White fever in half breeds

http://uncabob.blogspot.com/2016/10/high-yellow-half-breeds.html

“I’ve only met two women that I know of who were half-breeds. Both of them only slept with white guys.”

Stealing our men! (partial sarcasm)

Where did they get the right to invade European gene pools?

“The first was when I was 18 years old. She was 19, half-Indian (feather, not dot) and half-black and was raised on a reservation. She considered herself an Indian and referred to blacks as “them” and “they” and looked down on them.

Not surprisingly she only slept with white guys. I have no idea what happened to her but figured at the very least she had a child by a white man.

Also not surprisingly she hit on me. I knew the reason why: blond hair and blue eyes.

slags, they’re such slags in Asia they just hide it better

I guarantee you most Asian wives of White men are cheating on him, at least once. They got to the West, that was the goal. As long as it’s lighter, he’ll assume it’s his kid, right? Mixing men are generally stupid, they won’t get it tested.

Yet to see the IVF rates (uptake likelihood) but I suspect from the trend of C-sections and so on, they have difficulty conceiving (and carrying to term, biologically connected processes). Interventions suggest ill health and with old fathers, the risk goes up yet again.
I wonder if mixed race is less fertile in general or if it’s more one race than another they’re breeding with? What about two mixed race? Interesting questions science is too scared to answer, but I have looked into it. The study I saw, white Brit women in general were more fertile than South Asians. The study is tagged.

If there are medical problems, they have to admit it publicly to help them.

Everyone wants lighter kids.”

Imagine knowing on some level your spouse only wants you for a pigmentation gene.
Wow, that must be the worst.

“The second one was half-black and half-white and really was high-yellow. She also only slept with white guys and had a child by one, whom I once met and who had blue eyes (she also made more than one comment about my blue eyes).

[creeper alert!]

Her little girl was white. In two generations the family went from black to white.”

White passing isn’t white, genetics is real. Those genes still express in other areas including brain and they’re dominant too, throughout many generations, forever. They’ll still be the average of their parents, so shorter sons (shorter Asian genes, 4-5ft range) and stupid (maternal national IQ), likely fat daughters (father’s contribution). (Find a White-Asian mix who isn’t starving herself to look LA thin and consider the temperament, no wonder they become SJWs when the pressure cracks at college, mixed kids are mathematically more promiscuous).

Yeah, mixed race pretty much can only afford to date one another, so the white guys mixing yellow and bitching about Muh African Immigrants will likely have black grandkids or great-grandkids, it’s just statistical probability.

Nobody wants to tell them that it goes both ways?
Their kids will find other mixes attractive? And they can’t complain because they mixed too?

They don’t own their 18yo daughters like their wife. Consider the wife’s whore genetics to fuck a guy because he can upgrade her to the rich West. It won’t end well, I can’t wait for that shitshow.

PAY THE TOLL. THE OPIUM TOLL.

ask not for whom the bell tolls

it tolls for thee, cuckey

“People talk about things such as “yellow fever but I’ve never heard anyone talk about “white fever” except for those no-class blacks who go crazy around white meat, although they never use the term “white fever.” I mean non-white or part-white women who only desire white guys. They do exist.

I once encountered a black woman who basically told me, “If I have a kid by a black man the child will be black. Why should I do that when I can have a kid by a white man?””

The most calculating women because, once she’s had the kids, she doesn’t need the guy anymore.
Think about it. And white guys net more in divorce money too. These white mixers are being targeted, like Prince Harry, hilariously.
How many bitter divorced dude stories do you read in MRA forums? Well, did you assume the wife was white? That would be a mistake. You always check. If they get defensive, she was playing for the yellow tribe.

Their cultural loyalty is to wider Asian family, NOT one white man. Imagine when the markets suck again, will she throw hubby under the bus and cash out? You bet.

They’ll pressure her to.

Aw, but they wanted their obedient Mulan wife! Who’s brainwashed by Disney now?

I’ve never met a woman who expected a pumpkin to turn into a carriage but these guys think their penis can turn any Asian female into a fucking unicorn.

Can this be a condition? Penis stupidity? They’re not a magic wand, guys.

“MY waifu, what a beautiful long horn you have!”

[stabs in divorce court]

Logically, if they were so great, wouldn’t they be marrying the top crust of Asians? Seeing how we can’t perceive attractiveness accurately in other races, they usually married uggos and nobody has the heart to tell them.

Did they think she learned those sexual skills from other women? Even the infamous ugly girl’s skill in blowjob technique?

How many guys lose out in divorce proceedings because they’re white, not male? And still, they never get this?

“Some people think sooner or later we’ll all be mixed and turn into a mocha mess. That’s never going to happen.

White men are the most desired and Asian men and black women the least. I had an Asian woman tell me she couldn’t imagine an Asian man and a black woman together. White people are of the same opinion.”

White women mix out the least statistically but you wouldn’t know it by all the bitchy complaints about mud sharks, like that’s the only mixing going on. Sure, K.

Not covering for a guilty cuck conscience at all.

Tis better to have no children at all than shame thy ancestors with their enemies’ blood.

“Miscegenation used to be illegal. I know why. The children belong nowhere, at least the men.”

All the outcomes suggest terrible lives by comparison due to likely outbreeding depression but we need more data.

“There doesn’t appear to be much of a problem with mixed-breed women.”

Ha! They hide it!
It’s like tiger mom abuse. The kids hate them. Read the various blogs and forum posts hating their whore mother for hating their own Asian DNA.

“The women will be absorbed but the men won’t.”

Not by anyone of quality, like the mudsharks. Naturally, nobody will look at the 10 data in those couples but it’s a general finding that people who date out can’t afford to date in. And as soon as those guys lose the money pump in the next recession or whatever, they’ll get a nasty shock when they meet the real person they stupidly married.

Fake feminine women for fake masculine men, I love it!

Thank god they don’t marry non-narc people (both fetishists).

“I actually met the half-Indian and half-black woman when I was living in Santa Barbara and working in Isla Vista, just like Elliot Rodger, the NOWAG half-breed who went insane from lack of meaning, importance and community in his life and so slaughtered several people, starting with a couple of NOWAG Asian nerds, whom he dispatched hands-on with a knife. That’s a lot of half-breed self-hate.”

Psychiatric problems, it’s probably because mixing brain genes is like oil/water between races.
Elliot actually hated white people and especially white women, it wasn’t actually about women in general if you read some of his stuff, he was obsessed about race and how he couldn’t ever be white (racial Pinocchio). The biggest cucks marry Asians, think Zuck. It’s just a fact, they want a woman with the body (pelvic width) of a small boy, that’s pure r-selection. That guy doesn’t have options. It’s a virtue signal though, so they take it with both hands! Then they can self-hate other whites without being called a cuck (spotted ya). Asians are natural SJWs, it’s the collectivism genes. In trying to avoid moderately critical white SJWs (easily done) they’ve jumped from the frying pan into the fire. Men are nothing in Asia, the grandmothers run it. The angry, hostile, abusive grandmothers.

I can’t wait for the show to start on the massive raft of divorces for something like “white privilege” when the white guy just lost a load of money and waifu needs her Gucci to impress her friends over cocktails. So trad!

http://uncabob.blogspot.com/2015/12/sticky-asian-women-and-white-men-truth.html

Awkward red pill.
“My father was borderline-autistic, unable to make eye contact, and saw Asian women as a “replacement white woman” when he was unable to get a white woman; my mother saw his blue eyes and height and saw him as a ticket to integration and higher status in her new life in the west.”

How is that not a whore?

Men rejecting masculinity

Alt title: men rejecting their gender role (then blaming women).
https://www.mercatornet.com/above/view/apatheism-is-more-damaging-to-christianity-than-atheism-and-antitheism/21642

“More nuanced and incisive rebuttals, such as Edward Feser’s The Last Superstition and David Bentley Hart’s Atheist Delusions, somehow never quite achieved the same recognition.”

cabal

“The questions and debates engaged in by the new atheists were often reductive, emotionalized and glib, but one does have to grant that they at least tackled the great questions of faith in their way.”

All redditfags do is strawman and pretend to be House on social questions while their own lives are miserable bachelorhoods full of porn and video games. It’s like church ladies self-congratulating.

Yeah, in spite of mathematical certainty, they’re all 130+ and can’t spell or compose a sentence for shit. O.K.

The only way they feel good about themselves is crusaderism, finding a “sinner” and making them feel bad or stressed e.g. Christians.

“Its supporters soon tired of tedious and repetitive debates,

with their navel

and they began to argue with each other about social justice and political correctness.”

And failed, clue.

Nothing they say is original. They’re multicultural monstrosities.

“The answer lies in the grey zone between believers and atheists.

no?

If you want to find the real wolf steering sheep away from the flock, look not to fedora-bedecked atheists, but to your average apatheist.”

No, hedonist. They pay lip service to virtue to continue a life of vice, massive cognitive dissonance.
You are not special, broflakes. This is not a special thing worthy of a snowflake term.
e.g. they will say all men should be married, and refuse to get married. Idiots.
They will say all men do better in the military and call the draft “sexist” (like evolution didn’t happen).
Women are weak but should magically overpower any male attacker with kung fu grip (but hitting a man is sexist).
They will know about atheist sub-fertility and refuse to be religious because they think it’s beneath them, a status signal, and again, they’re avoiding patriarchal standards i.e. no manwhoring, no carousing, no drugs, no lechery, actual standards of historical masculine virtue.
They don’t want to grow up or can’t (emotionally regressed). Peter Pan spent all his time “having fun” and dodging responsibility.
The idea of being a gentleman or “respectable” is something they dismiss out of hand with another mis-label, cuck.
No, a cuck is someone who rejects tradition and history in their own life while verbally going on (and on and on…) about its importance, they’re cuckservatives hoping to freeload off the backs of real men’s hard work. For thee but not for me. They’re worthless humans, if they won’t contribute they should emigrate. They’d actually take a class on Penis Studies (Man Studies) because they’re so mind-numbingly boring (predictable, all on the same diet, same clothes, same haircut, same reading material across borders, like a cult of dull) and lacking in individuality.

They’ll say men should be providers – and refuse to provide even for themselves (a mantrum) and worse, defend deadbeats!
Cowardly r-types.

“It’s okay when we do it” hypocrites. They’re socialists who self-loathe in different ways. An abortion clinic on every corner and whore pills in every 13yo girl’s hands would be alright by them! Moral relativists. “Social liberal, economic conservative” cucks. All the gibs, as long as someone else pays.

You can only strike from your gender role if you were competent enough to have ever achieved it.

They reject their gender role, like male SJWs, in favour of materalism, atheistic hedonism (acting like an animal). It’s the exact same thing.
In their own ideal society, they’d be rejects!
Nihilism in the pomo sense of the word is the belief system of losers, it’s their cover for postmodernism while pretending to be oh-so different (special) from the SJWs (narcissism of small differences).
Even this article’s like “this is a new and special thing”.
No? It’s just that we notice because dueling is illegal (otherwise their lip would get them shot by a real man) and they can’t be cannon fodder without an overt war. This is what happens in the dysgenic situation when you let the Low IQ males with delusions of superiority (a self-proclaimed penis pass, if you will, on all sin) run their whining mouth about how, in the most spoiled society ever, they’re still abject failures! Oh, poor baby in your air conditioned palace on welfare! It must be so hard!
Their failure isn’t society’s fault, it’s a character fault and on the contrary, the ones bitching online are exclusively reared in the middle-class (they had advantages).

They have no excuse.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/09/19/middle-class-white-male-memes/

If a meme about a spoiled suburbanite Prince stereotype offends you…. it should.

Shame is GOOD.

Their slide down the social mobility scale is a sign the system works. You aren’t entitled to a better life than your parents unless you work at least as hard (complaining isn’t work).

I’d know.

9/10 they’re actually nagging. But they do nothing themselves. Only nag. We have male shrews! They expect the rest of us will step in like their helicopter parents. You’re an adult, we owe you nothing.

The Boomers are right about the entitled ones. It just happens to be the hippy kids.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/the-anti-spanking-initiative-is-r-selected/

Nagging only works if you’re bound i.e. parents, marriage. Nagging society doesn’t wash and given the advantages men have on many levels (that they deny “male privilege is a myth” when they seek to evade responsibility or champion with hyperbole “men are superior biologically” to signal, both when it’s convenient, like we don’t notice), they don’t have an excuse that blames women e.g. when boys lose out on math tests and other schoolwork, it’s because they study less around the time they discover porn. Asians can’t watch that stuff all day, look at their grades, it isn’t “all men”, it’s all degenerate men who make poor lifestyle choices. So they want a meritocratic system – but only when it leads to positive outcomes for themselves (liars).

If someone works harder than you, they deserve to beat you! Add up hours studied and you’ll find female (and male) conscientiousness isn’t bias, they activate with their IQ the traits which help them. The guy or girl “winging it” the night before deserves to fail*. Low IQ don’t have the IQ to know what they’re NOT doing! That isn’t everyone else’s fault! If there are systemic forces against men in some fields, the same must be true of women in other fields because that is how systems work, ya dummies!

Otherwise it’s like saying there’s north without south or taste without those tacky cheese squares at the other end of the spectrum. Logic is consistent! Smart men address the topic of stupid men – until they’re shouted down as “sexist” (???), like smart women.

It just so happens by nature that there are more lazy men! So yeah, they fail! Confound!

You cannot ignore the left half of the bell curve, men overpopulate it!

They’ve simply never survived in these numbers before because responsibility is the new leprosy in a decadent West. It makes a lot of sense actually. No prior society (that didn’t collapse) ever had to tolerate this much stupid and it shows.

If we live in clown world, send in the clowns…

War is like sexual selection, it’s a good thing that keeps the bad genes down. The modern world is like adding shit to the pool so it doesn’t feel excluded.
It turns out you don’t need to sterilize irresponsible people, just give them a free sex doll on condition they never have children (or they’d be aborted). We could solve this in two generations if we stopped listening to their “feelings” (they don’t have feelings, relativists, they only ramble and screech).

Seriously, hand them sexbots on condition of no kids to inflict on the future world (and no sex crimes, because apparently their hand wasn’t as big as their ego). They’re genetic suicides anyway, that or move them (could be cheaper) to a literal Pleasure Island with no internet (no corrupting the outside world) and they can never leave (I figured Westworld was about this, a brothel prison with no victims, would’ve been cooler). They’d OD in about a week without the nanny state. Actually, a literal death camp could work very simply: press lever 1 for food or 2 for heroin. Technically, it’s suicide. Dummies are predictably hedonic.

*They’ve been told it’s important for literally over a decade. You can lead a horse to water. Education is wasted on the lazy and stupid, and they’re the same people. That’s Dunning-Kruger. They’re blind to what they’re missing because they’re missing it!

They cannot see past their ego to anything, including Pascal’s Wager. Again, deny and dismiss, typical cuck.
The destructive person (antisocial to society) telling you you deserve to be destroyed (like an SJW) because society sucks unless it’s sucking them off (but it isn’t their job to fix it?)… boys who weren’t raised with real discipline have no shame (sociopath trait). They’ve been allowed to get away with ruining themselves and remaining psychologically as teenagers.

It’s just the dysgenic men too proud to become blatant SJWs. 

Actually worse than SJWs, wow. They’d sell their grandma for a porn star.

You can’t sympathize with people who hate you and your people.
There’s the obvious traitor and the sneaky little shits who under-mine attempts to make things better for everyone because the gap to their own life would become greater. Fifth Column is worse.

Why won’t women be right wing?

Because you date and marry the slutty Lefties.

Reinforcement, look it up. Women will become whatever gets them the wedding, as much as I hate to say it. What men actually, actively decide to prefer becomes the norm. Where’s the incentive to be anything other than a fat, ugly slut when you’ll get the guy who pretends to have principles anyway? Meanwhile, laughing at him behind his back. They really think these women respect them. They treat their man’s right-wing politics like a parent treats their kid’s crappy crayon drawing and make no bones about telling everyone they ever met (I have heard the long-suffering rants) how silly and crazy he is. Look at her expression. Note the regular piggish features further warped by sneering contempt. When she eventually burns him (probably in divorce, biggest predictor is contempt) he’ll blame all women… when this was totally r/K. He made a shitty decision and shitty things will happen. Men have 100% selection power in who they ask out and propose to, and selection is most of what makes a marriage a success or failure.
The cucking right brings shame on us all. If you can stand to tolerate that shit tier of human being, let alone love it, don’t pretend to be so hardcore.

Sex is deliberately the bait, the one thing they have to attract good quality men and you’re still falling for it? What kind of red pill is that? They have nothing else to offer but these guys are so deluded they assume she’ll change her mind or dating won’t become marriage and kids. “30 is not the new 20”, never date shitty people.

You think women don’t notice?

Families used to have to filter out slutty women from marriage considerations because yes, men are really that dumb (Defoe bitched about it!). They will ruin their whole family and entire line for endorphin pumps. We forget arranged marriages restricted men too, and also to protect them from their own stupidity. The divorce rate is largely the fault of men thinking that lust matches are somehow smarter.

The manosphere falls on deaf ears or mockery because it claims men can be ruined by women… except they’re not actually “ruined” (way to sound like a dunce, contradict yourself)…. and somehow women can’t be ruined by men, ever. Lies to evade guilt.

Men vindicate the worst women by approving them in how they behave. Every “man” is nice to the sluts hoping to get a leg over. So for fifty years, more sluts. It isn’t shallow to want to be treated nicely, that’s a big thing for women. Sluts are treated now, how ladies used to be treated. Stop paying attention to the sluts (shaming works but isn’t necessary) and younger women will notice.

Then there’s how fake right-wingers treat the good women:

“Let’s talk to all women like whores! …Why do they hate me?”

Basic dignity?

R-types using the word cuck are my fetish

The eternal ‘r’…
If they can’t fuck it, they don’t understand its function. They’re desperate animals.
I once heard of a man: “he would fuck a tortoise if he could hold it still long enough.”
A gay guy said this. You know it’s bad when a homosexual thinks you’re fucking around too much.
These ‘unhappy family‘ posts are trying really hard to sell the bachelor lifestyle of loneliness, which just so happens to reduce the birth rate and to leave many single, desperate women.
Don’t breed goyim.
Family will make you miserable.
Do not look at the pro-natal Israeli policies.

Video: not an argument

People miss how beautiful that expression is. However, in specific cases, they should be able to break it down precisely why or they themselves have no reply, no argument, simply an assertion.
You have no requirement to answer a non-question, it’s a habit of socializing that we speak upon the completion of a sentence, it doesn’t require that sentence have merit. The Burden of Proof rests on the initial speaker, still.

Yet it can’t be used to outright deny or dismiss without having a specific reason why.


Meanwhile, the only way to effectively deal with r-types, ignore them, however loudly they scream.

See Best Post.


You only protect your own, but they have made it clear they are against you. Don’t lift a finger.
They say strength is bad until they want you to use it on their behalf.

Hey, if they’re so strong without their weapons, if their arguments have the same calibre as a bullet, go right on ahead and let them stand independently, you oppressive shitlord, and die that way if necessary. It’s what they would’ve wanted.

If evil imports evil, what is there to save?

Yourself, is the answer to that question.

Self-interest is rational. Pathological altruism is insanity.
You help those who would help you, the other side of the golden rule. Darwin’s rules. Sacrifice for people who would sacrifice you is patriotism dialed up to the incredible level of a cartoon character.

I swear most of Molly’s job is talking down the autistic from their pedestal of self-righteous stupidity.
If anyone deserves the Rasputin treatment, it’s a terrorist. Thankfully, your taxes go to pay people with guns already. The Parliament attacker guy? Shot, if memory serves, by a white guy with glasses. In a country that stupidly restricted guns. Even we don’t need you, Gun Bro. If the State can’t do the basic thing of shooting the bad guys for us…

I’ve never, ever heard of a liberal defending a conservative from any attack, ever.
Anyone?
They are not like you. They do not like you. Partially because you would defend them, implicitly stating they’re too weak to do it themselves. If you respect them as adults, leave them be. Let them live (and die) free. You are not their precious State, you have no duty to them, you are not getting paid, that is not your job ~z-snap~. You can’t play hero to two villains. They have engineered this setup on purpose. By importing violent left-wingers, they get the distraction to sneak off (reward of cowardice: survival) and the claim to victory (reward of victory). They literally do not lose.

If they don’t value their own safety, why should you?
America is too diverse to be united. You have the Diverse States of America.

He’s wrong about signalling (thinking) as a sign of tribe. Anyone can signal, its value is nil. How many of those diverse callers would help him, if he needed it? The odds are against, aren’t they? There are plenty of r-types signalling K as the idea spreads to new groups and creeps into mainstream awareness. The other day I heard a random cafe-owner say, “I want to protect this country, I’m like a wolf.” R-types invade by signalling. It’s a social invasion, they’re the fifth column, the barbarians sacking Rome from the inside, a swarm of locusts crying out as they hit you. History has taught us the hard way that ideological unity comes from genetic homogeneity.
The culture war is one of ideas. The weapon is a meme. A tiny little piece of information, a snippet of truth.

Signallers are, more often than not, liars.

They signal whatever ‘virtue’ is powerful, hoping for scraps from that table.

They are the begging dogs of society, asking you to hunt for them. It’s like every time Roosh calls for “someone! do something!” and his little internet boyfriends scurry to rescue the damsel and White Knights whatever he asks for. What are you, his wife? At least “think of the children!” defends the helpless. Adults have no business defending other adults. They rise and fall on their own merit, raised or dashed on their own petard.
K-society says: They do it themselves or it doesn’t get done.
R-society? It’s very espionage, ultra deceptive.
They offer you friendship while holding a knife in their other hand. They extend an olive branch first because it’s less effort, not because they like you or believe in the healing power of metaphor. There is a bargain they author, that you never asked for, and if you don’t like it, the carrot, they’ll ‘offer’ the stick. This is called a con. Con artists rely on confidence and trust. Virtue signallers rely on confidence and trust…

They want control over you, that is their power, to wiggle you like a little puppet.

In a victim culture, they are the biggest victims. In a K-shift, they are magically K-leaning.
Occam says: It’s all a lie.

I warned you, years ago. I knew these interlopers would pop up like fleas.
They don’t mind you dancing the right-wing jig as long as it’s to their exact tune.

Guess which is which.

If your friends are your enemies, you’ll never succeed. How to test?

A k-type invented the expression: actions speak louder than words. Until I see you sacrifice for this tribe, it owes nothing to you. If all you have are words, speak to the birds.

Just because someone is smoke-signalling your tribe doesn’t mean they’re on your side. Indeed, this makes it less likely, a friend doesn’t feel the need to keep reminding you they’re not a foe, not a threat, like they’re anticipating something…

DO NOT TRUST A DODGY SIGNAL.

The incongruence should ping to you. What’s in it for you?

In the super-complex theories of strategy, this is called A Trap. It’s a primitive form of distraction by claiming Ally while wearing the coat of your enemy to cuckold him for whatever reason before attacking when factors are on your side and you can turn your coat back and show your true colours. This is the problem with games like chess, where the colours never change sides because they were bribed or got bored. You never get betrayed in chess because the enemy never falters and it’s all very polite and open, two equal lines fairly opposing one another with Queensberry rules. That was 2nd generation warfare, we’re on four. Then again, maybe it’s a commentary on the reality that a leopard can’t change its spots. Who knows? I certainly don’t.

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/226350.html
“Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.”
They don’t fully quote it for some strange reason. The Bible is actually very witty.

Ask – why do they want your trust? Why aren’t they doing literally anything else? What’s their game? 

It’s a great way to buy time when you know you’d lose in a fair fight.

aka cheating

If this was the 15th century, a ship running up your flag is probably pirates.

And they won’t kill you with rum.

Newsflash: BAD GUYS LIE. THEY LIE OR THEY WON’T FOOL YOU LONG ENOUGH TO WIN.

Back to terrorism. All the way back, centuries and centuries and centuries, like the ideas.

Self-proclaimed liberals have a lot in common with the mythological ‘moderate Muslim’; that is to say, they will claim to be loving and giving until they have power and numbers to be the opposite of those things.

The ‘American Indian’ only gave with the expectation of receiving more in future.

A liberal is a dictator waiting to happen. Biding their time until everyone else has disarmed and made nice.
They know exactly what they are doing. That is what guys like these do not get. Everyone else is slowly waking up. We make memes.

comment
“So if I’m understanding Stefan’s argument correctly it is: “While you certainly have the right to defend yourself, you have zero obligation to defend anyone else against a threat.” Is that the argument you are taking issue with? If so, what is your counterargument? If there is an obligation to defend others where does it come from?”
They want all conservatives to rush to protect them, like the police. While we are occupied, they survive and screw over the next batch of rueful idiots. The type who, at the Gates of Saint Peter, would claim the moral victory is more important.
The self-styled ‘liberals’ scoff at loyalty to children, nuclear family and country… until it comes to discussions of noblesse oblige (without class???), pensions, the social contract and human rights (without property rights). Then it’s all about universalism, collectivism and helping those who can’t/won’t help themselves. They are morally relative, liberal with logic ….wrong, in bad faith (100% deliberate). What they say is usually ‘not an argument’ because it comes from a hypocrite (no-proof), a deceiver (valid use, not ad hominem) and they argue it from bad faith, really pushing something else entirely under the radar.

They are loyal to their own body, especially the neck. They don’t want to save the pandas, they want to save their own skin.

In common speech here, they’re ‘trying it on’ i.e. they know they’re lying to get what they want and disappear when their half comes due, but they’re hoping you don’t know that.

All their virtue signals are overt pleas to get, without giving. 

Argument and clause. Devil and detail. Plan and plot.

Essentially it’s;
>HELP THE OUTGROUP! THE INDIVIDUAL IS NOTHING TO THE GROUP! SACRIFICE AT ALL COSTS!
>…STOP DEFINING THE INGROUP! THAT MODEL IS REDUNDANT AND EVIL!
and that, my friends, is why we mock them.
See: Why mockery?

It is also why you shouldn’t trust ambassadors. 300 was right.

That diverse cast of people calling into Molyneux are attempting to appease him while he gains power (they smell a whiff and cannot yet crush him) and then to advise him to his destruction once he has gained it (and after they have gained his trust). That is what high-IQ r-types DO. The toxic friends of the world. The fairweather traitors and degenerate preachers.

Clinically, they have many names. Sociopath tops the list.

Question a normal person: #crickets

Question a sociopath: you are (lie), (lie) and (lie), evil person! Appease me! Account for your sin!

They’ve found a scapegoat to slaughter.

Sociopaths especially detest those who describe their tactics to the masses for protection.

You can’t defame the truth, though, can you?

The male c-word: CUCK

I’ve been waiting to do this post for a while. Biding my time. OK, let’s go.Even better, give them a pitying look and smirk no matter what they say.

Heavy on meme. Short on brain.

shitposthistory

arcuck

It isn’t the fetish. It refers to a brand of traitorous self-proclaimed conservatives that don’t even talk the talk. A milquetoast inefficiency born of fear of disapproval. An ideological traitor but fence-sitter and desperate people-pleaser. They will betray their ingroup to please the outgroup that will never accept them, and they know this.

A peculiar kind of betrayal charaterised by ingroup loathing, as opposed to self-loathing. In fact, all they care for is reputation, being densely narcissistic.

Cuckservatism: Seeking approval from other (usually liberal) men like they’re your wife.

Example? Exhibit A:

cuckproof

cuckchicken

Yes, that’s the reason. Some of you may remember my use of this meme.

It has nothing to do with the paraphilia, it’s the sound a chicken makes.

It’s the male c-word because it attacks the inconsolable male weakness: cowardice.
This is intentional. It precisely targets their masculinity, since they push androgyny.
It points out their non-traditional sexual practices, for mockery. As manwhores.
This is intentional.
Obviously I knew this but I question how many others do?
Technically, the first man I called a cuck was Roosh. I don’t think he got it.

It’s psyops. It attacks their lifestyle.

By comparison, ‘cunt’ attacks the source of femininity and female power. It doesn’t really work unless you hate women. What’s so bad about having one? Men go into debt to rent one.
Everyone hates a skeeze and a traitor. They don’t care for truth but for selfish profit. They signal altruism but sell your future down the river, counting your shekels.

carrlthecuck

cuckecheese cuckfb cuckglenn cuckhappen

It relies on a tropism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_faith#Psychology

“While self-deception may be a tropism, not consciously done, it may be guided by “projects” one may set for one’s life, such as a desire for personal pleasure, wealth, power, or to get into heaven”

cuckles cuckonme

‘a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’

cuckreddit

We’ve been cucking for political parties for years, I simply pointed it out.
Fetish secondary definition: Voting for them while they screw us.

cucktales cucktrump everyoneisacuck

nowisnotthetime

wordofday

altrightrobot

To be perfectly frank, I’m surprised it spread this far.
I just thought the chicken anime thing was funny.

I suppose it demonstrates the finer principles of ‘why mockery?’ I discussed.
The truth won’t get a cuck’s attention. All they care about is reputation. Tell the truth about that, and he’ll listen to you. We keep using insults in circulation because they work.

I never thought pigs were the appropriate metaphor for bad men. Chickens.
Bland and annoying.

Well, there we are.

Finally.

Bonus question: in the original yodel video, it sounds like he’s saying another meme.
Which one could it be?

weareallshitpostershere

I recently became a meme so I’m trying to restore my meme karma.