Literal psychopaths

Misogyny is a known trait in this type. If God is dead, this type of person killed Him.

The murderer lied about being her “boyfriend” too, these people belong in asylums.

We really do live in Satan’s realm.

Like, the murderer actually thought having any kind of vaguely sexual claim to her would make decapitation more okay. The idea that learning some cheap lines would ‘save’ such monsters is baseless and asking for the insanity to be turned on the silly men offering non-solutions.

Ironically, they complain about pretty women existing (online or just anyway) and then never question their own complicity in seeking them out. The degeneracy is an exchange – you perving over women for hours a day is on you. That is a choice. If ‘thots’ exist, it is only because you feed them.

Assuming there’s something evil about a woman for basically not being fat i.e. attractive, is utterly ridiculous. The atheist contempt for nature’s beauty continues. They actually think porn is real and women are like that. How long until this is connected to porn?

Tranny sex offender tried sneaking into school

Repeat Sexual Offender Arrested After Dressing Like Woman to Sneak Into School: Geoffrey Kelley

Ballygawley, County Tyrone, UK – A man convicted of three previous sexual offenses has been arrested after he was accused of donning a wig and women’s clothing to enter a local school.

Police accuse Geoffrey Rainey Kelly, aged 35, of putting on a white skirt, pink jacket, pearl necklace and blonde wig, and gaining entry to St Ciaran’s College through a side door.

Not premeditated at all.

School staff say they caught Mr Kelley wandering the halls and attempting to turn the handle on various doors.

When confronted by staff, the man claimed to be searching for a particular third-year female pupil, and gave staff the name. Staff could not find a child listed with the name on the school register, and questioned him further.

Lying.

And what if they had such a kid? Let that thing in a room with them?

Mr Kelly then stated that he was “just looking around.”

It would make sense if most misogynists (sexual predator kind) just pretended to be trannies to attack women in gym showers. It would make sense.

He left the school and drove away in a vehicle, and was later arrested by police at Ballygawley Park and Ride, still wearing the clothing described by St Ciaran’s staff.

Declaring Mr Kelley at high risk of re-offending and noncompliance with bail conditions, Judge Mark McGarrity denied him bail, noting that he had violated a Sexual Offences Prevention Order that bans him from coming within 20 meters of schools and other places frequented by minors under age 18.

like only minors should be protected?

Mr Kelly has prior convictions for sexual assaulting female individuals in 2016 and 2017, and a 2017 conviction for entering a clothing store and emerging from the changing room fully naked in front of a 16-year-old girl who was employed there.

Rehabilitation is impossible when they enjoy offending, literally.

The cure for pedophilia is lead.

also here

Sex offender caught wandering school dressed as woman

Also, library drag freak a convicted pedophile.

“Drag Queen Storytime” Reader at Houston Library a Convicted Paedophile: Albert Garza

Pedos don’t dress up like the big bad wolf anymore, but a hooker.

Old man angry he made a stupid investment

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/millennials-stop-banging-on-about-your-box-set-bore-athons-and-g/

It’s just so wrong.

Multiculturalism has killed clubbing. White women don’t want to go to a dark place full of white fever fetishists who are so uncivilized they think they can ignore the word ‘No’. If you’re harassed or assaulted by a savage, YOU might get arrested for being a white woman and rejecting them/reporting them. One of their first tactics is to accuse you of “racism” so …yeah. They’re that entitled and creepy. You can try to deny this but women vote with their feet.

We’re using what little freedom of association we still have to white flight out of a scene which PRESUMES you wanted to be attacked.

If no isn’t respected as an option, we nope out of there. Men get attacked by foreigners too.
The low IQ do not know the rules or feel exempt and nag and nag and have all sorts of ‘tricks’ they think are acceptable to get in your way. They think white women are whores and clubs are the brothel. They ask to “borrow” money from white men, like, everybody’s avoiding the Rotherham types.

Being targeted for our race and sex is racist but the police are ‘diverse’ and probably related to them.

We don’t drink there (it’s also a date rape drug, good luck getting a jury to listen to you), we don’t like the music and you can’t have a conversation. Then there’s the middle-age guys acting like an abusive stepdad, trying to get you drunk purely to rape you – who pretend it isn’t rape*, they just want you nice and weak… Let’s line up to be felt up by aged Peter Pans!

Yay, let’s spend hundreds like the stupid American rappers buying bottle service!

This is an IQ test.

Private parties and member’s clubs are thriving because it’s basically allowed to be natives only.

Genophilia is a human impulse and right, genocide involves not allowing an assembly of a group with its own kind.

The Race Relations Act killed London. We have freedom of association in public and clubs, for example, are not public. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_Relations_Act_1965

If we could all legally consent to avoid the anti-white predators, clubs would be more popular than ever.

“which extended the legislation’s remit to cover employment and housing”

The acts of statute are invalid because the native’s natural right to freedom of association and property rights are inviolate.

According to this, you don’t actually own your company or house. The government has taken the right of ownership to tell you who you must include.. but the Garrick still excludes women, this is just a race thing.

The thing they claim doesn’t exist.

We’d go to pubs if the Muslims stopped getting them closed. Why is there social housing in London? Why are taxpayers forced to commute in?

*If they don’t want you sober, they don’t want you. That isn’t courtship, it’s predation.

Being female online

This is not flirting.

I have to clarify.

Thankfully, this woman explains some of the posts and what’s wrong with them.

Flirting is consensual and not …. whatever pushy sexual weirdness this is.

I get the: “Why aren’t there more normal women online?”

Just having anything basic, you’ll bump into these creeps.

Creeps ruin the internet for everyone.

It isn’t worth it.

No woman wants to be treated like this.

Disney is piss-easy to analyse

That’s why children love it. And I don’t even have to make you sit through a lecture.

e.g.

This also explains non-Western maligned figures such as Kaali, scary mother who’d go to war for her children.

A coward would’ve seen the dragon, the power of women, and run away. He’d forever think of women as only Lilith – pure evil, because he was trying to trespass where he didn’t belong (as an unworthy suitor).

For a modern example, picture the ghetto scum who shout pornographic things at women and act surprised when they’re told to fuck off. They set the crude tone.

Every man alive knows the difference between saying “nice dress” and “nice tits”. They both mean the same thing, it’s a question of showing respect. If you don’t respect WHOEVER you speak to, why should they show respect to you?

It isn’t actually a compliment, to other men they don’t say ‘sexy’, they say “you look good”, they imply virtue. They give respect.

It reminds me of “give him a chance” …why? You date him if you want, women are not a lottery.

It’s bullshit when women say it about their fat friend and it’s dangerous when men say it about creeps. Men don’t have female creepdar.

I despise fake femininity because it suppresses the wrathful impulse to punish wrongdoing and protect the good. That side always comes out eventually. If it isn’t protective, it can turn abusive much like false masculinity’s aggression, made from buried passivity and resentment.

Misogynists see the wrathful side of every woman because the women sense it and are correctly punishing their misogyny. You are not entitled to kind treatment, it is earned. If you treat women like shit, don’t expect women to act like that’s acceptable. Men set societal standards in morality but women have the task to enforce them.

Feminism just thought it could fuck with evolutionary formula  because men dropped the standards for themselves and men changed the rules to evade paternal responsibilities (now the taxpaying man funds the deadbeat male).

Don’t you feel free, being cucked?

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/nov/30/free-love-polyamory-modern-couples

For once, the comment section has sufficient experience to call bullshit.

Vapid men, vapid sexuality. What do you expect? Literal commitment-phobes.

If Holmes had been married/divorced as often as Musk (5 including the secret divorce), there’d be tons of memes and comparisons to Elizabeth Taylor and how sad it is they ‘can’t hold down a man.’ At least hold men to a standard? Any standard!

Men fail at sex and relationships constantly. Admit it.

Elon Musk failed as a man and James Bond is a violent alcoholic.

The world is different than what movies and reddit tell you.

This “free love” bullshit is a sales pitch for guilt-tripping good women into becoming free hookers, using the feminine urge to please and marry well as a weapon against them. The best trick the “sexual revolution” pulled off was convincing women it was for them. Who is praised for being a slut in this ‘culture’?

Ruin the men as husbands, leaders, and the whole family unit fails too. There’s no female equivalent of deadbeat because there doesn’t have to be – getting to the men suffices. Tell men a wife who loves them and a legacy of children will drag them down and white men won’t be a problem in the future, they’ll go extinct. You can’t have patriarchy without patriarchs. 

The term cuckold or cuckquean must be used where appropriate too.

The men rationalize it like they’re deep for being shallow and the women…. are coerced into going along (hey, isn’t that rape?) when adultery voids any ‘marriage’ legally. Polygamists don’t mention that.

Any man who’d be the town bike should expect to be rejected (to ask someone to be your sex toy is ultimately demeaning) – however, promiscuous pop culture tells them on the contrary, STDs and issues with your mother make one more desirable!

And when women IRL avoid them, go out of their way to avoid providing even a phone number, it isn’t the way nature avoids that futile encounter in all her wisdom, it’s that the women are “shallow” or “flakes”. Sure. Sure they are, stud. Evolution must be wrong, not you!

It’s a fact men nowadays see an attractive woman and assume she is sexually available – regardless of her marital status, religion or simple preference. That is intensely creepy, it’s Brave New World. Further, many expect crass sexual attentions are a compliment (porn brainwashing) and that they feel entitled to coldly fuck at least some of the women they are aroused by, as if being attractive has a price where you owe sexual services to anyone who notices. Gee, why don’t women try to be attractive anymore?

Why were women far more attractive when that was assumed to earn monogamy? When it was respectable instead of shamed? Mystery there.

If you think this disloyalty doesn’t relate to low trust, you haven’t been paying attention.

It’s like the guys who say women who reject them must be rejecting them personally… and to prove how “nice” they are, get angry. You’ve proven they were correct to avoid you, you’re unstable, that’s proof.

Nobody wants to be the low bid in the auction.

Denying the impulse to pair bond is cruel and sex solidifies that bond biologically.

If you’re happy, you don’t shop around.

e.g.

I’ve yet to see an open relationship that isn’t painfully dysfunctional. I’m sure it probably exists, but it very much seems the exception.

Yeah …and they’re literally killing people.

Pathogenic etiology cancers, the main reason teens from the Free Love era are suddenly dropping like flies.

Naturally, true cause isn’t on the death certificate.
They want to be whores and manwhores, but they don’t want their grandkids to know.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867418303635
“We conducted the largest investigation of predisposition variants in cancer to date, discovering 853 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 8% of 10,389 cases from 33 cancer types.”
So far.

The wages of sin seem to be paid to the Reaper.

And don’t call the swingers, swingers. The PC term is sexual snowflake.

You’d think the slutty billionaires in Silicon Valley would fund STD treatments. All the billions mean nothing in an early grave.

The disconnect from reality is fatal.

Like how the cohab slut arrangement isn’t like “kept women” prostitution, keeping a “mistress” (from brothel madam) in an apartment, whether you call them a girlfriend or not. No wonder “try before you buy” leads to divorce.

Video: It isn’t sexism, it’s evolution

If you hate being a man so much, get a sex change (if you think it’s so easy). [1]

Lindybeige:

“How do you get a man to do a dangerous job?”

“Easy! Tell ’em it’s manly.”

[2]

I’ll spend the rest of my life recovering from that secondhand burn.

1 It’s like the guys who say being a single mother or housewife is easy…. then be the parent at home. You can do that but you won’t because you know you’re lying. Or become a nanny if kids are so easy to take care of “properly” and women exploit the system for easy money. Anything with a lot of time and money you’d be jumping to do and you don’t.

2 Patriarchy manipulates more men than Satan. March off to war and abandon your family for the glories of trenchfoot because Churchill’s banker friends wanted to make more money off your bullet-ridden corpse! Even now “manly” is how America sells its servitude – even to women!

Progress!

The people who’d oppose the title are essentially schizo on evolution, they’re tradlarping: “I’m redpill and there are sex differences but if women don’t act exactly like a man and do their ‘fair share’ [3] they hate men….  [4] except when they outdo men at ‘male things’, those bitches.” They’re borderline cases. They’re hopeless.

They think being traditional is easier than being modern. [5] I’ll wait here while the real trad people laugh at that.

It’s very simple logic e.g.

If women are helpless in a fight (inc. a rapist), they can’t be drafted.

Fact, policy consequence. There’s a specific context and application.

Wanting a taller, stronger male to lift furniture is not sexist, it’s prudence.

And you can always say no.

These guys act like any time a woman asks something they must acquiesce.

No. Grow up. Learn to politely say no.

3 Socialists. Lazy goddamned socialists.

4 A person who hated men wouldn’t care if you knew that fact so…. what? What is this as a train of thought? Projection?

Actual misandrists go on marches and stuff, they’re very open about it. Disagreeing with a man or refusing to put up with his effeminate impossible bullshit is not sexism. It isn’t about your sex, it’s your shitty personality, and if you’re going to blame your entire sex for this, who really hates men?

(it’s projection, said so)

And y u never mention race or class?

Classically, and presently, bigger struggles within the male world.
Ah, but picking on women has no consequences, they’re just cowards.

Nagging turns a woman’s nether regions into the Sahara.
Crying about things is what babies do. Women are not sexually attracted to it.

5 Fake K-types are just too lazy to embrace r-selection so they wanna leech off the juiciest steak of self-sufficient people by throwing around words like Community and Masculinity. Instead of having a family of their own and earning their own keep.

You know, like a real man.

As soon as it gets a little bit difficult, they’ll run away.

That’s why no woman wants them too. They’re dead weights.

Women are the picky sex in this species and any man who complains about this is just further advertising why she was correct.

It sounds like this

Person A: you’re getting fat.

Person B: I can’t believe you just said that! [6] I’m down to fifty Oreos a day!

And if they thought that was actually a good point. They didn’t really listen and understand the interaction.

6 Another tell.

Women deal with problems by talking, a man who cannot listen is worthless.
We don’t mind dealing with normal men with indoor voices, the guy who won’t listen, all bitchy with rationalizations? That’s low IQ and everyone hates dealing with them, it isn’t that they’re men, it’s that they’re annoyingly stupid.

At least other men don’t have to put up with the sexual side of the low IQ men – but women do, and it’s the worst part of them. It’s more obnoxious than all the other parts put together.

Men don’t believe this unless they rarely see it e.g. walking up to a woman and trying to force a conversation when her man is standing right there. We fume too, on the inside. The modern lack of manners hurts men more. Because the stupid ones have no leash.

Women assume any man walking up to them is too stupid to actually hold a conversation, otherwise they’d meet you a normal way (not the ghetto trash method). The worst are when the woman understands his point better than he does i.e. she correctly anticipates a come-on and says she isn’t interested to spare his blushes then he misinterprets this kindness and tries to gaslight her into thinking it wasn’t that (nobody is fooled) and she must be vain (when he walked up to her based on looks).

If no one ever “gets you” become a goth, you’re not complicated, you’re dumb.

India and China must go to war because they killed their women. Don’t do it, America. The lazy guys were genetic dead-ends anyway, don’t listen to them. They want other mens’ lines to die out too with utter chaos and ruin so “if they can’t have it, no one else can”.

It’s sexism to expect women to act like men or vice versa, yes there are exceptions but generally.

Monogamous men disempower bad women because they can’t use their one biochemical psyops weapon – orgasms. SJWs fear good husbands.

So who does Patriarchy fear? The fornicators. They’re weakened physically and compromised in society.

What kind of “Revolution” happened in the 60s? Why? It weakened the men.  They wanted to party and have it all than found a family.

The men who complain about being “manipulated” by women are always sluts, aren’t they? It’s like the gambler who goes to casinos and wonders what happened. It’s almost like people with weak impulse control suffer consequences for it – and society is damaged too.

If they want equality of outcome, well, both sinners should be punished.

Idiots. They got what they wanted and still moan.

Same guys who complain birth rate – as bachelors.

First comes love, then comes _____….. 

Those “men” are quite simply, simple.

The answer was bitchy videos on Youtube about “Western” fertility, obviously. And of course they always fucked (they’re scared of the word “fucked”*) women on the Pill, obviously. [7] “Spermjacking” isn’t really a thing, you donate sperm, that’s a choice. Society is not responsible for where you stick it.

*banged, smashed, screwed, the tells of a Peter Pan manchild

they brag about being really bad in bed with violent metaphor

Patriarchy basically opposes the cult of individualism and the delusion that the damage of hedonism is contained to the person doing it. No, the wastrel abuses their family with their hedonism. They’re a bad son/brother/father/husband.

7 If they knew ANYTHING about the subject, they’d know it’s the economy. Men can’t afford to marry and support a housewife, financially.

Fertility rate is connected to GDP.

Do you see why Trump is so important?

Homework: so when I complain about national debt oppressing us, how many future children do you think it’s murdering?