Video: Save the planet, eat people

One perk of accelerationism. Normies rise.

Not a cannibal = conservative. Well… yeah. If conservative = human and humane.

I wasn’t exaggerating. I am also mortified.

London already has a roaring under-the-table market for ‘bushmeat’ i.e. other humanoid mammals like baby monkey. I suspect this will be their in. It was even justified in an episode of Whitechapel years ago by the main character (rationalization is Satanic) where it looked like a ‘villain’ character burned (in an oven) what looked just like a curled up human baby. That was one of the worst cliffhanger ad breaks I’ve ever experienced. I think I got low level PTSD from it. Apparently it was just a baby monkey… because that’s fine???? Yeah, don’t watch that show. It’s also ripe as a vector for an ebola-style pandemic because once it’s made the species jump it can transmit in many other ways. Nobody’s safe.

Foodies = creepy, creepy people.

Even vegans eat human semen, remember. Vegans and actors.

They’re also pushing in magazines and the papers all sorts of obscure “food clubs” as elite (and worryingly, prestige Unis do have them… why?). I think a Surprise! style horror reveal will follow, a clear violation of human rights to informed consent. It is easily challenged on these grounds.

I’ve also seen a theme of human brain ‘milkshakes’ in a lot of media as mystery ‘protein’.

Male entitlement crushed by ancient Jews

-puts paid to the notion that Weinsteins would be enabled, although it might’ve only applied to Jewish women (who Weinstein still targeted).

3254 words. In a conservative society, saying any of this would be unnecessary.

https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.75a?lang=bi

Apropos the discussion of the obligation to allow oneself to be killed rather than engage in forbidden sexual intercourse, the Gemara notes that Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: There was an incident involving a certain man who set his eyes upon a certain woman and passion rose in his heart, to the point that he became deathly ill. And they came and asked doctors what was to be done with him. And the doctors said: He will have no cure until she engages in sexual intercourse with him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not engage in sexual intercourse with him. The doctors said: She should at least stand naked before him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not stand naked before him. The doctors suggested: The woman should at least converse with him behind a fence in a secluded area, so that he should derive a small amount of pleasure from the encounter. The Sages insisted: Let him die, and she may not converse with him behind a fence.

Voyeurism/cuck culture from Jewish (or Fake Jew, YMMV) pornography has addled the brains of many men. Blame the enemy, not your tribal women.

No rape or fornicating. Better God strike you down for your lust.

Now that’s the God I recognise from the Old Testament and Jesus’ orders to look away.

It is also evil for men (doctors) to enable or encourage sin, which checks out. A lot of ‘therapists’ encourage self-destruction, body and soul, to this day. It is likewise, wrong.

Modern men should be ashamed if they lack basic impulse control, ancient men saw women literally walking round with their tits out (Greece, other places) and were man enough not to rape anyone. Clearly, you can’t blame clothes. While God made tits for babies, that doesn’t include crybabies. Like, lesbians don’t want to rape women in the gym shower? Man up.

Or is the muh dick “sexual emergency” sodomy of that Muslim in a white country to a little boy suddenly righteous?

Moving the goalposts won’t work. It’ll just enable gays and pedos to rape you…. a ….slippery slope… indeed….

Entitlement is physical, whether it’s Communists wanting your coin or rapists wanting your, ahem, ‘dignity’. It’s rank materialism and thus rejects all claims or ties to spirituality as a matter of course.

When you think about it, from fat acceptance SJWs to so-called incels, who both wish to impose, they’re all Sexual Communists. It’s Brave New World bullshit. Nobody else cares about what you want, snowflake.

Strangers owe you NOTHING. It’s like Commies who feel entitled to a job from the ‘evil capitalist scum’.

You hate them, no?!

Slavery is illegal, all the actions of it too, like rape or stealing labour. Human rights aren’t going anywhere without you all being drafted to die gored on barbed wire for Israel’s profit margins in the barbed wire sector.

This sexual begging will astonish historians. Especially when they have porn, specialist toys and hands. Their T-levels are pushed even higher with masturbation, why it was called self-abuse. A sexbot would reject them, and probably kill them – Terminator prequel?

Ask them how many gay guys would feel entitled to their hole if ‘everybody belonged to everybody else’, they might get the point. Women have minds and feelings too, like people! God’s people! If women can’t say no to the Darwinian unfit, neither can you because out there, somewhere, is a man who wants to sodomize you – I guarantee it. The standard of most homo men is “they possess an anus” based on the count statistics (100s-1000s, if allowed) so they might get a nasty surprise if any of this actually happened, legally. Actually, is this how Sodom started? Pretty sure.

This type of entitled male complains about prison rape (I’m a victim but not directly attitude) but hey, aren’t they saying it’s okay and even moral if a man feels lust? They’re directly justifying prison rape.

Since you don’t need to consent if a man wants to injure your body, right?

“I want” is a train of thought even a toddler should be shamed for. When your brain develops beyond this, they’re just taking the piss falling back on it. Either get over it (simply by looking away, as Jesus wisely prescribed) OR they’re so brain damaged (poor impulse control is a dominant sign of low IQ) that they belong in an asylum where the wicked existence of the world won’t ‘tempt’ them to be predators (monasteries are also an option, although probably just a more open model of asylum on the same grounds).

Entitlement is a sick combination of practically every sin, especially pride, envy, greed and obviously lust. Anyone trying to justify it as moral is at best a moral relativist and at worst a rapist looking for social approval.

Sex is not a human need. It never has been (especially for women but I digress). You do not need it. You do not need it to live, either. That is a pleasure rhetoric myth from the 60s Free Love hippy bullshit. “Love is all you need” – okay, stop beating your Asian wife first, John. Same guy: “Imagine all the people, living life in peace…” – apply it to your own house first, you abusive prick.

It’s a sign of the backward atheist times that even guys deriding Muslim rape gangs in one breath will use the next to justify their own aspirations to rape a woman for ‘tempting’ them.* This isn’t India or Pakistan, it’s the First World. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, we shoot them. Women looked better in the 50s (1750s, 1850s, and 1950s) and men weren’t catcalling, harassing, stalking and raping them as punishment for being feminine (which have no doubt, is exactly what it is). They can just go live in places that do punish women for femininity (move to Saudi Arabia) but it won’t make them happy either. You’re not entitled to attention from anyone, which is really what the AA for men guys actually want: to jump up the masculine hierarchy without earning respect.

Woman: <is feminine>

Rapists: it’s free real estate.

“Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife” or daughter or sister or aunt…… etc.

[*Actually, how many fakecels are non-white? Where’s that survey? If most of them are browns who feel entitled to white wimminz, because they moved West, that might explain a lot.]

Applying ghetto culture to white societies has and will be the death of us. Catcalling was just the start. White men should be shamed for acting black like that, it’s so immature, like a dog chasing a car. White people use indoor voices, we don’t ‘holler’. Incels don’t dare turn on rap for brainwashing and insulting white people, a notable omission.

The expansion of the discussion of this story is interesting.

The Gemara comments: Rabbi Ya’akov bar Idi and Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani disagree about this issue. One of them says: The woman in question was a married woman, and the other one says: She was unmarried.The Gemara tries to clarify the issue: Granted, according to the one who saysthat she was a married woman, the matter is properly understood. Since the case involved a severely prohibited forbidden relationship, the Sages did not allow any activity hinting at intimacy. But according to the one who says that she was unmarried, what is the reason for all this opposition? Why did the Sages say that the man must be allowed to die, rather than have the woman do as was requested?

Women aren’t whores unless forced by slavery, simple. God made women with dignity, not as sex toys.

The creeps tend to have three motives – physical obviously, social in bragging about their ‘conquests’ (pathetic) and stealing intimacy, forcing a loss of dignity (that humiliating is pathological, specifically psychopathic).

Naturally, the pathological always claim to be normal and even good, evil lies.

Rav Pappa says: This is due to the potential family flaw, i.e., harm to the family name, as it is not permitted to bring disgrace to the entire family in order to save the lovesick man. Rav Aḥa, son of Rav Ika, says: This is so that the daughters of Israel should not be promiscuous with regard to forbidden sexual relations. Were they to listen to the doctors’ recommendations, Jewish women might lose moral restraint.

Proof narcissists have always existed and saner cultures stamped them down like the cockroaches they are. Rapists (inc. would-be rapists) will literally try to hold society to ransom like we should give a damn about their ‘problems’. Sexually perverse extortion. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, again. White people are simply too civilized and high IQ to consider our own people property, our women aren’t poker chips – not to Western creeps or Middle Eastern ones.

Yes, it is degrading, to the family and the woman, who is also a member of said family.

Ordering round women you aren’t related to is… sad, to say the least. Controlling men are always ironically weak in character, it’s reaction formation.

Nobody should follow the weak, neither women nor men. Appeasement of the freaks is r-selected.

These efforts to corrupt women, in this story or the various incel “I deserve/women should…” posts are depraved.

Spot the r-type:

The Gemara asks: But if the woman was unmarried, let the man marry her.The Gemara answers:His mind would not have been eased by marriage, in accordance with the statement of Rabbi Yitzḥak. As Rabbi Yitzḥak says: Since the day the Temple was destroyed, sexual pleasure was taken away from those who engage in permitted intercourse and given to transgressors, as it is stated: “Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant”(Proverbs 9:17). Therefore, the man could have been cured only by engaging in illicit sexual interaction.

Scorn degeneracy or it defiles society, one example at a time. A rotten apple spoils the barrel.

“let him marry her” implies she or her family wants to let her remain with the lech (Jews, being civilized, didn’t have forced marriage, the woman chose)

Logically, if it was illicit 1. he’s wronging society, 2. he should be punished (stoning should do it) and 3. then it shouldn’t matter what other men or women (inc her father) think, since it wouldn’t be illicit if they approved any intimacy.

You’re not entitled to anything from strangers, anything, from men or women.

This shouldn’t need be explained to adults.

Being logically sound, they also enforced death penalty as a punishment equally for male or female sinners, it was purely based on the crime.

The prohibition and punishment apply both in cases

You can’t run a society on 50% degeneracy.

If men are the moral authority, their immorality is more evil, since their standard is higher by choice.

Even if all women shut their legs tomorrow, men would still sin and probably just with each other (like the Navy).

Take responsibility for your own feels, weaklings.

The baraita continues: Lewdness is stated here, with regard to the punishment: “There shall be no lewdness among you” (Leviticus 20:14), and lewdness is stated there, with regard to the prohibition: “You shall not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter; you shall not take her son’s daughter, or her daughter’s daughter, to uncover her nakedness; they are near kinswomen, it is lewdness” (Leviticus 18:17). It is derived by means of a verbal analogy that just as there the prohibition applies to the woman’s daughter, and the daughter of her daughter, and the daughter of her son, so too here, the punishment of burning applies to one who engages in intercourse with the woman’s daughter, and to the daughter of her daughter, and to the daughter of her son.

See the tie-in to Christian society, this is germane.

So that Jewish story explains Leviticus.

Also, playing Man Card to rape relatives is obviously evil, no “But muh Patriarchy” isn’t get out of Hell free.

Execution by burning is more severe than execution by stoning

That explains Jesus telling the lustful how they’ll burn.

Interestingly, they killed sinners prior to rape (i.e. damaging the woman).

The baraita taught that the word “sin” is referring to women who are forbidden to a man by a prohibition the violation of which renders him liable to receive karet. From here it is derived that a man who attempts to rape a woman who is forbidden to him under penalty of karet may be killed.

And Rabbi Yehuda maintains that the Merciful One says that a rapist must be killed because his victim is prepared to sacrifice her life rather than yield to rape.

Well, yeah. Rape is worse than murder to women. Men would feel the same if they had the same anatomy and/or could get pregnant. The film Alien was a horror film about one man’s fear of rape and being pregnant, true story.

Let the rapist be, she is saying this so that he should not kill her, and therefore the rapist is not killed.

Let the rape victim decide if the rapist is killed, sounds totally fair. He took away her right over her body, it’s kosher she should get a right over his. There is also the common connection between rapists also murdering their victims, so this acknowledges that in a poetic way.

The same laws Christianity is based on also allow self defense to save a life including prevent crime (such as rape).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikuach_nefesh

So killing a rapist as they attempt it is kosher too, but also mentioned in the Bible as crying out (for the mob to kill him).

The ‘doctors’ were appealing to that valid breach of the law (where it was invalid) to prevent death but an entitled degenerate isn’t going to die from lack of sex or all monks would’ve keeled over in six months. The incels who kvetch “but I’ll die without an Asian GF” should just off themselves if they really believed that. I wonder how many are borderlines, because threatening suicide (even to strangers) to manipulate people is textbook borderline personality (and this apparently happened in ancient times).

“But I’ll die because muh Dick”

“Okay, die.” – society.

Naturally, their bluff is false because they come back to it over literally years.

Aren’t you dead yet? Weren’t you supposed to be dead in like, the 90s? Promise?

The First World should mock Muh Dicks the way it did historically when it was proud and coincidentally successful. Victim culture bleeding into sex/rape is predictable but evil. Rapists in prison claiming they dindu nuffin started it. No, men needn’t lay SJW fatties. No, white women needn’t lay smelly Muslims. No no no no no.

Muh Dicks – putting the mental in victim mentality.

The fact many claim to be libertarian (your rights end….!) is uniquely hilarious.

Your agency is crap and you should feel bad. A lot of people don’t get laid, including religious types, they don’t obsess over it or threaten to hurt anyone. And aren’t libertarians claiming any degeneracy as a social good if there’s consent? So their one true evil would be anyone who violates consent…. like SJW fatties or the bitter rapey majority of ‘incels’.

When both Jesus and his sage forebears from his ancestral religion say the same thing: you are responsible for being tempted, not the thing you ogle, then it’s pretty clear what’s what.

Ogling is a sin.

I say thing because art, billboards etc. They even do this to things, hence object in objectification. We call them wankers for a reason.

“allow” the pitiful excuse for a man to die

God wants the weak to perish, he goes on and on about it and how the way is narrow et al. He sends tests all the time.

rather than have the woman do as was requested?Implies she wanted nothing to do with the creep, even as his wife. So basically you had a predator with a personality disorder (but I repeat myself) trying to force a random woman into letting him (by the power of the law!) rape her instead of killing him, as was her legal right to self defense.

I could ‘request’ a lot of things from men, it doesn’t make me entitled to them.
Other people are not wish genies.

Bloody losers. I bet he’d malinger to dodge the draft, too. Coercion is immoral, a sign of low character.

Having freedom of choice is THE freedom of white, First World societies. THE liberty our ancestors died for.

Both employers, the military (and women) can tell you, NO, you’re unsuitable for this role.

And you have to accept that, rejection is a fact of life. Women get rejected all the time, including in CV studies. We also get rejected at the HR level for being too attractive according to the SJW hags residing therein, so this alleged advantage is pure fiction.

We can reject and be rejected. You can’t nag the system of evolution into changing – the bird that picks up no stone has no mate.

This can include if there are no other applicants. There is no obligation to just accept anyone. Plenty of women are single rather than settle for a whiny entitled soyboy who’d dodge the draft. I wonder if the incel subs (which is not all celibate people obviously* as they claim, anymore than LGB bullshit represents most gays) have polled their attributes. e.g. How many so-called incels choose to be fat? Choose not to shower? Choose not to work?

Can those choices really be called the fault of women? They have no qualms blaming fat SJWs for their own weight, even in true medical cases where it’s morally grotesque e.g. permanent Pill damage, thyroid issue, genetic disorder.

*On the contrary, most celibates I’ve met were really happy about it. No drama, no stress, no disease, plenty of time for sublimation into hobbies or work or the family they already have. Maybe the innocuous (minority of internet) incels are just sick of virgin shaming, which is a very real and precise issue (very small but brutal and wrong) to do with sexualisation and objectification of people based on their sex life (and what Hollywood tries to force us to think it “should” be). However, they contribute to that culture by assuming that women are sleeping around without them (and verbally abusing them for the imaginary slight) when statistically their peers are having less sex than their parents and you know most of that’s the minority of thots skewing the already low data a bit higher. If society praised the virtues of the innocuous ones, their chastity, would they be miserable? Doubtful. I put it to you those are not ‘incels’ because they’re not misogynists or rapists or anything like that, they’re not trying to control others either, they’re just sick of Hollywood’s culty pressure to dictate what they do with their dick. That is 100% justified.

The Sages raised a dilemma before Rabbi Ami: Is a descendant of Noah,who is commanded to refrain from idol worship, also commanded about the sanctification of God’s name, or is he not commanded about the sanctification of God’s name?

It’s interesting to read their little tizzies to understand later metaphors and tie-ins to Christianity later.

Funny to note: no report of the wannabe rapist actually dying. Borderlines bluff.

There’s no such thing as a tease

It’s a porn lie. They’re selling you the idea of sexually forward women.

Or Hollywood Lolita pedo bullshit.

A ‘tease’ is what creeps say to attractive women who existed in their vicinity.

You are not entitled to sex. There’s no coy, they’re just not interested. In studies, these types of men have been proven to assume sexual interest from women where there was none, deluding themselves. Nobody is leading them on, but you have to humour the crazy to get away. Picture it like a hoodie approaching you asking for something. Be nice and get away.
They are being civilized, women are conditioned to smile, it’s polite.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Braincels/comments/az1w3j/do_you_hate_it_when_women_on_the_streets_smile_at/

They’re such cowards they’ll literally body slam a woman, the weaker sex.
Literal assault.
You’re angry with men? Pick on your own sex.
But if they continue to physically assault women walking in public, they’ll get plenty of ‘sex’ in prison.

Things that make women evil, according to incels:

being female
(being male, too)
being male and looking female
being ambiguously male or female
looking at them
not looking at them
smiling at them
not smiling at them
being fat
being thin
being tall
being short
being smart
being dumb
being scientific
not being scientific
being soldiers
not being soldiers
being mothers
not being mothers
being wives
being single
being Christian
being atheist
having sex
not having sex
make-up
no make-up
fake nails
natural nails
expensive hairdo
crap hairdo
dressing feminine
not dressing feminine
curves
no curves
caring what men think
not caring what men think
having opinions
not having opinions
working hard
being lazy
voting
not voting
paying taxes
not paying taxes
having a job
being on welfare
being a boss
being married to a boss
paying for their own meal
not paying for their own meal
attention-whoring
avoiding them
oppressing them with relationships
not oppressing them with relationships
having kids, with anyone
having no kids, with anyone
race-mixing
not race-mixing
showing skin
wearing long skirts
posting bikini shots
not posting bikini shots
flirting randomly
not flirting
being clingy
being a cold-hearted bitch
getting emotional
having none of the feels

Need I go on? Clearly, women are not the problem.

Near the end of that long, long list:

killing your kids
making them pay child support
reporting rape
not reporting rape
being murdered
being alive

Maybe they just have anger issues? They are the most triggered people ALIVE.
Offended by literally anything.

But it isn’t misogyny!

They don’t HATE women, they just want single wives who are whorish virgins with all and no sexual XP, fertile but not too much, exactly the religious they are, a domestic slave that doesn’t need to be paid or sleep or work or clean or tend to babies while homesteading and living in the city because of the bars, with magical gravity defying tiddies despite breastfeeding at least 12 babies, all vaginal deliveries with no complications, tearing or stretch marks.

See? Totally reasonable.

She also never has periods (but fertile) and manages to keep a perfect figure, even throughout pregnancy and lactation.

It isn’t women they hate, just women who don’t live up to their standard, which totally existed in the ambiguous Past in the vague Culture they keep talking about [citation needed].

Because beggars can indeed be choosers and they choose the best.

Women are obviously entitled snowflakes who project because men are flawless and never wrong, that’s why their death rate is high, drug abuse is high, crime is high, mental problems are high and IQs are globally tanked.

The politics of all these wonderful male politicians has given us such a peaceful, logical society.

Women: exist
Incels: …bitch

Women are so IRRATIONAL, AREN’T THEY?

Yet another exciting round of ‘why everything is women’s fault even though men are statistically in charge’.

It’s like atheists with Christians but sex-specific, which isn’t even a choice.

What kind of Satanism is this? They must be operating from a spiritual void, but which one?

Don’t tread on me means don’t tell me to fucking smile, it’s weird. Nobody finds a man that insecure about a stranger’s facial expression charming.

Women are striking, you just don’t see it.

No future? Fine, no bother.

If men don’t wanna get married, the motivation for women giving a single shit what they “think” flutters out the window, drops and dies on the pavement.

If that were true, women would be having less sex than older generations at the same age. Check.

Women would be less likely to report as feminists? Check.

Women would be voting Brexit and Trump. Check.

Women would be focusing on career since men won’t be the provider? Check.

Women would be insulting men who refuse their gender role. Check.

Women wouldn’t sleep around because there’s nothing in it. Check.

All the damn checks. And you know the worst part?

Literal psychopaths

Misogyny is a known trait in this type. If God is dead, this type of person killed Him.

The murderer lied about being her “boyfriend” too, these people belong in asylums.

We really do live in Satan’s realm.

Like, the murderer actually thought having any kind of vaguely sexual claim to her would make decapitation more okay. The idea that learning some cheap lines would ‘save’ such monsters is baseless and asking for the insanity to be turned on the silly men offering non-solutions.

Ironically, they complain about pretty women existing (online or just anyway) and then never question their own complicity in seeking them out. The degeneracy is an exchange – you perving over women for hours a day is on you. That is a choice. If ‘thots’ exist, it is only because you feed them.

Assuming there’s something evil about a woman for basically not being fat i.e. attractive, is utterly ridiculous. The atheist contempt for nature’s beauty continues. They actually think porn is real and women are like that. How long until this is connected to porn?

Tranny sex offender tried sneaking into school

Repeat Sexual Offender Arrested After Dressing Like Woman to Sneak Into School: Geoffrey Kelley

Ballygawley, County Tyrone, UK – A man convicted of three previous sexual offenses has been arrested after he was accused of donning a wig and women’s clothing to enter a local school.

Police accuse Geoffrey Rainey Kelly, aged 35, of putting on a white skirt, pink jacket, pearl necklace and blonde wig, and gaining entry to St Ciaran’s College through a side door.

Not premeditated at all.

School staff say they caught Mr Kelley wandering the halls and attempting to turn the handle on various doors.

When confronted by staff, the man claimed to be searching for a particular third-year female pupil, and gave staff the name. Staff could not find a child listed with the name on the school register, and questioned him further.

Lying.

And what if they had such a kid? Let that thing in a room with them?

Mr Kelly then stated that he was “just looking around.”

It would make sense if most misogynists (sexual predator kind) just pretended to be trannies to attack women in gym showers. It would make sense.

He left the school and drove away in a vehicle, and was later arrested by police at Ballygawley Park and Ride, still wearing the clothing described by St Ciaran’s staff.

Declaring Mr Kelley at high risk of re-offending and noncompliance with bail conditions, Judge Mark McGarrity denied him bail, noting that he had violated a Sexual Offences Prevention Order that bans him from coming within 20 meters of schools and other places frequented by minors under age 18.

like only minors should be protected?

Mr Kelly has prior convictions for sexual assaulting female individuals in 2016 and 2017, and a 2017 conviction for entering a clothing store and emerging from the changing room fully naked in front of a 16-year-old girl who was employed there.

Rehabilitation is impossible when they enjoy offending, literally.

The cure for pedophilia is lead.

also here

Sex offender caught wandering school dressed as woman

Also, library drag freak a convicted pedophile.

“Drag Queen Storytime” Reader at Houston Library a Convicted Paedophile: Albert Garza

Pedos don’t dress up like the big bad wolf anymore, but a hooker.

Old man angry he made a stupid investment

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/millennials-stop-banging-on-about-your-box-set-bore-athons-and-g/

It’s just so wrong.

Multiculturalism has killed clubbing. White women don’t want to go to a dark place full of white fever fetishists who are so uncivilized they think they can ignore the word ‘No’. If you’re harassed or assaulted by a savage, YOU might get arrested for being a white woman and rejecting them/reporting them. One of their first tactics is to accuse you of “racism” so …yeah. They’re that entitled and creepy. You can try to deny this but women vote with their feet.

We’re using what little freedom of association we still have to white flight out of a scene which PRESUMES you wanted to be attacked.

If no isn’t respected as an option, we nope out of there. Men get attacked by foreigners too.
The low IQ do not know the rules or feel exempt and nag and nag and have all sorts of ‘tricks’ they think are acceptable to get in your way. They think white women are whores and clubs are the brothel. They ask to “borrow” money from white men, like, everybody’s avoiding the Rotherham types.

Being targeted for our race and sex is racist but the police are ‘diverse’ and probably related to them.

We don’t drink there (it’s also a date rape drug, good luck getting a jury to listen to you), we don’t like the music and you can’t have a conversation. Then there’s the middle-age guys acting like an abusive stepdad, trying to get you drunk purely to rape you – who pretend it isn’t rape*, they just want you nice and weak… Let’s line up to be felt up by aged Peter Pans!

Yay, let’s spend hundreds like the stupid American rappers buying bottle service!

This is an IQ test.

Private parties and member’s clubs are thriving because it’s basically allowed to be natives only.

Genophilia is a human impulse and right, genocide involves not allowing an assembly of a group with its own kind.

The Race Relations Act killed London. We have freedom of association in public and clubs, for example, are not public. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_Relations_Act_1965

If we could all legally consent to avoid the anti-white predators, clubs would be more popular than ever.

“which extended the legislation’s remit to cover employment and housing”

The acts of statute are invalid because the native’s natural right to freedom of association and property rights are inviolate.

According to this, you don’t actually own your company or house. The government has taken the right of ownership to tell you who you must include.. but the Garrick still excludes women, this is just a race thing.

The thing they claim doesn’t exist.

We’d go to pubs if the Muslims stopped getting them closed. Why is there social housing in London? Why are taxpayers forced to commute in?

*If they don’t want you sober, they don’t want you. That isn’t courtship, it’s predation.