Birth rates and Western culture

I don’t think I linked to these.

Malthus and the Making of the Modern World

Click to access Malthus_final.pdf

On the characteristic individualism of Western cultures.

Click to access 82p171.pdf

“Weber suggested that one of the central causes of the emergence of capitalism and its associated features was the disappearance of extended family structures. … ‘freeing’ the market and the individual.

The individual didn’t exist beforehand.

It’s a common question so here you go, either you can read it or stop circling the same three questions like clueless vultures.

1.How did we get here? – Libertarians who thought they could share without loss.

2.What’s going on with our demography? – r/K but read Malthus first aka Who is alive and why?

3.Why are we different? – Individualism opposes collectivism (non-Europeans) and those differences are irreconcilable, because they are genetic.


Nationalism must come before any capitalistic position or you lose all your resources to the outgroup. You must be fair on your own citizens or no good will come of it.

Comic: Traditionalism is the future

“I had a comic I cannot find for the life of me, each generation was passing on a scroll but the 20th century refused it and wrote their own.”

Guess what.


As written in Empire and Economics;

the anti-dote to the modern and postmodern cancers is Traditionalism.

There’s no way around this.

The only question left is which form plus details.

Most books are bad

“But most books, especially most new books, are not just not-very-good but are very-bad-indeed – not merely in terms of being badly written, but by having bad topics, promoting bad attitudes, encouraging immorality and attacking virtue.”

Reminds me of

What is ambition? Where is our utopia?

We need a dream. I posit the lyrics to Pokemon’s original theme.
There’s a lot of great material in there.
Let’s catch memes and other philosophies.
Eastern anime is based on more Western culture (ripped-off) than Western media, these days. It isn’t as stupid as it appears at first. It will also trigger Dashcon participants. More Darwinian theory in that one piece of music than the average University.

Steal their symbols. Fash their memes, steal their dreams.

Those perma-children need to grow up. They have plenty of free time online to get involved.
You don’t understand the average Gen Y and Z-er has heard that song at least a thousand times. It’s practically written on the inside of our skull at this point. Retool flagrant marketing for positive purposes. No hate, create!

This outgroups anyone over about thirty as a reference so it’ll piss off the Boomers in MSM nicely.

On a personal note.

I’ve seen the odd noob try to claim women destroy movements and point to me.
Ahem, if I may?

They have their timeline mixed up.
1. I join a movement.
2. It gets popular.
This is not a coincidence.
It’s called hustle.
It’s the reason you’re here.
I put this here. I brought you here.

Respect the effort at least, if not me?

I like the part where she says Ree.

Link: On pathology of low birthrates, explained

From the HBD side, both Anonymous Conservative and Jayman have previously agreed that the low birth rate of liberals is a feature and not a bug. The former from the perspective of low child-rearing in r-selection and the latter from genetics and, I guess, Malthus?

It’s connected, r-type extinction events are Malthusian in nature.

Obviously, the PC practice of pathological altruism (there is an academic book of that title on the subject) is applying ingroup evolved mechanisms to depress the ingroup birthrate and increase the outgroup based on the largesse of state theft. It’s a combination of resource reparations and treacherous (if not suicidal and insane) genocide, by the post-WW2 original definitions, already linked here.
~tuts in Social Darwinism~

A selection of neat lil quotes.

“But even people who think about this when it comes to profit and organisations often don’t think about the equivalent for ideas and cultural practices.
To wit: if you want a culture or idea to survive, the people who practice it must have high birth rates…
Because ideas, like most things in this world, are heritable. Both genetics and culture mean that parents in general pass their values on to their children. Take away the children, and you take away the people likely to hold the idea tomorrow.
Of course, people are apt to forget this, because it’s a slow-moving effect. The faster way ideas spread is through communication across a given population.

requires homogeneity and a culture of respect for received wisdom, interrupted in the 20th century, when all the major fault-lines started showing

Which is all well and good. The more you spread the idea, the more people who hold it right now, and, ceteris paribus, the more people will hold it next generation…..”

Richard Dawkins did not advance the idea of a meme.

It was Darwin.

The ‘gene’ is an idea of transmitted information, it is not limited to the biological, it is symbolic theory nor limited to precise ranges of biological material. That is a 20th century use based on chemical experiments to ‘crack’ human DNA using computers.
‘Origin of the Species’ should be on school reading lists. It isn’t because it’s accurate and unPC. Many science teachers aren’t qualified to explain it either, knowing nothing about say, farming or animal breeding, which are used in examples. You need life experience to explain life.

Meanwhile, the intelligent are either at home or in the wider workforce.

Later, on progressivism, political correctness, social justice warrior feminism etc…
Feminism in particular needs a constant fresh crop of young women far more than Patriarchy.

Anti-natal ideologies are parasitic on the host’s reproductive potential, it cripples more surely than Polio. Just look at abortion and anything labelled Cultural Marxism, it’s dysgenic, it’s a society-killer. Just like there are no centuries-old atheist or multicultural societies, these things do not have any survivability or, in PC terms, sustainability (really longevity, they don’t stand up to the scrutiny of history). The ‘right side of history’ rhetoric assumes humans have innately changed within a few generations and the old rules no longer apply.

Why? They are ‘fat and happy’ for the first time in human history. If you look up the history of mankind, we are not designed for this surplus unless our behaviours are prosocial and good for fitness of our ‘family’, genetic kin. (To love your neighbour had always previously meant distant genetic kin). However, charity has murdered the West as well as it has Africa, the fighting spirit and much of the independence and creativity has gone, the intellectual thirst died with candy. A little hunger if we fell behind on bills without welfare or some reliable religious fasting kept us sharp, there are plenty of studies that demonstrate health benefits, epigenetics is coming in, microbiome improvements AND the cognitive spectrum from starvation to gluttony, each with particular traits. Could it have been a sin because it leads to a decadent mind? Perhaps. Too much of a good thing is a very, very bad thing. All these anti-obesity efforts that blame the wrong thing (it isn’t fat, it’s carbs) and increase the price of basic foodstuffs (see CPI and how starvation includes malnutrition, with the lower nutrient profile of mass-produced food) and THAT is a superior explanation for K-shift and the so-called ‘rise of conservatism’ like a tidal wave.

Bread and circuses.

The deepest self-loathing is genetic suicide, the notion you don’t deserve to live – into the next generation.

All surviving religions have a pro-natal credo. This is not a coincidence.

I like these old-type posts but feel I’m explaining why water is wet.


If you’re searching for dysgenic factors or variables to trigger suicidal liberals.

NRx v AR

It's a fantasy of social power above sexual power

Apparently this needs to be explained. Howdy.

Trump was partially elected because all the SJW CMists could do was evoke a ‘parade of horribles‘. ‘Literally Hitler’ ad hominem is that fallacy in reality. The enemy promised he’d be effective. They miscalculated that normal, sane people wanted the things they threatened.

View at

“It has been argued that neoreaction is just an elite salon that has no obligation to interface with the public.”

Ebony Tower?

2SD minimum barrier for entry is right though, hence normie-reaching memes.

NRx is the dialectic to the AR rhetoric.
It is the accurate, scientific foundation to your shitposting. The truthful basis is the edge the enemy cannot match.
The HBD IQ data behind the immigration memes.
The hierarchy behind the failings of democracy.
The religion behind the anti-degeneracy.
The history behind the memes.
The leadership opposing the cucks.
The enlightenment behinds the lolz.

“Personally, I think neoreaction does have a future, and will continue to. It serves as an indispensable bridge for intellectuals from outside of the reactionary world. If it were not for neoreaction, many of today’s younger Reactionaries probably would not be very reactionary at all. What other role models do they have? Andrew Anglin? Milo Yiannopoulos? Mike Cernovich? No.”

Study them for a change lol see how they like it

The model white societies found all over European history, that has not a Jew in sight. History shows what we can achieve and Yarvin points this out. The dark part is understanding we are in the real Dark Ages – of degeneracy.

“Neoreaction is more of a way of thinking than a coherent movement, a way of thinking distinctly different than the alt right but valuable in its own way.”

First, Trump got the Republican ticket because of the Zodiac theory, and don’t you forget it, or we’d all be sucking on Hillary right about now. People who didn’t know who Cruz was, knew that meme.

The formula for victory is simple.

1. don’t do what they want you to, always ask yourself the question
2. don’t fit their stereotype, ‘protest’ doesn’t work*
3. don’t be a degenerate when you’re criticizing their degeneracy (a lot of supposed* right-wingers, are not)
4. live the good life, be the happy model as much as possible
5. patience and indoor voices, the SJWs want to trigger you, be the voice of reason and let third parties decide
6. they hold the swing votes to bring in the people with the power over the CM academia to actually Do SomethingTM

We have memes and a dream. That’s all we need, baby.

jessica stam wink sexy

*use the enemies’ tactics against them
fight fire with fire
protest is a victory lap, the mind is the terrain

*signalling subversives, liars, turncoats and hypocrites

Why won’t women* wait until marriage?

TLDR: Because you keep rewarding marrying the whores.
*Applies vice versa too.

This question is absurd if you know the first thing about human psychology.


It presupposes you’d marry them.

I want so dearly to post a screencap breaking this to a lost comrade, who thinks marrying a feminist is a sensible prospect. Here’s the gist of that conversation.

Aren’t you a right-wing hypocrite? Since you’re settling with a feminist, plus she (clearly) isn’t a virgin? Despite how you think that’s the ideal model of society and previously thought guys who settled for less were getting cucked, in some way?

Either it’s the standard or it’s meaningless. You’re a literal virtue signaller.

*cue butthurt*

Well, logically, either it’s a standard or it doesn’t matter, but a lot of men keep selecting long-term prospects based on short-term dating needs then complaining why there aren’t more long-term types.
Like, you can’t sit around twiddling thumbs wondering why more women don’t wait, when the ones who sleep around get picked for marriage just as often or even more often.
Women notice.
The reward incentives are skewed toward the whores, regardless of what men ‘intend’ and supposedly ‘believe’ – they aren’t acting like it.

So it doesn’t matter what they say. Women know men lie through their teeth.

Like, they want a woman to wait, but they refuse to wait for her; the type to insist they ‘try before they buy’ (degenerate) – when they also want a virgin bride so, you tell me how that fucking works.

*cue rationalizations*

*nobody can explain to me how that’s supposed to work*

If men don’t shun the ones who get around in favour of the ones with better morals, they can’t say they care about those morals in ‘mother of their children’ material. It clearly doesn’t matter to them, materially.
Because women look at the role models who get the reward of commitment, and imitate them.

That is literally ALL WOMEN DO.

That’s what they are, role models.
They get the intended ‘prize’ by pretending to play the short game then using endorphins against men to blind them to the woman’s quality since they couldn’t ‘snag’ them without that doping.

It reminds me of the welfare principle compared to Don’t Feed The Bears.

Don’t marry the sluts. Unless you want to make more sluts.

Behaviourism, bitch.

This is quite hilarious and I already having a bet going with a mutual friend about how long this will last. I’m not altogether against it, because it’s clearly the only way he’ll learn his lesson.

And I no longer need to listen to any of his inane opinions on the societal cancer of feminism, it’s brilliant; I can simply direct him to His Wife. You’re in favour of feminism if you literally marry it. Protip for women: never let a man use you as an emotional crutch to relieve his SO. It’s good for him and neither of you.

Can you guess which category these matches fall into, given the wealth of research that partners need like-views on matters political and religious?

The Prisoner's Dilemma as Applied to Marriage game theory original


I will post a single line of screencap because it made me almost fall over laughing.



His choice of words, not mine.


The utter hypocrisy of the signalling Right.
The fastest way to kill feminism is to destroy its signalling value. If no man ever married a feminist again, it would go back to being all lesbians. Commitment is the only card you have over us, don’t waste it!

It’s the ONE card men have over the modern woman, the Trump card, if you will.

It’s literally the only form of strike the feminists would ever truly care about, since it’s the only thing other women would care about, moving us either way. Calling them fat on twitter won’t work, see the song Dear Future Husband.

A good old-fashioned public shaming works, but while we’re shaming the sluts (male and female alike), what about the people supposedly on our team who marry them? Shouldn’t the shaming be greater, since they claim to know better?

You have literally fucked the supply and demand curve in the Marital MarketPlace (MMP).

That isn’t on women, that’s on the right-thinking men who marry left.

Where did the fake Trump leak come from?

They’ve been waiting to doxx something on Trump for years.
What a way to start 2017, amirite?

You know, I once knew an English theatre actor, you’d probably know his face, who was/is heavily into water sports….

You’d never be able to tell by looking at him, though.
It’s one of those ambiguous and vaguely gay fetishes.

It will never not be funny to me.


I am an adult and I resisted the temptation to passive-aggressively post his picture here.
Tumblr would cry. I’d cry with laughter because there’s a detailed anecdote about foreskins.

Note the mysterious gaps.


Thanks, Anoni-chan!

Thanks, Anonymous Buzzfeed and MSM tipper!


Off-topic and on a totally unrelated note: the Allies spread a rumour about Literally Hitler having that exact, oddly specific fetish. I’m sure that’s a coincidence…

Meme War 2016


Credit: GSOGM

…Started it.

Who’d believe me, right? Being female. I’m hardly the only one by far but… I mean, it’s an internet principle old as Anonymous to hide who or what you are to accomplish a task, to lose your identity for a cause, but its tricky to explain in this case because it relies on a happenstance interaction of parts of the internet which simply didn’t talk to each other, and rarely knew of each other’s existence or principles beyond propaganda.

Short v?

It was neoreaction, ripped off by the manosphere and empowered in tactics by Gamergate. This is the secret recipe to the Alt Right.

A spicy splinter of rhetorical shivs based on the past century’s failures of Leftism.

First there were bitchy but logical comments. That didn’t work. (Gen X)
Then there were poignant GIFs. That didn’t work. (Gen Y)
Then there was shitty MS Paint meme. How did that work? (????)

It still boggles me.

All this time, society needed smart people to shitpost?

Memes contain a message, the medium is the message. We simply based ours on reality and people cried out for it, hungry and eager for the truth after decades of media misinformation.

We were pointing out their stupidity and mocking their hypocrisy.

The false piety, social signalling pathological altruism set never have a sense of humour either.
There were layers. Like an onion.

Fun fact: the first widespread meme of ours was TFW.

Fun fact: the first widespread meme of ours to hit normies like a boulder was TFW, parodying the SJW Tumblrina notion of ‘feels’ with white, hetero male issues.

Similarly, Pepe was brought out of the shoe box. I like frogs* and Fight Club, so what?

Blame the 90s (90s kid memes, also us) and the Muppets. It’s no coincidence he’s sipping tea disapprovingly. They love reading into pop culture so we gave them shit to work with.

Remind you of anyone? Very English, si?

Literally me.

Drink of monarchy and colonies.

Everyone knows memes don’t have a source, like ancient ideas.
They arise magically and anonymously. Their purpose is sharing. It’s very Marx, really.
Cultural transmission…. of Marx.

Sippy sippy.

Why do this?
Why be alternative?


I remember when we’d put Impact on cats and consider the job done. Ah, 2009.

It’s a good, old-fashioned British wind-up, m8.

The response?

MSM pages of writing. That doesn’t work, even when it’s true. It’s old media.
The GIF offensive. That doesn’t work, it’s non-nonsensical. There’s no message to meme, it’s a VERB.

We’ve seen them fake craptacular memes and false flag them from us. One problem. There’s no truth. Incidentally, they’re not funny. It rings false. Reverse search, bitches. You might have trouble with technology and fumble with a kidd-i-phone but your target readers don’t. They can tell when fake news comes out of bought organisations. The authority of a name is only as trusted as the journalists working under it. Citizen journalism has come to politics.

Still, this explains the monarchy/tradition/democracy digs, from Neoreaction, frustrated at false conservatism of broken liberal 20th century values. Brexit is obviously a pro-monarchist stance of sovereignty. It explains the bitchiness of the manosphere and the splinter anti-feminists, a single cause solution to which Trump was the answer and begins the long arduous task of moving back the Overton window to the true, social middle. Gamergate roped in outraged libertarians who just wanted to game in peace and allowed a trial of never-before-seen Lefty tactics armed against them from technically their own, the classic liberal, like shooting them with their own cannon.
The Alt Right is really a variation of the Dark Enlightenment, just read. This explains the focus on what builds a good society, the computer metaphors (tech nerds) and HBD forbidden sciences, like hiding alchemy. The redpill with less blue balls caused by the Cathedral, now Swamp’s Cultural Marxism. I think that’s it, really. In summary.

If you want to be at least two years ahead, go to Gromar and co.

You will notice I am not there, but pretty much my ideas are cited everywhere.
I cross-post and cross-fertilize like a bisexual guy.
I’m not formal enough to fit in anywhere…

How also to avoid Entryism, post GG.
heehee me-me

The manosphere was cynically riding a trend wave and borrowing the way we used certain ideas to sell their personal brand and get internet celebrity or hedonism. We disliked that and spurned them from trying to claim to be one of us, since they aren’t in any way, shape or form. Their personal lives expose they’re anything but traditional, they’re SJWs with a little more Machiavellian logic, it’s a fairweather association on their side for shekels. They’re happy to try and slander the real people, including me. It’s rather funny because they haven’t the reputation for their accusations to be believed, if anything it improves their opponent’s profile.

Many have pointed to GG in the MSM but that wasn’t really it. GG was a consumer rally cum conspiracy theory. The ideological basis is firmed grounded in NRx, vast and lengthy treatise written by fine people and I’m still listed around the place and cited as one of those sites. We’ve expanded to approach the common man as audience, instead of staying in our academic dry bubbles and finally, the conservatives are fighting to reinstate and preserve things.

The SJWs cannot leave their bubble. Reality is hostile to thee.

The victories of 2016 were laid into the fertile soil at least two years ago with the crystallization of NRx.

A couple of years ago around late 2013/early 2014 when NRx became a Thing, we were discussing the need to reach a wider, more normal and probably less autistic audience. NRx has a barrier to entry by IQ, certain conceptual ideas are out of reach for common people (academia background of many of us, I admit it) although we did pilfer some rationalists from LW before it went under with entryism. There are thousands of pages of NRx, it’s more commitment than a religion and very self-referenced, so while applicable to society’s needs and good per se, we agreed it would be better to use more real names and identities without falling for the siren lure of MSM-appeasing celebrity like the manosphere/PUA manwhores. [1] More indexing sites by specific subject and academia-neutral or journalistic places were set up during this time. I came back in to do this and help with this, including spreading the word in person, in secret (STEM, mostly). This reached influential people, eventually. It was a social experiment, we had no idea what would be.

I’m not the only one to know this or notice the curious correlations between ideas of supposedly distinct internet tribal peoples. (Though I am one of the half dozen who moves easily between these parties).


Merry Christmas.

2016, year of the cultural crusade.

It doesn’t end there.

sarcasm scott I'm fine okay good great lol happy

You think I didn’t have advanced plans? Really?

Christmas came twice for me, I got everything I wanted this year.
The globalists can’t target the faceless, they can’t attack the abstract.
Ideas are bulletproof but people are not. Ideas can be forgotten… or remembered.


The time has come.

[1] For the time being the ‘manosphere’ (truthfully dead for a long time thanks to dead weight) cheer-lead some of our muted, watered-down ideas, signalling their ‘neomasculinity’ (what a rip, I wonder what they reference there) but generally they censor aspects of reality they don’t like, worse than SJWs because they’re doing this knowingly, like border laws for their sex tourism, ignoring human rights in Europe because they apply to feminazis too. They want to be edgy and they want money. They will never do this for free like NRx, GG or the real AR. They are whores of Patreon plugged into the system we despise, they’re false opposition that will defend it when the time comes. Just look at the way they treat women, when Patriarchy would string them up. They’re mostly either in the shady world of supplement sales or con artists promising The Secret, with more dicks. The manosphere will claim anything for attention so generally we ignore them and side-eye the fact a pro-white society movement (50s America) is happily led by kebab.

*Yes, that was the reason.
They’re forced to cover our memes, the pure raw idea, to deny it. A meme is a trojan horse of ideology.