Encouraging men to be criminals isn’t ‘alpha’

This is the stupidest Alpha posturing post I have ever seen.

http://alphagameplan.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/live-bold.html

The manosphere makes the simple error of availability bias: they base all of their advice on an entire sex, which exists worldwide with as much variance as men, around the narrowest of demographic bands: white American sluts with nothing better to do than hang out at bars (alcoholics).

You can spit in a girl’s face and she will still be attracted to you. You can call her terrible vulgar names and she will still be attracted to you. You can even beat her up repeatedly and she will still be attracted to you.

Do you want to attract borderlines? Because that’s how you attract borderlines.

Women aren’t crazy, the ones attracted to you are.
Once you hit double, triple digits of failed affairs, the problem isn’t the women, the common denominator of failed relationships is you. Dodging responsibility is such a feminist move e.g. women shouldn’t carry weapons to defend themselves, why are women being attacked?

Do you blame the people giving you this advice? No. You know they’re trashy when you got involved and you liked it. You don’t get to change your mind at the end and pretend you were taken in. The PUA-types like Bad Girls and want a Good Girl’s Happy Ending. It’s deluded as the career woman thinking she can pick up a man at 30 like dry cleaning.

No wonder these guys get hauled in front of the courts on assault charges and rape accusations, they 100% deserve it if this is the nonsense they internalize. Then play Victim like the bitchy gamma they secretly are. If confronted by such a woman’s brothers, uncles or father, they’d shriek like a banshee, we all know it. This macho posturing is now opening up the door to incitement, since when is attacking women a show of strength? I covered the reddit abusers trying to justify their crminal actions as redpill (using it as a shield, little cowards) when actually redpill theory is essentialism, traditonalism, that treats the weaker sex with respect because they don’t have to prove anything to anyone (this is all homoerotic posturing to other, decent men, who are naturally disgusted). It gets worse.

You can be a complete psychopath, murder your parents, or tattoo a swastika into your forehead, and more than a few women will actually find that attractive.

Kevin-Hart-Really-o rlly lies

All it takes is one sperg to believe you. These are the ones saying SlutHate are deluded for thinking women value looks (lookism). Hybristophilia is a fetish. It occurs in men too. That’s like say all men are trannies, and secretly want dresses, because a few men like to wear little girl dresses and feel a desire to self-castrate. It’s so damn wrong I don’t believe I have to point this out, what are you all thinking? You don’t know the female mind better than us. We don’t know yours better than you. Quit playing Professor Xavier and gaslighting already vulnerable mentally ill women into fitting your delusions on the entire sex (the ‘You Really Wanted It’ line is used by rapists btw, that won’t look good in court). You can make a vulnerable person believe anything (see white female Islam converts for a fitting example), but that doesn’t make it true.

The signalling to other men re violence should involve violence toward other men.
If someone challenges you to a fight in a bar, you don’t punch his girlfriend, what the hell is wrong with you? What happened to the manosphere (my guess, keyboard alpha entryism) to make this signalling reach the mass hysterical point where saying this is not only OK but met with praise?

I just.... I don't even know what to....what??

You have criminal responsibility and moral agency, you’re old enough to know better. So many people reading this are 25+, well beyond the age total ignorance is acceptable. Weren’t these guys saying we should hold men to a higher moral standard because they need to lead women? And to do it all to impress some slut? What sort of pedestal BS is that? No bitch is worth prison!

Have you actually seen Dark Triad people IRL? I don’t mean streaming Dexter on Netflix and feeling witty or reviving a videotape of American Psycho or Fight Club. Actual psychopaths and sociopaths? Have you seen what their life outcomes are and what happens once they’re past their prime (35+) and people stop putting up with their abusive nonsense and giving them 12th chances? When they’re held to an adult standard?

Read Hare’s accounts of psychopaths and read how bitchy and depressed they are and you will know pretty damn quickly these are people nobody should emulate. They hate themselves and their own lives and punish others out of envy.

You know what happens to them?

Dead or prison-raped, in general.

What marvellous advice for modern men already getting that Men Are Evil propaganda from the feminists, thanks for the show of faith in boys. That’s exactly what they want you to do, so much so I suspect this may be a black ops coup of the Narrative.

It leads me to believe the manosphere bought into black gang culture and genuinely believe criminals are glamorous, as opposed to the truth, where they’re as low as junkies and nobody shows them respect.

Going by this, any man showing deference to any woman socially (called manners and etiquette, boors) is a ‘pussy.’ Considering the type always slinging that insult (themselves losers), who cares what those manboys think? That’s the general attitude of every great man I’ve ever met.

‘Oh, you call me a pussy. Am I supposed to care?’ 

If you can be moved around like a little pawn by a word, you’re no better than the SJWs. If calling you chicken like Marty McFly will make you kill yourself, you aren’t brave, you’re terminally stupid.
Sticks and stones, bitches! Don’t react to a few non-applicable terms like they’re a punch in the face or an insult to your manhood.

If all you care about is counting notches, you don’t have any honour to speak of and everyone knows it.

This is meant to be an evopsych argument (women are programmed to like this – in the State of Nature, not the 21st century, numbnuts) but all the evidence points to Types. Plural. As in, different people evolved to like different things. Human taste is irreducible to a single demo, like sex. In basic studies on body type, a simple measure, computerized, we can agree it’s empirical, men thought women like Muscle Man. Huge, hulking, high maintenance. To this day, men dare disagree with the findings, as if women don’t know what sexually appeals to them, as if you can gaslight an entire sex into finding what you have sexually attractive (an anti-evolution position), just like the fat acceptance feminists (‘tingles’ is also an inaccurate term, the brain codes for attraction, a physiological response isn’t vital/instant as it is with men, it’s projection for the weakness of their own body betraying their interests, like we care), and they go on to insist that their bulking of gainzzzz is actually about women, instead of signalling social desirability as a tribal member to other men (the homoeroticism upsets them). Watch the way they compliment each other at the gym. Watch them. Hella gay.

Notes

Spitting in someone’s face is illegal. It’s assault. It’s considered worse than, say, a punch, because it transmits disease. Sometimes ranked up to battery without actual contamination. It’s a filthy thing nobody in the First World should be forgiven for doing. Live in the Middle East, they do it all the time. Considering it’s usually done by men to women too weak to throw a punch, this would be an aggravating factor for sentencing as an act of misogyny, don’t take cues from porn, addicts. They’re paid to pretend they like bodily fluids.

Lynsey [1995] is the case law relevant to the UK.

Doing things because a girl wants you to is beta.

Changing everything about your life around what you think women think is omega.

Changing your actions because of what people might think of you isn’t manly.

Being a cad used to have a social cache because it was difficult and could get you run out of town or worse. Nowadays anyone can get laid if they drop their standards enough. The glory has gone. You go to the nearest American city and buy a cougar a drink at 2am. Casanova you ain’t.

This isn’t school, who cares about being cool anymore?

Anti-socials don’t have good social relations. Duh?

‘And it doesn’t matter if you try to conceal your cowardice by calling it “being a gentleman”‘ – Not the words of traditional men in support of a Patriarchy, where all the men are forced to be gents. When they say they support such things, it is a lie and again, signalling, because men who truly believe that wouldn’t treat their peers with open disdain.

Compare with: http://alphagameplan.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/when-gamma-reacts.html

“He is a coward and will abandon most everything to save his skin, and this fact gnaws on him internally. Being so narcissistic he is unable to imagine other people not being secret cowards so he will regularly talk of being brave and accuse others of being cowardly.”

They have jumped the shark.

red dwarf ace rimmer interior alligator surfing

Link: Kinsey, the r-types’ sexologist

The basis for the modern myths of sexuality, and informing the Sex Ed screwing up modern children.

The biggest myth being SEX IS ALWAYS GOOD. The core programming directive sounds odd spoken bare, doesn’t it?

Another being SEX IS A RIGHT WHATEVER YOUR AGE AND YOU CANNOT CONTROL YOURSELF/IT.  Reminiscent of a possession metaphor.

A third example being PERVERSIONS ARE NORMAL. Which is the opposite of statistical meanings of the word normal, he was trying to make them socially acceptable. All of them. Freud defined pansexuality and it means an attraction to everything (animals, children, corpses). Despite how modern neurobiology shows tastes in arousal are mutable by porn use, something they argued was impossible back then because they’re liars.

I’ve posted about Kinsey before. Search the tag.

http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/alfred-kinsey-child-sexuality-and-rabbitism/

Others followed in his criminal footsteps, notably Dr Money, the man who forced two brothers to engage in sex play and took photos…. and started this whole tranny mess.

Paper: Methods and Assumptions of Research in Behavioral Genetics

http://web.udl.es/usuaris/e4650869/genialitat.cat/continguts/Methods%20in%20Behavior%20Genetics.pdf

Mendelian is…. outdated. Dominant/recessive doesn’t work on the level of behavioural traits we observe, for the same reason there isn’t a “gene for X” as the papers declare, the interactions alone require a great deal of processing power and the outcomes will become clear over the coming decades.
But the gist in this is good.