Science discovers freeze response in rape

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sexual-assault-may-trigger-involuntary-paralysis

Tonic immobility occurs in other animals, there’s plenty of biological evidence.
It’s taking years to sort out the newfangled ‘rape gang’ problem with the cheapest solution, a rope, because society (politicians) continue to labour under the delusion that the likes of Ted Bundy was just a serial killer and completely skirt that ‘serial rapist’ is a thing. Most rape is conducted by serial rapists. SJWs don’t mention this for political reasons and something something “stigma”. Like pathology can’t be a ‘bad’ thing.
Because why would predators be sexual predators, and derive pleasure from more than one form of domination and suffering?
That’s just crazy-talk.
Next you’ll say there’s some type of amygdala causing the shutdown!

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361923006000517

Don’t look in that door!
Definitely don’t go looking for forensic evidence when it comes to rapists and rape gangs, that’s for sure!

They don’t continue to offend with full malice and moreover, escalate – like a serial killer.

This doesn’t constitute reckless public endangerment for political correctness!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/f78ad097-77d7-4ec0-8014-54ace0fc4b11
“I’m a man and I was raped.”
He froze and it wasn’t his fault, it isn’t a choice.

Die Hard lied to you.

Around predators (including the “human” variety) your brain does strange things.
It evolved because surviving with trauma is still surviving, biologically. Evolution is cruel.
In light of all this, consent laws definitely need amendment.
France needs an age of consent, for one.

Horniness =/= consent, this isn’t Brave New World.
Yet children are taught this. By the state. So they can blame the victim for, say, walking with a man or socializing. Summon the church elders, the slattern deserved it for feeling LUST! According to him. Don’t ask the adult man to control himself, perish the thought!

Imagine trying to argue that the other way, like if a man gets a random erection, that’s consent? Nope, the body is weird. Being “turned on” only equals knocking boots in porn. IRL it’s a non sequitur.

Court rules he cannot be prosecuted for rape as she did not protest

The girl’s family says she was silent as she was ‘paralysed by fear’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4925422/French-court-rules-girl-11-consented-sex-man-28.html

Coming to a bar near you

or a public street….

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woman-gang-raped-three-men-13525513

Why are women so paranoid?

You should be too. I find it deeply ironic the guys complaining women should feel safe with strangers (no?) often want to open-carry a gun just in case despite being better equipped physically to defend themselves without one.

Riddle me that bullshit.

nb

This assumes they aren’t choked, as sober (no alcohol or other drugs) people often are prior to any other assault, sexual or otherwise.

However, if they’re held down by others in a gang, usually choking is dispensed with (as forensic evidence).

Why do serial predators do this?
It can knock you out, women can be lead to a rape or kill zone elsewhere or thrown in a car for slavery, looking drunk and at best from their end, it’ll weaken your body and decision-making from oxygen deprivation.
That’s how practiced they are.

The term predator is literal, they base their lives around these machinations specifically calculated to exploit your human weaknesses including politeness, conformity and friendliness. How many discussions of rape mention this fact?

If only that drunk man knew this, he might’ve been spared. We distrust nice people for this reason.

“We must learn and then teach our children that niceness does not equal goodness. Niceness is a decision, a strategy of social interaction; it is not a character trait. People seeking to control others almost always present the image of a nice person in the beginning.” – Gavin De Becker

The guys online who don’t get this don’t want laws that protect them, too. Because plenty of serial rapists (unPC spoiler alert) are men – and gay. Deep down, a lot of men already know this and it’s a big factor in homoaversion. Avoiding rape, they have every right to.

Personally I don’t believe it’s fair on other prisoners to put rapists with the rest of the population.

Triggered degenerate Boomers

Not to be confused with salt of the earth Boomers I hardly ever need to discuss, who aren’t hypocrites and expected their kids to listen when they gave sound health advice.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/11/young-people-drunk-acohol-millenials

Normally when you see this line.

What’s wrong with young people today?

The next sentence better be fucking good.

The Groaniad today continues:

They don’t get drunk any more

WTF.
It’s a new low in moral decay that the elders are trying desperately to corrupt their children.
Alcohol is ridiculous (social media rep), expensive, a stupid (not glamorous) legal dark grey area and an addictive distraction from the important business of networking (which we wouldn’t have to do if you didn’t import competition and switch to offshore training).
We’re told to “protect ourselves”, cannot own a gun or knife or spray in public and given the most common date rape drug is alcohol, why bother?

[see end for that topic]

Nobody wants to be blamed for their own rape or other abuse, especially in this multicultural Hell of rape gangs expressly targeting the white (what hate crime?) and drunk (predators love legal nitpicking). Clubs are losing popularity because women hate hunting grounds. Clubs exist for men and the lowest kind. Pubs more popular than ever, for comparison. Low odds of rape, groping, grinding and (especially Third World) harassment there. Naturally, the club creeps use alcohol as their excuse too. Scientifically false, drunk people can behave impeccably, as you’ll notice the second the police turn up. Other sedatives are not a free pass on assault either.

https://psmag.com/social-justice/placebo-week-getting-drunk-beer-alcohol-expectations-92254

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2634499.stm
“We have made people’s memory worse by telling them that they were intoxicated even though they had nothing stronger than plain flat tonic water with limes,” said co-researcher Maryanne Garry.
So an intake of so-called moderate alcohol wouldn’t be wise either, before someone chimes in.

Think of it as a precautionary legal defense from rapists who take advantage of slow law changes (no major interventions since Queen Victoria’s reign, and on gin) and the crawling consideration of the latest neuroscience. Sugar isn’t cocaine and alcohol doesn’t turn a law-abiding citizen into a rabid rapist, men are not naturally rapists. Nor does it bring that out as an animal instinct, society conditions excuses. You can’t take from a bank drunk and say Muh It Doesn’t Count as robbery, neither can you “take” a human being in rape and victim-blame for the “hate crime” of being white and attractive (note: imagine the pedophiles and other dedicated rapists in response* to that). This is why we need studies, psychology is not common sense. They don’t dare mention where alcohol is consumed (privately, at home) and why (visibly valid concerns about public safety relating to the new low trust society).

It isn’t about women trusting strange men (and why the hell should they? when has that ever been intelligent historically?? and do they trust their fellow random men either?*) it’s that throughout society, there is no trust. Again, why should there be? Burden of Proof. So much rape and abuse isn’t recorded or reported due to political fears of revenge that there are active reasons to distrust, fuck your snowflake feelings on the subject. Why do these broflakes feel entitled to trust they didn’t earn? Normal people (i.e. not manwhores) have lower openness scores. It’s like the funniest red handed moment “how dare you notice I only want one thing and am willing to take it unwillingly, I wanted to rape you if I could get away with it but you hurt my narc feelings, I demand satisfaction”.

Unless you’d prefer women be armed? That would be better.

Predators believe only they are real – their urges, rights etc.
The prey isn’t allowed to plan, complain or have equal HUMAN rights.

*Rapists are as real and sneaky as serial killers, simply different types of predator.

**I bet they don’t let male salesmen into their house, the paranoid sexist pigs. Straight men in gay bars don’t dare get drunk, I rest my case.

Etiquette needs to return, no talking to strangers is basic.

Teen films are fiction, there’s a crime about every five minutes, it’s normalized. Forcing someone to consume alcohol, by coercion or “slipping” covertly, aside from being illegal (directly responsible) if they have any medical issues from it you didn’t know, is poisoning. Then there are the various chemicals in alcohol that are well-known as rape drugs specifically e.g. GHB in wine. Then there’s finally on this point how women are weakened more by alcohol than men so any arguments to “she was with it” ring false from simple sex differences and accurate biology (no woman can handle alcohol, none, it’s a Hollywood myth based on the 30s vamp who’d take one single shot of a hard liquor and stop there).

Why don’t the would-be (totally not definitely never) rapists want people to defend themselves in their company by remaining of lucid consciousness? If they’re so concerned with “false” allegations? Makes you think.

Surely you’d want all women in the club not drinking so when they consent to you, it’s legally kosher. Unless of course, you’re “taking advantage”, and want them insensible, the politest term for rape we have.

And if you only sleep with brain-impaired strangers, don’t you expect allegations?
Why can’t you get your “fun” from sober people?

They try to blame the victim a sneakier way (planning legal defense months before the act itself isn’t odd?) by asking a false dichotomy and presenting a cliche anecdote that acts like the sexes are biologically the same, namely, what if they’re both drunk? The one who physically initiates is the rapist, obviously. Actus reus, look it up, idiots.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/actus_reus

They think they’ve got an AHA! moment on the “both drunk” condition but it’s the simpleton logic of pointing to a car pileup after an accident and claiming all of the cars in question caused it. Non sequitur much?

And define drunk? Given sex differences, you’re still stupid.

Back to booze

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-01-alcohol-dna-cancer.html
Alcohol causes permanent DNA damage and while older people may not care, we’re clued-up enough on science to care an awful lot. It may even pass down the germline (epigenetics).
https://newatlas.com/alcohol-cancer-dna-damage-stem-cell/52813/
Why?
Well, since we’ll be working our entire lives (retirement is a temporary fad) then staying working fit is imperative.
comment
“It concerns me how much people over a certain age brag about their alcohol intake like they don’t have a problem.”
Yes, agree, let’s all aspire to be like the alcoholic divorcees!
Definitely not addictive, is it? They can give up any time they like.
They wanted clean living kids, they got them. If they’re so triggered by the fact their children are literally better than them, their narcissism is not our problem.
Opposing the degeneracy when we see the Bacchanalian wages of it, how absolutely awful of us.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/09/28/millennials-oppose-carousing/

You’re not James Bond, we can now get those martini ingredients in the average Tesco…. Express.
We don’t want to be a burden on the State if we can possibly help it (we know about elder abuse) and neither should they?

https://drugfree.org/learn/drug-and-alcohol-news/alcohol-most-common-date-rape-drug-law-enforcement-officials-say/
https://efficientgov.com/blog/2018/04/04/what-is-the-most-common-date-rape-drug/
https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2014/sep/22/alcohol-date-rape-drug-facilitated-sexual-assault-dfsa
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071020113144.htm

It does count, and anyone who says otherwise is a willing mark in a game of Spot the Rapist. It’s a chemical that impairs the brain from threat recognition and literally weakens the physical ability to resist (fend off). It’s also most common in male rape, regardless of victim age. The law requires adjustments.

Video: Who owns your body? [DNA]

I’m not saying where you should look.

I’m not saying where you should pause this video to read carefully.

I’m not saying you shouldn’t become a guinea pig to any test, just know what the test really is about.
Taking whatever is unique about you, and buying it.

Plus, the other thing.

https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article/dna-evidence-can-be-fabricated-scientists-showhttps://www.forensicmag.com/news/2015/02/dna-evidence-can-be-faked

“DNA is only as good as the records you keep.”

Manchild told No

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/09/01/this-is-crazy-sobs-utah-hospital-nurse-as-cop-roughs-her-up-arrests-her-for-doing-her-job/

By all accounts, the head nurse at the University of Utah Hospital’s burn unit was professional and restrained when she told a Salt Lake City police detective he wasn’t allowed to draw blood from a badly injured patient.

that’s DNA btw

The detective didn’t have a warrant, first off. And the patient wasn’t conscious, so he couldn’t give consent. Without that, the detective was barred from collecting blood samples — not just by hospital policy, but by basic constitutional law.

if you want rights, we need to stop the people who feel entitled to ride roughshod over them

Still, Detective Jeff Payne insisted that he be let in to take the blood, saying the nurse would be arrested and charged if she refused.

Nurse Alex Wubbels politely stood her ground. She got her supervisor on the phone so Payne could hear the decision loud and clear. “Sir,” said the supervisor, “you’re making a huge mistake because you’re threatening a nurse.”

Payne snapped. He seized hold of the nurse, shoved her out of the building and cuffed her hands behind her back. A bewildered Wubbels screamed “help me” and “you’re assaulting me” as the detective forced her into an unmarked car and accused her of interfering with an investigation.

On Friday, Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill said he wanted a criminal investigation into the incident. Salt Lake Mayor Jackie Biskupski and Police Chief Mike Brown apologized to the nurse in a statement. “I extend a personal apology to Ms. Wubbels for what she has been through for simply doing her job,” the mayor said.

entitlement, thy outcomes are ugly

bring back flogging for those who make public offices look bad

flog them through the street

Consent is equally vital for men and it isn’t purely sexual.

Stealthing obviously is a form of rape

Why don’t the sexes trust each other?

They shouldn’t, don’t trust any stranger.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/stealthing-man-take-off-condom-sex-no-consent-rape-sexual-assault-a7740611.html

Why do you think the internet is right?

Have you not bothered to look up the laws in your area?

Consent is very precise contractual law.

If she consents with a condom, and you remove the condom and proceed – that’s clearly rape.

Read the CPS guidelines (UK), it’s clearly non-consensual or they wouldn’t be trying to hide it.
That fact alone shows what they’re really up to.
You change something, you ask. And if they say no, you don’t do it.
That’s the verbal part in verbal consent.

There’s no maybe or if about this. And that’s a sign the law works because it protects people from unexpected sexual contact (non-consensual).

Giving something a kitsch little name doesn’t make it less creepy, it makes it moreso.

Notice they seem to want to spread their own STDs?

Why are so many young men retarded enough to consciously assume every woman is on the Pill at all times? [porn]

And that it works? [porn]

And ‘no trace’? It’s right up there with the PUA BS about ‘alpha STD protection’.

I’ve met more sexually literate children who’d balk at that.

Old joke: what do you call a man who uses the pull out method?

A father.

They don’t really enjoy the ‘way it feels’ or they’d get one of those innovative Fleshlights with all the weird and wonderful shapes.

They’re r-types, they enjoy the deceit.
They enjoy the rape.
Whether it’s at a conscious level or not, it’s a known r-selected breeding habit.

On a related note:

Men can’t even trust random women.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/sexual-assault-train-bus-public-transport-what-to-do-british-transport-police-a7718426.html

70 per cent of the offences reported to the British Transport Police are sexual assaults on women, 20 per cent are ‘outraging public decency’ (masturbation), six per cent exposure and two per cent sexual assault on men.

Sick bitches. Lock them up.

What happens to the body after too much sex?

http://www.ranker.com/list/what-happens-to-your-body-when-you-have-too-much-sex/jacob-shelton

Nobody wants to tell Americans they rank #1 among yearly new STD infections in the First World.
Nobody wants to point out that if you were any good at it, it wouldn’t take so many tries to be satisfied, and being difficult to satisfy is a personal fault, not the partner’s.
On top of this, the health problems are reflected not only in the microbiome and psychiatric damage but also glandular issues, including what’s been called adrenal fatigue. The body should not be exhausted.

There’s another thing I’ve seen no one mention.

In any economic collapse or stressful apocalypse scenarios, the HPV in America alone will flare up right around the time of mass rape, including men-on-men (heterosexuality is a feature of good economic times, desperate people want a buzz if the world is ending and men are more desperate/violent than women). The stressed body is more prone to being infected. HIV is easier to catch with any other STD, and syphilis affects men far more than women. It also causes massive sores, biological madness and parts of your body to rot off including the nose to cave in, so others in any time of economic hardship will avoid you socially like a leper – but worse. Hepatitis is hard to diagnose and treat at the best of times, and an easy killer, especially when the body is malnourished and weak from stress.

I think there is a God because the wages of sin really rack up if you look at the way the world is going.
Chastity and moderation produce the ideal balance of health benefits, but don’t let that stop you.

I’ve also been looking into a piece of brain tissue called the insula and believe it might contain the secret to the differences of degeneracy between r-types and K-types, it rewards lust, assesses arousal and mates, including disgust, and allows the brain to signal it and prefer purity.
Arguably, sexual degenerates (is there any other kind) have a brain-damage specific to their insula.
Nobody’s going to fund that study.
Damage can include funky signalling, it doesn’t need to be a functional equivalent of a watermelon.

If you made your health a priority, you wouldn’t need to sleep around.
You’d feel good naturally. That’s a prime motivator in young people, because sex is seen as cheap/easy/free.
If you made your health a priority, you wouldn’t want to damage it with the risk of oral herpes from random kissing alone. You can technically get HIV from kissing, especially if you’re prone to mouth ulcers. Say, from apocalyptic stress.
Should healthcare really cover the people who demonstrate the self-control of a child?
When did society agree to that in the social contract? Show me the receipts.
Remember, legal consent is technically based on brain maturity. If a finding were to come out about impaired decision-making with biological proof, treatment and testing available, the law could get very interesting.

So too does the candy dispenser of antibiotics to degenerates play the key role in the spread of resistance. MRSA rose with the hook-up culture. Is society right to put children and the elderly at risk, for a lifestyle they didn’t choose?
The social harm is spread out to society, it is antisocial to begin with.
Contrary to popular belief online, ED is a cardiovascular condition, and probably God’s way of saying Don’t chase girls young enough to be your daughter, stop fucking or she’ll give you a heart attack!

Sexual imprinting is very real and likely a major factor in r/K, it might’ve been what Freud was swinging at with the Oedipal Complex. To pair sexual satisfaction with the social experience of people who are rude, mean, cruel, that you don’t care about and never love… must have some kind of sociopathic effect on the brain. It’s behaviourism, you’re training it and the circuits cease to be plastic in the mid-20s, when most people are still fucking around. Again, studies are few and far between but it’ll come out eventually.
Physical intimacy makes emotional intimacy issues worse. That’s known.
It can increase risk of suicide, via depression, a link which hasn’t been studied in the greater prevalence of suicidal men. For PC reasons. Better to let them die than insult them, right? Sex is a natural painkiller, and painkillers work on psychic pain too – including, ironically, loneliness.
SSRIs should be prescribed for many so-called players. Nobody chooses to sleep around because they like themselves. They’d soon perk up and learn normal emotional reactions to those behaviours. The brain when weakened by other addictions like porn that can cause a medical phenomena called hypofrontality (one symptom: weak impulse control and pleasure-seeking) and in effect, this causes you to do stupid things. Things a recovered person would be ashamed of.
Even if you had an addiction to pleasure chemicals, it’d be more effective and better for your reputation to take up a drug habit considering the risks of sleeping around – including the fact at least over half of cancers are pathogenic in aetiology. Sleeping around increases the risk of penile and anal cancers in men… no, they don’t need to do butt stuff for the latter (although anal bacteria from women can be enough) and wearing a condom isn’t responsible enough (HPV). There’s no excuse for sex addiction because it’s a behaviour, at best they’re ‘addicted’ to orgasms, a self-soothing mechanism which can be found in children, especially pre-pubertal boys (you can look it up but your browser history will look… strange). Really, that tension is psychiatric with physiological effects, it is mistaken for sexual tension (arousal) because society programs us and men in particular to hide negative emotions and turn them into positive ones. You could think of it as the male form of hysteria. It is nervous tension throughout the body, they are trying to dispel it, which actually encourages more thanks to stress hormones (cortisol, adrenaline, prolactin, other things that make you fat…) and you know the cliched definition of insanity… How was hysteria ‘treated’? Masturbation.
So once more, there’s no excuse for sleeping around.

There isn’t really much to brag about. There are a number of reasons the ancients looked upon lecherous men with pity and disdain. This is without going into the Peter Pan Syndrome youth problems, prevalent in Gen X ‘guys’ who don’t even want to be addressed as men or Mr.Name but complain about tranny pronouns. Broflakes and their mantrums.

Yeah, that’s hormonal too. Any time you question someone with a behavioural compulsion, especially one reinforced by chemical feedback in the body, an-almost narcissistic rage ensues. If they have NPD or BPD traits, this is rage of Lilith proportions.

About the prolactin, for example. Both sexes excrete it.

You ever notice how many male orgasm fiends have bitch tits?

http://www.nature.com/ijir/journal/v14/n2/full/3900823a.html