Paper: Abortifacient vaccine technology

Damage to FSH and LH could make someone permanently infertile including women. Those are key for supporting a pregnancy. Infertility in women can be indicated. Children of Men is set in England….

The characteristic sloughing of the endometrium caused by fucking with hCG levels is called a decidual cast.
It’s the reason some women (not all) with endometriosis can miscarry so often. They’ve weaponised it.

h/t Anonymous Conservative for gene therapy (convid) link, where I still comment sometimes to clarify, despite obstacles in my personal life preventing me from posting much here for personal safety.

https://montanadailygazette.com/2021/04/16/unvaccinated-women-report-miscarriages-after-interactions-with-vaccinated-people/

“After reading hundreds of testimonies, the Instagram user learned many women experienced desidual casts, the lining of the uterus falling out. A quick Google search of the term showed a spike in search results in January 2021, when the Covid-19 vaccines were being introduced.”

https://www.rubylove.com/post/2017/01/19/decidual-casts-and-menstruation

Endometriosis is a regenerative medical issue which involves the appearance of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity, causing pelvic discomfort to be felt by the patient and in some cases, infertility. It has been discovered that the progesterone treatment used for endometriosis oftentimes leads to the formation of a decidual cast.

One of the most common contraceptives, forced on minors in the UK. They’re even telling virgins they ‘need’ it ‘just in case’, I had personal experience of shutting down those lies as a teen. I’m not taking shit with side effects and no longitudinal studies on fertility because my doctor assumes I’ll magically turn into a whore. That’s just insulting. Their only excuse after that was ‘period pains’ ….yes they were STILL trying to push it….. I was like…. I’ll stick to Ibuprofen, thanks? Progesterone causes PMT so if you’re wondering why so many modern women are bitchy….. it’s the progesterone only pill. I’ve had to drop friends after they started taking it. They became raging banshees. They suddenly hated men too. Pretty sure most SJWs are on it. Men on xenoestrogens exhibit PMT like symptoms, also those on steroids. So it isn’t just women being poisoned.

So HCG issues + progesterone = …….

Without endometriosis, it still occurs

The use of consolidated oral preventative pills may prompt the formation of decidual casts. There have been cases of dysfunctional uterine draining where the patient was prescribed a monophasic oral preventative, and an extensive decidual cast was discovered amid the treatment regimen. The same will happen in cases of treating oral pills for an adolescent menorrhagia. Medroxyprogesterone acetic acid derivation (DMPA) is an injectable type of prophylactic which has been demonstrated to cause the development and conveyance of decidual casts as well.

Things the men commenting on this wouldn’t know. Use it wisely.

The manosphere’s delusion

https://nypost.com/2017/09/02/cheap-sex-is-making-men-give-up-on-marriage/

The wages of sin, the fruits of the Sexual Revolution. Death.

https://www.npr.org/2019/05/15/723518379/u-s-births-fell-to-a-32-year-low-in-2018-cdc-says-birthrate-is-at-record-level

Immigration won’t save you.

Keep telling yourself you’re not responsible.

For pushing the very anti-natal propaganda you recognise ruined the Boomers generally.

No “muh birth rate” kvetching. Especially when many men are 50% responsible for chemical abortions by conceiving with a woman on the Pill. Gametes fuse into a zygote, that’s conception, genetically. A new being conceived.

https://www.diffen.com/difference/Gamete_vs_Zygote

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/conception

. 1. a. Formation of a viable zygote by the union of the male sperm and female ovum; fertilization.

The manosphere is in hard bluepill denial about this. You’ve aborted your own kids if a condom wasn’t used.

https://www.usnews.com/news/healthiest-communities/articles/2020-04-29/us-marriage-rate-drops-to-record-low

it’s like a bad joke, how do you make white men genocide themselves?

you make sterility a virtue signal

Social and economic shifts in the U.S. are visible through the lens of the country’s marriage rate, measured as the number of marriages per 1,000 people. That rate has fluctuated since the early 1900s, most notably around times of great historical significance, according to the report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

For example, the marriage rate reached 12 per 1,000 in 1929 – the advent of the Great Depression – before falling to 7.9 in 1932. It then began a sporadic but upward climb, reaching an all-time high of 16.4 as the country emerged from World War II in 1946. The marriage rate fluctuated for the most part until the early 1980s, the data shows.

From 1982 to 2009, marriage rates fell fairly steadily, and then hovered around 6.8 to 7 per 1,000 through 2017.

Your anti-natal propaganda is worse than the Great Depression.

and other white men laugh at you, behind your back

from a vasectomy story:

solipsism, it has a name

Should add genetic suicide.

Make corrupting the youth a crime again. It causes literally most of our demographic problems.

re UK, repost for SEO

fertility is economic, including the social/female requirement of marriage first

most births are still best predicted by marriage

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/characteristics-of-mother-2-in-england-and-wales-2013

UK 2013 data, table 1:

live births WITHIN wedlock, all ages: 

367,618

live births OUT of wedlock, all ages:

330,894

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/marriage-rate-uk-latest-figures-lowest-record-ons-a9464706.html

More America:

https://ifstudies.org/blog/no-ring-no-baby

A large part of the decline in birth rates can be directly accounted for by a factor unlikely to be influenced by those birth-targeted incentives: marriage. That is, most long-run change in fertility can be accounted for by changes in the marital composition of society.

DIRECTLY.

Memorise this chart and imagine me slapping you every time you blame something else.

Essentially all of the decline in fertility since 2001 can be explained by changes in the marital composition of the population.

Married, single, and divorced women are all about as likely, controlling for age and marital status, to have kids now as they were in 2001.

But today, a smaller proportion of women are married during those peak-fertility years.

You all disgust me.

Five minutes of basic research, you basic bitches of redpill.

And the guys who pushed it, you knew about them too. You knew what they were about. No blaming the out-group.

This is amusing.

Yes Roosh, White Nationalists Want to Control Sexual Behavior

They want to sterilise you (hCGβ)

It isn’t just Mark of the Beast, the Satanists want to sacrifice all your children, including potential. All count to Moloch.

The Mark is also a marker of infertility. Mark(er) of the Beast (whose sacrifice is what).

You know, owned infertility, like a pet. The Bible says never to get tattoos, and your duty on this earth is to be fruitful and make godly children. Scroll for just studies but context is important, I feel.

HCG-beta sterilises women (and children), what’s the bet it’ll be in one dose of one mandatory thingey, eventually?  As you’ll see, all it needs is one. It mimics fatal cancer, encouraging the body to shut down reproduction to struggle to fight it off. Maybe not the first dose officially to force you all, better space it out to avoid suspicion.
I wonder where they’ll put this, along with other sterilising agents? Mistakes were made, woops! You can’t sue!
Am I crazy now? I’m only covering HCG-beta today, 101 style. Do your own damn research and share share share the studies, 4chan, 8kun, the works.

Sterilization programme imminent like Bill and others did in Nigeria (and other places). Then again with HPV (which reduces fecundity, when checked with age-peers) as previously covered by me.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1831725/

“The fear of vaccines: Fear that a vaccine used by the WHO to combat polio can cause sterility in both men and women, has spurred some Northern Nigerian states to block a crucial vaccination campaign that is aimed at eradicating the disease from West Africa. “

And you call Africa dumb? They’re not.
Herd immunity is a myth, also covered by me, even at 100% “coverage” (impossible) doesn’t work (unfalsifiable, fake science).
Remember, most spanish flu dead were vaccinated soldiers (and nurses), that’s why it got so many young people.
A pawpaw tested positive for this, FFS. A fruit and a goat!
They never say in ‘outbreaks’ of measles etc, how many who got sick ALREADY HAD the vaccine (most), they’ll deflect or try to hide that topic.

ONTO THE STUDIES:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627648/
“Efforts to produce a contraceptive vaccine targeting human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) face several important challenges.”

A ‘vaccine’ to stop you from reproducing. Don’t believe me?

Journal of Reproductive Immunology:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165037809004537
“Gonadotropin-releasing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin β based recombinant antibodies and vaccines”

Vaccines have been developed against both GnRH and hCG and these have undergone Phase I/II clinical trials documenting their safety, reversibility and efficacy. The heterospecies dimer hCG vaccine prevented pregnancy in women of proven fertility without impairment of ovulation or derangement of menstrual regularity and bleeding profiles.”

Jump through their evil hoops and they might let you be a free human again. Keep reproduction free! Also, end medical segregation. Slaves weren’t allowed to breed until their master said so.

Anti-fertility vaccines, you only naturally express it when you have ‘advanced’ cancer.

“Ectopic expression of hCG/hCGβ is observed in many advanced stage cancers of various origins.”

Mandatory? Medical Marxism argument: I can violate your body with bio-rape implants because it may possibly help me, theoretically – or some hypothetical person.

MEN AREN’T IN THE CLEAR.

“These reduce serum testosterone to castration levels causing atrophy of the prostate.”

CHEMICAL CASTRATION.

The prize is disappointment. No lollipop.
“Castration levels” you couldn’t make it up. Evil has a PhD.

Guessing atrophy is permanent? Sounds kinda permanent. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1876172/
Linked to ‘adverse prognosis’ (death).

Expression of the free β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCGβ) in malignant tumors is frequently associated with aggressive disease. The pretreatment serum concentration of hCGβ is an independent prognostic variable in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The three so-called type II genes (hCGβ 3/9, 5, and 8) have been shown to be up-regulated in relation to type I genes (hCGβ 6/7) in some malignant tumors.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167569986900290

“This vaccine consists of a synthetic peptide representing, the carboxy-terminal 37 amino acids of hCG beta subunit coupled to diphtheria toxoid. The immunogen is pre- pared by linking the peptide to the carrier using a bifunctional reagent (6-maleimido caproic acyl N- hydroxy saccinimide ester)is in a manner to achieve predictable…”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0264410X89900431

Search engine (DDG) description:

“The second candidate vaccine is oLH.hCG-TT/CHB: a-subunit of ovine LH associated with hCG, linked to carriers such as TT or cholera toxin chain B (CHB). The third vaccine preparation is a physical mixture of hCG and oLH, each linked to carriers. These vaccines have completed phase I clinical trials in five centres in India.”

1989 publication date.

1989

When you click:

Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females. This review discusses developments in anti-fertility vaccines at the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India. A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals depending on the site at which the injection is given, has passed through field testing and is expected to be on the market in the near future. Vaccines inducing antibodies against the human chorionic gonadotropin have gone through phase I trials with satisfactory results. A vaccine producing a consistently bioeffective antibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate after due experimenation in animals and toxicology studies. Research to identify sperm antigens for incorporation into second generation vaccines is in progress.

This, in 1989. I didn’t exist then. Imagine what they have now.

Calling white people (or any) ‘females’ and ‘males’ is dehumanizing, especially intended to destroy you/r genetic lineage. Your God-given right. It just so happens black men recently popularised this use in rap, which isn’t controlled by a certain group with certain investments, is it? Phew.

They want you allergic to your own body. Autoimmune infertility, sterilization by antibody, it’s right there. CASTRATION, CHEMICAL CASTRATION.

A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals”

It relates to cancer vaccines
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3172635/

Anti-fertility vaccine again
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1600-0897.1981.tb00063.x

“Peptides representing the amino acid sequence of the carboxy‐terminal of the human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) beta subunit were used in studies to determine whether an immunogen could be prepared that would be suitable for an HCG antifertility vaccine. Peptides of varying length were conjugated to several macro‐molecular carriers, in varying peptide‐carrier ratios…”

Chemical human neuter sounds so cruel.

They think they own you.

Target for cancer therapy, apparently? Nice excuse. Sounds so comfy, philanthropy.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11500441_Tumor-associated_antigen_human_chorionic_gonadotropin_beta_contains_numerous_antigenic_determinants_recognized_by_in_vitro-induced_CD8_and_CD4_T_lymphocytes

WHO knows?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/15504700_Functional_and_immunological_relevance_of_the_COOH-terminal_extension_of_human_chorionic_gonadotropin_b_Implications_for_the_WHO_birth_control_vaccine

“The World Health Organisation (WHO) Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines has selected the pregnancy hormone human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as a target molecule for a contraceptive vaccine.”

You didn’t wanna breed, right?
How much would you pay for an anti-anti-fertility vaccine?
Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines….. selected…. target… fucking Nazi ‘eugenics’ again.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7693535

Christians are up first.

They later changed the name for being too obvious on a scale of really fucking obvious to taking le piss. Henceforth, it has become really fucking obvious.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1874951

“Over the past 18 years, the WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation has been supporting basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines directed against the gametes or the preimplantation embryo.”

So including chemical abortion, like the Pill.

18,years, as of writing, totally off the cuff.

BIRTH CONTROL VACCINES, THE PROGRESS CONTINUES:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12286012/

NO SHIT, THAT’S THE TITLE. They think they own you.

During 1986-1988, the WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction used the diphtheria toxoid as a carrier for a fragment of the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) molecule (a conjugate immunogen) and an immunostimulant in a phase I clinical trial of this prototype antifertility vaccine in sterilized women. Between 1990 and 1991, it conducted teratology studies in rats and rabbits to determine whether the vaccine causes fetal abnormalities. The vaccine did not adversely affect either the animals or their fetuses. Clinical trials of the vaccine’s effectiveness (phase II trials) are scheduled for 1992. At least 2 injections several weeks apart, are needed to produce an anti-hCG immune response which is only effective for 3-6 months, however. So the same components of the original vaccine were placed in a polymer to deliver the vaccine slowly over a prolonged and predetermined time frame. WHO hoped that this advanced vaccine would raise effective immunity levels long enough to last for at least 1 year after 1 injection. WHO is conducting dose-response and toxicity studies of this prototype vaccine in rabbits and baboons to identify the optimal dose which would elicit an effective immunity level over a desired period of time and would be safe for testing in humans. WHO hopes to begin a phase I clinical trial with this advanced anti-hCG vaccine in late 1992. WHO anticipates that the preclinical and clinical trials will reveal a need for further modifications and improvements. WHO is supported multicenter research on antitrophoblast vaccines which target membrane cells of the preimplantation embryo since 1985. It uses monoclonal antibodies (MABs) and recombinant DNA technology to identify and isolate surface molecules. So far this research has tested 15,000 MABs but is centering on 9 MAbs. A study in baboons showed that 1 MAB reduced fertility, even though researchers could only use minute amounts of the protein in the injection.

Population control = PR for genocide. Go after the guidestones people and their love of carving stone.

PR is rebranded propaganda to the post-war period, rebranded deliberately by the likes of one Bernays. That is historical fact.

Immunogenicity
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X96000461
“Vaccines based on hCG have been proposed as a means either to prevent metastatic cancr6 or to control fertility’. Approaches to development of such vaccines have been pursued usij either the complete beta sub unit of hCG (hCG-fl) or the 37 amino acid CTP alone”

Most people wouldn’t want an anti-cancer anything if it made them sterile.

https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/6/1/166/875911

“The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. Its formation, objectives and research activities”

“As a result of this inter national, collaborative effort, a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing, raising the prospect that a totally new family planning method may be available before the end of the current decade.”

Guess the year. Guess. I’ll tell you in a few lines.*

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277953695000378
“Immunization to regulate fertility…”

https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Beta-HCG
“produced by placental cells”

*It’s 1991 published above re WHO. 
PDF here: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.883.9964&rep=rep1&type=pdf

save save save

bookmark, usb, email, any way you can get this all out there

This one is tricksy.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0218-118?draft=marketing

“Even though the idea of a birth control vaccine was gaining traction

… WHO task force trial undertaken on women in Sweden testing the vaccine …”

described in SEO brief

paywalls should be illegal

maybe you can find this paper on the piratebay of academic papers

https://scihub.to/

No excuses. Weird they hide this recent one re Swedish info, because it’s ongoing?

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1016/S0968-8080%2897%2990087-2

Published 1997.

Contesting claims on the safety and acceptability of anti-fertifity vaccines

spellings are often deliberate to thwart SEO

Contesting claims on the safety and acceptability of anti-fertility vaccines

corrected

This paper describes the controversy surrounding anti-fertility vaccines, focusing on the antihCG vaccine. It deals first with the rationale that researchers give for the development of antifertility vaccines, and the specific requirements that they set for the new contraceptive method.
Two distinct prototypes of anti-hCG vaccines are clearly emerging, one of which might be
characterised as maximising safety and the other as maximising efficacy. A vocal group of
women’s health advocates have opposed the development of both prototype vaccines, pointing to
theoretical health risks and the potential for abuse, and call for a stop to further research. This
paper shows how the scientists’ discourse on safety and acceptability of the technology to future
users has changed in response to the critique of women’s health advocates. Finally, it reflects on
the role of women’s health advocates in contraceptive technology development, and the
responses of researchers to their actions.

They took over womens’ groups to avoid discussion of important issues.

TLDR trust the “scientists” what human ‘error’? let alone ‘evil’ trust the ‘experts’

you know, pre-replication crisis

scientists often own stock so….. null appeal

2015
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627648/

The possibility of a contraceptive vaccine targeting human chorionic gonadotropin has long been recognized, but never fully realized.

weird, previously they’ve claimed success in ‘trials’?

they think you’re stupid

you can’t ban something they claim doesn’t exist (yet)

Here we describe an epitope-specific approach based on immunogenic display of hCG-derived peptides on virus-like particles of RNA bacteriophage. A number of recombinant VLPs were constructed, each displaying a different hCG-derived peptide. Some were taken from the disordered C-terminal tail of the hormone, another came from an internal loop, and yet another was an epitope mimic produced by affinity-selection on an hCG-neutralizing antibody target. Immunization of mice with some VLPs yielded antisera that bound the hormone and neutralized hCG biological activity.”

neutralised, like a threat
neutered you – like a dog

share share share the studies, you don’t have to link to me just SHARE

I haven’t posted this previously to avoid it getting censored prematurely.
Is anyone else keeping a tally of how many times I can piss off the WHO or NWO people without being murdered? Just me?

Lower your sperm count, white male

You don’t want to become a member of the patriarchy, do you?

Because the impulse of white men to have children in a secure unit is just bigoted.

https://www.medicaldaily.com/condom-free-birth-control-shot-men-may-be-more-effective-other-methods-402599
Having children is evil, white men.

Buy this harmless expensive chemical concoction and trust your biological future to it.

“However, due to the rate of adverse effects, specifically depression and mood disorders, the researchers stopped enrolling new participants. Of the 1,491 reported adverse events, nearly 39 percent were found to be unrelated to the contraceptive injections. These included one death by suicide which was assessed not to be related to the use of the drug.”
I smell bullshit.

The lawyers told them to stop recruiting.

“Meanwhile, drug-related side effects included: injection site pain, muscle pain, increased libido and acne.”
Like women then, only not as bad.
Nobody should take hormones unless there’s something medically wrong with them.

First do no harm.

It’s almost like nature is telling you something is wrong.

I’m guessing the retardation or psychiatric dysfunction of later offspring would also go up.
They don’t look at that. They can plead ignorance later.

Cancer risk? nope, not looking

As for the manwhore pill:
“This only lasts a few days, making men temporarily infertile.”

They say temporary…. no such thing as temporarily INFERTILE.

That would eventually damage production altogether based on the daily formation in the male body.

Cumulative damage. Mutation risk.

Invest in STD medications, demand will surge.

If this isn’t about targeting white men, are we giving them out in Africa as a condition to receive aid for children they can’t feed?

Will this be a condition of deadbeat fathers to let the state support their children for them?

Or is this pushed on high IQ men, to shame them for wanting their income to go to their own bloodline?

Overt abortion pill use on rise

More people than ever are accessing abortion pills in the UK

Even though it’s legal, they don’t want it tracked. AKA limited, regulated by their blessed State.
The Pill itself is already abortifacient.

https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2012/12/the-pill-contraceptive-or-abortifacient/266725/
If that is its biological mechanism (it is) then it’s a form of abortion.

“Studies have not established that emergency contraceptive pills prevent fertilized eggs from implanting in the womb, leading scientists say.”

Naturally, they’re now lying about this and trying to cover up the way it literally works (what informed consent?) to push it legally, including on minors or those women still developing (into mid-20s).
Medically, the rule is if you’re not sure, don’t do it.

“Further inconsistency among pro-lifers is seen in the fact that greater opposition exists among abortion opponents for the morning after pill than for the regular birth control pill, which in most cases is the same medication taken hours later and in varying dosage, but working in the same way

Yes, the same way.
The Pill is a choice to sleep around and have others pay for your pleasure (but not alcohol or other drugs, oddly). Plan B is intended for rape victims. Not really a choice, and not about personal jollies.
That’s why the difference.

“In the case or rape, the intent of Plan B is not to stop life, but to stop the act of the rapist from reaching its ordered end: impregnation, which would be a form of success of the violent assault. Therefore, a Catholic health plan may include emergency use of Plan B in case of rape, provided it is accompanied by a pregnancy test.”

to prove they weren’t already pregnant and lying about the rape

exactly, if it were just pleasure the rapist wouldn’t be doing that kind of reproductive sex
pregnancy is the aim of heterosexual rape, always has been
that’s how r-types reproduce with K-types, otherwise it wouldn’t happen

Why contraception is wrong

Brief but a good point.

https://www.tfpstudentaction.org/resources/forgotten-truths/why-contraception-is-wrong-1

I’d add-
Sinning against the body, public health hazard, the psychiatric damage to both parties… ruined for marriage (probably with other people, so not even giving!).

Sex was celebrated in ancient times because it was fertile, not the act itself. Sterile sex isn’t really sex. It shouldn’t be respected or considered as sex. It’s like junk food acting like gourmet. Culture values this because it destroys us. Even the SJWs, handmaidens of decadence acknowledge that sexualisation is bad for everyone.

Within a marriage temporarily is one thing, there can be medical or financial reasons but there’s still conjugal rights to handle. Extramarital, premarital fornication? Abhorrent to anyone who claims to be Christian.

Pornography as weaponized degeneracy

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/02/23/pornography-weaponized-degeneration-population/

It’s at least a supernormal stimuli, deeply unhealthy.

comment

“Porno is basically Behavior Modification and Control 101. Control people’s sex drive (through porno) and you control their lives.”

Meanwhile, men who fornicate lie.

52% of men say they don’t benefit from women having access to free contraception

Okay, ban all of it. Including abortion, The Pill, implants and the patch.

Should a man insist on his marital rights if his wife finds him repulsive?

I have nothing to add, this is brilliant.

Throne and Altar

This dilemma was inspired by the discussion over at The Thinking Housewifehere.  I don’t want to focus on the specifics of the cases discussed there, though.  I’d rather think of the more general question.  I’ve showed before that wives have a duty to render the marriage debt to their husbands–that this is the unambiguous position of Christianity and that it has an important natural function.  That was looking at things from the wife’s point of view.  Now let’s look at things from the husband’s point of view.  Given that his wife usually must comply with his requests, when is it right for him to make them?  As the head of the household, the husband must not privilege his own desires; if anything, he should disfavor himself so that his authority will more clearly seem to be motivated by the common good.

I think the answer is, a husband…

View original post 441 more words

The ultimate contraceptive

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/07/03/bill-gates-temporary-sterilization-microchip-in-beta-female-testing-by-end-of-year/

Chipped like a cow. Worst of all, you know the feminists would dumbly push for this to be mandatory (because freedom of choice!)

The chip can be implanted into the hip, arms or beneath the back.

Bill Gates and Melinda foundation has funded the research and the prototype is ready for human testing.

The chip’s size is 20mm by 20mm by 7mm. The reservoirs of hormones would be stored on a microchip of 1.5cm. The chip’s data would always be encrypted so that others (cybercriminals or hackers) cannot access the information contained in the chip or misuse/alter or destroy it.

That includes the woman chipped.

They’ve been doing this for some time, this is why IS refuse vaccines for their little girls: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/hidden-news-un-tetanus-vaccines-to-kenyan-women-contain-abortive-chemicals/

As usual, “The main target” for the testing phase of the chips are women in third-world countries. That means African and Indian women will be human guinea pigs, subject to more of Gates’ destructive horrors, like paralyzing nearly 50,000 Indian children with his polio vaccine tests. Or deaths/paralysis in Pakistan and more paralysis in Africa. But, I’m sure they will go back and make sure those women can conceive again, right? No one is admitting who is actually in control of the wireless capabilities of the implant that is allegedly impenetrable by hackers. Who does a woman see to have her ability to conceive turned back on? That would be an important piece of information, correct?

Interestingly, this news came right on the heels of New Zealand academic higher-ups seriously suggesting the temporary sterilization of all young teen girls – at least in New Zealand.

Brave New World much?

I think the Third World overpopulation needs to be solved as much as anyone, but not like this. Cut funding and they’d quit fucking.

Pregnancy costs too much….it’s inconvenient…it’s bad for mother and child, and other dehumanizing reasons were given. Ethics, compulsory slippery slopes and STD concerns aside, critics zeroed in on health and environment concerns regarding chemicals. Isn’t it convenient that Gates’ birth-control microchip should launch to save the world from those critiques? Who needs artificial hormones when wireless voltage and gold are there to alchemically or A.I.-chemically create “an artificial organ” through biotech, according to one of its developers. This is where Woman meets Machine to reproduce. Now there is no reason to protest – temporary sterilization for all!

This writer’s sentiments align with the anti-eugenics op-ed piece by Leading Edge, that said:

For me, one of the most troubling aspects of this proposal is the way in which it so flippantly treats normal healthy female fertility as if it were something that needs to be shut down or medicated against – like we would a disease, or some other physiological problem.

Fertility is healthy.
Another side effect of this abuse of technology, is that those little girls/women could be repeatedly raped with no evidence 9 months later to show for it.

I’d overload the little bastard with a localised electrical current… like say, a stun gun or cattle prod? Barring that, a simple EMP, cages that small are volatile against repeated blasts. And there’s always knocking the sweet thing out, cutting it out a la Matrix and implanting it in a fish.

Evolution DOES apply to human beings

This is so wrong I’m not going to bother attempting a full breakdown, it would be a book. Suffice to say, this is why evolutionary psychology exists, but sure, ask a philosopher on a subject they have zero qualification for. What about the Calhoun experiments, which his site has documented? He must be either joking or too stupid to see the connections.

Clue is in the name, Natural Selection, the 19th century term, applies in a State of Nature, an 18th century term that Darwin was referencing. A state of man, as in The State, will change variables e.g. land resources (housing), cost of living/unemployment/benefits, mate availability (cultural). Each culture reinforces a different reproductive strategy: Europe (white-majority) has future-time orientation (reinforced by cross-cultural studies of time perception), we reach an equilibrium with the amount of resources we have (now economy, used to be sheer territory for agrarian usage). We avoid tragedy of the commons, and genetic (racial) homogeneity allowed us to cooperate with our kin into prosperity (most of our history, Christianity was a useful meme for this). Low time preference.

He seems to think humans should be this constantly replenishing organism like a virus (let’s leave 8 children per woman in Africa, huh?) but we used to have those numbers because few would survive to adulthood. Technology and crucially, MEDICINE, have allowed us to invest more as parents (Trivers) to compete in a high-IQ demanding society. Quality of children is vital in the First World. As long as we don’t mess up the Malthusian trap by say, letting in African ‘boat people’ en masse or destroying the successful host culture until it breaks, the developed world will be stable.

Has he even read On Origin? Descent of Man? Natural Selection? Nope. He’s going by what school taught him, how redpill…..

rdj claps applause mhmm

Another point I need to make;

Female animals DO use drug contraceptives or otherwise control their estrus (hidden in humans) all the time, e.g.

The Ancient Romans had a contraceptive so successful they used it to extinction;

Silphium was an important species in prehistory, as evidenced by the Egyptians and KnossosMinoans developing a specific glyph to represent the silphium plant.[2] It was used widely by most ancient Mediterranean cultures; the Romans considered it “worth its weight in denarii” (silver coins). Legend said that it was a gift from the god Apollo.

This philosopher Roosh is citing doesn’t know jack about the relevant subjects and to anyone with a brain it shows.

Another counter-example or few, explain these;

r/K Selection Theory and amygdala damage in neoliberals. Conspicuous by omission. http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/the-theory-2/

Liberal fertility rates. Covered spectacularly well here: https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/expectations-and-reality-a-window-into-the-liberal-conservative-baby-gap/

Neoliberals are by no means the standard bearers of fertility, I believe he thinks this way due to urban living.
As for altruism, someone please force-read him: http://www.amazon.com/Pathological-Altruism-Barbara-Oakley/dp/0199738572
The West is experiencing increasing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compassion_fatigue

Those neoliberals and SJWs are already genetic dead-ends. Reproduction is a genetic arms race. They have lost. Anti-natal policies will do that.
When evolutionary pressures come back into play (they always do: war, famine, epidemic, etc. all the old favourites) what will happen? The victor experiences a ‘Baby Boom’.
When those selection pressures occur, on an infinite timescale it becomes a question of WHEN, what do you think happens to the human mind? Do you assume it just stays the same in your infinite wisdom of grosser biology?

david tennant 10 lol laughing cracking upThey're so stupid it's a laughriot

crying laughter lmaothrow head back laughter george jungle

Everyone is nice when resources are plentiful (Hence I reff’d r/K), it’s the ‘fat and happy’ stereotype of the glut (yes, that’s what that is). When resources become scarce, fight or flight become a reality. The nicest sweetest kindest neoliberals with a heart of gold would gut the granny next door if they were starving, the mindset is totally different, primal and beyond conscious control.

http://www.medicaldaily.com/now-entering-starvation-mode-what-happens-your-metabolic-processes-when-you-stop-feeding-280666
http://io9.com/5941883/how-your-body-fights-to-keep-you-alive-when-youre-starving
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-embodied-mind/201212/survival-mode-and-evolutionary-mismatch

Many people seem to believe that we human beings never arose from nature the way every other living thing did, that we are somehow “beyond,” removed from, nature. But this is a very unfortunate – even a tragic – misconception. Like all other living things, our ancestors were sculpted by Darwinian evolution to survive, reproduce, and thrive within a certain kind of environment. And when we live in environments, such as modern cities, that are drastically different from the environments that we’re biologically adapted for, we become subject to various “evolutionary mismatch” effects that can be extremely detrimental to our physical and emotional health.

http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v16/n5/full/nrn3918.html Latest research. Latest in a long line.

Research in animals and humans has revealed some of the structural, functional and molecular changes in the brain that underlie the effects of stress on social behaviour. Findings in this emerging field will have implications both for the clinic and for society.

http://www.madinamerica.com/2013/05/starvation-what-does-it-do-to-the-brain/

Click to access Young-Kelly-The-Psychological-Effects-of-Starvation-in-the-Holocaust.pdf


https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-excess/201309/turn-the-eating
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2010/12/bite_me.html
http://io9.com/is-cannibalism-natural-1615483037

European history, for instance, is filled with instances of shipwrecked crews and passengers who resorted to cannibalism—even if it meant murdering someone. But, those who were rescued, including the ships’ officers, never had charges pressed against them, as long as they assured the courts that a lottery had been held to determine who would die for the sake of the larger group

The classic example being: if you were in a plane crash would you eat the dead if it meant you could live?
Everyone’s answer is yes if they’re honest and self-aware.

When the axe is to the grindstone, your “fairweather friends” will leave. Humans doling out charity means nothing when they aren’t hard up themselves. If they can afford to give, what is the value? It becomes another trinket and status signalling shows us this, a vapid ploy from arrogance. This is a part of the Bible people misinterpret, it recognised this biological reality.

The people who eschew children would generally make bad parents (no instinct for example) and they choose to spend those resources on themselves, the ultimate in short-sightedness as children are the original pension (they look after you when you can’t work, maybe you babysit the grandchildren, a model older than the State and found in other primates). As it is, since the Sexual Revolution, pro-feminist anti-natal generations have encouraged the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_trap and have only themselves to blame when there aren’t enough tax-paying kiddies to pay their Social Security and other pie-in-the-sky social projects. (Boomers: You failed as humans, you failed to have enough kids to carry things on. It’s basic and you failed. Nothing else matters if there’s nobody to hand the baton to before you die.)

Corporal punishment used to root out the liars and the other genetic deformities (mental illness, serial killers, rapists etc). http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2015/03/politically-incorrect-paper-of-the-day-death-penalty-eugenics.html

Roosh again;

If evolution was in effect, it would have been impossible for the “veneer” of civilization to develop.

Civilization developed from pockets of successful tribes, we know it’s possible because we’re here, doofus. Humans are social animals, and one theory of intelligence is that it developed to enhance our ability to lie. Deception keeps civilized society afloat (white lies).

 There is no veneer specifically made for humans.

Humans have a thick cerebral cortex. Birds? Not so much.

The stories of man can’t help but include a puppet master that is controlling all our behavior. Before it was god, now it’s genes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcephalin
http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q8NEM0
Please stop talking, this is causing me physical pain to read. I mean;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurogenetics
and yesterday http://www.neuroscientistnews.com/research-news/missing-link-found-between-brain-immune-system-major-disease-implications

Roosh: People who believe in evolution victim-blame the organism when it acts outside the confines of evolution.

It’s almost like there’s a part of the brain recently-evolved which can suppress our baser instincts
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130314144356.htm

The brain’s prefrontal cortex is thought to be the seat of cognitive control, working as a kind of filter that keeps irrelevant thoughts, perceptions and memories from interfering with a task at hand. Now, researchers have shown that inhibiting this filter can boost performance for tasks in which unfiltered, creative thoughts present an advantage.

Any concept based in evolution is unfalsifiable if you demand a fucking time machine before you believe anything. Good methodology in evopsych rules this out.

Click to access ConwaySchaller2002.pdf


http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/books/tbs/media_articles/2002_11_butterflies.html

“Evolutionary psychology” is an approach and a set of theories, not a single hypothesis, so no single experiment can falsify it, just as no single experiment can falsify the theory of evolution or the connectionist (neural network) approach to cognition. But particular hypotheses can be individually tested, such as the ones on the relation of symmetry to beauty or the relation of logical cognition to social contracts, and tests of these are the day-to-day activity of evolutionary psychology. Journals such as Evolution and Human Behavior are not filled with speculative articles; they contain experiments, survey data, meta-analyses, and so on, hashing out particular hypotheses. And as I mentioned above, over the long run the approach called evolutionary psychology could be found unhelpful if all of its specific hypotheses are individually falsified.

They aren’t. They’re fodder for other subjects like genetics and neurology.

Evolution is an ongoing process. http://www.livescience.com/45685-human-evolution-not-over.html

Roosh has bought into the neolib frame that they are the end and future of the world.

Disappointing from a redpill. He’s trying to post-hoc rationalize his overt fertility clock.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-or-fiction-men-have-biological-clocks/

Yes, you wasted years of your life running after skanks and no decent wife material would touch you with a bargepole. You made that choice and must live with it (player burnout). You sneered at beta males off having kids. That door is probably closed to you now, in triple digits. #RedpillRegret