Post-war population recovery genes

Men are literally replaceable and that makes them better as a sex.

Exhibit A in the scientific “Men ain’t shit” series.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081211121835.htm

In many of the countries that fought in the World Wars, there was a sudden increase in the number of boys born afterwards. The year after World War I ended, an extra two boys were born for every 100 girls in the UK, compared to the year before the war started. The gene, which Mr Gellatly has described in his research, could explain why this happened.

As the odds were in favour of men with more sons seeing a son return from the war, those sons were more likely to father boys themselves because they inherited that tendency from their fathers. In contrast, men with more daughters may have lost their only sons in the war and those sons would have been more likely to father girls. This would explain why the men that survived the war were more likely to have male children, which resulted in the boy-baby boom.

In most countries, for as long as records have been kept, more boys than girls have been born. In the UK and US, for example, there are currently about 105 males born for every 100 females.

It is well-documented that more males die in childhood and before they are old enough to have children.

That is prior to competition, crime, psychiatric issues including self-loathing and desire to never reproduce, as well as the sexual selection of women for a suitable man.

Externalities like the economy, racial wars, anti-natal culture notwithstanding.

The female genome is more stable, two Xs will do that. It contains more data too, the Y is smaller.

Women must be more stable biologically as the (genetic) carrier sex, another reason against female drafting. If some men die, they clearly recover (and as proven here, come back better) but when a race loses its women, it goes extinct.

So in the same way that the gene may cause more boys to be born after wars, it may also cause more boys to be born each year.

The fitter male lines are self-replacing.  This is why all adult men should have been drafted. The reward of winning a war should be reproducing into your society’s future, to reward the cowards who remained behind is an insult to the brave K-types of the sex.

This is the red-pill. Men evolved to be expendable to one another in the protection of their shared racial germline.

Cowards know they’re cannon fodder. They betray their fellow man (intra-racial Brotherhood is the only acceptable collectivism). It reminds me of the Little Red Hen, and what man would want a coward in their ranks, that’s treason waiting to happen?

Or as we call them, cucks.

Behold, the back-up genetic programme: the self-culling cannon fodder.
Remarkable that genetic dead-ends appreciate the importance of marriage enough to insult all married couples as inferior (rationalization).

Also, demographic decline virtue signalling (- you can’t out-breed Asia, war is inevitable).

Asia*: highest population density, territorial expansive, fastest growing religion (Islam).

Inevitable.

Trump could shit gold and it’s still inevitable.

Why?

More than r-selection, perhaps a feature of it.

If you’re stupid like Asians and murder your girls (glaring at India and China) then you cull the female-preferred genes among men, slowly killing your racial future because there won’t be enough carrier women to go around and the ‘problem’ will only get worse. There is no culling effect equivalent to war in women except socialist policy.

There’s your ‘war against women’. Affirmative Action for unfit male genes collapses both their group and the fit men of their race who were weak enough to allow it to happen. If every man is entitled to 1 waifu thanks to socialist compulsion (and all men, all women forced to marry by law**) but five infant boys survive due to medical technology…. 100-105=-5

Socialism’s birth policies are as dysgenic as their economics that punish effort.
This is why men shouldn’t decide who gets to breed with laws, women evolved for that task.

Socialism cannot replace sexual selection. What the internet considers it is not, reproduction is required.

A war will be mandatory if the leftover men have any hope of reproduction, by conquest and rape  …..and ‘immigration’. The neocolonialism as BPS explained, of buying up properties in another homeland (r-migration for resources).

*As previously covered, most money to purchase is loaned by the Chinese Communist government. They are the true buyers overseas. Ban foreigners from literally buying your country. It’s a matter of national security. That includes the Putin-banished Russians’ blood money in London keeping the gasping death rattle of a real estate bubble alive. I’d extend this to the compulsory purchase of properties made by shell corps overseas, with unexplained funds (anti-corruption law) or belonging to dual passport holders who refuse to drop the other one (loyalty to another nation).

The concrete used in protected property basements is doomed to collapse. Like the postmodern glass monstrosities, they all crumble eventually, that’s why huge basements aren’t built in English soil. Rainy, flood-prone soil. Next to the biggest river incoming to the landmass.

And we get frequent earthquakes, of the sort that causes cracks in… concrete.

It’s a capital city so traffic causes tremors too – including planes.

Every heinous skyscraper you ever see will be self-destructing. Rich tower or council estate.

https://www.cement.org/docs/default-source/fc_concrete_technology/durability/is536-types-and-causes-of-concrete-deterioration.pdf

I’m literally the first person to look this up. Engineers study ENTROPY.

This error is old as Babel. We don’t need to lift a finger, ugly postmodern structures are already crumbling.

They’ll go the way of wooden castles.

Shad viewers? Anyone?

If only the Nazis had simply purchased American land, we’d be speaking German.

They’re still going to shoot you by the way. They need to outnumber you, fill University places then government positions first. If they have the land, all that’s needed are executions.

**Reducing citizens to breeding sows for the government, thanks, socialism!

Socialism is hence r-select and among other issues, assumes all men can be provider husbands, all women are fertile and all citizens are heterosexual. Socialism is doomed to fail by virtue of mathematics and basic biology.

Rabbits are cowards

https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2018/06/portland_police_revoke_permit.html

Throwing a water bottle when their knives are confiscated.

Have you ever been so scared of being punched?

Here’s a little Bible

Take heed therefore how ye hear: for whosoever hath, to him shall be given; and whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken even that which he seemeth to have.

The male c-word: CUCK

I’ve been waiting to do this post for a while. Biding my time. OK, let’s go.Even better, give them a pitying look and smirk no matter what they say.

Heavy on meme. Short on brain.

shitposthistory

arcuck

It isn’t the fetish. It refers to a brand of traitorous self-proclaimed conservatives that don’t even talk the talk. A milquetoast inefficiency born of fear of disapproval. An ideological traitor but fence-sitter and desperate people-pleaser. They will betray their ingroup to please the outgroup that will never accept them, and they know this.

A peculiar kind of betrayal charaterised by ingroup loathing, as opposed to self-loathing. In fact, all they care for is reputation, being densely narcissistic.

Cuckservatism: Seeking approval from other (usually liberal) men like they’re your wife.

Example? Exhibit A:

cuckproof

cuckchicken

Yes, that’s the reason. Some of you may remember my use of this meme.

It has nothing to do with the paraphilia, it’s the sound a chicken makes.

It’s the male c-word because it attacks the inconsolable male weakness: cowardice.
This is intentional. It precisely targets their masculinity, since they push androgyny.
It points out their non-traditional sexual practices, for mockery. As manwhores.
This is intentional.
Obviously I knew this but I question how many others do?
Technically, the first man I called a cuck was Roosh. I don’t think he got it.

It’s psyops. It attacks their lifestyle.

By comparison, ‘cunt’ attacks the source of femininity and female power. It doesn’t really work unless you hate women. What’s so bad about having one? Men go into debt to rent one.
Everyone hates a skeeze and a traitor. They don’t care for truth but for selfish profit. They signal altruism but sell your future down the river, counting your shekels.

carrlthecuck

cuckecheese cuckfb cuckglenn cuckhappen

It relies on a tropism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_faith#Psychology

“While self-deception may be a tropism, not consciously done, it may be guided by “projects” one may set for one’s life, such as a desire for personal pleasure, wealth, power, or to get into heaven”

cuckles cuckonme

‘a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’

cuckreddit

We’ve been cucking for political parties for years, I simply pointed it out.
Fetish secondary definition: Voting for them while they screw us.

cucktales cucktrump everyoneisacuck

nowisnotthetime

wordofday

altrightrobot

To be perfectly frank, I’m surprised it spread this far.
I just thought the chicken anime thing was funny.

I suppose it demonstrates the finer principles of ‘why mockery?’ I discussed.
The truth won’t get a cuck’s attention. All they care about is reputation. Tell the truth about that, and he’ll listen to you. We keep using insults in circulation because they work.

I never thought pigs were the appropriate metaphor for bad men. Chickens.
Bland and annoying.

Well, there we are.

Finally.

Bonus question: in the original yodel video, it sounds like he’s saying another meme.
Which one could it be?

weareallshitpostershere

I recently became a meme so I’m trying to restore my meme karma.

Encouraging men to be criminals isn’t ‘alpha’

This is the stupidest Alpha posturing post I have ever seen.

http://alphagameplan.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/live-bold.html

The manosphere makes the simple error of availability bias: they base all of their advice on an entire sex, which exists worldwide with as much variance as men, around the narrowest of demographic bands: white American sluts with nothing better to do than hang out at bars (alcoholics).

You can spit in a girl’s face and she will still be attracted to you. You can call her terrible vulgar names and she will still be attracted to you. You can even beat her up repeatedly and she will still be attracted to you.

Do you want to attract borderlines? Because that’s how you attract borderlines.

Women aren’t crazy, the ones attracted to you are.
Once you hit double, triple digits of failed affairs, the problem isn’t the women, the common denominator of failed relationships is you. Dodging responsibility is such a feminist move e.g. women shouldn’t carry weapons to defend themselves, why are women being attacked?

Do you blame the people giving you this advice? No. You know they’re trashy when you got involved and you liked it. You don’t get to change your mind at the end and pretend you were taken in. The PUA-types like Bad Girls and want a Good Girl’s Happy Ending. It’s deluded as the career woman thinking she can pick up a man at 30 like dry cleaning.

No wonder these guys get hauled in front of the courts on assault charges and rape accusations, they 100% deserve it if this is the nonsense they internalize. Then play Victim like the bitchy gamma they secretly are. If confronted by such a woman’s brothers, uncles or father, they’d shriek like a banshee, we all know it. This macho posturing is now opening up the door to incitement, since when is attacking women a show of strength? I covered the reddit abusers trying to justify their crminal actions as redpill (using it as a shield, little cowards) when actually redpill theory is essentialism, traditonalism, that treats the weaker sex with respect because they don’t have to prove anything to anyone (this is all homoerotic posturing to other, decent men, who are naturally disgusted). It gets worse.

You can be a complete psychopath, murder your parents, or tattoo a swastika into your forehead, and more than a few women will actually find that attractive.

Kevin-Hart-Really-o rlly lies

All it takes is one sperg to believe you. These are the ones saying SlutHate are deluded for thinking women value looks (lookism). Hybristophilia is a fetish. It occurs in men too. That’s like say all men are trannies, and secretly want dresses, because a few men like to wear little girl dresses and feel a desire to self-castrate. It’s so damn wrong I don’t believe I have to point this out, what are you all thinking? You don’t know the female mind better than us. We don’t know yours better than you. Quit playing Professor Xavier and gaslighting already vulnerable mentally ill women into fitting your delusions on the entire sex (the ‘You Really Wanted It’ line is used by rapists btw, that won’t look good in court). You can make a vulnerable person believe anything (see white female Islam converts for a fitting example), but that doesn’t make it true.

The signalling to other men re violence should involve violence toward other men.
If someone challenges you to a fight in a bar, you don’t punch his girlfriend, what the hell is wrong with you? What happened to the manosphere (my guess, keyboard alpha entryism) to make this signalling reach the mass hysterical point where saying this is not only OK but met with praise?

I just.... I don't even know what to....what??

You have criminal responsibility and moral agency, you’re old enough to know better. So many people reading this are 25+, well beyond the age total ignorance is acceptable. Weren’t these guys saying we should hold men to a higher moral standard because they need to lead women? And to do it all to impress some slut? What sort of pedestal BS is that? No bitch is worth prison!

Have you actually seen Dark Triad people IRL? I don’t mean streaming Dexter on Netflix and feeling witty or reviving a videotape of American Psycho or Fight Club. Actual psychopaths and sociopaths? Have you seen what their life outcomes are and what happens once they’re past their prime (35+) and people stop putting up with their abusive nonsense and giving them 12th chances? When they’re held to an adult standard?

Read Hare’s accounts of psychopaths and read how bitchy and depressed they are and you will know pretty damn quickly these are people nobody should emulate. They hate themselves and their own lives and punish others out of envy.

You know what happens to them?

Dead or prison-raped, in general.

What marvellous advice for modern men already getting that Men Are Evil propaganda from the feminists, thanks for the show of faith in boys. That’s exactly what they want you to do, so much so I suspect this may be a black ops coup of the Narrative.

It leads me to believe the manosphere bought into black gang culture and genuinely believe criminals are glamorous, as opposed to the truth, where they’re as low as junkies and nobody shows them respect.

Going by this, any man showing deference to any woman socially (called manners and etiquette, boors) is a ‘pussy.’ Considering the type always slinging that insult (themselves losers), who cares what those manboys think? That’s the general attitude of every great man I’ve ever met.

‘Oh, you call me a pussy. Am I supposed to care?’ 

If you can be moved around like a little pawn by a word, you’re no better than the SJWs. If calling you chicken like Marty McFly will make you kill yourself, you aren’t brave, you’re terminally stupid.
Sticks and stones, bitches! Don’t react to a few non-applicable terms like they’re a punch in the face or an insult to your manhood.

If all you care about is counting notches, you don’t have any honour to speak of and everyone knows it.

This is meant to be an evopsych argument (women are programmed to like this – in the State of Nature, not the 21st century, numbnuts) but all the evidence points to Types. Plural. As in, different people evolved to like different things. Human taste is irreducible to a single demo, like sex. In basic studies on body type, a simple measure, computerized, we can agree it’s empirical, men thought women like Muscle Man. Huge, hulking, high maintenance. To this day, men dare disagree with the findings, as if women don’t know what sexually appeals to them, as if you can gaslight an entire sex into finding what you have sexually attractive (an anti-evolution position), just like the fat acceptance feminists (‘tingles’ is also an inaccurate term, the brain codes for attraction, a physiological response isn’t vital/instant as it is with men, it’s projection for the weakness of their own body betraying their interests, like we care), and they go on to insist that their bulking of gainzzzz is actually about women, instead of signalling social desirability as a tribal member to other men (the homoeroticism upsets them). Watch the way they compliment each other at the gym. Watch them. Hella gay.

Notes

Spitting in someone’s face is illegal. It’s assault. It’s considered worse than, say, a punch, because it transmits disease. Sometimes ranked up to battery without actual contamination. It’s a filthy thing nobody in the First World should be forgiven for doing. Live in the Middle East, they do it all the time. Considering it’s usually done by men to women too weak to throw a punch, this would be an aggravating factor for sentencing as an act of misogyny, don’t take cues from porn, addicts. They’re paid to pretend they like bodily fluids.

Lynsey [1995] is the case law relevant to the UK.

Doing things because a girl wants you to is beta.

Changing everything about your life around what you think women think is omega.

Changing your actions because of what people might think of you isn’t manly.

Being a cad used to have a social cache because it was difficult and could get you run out of town or worse. Nowadays anyone can get laid if they drop their standards enough. The glory has gone. You go to the nearest American city and buy a cougar a drink at 2am. Casanova you ain’t.

This isn’t school, who cares about being cool anymore?

Anti-socials don’t have good social relations. Duh?

‘And it doesn’t matter if you try to conceal your cowardice by calling it “being a gentleman”‘ – Not the words of traditional men in support of a Patriarchy, where all the men are forced to be gents. When they say they support such things, it is a lie and again, signalling, because men who truly believe that wouldn’t treat their peers with open disdain.

Compare with: http://alphagameplan.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/when-gamma-reacts.html

“He is a coward and will abandon most everything to save his skin, and this fact gnaws on him internally. Being so narcissistic he is unable to imagine other people not being secret cowards so he will regularly talk of being brave and accuse others of being cowardly.”

They have jumped the shark.

red dwarf ace rimmer interior alligator surfing

Return of Cucks burrowing

rooshv.com/how-to-securely-communicate-and-meet-with-thought-criminals

What do you expect?
Running and hiding, You haven’t seen the last of us! fist-shaking.

I was kidding about the No Girls Allowed! crayon sign on a treehouse idea. From what he said, I could track him. Look into InfoSec, seriously dudes.

Let me guess what the tone of their world-changing dialogue will be.

You’re not oppressed, you’re unpopular. Like the SJWs, who themselves are experiencing a massive backlash from neutral observers. This is K-shift. It isn’t because you’re men or your race, although blaming those things imply they are controlling your behaviour directly, an argument of loss of agency, so well done on being stupid theoretically too.

That’s so Tolkien, to bring up the namesake. You know, the bloke who was as racially switched on as Hitler.
To this day, Vox Day calls the unwanted European sex tourists ‘Orcs’.

Go right ahead and meet up in secret, what a wonderful way to change the very public Narrative, your male logic is immensely superior because revolution involves meeting up in somebody’s basement and being afraid to stand out. Tumblr SJWs have more balls than that. Especially when transgender. They stand out en masse as a defensive tactic, but this option doesn’t appeal.
Trust the materialistic power-hungry brown man (who fled his own country in shame) is going to lead you into the prosperity of the very White and very Christian 1950s. In America.

If only Europe had a Roosh V for itself. But I guess we sort of do since he refuses to fucking leave, my conscience is clear, stay as long as you like, see what happens. But white women are the problem, folks. All those damn white women, living in their native homeland to stay among their own and refusing to abandon their patriotic post.

I think we’re done here.

Return of Kings, home of covert narcissists

Based purely on the three or four posts I read today seeing if the writing quality had improved, back to its former glory. It’s worse, give up. The narcs took it over.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/communication-success/201601/7-signs-covert-introvert-narcissist

  1. quiet smugness
  2. selfish
  3. apathy/anti-social
  4. passive-aggressive
  5. highly sensitive
  6. special (above others)
  7. bad relationship history

Instead of pointing out how these match up, I’m gonna do my usual barb thing. Have fun.

rok1

Men should stick to carrying us, paying for stuff and dying in battle. Oh wait, that’s heartless.

rok2

I am alpha yet I become alpha because alpha is important and requires no burden of duty whatsoever. I am Galt. …Status signalling for men with too much sense to become feminists yet dumb enough to believe there’s an easy fix (blame women). And they think this will attract women, proud of their views but not enough balls to use their real name, just in case. It doesn’t.

rok3

Unlike all the whining on the internet bitter men do nowadays. Muh alimony, muh child support, muh divorce rates, muh male suicides, pity me, pity me, so I can bitch about you like a schoolgirl and you will take it because I hold Victim Card. If women are children, why do we need to support ourselves? Pay for all of us forever please.

rok4

Cut off everyone who slightly disagrees with you, #1 on Signs You’re In a Cult.

rok5

Paranoia is back in fashion. Chicks dig that 1000 yard stare.
Emotionally blackmailing and strong-arming an intimate relationship your entire life? What abuse? Why did that bitch leave me? It must be ‘hypergamy’, Boogeyman of insecurely-attached men everywhere, cos I sure as shit have no explanation for this; I am an innocent little flower who did nothing to contribute to the problem of our marriage failure.

rok6

I’m gonna walk away from my problems with a totally blank/fake expression cos that isn’t weird or pathetic. That will solve my problems and people will respect me as a macho man. They didn’t bother me, they just got me in the feels deep down but that isn’t the same as ‘pissing me off’.

rok7

Based on an article on #WasteHisTime, not ONCE do they mention it was a mocking response to #WasteHerTime, and they were actually gonna do it. Because they believed they were entitled to sex…. Nobody wants to marry Chad, the Cheat.

rok8

r-types: RUNNING AWAY IS BRAVE ITS THE BRAVEST THING EVA OMG SO ALPHA.

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

It’s the most clear-cut example of their psychology I’ve yet come across.

They’re all trying so hard to be Dark Triad. If they really met a sociopath they’d piss themselves.

Easiest way to make me downgrade your intellect.

Politeness conventions arose from honour culture, which arose from a simple fact: You never know who you’re really dealing with, until it’s too late. Considering urban anonymity this is more true than ever. You never know who you’re pissing off. As we were told, you never know who’s secretly a serial killer. This includes women.

To re-post; this is how they actually think;

…so Psychopaths will get very angry but they’ll stay angry. …I said when I get mad, I don’t show it to anybody. I said I could be furious at you and you’d never know. I show no anger whatsoever. I don’t show anxiety. I said first of all, you’ll never know. I can sit on it for a year or two or three or five.But I’ll get you. And I always do. And they don’t know where it’s coming from. They can’t tie it to the event and it (seemingly) comes out of nowhere….

In other words, they seem normal (to evade detection) and nice (to manipulate). The opposite of what these posers believe.

In other news, the same male who posted this:

“The Men’s Rights Movement Is Dead”

Posted this:

“Is It Time To Make A Truce With Men’s Rights Activists?”

Remember, rabbits have no genuine opinions, nothing set or rigid, they are popularity-seeking weathervanes, and above all, hate conflict. 

What we need now, politically, is more touchy feeling coming together kumbaya bullshit, more moderates, a leftward drift in morality, more peace and goodwill and less badfeels nasty words online.

It's encouraged to mock them as long as you're a living example of the practices you espouse.

The manosphere wonders why it is dying amidst this weak negativity.

Hubris is the modern plague.

Self-hating whites and the leftist cowardice

http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/adam-kotsko-why-white-professors.html

I generally agree with this analysis, but you have to bear in mind – even in times of war, these people would not fight. Either they run, snitch, turncoat or lay down and die, begging and crying the whole time. So when they argue all the things they supposedly believe in, ask them how far they’d go. I bet you they’d blanch and say that dying for what you believe in is “ridiculous” or old-fashioned.

Coward is hence, one of the best insults against r-types, it reminds the other r-types they cannot trust one another when times get tough. And they cannot disprove you because they know it is true. They are ultimately selfish, and would kill their own family to save themselves, if presented with the choice. Loyalty is a meaningless word.

They are not the productive, useful type of whites who would be spared – in slavery, for sex or for work. They think it’s inevitable that the white race is doomed in Europe and parts of the West, but we generally haven’t fought back yet. If/When this occurs, we must remember the rot within. Cut out the cancer. Depose these scumbags from power.

They refute agency and responsibility, little more than children. This is especially poignant among Whites due to pathological altruist strains, I believe CH covered this recently. Ideally, they should never be treated as adults, we should test everyone as a rite of passage and refuse these people adult rights until they grow a spine.