Roe v Wade misunderstandings

  1. It’s always been a state matter. While good, this isn’t much without actions to tighten up the loopholes to let this happen again,

Or the Left will try to open this up again. I’ve spoken to them enough to know the following will destroy this topic and bury it forever.

  1. Set age of consent at 18 across America, no exceptions. It’s an oversight to protect pedo politicians. You don’t need cannon fodder for banker wars anymore, children cannot consent or you’re a Satanist. No child brides in America, no minors getting married. This increases divorce risk anyway.
  2. You can marry independently at 18 and join the military, this matches, so there’s no excuse to bring cases pleading exception.
  3. Minors are not considered to consent under any circumstances, again, or else you’re a pedo. No slippery slope, no questions.
  4. Seduction law is enforced when a married party is induced and coerced to adultery. Civil law unless there is also rape. The innocent married party can sue the seducer, unless there is evidence of cuckoldry.
  5. The maternal death rate is higher for teens for under-development reasons, this would not be difficult to bring into law.
  6. Dating apps to require legal verification of age, immigration status, criminal record AND marital status. Marital status is publicly available and free to reference, to avoid unwitting adultery. No excuses. Adultery is a common cause of abortion. This is relevant. Also, no deadbeats.
  7. Child support payment refusal becomes a crime, but self-sterilisation becomes free at 18. No excuses this way, again. Causing children to live in poverty induces the choice to abort.
  8. Life must legally still begin after birth for the specific reason of natural miscarriage, which is semi-common and genetic. Innocent mothers mustn’t be locked up as murderers for a wide range of reasons from trauma causing abortion to pollutants in the water.
  9. No more opt-out organ donation, it’s CCP policy. Oh wait, the UK has that. How Repo!
  10. You automatically have a right to your body, the government can’t just take your organs claiming Communist greatest need. This is Satanic, a kind of transhumanism, because it violates the Bible, it’s anti-Christian to coerce people into handing over their still-biologically alive (viable) but legally declared ‘dead’ relative to be carved up like a turkey, as happens in surgical abortion. See? Relevant*. Otherwise they’ll rule all fetuses to be dead legally (non-alive) and chop away. 3D print organs. No excuses, it’s a type of necromancy to body snatch. Christians need their body for Resurrection.
  11. Speaking of, ban minors from taking chemical abortions including the Pill, due to medical damage, permanent stunted development (from stoppered hormonal-genetic interactions) so young and unknown long-term side effects including cancer and water pollution. Make it widely known how the Pill works so both parents feel shame for reckless fornication (maybe make that a law? depends if you’re really conservative) and bring back the stigma again, its function is chemical abortifacient. It cannot work any other way to prevent pregnancy. Unless you’re also abstinent (true cause) and have an obscure proven medical reason to need it.
  12. Close all brothels, including strip clubs. Is America Christian or not? The Bible says these places are to be stopped entirely, there’s no little bit pregnant or little bit Sodom. This reduces trafficking and hence, aborted babies.
  13. Showing proof of age to view porn. According to UNICEF studies, children as young as 3-4 have viewed it, thanks to groomers evading this by saying “it isn’t illegal to let them see”. This way the pedos can claim the kids are sexually “active” (not MATURE) and thus can consent to child abuse. These children are attacked and the girls fall pregnant. Sensing a theme? Halt the chain of causation early on to stop the Satanic pedos. Also, make grooming an outright crime again to stop the SJWs who want to ‘just talk to your child about sexuality’. It isn’t education, it’s corruption. That used to carry the death penalty, make it do so again. They need to know how babies are made in biology, that’s all.
  14. Children can disavow their parents at 18 or upon earlier proof of abuse, violent or sexual. Stop giving pedos the “right” to access their victims because of blood, even when the child is an adult they can cause legal problems slanderously, claiming they have an alleged “right” to be seen/”visit”, as if the child is a concubine slave owned in perpetuity because of how they were made. Children do not choose their parents and sometimes a parent is your worst nemesis. Let them break free. The child receives no money from that parent going forward to prevent false claims. End the cycle of abuse. This will be considered a human right and there is no stigma for disavowing an abuser. No “But he’s your father/mother!” No, they’re a predator. Rapists don’t get to re-visit their victim for old time’s sake.
  15. AI on every phone (no server) to filter sexual pictures on the phones of minors and Christians can choose to apply this filter so they don’t see some creep’s dick pic. Make that a crime as digital flashing, they didn’t ask to see that. There’s a right not to see porn, it causes brain damage. Bring back the film code. Hollywood will hate it.
  16. When consensually made, both parents are legally responsible for the infanticide and justifying it in a public court, on record for both (in case they marry someone else). In surveys, women usually get abortions because the father made them, by refusing to marry them. So it’s either this or shotgun marriages. Mutual accountability would be great, right?
  17. Rapists have no parental rights, as a matter of human decency. The victim did not consent to babymaking (consent is a positive claim and must be proven). Women will be less likely to abort if they never have to see their abuser ever again. Nobody mentions this. It’s common sense. Nobody wants to see the person who ruined their life and most will do anything to reduce that risk. Make it clear that rape is also a theft of a woman’s fertility and allow her to sue for this, like medical bills. It deters rapists because rape is an extreme r sexual strategy! They don’t want to pay!
  18. No anchor babies. No double passports (Cabal sign). A house divided cannot stand. If you ruin this country you’re stuck here. Let them fear the Mob. No escape by plane and magic paper.
  19. The incestuous parent who conceived a rape baby with their child (or step-child) must be a death-penalty offence, no exceptions. Duty of care to a child (even adult child) is sacred. No “they’re an adult they consent” that’s grooming talk. End the cycle of abuse by the rope. This works.

This is all conservative and will increase birth rates. It won’t punish proper family formation.

If you fail to close these, completely, this will happen again.

*see tags

Conservative art death threats

Left Uses Threats, Violence to Stop Conservative Art

Conservatives often complain how little right-of-center content exists for them to consume. You can’t withdraw from pop culture, they cry. Engage, don’t retreat.

  • Make conservative art
  • Share conservative art
  • Inspire the next generation of conservative artists

That’s understandable, and smart. What happens when these same artists, daring to shake up the Left’s cultural stranglehold, runs into death threats?

When they said “make good art” they meant “art I find morally good, as an evil person”.

You could make a bloodied wax foetus and they’d praise it if you called it Liberty.

Call it Moloch and they’ll SWAT you.

Self-reliant people more satisfied in life

Shocker.

https://www.livescience.com/63094-conservative-meaning-of-life.html

Meaning is personal to each of us. However, a new study published June 15 in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science suggests that some people might be better at finding that meaning than others — and the difference may come down to politics.

According to the study, which compiled survey results from more than 50,000 participants in 16 countries, people who identified as political conservatives were more likely to find meaning and satisfaction in their lives than liberals were.

Political conservatives tend to be happier than liberals, a finding that has been labeled the ‘happiness gap’ in media reporting,” a team of psychologists from the University of Southern California (USC) wrote in the new paper. “One conservative commentator even described it as ‘niftily self-reinforcing; it depresses liberals.'”

 Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Right-wingers are different

It’s that time of year for a study-dump. Read until the end.

Better-looking (on AVERAGE):
https://sputniknews.com/viral/201801311061239797-physically-attractive-people-right-wing/

“Good-looking individuals are more likely to have right-wing political views than less physically attractive people, according to a university study.
The authors of the report, Rolfe D. Peterson from the US Susquehanna University and Carl L. Palmer from the Illinois State University, examined the connection between physical attractiveness and political beliefs, applying multiple surveys measuring people’s attractiveness.
“More attractive individuals are more politically efficacious than their peers and more likely to identify as conservative and Republican than less physically attractive citizens of comparable demographic backgrounds,” the report read.”

Comparable demographic background, an important control.

Better-looking again:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences/article/effects-of-physical-attractiveness-on-political-beliefs/D5214D0CAE37EE5947B7BF29762547EE
PDF at: https://about.illinoisstate.edu/clpalme/Documents/Peterson%20Palmer%20The%20Effects%20of%20Physical%20Attractiveness%20on%20Political%20Attitudes.pdf

“Controlling for socioeconomic status, we find that more attractive individuals are more likely to report higher levels of political efficacy, identify as conservative, and identify as Republican.”

SES control is important.

Better-looking:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272716302201

“Politicians on the right look more beautiful in Europe, the U.S. and Australia.”

How to tell May isn’t really right-wing.

They should also study disease load (emphasizing STDs, which do affect appearance) compared to partisanship.

Support meritocracy, oppose the cult of equalism:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597814000223

“Higher self-perceived attractiveness (SPA) increased support for inequality.”

Self-perceived, relative.

Have a ‘look’:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886916312028

“The political sympathies of scholars can be accurately assessed from photographs.”
“In contrast to politicians, Right-leaning scholars were not more attractive.”

The scholars haven’t hired image consultants.

What, do you think a man buys an expensive suit just for the suit?

“Right-leaning scholars were better groomed.
Controlling for grooming, Left-leaning scholars were more attractive”

This is supposed to be looking at genetic attractiveness, true attractiveness, not clothing/haircare/make-up?
Okay, I’ll let them have that one. They’re better at faking it, a trait of narcissism.

Less likely to cheat when expected to cooperate:
https://reason.com/blog/2014/07/22/socialists-are-cheaters-says-new-study

Neurologically different:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3092984/

“Political Orientations Are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults”
We found that greater liberalism was associated with increased gray matter volume in the anterior cingulate cortex, whereas greater conservatism was associated with increased volume of the right amygdala.”

So they’re more gender neutral in the brain?
https://www.webmd.com/brain/news/20050121/intelligence-may-be-gray-white-matter#1
Because the same IQ can still be produced by structural differences between the sexes.

“Researchers found major differences in the amount of gray and white matter in the brains of men and women of the same intelligence, suggesting that men and women may derive their intelligence in different ways.”

“”These findings suggest that human evolution has created two different types of brains designed for equally intelligent behavior,” says researcher Richard Haier, professor of psychology at the University of California, Irvine, in a news release. “In addition, by pinpointing these gender-based intelligence areas, the study has the potential to aid research on dementia and other cognitive impairment diseases in the brain”

Again, the same IQ score.

SAME.

Man Card isn’t a MENSA card, accomplish something.

Sexual dimorphism didn’t stop at the neck.

But white matter is generally more important for HIGH IQ:
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/412678/brain-images-reveal-the-secret-to-higher-iq/
White matter could only be imaged recently.

“They found a strong correlation between the integrity of the white matter and performance on a standard IQ test.”

Although grey matter can matter too, white matter cannot be denied EITHER:
https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article/17/9/2163/272753

Positive relationships were found between FSIQ and intracranial gray and white matter but not cerebrospinal fluid volumes. Significant associations with cortical thickness were evident bilaterally in prefrontal (Brodmann’s areas [BAs] 10/11, 47)

IQ so real you can scan someone’s brain, almost.

and posterior temporal cortices (BA 36/37) and proximal regions.

Sex influenced regional relationships;

Before any sexist bitch goes to twist this, different does not mean inferior. This is a study of intelligence, NOT stupidity.

You can’t prove a negative and individuals are not groups?

The obvious pointed out? Okay, let’s continue.

women showed correlations in prefrontal and temporal association cortices, whereas men exhibited correlations primarily in temporal–occipital association cortices.

K.

An idiot reading that would assume women are smarter, prefrontal doesn’t always mean smarter, necessarily, it’s just a group-level skew of structural difference. However, it does explain the higher female average.

Again, average.

In healthy adults,

important distinction, many brain studies are conducted on the undeveloped (teens) or pathologies

neither of which generalize to a HEALTHY, ADULT population

[sorry for the smart people tuning in, idiots twist what I type]

greater intelligence is associated with larger intracranial gray matter and to a lesser extent with white matter.

Plot twist: both matter.

Almost like we evolved.

Variations in prefrontal and posterior temporal cortical thickness are particularly linked with intellectual ability.

PF – registered as female strength, generally.
PT – registered as male and female strengths, generally.

This isn’t better/worse, it’s apples/oranges.

Even race overwhelms sex as a confound in IQ (so does class, education etc).

Sex moderates regional relationships that may index dimorphisms in cognitive abilities, overall processing strategies, or differences in structural organization.”

Trans. sex differences real yo.

Overall, key word.

Moderates, may index, differences. As in, these processes still occur but like a road trip, each take different paths different enough to map but not distinct enough to be unrecognizable.

Reminder

Estrogen, which men also NATURALLY produce, also boosts brainpower.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/estrogen-boosts-brainpower-actually/
Study here but my commentary explains it:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4104582/
Whereas, everyone knows, testosterone (which women also produce) correlates to violence.
Nothing is all-good, all-bad in hormones.
“A moment of silence for all the women in history who married dumber men.”

They should study political economic wing and compare it to natural/un-supplemented hormone levels.
As in, a man who ‘needs’ steroids for vanity is less of a man.

They should also look at whether men going onto steroids drop in IQ score because it competes with their organic estrogen that makes them handle stressors better.

[Update: after checking, they did. Here it is.]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3608708/

“long-term high-dose AAS exposure may cause cognitive deficits, notably in visuospatial memory.”

“These results remained stable in sensitivity analyses addressing potential confounding factors.”
The dumb jock stereotype is true!

WAIT.

It gets better!

Actually, it causes brain damage!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25986964
This is amazing!


Fake masculinity is really bad for men. You can’t cheat code becoming a man.

CONCLUSIONS:

Long-term AAS use is associated with right amygdala enlargement and reduced right amygdala rsFC with brain areas involved in cognitive control and spatial memory, which could contribute to the psychiatric effects and cognitive dysfunction associated with AAS use.

The MRS abnormalities we detected could reflect enhanced glutamate turnover and increased vulnerability to neurotoxic or neurodegenerative processes, which could contribute to AAS-associated cognitive dysfunction.

Now the right amygdala enlargement sounds like the natural conservative difference but understand it’s rooted, not in experience and genuine masculine virtue, but chemical dependence. Without the drugs, it’ll shrink right back and possibly atrophy.

This would be like congratulating a tall guy who took HGH for his superior genetics. No. It’s a superficial, fake result.

The cognitive control is impaired, that’s regression. The meat head stereotype is true, biologically. Useless.

I wonder how many male suicides were on steroids? Both groups happen to be middle-aged men in fear of the Wall.

Whatever the details, it makes them biologically vulnerable compared to their natural state, the opposite of fitness.

Ironically, they’re more vulnerable to microplastics and xenoestrogens. 

To further screw the point in… that brain region explicitly mentioned?

Right amygdala rsFC study:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3997418/
“In high HA scorers, we also observed stronger right amygdala rsFC with the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), which is implicated in negative affect regulation.”
It’s a girly brain thing to do with harm avoidance. [aka common sense]
“may represent a vulnerability marker for sensitivity to stress and anxiety (disorders).”
So the meat head with reduced volume (therefore not conservative*) is dumber, senses dulled by drugs and more likely to fail to get the brain signals to avoid trouble. Sounds like a future in handcuffs. They can’t perceive danger nor regulate negative emotions like anger or shame after rejection. Basically, they’re future chimp-outs waiting to happen, whatever their race**. Less able to CONTROL emotions, the broflakes.***

Hair-trigger temper calling out people for looking at him.

The guy who picks on people but never actually expects to get hit.

Will grab a woman and be shocked she slaps him. That’s the one.

*because, again “greater conservatism was associated with increased volume of the right amygdala.”

[as referenced above]

yet they have less?

So steroids make men more left wing. It isn’t the correct area and type to be considered otherwise.

ISN’T SCIENCE FUN, FELLOW RED PILLS.

ACCEPTING FINDINGS EVEN WHEN WE DON’T LIKE THEM, BRO.

My guess is it messes with their sexual reward system and produces impotence, porn addiction, dissatisfaction.

https://www.simplymedsonline.co.uk/blog/how-does-anabolic-steroid-use-affect-erectile-function/

Steroids do cause impotence (PC term is ED). Does it lower sperm count?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744441/

DING DING DING WE HAVE A WINNER.

“Anabolic steroids abuse and male infertility”

I am good at this.

“Infertility is defined by the WHO as the failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse and a male factor is present in up to 50 % of all infertile couples. Several conditions may be related to male infertility.

Substance abuse, including AAS, is commonly associated to transient or persistent impairment on male reproductive function, through different pathways. Herein, a brief overview on AAS is offered. Steroids biochemistry, patterns of use, physiological and clinical issues are enlightened. A further review about fertility outcomes among male AAS abusers is also presented, including the classic reports on transient anabolic steroid-induced hypogonadism (ASIH), and the more recent experimental reports on structural and genetic sperm damage.”

hypogonadism = tiny balls

“In layman’s terms, it is sometimes called interrupted stage 1 puberty”

You’d have to be a moron already to think supplementing that shit makes you manly.

Nice muscles bro, shame you hit rewind on puberty!

They impair their body’s ability to naturally produce testosterone in future…. idiots.

Darwin Award category?

Big Pharma’s best customer? Like Israel’s Viagra use. Israel and America, top consumers.

https://www.haaretz.com/life/MAGAZINE-israeli-porn-is-booming-and-the-industry-insists-it-s-about-more-than-just-sex-1.5472336

(((Coincidence)))

**Logically we should restrict steroid use to lower the crime rate. We can’t have gorilla people chimping out and blaming da drugs.

***There are few things less masculine than a man who throws tantrums because Hulk RAGE entitlement. The mantrum has neurological correlates, as we can see.

As for the ACC lefty brain finding:

https://www.neuroscientificallychallenged.com/blog//know-your-brain-cingulate-cortex

..I didn’t forget.

“Through these connections, the ACC is thought to be involved with a number of functions related to emotion including the regulation of overall affect, assigning emotions to internal and external stimuli, and making vocalizations associated with the expression of states or desires.

No comment.

The ACC also seems to contribute to the regulation of autonomic and endocrine responses, pain perception, and the selection and initiation of motor movements. Additionally, there are other areas of the ACC that are involved in various aspects of cognition ranging from decision-making to the management of social behavior.”

And about sexual potency….

I order these for a reason.

Right-wingers more sexually satisfied:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/8943/study-conservatives-have-better-sex-lives-liberals-amanda-prestigiacomo

“A new YouGov survey, which asked over 19,000 participants from the UK, France, Germany, Sweden and Denmark about both their politics and their sex lives, has found conservatives to be happier in the bedroom than liberals, with those identifying as “very right-wing” found to be the happiest.”

So much for the benefits of slutting. Muh experience. Yes, experiencing a burning sensation.

If you want a better sex life, don’t be a manwhore.
Chastity is a virtue. Less stress when single, hot sex when married.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/02/right-wing-people-more-likely-to-be-happier-with-their-sex-lives/

Sluts reee.

I deserve an Ig Nobel for all this connection-making. It could save the West.

https://ifstudies.org/blog/baby-bust-fertility-is-declining-the-most-among-minority-women

While I’m putting out fires imagined by shrill men.

Click through.

BAFFLED, JENKINS!

Only makes sense with r/K

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/believe

I wasn’t bristling at all. If it’s true, my incredulity wouldn’t matter whatsoever.

“I find that hard to believe” – faux skeptic incredulity, the worst kind.

Now do one line of posts that offends Democrats. IQ? Debt, GDP? RacexCrime?

I wish they did a series of studies measuring the blood pressure (stress) of different political factions when exposed to counterarguments. Who would be most triggered… and least?

We have something close, however. Long live Haidt!

ACHTUALLY, Conservatives understand the moral reasoning of the Left, but they don’t understands ours (they can’t explain it back).

Haidt: Conservatives Understand Liberals Better Than Liberals Understand Conservatives

When I speak to liberal audiences about the three “binding” foundations – Loyalty, Authority, Sanctity – I find that many in the audience don’t just fail to resonate; they actively reject these concerns as immoral. Loyalty to a group shrinks the moral circle; it is the basis of racism and exclusion, they say. Authority is oppression. Sanctity is religious mumbo-jumbo whose only function is to suppress female sexuality and justify homophobia.”

Bigots project.

Most amusing, they lie about the definition of bigot.

To prove my Kredentials:

Loyalty – the real Social Justice.  (Future)

Authority – competence and investment. (Present)

Sanctity – protection, preservation and value. (History)

The Left’s concerns are childish by comparison. Those values build societies. The Left cannot live in a civilization unless the hard work was done first by workers with those values. It does not belong to them to give away by their own admission (no loyalty, no ingroup preference, no ingroup, nothing owed/received). The modern Left is not the worker, it is the party of the petit bourgeois. That is why it dies. It died with the 20th century that tested it.

Left wing ideology has murdered hundreds of millions of people (Little Black Book of Communism). Social engineering was a tyrannical abuse of human rights e.g. the multicultural experiment. Slavery continues as trafficking and odious debt. Are most pedophiles left or right wing? Guess who’s on the “right side of history”?

We’re called right, we are right and in this century, we’ll be proven right.

If the Left won’t kill you in the womb, they’ll kill you with debt for their charity fun.

You’re free to celebrate your own genocide.

Liberals hate themselves

Unhappy, same thing.

https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/liberals-likely-unhappy-people-yoga-edition/

Scholars on both the left and right have studied this question extensively, and have reached a consensus that it is conservatives who possess the happiness edge. Many data sets show this. For example, the Pew Research Center in 2006 reported that conservative Republicans were 68 percent more likely than liberal Democrats to say they were “very happy” about their lives. This pattern has persisted for decades. The question isn’t whether this is true, but why.

Trying to tear down the happy just makes you more miserable.

The guilt rots them from the inside, it’s great to watch, you can trace it on their features. First smug, then concerned, then doubtful, disillusioned, hopeless, angry, depressed, sullen.

So capitalists are smarter, happier, donate to charity more and are better-looking?

Shit, I’d want equality too!