Link: Leftism is universal acid

https://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/leftism-is-universal-acid.html

Leftism eats away at whatever container it is put in – whether that container be religion, science, education, the legal system, the military or whatever. All these started out carrying a small beaker of Leftism, and ended-up being dissolved into Leftism.

And Leftism really is like acid – it destroys the functionality of all social systems, reduces them to a confluent lagoon of Leftism – but does not thereby unify them….

becoming corrupted into routinely-dishonest, gibbering slogan-mongers.

SJWs Always Lie?

They don’t see it as lying. Cover-ups, twisting, defamation, all for the Greater Good of their Leftism. It’s taqiyya, basically. The truth would harm their cause, like a crusade only “Progress”…

White pill

https://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/in-our-innermost-heart-has-been-set.html

We should therefore be wary of being ‘too virtuous’ by negative avoidance of action, when this prevents us living fully; since not even trying to live is the worst thing we can do.

Why?

Want of inspiration.

Our role models are blocked from publicity. This is the real Dark Ages. We don’t know their names.

I’m sure the London crime spree has nothing to do with funding and celebration of criminals in music culture.

We have a culture of chaos.

https://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/the-genius-famine-in-arts.html

The ‘genius famine’ in art and music has been just as damaging as has the decline of genius in science and technology; and has contibuted to the alienation and demotivation characteristic of modernity.

Think of that Boomer anthem Imagine.
A song about peace ..from a wife beater.

Dwarf gold

medium.com/@Informedtrades/the-black-eagle-trust-is-there-a-hidden-financial-system-based-on-a-large-gold-treasure-f6a87cd1f4be

You don’t count BOE?

Sweden? The anal-tight cling of the Swiss? Denmark?

Deutsche bank?

I mean sure but… like it’s the only one. Think of all those “abandoned” safety deposit boxes. I bet some even date back to WW2… or the Russian Revolution. Or items from Napoleon.

The mistake

Who’s to blame?

Inspired by

My money is on Queen Victoria.

Feel free to steal the photos by the way.

Multiculturalism has ‘utterly failed’ – Angela Merkel, 2010.

Update: I deliberated whether to include this but, you know there’s really no such thing as multiculturalism? It’s pure idea. It is referenced like a deity you must appease. Think about it. Multiculturalism forbids anyone their identity, since individual identities would congregate to a cultural standard en masse. We can’t have that. Diversity, on the other hand, is the complete opposite. It is forcing the foxes into the chicken coop. Everyone has their identity, it is stable and unchanging. There are many different ones. They conflict sometimes. All the evils of the world in one place, many peoples. Multiculturalism allows only one culture: materialist “addicted to distraction” pop culture. It blurs and prevents expression or personal liberty, authenticity. However, humans have a legal right to their identity (race, sex, cultural heritage) so multiculturalism is impossible. There is no way to make it practical. It isn’t even a theory because a theory needs consistency. Postmodernism has no concrete theories. This plus another thing is the best it can do, there is no foresight, hindsight or deeper agency or reasoning. There is certainly no critical thinking.

What multiculturalism? Where? All we see is compulsory diversity, totally different.

Suppressing the people’s identities for a Guardian reader’s vision of “polite society” is causing most of the social unrest. It makes them feelgood, cue another revolution…

The materialism mentioned can only be supported by wide debt enslavement. The good times are over, we’re running on the fumes of fumes. This is how Empires die. The socialism rewards those who socially conform (or people without jobs couldn’t afford the goodies and they’d riot out of envy). Equal in misery, equal in poverty.

The poverty of culture is the tragic loss. We had so much and let idiots throw it away.

The most rebellious thing you could do is express your heritage.

“The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.” Camus

When did British morality die?

The recent interest in the Eisenstadt v. Baird case

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/405/438/case.html

might make it look like I’m picking on the Yanks. OK, I was, but I can also pinpoint a moment we were morally doomed too.

1977.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/45

Subsection (1) above shall not affect the offence of conspiracy at common law if and in so far as it may be committed by entering into an agreement to engage in conduct which—

(a)tends to corrupt public morals or outrages public decency; but

(b)would not amount to or involve the commission of an offence if carried out by a single person otherwise than in pursuance of an agreement.

Anything “consensual” goes, quite a powerful label.

We could technically make online porn illegal over night, since it’s cinematographic and children frequently view it, which is not only grooming but corrupting.

(3)In section 2 of that Act after subsection (4) there shall be inserted the following subsection:—

(4A)Without prejudice to subsection (4) above, a person shall not be proceeded against for an offence at common law—

(a)in respect of a cinematograph exhibition or anything said or done in the course of a cinematograph exhibition, where it is of the essence of the common law offence that the exhibition or, as the case may be, what was said or done was obscene, indecent, offensive, disgusting or injurious to morality; or

(b)in respect of an agreement to give a cinematograph exhibition or to cause anything to be said or done in the course of such an exhibition where the common law offence consists of conspiring to corrupt public morals or to do any act contrary to public morals or decency.

(4)At the end of section 2 of that Act there shall be added the following subsection:—

(7)In this section ” cinematograph exhibition ” means an exhibition of moving pictures produced on a screen by means which include the projection of light.

(5)In section 3 of that Act (which among other things makes provision for the forfeiture of obscene articles kept for publication for gain) at the beginning of subsection (3) there shall be inserted the words

Subject to subsection (3A) of this sectionand at the end of that subsection there shall be inserted the following subsection:—

(3A)Without prejudice to the duty of a court to make an order for the forfeiture of an article where section 1(4) of the Obscene Publications Act 1964 applies (orders made on conviction), in a case where by virtue of subsection (3A) of section 2 of this Act proceedings under the said section 2 for having an article for publication for gain could not be instituted except by or with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions, no order for the forfeiture of the article shall be made under this section unless the warrant under which the article was seized was issued on an information laid by or on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions.

Wonder why nobody wants to see plays anymore?

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/54

Abolition of censorship of the theatre

1Abolition of censorship of the theatre.

(1)The M1Theatres Act 1843 is hereby repealed; and none of the powers which were exercisable thereunder by the Lord Chamberlain of Her Majesty’s Household shall be exercisable by or on behalf of Her Majesty by virtue of Her royal prerogative.

(2)[F1In granting, renewing or transferring any licence under this Act for the use of any premises for the public performance of plays or in varying any of the terms, conditions or restrictions on or subject to which any such licence is held, the licensing authority shall not have power to impose any term, condition or restriction as to the nature of the plays which may be performed under the licence or as to the manner of performing plays thereunder:

Provided that nothing in this subsection shall prevent a licensing authority from imposing any term, condition or restriction which they consider necessary in the interests of physical safety or health or any condition regulating or prohibiting the giving of an exhibition, demonstration or performance of hypnotism within the meaning of the M2Hypnotism Act 1952.]

Health and Safety overtook the concern for public morality.
That’s why actors can get naked and perform sexual acts in a play.

There’s our own Race Relations statute (we never used to need one….) and hate speech was only written in once the original protection of the natives, White Christians, was written out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Justice_and_Immigration_Act_2008#Blasphemy

That is the year we officially became second class citizens in our own country.
It just so happens to be around the time left-wing batshittery became intolerable.

US rentseeking and corruption

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-05/protectionism-vs-corruption-which-worse-economy

hmm did not know nice surprised hot

S’good.

And we all know which wing the rentseekers tend to be on.
They aren’t anybody’s friend unless they can make money off it.

Fine if it’s some LBGTIDGAF, but children? Mental health? Those are the preserve of conservatives.

The inequality the Left complain of is greatly caused by the cascade of their rentseeking ‘charities’ (where they happen to pay themselves, because they’re so selfless).

7 issues with the modern academia calling itself Science

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/14/12016710/science-challeges-research-funding-peer-review-process

science is a process, not a system of employ

why confused what wtf

why do they keep acting as if the power structure is the only science?

Newton self-published and Tesla went to VCs, screw them

Note: no mention of political bias.

Uhuh. O.K.

Video: How forced adoption (kidnapping) by Social Services works in the UK

You may have heard a while back about the Italian woman knocked out, given a C-section and having had her child kidnapped.
Italians were rightly outraged. This is part of a process called a forced adoption.
It seems this is a much bigger problem than I’d thought. The people who allowed Rotherham among many other unreported cases to happen, and since MW is covering Rotherham abuses of power extensively, I decided to look into their operations. It is chilling and disturbing viewing.

Secret courts. That’s how this happens.
Watch the whole thing, listen to the teenage boy assert his human rights and be pinned down painfully by adult men, handcuffed despite committing no crime and screaming. Tell me there’s nothing wrong with the system.
The targets exist, brought in under Blair, yet I have seen them deny this elsewhere despite evidence. Who sets them and why doesn’t matter, fact is they get paid to traffic children and this acts as incentive for corruption.

Notice the way the social worker (they’re all SJWs and simply get pushed to another council when caught out) smiles when she says about the extreme of taking children for no good reason.
Here, in the first minute of secret filming, they admit to leaving children homeless out in the cold to sleep on a park bench.

A judge himself admits people could be forgiven for thinking the family courts (secret courts) are “neither compassionate nor humane”.
researchingreform.net/2016/01/22/president-says-family-courts-are-neither-compassionate-nor-humane/

“Maggie Mellon who is the Deputy Chair of the British Association of Social Workers said:
(https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/9-family-debate-transcript.pdf)
“The policy imperative towards more and quicker forced adoption means we may well look back at this period in horror as we do now to the forcible removal of thousands of children to Australia in the 1930s, forties and fifties without their parents’ knowledge and consent. That was done because it was felt it was the right thing but now we think how on earth could we possibly have done that?””

Already covering themselves as the victims under We Didn’t Know! As they write the reports to make it happen.

They don’t like to be filmed because it makes perjury harder.
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jun/17/social-workers-under-scrutiny-parents-camera

Technically, supposedly, they cannot commit perjury, as there is no jury in these secret courts and they aren’t lying in public to the judge.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/social_workers_who_commit_perjur
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3230391/Mother-wins-newborn-son-social-workers-disliked-outset-took-away-three-hours-old.html

“Information presented was at best mistaken and at worst complete fabrication.’
Sheriff McFarlane also said that an unnamed social worker may have committed perjury.”

http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2015/04/22/social-worker-recorded-false-supervision-record-forged-supervisees-signature/

Note: The entryism and punishment for critical thought for the honest people who try to take up the career. They are routinely denied promotion or fired for refusing to acquiescence to their superior’s demands, regardless of the child’s best interests. “Risk of harm” is as reliable as a horoscope, guesswork wide open to deception, there is a risk of harm to anyone walking in a public street, day or night. Must we adults be locked up for our own safety? The Court of Protection even confines the elderly, by calling them a danger to themselves (strangely, they get control of the elder’s finances, which I’m sure presents no motive).
http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2014/05/27/social-worker-suspended-register-undermining-child-protection-order-application/

No less evidence presented than to Parliament itself, those in charge are fully aware of this and do nothing.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmeduc/writev/1514/cp17.htm

“I have several judgements showing the building of fake evidence at a ridiculous level without even any care for making this fake evidence looking true. It is brutal to say this but social workers perjury, administration cover-up and mock trials are dominating family courts. No wonder why they don’t want the press to see this. In COA I have seen a judge who is now in the House of Lords justifying to a father the removal of his son that way : You show that you could probably be a good father but you will raise your son in the dislike of the professionals (social workers) involved in your life.”

How can the failure to act be explained?
Well, there are plenty of allegations of elite pedophile rings in the UK and this would make powerful people easy to blackmail and control.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34442292

It begs the question: Where do they get these children?