I’d like to say I’m surprised…
I’d like to say I’m surprised…
via The Kids are Alt Right VI
It’s like General Patton said
read the whole Bible, not just the parts you like or agree with.
I decided I need to explain more fully. I’ll be brief and short on proof because you can literally just Google-fu most of it, seriously. It’s literally history. This is about connections. Credit me, biches.
Manwhoring as it’s now known might’ve decided the course of modern history. Fornication is forbidden by the Bible, but nobody asks the punishment for unmarried men?
Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.
First of all, art history. No, really. Seriously, look.
Jesus, right? White Jesus. Regardless of your opinions on the genetics and hue of the region at the time, there is a typical Renaissance image associated with Jesus from this period. It’s oddly youthful and mercurial.
Except that isn’t Jesus. The White Jesus iconography is based on one of the most despicable men in history, the basis for Machiavelli’s Prince. It was based on the bastard son of the Pope, Cesare Borgia.
This Spanish, incestuous piece of shit. Read around about it, he’s worse than Hitler. He deserves to have his name spat on the way people do about Hitler now.
Instead, we continue to depict his likeness as The Christ.
Who did this portrayal? Leonardo da Vinci. Paid by the Catholic Church, headed by… a Borgia. His father.
There’s vanity and then there’s demanding someone paint your son as the Son of God, Saviour of Man.
It’s some Alexander-level egotism. Alexander the Great claimed to be a demi-god too.
Before people could read widely, they read paintings, symbolically.
But that which is made with hands is cursed, as well it, as he that made it: he, because he made it; and it, because, being corruptible, it was called god.
I don’t trust Catholic statues for this reason.
They’re creepy. Paintings, fine, but a statue? An idol? No. No, thank you.
I’m pretty sure there was a story about that.
There’s an interesting story that this mystery ‘model’ might be Judas too, twisted by time and sin.
Ugliness, the wages of sin. They do appear similar, perhaps a reference to Cesare’s public and private face?
Cesare is mentioned by name preceding its most famous and misquoted passage.
Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with.
The full passage is eye-opening indeed.
fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails.
Speaking of the mask of celebrity.
OT: Machiavelli and Leonardo da Vinci were friends, Assassin’s Creed was truthful.
They tried to collaborate on a river project, what a mash-up.
Why wouldn’t they discuss Cesare, both involved in the constant war of the time?
Machiavelli wrote the Prince to curry Cesare’s favour by praising his decisions.
Medici money had its limits, unlike the Papacy. Gold thrones, y’all.
Truly, it should be known as Cesarism, not Machiavellianism.
Anyway, the rampant sexuality of the Cardinals, up to and including the Borgia Pope himself, have given it a reputation that continues to this day with paedophilia scandals (women were banned from most of the Vatican).
“At present, Vatican City is the only country where men but not women have voting rights.”
I mean, there are books about this stuff. Do I need to keep linking fact or can we crack on?
TLDRBooks: Cesare caught syphilis in 1497. It might’ve made him more evil, a feat supposedly possible.
To avoid going into hiding like possibly, literally Hitler, he wore “a leather mask covering half his face (disfigured possibly by syphilis during his late years).”
If only men weren’t crazy about pussy, eh? Far more evidence they’re the hysterical ones, isn’t there?
Maybe that’s why we call it his-story? It’s the story of STDs, r-selected men being the primary carriers.
Fast forward to Henry VIII. He had the ‘French Disease’, syphilis. Nobody knows quite how, he got around. Is it a hint if I hyperlink?
To escape France and it’s pimp hand, The Pope, Henry formed the Church of England (colloquially C of E), which doesn’t hate women, allowed him to marry a prettier one, allows the book of Common Prayer in a common tongue and doesn’t take all your beer money overseas to keep the sexual deviant who gave you The French Disease in silken socks.
This would explain why Elizabeth wanted to keep her wits about her and remain a Virgin Queen.
The nobles shared prostitutes and wives, they were pretty much all infected with something.
That’s why their babies kept dying. On top of everything.
Who worked for this French deviant? Why, Leonardo!
Who might Anne Boleyn have met at the French court? Leonardo, again.
Where does syphilis spread fastest? Well, much like HIV, homosexuality in men, again.
We do know a direct descendant was of that persuasion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_III_of_France#Sexuality
And we all know the French court was decadent, almost manic, grandiose and well, a bit loopy.
Symptoms of the French Disease.
Mad King Georgey had some type of ailment but nobody can pinpoint what exactly.
Seemed a little bipolar, mouth watering,, difficulty seeing, bit loopy…
Syphilis is also known as the ‘great imitator’, looking like many diseases to the untrained eye.
It’s a matter of psychiatry in the latter stages. This didn’t exist.
Where did this dread disease come from? Why did it suddenly get through Europe?
Well, the French disease, isn’t French. It was actually brought back by Columbus’ crew from America.
Why can’t men keep it in their pants, seriously? That’s much worse than measles, smallpox and flu.
It’s the Renaissance HIV, it might’ve ended the Renaissance as we know it.
However, it took up permanent root in the French court swiftly (homosexuality marks out the French, free lovers) and might’ve been the hidden cause of the decadence that led the French people to guillotine them.
Some of those symptoms may be familiar.
The court in which Louis XIV grew up in definitely saw syphilis as a sign of god’s wrath for a misspent life.
By 1736 the problem had become so imminent that Jean Astruc, royal physician to Louis XV, wrote one of his greater works on the disease.
It can be passed onto children if the pregnant mother catches it from the father.
Fast-forward again to the modern day.
It’s returning because middle-aged men can’t keep it in their pants. AGAIN.
It has come back to Europe, like TB, with mass immigration and promiscuity of former debauched eras.
We are the age of super-gonorrhea. I’d suggest either of these as candidates for Gay Germ theory.
Thanks, Sexual Revolution!
The feminists lost the plot when they denied the unique female power of maternity. Men kill men, women kill their babies. Men kill their future babies and drive their women hysterical with STDs (see Lincoln’s wife).
The true sexual revolution were the libertines, extreme hedons.
They only came about after the introduction and spread of syphilis into Europe.
Wait, does Britain have a Mad King in modernity?
There is a rumour about Charlie’s adultery. A certain infection Camilla might’ve picked up at school that ravished her looks early… God’s wrath indeed.
“There was also the obvious concern that the king or queen would not contract sexually transmitted diseases like syphilis, which was quite common through much of human history.”
I’ve written before on the fact STDs were considered evil because they were passed from whores to mothers, and on to babies, who they tend to murder. It’s like the male form of abortion. Lincoln’s children might’ve died because of his disease.
It’s almost impossible to keep any references to this online for long, but it’s spoken of quite openly in London.
“It wouldn’t surprise me.”
Syphilis produces many of its third-stage neurosyphilitic symptoms with physical degeneration. It is found by autopsy, physically.
One symptom is weakened impulse control e.g. Ivan the Terrible murdering his own son in a manic fit of rage (mixed episode, clinically). This is also called hypofrontality. Porn addiction can cause it too.
Hypofrontality may be a temporary boon to creativity, a side effect of schizophrenia-like bursts of erratic mental energy, explaining the slutty artist who later loses it and tops himself.
How many lefties love meditation and yoga?
The ‘mindless’ trend? Brainlessness, celebrated by these people?
Transient hypofrontality is an (obviously) technical term meaning large portions of your prefrontal cortex have deactivated and brain activity is now dancing around various circuits.
THAT IS NOT A GOOD THING.
Frontal lobe is known to generally code for common sense, self-control, logic and reason.
Hypofrontality is heavily r-type, as a mode of cognition.
They don’t have anxiety, they likely have brain damage, by self-report.
I’ve leave you to these dark thoughts and hidden facts.
Throughout modern history, what if the women weren’t crazy? This idea only really came about during the Renaissance, when men became the lascivious ones.
What if they had an STD thanks to slutty hubby?
What if their own reasoning was twisted by the same?
What if this was passed through the seed?
What would be a great way to punish prideful man, that doesn’t keep monogamy or respect purity?
Drive his wife to madness and kill his babies.
I’m slightly ripping off Carlin here but he thought it was AIDs.
“maybe it could be spread sexually, making them a little reluctant to engage in the act of reproduction” source
We had syphilis originally, then HIV and now Ebola. All deadly STDs.
Who would be empty-headed enough to sleep around, despite these?
Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear [the guilty]; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children’s children, unto the third and to the fourth [generation].
What could do that?
Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
A microbe? A pathogen, maybe?
Between generations, biologically, that would mean sexually.
What would be a divine sign, if there were to be a plague on man?
The evolution of the natural world beyond the mastery of man.
Yes, it will be necessary to bulwark real communities from the coming darkness, whichever form that may take. Quite a beautiful metaphor, I believe we may have to adopt it.
By real, I do not refer to the covert doublespeak re our ‘foreign friends’ and their increasingly shrill demands. Those are standing armies, set on territorial expansion and rentseeking until the time comes to move as one and grab our reigns from our cold, dead hands. I try to leave melodrama until the times it is entirely truthful.
We cannot move. We should never be moved. The more territory we lose, the fewer resources we have, and the more time and choice they have in when to strike. And I think we can all agree, they will strike first.
Where do you think you’re going?
Tight-knit neighbours are the original soft police force. Expend your best emotions on those who deserve them.