Women shouldn’t be topless in public

Following on from-

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/04/10/women-used-to-be-ladies/

 

True.

Neither should men.

A solid century ago you couldn’t flash either.

In fact, you couldn’t even show your waistcoat at dinner, this was risque.

These were male thots. Note the closed body language, they’re uncomfortable.

While you’re applying clothing standards, remember they apply to both sexes. That is what we call a social convention.

No mini-skirts? No shorts!
Fact: Edwardian women wore shorts too, before skirts shortened to that length later.
As in, women showed leg in public – after men started it.

If I can’t show small children my tits, why can you flash them yours?
And if it’s purely a fat issue, are flat-chested women exempt? Must shapely bosom-ed men take up a bra?
It isn’t only women’s breasts that are sexualised in the media, is it, Mr Pecs?
If anything, women have more cause to expose than men, since our breasts actually retain a second biological function and constricting them is bad for the nerves, increases the breast cancer risk and weakens the ligaments that prevent sagging. Logically, none of the anti-feminist stuff checks out this time.

Exception: the beach, your bathroom. That’s it. Not BBQs, camping, whatever else.

If you think women can’t break out the sexist humour to justify this stuff as well, you are wrong.

A man’s place is in the shed with all the other tools.

“Women used to be ladies”

The latest meme making an irritating entrance into popular thought.

TLDR; read bolded.

It’s intended to insult clubbing culture (fine, ban clubs, otherwise, STFU about them).

Like most memes appealing to history, it’s misled at best, misleading at worst.

Rewind to the earliest times with video.
Ladies have fun too. Anything less is an overhanging lie from the Sexual Revolution.

“Yes but women used to be demure and coy, they didn’t dress and act like sluts.”

It is ironic the modern man has such a lax definition, as if looking at a man ‘the wrong way’ is slutty.

Women have always ‘made eyes’ at men, because we have eyes. When we use them, we’re accused of making eyes because studies show men are acutely sensitive to social overtures from women.


Maybe, just maybe, the nature of people doesn’t change much over time, and not everything is about you and how hard done-by you are? The term for that is a victim complex.
Look up the Evelyn Nesbit scandal, it was their OJ.
They even had versions of the Kardashians, pin-up girls before pin-ups, which really date back to the 18th century and painted adverts. If you believe any advert, it’s a de-facto IQ test and you lost.


Maybe read some social history before acting like you understand all women?

Especially those in other time periods.

^If that were true, you’d be a billionaire selling us bullshit. Advertising people understand people.

Funnily enough, women tend to be up on social history, so I find a meme that relies on our collective ignorance of it rather entertaining. The average woman knows as much social history trivia as a man knows military.

In perfect truth, such males want to castigate degeneracy without drawing attention to their own.

Let alone limiting it. R-types playing K.

This is intellectually dishonest, an argument based on bad rhetoric, bad faith, historical ignorance and makes for a coward. If you’re irritated that, in a world where sex is freer than ever, you still cannot get laid, perhaps the problem is not the people you fail to impress?

Maybe the problem is that you keep bitching like a gay guy.

Don’t look at a pretty woman and think the modern version of ‘ANKLE?!!!!‘ only to wonder why you’re labelled a creep and become a social leper. Offended people on this stuff are dull from birth.

Look and think ‘that’s nice’ and move on with your day because this superficial shit is not, by definition, important.

The women least likely to wear a miniskirt are prostitutes, because the goods are not given away for free.

Everything you know is wrong.

Ask a man with sisters if he judges their sexual desperation on what they wear.

Imagine if we applied the same judgementalism to men – all short-sleeve shirts are hereby signs of a gigolo. Shorts? Whore! Wear trousers like a proper man!

Only in the 20th century did it suddenly become acceptable (imho, no) for an adult man to wear shorts. It was considered ridiculous and you’d be mocked for it like turning up to a funeral in assless chaps, as was going topless until coal-miners striked because of job demands. This is the God’s honest truth. Look it all up. Shorts are literally the most immodest thing a man can wear, the male mini-skirt. It’s worse than a mini-skirt because things can play peek-a-boo. Short sleeves come in a close second and were taken up by the Italians with the sleeveless ‘wife-beater’ where they both should have been left, men couldn’t show their waistcoat at the beginning of the 20th Century.

Casual or modest, pick ONE.

I heard this meme from Clarey on YT years ago – he immediately began to criticize every modest fashion going, with an emphasis of vitriol for the maxi skirt. …That’s just a skirt. It’s a term for a proper skirt.

This stuck in my mind because I assumed it was a joke and waited for the punchline, the hypocrisy was so overt to a non-American. You have no idea what you want, but you know how much you want it!

He hated totally normal skirt lengths, pictured in the Edwardian videos, because it covered women up and he couldn’t ogle them, no more than five seconds after saying, to paraphrase- Why don’t women dress like ladies anymore?

The problem is male demand.

Male demand for risque fashions. Rappers are the main problem.

You can see how years of this from Kindergarten can make for avoidance of anyone who tries to pull it.

You can’t countersignal if nobody values your opinion to begin with. Look through the photos of the men saying these things and you’ll quickly realize they attract casual women because they are casual men. I haven’t seen a single one that owns a single (ONE) good suit. A good suit, by style standards and formality rules. Not a great suit, not an impressive suit, not an elegant suit, not a gentleman’s suit. A single decent item.

Which brings me to my next point: how do you intend to pay for that?

More fabric, more $$$$$. That is not a typo. A suitable wardrobe is 4-figures, a good one is five. This is based on wear and variety for activities. Being formal is more expensive, rappers lie.

Look at the guys making these claims about ladies. Are they gents?

Any woman looking at these guys will immediately notice the discrepancy, it’s like…

Which fork, Forney?

They have no clue of basic etiquette and try to prattle on like a stage mother.
They are alcoholics who couldn’t tell you the difference between a white wine and red wine goblet if their lives depended on it.

Nobody takes this ‘advice’ seriously. They have nothing to offer but opinion and personal complaint.

The funniest thing my society friends ever heard about women’s fashion was one drab man telling, loudly, anyone who would listen, that spaghetti straps were the sign of a slut.

This story still does the rounds and I’ve heard people quoting it without getting the joke.
Guess the nationality. Go on, guess. I think we all know.
Guess what he was wearing with his bad tan and fake Rolex he kept showing to people who could tell the difference.

These are the guys who refuse to buy a drink to assert interest (formal politeness) or buy a dinner they invited their intended to (the formal rule) but they want a woman with expensive taste?

Are you quite sure?

They slob around in t-shirts and shorts, in general, and wonder why the women draped in £3,000 Dolce don’t give them a second look. Class does come into it. The problem is, they have none.

Therefore, they refuse to see it as an issue…. because it IS the issue.

Women do not qualify to men. Eggs are expensive.

However, not looking like ‘Kevin the teenager’ helps.

Would you show up for a job interview wearing this? Are you using it for a sport? If the answer to both is NO, do NOT wear it out of the house and for the love of Christ get a good suit before you start spouting off on Patriarchy and the dire need of male leadership.

You don’t care how you look? Yes, it shows.

Hate sluttiness? Push to ban all contraception and sexual health clinics. Yes, all.

Hate immodest clothing? Push for Elizabethan clothing laws. Yes, in social history, there are many, many actual, literal laws that restricted things like length for modesty, and most women are aware of these. It would also mean strippers are illegal and you can’t pretend to be rich in clubs without actually being rich.

I don’t expect these guys to grow the balls, ..do you?

Conformity is a feminine virtue, as I mentioned earlier, so don’t blame all women for the actions or obscenity of singular examples, otherwise, all men are like Jack the Ripper; non sequiturs about men would be far more insulting.

Why aren’t women virtuous, they ask, not a virgin themselves.

Because none of the previous words will get through to ‘these’ people.

We mock idiots like you.

5 types of sexual coercion

A lot of men don’t realize that rapists often get a Yes on something else (foot in the door technique) then act like it means something else after the fact.

Just look at prison rape. You accept a free muffin at lunch, you’re later told you agreed to be their bed buddy.
That’s a male example of sexual coercion and men are rightfully terrified of it.

Coercion vitiates consent. It’s in the law, on the legal books.

https://www.bustle.com/articles/67926-is-it-rape-if-you-say-yes-5-types-of-sexual-coercion-explained

“You’re my wife/girlfriend, you are supposed to be having sex with me.”

A girlfriend owes you nothing.
A wife owes you something, but not constantly like a servant.

Many cultures teach us that sex is an inherent part of marriage. Many people take that a step further, and believe that being in a romantic relationship with someone makes you entitled to have sex with them.

They don’t believe that. Believing something doesn’t make it so. They’re lying to blackmail that person.

“You owe me” isn’t a belief.

The problem with that skewed thinking is that it leads some people to act as if taking on the label of “wife,” “girlfriend,” or “partner” suddenly makes your body their property.

I guess this relates to the idea of owning one another, which is true in a spiritual sense with spouses but doesn’t extend to constant entitlement, it relates to the idea that men always have to be up for it like robots and projects it onto the woman as her fault if he isn’t.

Unless you’re Catholic and never use contraception, it has nothing to do with Go forth and multiply, and has nothing to do with Christian duty. Prior to any duty, you should know what you’re agreeing to.

“If you don’t have sex with me, I’m breaking up with you.”

“If you don’t sleep with me, I’m going to sleep with someone else.”

“If you don’t sleep with me, I’m going to tell everyone you are a prude.”

In those cases it’s more obvious that nobody should be sleeping with them because they’re immature.

If Mommy won’t let me have the toy, I’m gonna smash it.

Attractive.

If they don’t respect your No, they don’t respect you or your body. Leave immediately. Run, don’t walk.

Logically, they shouldn’t respect a Yes either, if they doubt your ability to consent. Think about it.

What’s the subtextual thought process here?

You’re not allowed to say No to me.

ding ding crazy

run

whatsjwsimagine

Blackmail doesn’t apply to any agreement, including written contracts.

“If you really loved me, you would have sex with me.”

That isn’t love, that’s prostitution. A prostitute pays for things with sex.

“I wouldn’t have taken you out to dinner if I knew you were just leading me on. If you didn’t want to sleep with me, you shouldn’t have been flirting with me either.”

Again, (tends to be) male entitlement. Neither sex is owed sex.
That’s a non sequitur. If they didn’t want a date, they shouldn’t have asked for a date. That’s the real logic.

Don’t then complain that you thought (lie) it meant ‘something else’, like a ONS assuming it’s now a relationship. But that’s female entitlement, so they’d probably agree if the example isn’t close to home.

It is very easy for someone to try to ply you with alcohol as foreplay to a sexual encounter — because they know that if they can “relax” you enough, you may drop your resistance due to your impaired judgment, and agree to have sex. If your partner knows that you don’t want to have sex, and you find them repeatedly topping off your glass

that would be the point to tell them to go fuck themselves

If you find yourself saying yes to sex as a means to avoid harm, then there is no excuse for your partner’s behavior; please consider talking to someone and getting help.

The police, because sex is not a form of appeasement.

No seriously, many date rapists use these tactics because it gives them more plausible deniability in court later.
I once heard of a serial rapist who’d lure women to alleys threatening to hurt them while a friend played lookout then he forced them to say they wanted him before raping them. Eventually he got caught. Eventually.

The ‘game’ of getting the woman to agree is part of the sexual thrill, because they can take that choice away from her too.

A No doesn’t change into a Yes. That’s called nagging. The coercion thing isn’t widely known although rape by fraud is old as the hills, so the rapist also assumes they’re covered as long as she says the ‘Magic Word’ (until they’re in front of a judge).

There isn’t a magic word that makes rape OK. That’s kinda the point of rape, taking, as in taking away.

Date rapists are harder to catch because the women involved believe it was their fault and he isn’t like that with others (he is). So yes, report it. Others might not get away and you can do everything right and still get raped if they drug you (that’s why date rape is yes, actually, very real, and anyone who tries to argue otherwise is flagging as one of them).

Rapists fear healthy personal boundaries.

Update: I’ll throw this here.

http://www.cracked.com/blog/how-men-are-trained-to-think-sexual-assault-no-big-deal/

Stalking isn’t romantic.
Harassment isn’t brave.
People don’t owe other people anything.
There are no excuses for shitty behaviour.

I cba to go into this one.

Short version – women are not men and don’t have male libido, even porn stars aren’t really into it/you.

It’s stupid to assume all women are coy like some 19th century Austen novel and further, coyness is lying. Coy women don’t sleep with you. It is exclusive from sluttiness. Sluttiness is anti-coy. But I guess that wouldn’t make porn as fun to watch.

There’s no such thing as playing hard to get. You’re either hard to get or easy.

Imagine if we flipped it and said everything men do, they do for female attention and approval. Good career? Wants to attract a good woman. Nice car? He can’t appreciate cars for themselves, it must be to get women. Nice body? He doesn’t care for his health, it’s all about us. It’s incredibly narcissistic and spoiled to assume the choices of others have ANYTHING to do with you.

It’s also sexist to assume that clothing choices based on temperature e.g. male shirtlessness, female mini-skirts, or other practicality, have anything to do with their moral character.

Adult men have no excuse to think as stupidly as teenage boys.
They want an excuse for their actions, they want someone else to blame.

comment

I don’t have anything much to add to this except to say that I do really appreciate the article. It is frustrating to deal with guys who simply refuse to accept ‘no’ as an answer, because there is no way to ‘really’ refuse once ‘no’ is off the table. Short of fleeing the scene, what the f**k can you say?

That’s the point. It’s a trap.
They think if they can rationalize it, it isn’t rape and you’re the ‘crazy’ one.

Ahh, gaslighting again. Notice how this often crops up with the shit of the species? Because obviously, it can never be sociopath/borderline/plain jerk’s fault. You know, the consequences of his actions. Like a man. You push him away, kick him, bite, scream or punch him? You’re a crazy bitch! But him initiating physical action goes unmentioned. It ‘doesn’t count’ as assault, in his mind, because his consent to your body over-rides your human rights. They never mention what they did just before and claim not to see anything wrong – but they don’t mention it unless forced. This is why they rarely harass women in the company of other men – they know it’s wrong and fear punishment for the crime. This is why they usually stop hassling a girl if she says ‘I have a boyfriend’ (women have to lie to be left alone, minding their own business alone, in public. In the West). They’re cowards trying to exert control over others, women are simply the sex less physically equipped to defend ourselves.

They think No means Yes and Get Lost means Take Me I’m Yours – a Disney cartoon figured this out.

They don’t really think that, they’re pushing their luck and the boundaries of the law.

No means No because that’s literally the line. That’s the legal line we shouldn’t have to reach when there are other forms of rejection men are willfully blind to. It’s been proven men assume sexual interest where there is none. It’s a defect in their programming. However, ignoring many indicators to the contrary (emotional intelligence) isn’t an excuse. Women are people, first and foremost, and respect should be given when asking anyone for anything, since you are in the position of desire and need them to oblige you.

The whole tone of that article is a theme I call Poor Men, via Women.

Wtf.

How enlightened, feminist guy.

You’ve gone from acting like a black guy (where all this ‘sexual culture’ comes from) to just a plain misogynist, who can’t understand that women aren’t billboards for male attention. via People is terribly dehumanizing as a message.

It isn’t about you.
It isn’t about you.
It isn’t about you.

Assumptions make a what?

The feminists do the opposite, like Emma Watson signalling Poor Women, via Men. Still wrong, still sexism. You don’t self-actualize or seek attention/sympathy via the opposite sex. Or any other people, really. Your business is yours, not every stranger who piques your fancy.

OT

We seem to have a form of sexual politics like consensus reality. There’s no such thing as consensus morality. Let’s assume coercion doesn’t apply for a moment. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Two people can agree to something, doesn’t make it less wrong. Evil can be mutually agreed. So no, getting a Yes doesn’t get you off the hook for what you choose to do with your own body.

Hipster food now cultural appropriation

Good. Finally, they’re following their own bloody rules.

http://civileats.com/2016/03/31/beyond-talk-the-search-for-real-solutions-in-the-conversation-about-food-and-cultural-appropriation/

https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/09/are-the-writers-of-food.html

Next up, styles of makeup (stop painting it on to look like a different race, it’s creepy) and period or country-specific clothing (if I can’t wear a toga or a kimono, fine, but you can’t wear tweed or English Rose dresses). The Asians are worst for this, they signal with all the European culture, even the chavvy crystal tat. But if you wear one Indian silk thing that an Indian person TOLD YOU to wear, they walk up to you and start the verbal abuse train. Choo choo I don’t think so you hypercritical superficial prats.

detour

Living in a monarchy, seeing Asian tarts wearing Princess tiaras with all the hashtags makes my blood boil. I actually want to break out #my culture is not your costume hashtags at that. The people cosplaying royalty always look like the help. Beyonce was the funniest because she was so deluded and ignorant about basic social history, through all her layers of photoshop (she is not attractive, fat and looks like her tired husband) she looked like a decorated pet covered in the kid’s party section of a shop called Clintons. A sex slave, the original kind, they were originally singers and actresses so her choice was especially amusing, I saw people in person give those ads a second look like ew, nice try, what was she thinking. She was trying to look all sombre and respectable… when you can clearly see the fold where vulva meets thigh. One of those orange sellers you see in the TV shows, it’s an invitation to make an offer for their juicy bits… do they really think dressing like a whore, won’t make them look like a whore too? Yet she was standing there, still looking fat in a shopped corset, certainly not very Christian or modest as she stood in a cage skirt (I know) and sneering down her piggish nose at the camera like she could be Queen of anything other than the black girls who hate themselves for not getting surgery like her. Terrible role model. She keeps dying her hair blonde and getting it straightened, but she’ll never be white. Rihanna accepted this and I respect her for that. Rihanna actually has fun.

Don’t get me started on the Asians that get surgery to look white.
It never works. It’s like a misshapen mannequin because their bones lack our proportions. Why ruin yourself like that?
It’s uncanny valley and makes people trust you less because you literally wanna hide your face. We know what you’re supposed to look like, we are not stupid. It looks like a serial killer with a doll fetish butchered their face.

I just don’t see why they can prance around in a crown and nobody points out they look like a total prat.

If I wore an American head-dress or one of those Caribbean displays or an African wooden mask, I’d look less bad than these people, who are claiming to a bloodline that colonized them because that colonizer had wealth, it’s twisted and disturbing to watch them round the good shops. What are you doing here, this isn’t for you. Would they wear ermine Y/N. Bring back Elizabethan clothing laws, stat. They would’ve been kept in service, round the back, deemed too ugly for presentation. Yet they smother on the Playboy makeup to look worse. They’re signalling the fact they’d never in a million years be accepted into that society, it’s very, deeply weird.

A cane and monocle is about five or six social layers down from white head wear but ‘these’ baffingly pretentious people don’t even wear gloves, peasants used to wear gloves. One of the funniest things I’ve ever seen was Asians trying to do Ascot. You don’t look like a lady, you look like an escort. You can’t purchase Whiteness. The men looked better, possibly waiters or butlers.

Who do I blame? The wimpy fathers.

Rich daddy tells them they’re a Princess growing up… well, that has to bloody stop. We don’t tell our children they’re an Empress, do we? It’d be a bridge too far. They can’t even pull off a 20s hat or a schoolgirl headband without looking like a porn audition, there’s a jarring element to it. Foreign stuff always looks like a costume, you do not blend. Be happy being yourself FFS. Life’s too short.

Too many Asians are ‘Anglophiles’, a polite term to refer to grandiose personal branding we’re supposed to accept and encourage as complimentary (no), which is actually racist because it’s always very niche (by class and county) and acting like they can do it better than us (our culture, usually in our country) but they swan around like Prince Charles faking a dodgy accent and going on about Earl Grey. We don’t drink Earl Grey, it’s pigswill. Buy a better taste in tea, love.

Have you seen how much they spend on crockery? They don’t even heat up the pot. It isn’t cast iron like yours. It’s either enamel or porcelain. We get it at Argos, mate. It’s made in your country.

The tiara thing is very solidly European, and it’s based on ancient religious pagan rites, like weddings. They’re not to play with, it’s obnoxious like those Maori tattoos but moreso. You don’t go around with a sceptre and orb, do you? Those look less obscene. Essentially, they’re claiming colonial rule over us. They think we’re too dumb to notice.

I guess they don’t have much modern culture to signal themselves, so they have to wholesale steal ours. Make your own.

Remember that flower crown trend? Druids. They use specific druidic flowers too. There are precise rituals and uses you can look up and read about. They would feel awkward dancing around a maypole and doing many of the chase/rape games but they’ll wear the uniforms like a trend? Where do they get off?

Did anybody call them out, the little tarts at festivals doing a duckface and peace sign? noooooooo

Follow your own fucking rules.

Culture whores have none.

Colonization is purely cultural. Cut it out.

story time

The one time I almost went full SJW (never go full SJW) some lower-middle class Chinese cunt in tatty threads was hogging my space in a corner, right up in my face like she was ghetto and well hard, telling me about scones. Well, ordering, really. Like I was a child to scold about licking a knife at breakfast. Little did she know I outranked her*, but she found out later when she got the sack and blacklisted for being rude (this happens a lot in Britain, we don’t tell you, we just do it). Still to date one of the most shameful displays of arrogance I’ve ever seen, other people looked at me from across the room like do you want help and I serenely looked back like oh, I’ve got this, I’ve got this bitch. It’s like making tea with the milk first, you just don’t do it. I have tons of these stories, seriously. It’s really bad, they think because they’re foreign they have a pass on being obnoxious. I straightened up from sitting correctly (she told me off for that too), smoothed my dress (she told me to buy better dresses), gave her a pitying look, just scoffed at her and said “well, I’ve seen how the Queen does it” and tapped off in my tiny heels.

When Asians complain about ‘racism’ in the West, especially GB, they never account for their own rudeness. Worse than a pig. I’ve met nicer micropigs.

Previously, the cultures didn’t interact much and ambassadors already knew the rules. Try the food the way they tell you to, don’t signal the clothes, you can’t. Multiculturalism has been unleashed without any ground rules, and the everyday respect that used to exist has vanished as well. It goes both ways or it goes full stop. I wouldn’t need to mention this topic and I’d save a lot of hassle at benefits and galas talking to these credit card bitches if they possessed just a bit of worldly perspective and international respect. It’s all about respect.

*Know your place is about being polite because the powerful people are who you least suspect. She assumed because I was timid, I was weak and went in for the kill. I could’ve stabbed her with my stiletto. Instead I was ladylike and ignored her until she half-grabbed something off my lap. Asian women are rude cunts when the facade of fake femininity comes down. Look at the Uni students, they’re incredibly racist in their choice of friends. I can’t wait until their debt bubble bursts and Princess has to find a job in a shop where she belongs.

The possible link between clothing femininity and the risk of rape

http://akinokure.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/the-no-pants-subway-ride-in-broader.html

Brilliant, I wish I’d thought of it.

Absolutely brilliant.

It jibes with the hemline length/economic downturn theory (hedonism) and the Lipstick Index (comforts) and everything.

I would add that it’s a combination of male quality and low quantity.

e.g. 20s dress in response to new migrants (high occasional risk) and rowdy war veterans pissed off you stole their job during WW1.

e.g. late 40s, early 50s dress in response to rarity of males (low average risk) after WW2 and the whiteness of many towns and cities (within group quality). The men also made more of an effort to show the status of their bloodline and future/current household, to leverage in competition.

Why are Taharrush ‘games’ a problem?

You don’t see much of this in Saudi Arabia where it’s punished.

TLDR: slavery.

This comment;

These invaders came with this belief that the European women are sex obsessed sluts. They get there and find reality is quite different… and they are pissed off about it. They’ve been told their whole lives what sluts these women are. So when the women reject them they really are shocked. They think someone is just screwing with them.

And on top of that… they’re 70 IQ savages.

bad combination.

They don’t even get why they’re rejected. You see the same problem with many PUAs comparing their success scores with one another as if it is comparable. You wouldn’t compare the number of contacts in a phone between an extravert and introvert, would you?

Whites have the lowest outbreeding/race-mixing levels. TBF: We aren’t even fucking each other (sterile contraceptive sex doesn’t count).
One valid explanation of this outbreeding aversion (actually natural genophilia) is due to the recessive gene profile of Europeans (where the white women at) and greatest phenotypic diversity (as easily illustrated by all the colours we come in).

For the PC excuse of “it’s their culture”, yes it is their culture. Cult is also from the word culture and we don’t tolerate them.

Rape culture is their mating strategy. Including the goats.

That’s why they’re actually totally justified in calling most of these women racist, but we buy into their frame that freedom of association (and sexual choice/consent) are a bad thing. People are different. They are not like us. They don’t think or behave like us and never will. How many centuries did the Middle East have to put their house in order, before any foreign wars too? They rape their own women covered head to toe in black, a rapist doesn’t target women based on the amount of skin she shows (actually a myth) but an estimation of the resistance he’ll face (gait studies). It just so happens the two tend to correlate, but plenty of women have been raped wearing casual clothes, jeans or menswear (i.e. nothing feminine at all from the neck down), and going back in time, if they’ll rape women in petticoats and hoop skirts, it isn’t about the clothing, is it? Whatever a woman wears, she is a potential target. Clothing choice is not a valid behavioural concern on this subject. Back on task…
Centuries later… Are they still desert-dwelling bigots who murder the victim? Compare to Japan’s terrorist problem.

12573777_814072838715463_4869879486389353014_n

Oh wait – they don’t have one.

http://chersonandmolschky.com/2015/04/13/islamic-terrorism-japan/

The feminists brought this on themselves. They wanted men to leave them alone, only the nice ones complied.

12439157_492200574317265_4705975562238835920_n

If a grown adult wants to play with fire, let them get burnt. Don’t get murdered or your own family gang-raped because you wanted to play the Hero to someone who’d side with your attacker.

A hundred years ago, in 1916, white women were still being sold into ‘white slavery‘, which in the dictionary means sexual slavery, to Muslims. To quote from wikipedia (terrible habit, I know but it’s referenced);

This trade continued up until World War I. Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who served as the U.S. Ambassador in Constantinople from 1913 until 1916, alleges in his Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story that there were gangs trading white slaves during his term in Constantinople.[40]

Slave is actually taken from Slav, a people so white you couldn’t miss them in the dark.

Yes, it’s totally about race and white people are the victims. These EU invaders are trying to start a modern-day Slave Trade. 

If the Alt Right wanted to wind up the SJWs, all they’d need to do is an historical documentary, completely 100% true, about the history of White Slavery. Really harrowing reconstructions of beautiful white women being sold at market. Something like…