So they can wear police uniforms, asylum hospital uniforms, colonial uniforms and fascist outfits, but it’s okay because they’re the ‘right’ skin colour? I warned you they’d be doing this. SJWs steal symbols of order and ideology all the time, they’re sartorial phagocytes.
rebellions require aesthetics, that’s why, so this is important
they cleverly prevent rebellion against their ideas by being superficial turncoats to all rivals e.g. the shaved side haircut a few years ago, making group differentiation all but impossible online, which is a visual medium
so this is really important, strategically
not ‘just fashion’
fashion demonstrates power, a king with his crown
Also SJWs only wear crosses, which is either really bigoted in the sense they don’t dare wear Jewish (they claim same religion) or Muslim symbols (all monotheism) and it is both an endorsement of Christian values embedded in the aesthetic, as well as flagrantly disrespectful if you don’t practise that religion but appropriate the symbols to seem ‘edgy’. I’ve asked people wearing a cross if they were Christian and what type and they looked at me like I was the idiot. That’s like waving an Islamic State flag and wondering why you got arrested. Yet they slag people off just wearing guns for self-defence…. hey, it’s their aesthetic, right, tumblrfags?
aesthetics are a tool of domination, all empires had them
technically, wearing a cross in mockery or parody could be considered a hate crime so there’s that
(the Christian cross was invented specifically for Christians and doesn’t mean anything else, that’s why)
humiliation by trivialising the sacred, like Pussy Riot trashing a church
so yes, it’s important
standard SJW strategy, like it or not, this is how the Cultural Marxists are coming for us
Western patriarchy IS an aesthetic and nobody is saying anything while they’re stealing it. Just wow.
false flagging with aesthetics is like the female v of ‘sneaky fucker strategy’, it’s fake femininity like an ugly person becoming a gym rat to obscure or cloak their deficits in Darwinian fitness. SJWs are dressing up like tradwomen (cottagecore) so tradmen listen to them or stop listening to tradwomen, suspecting them as SJWs (both outcomes destroy the traditional family unit and group harmony)
fashion is war for women but it is also national (pride) and this has been forgotten recently with “”international publications”””
yet the manosphere never talks about fake femininity…. they just so happen to keep netting NPD and BPD women, who fake their femininity…. to control men….. ….and wonder why this keeps happening
Hollywood won the white West over with aesthetics, wake up! This IS important. They don’t make neoclassical buildings anymore because they fill us with HOPE. What about clothes? Are some more healthy and inspiring than others? It isn’t about hemlines, it’s the whole aesthetic and its philosophy underpinning it!
Meanwhile, in the comments are people saying Americans shouldn’t expect other cultures to change to suit them… ok… then let Poland be Polish, Germany be German and England be English? The gaslighting is amazing.
Yet the controlled ops of the right uses none of the appropriation discussion and continues to ignore it, an easy win in the culture war. Sometimes I think the right doesn’t exist anymore and it’s 99% controlled ops with the odd weirdo like me. I should’ve taken the ticket, perhaps.
SJWs create nothing, they can only steal/appropriate. They stole pop culture music, drama, comedy, painting/art and now they’re coming for fashion and the right flops over like a dying dog exposing its belly because it’s ‘just stupid clothes hur dur’.
I’m thinking of giving up, the real men are long dead. They’re all nihilists at this point making stupid podcasts and edgy youtube whinefests, why bother?
Instead we have navel-gazers ignoring this stuff, controlled ops shills and peter pan syndrome in search of a replacement mommy. Mummy issues are not right wing. A wife won’t be your mommy. Stop. Waifu is peak Oedipus.
I don’t understand why is that outfit so offensive, like, it’s lolita fashion, we’re dressing like rococo period children but it’s not like we agree with or romanticize the political climate of 1700’s France
but they do romanticize it, specifically the framing and murder of an innocent mother. A con artist stealing a necklace led to an innocent woman’s gorey death but YAY ruffles!
it’s like walking around dressed as Lincoln with a bloody gunshot wound to the head, WTF
and you wonder why French people hate Americans? REALLY?
mocking their brutally murdered relatives, maybe?
but the mongrel at the end made a joking-not joking reference to decapitating anyone she calls an oppressor….
she’s wearing clothes made by slaves… she’d be the one decapitated
THE BBC has come under fire for broadcasting a segment on Halal meat on Sunday night’s Countryfile with viewers accusing the Corporation of hitting a “new low” and “justifying vile Halal slaughter practices on our soil”.
Mr Heap said: “Like some other religions how the animal is killed is significant and for Muslims that means Halal slaughter in which a blessing is said before the animal dies.
Discussing the practice the Imam said: “There are certain practices where you want to fulfil a commandment of God and you’re basically invoking God’s name upon that. You are making the sacrifice in the name of God and now it’s made Halal. Halal means permissible and it’s been made permissible by God for you.”
It isn’t our God. That’s a violation of our human rights.
BELGIUM is set to challenge European Union laws on halal and kosher slaughter in a court case that could have massive repercussions across the bloc.
The french-speaking region of Wallonia, on September 1, will become the second Belgian authority to ban halal and kosher slaughter in a move to ban killing animals without first stunning them.
It’s barbaric. They try to call it “traditional” in our news propaganda but it isn’t traditional here, it doesn’t belong here and never will. Also, the Muslim religion is so young it should barely merit anyone’s consideration.
Flanders first introduced a ban, which came into effect on New Year’s Day, on the Muslim and Jewish ways of ritually slaughtering animals. Critics of the ban have suggested the move comes as part of a shift to an anti-immigrant shift across Belgium as the right-wing Flemish nationalists continue to cement themselves in mainstream politics.
Or Europe wants to be European? If they don’t like it, fuck off home.
While the court could take up to two years, any decision could set a precedent for the whole of the European Union.
A number of EU countries, such as Denmark, Sweden and Denmark, have banned traditional slaughter without stunning.
But the court challenge will test European laws between animal welfare and religious freedoms across the bloc.
The freedom not to eat that shit?
Mohamed Bouezmarni, the head of the Muslin association in the town of Arlon, has warned bans could drive the ritual slaughter underground.
He told Politico: “Everyone will do it at home, or in some corner, hidden from view.
Grounds for deportation.
“I think that is not the animal activist’s aim.”
Pinchas Goldschmidt, the president of the Conference of European Rabbis, warned Jews were left as “collateral damage” while bans targeted the Muslim community.
Go home to Judea. Nobody cares.
Europeans want their continent to have our own people’s practices.
That’s our birthright.
If you go to Y. Tube and look up hal al slaughter you will see the horrific abuse these animals are put through , they are kicked , thrown about , and the sheer terror is plain to see in the animals. This barbaric practice is abhorrent , worse till in moos lime countries , were people, including children stand and watch, laughing at the terrified animals, and blood running down the streets .
I have seen it for real in a slaughter house about 50 years ago. The animal to be killed and those in close proximity can hear, smell and sense it and the cries and screams they make is awful to hear and see them struggling. The problem with the meat though is that any animal that suffers unnecessary or undue stress means that their bloodstream is packed with endorphins that are released and it is said that the meat does not taste as good as it would do if not stunned first in a calmer environment. Personally I would rather limit the practice so that the majority of the population who are non-participants of those faiths know that animals were killed humanely.
aka civilization? yeah, we have a bias to that
It’s also more bitter and tough from the adrenaline, a taste the East prefers, so you can’t even justify from a taste perspective.
They are pure scum these people that put animals through this type of abuse.,
Unfortunately, these backward peoples do not share our thoughts about cruelty to animals. They seem to gain some pleasure from maintaning the practice on the grounds that the man with a child bride said so. Obscene.
You forgot the part where he ordered his son to divorce so he could rape the wife. What Muslims call visions were literally just lucid dreams, it’s demonic to pass that off as religion.
Islam and Judaism, the kiddy rape religions.
High time the UK also banned these cruel practices. If a persons religion stops them from eating non-Halal meat they can become vegetarians
It’s laughable seeing Butchers trying to make Halal Slaughter look good
Ritual and Slaughter are two words that should never be combined in anything considered legal. It is illegal for very good reasons and there should be no exceptions.
They merely practiceon non-human animals.
With Kosher, we all know Jack the Ripper. That’s why he killed them by the neck, a tricky thing unless you’re a halal/kosher butcher. There are multiple tough layers of tissue. He ate Mary Kelly’s face.
Take a good, long, hard look. Should this ritualistic killing practice be legal in the First World?
And that guy tried the same thing on the non-jew mother of his child.
“ripping parts of her face off and draining her of all her blood in their Hollywood apartment”
same as Mary Kelly
An autopsy found she was tortured for eight agonising hours before she died from her injuries.
What does that look like?
Allow them to train in this and it’s probable they’ll use it on you once they have numbers.
From the recent murder:
Her skull was exposed after parts of her scalp and one ear were either cut or ripped away.
Or chewed off.
According to the Toronto Sun, Dr James Ribe of the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office said: “I have never seen this before.
“And I doubt hardly any forensic pathologists in this country or abroad have even seen this, outside of, perhaps, wartime … it’s extremely rare.
“[Her] entire scalp was traumatically absent and was not found, was not present with the body.”
The report shows there was also an injury to Kasian’s jaw that appeared to be human bite marks.
Those are similar to Kelly.
So this religious sacrifice stuff is not trivial.
comment from Express paper
One way to deal with it is to mark all food that is halal as such, and no meat prepared where ANY halal slaughter happens is marked as halal. Then we, the non barbaric people of the planet, can refuse to buy any halal meat and avoid all shops where halal is sold.
They want to deceive.
For example all NZ lamb is halal, ALL of it. But this is not marked. And if you ask any of the major supermarkets if they can guarantee that any particular cut of meat they produce is or is not halal they cannot guarantee this. Why? Because they are scared. Let us make them scared of going broke!
The law is already there. They need a legal case.
A fine point here
Imagine the debate if freedom of religion was extended to people following the Incas’ religion. Should the human victims be stunned before their hearts are ripped out?
Yeah, that’s the point. You’re training up executioners. Just in case a One World Religion were forced on us at any point.
Our supermarkets should be legally obliged to label meat which is halal/kosher so that as consumers we can make an informed view as to whether or not to buy it.
“Under the Consumer Rights Act, traders have certain obligations when they supply goods (including digital products) to a consumer. This basically means that your business has to comply with certain rules when you sell things to customers.
Under the legislation, the products you sell must:
be of a satisfactory quality
be fit for purpose
match the description
be installed correctly, if installation was part of the contract”
Implying non-Halal when it isn’t, is a violation. Deception by omission.
There are others but I can’t be bothered to go hunting when it’s obvious. Transparency is vital.
if they want this kind of slaughtered babaricly meat, go to your country of ancestry. too much of muslim and jewish ways are being forced on us.
The Jews made up Islam to weaponise against Christian Europe, study up.
The child rape exemption is a critical similarity. Oddly similar ages and everything.
Non-Muslims can’t have Halal, it’s idolatry and an animal sacrifice when Jesus was the last sacrifice. But Muslims can eat Kosher…. it’s the same religion. Atheists also have a right to abstain from these products, it’s basic consent.
“During the process, a Muslim will recite a dedication, know as tasmiya or shahada.”
“Tesco says the only difference between the halal meat it sells and other meat is that it was blessed as it was killed.”
“Blessed?” Are you serious? No wonder their company is tanking.
Ever since this came out, 2014, people are boycotting.
They’ve lost clean half their pricing.
“Stunning of livestock has been mandatory in the the EU since 1979, although member states can grant exemptions for religious slaughter.
Note: Member…. states… not nations. Sections of EU Empire.
Some countries, including Denmark, have opted to ban non-stunning slaughter altogether. The UK government says it has no intention of banning religious slaughter.”
How many Gov petitions can you ban? Can we reach Brexit Party for comment?
“Jewish law strictly forbids the use of stunning and meats are not blessed in the same way.
Unlike for halal, kashrut does not require God’s name to be said before every slaughter after an initial blessing.”
Not our God. Who is we?
“Currently, there is no requirement for halal or kosher meat to be specifically labelled.”
False, trades description act and various consumer protection laws as well as religious rights to decline consent (it’s idolatry to any other religion so Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist etc).
The laws are right there. You are neglecting the population and animal rights in refusing to enforce them. There’s a negligence here bordering on criminal “oversight”.
Slight detour but relevant. #######
Presumed consent with organs is also a violation. Will you care when they book your euthanasia appointment? The boat people need transplants, evil Anglo. You had an unlicensed opinion and the diversity board has voted to terminate you with extreme prejudice. Yet nobody is asking in the run-up to this election. A country of sheep led to slaughter.
“If passed, it is expected to come into effect in England in spring 2020 – because the timetable for its introduction will allow for a year of “transition” to the new law.”
“Under the new law, those who do not wish to donate their organs will still be able to opt out via the register and by using an NHS app that launches at the end of the year.”
Opt-outs make “errors” and bodies are raped anyway (yes, it’s organ rape, the forcible seizure or taking), found hollowed-out when checked. We won’t gut you, trust the app! What if they don’t have access to the app? Old phone, no phone? Even the Nazis didn’t do this shit.
“Currently, fewer than half of families give consent for their loved one’s organs to be donated if they are unaware of their wishes, and ministers hope that the new system will encourage people to make their wishes known before their death”
They’re going to over-ride the families with it.
“Under the new plans, specialist nurses will be on hand to discuss donation with families after a loved one dies.” Guilt-tripping the grief stricken, shame on them. And define “dies” because viable organs are still alive at the point they’re ripped out, it’s murder. So after it’s proclaimed dead but not biologically?
“We need to address myths and misconceptions around donation, and we will only do this by having informed debate and dialogue, which I hope will be fostered by these proposals.”
Are all NHS doctors obligated by oath to donate? No? Huh. Funny that. All politicians signing this in at least? Why won’t this register be public? It would reduce errors.
Consent to donate, comrade. We won’t kill you.Here, take a shiny cutesy death card and await treatment for twelve hours before we suspiciously put you/r loved one on a Death Care Pathway (still done).
What’s to stop ‘mistakes’ when they plant cards on people who didn’t want it? You can’t ask questions, the state owns your body. China is a human rights monster, remember?
“We must have a full, consistent public education system with faith groups, schools, colleges, universities, and with the public as well,” she said.
Revelations doesn’t apply to you if you’ve been butchered. I do wonder if the cannibals are planning on nicking a lot of this organ meat. I find it odd Jimmy Saville wanted to be left alone in NHS morgues with fresh human corpses.
We live in Hell, I’m 99% sure. Gaslighting kids to donate their organs when 3D printing exists but they’re too cheap to do it (despite a rejection rate of zero). Lord, please destroy socialism soon.
Consent to your destruction, all this says. If you think it isn’t related, including the Cannibalism for Global Warming initiative, you haven’t been paying attention.
“The HFA says many slaughterhouses will have chosen to move to halal processes so they do not lose Muslim customers.
The latest census suggests there are 2.7 million Muslims in the UK, with a spending power estimated in the region of £20bn.”
Latest was done almost ten years ago.
“Jewish and Muslim leaders agree, and have called for “comprehensive labelling” of meat.”
THEN WHY ISN’T THIS ACTED UPON. WE NEED COMMENT PRE-ELECTION.
Especially since this is EU related and we had Parliament petitions.
Abigail Ward, 16, who attends Gildredge House school in Eastbourne, East Sussex, was told by exam board OCR that she had made ‘obscene racial comments’ while answering her Religious Studies exam in June.
On the subject of halal butchers, the student had written, ‘…which I find absolutely disgusting.’
Speaking to The Sunday Telegraph, the 36-year-old said the family were shocked by the decision to disqualify her daughter, and the exam board has since been overturned the decision.
Rat being tapped out of a halal animal like it’s normal. The conditions are disgusting and we’ve seen people filming in the places here, videos on the paper websites, with loud music terrifying the animals and what looks like shit everywhere because they were so terrified.
As far from clean as possible.
The prevalence of animals with bilateral false aneurysms was 7 and 8 percent for
Shechita and Halal slaughter, respectively, whereas no false aneurysms occurred during
bleeding in cattle that were electrically stunned and simultaneously developed a cardiac arrest. The authors concluded that combination of false aneurysms and collateral routes to the brain present a risk of sustained consciousness during religious slaughter in cattle.
….Velarde et al. (2003) showed that lambs that were hoisted and bled without being stunned, lost less blood from the sticking wound than lambs that were electrically stunned (250 V, 50 Hz,
3 s), hoisted and then stuck.
aka the more European way
The authors mentioned as a likely explanation that the muscle
contractions associated with electrical stunning forced blood away from skeletal muscles
towards the vessels in the thorax and abdomen.
And other proof of its inhumanity. 80 pages of it.
Aspiration of blood and refluxing gut content after the incision was considered a welfare concern after slaughter without stunning. Though this problem was mainly associated with the
inverted position, it occurred with the upright position for both Halal and Shechita slaughter (Gregory et al., 2009). The authors examined bovine respiratory tracts following Shechita and
Halal slaughter without stunning, and also in captive bolt stunned animals. During all the
treatments animals received the cut in the upright position. The study found blood lining the
inner aspect of the trachea in 19% of the Shechita, 58% of the Halal and 21% of the
stunned/cut cattle. Blood was found in the upper bronchi of 36% of Shechita, 69% of Halal
and 31% of stunned/cut cattle. Ten percent of the Shechita, 19% of the Halal and 0% of the stunned/cut cattle had fine bright red blood-tinged foam in the trachea. Blood covering the
larynx was recorded for all cattle. It was concluded that concerns about suffering from airway irritation by blood could apply in animals that are either not stunned before slaughter or do not lose consciousness rapidly whilst blood is present in the respiratory tract (Gregory et al.,
2009). These concerns are based on the fact that fluid in the respiratory tract in conscious
animals leads to irritation of sensory receptors lining the airway, and in particular the
receptors on the glottis and the carina of the trachea. In animals with intact vagus nerves there
could have been a cough or expulsion reflex, but coughing would be absent when the vagi had
been severed (Canning, 2007) though lower airway irritation may still occur through
sympathetic-spinal afferent pathways (Quin et al., 2007).
Again animals are put into these restrainers by hand and the head is supported
by hand during and after the cut. Sheep have been observed shackled by one leg (Catanese et
al., 2009; Cenci Goga et al., 2009) before sticking for Kosher slaughter (up to 17 kg
liveweight, line speed exceeded 200 sheep/ h) and for Halal slaughter (sheep up to 55 kg
liveweight, line speed could exceed 150 sheep/ h). Shackling time averages ranged between 1 and 4 minutes before performance of the cut, but can reach 5 minutes if the time was needed to sharpen the knife or if the operator had to approach first to perform the cut. During
shackling before sticking some sheep hung calmly whereas others struggled. Struggling was
increased if a sheep touched another struggling sheep. Sheep reactions also included turning the head to the side and apparently looking around, kicking with the hind leg and vigorous struggling including movements of the whole body. In the last case, the movements were thought to be escape behaviour. Struggling and vocalisation sometimes occurred in response to the cut.
Vocalising in sheep sound like a child screaming MAAAAA for its mother, it’s eerie and almost human.
Keep eating halal and telling yourself it’s okay.
The whole paper is kinda like that. The animals beg to be let go, that’s probably why they like it.
Other methods are to place the bird in a cone before performing the cut or placing the birds in lateral
recumbency for Halal slaughter. According to Dialrel experience, restraining poultry for
Shechita was performed manually or by shackling chickens and turkeys before cutting,
although the latter was not according to kosher rules. During shackling chickens could hang
calmly or show wing flapping which in some cases was vigorous and long lasting.
Less suffering huh?
Including Halal Tufano. Don’t buy from him, he doesn’t even put it on his FAQs.
“The lack of honesty and accountability in the current market for naturally raised animal products has driven me to provide people a product they can find their true health with.”
“We will be sourcing meat from farmers raising animals for us to these quality standards.”
Highest quality Halal cuckery. You have to write to him before he’ll admit it, which is illegal.
“Halal signage be displayed where an establishment sells both halal and non-halal products”
As is that. He doesn’t label and it’s meant to be per product like with allergies.
Trust no cuck, [bonus gifs at end] you actually have to seek this out even from people who pretend not to be snowflakes. It’s sad I know this legal side and Americans don’t… or pretend not to. No document disclosure either.
NEW YORK “All food items must also have a halal label affixed to them when they are packaged and being sold as such”
You know they have to hire Muslims to do it too right?
“Slaughter by a Muslim”
So they’re isolating the food industry from Westerners.
When sheep are group stunned in a pen, they may hide their heads under animals which makes it difficult to correctly place the electrodes.
The average number of cuts as reported by Gregory et al. (2008) was 3.2 cuts during Shechita and 5.2 cuts during Halal slaughter of cattle.
The one cut propaganda is a LIE.
In sheep, according to the experience of the Dialrel WP2 members, the minimum number of cuts required to sever the major blood vessels of the neck for Halal (without stunning) and kosher slaughter ranged from 1 to 6. For cattle
either one or up to 60 sweeps of knife have been found.
Up to 60.
Religion of cruelty.
For poultry usually one cut was
performed. Additionally to multiple cuts, after withdrawing the knife from the wound, additional cuts were sometimes performed during Kosher and Halal slaughter. Each time the
knife touches the surface of the wound the potential exists for further nociceptor activation.
Even if the knife blade is twice as long as the width of the throat, there are limitations to cut the neck of large cattle with a small number of cuts. This is due to the fact that according to
the area to be cut the length of the blade increases disproportionately depending on the
pressure that can be applied by the operator (Adams and Sheridan, 2008).
Especially in sheep but also in cattle an additional aspect may be thick wool or coat, which
may have to be parted before the cut. Otherwise this would constrain the blade during cutting
and could cause blunting of the blade. Blunt blades are especially welfare relevant if the neck
is not sufficiently stretched to fixate the flexible skin around the neck of sheep or cattle
(Wenzlawowicz and Holleben, 2007).
As for the painless lie, will you settle for EEG?
Measurement of the electrical activity of the brain to assess noxious stimuli has been described in chapter 2.6.2. Recent advancements in electrophysiology have allowed quantitative analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) in response to painful/noxious sensory input, allowing the experience of pain to be more precisely assessed in humans and animals. This methodology has been applied to the question of pain during slaughter of calves by ventral-neck incision. In a series of experiments the results showed clear evidence for the first time that the act of slaughter by ventral-neck incision is associated with noxious stimulation that would be expected to be perceived as painful in the period between the incision and loss of consciousness (Mellor et al., 2009). First the use of changes in the EEG
power spectral and a minimal anaesthesia model was validated for the assessment of noxious
sensory input using amputation dehorning as a noxous stimulus (Gibson et al., 2007). Then
the model was used to investigate the impact of ventral-neck incision without prior stunning (Gibson et al., 2009b). The results demonstrated that ventral neck incision produced changes
in the EEG indicating that it was a noxious stimulus and therefore could be perceived as painful in conscious animals. This was then confirmed in the second study addressing the
question whether the EEG responses after ventral neck incision were due primarily to the
cutting of neck tissues or to interruption of blood flow to and from the brain. The results demonstrated that the predominant noxious stimulus was cause by the transection of neck tissue not the loss of blood flow to and from the brain (Gibson et al., 2009a). In sheep there is
no direct EEG data that demonstrates pain in response to the cut, however based on the physiological similarities between sheep and cattle, it stands to reason that the neck cut in non stunned sheep will cause pain (Hemsworth et al., 2009).
The animal cruelty people are right on this one. This is why we fully stun.
Nerves severed during the neck cut have been described by Gregory (2004, page 96) to be able to proceed signals for up to 4 seconds.
A lifetime in neuroscience. The time dilation of the stress alone would make it seem like five minutes.
Direct activation of neurones during transection of
the nerve results in an intense but brief injury discharge in the afferent nerves. The overall
effect is likely to be a sense of shock, comparable to an electric shock.
Uhuh…. convenient metaphor.
Subsequently, undamaged nerve endings and also nociceptors in the neck wound respond if stimulated or disturbed especially from cold drafts and mechanical effects depending on the way the wound is managed before consciousness will be lost (Gregory, 2005b; Gregory, 2004). Nerve
conduction velocities ensure that activation of brain centres following major cutting injury occurs within milliseconds. Therefore, the potential experience of pain is directly relevant to
the events following the neck cut (Hemsworth et al., 2009).
During the Dialrel spot visits even under apparently optimum conditions, reactions to the cut as vocalising or exhaling (as long as the trachea was intact), retracting movements, struggling or shivering have been found especially in cattle during Halal and Shechita slaughter without stunning in both turning pens and upright systems. Reactions in sheep have been observed as
struggling directly after the cut but also shivering. Reactions of poultry have been retraction movements and wing flapping.
You can’t pretend it’s better.
In conclusion it can be stated with the utmost probability that animals feel pain during the throat cut without prior stunning. Whereas the actual cut itself can only be evaluated using behavioural signs, questions remain about standardisation of cutting techniques. Because in all probability animals are able to experience pain during and after the cut, the question of duration of consciousness is very important. This applies as well for a smooth cut performed
by a skilled operator.
Cut, singular? Up to sixty!
Risk factors for increased pain include increased number of changes of direction of the cut, increased number of cuts, wound manipulation (e.g. second cut), insufficient length of the blade, increased cutting time, a blunt blade, nicks on the blade, increased diameter of the neck, increased flexibility of the skin due to insufficient tension of the neck tissue during the cut, thick wool or coat and excitable animals.
Is there such a thing as a non-excitable animal?
Section 4.1.2 goes into loss of consciousness.
It is also possible that animals regain consciousness during bleeding (see chapter 2.8 and also below). The duration of overall consciousness is of particular importance
I’ll stop here, you get the gist.
I’m too disgusted.
some bonus Halal Tufano GIFs/vids, I have the video footage but can’t upload it here on this site.
“happy”? lying or deceiving?
Halal is also cheaper to produce because it’s so inhumane and has fewer equipment requirements.
I know film people and they send me videos, GIFs and stuff. The irony of those two clips together with the same Old Hollywood aspect ratio was amazing.
Edit: They told me about this …thing and uploaded it for me, pasting links, hope this works. We pass around videos like this all the time and have a right good laugh about it so ignore the count. That was us before this post went live. He is Halal Tufano now.
You could probably edit some hideously gory Halal thing between these clips but I’ll spare you,
Shills, shills everywhere.
They also recently sent me this. If it looks like something Hollywood would produce, that’s because it is.
People with dark skin at those altitudes die of Vit D deficiency. Even in England, the NHS warn about this, let alone Sweden with even FEWER rays. How did their cranial morphology magically evolve, then?
Africans have zero Neanderthal DNA so pretty easy to test for. They have it? Not black.
There is plenty of proof of African-Asian mixing, however.
This explains their lower IQs in many nations, larger overall heads and stronger jaws.
HUGE lips, too.
Naturally the page tries to lie about white people as all magic albinos BUT the Asian part has this:
And morphology considerations:
Of the three crania Upper Cave 101, the “old man”, has been studied in more detail primarily due to its better preservation and clearly adult status. In comparison to modern East Asians the cranial vault is extremely long and low, with a receding frontal squama and marked angulation in the occipital region. The forehead is broad and the supercilliary region well developed. The nasal bones are pinched, with a high bridge, and the nose must have been more prominent than is common amongst living East Asians. The orbits are relatively low and rectangular, which is a common feature in terminal Pleistocene and Neolithic crania from many parts of the world. The lower border of the nasal aperture is gutted, which is customary amongst East Asians, Australian Aborigines and sub-Saharan Africans.
East Asians are just mongrels. They simply didn’t exist as we know them today and the modern Indian is typically a halfbreed with a Brit a century or two ago. This caused their ‘caste’ system.
All analysis of “Early Humans” in China, agree that the Mongoloid type Humans currently inhabiting the area, did not start to appear until quite recently.
But here the devil is in the definitions; we know that modern Chinese (Mongols) are a Mulatto/Mixed Race of Mongol featured Blacks like the San, their Albinos, the Albinos of Central Asians (who later became Europeans), and Blacks like the Jomon in Japan. But understanding just when these admixtures took place requires we know exactly what was meant by “Primitive Mongoloid” or “Evolving Mongoloid” and how is that different from Eskimo? (Not saying that Eskimo are primitive).
Any admixture was usually rape.
As was shown with the Peking man nonsense, many Albino and Mulatto Chinese are loath to admit that they derive from Africans. But the fact is that the Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, and South Asians, have all been scientifically proven to be Africans. Albeit, as is true in many places i.e. the Americas, the Middle East, etc. They are a mixture of Albino people and the original Native Blacks.
I don’t believe albino is a race, it’s a mutant and they’re often sterile.
But Asians do have substantial African morphology, you can see it in their face.
I feel like these people need to be beaten to death with a copy of Darwin’s Origin of the Species. Clearly they haven’t done evolving, the Left are distinctly unevolved now (maybe group IQ has something to do…) There’s so much Liberal Creationism I can’t even but it’s even tainting white genocide rhetoric now.
Remember when society shamed stupid people? Me neither, before my time. I’m assured it happened.
Social media has become a constant parade of Stupid Pride.
Race aka ethnicity =/= Citizenship
There’s no such thing as British, an old colonial idea that died out with WW1, sealed in WW2.
A passport doesn’t change your DNA, your legal heritage and birthright.
If Europe is so great, why move here?
Activates the almonds.
If I identify as a billionaire does the bank have to alter my balance to match?
And immigrant is the modern word for colonizer. They were there for ‘a better life’ and to ‘make money’. There’s a French colony in London, accept it. It’s a national thing, more specific than race, a soft invasion. Ironic that London is the most colonized city in the world now. You could meme it actually. They’re even trying to over-ride our native political process – like a colony.
If it walks, talks and censors like a colonialist…. it’s a colonialist.
We really need to drive home how anti-Darwin this all is.
The antithesis of creationist equalism is Darwinian survival of the fittest.
They act like there’s intelligent design but what about making us all with varying IQs? Within a group too. And why do schools still grade if we’re all the bloody same above the neck?
CUT OFF LONDON’s ACCESS TO ENGLISH TAXES.
CUT OFF PRIVILEGED LONDON SOCIAL HOUSING.
You have no right to live in rich London at taxpayer expense.
It used to be a smug “where’s the statistics to back that up?” now infantile screeching like you took a toddler’s toy.
Don’t shoot the messenger, you can’t help domestic abuse victims in mixed race marriages by ignoring their existence.
A prophetic book about the future and about God punishing non-Christians. …For disbelief. Not even Christians doing it. God.
If this is maintained, we have precedent for deporting immigrants already here for having violent religions.
Whatever their actions.
So they believe enough to have an official opinion (treat it as real) as the state (illegal, no separation) but disbelieve it or flout its tenets, making it blasphemy but legally hate speech.
So by insulting Christianity, the leader of whom is their monarch and employer, they’re guilty of hate speech.
And questioning the legitimacy of the Queen, which is treason.
I hope for legal reasons all people processing claims are atheist, or all their decisions have bias and become void. Again, deportations must occur. To correct corruption.
However, not every Christian can move here, there are plenty of closer alternatives he’d have a legal right to.
Apparently, we DO have a right to protect our borders? Interesting.
But is it really your border, politicians? If you were allowed to immigrate without the will of the people, you too can be deported for genocidal invasion. Foreigners are inherently biased on deciding whether to let in foreigners.
They also did this to oppose the claim of Islam being violent… despite evidence. Including murdering the guy claiming this. Which makes them directly responsible for his murder.
The ongoing Christian genocide, especially in MENA, is hardly a phobia.
It’s genocide. Christians of every colour, being punished for their religion.
You cannot “turn the other cheek” to people who wanna kill you.
To crazy people who want to bring about the Apocalypse by spilling the blood of innocents.
You kick them out, after stopping the funds to incentivise their breeding.
Child brides must be ruled null and void. Minors cannot consent to marry.
Circumcision must be banned as child mutilation, which it is. If the son wanted it, they’d get it aged 18.
Label ‘Halal’ and ‘Kosher’ by law so atheists can avoid the products. They either don’t stun or insufficiently stun the animals and thereby are already illegal under animal abuse laws.
Sharia courts are already treasonous as a parallel legal system, as are interest-free loans only available to Muslims (when Christians oppose usury too).
Vote rigging must be exposed. Getting imaginary relatives, dodgy postal votes and people who don’t speak English to ‘vote’ must be stopped. Intimidation, religious leaders telling people how to vote, must be punished.
Is Sargon doubting multiculturalism now?
Does he ‘believe’ in IQ now?
How about the child rape, cousin ‘marriage’ and child ‘brides’? Are they ‘free’ to do that in his libertarian lefty paradise?
How about IQ/aggression correlation? Any proof?
Don’t let up on reminding these people how naive they are, to assume the world is a 120IQ middle-class white male with no criminal or deviant tendencies. The world is not WEIRD.
There are always witch trials with these sorts of things. Slowly, at first. The ‘sharia police’ going round London were never punished, which makes it legal. The Muslims have a special group for working in the police, that’s illegal – blending religion/state. Various ‘charities’ do illegal things, expose them.
I suggest you start by going after the academics who pushed for ‘phobia’ blasphemy laws as serious and violent.
Like feelings + Muslim = special privileges. Their ‘hate’ isn’t illegal, but taxpayer sponsored! Non-Muslims are second-class citizens, even the rich Jew who lost London mayor to anti-Semitic rigging. The Jews polluted their own narrative and replaced themselves. Labour is no longer a working-class party, another should be founded/allowed (we actually live under fascism+socialism) and the new Article 4 is essentially anti-democracy, it has no place in a party here. Tony Blair hasn’t been shot for war crimes and his treason changes somehow stand. For now.
If the academics responsible for this mess backtrack, it’ll affect legal proceedings and avoid disaster.
The other thing is tax the spices. Seriously. They hate the local food. The illegals would leave. Just do expensive ‘safety’ checks before letting it in the country because so much is adulterated and properly tax restaurants. Under ‘green’ principles, importing spices should accommodate the cost of oil in carrying it over, as a luxury good. Spices are actually medically bad for you so the NHS should be onboard unless it wants extra gastro patients on its books.