in the house of the Lord
forever.”