The enemy cannot create, only destroy.
Going full woke? wow, they are going to lose so many donations.
According to UK law, charities also aren’t allowed to be political organisations. Campaigning for any political cause means they could be stripped of their charitable ((tax-free)) status.
They won’t commission indigenous people or local artwork, but they’ll go to a whole different continent and celebrate that? Not fit for purpose. Shut it down.
English Heritage has commissioned a series of portraits depicting six historic figures from the African diaspora whose stories have contributed to England’s rich history. Each artist has been supported by our curators and historians to creatively portray their subject, and the paintings will be hung at the English Heritage site connected to its subject.
African colony. They have colonised England, especially London. People did not want them here and still don’t. They have contributed absolutely nothing, ever. Even to their own continent. You didn’t build that, we did. We were down the mines, not you. We were slaves to the Romans, not you. You are leeches who came over largely after two world wars to suck off the new welfare state. You have no reason to be here and we keep voting for you to leave. What do you think the next step is? White people are nice – until we’re not. Tick tock goes the debt clock.
“creatively portray” lie, you mean lie
Get woke, go broke.
English refers to a race.
The first was Queen Victoria’s pet. She was the first virtue signalling Karen. You can tell the pose was traced. Among white people, it’s famous. This one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Trubetskaya
You copied and pasted the pose and just switched the face. We know because that’s a white royal pose. We all know the exact painting you ripped off. They really have no creativity, do they? She even copied most of the white woman’s features, erasing some of the blacker ones. What a damning testament. The bottom of the dress is unfinished and odd-looking because she ran out of things to trace. A race of tracers, apt metaphor. Also why the figure isn’t aligned properly. The tracing paper moved, did it? Should’ve used Photoshop or had a real artist do it for you on fiver.
We wuz Russian Princesses.
The second was a rape baby (slaves don’t consent). “We’ve always been here” – no.
Third enslaved white people “he attempted to subjugate the local tribes there” murderer of the natives, also code for rape. “That area of the world was so multicultural” a colony. It was colonialisation and slavery. You might as well have painted this, in blackface and a toga:
Fourth is white. He’s paler than a Greek. He was also Christian, which is skipped over. Oddly similar to other Saint paintings but that could be a style choice.
Fifth was another military import. Hitler also hired black people, and Muslims, I don’t think that’s a point.
“I didn’t see myself represented in it” because it wasn’t yours. You’re trying to appropriate it.
“black Europeans” oxymoron
Sixth was a ‘servant’. So nobody of any accomplishments? A chamberpot washer? That’s the best you could drag up? He lived in the 1600s but the dumb cunt painted him in later 1700s clothes. It’s supposed to be historical. She couldn’t do it, could she? Details are hard when you’re a diversity hire.
The GCSE tier art is literally the best they could find (with the Saint painting guy having the only talent). I could do better in primary school and I know others who could. That level of ‘talent’ is common which describes my whole attitude to this insult and the army of dislikers they hid.