Why are so many Jews sadists?
Claire Bronfman is jewish and heiress of her late father’s Edgar Bronfman’s Seagram’s liquor fortune (6) and according to reports she is the most brutal and sadistic figure in the entire of NXIVM. (7)
Why are so many Jews sadists?
Claire Bronfman is jewish and heiress of her late father’s Edgar Bronfman’s Seagram’s liquor fortune (6) and according to reports she is the most brutal and sadistic figure in the entire of NXIVM. (7)
“Illusory truth effect” wasn’t invented by (((academics))).
“The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.”
Oh, the irony of Nazi propaganda whitewashed for socialism.
And used to call others Nazis.
For Hitler’s Big Lie, no less.
“The expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously”.
Crediting people in academia is important.
“According to Hitler, the “big lie” was a propaganda technique typically used by Jewish Marxists.”
Patently false, they say.
Where have they done that?
This is why you can show PC people all sorts of factual evidence to the contrary and they’re still thick, it really is like a cult. State ‘education’ cult. How many years do you need? One day historians will show all the PC adverts in our media like we see Soviet stuff now.
[They’re scared to show us most Nazi propaganda because they’ve ripped it off again for the present.]
Actually, a propaganda MOOC about modern PC propaganda would be amazing.
This is why slander’s illegal, by the way. On an individual level, repetition for gossip does damage.
The way to actually get the brainwashed to snap out of it is allow questions, increase dissonance and apply consequences for being deluded.
Big Brother is only going to ask you ONCE:
Which is the straight line?
This is why we should’ve kept the old asylums open.
“Asch (1951) devised what is now regarded as a classic experiment in social psychology, whereby there was an obvious answer to a line judgment task. If the participant gave an incorrect answer it would be clear that this was due to group pressure.”
Do you believe in genetics, the evolution of sexual dimorphism or equalism and conformity?
Future cult researchers will have a field day with this attempted breach of reality.
Thought Prison was right. This won’t end.
Breaking a person isn’t a big thing requiring waterboarding and chains.
It’s very subtle and small. You force them to publicly lie to themselves, to say something they know isn’t true and believe it. This miniature psychosis causes future dissonance, they’ll go on to deny things before their very eyes without intervention.
If you can get them to lie ONCE, just once, they’re yours forever.
SJWs aren’t to be mocked as stupid or pitied, they’re psyops.
They dress like useless idiots so you under-estimate them.
If they turned up in suits, you’d know it was a conformity test.
It’s so blatant I bet 100% of them never figured it out.*
You’ll always need his opinion, no other psychiatrist online and certainly not your own opinion.
Identify with something with no agency, an external conscience and wood for brains.
*Below a conscious level.
He knows that.
How to spot a cult leader?
After years, men immersed in his materials are more dependent. On him.
Well, the first time I saw the Disney videos I laughed because since MK Ultra became well known, surely people aren’t that stupid?
I said to myself “I’m not a puppet, there are no strings on me”.
Unless you accept his, of course. Isn’t that the point?
Really, undeniable on this count.
Why doesn’t he mention Svengalis, given the material?
And a long monologue on Pleasure Island but omitting the subject of male, life-ruining vice? HOW?
Like PI isn’t a “den of iniquity”? Why not mention the vice? Why omit what should be passing censure?
Pinocchio was totally selfish, wanting his cake (a good life) and eating it (but being a bad person) . The plot took away the ass’s ears but IRL, there is no magic and certain things cannot be undone, having a personal deserved reputation as an ass publicly brands you for life, as it should. He doesn’t mention CONSEQUENCES in a story about morality and maturity.
He wouldn’t dare do an hour-plus video on Peter Pan, his followers would kill him.
They’re too weak to ask the hard questions.
All I see is ten minute hints. WEAK.
Dorian Gray would be a laughriot.
Note the emphasis on meditation if you look cult by cult (this is in the BITE model).
It switches off critical thinking.
Trust nobody who touts meditation, it’s a trance state.
Confession is also unholy, it’s blasphemy to think man can forgive your sins.
Prayer is silent because God won’t blackmail you.
It’s bizarre how many cult tactics remind me of state schooling.
Replace group/leader with curriculum.
BTW, they recently started encouraging meditation.
Some places push hypnosis.
Plenty of things you learn at school are blatant lies.
There are obvious political biases.*
You’re punished for knowing more than the teacher/priest.
*Then again, Guardian readers need to be told what to think, so it’s the blind leading the blind.
If prevented from reading it, they’d have no opinion.
This is so r-selected it’s staggering.
A guy shows up and says property should be abolished, he should be treated like a King though, and women should be forced into marriage with violent adulterers (bigamists) who wanted a ‘legal’ form of Red Army rape because something something ‘love’.
The cage the monstrous leaders’ corpses were kept in is still up in Munster, good riddance.
“Soon Jan Matthys himself arrived, a tall, gaunt man with a long black beard. Matthys, aided by Bockelson, quickly became the virtual dictator of the town. The coercive Anabaptists had at last seized a city. The Great Communist Experiment could now begin.”
“Matthys called therefore for the execution of all remaining Catholics and Lutherans, but Knipperdollinck’s cooler head prevailed, since he warned Matthys that slaughtering all other Christians than themselves might cause the rest of the world to become edgy, and they might all come and crush the New Jerusalem in its cradle.
It was therefore decided to do the next best thing, and on February 27 the Catholic and Lutherans were driven out of the city, in the midst of a horrendous snowstorm.
Ah! The Russian method.
In a deed prefiguring communist Cambodia, all non-Anabaptists, including old people, invalids, babies and pregnant women were driven into the snowstorm,
Socialists do care – about themselves.
The grasshopper should’ve been left to starve in the story.
and all were forced to leave behind all their money, property, food and clothing. The remaining Lutherans and Catholics were compulsorily rebaptized, and all refusing this ministration were put to death.”
I think we’ll have to bring this back, the cage method.
You can see they deserved it.
“With every person drafted for siege work, Jan Matthys launched his totalitarian communist social revolution.
The first step was to confiscate the property of the expelled. All their worldly goods were placed in central depots, and the poor were encouraged to take “according to their needs,” the “needs” to be interpreted by seven appointed “deacons” chosen by Matthys.”
“When a blacksmith protested at these measures imposed by Dutch foreigners, Matthys arrested the courageous smithy. Summoning the entire population of the town, Matthys personally stabbed, shot, and killed the “godless” blacksmith”
Foreigners with a sense of entitlement.
Thank god we learned our lesson.
Multiculturalism is just a slow invasion.
“A key part of the Anabaptist reign of terror in Münster was now unveiled. Unerringly, just as in the case of the Cambodian communists four-and-a-half centuries later, the new ruling elite realized that the abolition of the private ownership of money would reduce the population to total slavish dependence on the men of power. And so Matthys, Rothmann and others launched a propaganda campaign that it was unchristian to own money privately; that all money should be held in “common,” which in practice meant that all money whatsoever must be handed over to Matthys and his ruling clique.”
Banks, we call them banks.
Strangely, they are run by a religion. Must be a coincidence.
“Food was confiscated from private homes, and rationed according to the will of the government deacons. Also, to accommodate the immigrants, all private homes were effectively communized, with everyone permitted to quarter themselves anywhere; it was now illegal to close, let alone lock, doors.
No such thing as burglary.
Communal dining-halls were established, where people ate together to readings from the Old Testament.
This compulsory communism and reign of terror was carried out in the name of community and Christian “love.””
White Sharia has already happened. For similar, low IQ reasons, it also failed.
There’s a reason nobody trusts missionaries.
They’re invaders holding a book, that isn’t better.
As you can see, it’s often much worse.
“All this communization was considered the first giant steps toward total egalitarian communism, where, as Rothmann put it, “all things were to be in common, there was to be no private property and nobody was to do any more work, but simply trust in God.” The workless part, of course, somehow never arrived.”
(((Wow))) imagine my shock. And iPhones would rain from the Heavens!
“everything which offends against love – all such things are abolished amongst us by the power of love and community.”
Anyone who tries to sell you on giving them power over you for weasel words like ‘love’ and ‘community’ is a dictator waiting to happen.
Tolerance is a sin, the Bible never tells you to tolerate evil, quite the opposite.
Outlawing “working for money” is intended to increase dependence.
Like unpaid internships and universal basic income today (and the welfare cliff).
Contrary to the God helps those who help themselves logic of the Bible, which didn’t see money as evil, merely love of it and greed at the expense of rights. Making tax-collectors and bankers Satan?
“For the Anabaptists boasted of their lack of education, and claimed that it was the unlearned and the unwashed who would be the elect of the world.”
“Early in May, Bockelson caught the attention of the town by running naked through the streets in a frenzy, falling then into a silent three-day ecstasy.”
Oh, to see that amygdala. Then the other immigrant friend takes over after Jan.
The first sexual revolution / religious rape / free love fest:
“The elders were now given total authority over the life and death, the property and the spirit, of every inhabitant of Münster. A strict system of forced labour was imposed, with all artisans not drafted into the military now public employees, working for the community for no monetary reward. This meant, of course, that the guilds were now abolished.
No work > Forced labour.
The totalitarianism in Münster was now complete. Death was now the punishment for virtually every independent act, good or bad. Capital punishment was decreed for the high crimes of murder, theft, lying, avarice, and quarreling!
Notable exception: rape.
That’s how you spot the rabbit.
Also death was decreed for every conceivable kind of insubordination: the young against their parents, wives against their husbands and, of course, anyone at all against the chosen representatives of God on earth, the totalitarian government of Münster. Bernt Knipperdollinck was appointed high executioner to enforce the decrees.
Interfering with family life? Doesn’t sound like the socialist teachers we know.
The only aspect of life previously left untouched was sex, and this now came under the hammer of Bockelson’s total despotism. The only sexual relation permitted was marriage between two Anabaptists. Sex in any other form, including marriage with one of the “godless,” was a capital crime. But soon Bockelson went beyond this rather old-fashioned credo, and decided to establish compulsory polygamy in Münster.
City-wide Communist immigrant-led gang rape. And it didn’t just happen one New Year’s Eve.
Which the Red Army would also replicate in Germany, centuries later. Except you get creepy guys idolizing Russia to this day and never mentioning that literal rape of Europe.
I’m sure they rationalized polygamy (really rape and adultery) as Christian duty (as if their bodies were property of the state) despite how the Bible expressly tells us not to marry.
Since many of the expellees had left their wives and daughters behind,
Münster now had three times as many marriageable women as men, so that polygamy had become technologically feasible.
Rabbits wait until most good men are war-dead (The Sexual Revolution happened after World Wars) or poor and desperate to make ends meet then make their move to take the women. By force. How omega.
R-types are just rapists waiting for an opening, a weakness in the native Ks. First they say “don’t defend your women” then it’s “your women?” They fail as husbands and fathers (they can’t even satisfy one wife and are permissive parents). Don’t trust so-called polygamists, usually they don’t believe in an age of consent – or, when given power, consent itself…
Bockelson converted the other rather startled preachers by citing polygamy among the patriarchs of Israel, as well as by threatening dissenters with death.
Won’t let us rape your daughter? Guess we’ll have to make her an orphan.
Basic principle of tribal war. All war being tribal.
Compulsory polygamy was a bit too much for many of the Münsterites, who launched a rebellion in protest. The rebellion, however, was quickly crushed and most of the rebels put to death.
Along with their conscience.
Execution was also the fate of any further dissenters. And so by August 1534, polygamy was coercively established in Münster.
He raped the city itself, ironic.
As one might expect, young Bockelson took an instant liking to the new regime, and before long he had a harem of 15 wives, including Divara, the beautiful young widow of Jan Matthys.
Bros before what now?
Typical r loyalty.
Anyone who wants a “harem” is basically announcing to the world they’re a rapist.
If all those women wanted to sleep with them, they already would be, by consent, and they wouldn’t want a harem, that kills their ‘lovers’ for leaving.
Remember, Genghis Khan was a very successful rapist.
So-called “conquerors” are the most anti-male icons going, that was some other man’s daughter, sister, wife, mother. Sex traitors.
The rest of the male population also began to take to the new decree as ducks to water. Many of the women did not take as kindly to the new dispensation, and so the elders passed a law ordering compulsory marriage for every women under (and presumably also over) a certain age, which usually meant being a compulsory third or fourth wife.
Rape gangs writing the law.
Thank god we know better now.
Moreover, since marriage among the godless was not only invalid but also illegal, the wives of the expellees now became fair game, and were forced to “marry” good Anabaptists.
This is why you shoot deserters. If they’d betray their country and flee, what right do they have to come back to this?
Refusal to comply with the new law was punishable, of course, by death, and a number of women were actually executed as a result. Those “old” wives who resented the new wives coming into their household were also suppressed, and their quarreling was made a capital crime. Many women were executed for quarreling.
Anyone trying to shut up women is going to censor men too.
But the long arm of the state could reach only just so far and, in their first internal setback, Bockelson and his men had to relent, and permit divorce.
Polygamists are always for easy divorce and multiple re-marriage.
Actually re-marriage is the way they’re hoping to lube society up for it.
Because it isn’t a meaningful, loving commitment unless you can get out of it. And into it. And out. And shake it all about.
Indeed, the ceremony of marriage was now outlawed totally,
and divorce made very easy. As a result, Münster now fell under a regime of what amounted to compulsory free love. And so, within the space of only a few months, a rigid puritanism had been transmuted into a regime of compulsory promiscuity.”
This is what happens if you leave r-selected men in charge.
Chaos. Degenerate chaos. Learn from this lesson of history.
When the SJWs complain about male rule being violent, unfair and incompetent, they refer to r-men. The narcissism of small differences.
“Jan Bockelson seized this opportunity to carry his “egalitarian” communist revolution one step further: he had himself named king and Messiah of the Last Days.”
The Old and New Testaments were specifically written so we’d know to kill these little-dicked despots.
“It often happens with “egalitarians” that a hole, a special escape hatch from the drab uniformity of life, is created – for themselves.”
Communism for all! Except Party members – luxuries for them.
Rule by rapists.
“As soon as he proclaimed the monarchy, the prophet Dusentschur announced a new divine revelation: all who persisted in disagreeing with or disobeying King Bockelson would be put to death, and their very memory blotted out. They would be extirpated forever. Some of the main victims to be executed were women: women who were killed for denying their husbands their marital rights,
rapists, not husbands
for insulting a preacher, or for daring to practice bigamy – polygamy, of course, being solely a male privilege.”
Ah, the insecure double standards of the r-male. You can tell a polygamist is bad in bed when he won’t let his wife sleep with anyone else. But monogamy cannot exist one-way, morons, it’s a single bond between two. There’s no such thing as half loyal to your military either.
Male privilege, huh? The real thing, finally!
As we can see, some males belong on the bottom of the ladder, with no heirs, they’d destroy civilization otherwise.
We are not like bonobos, trust no one who says we were, more like a biological cross between gorilla and chimp.
“So that the king and his nobles might live in high luxury, rigorous austerity was imposed on everyone else in Münster. The subject population had already been robbed of their houses and much of their food; now all superfluous luxury among the masses was outlawed. Clothing and bedding were severely rationed, and all “surplus” turned over to King Bockelson under pain of death. Every house was searched thoroughly and 83 wagonloads of “surplus” clothing collected.
Anytime they tax actual food, you’re entering dystopia.
It is not surprising that the deluded masses of Münster began to grumble at being forced to live in abject poverty while the king and his courtiers lived in extreme luxury on the proceeds of their confiscated belongings. And so Bockelson had to beam them some propaganda to explain the new system. The explanation was this: it was all right for Bockelson to live in pomp and luxury because he was already completely dead to the world and the flesh. Since he was dead to the world, in a deep sense his luxury didn’t count. In the style of every guru who has ever lived in luxury among his credulous followers, he explained that for him material objects had no value. How such “logic” can ever fool anyone passes understanding.
Celebrities claiming they’re just like you but shouldn’t be taxed like you (nor their films).
Claiming diversity is good and making expensive efforts to avoid it.
I can see how the pseudologic would work.
More important, Bockelson assured his subjects that he and his court were only the advance guard of the new order; soon, they too would be living in the same millennial luxury.
All talk, like Elon “I’m gonna move to Mars” Musk.
Who happens to be a socialist, coincidentally.
And promises the journey to his new kingdom will be “fun” (creep code for orgies). Don’t get on the ship, folks, if you value your holes.
Logically, the greatest good for all would be letting his staff form a union…
Under their new order, the people of Münster would forge outward, armed with God’s will, and conquer the entire world, exterminating the unrighteous, after which Jesus would return and they would all live in luxury and perfection. Equal communism with great luxury for all would then be achieved.”
I’m reminded of Richard Spencer.
Magically prosperous (but anti-merit) ethnostate.
Or Mars. Space Eden. For people too smart to believe in a Savior.
The stars are a nice touch.
“Despite his continual preaching about marching forth to conquer the world, King Bockelson was not crazy enough to attempt that feat, especially since the bishop’s army was again besieging the town.”
Ah, the cowardice! Predictable as a Tottenham match.
“Finally, Bockelson, long fascinated with the theatre, ordered his starving subjects to engage in three days of dancing and athletics. Dramatic performances were held, as well as a Black Mass. Starvation, however, was now becoming all-pervasive.”
“To guard against such a threat, Bockelson stepped up his reign of terror still further. In early May, he divided the town into 12 sections, and placed a “duke” over each one with an armed force of 24 men. The dukes were foreigners like himself; as Dutch immigrants they were likely to be loyal to Bockelson.”
This is why your ancestors never trusted foreigners with promises.
Reminds me of EU “member states” and the region planning.
Why do they want a full army?
“Bockelson would undoubtedly have let the entire population starve to death rather than surrender”
Anyone who has to tell you they’re caring, isn’t.
“As for ex-King Bockelson, he was led about on a chain, and the following January, along with Knipperdollinck, was publicly tortured to death, and their bodies suspended in cages from a church tower.”
They’re still there, the cages.
If only they were women, they’d have instantly been clocked as witches. The vices gave them away as Satanic.
This is why men should distrust other men, especially socialists.
Their luxury comes from your labour.
Today it’s called the Labour party.
“This guy is playing the game to try and become a pied piper on the right, while pushing us left to get media mentions and Cabal support:”
Greetings, fellow nationalists. Don’t focus on the world, avoid it.
I tried counting once how many people he ripped off in his talks and lost count.
I knew he was fake when he refused to debate Millennial Woes, who was prepared to pay his fee. Avoided like a scared little coward. Woes is a sweetheart but logical, difficult to trick. Who’s scared of an ex-art major? Jordan Peterson.
He mostly rips off basic bitch self improvement guru shit too. Men are prime targets because they don’t habitually read that shit like women and think it’s original. The Secret was based off a 20s leaflet.
“Now he tries to mitigate the damage. But he still got it out there like he meant it at a critical moment. And he defended the idea as plausible afterward. And now he is setting himself up as a thought-experimenter, who can never be held responsible for any future tweet that supports evil at critical moments, because it was just part of his process. I’d love to see a real time graph of his books sales, and see if there was a sudden spike of bulk sales right after that tweet.
Like Roosh’s rape fantasy, where, despite world press, nobody brought up pedophilia.
If you take him at his word, then every tweet he gives should be ignored.
Now everything he says is not his opinion, or even correct. Every tweet is basically just him talking out of his ass randomly and spouting whatever pops into his head at that moment.
If you want that, there is no shortage of people you could follow on twitter who will provide it, and many will be funnier and more entertaining than Peterson…..”
He’s the standard Boomer cuck. They’ll mock SJWs on meds and liberal arts majors but not him.
Clean your room? What’s next, do the dishes? Are American men Cinderella?
Look up Charlton, Scruton, Haidt. Men without moving goalposts.
“Even his premise – Kavanaugh was horribly slandered, but the people who oppose him, and slandered him, should have their wishes considered – is totally ridiculous. This is a great thinker?”
It’s ironic considering how many of his followers are shit-scared of rape accusations.
“False” accusations, Kavanaugh’s arse. And if they’re so scared, sleep with sober people? Don’t sleep with people who hate you? Be less of a whore? It’s only really a false accusation if you never slept with them, otherwise a question of consent.
Kinda like standing in a bank on the CCTV while it’s being robbed and being triggered that you’re a suspect.
Admitting half the deed casts valid legal suspicion. That’s exactly what rapists do.
It’s funny because men make various sexual slanders about sleeping with women they didn’t but they don’t care about lies and life ruin then. Sex is serious, slanders about it too. If you can’t handle that, avoid the opposite sex.
When guys lie about sleeping with a woman when they didn’t, that’s a joke. What reputation? When women lie about sleeping with a man they didn’t, it’s serious. Their life might be ruined by a rumour.