Link: IQ and corruption

https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/07/02/intelligence-and-corruption/

Throwing this here.

and the spread is nice and geographical — west to east/north to south: the anglos and the dutch (and are the scandinavians there? i can’t tell), my long-term outbreeders, are the least corrupt — then, working upwards on the chart (i.e. towards more corrupt) you’ve got the belgians and french and spanish — crossing the line into the more corrupt zone you start to have poland and hungary and the czech republic, places on the border of the hajnal line and the medieval outbreeding project — and then you get up to italy and the ukraine and russia.

east asia is, of course, interesting with singapore, hong kong, and japan being some of the least corrupt, and china being way up by corrupt italy. need to work on figuring out east asia one of these days! (~_^)

Nobody looks at Asia.

We know about Africa and Europe, we all know at this point. For about a century, we have known.

The interesting thing now is Asia/Europe. Are you all too scared to look?

Look at voting patterns, this is important.

so, there’s definitely a connection between intelligence and corruption, but that’s not the whole story, otherwise china and russia and italy and korea wouldn’t be very corrupt at all.

maybe their IQ scores are as real as their college transcripts?

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/college-cheating-iowa/

“How an industry helps Chinese students cheat their way into and through U.S. colleges”

Muh model minority.

Cheating is illegal BTW. It’s fraud and theft from the worthy applicants who lost out (zero sum).

Teachers help too: racketeering.

one thing that the chinese, russians, and italians have in common (don’t know much about the koreans) is a longer history of inbreeding as compared to the english and the dutch (see mating patterns series below ↓ in left-hand column). the awesome epigone did find a correlation (0.44) between consanguinity and corruption, but like i said then, i’m betting that the correlation would be stronger if we could calculate something like degree+length-of-time inbreeding.

All trader nations. Merchants. Former merchant empires.

see also: Corruption: The Exception or the Rule?

Brain size of males by race

https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/brain-size-race-and-iq/

includes this

The third piece of evidence is that the racial gaps have existed for a long time. In fact, based on the data from the tables above, the White/Black brain size gap doesn’t seem to have gotten any smaller during the 20th century.

Long before your 60s immigration acts.

The first thing to note is that brain size in the general population has a heritability of 87%. Thus, almost all the differences between individuals in brain size are caused by genes.

Secondly, we should note that racial brain size differences are present at, and even before, birth.

Keep blaming women though, that’ll help.

We need more direct studies like this. Gestation length and other variables must be accounted.

Menarche and other variables like WHR vary by race in the women too. More studies! MORE!

The manosphere is based on a myth of equalism, it was destined to fail.

Fourthly, racial brain size differences have been found all around the world. For instance, the Beals and Smith data set previously referred to features skulls from over 100 populations world wide. Many of the autopsy studies previously cited were done in East Asia, as were two of the MRI studies. This makes any gene independent cultural explanation less likely.

Fifthly, several studies have shown that mulattoes have an average brain size in between that of Blacks and Whites (Pearl, 1934Bean, 1906). This finding has been established on multiple occasions and is what a hereditarian hypothesis would predict since mulattoes are half White and half Black genetically speaking.

Do studies for other mixes.

Sixth, many traits which tend to co-evolve with larger brains also differ racially in a way that mirrors the body size adjusted brain size patternRushton and Rushton (2003) looked at 37 anatomical features which 3 textbooks on human evolution identified as tending to co-evolve in the hominid line with larger brains. For instance, larger pelvic size tends to co-evolve with brain size so that mothers can give birth to larger brained infants.  Rushton then utilized 5 forensic anthropology textbooks to look at racial differences in these traits. These traits followed the East Asian>White>Black pattern in 25 out of 31 cases. The probability of this happening at random is .000000001.

WHR is important.

Follow the tag, there are racial differences in studies.

And East-Asian isn’t a race, at best it’s a sub-group, do more studies. Properly.
Asians fail more often on IVF, also posted about that.

Similarly, Rushton (2004) showed that, across 234 mammalian species, brain size correlates with longevity, gestation time, birth weight, litter size, age of first mating, body weight, and body length. Various studies have shown that each of these variables also differ between the races in a way that, based on what we find across the animal kingdom, would predict the body size corrected brain size differences we observe (Rushton, 1995Templer 2006Rushton and Templer, 2009;).

Longevity – must look at averages e.g. not Danes for all whites nor Japs for all Asians.
Gestation – we know this varies.
Weight – control confounds.
Litter size – look at natural rate of twinning.
Virginity loss is r-select, do not want.
Body weight – vague.
Length – we already know racial height. Still, add to the rest, I guess.

Thus, we have six lines of evidence all of which would be predicted by a hereditarian view on racial differences in brain size. While each line of evidence on its own may not be compelling, the combination of all six seems to strongly imply that racial brain size gaps are partly heritable.

It is worth noting that the racial brain size gaps are probably not entirely attributable to genes. Some authors, including Richard Nisbett, have plausibly argued that nutrition also plays a role. However, there explanations are not mutually exclusive, no environmental variables has been shown to account for the majority of the gap, and,  as we have seen, there are many separate lines of evidence indicating that genes also play a role

A confound, in weight.

I suggest seafood consumption.

There is good evidence that the races evolved different brain sizes in response to climate. Specifically, various studies have found that a population’s brain size correlates with climate related variables. For instance, Pearce and Dunbar (2011) ‘s data set produces a correlation of .74 between a population’s brain size and its latitude. Similarly, Ash and Gallup (2007) found a correlation of .48 between the size of 109 fossilized human skulls and the latitude at which they were found. Further still, Bailey and Geary (2009) analyzed 175 skulls ranging in age from 10,000 years old to 1.9 million years old and found a correlation of -.41 between brain size and winter temperature and -.61 between size and latitude (larger brains were found in areas more distant from the equator).

How dare you use science.

The weebs might reee!

Lynn (2015) used Smith and Beals data set of 20,000 skulls from 122 populations to estimate that roughly 30% of the African-European IQ gap can be statistically accounted for by brain size differences. By contrast, brain size differences would actually predict an Asian-European IQ gap 35% larger than the one that actually exists. Thus, brain size is probably one of many factors, both biological and environmental, which account for racial intelligence differences.

Can ya rig the test?

https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/07/02/intelligence-and-corruption/

Easy, who’s the most innovative?

Especially before colonialism spreading info. Right?

You can rig IQ tests and college transcripts, not more advanced farming equipment when the other group invented it centuries prior.

One cult to rule them all, one cult to find them

Why are all cults, rape cults, masquerading as polygamy? The German church with the cages to this day?

Remember as you read about the sudden urgency in the history of the human species for correctional sex re-education.

I am going to explain the root of all PC (ambitious) and the purpose of Sex Ed re pedophiles.
I have gleaned this from teachers.

“And PC reacts against The Truth. Truth is to be subordinated to the goal of subversion. Unwanted Truths are Hate Facts. Universally known Truths are replaced with narrow scraps of bureaucratically defined principles; spontaneous and obvious knowledge is contested, undermined, broken-up and contradicted one fragment at a time and replaced with Professional Consensus (Peer Review).”

from https://thoughtprison-pc.blogspot.com/

I defy the Politically Correct Cult’s value judgments. I deny them and live in opposition to them.

This is rare. There are also efforts to learn their tactics and dig up what they really are. The process of sexualising children into endorsing their own rape (and, later, forming a ‘trauma bond’ they can easily gaslight as ‘love’) is the goal of pedophilia, both legally and literally. The corruption of the innocent was always a crime dating back to ancient times as a treasonous attack on everything society had developed and swore to protect. It also happened to be most important in the sexual realm but modern politics weirdly only recognises the political.

I thought the personal was political?

Can’t get more personal than intimate. Why was it ever the state’s affair what you did with various holes?

Celebrate or shame, that’s a moral claim from ‘postmodernists’ and a porous church/state boundary.

Kids already figure out p>v.

What you need to teach them is all the depraved stuff it wouldn’t occur to most adults to even TRY.

As Bandura taught us, kids don’t imitate any harmful instruction given by an authority figure with a duty of care based on trust.

Child rape hasn’t skyrocketed since they included instructions on it for ‘safety’.

An under-developed body isn’t more prone to injury and disease…. /s

Pair bonding is never mentioned and ‘free love’ pleasure considered the purpose of babymaking.

Darwin is never taught in classes ostensibly about reproduction…. any purpose beyond sexual narcissism is banned.

They won’t call a boyfriend a lover but they’ll tell you it’s practically compulsory, expected you shop around and refine your prostitution skills with a stream of them. No alternatives. Being used up like a cum rag is ‘fun’.

No statistical consequences, whither informed consent?

Shame the virgins because freedom and empowerment.

Straight men valued by how homosexual they behave, sexually. A soulless hedonic treadmill of superficiality, numbers and filthy stories of infection for the entertainment of people who hate you.

They won’t tell you how the Pill works (chemical abortifacient for couples fucking*) but they’ll tell you how great it is. Be a happy cum sponge because the Patriarchy is flattering you by wanting to fuck you and nothing else, ever. Being a hole that is a goal is your life’s goal.

False consciousness is at play.

“Let’s punish Patriarchy by being its whore” is the general gist.

According to Piaget’s work, prior to puberty children are biologically incapable of abstract thought. This is why nothing is real to them except Santa. They live in a fantasy of equally valid ideas, having no experience or brainpower to question it. This includes criticism or safety concerns.

‘Nuff said.

Naturally, in all their discussions of celebrating feelings, sexual disgust is banned.

No means no but you aren’t allowed to find someone ugly, physically and especially morally.

Wait, isn’t that the primary reason for No? Attraction just ain’t there?

That conveniently limits the options to deny them as social excuse, dunnit?

Attraction is from ‘animal magnetism’. Sexual attraction you’ve heard of, the inverse you haven’t.

Complete coincidence, huh?

“Sex Ed” makes sense only as AA for the horny and sexually repulsive. The unfit.

Moral repulsion must be extinguished as ‘hate’. It resembles independent thought.

Can’t have cultural standards creeping up on the degenerates, can we?

Can’t have women striking from the likes of Tindr and clubbing.
Selection pressures are the Devil, Hitler.

Sexual selection is oppression.

Explaining random -isms and tidbits of their fevered wet dreams.

Down with Western Civ

Er …. why?

What did Western Civ have, that none of the others have?

That normies, powerless normies who aren’t running banks or launching IPOs, would care about?

That young soy men would especially care about?

Sexual selection, freedom of choice. Sexual discretion.

It’s like Neo-Freudianism. Everything is about sex, all of politics is now rebranded as hate crime if you’re not doing the Devil’s tango with a fat borderline tranny. A multicultural orgy of “acceptance” because who has lower standards than a Third Worlder accustomed to drinking their own shit? Sex slaves deported if they don’t comply, EE women…

This keeps the weak men in line with dopamine hits, pacified from political rebellion so it is required weaker-willed women are caught early in childhood, at their most docile.

The personal is NOT political, telling people how to use their bodies is tyranny.

No borders, no escape. Everything they do makes sense, suddenly.

When did Sex Ed become suddenly vital to the re-education of children?

Around the time Darwin was writing about the quality barriers to existence.

Minus the gaslighting efforts, the cream of the genetic crop would marry out of the dating scene and never give the creepy losers who want to rape them ‘a chance’.

Chance? This isn’t equality. It’s sanity. Ambiguity makes everyone think they’re desperate.

Why are there more pedo teachers than ever before? Boundary formation.

Personal boundary testing.

[If a person wants to fuck you, knowing you don’t want them, that’s a rapist. Consent is not complex. Assume no and move on.]

Follow the slutty model, girls, the role model.

White guilt, white models.

Why is James Bond white? How are those kid’s films?

Kids who believe Brave New World style that their body belongs to anyone who gives them the insult of cheap attention (lechery) will never lead to adults with a healthy sense of self-ownership, dignity and property rights, sworn enemy of the Cultural Marxist.

Instead they’ll eat their feelings and medicate with a void where identity and pride should be. The repressed repulsion will become anti-natal, morphing into a bizarre desire for sex but a disgust for babies.

Disgust for the degenerate becomes disgust for their body’s reproductive function and the truly innocent.

Babymaking, the conceptual association divorced of ‘pleasure’, stripped of excuses, triggers deep feelings of shame and loathing, for reasons too long repressed to explain.

It’s an easy link to test: more sexual partners versus disgust at the thought of parenthood.

If you want to trigger leftists, including the hidden ones, tell them sexual repulsion is a human right.

Any meme effort that cuts this Gordian knot instantly exposes and kills their grassroots support.

Sexual orientation isn’t a choice now, is it? Like how being male and female never used to be a choice.

See, the ‘sexuality is a choice’ stage is actually the next one. Asexuals, just try it ‘fluidity’, female Viagra, the Pill already made women (and male users/beneficiaries) less choosy, more unnatural, biologically.

If old men didn’t have access to Viagra, what would they do with their time?

If young men didn’t assume all young women were on the Pill, who would they flirt with?

MOTHER Nature has limits for good reason. Masturbation with another person is postmodern freakishness.

This repulsion line cuts off both Hydra heads, forever. It exposes the true ‘rape culture’.

Why did the SJW and Muslim rowing on national TV seem like allies?

Like predators fighting over a still-dying piece of flesh?

Trying to discredit sexual repulsion as an impulse of evolutionary protection. Libertarians should be outraged. Your right to say NO.

Suddenly all the tradthots and cuckservatives think if you don’t want a particular race, you’re genociding them.

*Alabama hasn’t outlawed all abortion because the Pill is still dispensed to the ‘sexually active’. Because rape babies are fine but their hooker ‘mistress’ could tell the wife.

Missing babies

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-41122888

Not to be funny, but is she sure the child had actually passed or wasn’t simply “pronounced” dead so they could take it away and do whatever they wanted?

It’s a very big difference. The rush to take it away before she saw it suggests latter.

If it was only pronounced, it could’ve been sold.

You can give children drugs so the pulse becomes impossible to detect without machines.
This can convince relatives to be blackmailed into “organ donation” aka human butchery.

Children and especially young women go “missing” in morgues all the time.

Note the gaslighting as she asked questions – the State owns you all like cattle and your consent doesn’t really matter.

Killing the entrepreneurial spirit

https://pjmedia.com/trending/alternative-start-ups-cut-off-from-financial-services-in-overnight-political-purge-by-stripe/

“Start your own platforms!” they said.

You assume an even playing field.

It’s as corrupt and political as the Indian government.

In order, the worst things to be from least to most.

Straight, male, white, conservative, Christian.

Being Christian is unforgivable.

Sauce?

http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2018/05/before-you-tell-me-what-you-know-tell.html

Huh. That would work on economics [1].

I prefer a different tactic since few are intellectually honest.
You can get away with throwing crumbs for those.

1. I promise something based on my talents.
2. They laugh at me.
3. I wait.
4. It happens.
5. They cry.
6. I laugh.

Repeat as needed. Most things can only be hinted and still, they complain, over opinions.

History teaches us you can’t warn people, they’re stupid now as they were the first time.

1- However, this is assuming the data you need exists.

Heard of publication bias?

And what about grant application bias?

What about liberal privilege in academia?

And why would it be online, for free, no paywall or subscription service, where you can link it and any old pleb could peruse?

Why would the taxpayer need to see the fruit of their investment? Trust the experts. Why would they lie?

[And why wouldn’t a liar, lie about their sources too? Even the ones who give them don’t expect you to check.]

I try to source data for some posts but sometimes I have to say, trust me, I’ve seen it. Eventually you will too?

The reality means this is necessary for discussion’s sake. If they cared, they’d buy a textbook or pay an expert on the sly. The real 101 stuff doesn’t have a source, it’s just known.

But not by laymen. Which is a feature, where concentration of power is concerned.

This means you’re screwed. Rarely, good information slips through. They plug those leaks quickly.

Plenty of my old, good links are dead or distorted. Coincidence?

Many times, they don’t link from this site but work fine on others. We have tested this.

Freedom of thought

If you can’t say it, you can’t think it.

https://quillette.com/2018/06/10/giving-devil-due-freedom-inquiry-science-politics-inviolable/

 In 1989, the New South Wales parliament in Australia passed the Anti-Discrimination Act that includes these chilling passages, Orwellian in their implications:

The law invests in the Anti-Discrimination Board the power to* determine whether a report is ‘fair,’ and whether a discussion is ‘reasonable,’ ‘in good faith,’ and ‘in the public interest.’ The Board will pronounce upon the acceptability** of artistic expression, research papers, academic controversy, and scientific questions. An unfair (i.e., inaccurate) report of a public act may expose the reporter and the publisher to damages of up to $40,000.3

*Laws can’t change shit about reality, they have no such “power”.

**The worst kind of church.

The Left always does the same thing: pretends to be nice, gets in power, censors, punishes, intimidates, introduces freedom-killing laws and eventually shoots free-thinkers in the back of the head when re-education*** fails.

Gaslighting*** when an individual does it.

The Berkeley police finally restored order, moving the crowd out of the building and into the street, where they continued to chant, shout, and demonstrate.

“Demonstrate” civil unrest ya mean?

It isn’t a violent mob if it’s students?

Shoot them like dogs if they won’t act like humans.

Use the pellets if you aren’t hard enough for bullets. Water jets?

Since Irving’s invitation to speak came from the Berkeley Coalition for Free Speech, they apparently also no longer teach irony at that institution.

ba dum dum tssh

And given the horrific history of race relations in America such hate speech laws could be rationalized

Is that a joke?

as relevant to the claim that there are genetically-determined differences between blacks and whites

Races do exist, it’s the basis of forensics?

in intelligence, because such information (whether true or false) might lead white supremacists and other bigots to commit violence against blacks.

THE TRUTH IS NOT AN EXCUSE.

THE TRUTH IS NOT AN EXCUSE.

Because parts of science may be true but not all science is legal to discuss.

Land of the FREEEEEEEEE…..

Or, considering the long struggle women have had to gain parity to men,

still haven’t

one could argue

if one is a liar

that research on gender differences in cognitive abilities could turn back the clock on women’s rights

no?

The economy isn’t suddenly going to lose the majority of its workforce on a Maybe.

should a disparity be found in favor of the gender still dominant in positions of power.

The laws showing favour to women are based in those differences, same with race.

You cannot deny those differences while pushing for laws founded on them.

Since people act on their beliefs,

Not violently, they don’t. Unless you curtail their freedom to passively avoid.

Freedom of association keeps society peaceful.

and beliefs are expressed in the form of speech,

To be challenged.

You can’t challenge someone who isn’t talking.

isn’t it reasonable to argue that certain scientific findings be categorized as a form of hate speech that should be censored?

No.

Science describes reality.

You do not have the power to censor reality.

Nobody does.

You cannot magically raise African nations’ IQs either. This is King Canute levels of delusion.

Social engineering was a fraud. Head Start didn’t work on little white Timmy either!

Diverse or equal, you cannot claim both. First place or no winners, pick. Merit or bias?

What they really want is a visible hierarchy you are forbidden to question.

To know who rules over you….

Thankfully, the populace always outnumbers them. And more people means more brains noticing the same observations and reality.

People will notice and if you make it taboo, they’ll think about it more.

That’s how oppression works.

Angela Merkel admitted the experiment of multiculturalism failed, why can’t we discuss this?

Hate speech is a postmodern construct that won’t last the century. You cannot rule a feeling illegal. The CPS are not psychics divining feelings from the ether and it isn’t enforced equally, it’s enforced against whites and therefore, illegal by our original founding laws. “Protected groups”, the basis for the “positive” discrimination (end) of justice do not exist either because we are all equal under the law according to the true and real law. Justice is blind. And if science is to be believed, everyone is racist, so either it doesn’t count by neutralisation OR every crime, is a hate crime – that’s impossible to enforce and again, neutralises.

Stereotypes are statistically true and if social science continues to deny its un-PC findings, it will find itself de-funded, put on trial for abuse of position and on the wrong side of history.

Under the law equality is a legal construct, technically a legal fiction.

For example, the legal fiction will expect a man can run to a fire alarm until in a case one turns up to court in a wheelchair. Then the fiction dissolves, in that case. It is not kid gloves, the way it’s treated.
Being treated with dignity is something else entirely, mostly a personal decision (they mis-inform to bias) to treat someone as average, above or below (but still human) and the law cannot demand respect from one subject to another, no man can insist on being accorded honourable status without earning it.

The Honour’s List is a joke, full of preening narcissists.

The law has over-stepped its place for decades. We never needed a race relations act for millennia! If people can’t act like civilized First Worlders, should they even be here? To be tolerated in our land is their privilege, their immigrant privilege, not their right.

Even that has its conditions and that applies to say, whites in Africa.

As for Europe?

They never conquered us and we never voted for them to be nor remain here.

We refuse to worship invaders and kiss the toes of traitors.

End

Positive = Punishing children for what their fathers might’ve done. Treating natives as second-class in their rightful homeland because treating anyone as second class is what evil tyrants do.

They never enforce by class, do they? You’ll find most non-whites protected by such laws are middle-class against the working-class aka it’s social INJUSTICE.

It’s become illegal to offend the middle class.

Nobody gives a shit if Christian white van man is offended. Oh, but volunteer for the army, and you won’t get hired in the police!

The new no Irish signs.

The justification of such laws in the consequentialist argument that people might be incited to discrimination, hate, or violence if exposed to such ideas fails the moment you turn the argument around and ask:

No?

People think.

Thinking is not a crime, a thought is not violence.

Any idea that can die with the slightest criticism, should.

They have one job and people are noticing the lies.

If you won’t inform them of the truth, they’ll hate you.

Scientism: the false belief that objective reality is politically correct.

Scientism is dying, like the non-whites and women science pretends aren’t any different, and so cannot legally develop functional medication for!

[Metaphor is also not dehumanizing or all Disney films are illegal.]

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2014/06/11/immigration-or-invasion/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/11/05/why-are-terrorist-attacks-so-shocking-to-westerners/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/16/video-stage-zero-of-white-advocacy/

EXTRA EXTRA

[i’m always extra]

Tangents, get cha tangents here!

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/30/study-physiology-and-political-psychology/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/29/knowing-the-history-of-slavery-can-get-you-fired/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/29/americans-dont-know-logical-fallacies-ex-a/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/29/amygdala-and-the-fractured-ego-of-the-left/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/27/link-who-is-we-paleface/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/27/society-is-homogeneous/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/25/predictable-cuck-as-clockwork/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/19/imitating-israel/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/17/link-tolerance-isnt-a-virtue/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/17/the-indigenous-peoples-front/

Modernists love corruption

https://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2018/05/why-traditionalism-has-become.html

They deserve their suffering for this and they’ll get it in full.

The Bible is clear on this point.

Rule of the internet #43

The more beautiful and pure a thing is – the more satisfying it is to corrupt it.

The epitome of evil. Is that not Satan’s MO? Sadism?

42 Nothing is sacred.

https://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2018/05/why-does-political-correctness-lie-even.html

They live in a superficial world where words are like magic spells and make reality.

No wonder they’re obsessed with HP.

Love is love?

Then why all the divorce?

Lust is stronger than my conscience.

Wicked people, wicked ways, wicked ends.
Our horror films are about these people.

People watch adulterous media over boy meets girl.
Divorce lawyers profit.

https://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2018/05/is-now-in-west-most-evil-in-human.html

I’ve said before, we’re rotten to the core.

Many of the Biblical crimes we commit are treated with reverence.
Carousing, fornication, blasphemy. Worse than Sodom.

They wanted to corrupt the one pure guest, remember?

Evil cannot stand goodness in its midst.