What happens to the body after too much sex?

http://www.ranker.com/list/what-happens-to-your-body-when-you-have-too-much-sex/jacob-shelton

Nobody wants to tell Americans they rank #1 among yearly new STD infections in the First World.
Nobody wants to point out that if you were any good at it, it wouldn’t take so many tries to be satisfied, and being difficult to satisfy is a personal fault, not the partner’s.
On top of this, the health problems are reflected not only in the microbiome and psychiatric damage but also glandular issues, including what’s been called adrenal fatigue. The body should not be exhausted.

There’s another thing I’ve seen no one mention.

In any economic collapse or stressful apocalypse scenarios, the HPV in America alone will flare up right around the time of mass rape, including men-on-men (heterosexuality is a feature of good economic times, desperate people want a buzz if the world is ending and men are more desperate/violent than women). The stressed body is more prone to being infected. HIV is easier to catch with any other STD, and syphilis affects men far more than women. It also causes massive sores, biological madness and parts of your body to rot off including the nose to cave in, so others in any time of economic hardship will avoid you socially like a leper – but worse. Hepatitis is hard to diagnose and treat at the best of times, and an easy killer, especially when the body is malnourished and weak from stress.

I think there is a God because the wages of sin really rack up if you look at the way the world is going.
Chastity and moderation produce the ideal balance of health benefits, but don’t let that stop you.

I’ve also been looking into a piece of brain tissue called the insula and believe it might contain the secret to the differences of degeneracy between r-types and K-types, it rewards lust, assesses arousal and mates, including disgust, and allows the brain to signal it and prefer purity.
Arguably, sexual degenerates (is there any other kind) have a brain-damage specific to their insula.
Nobody’s going to fund that study.
Damage can include funky signalling, it doesn’t need to be a functional equivalent of a watermelon.

If you made your health a priority, you wouldn’t need to sleep around.
You’d feel good naturally. That’s a prime motivator in young people, because sex is seen as cheap/easy/free.
If you made your health a priority, you wouldn’t want to damage it with the risk of oral herpes from random kissing alone. You can technically get HIV from kissing, especially if you’re prone to mouth ulcers. Say, from apocalyptic stress.
Should healthcare really cover the people who demonstrate the self-control of a child?
When did society agree to that in the social contract? Show me the receipts.
Remember, legal consent is technically based on brain maturity. If a finding were to come out about impaired decision-making with biological proof, treatment and testing available, the law could get very interesting.

So too does the candy dispenser of antibiotics to degenerates play the key role in the spread of resistance. MRSA rose with the hook-up culture. Is society right to put children and the elderly at risk, for a lifestyle they didn’t choose?
The social harm is spread out to society, it is antisocial to begin with.
Contrary to popular belief online, ED is a cardiovascular condition, and probably God’s way of saying Don’t chase girls young enough to be your daughter, stop fucking or she’ll give you a heart attack!

Sexual imprinting is very real and likely a major factor in r/K, it might’ve been what Freud was swinging at with the Oedipal Complex. To pair sexual satisfaction with the social experience of people who are rude, mean, cruel, that you don’t care about and never love… must have some kind of sociopathic effect on the brain. It’s behaviourism, you’re training it and the circuits cease to be plastic in the mid-20s, when most people are still fucking around. Again, studies are few and far between but it’ll come out eventually.
Physical intimacy makes emotional intimacy issues worse. That’s known.
It can increase risk of suicide, via depression, a link which hasn’t been studied in the greater prevalence of suicidal men. For PC reasons. Better to let them die than insult them, right? Sex is a natural painkiller, and painkillers work on psychic pain too – including, ironically, loneliness.
SSRIs should be prescribed for many so-called players. Nobody chooses to sleep around because they like themselves. They’d soon perk up and learn normal emotional reactions to those behaviours. The brain when weakened by other addictions like porn that can cause a medical phenomena called hypofrontality (one symptom: weak impulse control and pleasure-seeking) and in effect, this causes you to do stupid things. Things a recovered person would be ashamed of.
Even if you had an addiction to pleasure chemicals, it’d be more effective and better for your reputation to take up a drug habit considering the risks of sleeping around – including the fact at least over half of cancers are pathogenic in aetiology. Sleeping around increases the risk of penile and anal cancers in men… no, they don’t need to do butt stuff for the latter (although anal bacteria from women can be enough) and wearing a condom isn’t responsible enough (HPV). There’s no excuse for sex addiction because it’s a behaviour, at best they’re ‘addicted’ to orgasms, a self-soothing mechanism which can be found in children, especially pre-pubertal boys (you can look it up but your browser history will look… strange). Really, that tension is psychiatric with physiological effects, it is mistaken for sexual tension (arousal) because society programs us and men in particular to hide negative emotions and turn them into positive ones. You could think of it as the male form of hysteria. It is nervous tension throughout the body, they are trying to dispel it, which actually encourages more thanks to stress hormones (cortisol, adrenaline, prolactin, other things that make you fat…) and you know the cliched definition of insanity… How was hysteria ‘treated’? Masturbation.
So once more, there’s no excuse for sleeping around.

There isn’t really much to brag about. There are a number of reasons the ancients looked upon lecherous men with pity and disdain. This is without going into the Peter Pan Syndrome youth problems, prevalent in Gen X ‘guys’ who don’t even want to be addressed as men or Mr.Name but complain about tranny pronouns. Broflakes and their mantrums.

Yeah, that’s hormonal too. Any time you question someone with a behavioural compulsion, especially one reinforced by chemical feedback in the body, an-almost narcissistic rage ensues. If they have NPD or BPD traits, this is rage of Lilith proportions.

About the prolactin, for example. Both sexes excrete it.

You ever notice how many male orgasm fiends have bitch tits?

http://www.nature.com/ijir/journal/v14/n2/full/3900823a.html

the r in Refugees Welcome signs + funnies

Look at the facial expression in the Bible quote. That’s an atheist going to Hell for blasphemy.

Spliced with photo of actual ‘refugees’. A picture is worth a thousand words.

Hopefully the Manchester attack, nail-bombing little girls has redpilled these feminists.
Somehow I doubt it. This is the one that started it all.

This one in particular triggers me, the way to kill it is with apathy: So?

So was Jack the Ripper, so was Hitler, so is Trump. Tired of whataboutism.

“they are us, we are them”

true

Meanwhile, actual refugees

Yeah, let’s not save these people waving round the white flag of Christendom.

Are they welcome in YOUR home? Why not?

JK Rowling has yet to take in any ‘refugees’ that someone offered to pay to fly to her homes!

She is irrelevant. Like…

Emma Watson hasn’t spent a night in the Calais camp alone, without security.

Locks are racist! No borders? No walls! Let’s all live in pagodas! 

Now a series of triggering memes and funnies.

It’s been a while. 120 funnies. Some repeats. A few serious.

about as real as her hair

Going by her Coco the Clown makeup, I think they do.

The People do not consent to open borders. The native people.

Everyone into Lord of the Rings.

All harassment is bad but sexual harassment is the worst.
It’s the First World, fucking act like it.
Recently, a German woman was beaten by a ‘migrant’, because she told him not to call her a bitch.

Tesla’s expression, my fucking sides.

He never said that but yes. Fitness is in adaptation.

Just like consciousness. You can’t touch it or test it. It’s unfalsifiable. It’s the scientific concept of spirit.
It isn’t scientific though.

Sexual orientation theory is BS. There’s only behaviour – which hole is your goal?

SJW’s playbook.

The alt-lite treats the J-word as their N.

And strange brown men on the street.

The temporary alliance of SJWs and Muslims is simple: the sexually entitled support the sexually entitled.
Also take down White Man but obviously, SJWs aren’t white or men, typically.

Video: Muslim in Canada defends pedophilia

http://www.facebook.com/AnsweringChristHaters/videos/1210222092433197/

They’re getting so bold, aren’t they?

I think the only sensible reply to this is Deus Vult.

“Silence is consent.”

The feminists say nothing.

This completely contradicts the notion of consent, which is a positive construct that must be actively given, in all law, so I would question the translation of that word. It must mean something else, Islam knows no such thing as consent. There is only its meaning, ‘submission’. Submission is never consensual, it is coerced. Coercion is like blackmail in another signed (non-marital) contract, it vitiates consent, it becomes invalid. One must be free to consent.

Lying about the conjoined medical phenomena of menstruation and puberty is another strike against reason.

This entire sham of a religion is merely an excuse for war. No other religion is warmongering. It is totally incompatible with the West and its culture and people.

What is sexual coercion? (hint: not consensual)

It’s a positive sign when the sluts and manwhores kvetch over this information getting out.

It’s a great way of outing rapists, like the vegan test. Just discuss rape by fraud and out pop the rapists.

Oddly they’ll talk about male rape as a red herring, when men are probably coerced as much as women based on porn myths i.e. men always want it.

These are your rights. Your right to personal sovereignty, physical power over your own body. They don’t want potential victims to know their rights.

Like, there’s nothing wrong with being a consumer, but purchasing stolen goods is still illegal. Fraud is always possible.

http://www.consented.ca/consent/coercion/
“It’s not that they did not say “no,” but that they could not say “no.””
People will happily admit duress is wrong, but make it something physical, than written… suddenly they argue it’s ‘complicated’ – no.

http://www.loveisrespect.org/content/what-sexual-coercion/

Or you could stop blaming the victim and simply bring back seduction law, which prevented some of the lesser-known forms of rape. (Because consent needs to be fully, truthfully informed).

Seduction is a form of abusive manipulation. It’s sick that society uses the term to mean something admirable.

Seduction is illegal under English common law. Simply enforce it.
Most of the American system is based on it too. Sinatra was charged with it.

Consent is religious, not individual

reposting a thing I explained elsewhere

smug

sexual consent does have a standard – the marriage signature, so the feminist permission slip is trying to replace the marital one
and arguably that’s why premarital sex is rape, or at least not actually sex – because there’s no such thing as consensus morality, people think they can make up their own rules
two people can agree to kill and cannibalize one of them, it’s consensual by modern legal standard but it isn’t moral in the spiritual sense
but consent isn’t verbal, it’s always been witnessed like the marriage contract, by the church
so consent to fornication is a nonsense
because consent is granted legitimacy by god via the church ceremony, specifically
you don’t have permission to give away your body, except in marriage

“You do not belong to yourself.” 1 Cor 6:19

consent without religious jurisdiction is given in bad faith, they promise to take one another without taking responsibility, rendering it legally null and void aka rape

another reason church and state cannot be separated
it’s a myth
such a place does not exist
every state has an official religion
atheists want to live in a Christian state surrounded by Christian people
the state’s law depends on the moral absolutes (good, evil, guilty, innocent) of religion

what’s the use of swearing to tell the truth in court, in an atheist state?
a vow of what? an oath to what?

5 types of sexual coercion

A lot of men don’t realize that rapists often get a Yes on something else (foot in the door technique) then act like it means something else after the fact.

Just look at prison rape. You accept a free muffin at lunch, you’re later told you agreed to be their bed buddy.
That’s a male example of sexual coercion and men are rightfully terrified of it.

Coercion vitiates consent. It’s in the law, on the legal books.

https://www.bustle.com/articles/67926-is-it-rape-if-you-say-yes-5-types-of-sexual-coercion-explained

“You’re my wife/girlfriend, you are supposed to be having sex with me.”

A girlfriend owes you nothing.
A wife owes you something, but not constantly like a servant.

Many cultures teach us that sex is an inherent part of marriage. Many people take that a step further, and believe that being in a romantic relationship with someone makes you entitled to have sex with them.

They don’t believe that. Believing something doesn’t make it so. They’re lying to blackmail that person.

“You owe me” isn’t a belief.

The problem with that skewed thinking is that it leads some people to act as if taking on the label of “wife,” “girlfriend,” or “partner” suddenly makes your body their property.

I guess this relates to the idea of owning one another, which is true in a spiritual sense with spouses but doesn’t extend to constant entitlement, it relates to the idea that men always have to be up for it like robots and projects it onto the woman as her fault if he isn’t.

Unless you’re Catholic and never use contraception, it has nothing to do with Go forth and multiply, and has nothing to do with Christian duty. Prior to any duty, you should know what you’re agreeing to.

“If you don’t have sex with me, I’m breaking up with you.”

“If you don’t sleep with me, I’m going to sleep with someone else.”

“If you don’t sleep with me, I’m going to tell everyone you are a prude.”

In those cases it’s more obvious that nobody should be sleeping with them because they’re immature.

If Mommy won’t let me have the toy, I’m gonna smash it.

Attractive.

If they don’t respect your No, they don’t respect you or your body. Leave immediately. Run, don’t walk.

Logically, they shouldn’t respect a Yes either, if they doubt your ability to consent. Think about it.

What’s the subtextual thought process here?

You’re not allowed to say No to me.

ding ding crazy

run

whatsjwsimagine

Blackmail doesn’t apply to any agreement, including written contracts.

“If you really loved me, you would have sex with me.”

That isn’t love, that’s prostitution. A prostitute pays for things with sex.

“I wouldn’t have taken you out to dinner if I knew you were just leading me on. If you didn’t want to sleep with me, you shouldn’t have been flirting with me either.”

Again, (tends to be) male entitlement. Neither sex is owed sex.
That’s a non sequitur. If they didn’t want a date, they shouldn’t have asked for a date. That’s the real logic.

Don’t then complain that you thought (lie) it meant ‘something else’, like a ONS assuming it’s now a relationship. But that’s female entitlement, so they’d probably agree if the example isn’t close to home.

It is very easy for someone to try to ply you with alcohol as foreplay to a sexual encounter — because they know that if they can “relax” you enough, you may drop your resistance due to your impaired judgment, and agree to have sex. If your partner knows that you don’t want to have sex, and you find them repeatedly topping off your glass

that would be the point to tell them to go fuck themselves

If you find yourself saying yes to sex as a means to avoid harm, then there is no excuse for your partner’s behavior; please consider talking to someone and getting help.

The police, because sex is not a form of appeasement.

No seriously, many date rapists use these tactics because it gives them more plausible deniability in court later.
I once heard of a serial rapist who’d lure women to alleys threatening to hurt them while a friend played lookout then he forced them to say they wanted him before raping them. Eventually he got caught. Eventually.

The ‘game’ of getting the woman to agree is part of the sexual thrill, because they can take that choice away from her too.

A No doesn’t change into a Yes. That’s called nagging. The coercion thing isn’t widely known although rape by fraud is old as the hills, so the rapist also assumes they’re covered as long as she says the ‘Magic Word’ (until they’re in front of a judge).

There isn’t a magic word that makes rape OK. That’s kinda the point of rape, taking, as in taking away.

Date rapists are harder to catch because the women involved believe it was their fault and he isn’t like that with others (he is). So yes, report it. Others might not get away and you can do everything right and still get raped if they drug you (that’s why date rape is yes, actually, very real, and anyone who tries to argue otherwise is flagging as one of them).

Rapists fear healthy personal boundaries.

Update: I’ll throw this here.

http://www.cracked.com/blog/how-men-are-trained-to-think-sexual-assault-no-big-deal/

Stalking isn’t romantic.
Harassment isn’t brave.
People don’t owe other people anything.
There are no excuses for shitty behaviour.

I cba to go into this one.

Short version – women are not men and don’t have male libido, even porn stars aren’t really into it/you.

It’s stupid to assume all women are coy like some 19th century Austen novel and further, coyness is lying. Coy women don’t sleep with you. It is exclusive from sluttiness. Sluttiness is anti-coy. But I guess that wouldn’t make porn as fun to watch.

There’s no such thing as playing hard to get. You’re either hard to get or easy.

Imagine if we flipped it and said everything men do, they do for female attention and approval. Good career? Wants to attract a good woman. Nice car? He can’t appreciate cars for themselves, it must be to get women. Nice body? He doesn’t care for his health, it’s all about us. It’s incredibly narcissistic and spoiled to assume the choices of others have ANYTHING to do with you.

It’s also sexist to assume that clothing choices based on temperature e.g. male shirtlessness, female mini-skirts, or other practicality, have anything to do with their moral character.

Adult men have no excuse to think as stupidly as teenage boys.
They want an excuse for their actions, they want someone else to blame.

comment

I don’t have anything much to add to this except to say that I do really appreciate the article. It is frustrating to deal with guys who simply refuse to accept ‘no’ as an answer, because there is no way to ‘really’ refuse once ‘no’ is off the table. Short of fleeing the scene, what the f**k can you say?

That’s the point. It’s a trap.
They think if they can rationalize it, it isn’t rape and you’re the ‘crazy’ one.

Ahh, gaslighting again. Notice how this often crops up with the shit of the species? Because obviously, it can never be sociopath/borderline/plain jerk’s fault. You know, the consequences of his actions. Like a man. You push him away, kick him, bite, scream or punch him? You’re a crazy bitch! But him initiating physical action goes unmentioned. It ‘doesn’t count’ as assault, in his mind, because his consent to your body over-rides your human rights. They never mention what they did just before and claim not to see anything wrong – but they don’t mention it unless forced. This is why they rarely harass women in the company of other men – they know it’s wrong and fear punishment for the crime. This is why they usually stop hassling a girl if she says ‘I have a boyfriend’ (women have to lie to be left alone, minding their own business alone, in public. In the West). They’re cowards trying to exert control over others, women are simply the sex less physically equipped to defend ourselves.

They think No means Yes and Get Lost means Take Me I’m Yours – a Disney cartoon figured this out.

They don’t really think that, they’re pushing their luck and the boundaries of the law.

No means No because that’s literally the line. That’s the legal line we shouldn’t have to reach when there are other forms of rejection men are willfully blind to. It’s been proven men assume sexual interest where there is none. It’s a defect in their programming. However, ignoring many indicators to the contrary (emotional intelligence) isn’t an excuse. Women are people, first and foremost, and respect should be given when asking anyone for anything, since you are in the position of desire and need them to oblige you.

The whole tone of that article is a theme I call Poor Men, via Women.

Wtf.

How enlightened, feminist guy.

You’ve gone from acting like a black guy (where all this ‘sexual culture’ comes from) to just a plain misogynist, who can’t understand that women aren’t billboards for male attention. via People is terribly dehumanizing as a message.

It isn’t about you.
It isn’t about you.
It isn’t about you.

Assumptions make a what?

The feminists do the opposite, like Emma Watson signalling Poor Women, via Men. Still wrong, still sexism. You don’t self-actualize or seek attention/sympathy via the opposite sex. Or any other people, really. Your business is yours, not every stranger who piques your fancy.

OT

We seem to have a form of sexual politics like consensus reality. There’s no such thing as consensus morality. Let’s assume coercion doesn’t apply for a moment. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Two people can agree to something, doesn’t make it less wrong. Evil can be mutually agreed. So no, getting a Yes doesn’t get you off the hook for what you choose to do with your own body.

Update: Rape gangs are illegal because it’s organised sexual coercion of women (not just minors).  It’s organised crime, it just happens to be rape than common theft.

Which brings me onto a valid point.

Playing the Eve Teasing line “it’s her fault for being too attractive”, I don’t get to rob a bank and go “but, your Honour, it’s their fault for having too much money!”
You’re responsible for your own impulse control, you monsters. Impulse control is heavily tied to IQ, Westerners have no excuse. Rapists are the sexual Marxists of the world, willing to steal what they can’t earn. You are not allowed to reject a Marxist’s claim to your income, the fruit of your body.
Do regular white women have to be like children in Sweden and wear wristbands saying “please don’t rape me”? You’d ignore those too. Almost like you don’t consider the target group as people, like the rape gangs.
Erotic capital is not a choice, men have it too, expression of sensuality is cultural, social, not necessarily sexual (the culture says we need to look somewhat sexy to conform! and too many things are labelled sexy when they aren’t) and what one person does e.g. tight clothing, is not a super-secret, erotomanic code for burning desire to random observer. It isn’t about you. If a woman wants a man, in this culture, she can ask him out. He doesn’t need to “chase” her, he isn’t a lion about to eat a gazelle. To compare their fun to murder really shows their character, dunnit?