Video: ‘Anti Social Justice: A Helpful Translation Guide’

I suppose this is meant to be ‘triggering’ to the likes of us…?

crying laughter lmao

At least she tried.

I reached out to her earlier today to try and come to some understanding, charitably offered to take down my two original posts about her. She blanked me, on tumblr no less. I can’t say I’m surprised. Here’s what I sent, I’m not ashamed of offering an olive branch, so she can’t lie about that too;

Hello I know this will seem strange but we all do strange things, don’t we? I’ve been thinking re these 2 articles specifically @ tinyurl codes: jdpyngk and jhhnrht I don’t think my intentions were made clear, I wanted to protect people from bad/harmful advice to their case, as long as you agree to implore people to seek a professional AS WELL, and ask me nicely, considering your troubles and suicidal state recently, I am willing to take these 2 posts off public view. Do we have an accord? DS x

Seems reasonable, no? Each mental health case is individual, experiental advice commonly does more harm than good. I made a simple request: That if you lecture people on medical topics, as psychiatry follows the Medical Model, you advise them to seek a professional?
Character limit meant I couldn’t put a question asking whether she actually wanted them removed (or maybe she likes the bump in traffic and someone to oppose? My numbers are higher than hers.) and that was why I put the ask nicely part (on tumblr those are done in reply in-system), because she may not actually want them taken down for whatever reason and we’re British, polite is how we roll. Omitting a please is like a punch in the face.

anyway moving on awkward 10 doctor what wut wtf

I’m bored writing about her, she has that much in common with Roosh I suppose, they both feed off the attention in some sense, hence his attempted dive into a new pool of potential BS buyers and her new series goading the people from the chans who see the label ‘SJW’ like a red rag to a bull.
I hope it becomes a form of trendy social signalling. Easy to spot in the wild, you see.

She gets it right at the end of this video, though. People in favour of what she calls ‘social inequality’ are in fact arguing for a meritocracy, which is race-blind, sex-blind, and like all true ‘justice’, blind to wherever you come from or what you are. Which SJWs argue is a good thing? While they’re pushing identity politics that refuse to let the various cards go (if we’re all human and nothing fine-grain, this is a category error to use incorrect labels like race) and use them as blunt rhetorical weapons against the dominant democratic structures. For example, see the recent hashtag #BritsSoWhite, whereas the musical apartheid of the MOBOs get not a hint of a negative mention. I’m so glad Twitter is gonna tank in light of this injustice, see why here: http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/why-twitters-politics-ultimately-doesnt.html
They don’t want equal opportunity, where results are ranked or stratified, but statist-enforced equal outcomes, and this requires dragging the more successful people down in the name of categorized peoples who can actually think for themselves and object, not that it matters. #NotYourShield

She’s doing a literal series, literally called Being an SJW, if any of you want a laugh. The comments on the above video are also quite something.

Remember the law: SJWs always project.
After introjecting guilt for existing. Ordering ‘check your privilege’ is a personal attack, calling someone bigoted, ignorant or evil, is a personal attack. It is defamation of character, the modern equivalent of crying Witch! or Heathen! Why do people feel threatened by SJWs? Who are you to deny their experience? Maybe the no-platforming scientists for doing science, threatening the livelihoods (getting people fired and blacklisted) and threatening the very lives (SWATing) of dissenters, sending rape threats to women (some previous rape victims) who are anti-feminist/SJW and rentseeking taxpayer money better spent elsewhere for problems that will never be solved because they don’t exist, cannot be falsified/verified to exist objectively and seem to exist to give Identity Crisis Studies majors an easy job, like Connie St Louis, who lied about her CV. Did she get fired for this fraud, where anyone else would? No. Such worthless people have nothing practical of value to add to society, so Crusade, with themselves as judge, jury and executioner. See monstering mobs on Twitter, which is supposed to be illegal. That’s why people are leaving Twitter in droves, the SJW plague. Authoritarian is too polite a term, not to mention inaccurate, as authoritarianism is conservative. They are totalitarians seeking to censor and oppress anyone who is Not Them. The insane people who say Newton’s Principia is a ‘rape manual’ and are literally anti-logic, because apparently logic is the invention of white men…

slatestarcodex.com/2014/09/30/i-can-tolerate-anything-except-the-outgroup/

I don’t think you should speak to her because I might get blamed but at least you can see what I have to put up with.

eyeroll jessica jones omg wtf shut up

Her fans keep coming here.
omg the comments…
all I did was highlight inconsistencies 
there were screencaps and references to social justice resources
#journalism

Video: Re hashtag #ThingsFeministMenHaveSaidToMe

I loved this hashtag. I even contributed toward it. I’m actually disappointed she didn’t do a whole 15 minute video reading those out, all of them were pure gold.

They're so stupid it's a laughriot
I loved this video. Unexpectedly. It popped into my recc. box.

There’s a scarily large amount of “Male Feminists” that are actually misogynists in disguise.

She’s 100% correct. I’m not beyond admitting that. We have that shared experience. They are massive hypocrites. They use the label “Male Feminist” like Captain America uses his shield.

Metaphor reconstruction;

I checked with 4chan for black ops, it isn’t one of theirs. This hashtag is real.

Think about it this way: if you were a misogynist, where is the place you would go to avoid the truthful accusation?

…..yeah. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masked_man_fallacy

The issue for women being the Catch 22;

  1. Say you’re a feminist. Now they own you.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
  2. Say you aren’t. Either they say you are anyway (If female, feminist)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic) or you’re an evil woman.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony#Dramatic_irony

A little advice to Claudia Boleyn

I was linked to this video:

Don’t bother watching it, she spends the entire time complaining and there’s nothing new. But still, I’d like to address an indirect reference (or few, so ambiguous they are) to this blog and give her a little good advice, since she is missing certain things that should be obvious.

1. Your eyebrows are fine now. Really, they look normal now. The only reason I mentioned them before is to help you ease off on using too much product, a common error and one ugly girls encourage to scupper the competition. In this video, you actually look the prettiest I’ve ever seen you but needed to blend the eyeshadow evenly. Giving you good makeup advice isn’t bitchy, I was honestly trying to help and you can see the results. People who know this stuff usually charge and I was actually trying to help.

2. Anyone who doubts you’re half-Indian is blind, you remind me vaguely of Merle Oberon. No, that is far from an insult. When I look at you I see a lot of potential and I was trying to bring that out with the advice since I have done plenty of successful makeovers in the past. I could give you more advice if you want but since you get distraught at efforts to genuinely help your image I’ll hold off in future unless asked.

3. If you want people discussing mental illness, and ask them to, you can’t get upset when they do it.

4. Threats are unacceptable, the rape stuff and the porn thing too, but I do find myself doubting your word without proof. If people are genuinely saying this stuff, then show us proof. On the milder stuff, maybe you’re misinterpreting?

5. You are not a therapist. There is a difference between giving people friendly advice and acting as if you have any authority on these issues as you have done, which was what my first post about you addressed. It was an ethical matter, not personal.

6. When you say you involved the police, you didn’t say why they dropped it and what was so terrible (the rape threats, the porn links, what was it?). Viewers notice things like that and the omissions made you seem frivolous, as if you were wasting their time.

7. The Internet is not a support group. A support group is a support group.

8. If you say silly things, people will point it out and laugh. You’re in your twenties now – I shouldn’t have to explain this, and while it is commendable that you keep comments open, I’ve seen you repeatedly ignore fair criticism and questions. Since you’ve ignored them, those people have gone on to do other things based on your material – that is the point of Youtube. It isn’t an echo chamber.

9. One of the most common criticisms I’ve seen against you is classism. You are ‘comfortable’ yet lecture on privilege – that’s the gist of it and quite fair, misusing the term “abuse” for such things doesn’t help.

10. If you think it’s hard now, hope you don’t get properly popular because the focus would become more intense. I’ve outright told people reading here not to bother you so I don’t know what else I could do.

Video: Culty Claudia

Imagine my surprise (and tbh, delight) when I saw this pop up in my recc. list. I found this guy during gamergate, he speaks a little too slowly (and monotone, but it’s a second language I think so give him a break) but the content splicing is epic.
On the subject at hand —

I assume I need no introduction Lestat IWTV film bamf

Usually people ignore her, after distorting the Nazi rape comment (really correction) by a *gasp* MAN! based on that little thing called history. She twisted a recognition of a hypothetical as a threat in the present. I dunno how unless she has a TARDIS stowed away behind that bookcase. I don’t blame them for ignoring her after that, it was a ludicrous situation. Yet there is a balance that if someone is happy to put their opinions on a controversial topic in a public video, inviting attention to it, they should be happy in turn if someone else is taking those seriously enough to do a rebuttal in a similar format.

I hope he’ll cover more like this, there is a small goldmine to be had from the sheer volume of implausible contradiction in her worldview. 2+2=5 shit. Surreal.
Posting for those wondering what dear Claudia’s up to nowadays (and yes, the gif use is a deliberate literary reference).

Claudia Boleyn video: “What is it like being a feminist online?”

I get forwarded these by people when she passingly mentions me. Those people are sadists because yes, I find her annoying but she’s a useful study in SJW. This time is quite momentous, don’t blame me for the post frequency it’s right of reply. She’s the more eloquent type of ditz than regular SJWs.

This is mostly direct quotes and you’ll soon see why. You can double check the video itself if you’re a masochist.

…I get misquoted a lot, I get a lot of people, …I get people sending me quotes, apparently quotes that I’ve said, which have never left my mouth or left my fingertips on my keyboard of my laptop ever in my life. Often asking me to explain my opinions on topics that I have no idea what these topics even are, I’ve never heard of these topics before, using words I don’t know the meanings of. So that’s really frustrating.

mean girls regina george that's really interesting sarcasm
Isn’t there a feminist meme? Educate yourself?

There’s a lot of misinformation floating around. …I mean I get enough shit for the things I do actually say so I don’t need the added help. …Sometimes it can be quite amusing.

That’s trolling. If you put out inflammatory content to get a negative reaction. Trolling.

…It can be amusing to see quite how many of these strange little people you are pissing off with your words and that gives me great strength to know that there are people out there that are so obsessed with me

obsessed with me mean girls regina george
~sigh~

that they’re on all my videos threatening to do these things to me. I’m clearly a big part of these people’s lives now, which is strange.

Most feminists limit themselves to the character limit of Twitter, this one is an odd specimen. The format change incurs a difference in response.

…That does make me laugh, so if you’re watching this video to those particular trolls… I hope that one day you manage to break yourself from the cycle of watching my videos if you hate me so much and you are able to resist the urge to send me misogynistic slurs and hate speech.

Your sub count would drop like a rock.

Personally, I find her videos comical. I pour myself a stiff drink. She’s confusing the people who actually threaten her (such as the rape thing, which is inexcusable) with every passive viewer (no direct contact) who disagrees.

…People compliment my eyebrows a lot.

Those people are not your friends. This mean girl behaviour is exactly what they are doing because it reduces your attractiveness as competition (or they have awful taste);

I was going to say something before because it’s so bad but it would’ve sounded mean, now you mentioned: Brow powder and gel to set is your friend, be subtle, it shouldn’t look like you drew them on with marker. While we’re at it, texturizing hair mousse combed through, stop applying blush on your cheekbones (not apples) and spring for highlighter liquid and contour powder and you need a sheer foundation applied by damp sponge because that one is too heavy. Lipstick choice is acceptable if too pink for your rose-toned skin but clearly applied from the bullet, buy a brush for shaping and layering. This is how you can tell I’m female although at one point she insinuates everyone in disagreement is “anti-feminist male.”
Resources, let me help you PLEASE:
http://www.therulesrevisited.com/2012/05/how-to-avoid-looking-fake.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/22/beauty-mistakes-scouse-brows_n_4642703.html

…I get asked for a lot of advice by people and this is really strange for me and it’s quite difficult for me because I really want to be able to help people and advise them but I’m no authority on anything… I’m really not the sort of person that people should look up to really, I don’t think, anyway, because I’ve mucked up so many times in my past…

That one single point is the entire reason, the ENTIRE purpose, of writing my initial post on you. To protect other people, vulnerable people and children/teens who might follow it without question. Since then it’s just been replying.

And I’ve had people saying that I’m pretending to be queer online,

Pretending? No. You aren’t straight. You’re definitely something else, I was quibbling over definitions of which terms were appropriate and citing Berkeley. I love how you were heteronormatively biased in assuming I’m normal myself. Identity politics leaves a bad taste, I take things on merit.
Misrepresenting yourself on a variety of different mediums, with proof written by you? Yeah. People are starting to notice when you say contradictory things. We are capable of critical thinking.

I’m pretending to be bisexual, that I’m pretending to be, um, pretending to be half-Indian.

I never said the Indian thing. Must be somebody else. It’s obvious she’s telling the truth there.

… And some of them can get quite obsessive which is quite worrying, because you know, like I said before about people that comment on my videos, these people actually go back through my videos I’ve made in the past when I was younger and stuff

You have a channel. The medium is intended for that specific purpose. Why do you make them and keep them up if they have an expiration date? At least you haven’t ragequit though.

and hunt me down online, like hunt down my various profiles online and try to get stuff on me which is really scary and I think it’s harassment really, it’s like online stalking and I think that’s very disgusting,

Wait, wait, hold up. You put the information up there. You wrote it. You put it there. Stalking involves invasion of privacy. There is no such thing as stalking information a person has chosen to share publicly to garner attention and public discussion on, it’s right to publicity we are helping you exercise, that ‘evil’ action would be called reading/watching. Reading self-uploaded content online isn’t stalking. Harassment? How? Where do you get this stuff? If you quit mentioning me, I’d quit replying to you. Happily. I’m kinda bored of you by now. I refuse to review anything to do with the mess of modern Who.

so I’m very wary of that and I’ve actually had the police involved.

WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK.
Is she trying to get on TV, is that it?
Does she know wasting police time is a crime?

I’m not gonna talk about that too much here

because it would make you look bad, can’t have that
they dropped it too, didn’t they
that’s also why
why did they?
hmmm?

but I have had the police involved with something like that before so yeah, I’m not afraid to report that kind of thing by the way.

she is very trigger happy with power, huh? Has anything actually happened IRL? Doubtful. Online stuff you block or avoid. It’s simple. And what about counter-suits? Have you considered that? Is your casefile that strong, to drag anonymous people (with a stronger right to privacy as non-Youtubers) out and withstand a libel suit for twisting their words or actions? Malicious prosecution suits? Again, I doubt it. Maybe try studying law, a topic you don’t understand, before running off to the police because someone disagreed with you beyond a ‘safe space’ echo chamber. There is no right to be exempt from disagreement, intellectual debate or offense. You cannot censor all criticism of your ideas which are not positive and completely yielding.
As I put it in another post: If you wish to discuss controversial subjects, you will attract controversy.

Just in case you are one of those stalker kind of people, you know, I will just go straight to the police so you know.

Sounds like a threat.
And accusing people of crimes they haven’t committed is slander. As I keep repeating, you are not qualified to decide certain things. Whether a person is a criminal is a judge’s job.
Would you go to the papers about it too? Cash in on an interview? That would be the ultimate test of whether you suffered any ill feeling. You see, if a person is truly stalked (I have been, I speak from experience), the last thing they would do is draw attention to themselves (police guidelines too) and give interviews about it (attentionseeking).

……Misandry’s like a joke that feminists have picked up on just to frighten MRAs and men that are particularly oppressive and full of bullshit.

It isn’t just white men, it’s all men, and it stretches back over a century.
You should know this. That is the history of the movement you support.

..They don’t seem to have the imagination to see outside of that so when they hear about feminism they don’t bother to listen to what we’re saying about society.

Maybe we like data and logic? > emotion, imagination

…They’re not actually misandrists, they just say it to scare those particular men and it is quite amusing. Also women don’t actually have the power for their hate to do damage.

This explains so much about how you operate.

(example of how there is no such thing as racism against white people)

Diverse of you. Inclusive. Tolerant.

Obviously I don’t hate men. If I did hate men, I don’t think it would be that much of a big deal really, to be honest …. I see a lot of male feminists, allies, I don’t know if they should be called feminists or not, that’s a debate…

There’s nothing else of value except for her elevator pitch to become a feminist like her.
The lack of agreement between women should actually be a good thing.

Feminist Claudia Boleyn’s new video: You can’t be sad because starving children in Africa and cancer

She came back with another gem. It’s just. wow. such wow.

I am mostly posting quotes because Claudia has really twisted herself into an SJW pseudologic pretzel and I wanna record this, most of it isn’t worth the 2 brain cells needed for a full personal commentary rebuttal.

Claudia Boleyn: The most annoying thing that people can possibly say to you when you’re depressed, mentally ill, or otherwise just upset. (title card)

Yeah. Breaking a nail is equivalent to real suffering. Everything is personal.

Is that supposed to make me feel better?

Yes, it’s called a sense of proportion and perspective. Gratitude? Humility? I’ve lost you, haven’t I?

I didn’t realize that only one person in the world was entitled to compassion and love and attention due to negative circumstances at one time. Do I have to enter myself into a competition for this title? Since when did our misery [DS: MISERY!] have to be measured against other people’s misery and come out on top in order for it to be valid?

Wow. This is super-awkward. They have literally no idea what they look like to normal people huh?

Do these people [these terrible, terrible people] have some sort of mental hierarchy in their brains where they rank everyone from one to ten on the misery scale? [Metrics are oppressive social constructs] Do they know [those complete bastards] how silly and nonsensical they sound when they say this kind of thing to people?

No. No they do not.
On a serious note, you’re supposed to be inspired by another’s success and composure. Alien concept to the hate brigade of envy.

More than one person are allowed to be in pain at one time.

Yes, until the Government passes a law against it.

There is more than enough compassion and love [and medication] in this world to go around or so I hope.

Nod and back away from the crazies

I find this argument really disrespectful to people with cancer –

wait, you don’t have cancer. Your opinion is worthless. #NotYourShield

-because they’re going through a traumatic time themselves –

in your imagination….

-and you’re just deciding to use them –

and what are you doing right now? Right this second?

-to silence other people who are also, perhaps, going through something quite traumatic in their own lives.

She was born in England so as a fellow Englishwoman may I just apologise for her completely. Every cancer survivor I know is humble and would never feel ‘disrespected’ by a metaphor that acknowledges the enormity of their suffering and its toll on their loved ones too.

She is comparing herself to people with cancer – to win sympathy. And an argument. Has anyone told her Nigel Farage had cancer? The man she said this about (click for source) –

farageclaudiacancerbeingabitchHow disrespectful is that, Claudia? What love and compassion you demonstrate. The man also survived a plane crash, watch this video-

– and continue being a bitch while pretending to support cancer survivors. Or doesn’t it count if the victim is a man because Patriarchy.

And then there’s those slightly racist undertones going on with that starving children in Africa picture.

The truth is no excuse, apparently.

I mean yes, there are starving children in Africa. That is correct.

Omg, Claudia. Slightly racist. Hey, we already knew. This same girl who also said: “I cannot think of a single instance of racism against white people. … It’s like a weird victim complex going on.”

Africa isn’t actually a country.

Nobody said it was.

Africa is a huge and diverse continent –

Wow, you have an atlas you looked at once. Africa’s a lot bigger than the old maps suggest actually.

-full of lots of different, varied types of people in various situations.

You could’ve stopped at Africa is a continent.

Africa is not

oh no

no plz

some far-off monolith-

like a whole continent?

made up of pitiful brown people that we white people-

wait, hold up, you said in other videos and media you aren’t white, you’re mixed race. You don’t get to hop the race fence whenever you feel like it. Man, such a liar. Example:

mixedraceclaudiaagainwhythelies-can use in our disaster and white saviour porn.

But you’re using them right now. If you feel bad about X, you must feel bad about Y. Emotional blackmail.

What I’m saying is that your feelings and emotions are always valid and that’s because you’re feeling them.

You haven’t studied OCD cases, have you?
Therapists, qualified people, say just because you think something or feel something, doesn’t make it valid. For example, say a kid has an intrusive thought about axe-murdering his parents. It isn’t real and he doesn’t need to treat it as valid. To quote PsychCentral; “I think it is worth mentioning here that the intrusive thoughts of those suffering from Obsessive Compulsive Disorder are often no different than the thoughts of so called “normal people.” But instead of just accepting their thoughts as “just thoughts” and letting them go, those suffering from OCD may attach too much validity to them, to the point of becoming distraught at the realization that they could even think such horrible things. This reaction can fuel the strong desire to avoid these thoughts at all costs.”
In a depressive context, validating every errant thought and feeling is one of the worst things you could do. It’s called rumination and it makes everything worse. *takes scholar beret off* Back to Claudia.

 

It doesn’t matter what triggers them off, if you’re feeling them, then they’re important.

How’s that approach working out for you, post-suicide attempt? Should you really be giving out advice when it works out terribly for you? Is that responsible?

Do not get wrapped in some person’s small-minded, ableist, patriarchal misery grading system.

Q: Who is more oppressed and miserable: a white woman, a mixed race woman, or a black woman? Are they equal or are they graded?

Silencing people –

in what context? Knowing when to keep your mouth shut is crucial to etiquette.

-and making them bottle up their feelings –

we have an NHS. You can see a therapist for the low low price of free.

-can only lead to misery –

stiff upper lip works y’know, not all of the time, but some of the time. #thistooshallpass

-and sometimes it does lead to death.

Everyone will die eventually. Life leads to death. You mean suicide. Does your belief system lead to suicide? Sure feels like it.

If more people felt comfortable talking about their feelings

#HeforShe was a bust

then less people would hit crisis point and there’d be much less suffering in the world.

Male victims outnumber female 4:1, MRA stat. Don’t mention it. Ever. You hate MRAs.

If we live in a society where people are going to be labelled as attention-seeking, selfish, manipulative or drama queens for expressing their true emotions then less and less people are gonna reach out for the help they need when they hit their breaking point.

There was no basis for that claim whatsoever. Or any of your claims, but that one in particular.
People are labelled for what they are. You can have a problem, but you can also handle it in a socially unacceptable way i.e. attention-seeking, like comparing yourself to cancer victims. *cough cough*

So ignore those emotion-policing bullies –

and we’ll continue to ignore you thought-policing bullies.

-and the next time they tell you you’re not allowed to express your sadness [around them, at that time, a request from politeness or a sense of appropriateness] because there are children starving in Africa or there are people dying of cancer [do NOT question yourself and ask whether they have a point, that would be the adult response] ask them exactly what they are doing to help said starving children [like paying taxes to foreign aid, you wouldn’t know about that, being a spoiled student most of your life] and people suffering from cancer [taxes, again, NHS funding, thank the rich] watch them mumble incoherently and get really embarrassed [bullying, you’re advocating bullying] and then cry all over them because clearly they hate the emotion [manipulative].

You have every right to feel bad sometimes [agreed] and you have every right to express that [no].

Claudia Boleyn, everybody. Using selective metaphorical cancer victims and Borderline personality manipulative bullying to win a row. Encouraging guilt-tripping others into unnecessary charity work as a lazy non-taxpayer living in rich London off family members. Here she is doing a baby impression #firstworldproblems;

claudia boleyn baby impression crying

Video: Feminist Claudia Boleyn discusses her experience of mental illness

I’m not making fun of this. If you’re looking for snark, this is not one of those posts. This is sincere.

You might wonder, why post this then?

It’s quite simple really. If you’re patient, this is an uncannily honest portrayal of comorbid mental disorder. This is the neurotic, intense tone and level of disclosure that ordinarily only a psychiatrist would hear and I find it worthwhile insight for this reason. If you need a practical application, I’ve noticed similar patterns of poor mental health among SJWs and the harder left. She makes a few mistakes, including the classic Generalization to the entire disorder or its theory, but I’ll overlook it.

n.b. I would appreciate it if no one sent her hatemail or the like from my linking of this, it’s a rare type of learning experience (whether you like her or dislike her as a person) and should be encouraged.

Feminist Claudia Boleyn’s 10 common misconceptions about feminism DEBUNKED

This came up when I was re-watching AVFM videos. Specifically this one about feminist shaming tactics, by a real woman.

“There’s no way they could’ve seen the video or read the post” (before disapproving of her or questioning her)
I get the feeling this is gonna be fun.

“I think it’s important to listen to what feminists have to say on feminism.” Deal. If you think it’s important to treat non-feminists as human beings capable of an equally free and justifiable opinion that happens to differ from yours.

She yaps on for ages about her personal blogs. Just plug them and get it over with.

“There are so many comments that think they’re arguing with me but they’re literally agreeing with me in different words.” ~ Claudia Boleyn

“We’re really not a hate group.” Except patriarchy. Already this is worthwhile.

1. Feminists are fat, hairy lesbians?

Stereotype. Without any studies on feminists, we cannot know either way. I would read such studies.
“Some of us are fat, some of us are hairy, some of us are lesbians.” So you’re saying it’s true. A stereotype needn’t apply to the entire group. Then she says she’s queer but not a lesbian.

2. Feminists hate men

Answer this: which sex is patriarchy? Which race? Which class?
“Feminists don’t hate men, feminists hate partriarchy.” So you are a hate group.
She speaks about it like a faceless entity. No, every group is comprised of people. Who are these people you hate?
“Upheld by men over women.” So you do actually hate men. Women cannot be patriarchy, so by hating it you can only hate men, the people behind the label.
She goes on about a “dangerous way of thinking” about traditional gender roles, those are based on women carrying the babies of the species. I will omit her little whines for clarity where they’re not funny.
“Feminists don’t hate men because they are men HOWEVER, feminists do have a hatred and a dislike for men that-” I’m gonna stop you right there. You don’t get to tell men what to do. Who died and made you Pope.
Misuse of Strawman fallacy.
She goes on to say if a man conforms to the behaviours she personally finds socially desirable, she (and feminists) won’t hate him. Oh! So the lucky few will be exempt from your hatred! How sweet of you! How gracious to spare them!
“The problem is that there are unfortunately a lot of men-” Yeah we get it. -“that don’t” We know. You want male slaves bowing to your whim. We know. “And yeah we have a lot of resentment towards them and that’s fair enough.” Would you castrate these men? Take away their symbolic and literal manhood? Serious question. Should male castration be a feminist punishment?
You say stereotype as if that makes it untrue. Stereotypes become so because they are generally true.
She keeps blaming the media. Granted, the MSM lie, but they can’t lie about everything. If a feminist does something wrong, they will reference it. It’s their role in our culture. That isn’t bad, it’s socially responsible in the public interest.

3. Feminists don’t care about men

You hate them by default because everyone in patriarchy is one and as you said a few minutes ago, you hate that. Hating is worse than not caring. “Liberation for women especially.”

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal ~ A fictional pig.

“Gender roles which are harmful to all people.” Then why do trans people have such terrible mental health? They’re the living experiment of what happens if you choose to ignore your biology. It fucks you up. Hey, who cares about studies, that show women are flocking back to the kitchen by choice? Your activism isn’t a finite resource. You are choosing to spend your time on women and exclude men, instead of making your activism equal in its support. “Although it isn’t about men and I really have to stress, it isn’t about men as a focus, it does help men too.” No evidence.
How do you define weak? A lack of testosterone or other key chemicals in the body? In which case, effeminate men are weak, there are differences in body chemistry. Is it feminine behaviour? That is a choice. Make feminine behaviours acceptable to both men and women and that would disappear. Except feminism tries to masculinize women, so you can’t do that.
The stiff upper lip applies to everyone. Crying at your work meeting about your lover chucking you isn’t acceptable behaviour for anyone. Does she have a bingo chart? Here’s a detour on gay men. “Surely having two men in a relationship makes it more manly.” Except studies prove you wrong. They aren’t in relationships, they’re man whores. Lack of ability to be monogamous isn’t effeminate. She talks about being free with emotions. I once read a great joke on tumblr;

“And be free from these horrible boxes.” What about freedom of choice? What if humans naturally gravitate toward greater wellbeing in those roles? Will you deny them? Does this include all value judgements? Freedom from success and failure altogether, the ultimate duality? Cos that’s Communism in a nutshell. “That’s a benefit to everybody” – who would’ve been a life failure and loser under any other regime.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.” ~ William John Henry Boetcker

4. Feminists think all men are rapists

– and never women. False accusations too? You missed those out, huh? I guess you just forgot. “Anybody of any gender can be a rapist, a woman can [bold mine] rape a man… anyone can be a rapist.” True in reality. Legally, only men because it requires penetration. Where’s the picketing to get that law revised? “The vast amount of rape is done by men” – reported. Reported by the usually female victim, processed in the system and taken seriously. You can’t claim a negative is true because the fact is self-report biased. If you count prison (if criminals are human), more men are raped. Truthburn!
“Feminists believe in the humanity of men.” You think men are human? Congratulations, you qualify as…. normal. Does victim blaming happen to men? Does it? You’re skewing this to be gynocentric. I know you won’t reply to this. It’d expose you as a fraud. Saying a man cannot help himself to sex is misandrist, men have free will. “We believe that men are just as intelligent and rational as women.” Science calls your bluff on that. The structure is undeniably different. Don’t think we didn’t notice the way you made it sound as if men were catching up to women, instead of the reality, vice versa. “Men should be held accountable for their actions the same as everyone else.” The same as women, you mean? Except women aren’t. Women have an easier time in the criminal justice system, laxer sentencing. Actually, most of the feminist rhetoric I have seen portrays men as default rapists (teach men not to rape) with no self-control, so they’re completely sexist, yes, I agree.

5. Feminists don’t have a sense of humour

“We just don’t particularly like jokes that make fun of (pause) oppressed groups and that bully them.” So it’s true. You seem to say a lot of things you believe in cognitive dissonance, without realizing that to an observer, you come across in a totally different, contradictory and ignorant way.
Do you make ‘jokes’ about MRAs? PUAs? Cis people? Straight people? White people? In multiple videos? That last: “They all kinda look like their souls have been sucked from them, two of the young women look dead because of poor editing… they appear sort of ethereal and grey [that’s racist] …. that’s the only reason you can have less charisma than the people in this video [bullying, not addressing their points ad hominem] … there isn’t a problem with Islam” [you’re a feminist, they’d have a problem with you] Multiple uses of “fantasy world.” You are not one to judge. “I cannot think of a single instance of racism against white people. … It’s like a weird victim complex going on.” Projection. “They don’t stand for anything really [contradicting self in X uses of racism card] I don’t actually think there’d be anything wrong with a world where there was a majority of people of colour” That’s genocide (UN), the definition includes race replacement and destruction of native culture (see: Native America). So officially, feminist Claudia Boleyn is in favour of genocide as long as it is of white people. On the video, she added a text bubble editing her own spoken, recorded words *a country in which. “It’s so poor it’s hilarious.” Classist. Need I add the term POC is offensive to white people? As if white people have no colour and aren’t people.

Explain why those aren’t bullying…? Again, who died and made you Pope? And hilariously, please do a video on your view of the European election results! Please do. For real. And another on neo-nazi hipsters. It’d be so funny. You’re like a village idiot: “I hate on people because hating on people is evil!” ~ subtext
“Satire points out how ludicrous the system is.” Yes. There are no limits on which system.
“There are a lot of feminist comedians.” And none of them are funny to normal non-feminist people (it’s a choice, not a default setting). Are you one of them? Please tell me all your stuff is a cerebral parody of social justice warrior princess.

all no none joke humour funny

6. Feminists have penis envy.

You do hate men (#2). Men are defined by humans that possess a penis and testes. If p | q.

You change the question. I noticed. Just because self-hating men called themselves feminist (see #2) doesn’t mean other non-penis feminists don’t hate men. You actually said words to that effect, the exemption. Only people without a penis can have penis envy, so changing the question to owners proves it correct. Womb envy is also a feminist theory, sure, miss it out. Sure, I guess you forgot. If womb envy occurs in Feminist Land, so must penis envy because p | q.
Rights are NOT positive claims.
#killallmen

7. Feminists want a matriarchy.

Do you want feminists in charge globally or not? If yes, that is a matriarchy and you want it.
“It would be a step up.” “We want…. there really isn’t anything wrong with that.” You want to take down a global system, which is anarchic, and you think there’s nothing wrong with it? There are no downsides to regime change or mass societal upheaval? No wars? No deaths? No rapes?

Many soldiers turned their guns against their commanding officers rather… than fight against the enemy. The retreat degenerated into chaos as soldiers looted shops and stores, raped peasant girls and murdered Jews. The collapse of the offensive dealt a fatal blow to the Provisional Government and the personal authority of its leaders. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers were killed.source

“I have to admit, it would be quite fun.”

8. Feminists are a hivemind

How else can you speak for all of them? “When they make a generalization-” Like everything you say? “However we do all share the view-” Then you are. You have the same view. Entirely. “We are sort of a collective, in that sense.” The dissonance is strong in this one.

9. Feminists are like the Nazis.

You are a fascist group. You want complete power with no one else allowed a say. You want an upheaval of all society to conform to your views. You want to police language. You want to leave no cultures alone to mind their own business (or businesses) and rip away natural laws with government totalitarian power. Fascism can be left-wing e.g. Stalin. Nazi stands for National Socialism. Socialism is left wing. The socialist tendencies of the Nazis are the ones being referenced e.g. the suppression of dissenting opinion.

“The Nazis oppressed and hurt a lot of people from this group. They killed people from my community.” Factually inaccurate. People in ‘your community’ aren’t old enough, they wouldn’t be talking about it and they wouldn’t be in your community now if they are, in fact, killed [your grammar]. You are not related to them in the slightest. The genetic line is gone, because that’s what murder is. You’ve never even seen a real Nazi and you’re daydreaming about what they’d do to you. The real Nazis wouldn’t have hated you, they had brothels for queer women. You could’ve got paid. To quote this fantastic takedown response video and this illogical gleeful post of yours on tumblr:  “They’d have passed you around like an ashtray.”
“The Nazis were quite patriarchal.” I must’ve misunderstood that sentence because it sounded as if you were saying present society, being patriarchal, is in fact Nazi. …Then why are you here?

10. Feminists are currently plotting to overthrow national governments and instead create a matriarchy (blah blah)…

She uses sarcasm to avoid answering: “That’s not a misconception, that’s totally true. Yeah you got me there.”
See #7. You want that. You admitted it seriously earlier. Question: do you want to destroy the concept of nation states? The communist belief that national divisions and loyal, patriotic unity of an indigenous peoples within a nation is damaging? Seriously, do you want multi-nationalism or nation state erasure to go with your multi-culturalism? Would you like to see us all living under the yoke of the Empire of the Glorious European Union?
“I hope I’ve given you the strength to go out and crush the patriarchy.” Is your father part of it? Grandfather? Great? Great-great?
I would say boyfriend but…. well. Or are you an asexual too, to add to your special trait list? Fish, meet bicycle.
“Loads of love.” I can feel it.

Feminist Claudia Boleyn’s Fake Queer video

I feel sorry for your father. Truly. I’m sure he’s a very decent, upright person.

“I don’t wanna give this person [woman, actually, hello!] publicity.”
Thankfully I know how to use the internet, I can have as much or as little publicity as I desire sweetums. And I don’t want traffic from people who think you’re a good source of life advice given your psychiatric background. Pretty fair, I’d say.

Note: I never called her a fake anything. Another lie.

Continue reading