Social psychology fraud

I am shocked.

I am looking at his book “The Lucifer Effect”.

Literally looking at it.

It is also full of shit.

He wanted to be famous because he was jealous of Milgram, ask around.

Charge him with fraud.

Make an example.

Who wants to tell them personality tests are a way to exclude races and classes you don’t like from job applications, since you aren’t allowed to use IQ?

Narrative: criminals are innocent little babies.

“I have three psychology degrees (two postgraduate). One of the reasons I left academia was because I felt frustrated with the way research was conducted and how results were interpreted. Researchers often get the results they want to see and only ‘successful’ studies make it into journals. There are many highly intelligent people working in this field (or fields- psychology is diverse) and these are good people. What I discovered was often a lack of common sense in the academic bubble. In fact, ‘common sense’ was sneered at.”

Ah, confirmation bias!
Experimenter bias!

The new priests. No questioning!

Next, Kinsey.

A lot of faking about child sexuality and consent there.

In the #MeToo age, come on!

Smash all the sacred cow jars.

Obviously, embracing the animal nature of your sexuality and exaggerating it is doubleplusgood. Be less human! It’ll end well!

I’ve never seen a single life outcome study on that.

Not one.

Yet we all accept it as “fact”…

despite how basic observation demonstrates sexuality is corrosive to 1st world society.

Video: Scruton on Harry Potter

You let Rowling off way too fucking lightly.

Who do you think made Millennials such insufferable cunts?

Nobody really mocks her.

She’s so ripe for it.

She’s like reverse Trump, a billionaire who earned nothing, sucked up alimony while writing in her friend’s wine bar (don’t we ALL have a friend who owns an upmarket trendy wine bar?) and won’t stop sticking her oar into politics.

At least Trump ran for office.
Run for office or STFU.

She was in the news for years with bollocky right-on lefty tweets, Trump picked up her formula.

Here’s a fun word for her

By the way, if you want a common sense philosophical academic to idealise, Sir Scruton is a class act. A truly living legend. No idealisation is necessary. Peterson would be his apprentice, and he’d be happy to be.

Mealy-mouthed appeals to Love replaced God at Hogwarts, Dumbledore gave soapbox speeches on it to the Serpentine Satan figure. The love of cupboard-lovers is worthless. Their ties are convenient and weak.

The “wizarding world” is typified by gullible idiots like Mr Weasley, who was due to die originally. They side with the invaders to their vulnerable society against one of the few people intelligent enough, after knowing the Muggle threat from WW2, to try and protect them. Like Native American reservations. Ollivander called Voldemort great. Tell me, if the wizarding world was set to die without the invasion, why did the Muggleborns care? The most obnoxious characters like the Mary Sue Hermione are traits you are meant to grow out of, she is totally ignorant and dismissive of key wizarding beliefs e.g. divination, because in a tantrum, she fails to understand them. She had a home to return to. What about Ron? Everyone forgets Ron. Harry was already an orphan but Ron is the typical wizard, dull and unethical about his powers. Hermione frequently verbally abuses him for existing. Pureblood privilege? Yet he marries her in a classic case of long-term abuse victims falling to pathological altruism. Hermione is a conqueror, an interloper nobody liked in the first book, a cultural appropriater par excellence, who wishes to steal what parts of wizarding culture she likes, to combine it with her own, still loyal elsewhere to the group which killed these people, and to discard the parts she is too stupid to understand, as if she has any right. If the options are to die without the likes of Hermione (who becomes their political leader in pure Sue fashion) or to lose anything their new conquerors find too traditional, aren’t they already dead? Who disgraces the name of wizard/witch, but Hermione?

Can you really rip off an entire culture from reading books for a few years, let alone lead it?

She’s a dirty weeb. Mudblood indeed.

In Cursed Child, you know she’d be a frequent torture victim as a spy, not a teacher.

The SPEW plot is a key example of category error, she fails to acknowledge house elves are not human, they are Plato’s natural slaves. They are symbiotes to the wizarding world and keeping animals down in their place is something humans do. Imagine giving tigers freedom to roam around humans. That’s like giving a goblin a wand. She is dangerously retarded, slow to understand the differences have reasons. Wizards are lazy because their functional structure means they can afford to be.
At best, house elves had the minds of children (yes, like her) and we carefully supervise what intellectually disabled people are allowed to do or work on in this world. Silly little girl. Capricious and arrogant, all Snape had to do was let her drink a fatally flawed potion of her own making, because Her Way is the Right Way. Imagine atheistkult meets WOW.

She complains about seeing the future because she is more of an inept dullard than Ron at it, but the bitch can travel through time!

How is that sheer level of ignorance even possible in a fantasy book for kids?

In Rowling’s world, the physical weakness of laziness, is the ultimate power. Scream your feelings until what you want happens, by magic. No sweat required, even dying involves no bloodshed.

Bear in mind, the witch trials happened, and it was effectively a genocide of women, with a focus on the elder crone-types and intelligent herbalists. Where are they now?

As I said before, Rowling is an Ultracrepidarian.

A polite term for speaking out of her place.

Who ripped off the Worst Witch, the first famous British story about a magic school.

You want to redpill Millennials?
Expose Rowling. Make it a meme. Never let it go.

Fun fact: aside from the overtly sexist switching of female characters to male that made HP popular and the overtly racist Brit-only hiring policy, Chris Coulson’s an actor in Harry Potter 2, after being in a Worst Witch sequel series. There may be other overlaps, I cba to check. I know people who worked with him so I’m pretty sure. Worried about typecasting.

For meme material, I humbly suggest

He’s selling the shit out of that tambourine. HP only got Jarvis Cocker.

Why do Marxists love welfare?

“In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when “the rest of society is afraid of them,” Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.

Financial crisis? What’s that?

The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven’s early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1971 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.”

There’s no socialism, there’s semi-Communism.
Cthulhu swims Left, look it up.

Go on their forums sometimes.

You don’t even need communist or Marxist in the title.
Look up five brands of socialism that aren’t a demographic and go on their websites. Read the forum posts about bringing down the system. Search Cloward-Piven.
Useful idiots. Leeches killing the host.

Their worst nightmare is empowerment. They are natural slaves. But they need that deadweight of the masses to continue to justify their position socially.
They created the welfare/benefits cliff.
If there were a path out of poverty, they’d hate it.

Fix the cliff, kill the socialist.

And why should someone else pay for your stupid decisions?
Welfare started out as war pensions and war widows. It took over from the Church. There’s no cause for it.
Even NatSocs, if you can’t afford to marry/breed, why should the smart guy down the street foot the bill?
Isn’t the perk of doing things as an adult that you enjoy all the reward, as you take on the risk? Well, if he is paying for your wife’s groceries, he has more of a right to fuck your wife than you do!

No bailouts for adults. No.

You’re already in debt per person for the national debt. Nobody can afford it. Oh, like you’re so special your genes deserve to survive and the people working 100 hour weeks don’t? Who gives a fuck what your IQ apparently is (online doesn’t count) if you can’t do a paper round?

Weak men wanting to give up their provider role are still children, they deserve no respect, let alone heading a house. That is a job. Men get the big respect because they do the big share of the labour. Don’t expect a 50s housewife if you wanna sit around playing Overwatch like a loser (the game is shit, it has good PR) because fulfilling a gender role is a two-way street!

How can you say foreign aid is bullshit but sucking the teat of your countrymen is so moral? Did they choose to be born around idiots?

And whatever happened to sending young disgraced unmarried parents away to the middle of nowhere? Where’s the human right to live in a major city, where the fun stuff is?

Now they live the life of Riley and have the privilege of passing on their DNA. Those trying to save to do the same cannot, because they’re paying for 14yos Ruby and Randy to do something a little more ego-soothing than masturbation.

Link: Is the Gender War driven by women or Jews?

And still, in the comments, men denying responsibility for their own actions, including omission, while women are to blame for things that happened decades or centuries ago.


But men lead, right?

Stop with the false dichotomies, dammit.

Men vs Women IS the SJW paradigm of Gender Wars. To destroy both.

To destroy both by pitting either one against the other.

So women against men.

Equally bad as men against women.

Speak the truth and shame the Devil.

They now admit this goal with ‘gender is over’ and ‘gender is dead’ and everyone as androgynous propaganda. They admit it and supposed red-pill men cover their ears because… a white woman is talking.

Do you even want women to exist?

If your first impulse to “women are harassed” is to harass them, they’re right!

Yeah, we’re not aligned at all because you’re clearly not on our side and do actually hate us. Actions > Words. It’s a modicum of basic human decency, simple respect for libertarian humanity. At least the feminists pretend to listen and pretend to care.

Les Dame Blanches, at your service. If women were devils, we wouldn’t be having this conversation because your mother would’ve aborted you. How about you equally divide the expectations and standards between parents, rather than Blame Mommy (Figures) Forever, which is no more complex than the Sexual Revolution’s counterpart.

Independent people aren’t so bloody entitled. We aren’t mummy or whore. You aren’t daddy or bank account. Welcome to adulthood. All those layers of capital – social, intellectual, emotional, erotic, financial, are signs of success and maturity, not hypocritical.

Who are you going to reproduce with? And if you don’t want to reproduce, you don’t really get an opinion. You’re as anti-natal as the Pill-pushers but I guess it’s the narcissism of small differences.

Misogyny is very simple to describe in practice: blaming women for everything bad.

That’s pagan, that’s Pandora.

(This also works reversed, duh).

Simple question: are women easily led and can we be led astray?

That’s the question about whether it’s possible.

This is being logical.

Try swallowing – your pride. You are probably at least a little bit wrong on any huge subject.