Do women just hate all men? (serious)

TLDR: Yes but also no. Yes for their actions and endorsements, not for being male. It’s more resentment than hatred. Like the hippy slutty Boomers. 7,000 words.

This is going to answer some questions I believe merit being taken seriously because it ties into biology and our future.

It is brutally honest and true, whatever any woman tells you. I have no reason to lie, remember.

I think even the MGTOW types would largely agree with this assessment because it’s rooted in Darwin. Men have all the power, women are mostly sitting there. Waiting for them.

Are the men of today equal to the WW2 generation? Yes or no?
In terms of genetic fitness, we all know the answer is no.
No, they are not.
And women definitely resent this.
All the ‘vintage’ trends aren’t just longing for the ability to wear twirly dresses and high heels without falling afoul of a rapist immigrant, they subconsciously want the genetic fitness of men back. (although women are dressing androgynous to avoid attack by immigrants too, but men refuse to admit this, instead pretending they all wanted to look asexual simultaneously by fluke)
Naturally, none of them will dare tell you this. Especially the tradgirls, so-called conservathots. Do they seem happy to you? Does a bitterness creep in, much like the sad MGTOWs? They believe they’ve made a compromise out of the measly postmodern pickings. Their husband would not be their first choice, if they could get a WW2 hero type instead. All women know this and that is why modern housewives are mocked for ‘settling’. Settling for inferior quality men, not to settle down. In surveys, such women want to get married, so it’s a quality thing. Women are the gatekeepers of genetic quality in the land, men are the protectors of the land itself, remember that. Men are in denial about the sexual selection at play amongst women. All women value men for is genetic fitness. Nobody cares about bank balance if you’re so old (paternal age) you make an autistic kid. Genetic fitness uber alles. It is the reason for both to live. It is the reason for sexual reproduction. A combination of genetic fitness. So women are effectively in an arms race to claim the best man as their provider. Sperm donor means nothing or the ghetto would be doing great.

Compare current ‘men’ to those in the 1990s, then the hippies of the 1970s, the halcyon 1950s, then the WW2 tough 1940s etc. It gets worse and worse the longer you look. Do you imagine women don’t notice?
I don’t think it’s that women hate men, per se, I think sexual selection is at play and women hate what men have become. That is the fault of men and something to place fairly at their feet. The obesity rate is much discussed but most obese people are men. They have no pregnancy excuse, no Pill, no menopause. They even tried to meme it in a fat acceptance way as Dad Bod. WTF. They’re lazy slobs who love beer and wings more than their wife. Don’t be shocked when she no longer wants to fuck you, dude. If you look like a 10 month pregnant woman, she’d have to be a secret lesbian. Do you imagine women don’t comment on these developments? Women always handle men with kid gloves because a certain proportion are insane and will snap and kill people if spoken to like fellow adults, on any topic that threatens their Hollywood-built ego (masculinity is fragile, in this era, not others). When in the bathroom, complete strangers of women will just rip into other women’s husbands, including whether he looks weak (like the weeb with a waifu that has a stronger manjaw than him, and trails along behind her like a dog) or whether he got fat (liver disease, fatty liver) and predicting how long the marriage will last while her libido is trying to make it work. Women naturally have a larger body fat percentage to be healthy (T&A) so this stigma only really goes one way, especially since men cannot get pregnant. This and many other factors, women are brutal in judging. Add in cultural alcoholism giving them impotence issues (PC term ED) and how overweight men have dick shrinkage (look it up) and higher oestrogen, and there’s much to discuss behind their back because they’re not man enough to acknowledge it themselves.

It’s like how all the ugly men rally around to call one another 7s because they have a job. That isn’t how numbers work. You’re all like 2-3s to even ask that shit, brutally. We need a hot or not for men on the 10-scale, looks-only, no hiding behind income, since they would be SHOCKED. It isn’t that women are harsh in rating men. Women are realistic. Women evolved to be, sexual selection is the women’s duty. Men are answering from sexual desperation with a slutty attiude and rank women too highly, sorry. Female simps exist (called pick-mes) but they’re far rarer than men.

So we have an embittered manchild demographic who thinks they belong on a GQ cover because they aren’t as fat as their slob friends and can tie their shoes (but don’t you draft them!), with perverse tastes refined by hardcore POV fetish porn and an ego constructed by the finest of Hollywood’s Jewish minds. So far, so repulsive. Women are sure missing out on that partay.

Then consider what separates a boy from a man. It isn’t age. It isn’t whether he ‘fucks’ (nb. violent bravado terms for anything sexual are a tell of a low quality male, who is also very, very, very bad in bed*). Hollywood lies to men and tells them women want “players” (and players share this as urban legend, despite dying alone). Women do not. In studies, women want conscientious** men for ‘long-term mate selection’, who don’t have diseases and retain the ability to pair bond. Yes, what women want in husbands, men wants in wives. Imagine that. Almost like they’re made for each other. Women swoon over Mr Darcy, they ogle James Bond***. Women would not wish to marry James Bond. Look but don’t touch. He looks diseased and …sticky.
Who wants to marry a thot?

*to speak like an edgelord 13yo past the age of like, 15.
**emotional intelligence, which correlates to IQ so is very much real
***Women sexually objectify men casually more than non-pathological men sexually objectify women, they don’t just tell them about it (verbal abuse) or act any differently (groping etc). They are just looking. This is why women love to read romances and watch entire plot lines about who is getting married. They imagine the couples. It’s the visualisation, they don’t actually want it.

Thus far? As women judging Western men? (also note how female weebs describe Asian men, reconcile with above)

So we have hypocritical sluts claiming their ‘body count’ (violent term) doesn’t count (???) while they brag about defiling the potential wives of other men or hardcore porn addict wankers – so far, so repulsive. Where is the defending Western values part? Even Christian men are whores nowadays, don’t @ me. Having a girlfriend is living in sin. Women don’t look at what you say because men are the liars of the sex*, women look at actions e.g. marriage plots in a story, not proposals.

*most liars are psychopaths and most psychopaths are men, it’s science

MOVING ON—

What distinguishes men from mere males is moral authority.
To put it bluntly, modern men have zero of it.
Not little, but zero.

Look at the average partner count for men (higher than women, most sluts are men, just with a smaller group of women), look at the race-mixing data (higher in white men than women, by far) and look at the deadbeating (almost always a man abandoning his kids, not the mother). This is maths. It is incontrovertible.Women have higher sexual disgust, when studied, than men. By a very, very long shot. As in, practically speaking, women would be happy to die alone than waste their time and risk their life investing in the genetic line of a perverse degenerate aka a man they cannot (biologically) respect. Run studies specifically, you’ll see. Would they rather die alone or have kids with a man who had 5, 50, 500 sexual partners? Second study, a man who is a ‘sex tourist’ in countries with child age of consent? How do you imagine women would assess it?

The manosphere is not redpill, they are bluepill. They twist statistics to avoid responsibility on themselves. Single mothers didn’t get themselves pregnant, lads. The manosphere is so bluepill they agree with the white genocide, they agree with the immvasion and the race-mixing. They are civnats at best who believe (like postmodernists they are) that culture is a magical spell over the magic dirt of Da West and NOT the exclusive entitled homelands of white people, and when you add in lazy shit to the village well, it’s still fine to drink from! Because they got their Chinese restaurants, herpes-spreading massage parlours and slightly cheaper nanny for their abandoned baby. Magical thinking morons. That is not a Christian society any more (if it ever was). If stripper or hooker is a possible career path in your culture for your teen daughter, it is not Christian, but Satanic. This reaction to Puritanism in America is like a pendulum swing in the process of going back and cancel culture is the transition period. Cancel culture is anti-degenerate but concealed. Soon, it will be openly. Sure, women are so jealous (/sarc) of the tragedy of the commons playing out: morally, demographically, culturally and in terms of disease. Y’all sound like Boomers who moved to Thailand to be open pedos. Multiculturalism is the enemy, not Pleasure fucking Island. If you wanna go on holiday, go. Don’t IMPORT it. If you wanna live with it, move THERE, do not force your fellows and the future of your homeland to suffer your dirty hippy xenophilia. Women see men become asses and who wants to marry an ass or a class clown? Even their married men claiming to be traditional are not putting their friends aside for their families. Marriage is a commitment.Forsaking ALL OTHERS. The biggest problem with America is this homosociality, you replaced the nuclear family for it. You are not homo married to your buddies. So that’s another arrow in the quiver of why women all secretly ‘hate’ men (but not all men) and won’t ever tell them. We have men bitter on forums at 7pm that there’s no wifey making dinner for them when they get back from work, when they’re actually seeking out the company of men online instead, for spousal emotional support. That’s faggoty. Friends are not a replacement spouse, they’re like wine uncles nagging about the Boomer ball and chain anti-nuclear family rhetoric so WTF. Who wants to marry that? It’s a support group of losers, most of the time. Shouldn’t you be with your family? Why are you here writing the same ‘articles’ for decades, blaming women for male failures in gender role instead of teaching your sons not to cuck? Btw blogger is not a job. This shit is not work. You shouldn’t get paid for this. It’s an online diary. The manosphere is functioning as a homosocial cult (excluding women to profiteer from its members, financially exploitative) so naturally women are avoiding them. They don’t functionally want a woman, they want other men. Let that sink in. That’s why Youtube hasn’t removed all sorts of angry anti-white (women) males from the platform. It’s a trap. A demographic trap. A Pied Piper of anti-white men propaganda, anti-white nuclear family, anti-patriotic and pro-foreign, convincing them to castrate themselves (cutely called the snip or in behaviour, becoming child-free meninists by choice*) before the Muslims do it. Yes, let’s sign up to breed with any male dumb enough to fall for castrating himself! Ladies, don’t crowd them! Form an orderly line!

*because nothing is more attractive than a person of EITHER sex bragging about their mental problems and sterility (which is usually actually caused by STDs, so it might be a cover story)

Seriously, as testosterone levels drop thanks to porn ejaculations (yes, production is finite in sperm too) and other bad habits, why would women want them? Do you want manjaw and fat high-T athlete shouldered women? So why are you entitled to be desired by women, despite being more woman-like yourself, including the endless nagging? Women are not responsible for the West, men are. Their gender role is moral authority in a marriage. A man invented the Pill. A male college professor in America was involved in the court case to give it to an unmarried couple. The politicians who wrote the Immigration Act were men. Yet all the manosphere does is nag women, for problems caused by men.

Rape gangs? Men.
Crime rates? Men.
Murder and terrorism? Men.
Nobody getting married and breeding? Men propose — or don’t.
Weak laws? Most judges and police are men.
Stupid hiring practices? The board is run by men.
Dodgy curriculum? Who funds and runs Marxist charities informing said teachers? Even a man founded Femen. Women see this, even if you play ignorant. Men play dumb all the time to their own responsibility, their own contribution to the Fall, the hypoagency is obscene, let alone the gaslighting about it and chickens are finally coming home to roost in a way you can no longer ignore. The manosphere is a broken record and women have long since tuned out. They never want to man up. They have retarded gender development, they have never mentally grown up and it shows. There are men who are like 40-50, grandfather age, still pondering if they’re ‘ready’ to become dad to an autist. They dawdle like women. They wouldn’t even fight off an invading force to save their own lives, so if that’s a man, we deserve whatever we get from China (who is funding the Marxist universities, btw, not da white wimmin). Personally, I hope for meteor strike.

What is the function of men?
Protector. Of his kin. Of his sired family later.

No woman can nor should try to bail men out of their gender role. You won’t give birth for us so it’s actually equal. Any man complaining women have it easy? Sign up to have a womb transplanted and give birth. No? Thought not.
Suck it up, buttercup. This is the world of your making. The Mary Whitehouse types warned you this would happen. You still mock them as jealous of you. They were Cassandra. They were correct. Nobody is jealous of degeneracy. It’s an option for everyone. Young people are rejecting it. Biology is real. Government can only coddle so long. The dam threatens to break still. Hot potato is a game only Boomers are old enough to play.

What does this male gender role mean, in practical terms?
Demographic protection.
Now, an awareness of this is present in all women. All of them. Subconsciously, women respond to the facts of white minority (there are studies about a perception of threat) and strangely dressed foreigners far more than men do. Why? Women rely on men to protect them, whether it’s 999 or whatever. The men expect another man to defend THEIR family and this extends nationally and racially. They feel no investment patriotically because the police protect them, cowards, from personal threat – temporarily.

In hindsight, replacing mob justice between families with the police was a mistake. It made men soft.

Immigrant ‘gangs’ are the new ‘police’ brewing, them genociding us. Currently they only pick off the occasional man, so cuck men let it slide. Without police protection, it’d be open season on whites and they’d suddenly care, long after women and children were targeted.

The modern man (or postmodern man) is not a man at all. He is a eunuch. So many wars were fought by his forefathers, so much blood was spilled, over thousands of years, so he could happily import invaders as ‘immigrants’ (PC term) to fill his factories (class traitor) and his bed (race traitor). You aren’t an alpha if your kids look adopted, you were genetically cucked. White genes are recessive. They are less than 50% yours, I had the term on another post ages ago, ask pol. But these are facts. If you cannot get one (1) hot woman to breed with you from your own group, that is not alpha. It’s omega. Omegas will lower their standards as much as necessary (rejected by the in-group, not all groups*) and women definitely perceive this (note the white women race mixing stats). The rest is high on copium. Look at the divorce rates of such males if you don’t believe me. Again, facts. Like their mongrel’s mental illness rates. From pol/:

*so any white woman could mix, it’s always an option, the omega option

They permit immigration, which is biologically invasion so mentally women think of them as cowards. They permit terrorism attacking their sons and rape gangs attacking their daughters, so where’s the main gender role of men? Even the police and army aren’t what they once were. Men have no function any longer. They have replaced themselves. They have cucked themselves for globalism. For the Beige People NWO OWG dream of Open Borders, whether it’s encoded in law or not. Practically, it’s the same Hippy Wet Dream. Men have abandoned their post and obviously, women hate them for this. The low trust society they chose, from fear. Continuous fear. They never correct it, many go along hoping to be killed by the invaders last. They would rather die out than be called insults by their enemies.
Imagine if any of their ancestors packed up because their enemies were trying to psych them out.
The species would’ve died long ago.

Men are the rarest thing now. Even so-called chad types (sluts aren’t the same as desirable mates but k) aren’t reproducing, which is ultimately what women want from men, so from a biological perspective it’s no wonder the birth rate is down because neither party is getting their needs met, men for emotional companionship (distracted by hook-ups) and women for protection and loyalty. Also, do men even like women any more or just want a wet hole? Hook-ups are inhumane, they treat other human beings like a sex toy, like a piece of plastic. There’s nothing to envy. It’s pathetic. Mainly they are just masturbating into these women for the approval of other weak-ego men (homosocial motives). Approval-seeking is weak. Men are supposed to validate themselves and the manosphere denies them this to sell them shitty books and ‘courses’. The slutty men are incapable of making love, whatever their claims, so goes through an endless parade of pussy (called girlfriends) because they cannot satisfy a single one of them with lovemaking, which is newsflash the only thing women want, physically. Have you met a sane woman who wanted to be fucked? Who made them that way? Damage goes both ways, and the book Hooked goes into the brain damage both sexes have from sleeping around (masturbating with other people like a psychopath would). Culture is now psychopathic, so why would women respect men? It’s a culture that hates everything women love – the nuclear family, pair bonding and commitment to one’s family. Psychopaths are statistically most sluts, psychopaths are nomads who never commit and are fond of novelty like xenophilia and they deadbeat their family, if they have one. Low IQ men (misogyny is a trait of them, as previously covered)* have been permitted by morally weak smart ones to set the standard for the mores of the West. How many college educated men used it like a free brothel, instead of finding a good wife? Why did we abolish breach of promise for cads? Society is shit because men made it like this. Women only follow where men morally or immorally lead. When has a woman ever started a moral trend? In all human history? Men establish the sexual mores, women just enforce them. There is nothing to enforce now. Look in the mirror for someone to blame, you all became the 30yo Boomer meme. You wanted a global brothel, you got it. You don’t get to fuck around like a witless farm animal then act all entitled like where da virgins at? You are neither entitled to respeK. Nor to ‘trade up’ – to which crop of pristine women? It’s the r-type dream of an untouched meadow for them to corrupt and destroy like sexual squatters. Where they exist they hide from the likes of you, you beasts who walk on two feet, claiming to be men. Rutting sluts deserve rutting sluts. R-types with r-types. K-types with K-types, you can’t change it because it’s how your brain developed. There’s a cap and you cannot go back. Virgins want other virgins, ask them and reee. Their heads explode when virgins tell them they’re disgusting. They are entitled to their own kind, with zero hypocrisy, not the slobbering gross old men who caught diseases in other countries, out-breeding. Hollywood lied to you. Again, Darcy was a virgin. (So was Jesus). Do women prefer him or the degenerate cad Mr Wickham? Which one do modern women prefer too? History will remember many modern white men as spiteful race-mixing sluts, who felt entitled to a pure, patriotic woman they never earned, after wasting decades on the Club Scene. Tragedy of the commons played out sexually. The statistics will also show this. The monomyth is about earning a woman. It isn’t about slaying a dragon, it’s overcoming your own temptation to lust. Choosing her over other women by y/our personal actions (no Muh Dick excuses). Anyone can pick a favourite dish after gorging on the whole buffet table! That’s a deadly sin. Actions speak louder than words. So many claim to be traditional but we women judge by sexual history, it cannot lie. We judge other women and also men. You risk death for the hand of the fair maiden because the wages of sin is death. Boomer Peterson won’t tell you this. It’s truth.

*they resent women because women reject them for low genetic fitness. See top of this post.

Hardcore HD pornography has ruined the West and pair bonding. It goes both ways. Both men and women are lesser quality. It’s just that women have the choice, to invest in the genetics of men or not.
And they are logically concluding not.
Why breed with the weak?
Why waste resources in a low trust, survival society, on cowards? They’d abandon their children, plenty already have (deadbeating) and other men have refused to hold them criminally accountable. Indeed, they blame helpless women and chldren for BEING abandoned, in the ultimate of anti-white victim blaming. It’s like saying why was your 11yo daughter wearing a mini-skirt in London around the Muslim immigrant? Crime is the fault of criminals, this is the First World and we used to have standards. Like don’t cuck for criminals. Anyone who makes excuses for rapists (a crime women consider worse than murder) is worse than serial killer simps. At least those guys are in prison. Meanwhile the manosphere accuses even virgins (child or adult) of making up a false rape accusation, which IS a spin, knowing it’s logically impossible to prove a negative re consent. AKA they hate you. They hate the West. They endorse rape. They write entire articles about rape like pedo-enablers talking about age of consent. They try to nudge the line and talk about ‘what’s rape, really?’ Like ‘what’s a minor, really?’ It’s the same Marxist moral relativism. You wonder why so many are single, or perma-divorced?
Women do not tolerate bullshit. We didn’t have these problems in an all-white (non-genocidal) safe society. The EU has admitted to this replacement agenda on their own website in the past, Hillary Clinton gleefully used the term ‘white genocide’ on TV and the manosphere still, oddly, refuses to address the Genocide Question in all but broadest brushstrokes. No actions for correction suggested. Yet more years of navel-gazing. Controlled opps.The pig pen of bitter men.
However, women are passive, so the men are stupidly taking ages to figure it out.
Women resent men for multiculturalism.
Historically, what happens after victory in every war?
A BABY BOOM.
Controlled by the women.
You cannot expect war victory spoils when you refuse to fight the war.
And invasion means war. Check the definition. It doesn’t need weapons. We’ve been at war since the first boats from Africa coming to London in the 40s (Windrush) and in America, moreso since the Immigration Act in the 60s that basically permitted long-term constant demographic invasion ever since.
You cannot expect a white society, from an increasingly non-white demographic.
You cannot expect the comforts of a high trust society, from a low-trust multiculturalism.
If the great Roman Empire can be felled by immvasion, none of the West is exempt. Where is your Coliseum? The McMansions won’t last a single century. It took Rome longer than that to decline.
So “men” cry out for general, societal respect and the women ask, why?
Because respect is earned.
It’s based on gender role. Something you do.
Men refuse to defend their country, and indeed, side with the enemies to the sons and daughters, then, much like the Marxist Boomers, wonder why they are despised by their own kin.
This has been World Civil War, for decades now. We fought two world wars so we wouldn’t have entire boats of foreigners invading. Immigration IS invasion and invasion is immigration. This is becoming blatant as the NWO types import invaders despite supposed health risks. It’s a lie, it always was. This isn’t for your safety or economy. It’s to destroy you.
Men pretend to be asleep, it’s easier. This has higher stakes than pretending you can’t use the washing machine.
If they had the will, mass deportations would largely fix this. It could be done in a year or two. If they refuse to leave peacefully, which they know they will (even if you cut off welfare, which is cucking for foreign families), then the war would go hot and men… do not care. They’d allow their baby cousin to get bent over by invaders if they could keep the fetish porn and video games.

That’s your side, guys.

When Hillary is on your side, it isn’t patriotic.
https://www.fightwhitegenocide.com/portfolios/clinton-mentions-white-genocide/

Women know this.
Women hate them for it.
Why do you think Marxist women infantilise immigrants?
They KNOW. They know it’s a war and conscious cucking may spare them, it eases cognitive dissonance as crimes rise. Because passivity is a trait of women and gamma men.
The rise in gamma men, not culled by a hot war, is the primary problem.
Subconsciously, those lefty women know the men are threats, they know the immigrant family down the road is stealing their national resources and intending to replace them by reproduction (a form of UN genocide).
They know. But what can the women do about it? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. It is NOT the female gender role. Powerlessness causes mental suppression. Did they speak of a rape culture pre-immvasion? Feminists blame weak white men for the actions of immigrants they permitted to invade. They’re right about that. The rest is window dressing.
So you get soyboys online complaining, why don’t women care about politics?
It isn’t politics you milquetoast little shits, it’s basic demographics.
Why have 2.2 kids in an area of 222 Chinese? When your taxes are funding all the latter? Check foreign aid, then come back.
Women hate race-mixing, especially white women, and they despise the idea of their children doing it the most. In a low trust society, women shut their legs to reproduction.

THE OVARIES ARE CLOSED.
CLOSED FOR BUSINESS.

Rather than mix, or force their kids to.

Women are waiting for men to man up and holding the race ransom or everyone dies out. It’s very simple. It’s a strike. It isn’t safe to have kids so they won’t. Women are not obliged, even in the Bible, to get married and have a family. That’s the somewhat secular Darwinian imperative. Jesus had no children. The baby cult is rekt.

ALL the evidence points to this hypothesis and NONE against in the entire world (nor historical examples like Rome).

They won’t tell you, men need to figure it out for themselves. It’s a FITNESS TEST.

We know this from the oxytocin and patriotism link. Happy women are more patriotic (so we know for a fact male xenophiles are depressed, whatever they claim, mixing is a mantrum, it’s sexual acting-out, it’s immature). Well, much like men refusing to sign up for a military that’s pozzed, why would women risk THEIR life in childbirth to bear the weaklings of cowards?

The planners know this. The Soros types. They know. If you make the men weak, the women DO NOT MATTER.
But I’m sure the gammas love to blame them. Isn’t it weird they, like trannies, mentally identify with women more than other men? Isn’t that perverse? Kinda deviant? Why not blame other men? Boris is right there. Trying to sign us back into the EU in all but name as a ‘green’ (anti-white, pro-China) trade agreement (EEC was).

In the late stages of Roman decline, do you imagine the wives respected their husbands? You know, the men they were forced to marry or starve? Rome fucked itself by outbreeding with its slaves, with weak genes. Do not breed with those of low genetic fitness, it’s the hard rule of Mother Nature. If you fuck around, she will fuck you up.
Women sensed a culling was in order and have refused, en masse, not to have children. Because babies get you killed in a hot war. We’ve had a cold war of immvasion across the West for decades, how much longer can it last? They say civil unrest, they say community conflict and other polite terms. From a woman’s perspective, what does that look like? It isn’t safe to settle here. Women are only wandering because men are wavering. It’s a game of chicken but either way, women win. Either men clean house and reclaim the West (purging all degeneracy, however much they like it) and everyone wholesome is happy or like Delilah the women ensure the killing blow of genetic weakness ending, in a mercy killing, so subsequent generations of white people don’t need to suffer being the trafficked slaves of the invaders (paging Rotherham, already happening) because their quisling dads were Judas tier scum and left the door open. More women want the death penalty than men – for whom?

Why does the treason continue?

Because the men have some grandiose group delusions, a different form of cultish NPC.
Sure, multiculturalism will magically fix itself! MAGICALLY. And immigrants are your friends.

They’ve all adopted the selfish Boomer attitude of ‘screw you all, I got mine’.
Do you imagine the immigrants will permit you any porn or any video games? Do you imagine they’ll let you even look at ‘their’ women without putting your eyes out?
There is no Magic Dirt. THIS GOES BOTH WAYS.
Immigrants can’t become white by colonising white countries.
And the white homelands cannot remain culturally civilized and high trust while introducing people from low IQ countries (even if the immigrants themselves are white, see Italian slums about a century ago).
Unlike the Boomers, they won’t get away with their ill-gotten gains.
In Revelations, it’s noted the sinners tried to hide from God. Why? Tower of Babel. An entire lesson in the evil and anti-Christ nature of multiculturalism. Why do they beg to be hidden?
They likely played the r-type game ‘let’s you and him fight’, which is all treason really is. It’s getting the out-group to fight your battles for you. Punching down at white women, after all the immigrant rape, and excusing it, enabling it, is about as low as it gets.
Do you expect women to have sympathy for this?

Women are letting the ship go down but you lot blew the holes in the side of the boat. Cause and effect chain of events.
If the captain won’t do his job, what do you expect us to do? Literally what, mate.

What good are men if they don’t protect their women? To paraphrase Putin. Is that a man? Do those genes deserve to continue? Call it FGTOW if you like. Either way, the ovaries are closed.
All women can do is react to the moral choices of men. The choices are immoral and ongoing so we have slim pickings in terms of options. Women endorse men with reproduction, not fucking. Rutting is for the beasts. Hollywood lies. So what does this say about women’s endorsement of the current crop of men?

The birth rate (and successful marriage rate, which causes wedded births) is a function of homogeneity in a society. Deal with it.
As you increase multiculturalism, women feel more stressed in low trust society and the cortisol makes them fat, manly, angry and unwilling to have kids. The genetic, biological cascade is CAUSED by the environment. This is basic Darwin. We adapt to our environment, for survival or thriving. Now women are in survival mode, did you expect it to be pretty? Thinner? Nicer? More nubile?
Women are like other animals with the intuition, sensing impending danger. The nesting instinct is a prepper response.
Men are playing Chicken Little while enabling their own genetic destruction. They won’t be left to sit happily in the corner once outnumbered by invaders.
They are evolutionally, fatally stupid. Women cannot save them, we are not your mother and you’re no longer a little boy.
The invaders (immigrants, whatever term) once they have the numbers, will kill him and take all his stuff.
It happened in caves and it’s already happening on the micro in schools with white minorities now.
If this is how white men die out, God says they deserve it. You’re supposed to honour thy mother and father, you needn’t like them. There is a duty to protect one’s kin and homelands – from invaders. From the Tower of Babel situation, from the multicultural trading posts of Babylon and the whoredom of Sodom.
It’s literally in the book. Solomon was literally said to have a weakness for foreign women that took him AWAY from the Lord.
The good Samaritan parable is misunderstood. You do not permit them to stay. Guest right is for a guest, that is temporary. If the guest started stealing things and leeching off them (thou shalt not steal, welfare for the out-group is anti-Christ) then the reaction would’ve been different. Sell your cloak to buy a sword. Against whom? Your kin or invaders who threaten them? Love your neighbour as yourself has direct genetic implications. Thessalonians says if a man shall not work, he should not eat. Yet do men stop welfare to people with another home? Nope. They cuck. For the dual passport holders ready to bail on us, should we ever actually need them, they cuck. They literally fund the families of the genetic out-group and bleat about it to women.
In the UK, at least, white women tend to vote Conservative. Men vote Labour, see Clause 4. Men vote for Marxism. Maybe out of stupidity that they care about ‘workers’ or a hatred of hard work (no bootstraps required). Academic Agent should do a voting pattern video (since ww2) but won’t.
Men have let down the team.
You see so many expats who can’t keep their trap shut and sounds like old hags, shrewish women. You’ll be sorry doom-monger types. This is a psyop.
Take the Black Pigeon Speaks type, that love the idea fellow white people are suffering, from bombings, from rapes, from trafficking, the gleeful ‘blackpill’ reporting any other era, any other time period would’ve correctly described as treasonous.
Men have bought into multiculturalism. Women still and have always hated one another. Sisterhood is impossible. Brotherhood is temporarily possible for the smart men to replace the dumb ones (or trusting, gullible weak ones) because men are pack hunters and are erroneously viewing the out-group as potential allies, rather than historic, genetic, permanent enemies. If I were in someone’s house at 2am, I’m not there for a kind reason. Same is true at zero hour of a country, poised for a racial pogrom. The dehumanizing stage of white people has already begun. There are no Good Ones, if immigrants hated the West so much they wouldn’t be here. It’s gaslighting and it’s working.
The relational aggression between men hasn’t evolved because air transport is so novel. Men have yet to adapt. Women had to function in large groups of hundreds in primal times so relational aggression is protective of our kin. Men do not have this. Men, especially weak ones, will try to get along. Like small fish trailing a bigger one. You see entire forums where they side with their enemies to drag down their own women. Isn’t that sickening? Oh but why oh why won’t the women risk everything for them?
Why? So they can be deadbeated? So the guy can hand her the cricket bat at 2am? So he can stand idly by and forgive the immigrant who raped his 8yo daughter and the ‘immigrant’ siblings who drove the 16yo brother to suicide with hate crime style school bullying?
Why oh why don’t white women like them?
THAT’S THE IMPORTANT QUESTION HERE. WOMEN ARE SO HUGE ON SOLIPSISM OBVIOUSLY.
Statistically, most narcissists are – nevermind. [men, it’s men]

(Blackpill Bingo Game: replace all the actions of immigrants with invader and see which fits better, they even cuck for vikings now, that’s the people who raped virginal nuns if you’ll recall).

Guess we just ‘hate’ men. Not like, foreign men, but just literally all men. That makes sense. Literally every man, regardless of conduct. Regardless of religion. Regardless of moral compass and hypocrisy in deed.
Just muh All Men.
Can’t see any reasons, can you?
No, don’t see anything wrong with their conduct – according to the Marxists. They’re perfect little multicultural cucklings, cheering on their own demographic death. Their quisling anti-white behaviour is impeccable. Indeed, stand and hold open the gates as long as the invaders have an additional hole for you to fuck, while you’re fucking over your country/men financially. Then complain about ‘immigration’, to top off the sheer arrogance of it. (Patriotism is not homoerotic, man on man action, it’s white men liking white women and not foreigners, m/f).
Why not, after all? How many immigrants has Nigel Farage imported as concubines? Why would we expect consistency from men? They’re not thinking with their big head. They’re emotional.
Brotherhood in the manosphere is just a warmed over Open Borders anyway. They are not real men and women sense this. They fail in the primary gender role of men. Their ultimate purpose for their life.
Women have never wanted to open the borders (brainwashed children repeating schoolteachers do not count and anti-fa is mostly male).

So do women hate men?
They fear foreigners because if you don’t get raped, your kids will. Or your sons will have to fight a war you refuse to, at some point.
Native men?
Only the enablers, the xenophiles and the cucks. Those are all the same group, whatever differences they pretend.
Some women may be able to lie to themselves consciously (Guardianistas) but the ovaries don’t lie.
Learn from history or be a page in it.
If the West doesn’t halt the steady stream of sewage, let alone start throwing it out, don’t blame us womenfolk when everything starts to smell like shit.
We don’t hate you, per se, we hate that you’re smelling of shit. Just stop smelling of shit. Just get rid of the shit. It isn’t fucking difficult, you evolved for it. No nagging ‘but that isn’t equal, we expect to be compensated’. Living in a high trust civilization with slender nubile wives is the compensation, you morons. It doesn’t just happen. Being respected by your society is the compensation because you earned it, idiots. And nobody gets ‘compensated’ BEFORE doing the work, socialists. You do the work, THEN compensation. The peacock shows the feathers are big and healthy, THEN he gets the peahen tail. In this game of ovarian chicken, you will lose, it’s a question of whether you kill your own kind in doing so. Will white men let their omegas take them all down, out of spite? Why not voting rights ONLY to any white man married to a white woman? No? Why ever not? That’s the only tradition. This would exclude your sterile omega cucks and CCP spies (to pull a ‘Jeremy Hunt’). Women are not obliged to breed with the weak and the treasonous. There is no other viable option to women currently.
Do women hate all men?
Kinda.
We especially hate it when they import wars they’re too cowardly to openly fight.
And that’s why everyone hates Boomers, who started the spigot of pure shit.
Only to bitch and nag and whine when their grandchildren complain about the stench.

We hate navel-gazers saying women are the problem (really it’s the Asian Question, read the Census and who votes bigger gov) and when they aren’t being openly, spitefully anti-white as your local anti-fa group (they’d fit right in), it’s the futile ‘when’s the war? talk. You’re already in it. They’ve already been turned against Their Women, which is play 1 in the book of war psyops. They refuse to acknowledge this, instead going along with anti-white propaganda, when some of it flatters them. You bitches are not Nikola Tesla, you have accomplished absolutely nothing in the easiest times to be alive ever. You aren’t even drafted, little piggy. Teen boys used to beg to be allowed to serve their country and defend their homeland below proper age. Those teen boys had more honour than you ever will. Successful people don’t insult their forefathers who bravely died for them, they don’t nag about The West (you ARE the West) to suck off the funding foreigners and they don’t degrade their own women (it’s like keying your own car). Wake up and smell the propaganda drop. It smells of invader bullshit. You all lack in masculine character. Blackpill is really just Yellowpill, the Asian supremacy cucking. The NWO plan to replace Western dominance with Eastern. They admit it. Do you imagine such corrupt societies will treat you kindly? They have an excess of men, meaning there’s no use for you. When you find yourself praising the CCP just like CNN, pause to consider whether you might’ve been tricked by anti-white propaganda. Rule one in the war book is to make the enemy hate their own kind and make them hopeless. In WW2 we dropped sexually mocking papers describing how their (enemy) women preferred foreign dick. Turn them against their own culture. It 100% fits. Why do you imagine social media keeps up those twitter accounts? Those Youtube channels? Why doesn’t it take those down? It’s Marxist in method, it’s Marxist in intent and it’s Marxist in result. Use your big brain.

Women will never forgive, let alone respect and breed at historic high-trust numbers with their men, until the safety of that high trust society is restored. That is the undeniable fact of the matter.

The ones who deny the ongoing genocide much like the Red Army rapes when it’s happening to women, boys and girls before their very eyes in highly public court cases is a great reason to hate someone. If not for treason, then for what?

You can’t spell treason without reason.

Mary Whitehouse should be patron saint of 4chan, at this point. She was right before Enoch. Nobody else foresaw drag time story hour or child strippers in gay bars dressed in drag. She did. She walked so Enoch could run.
https://www.defendevropa.com/2018/news/enoch-powell-why-they-hate-him/
Politics being downstream of culture. Times are never different, people are still shit. Now men are making the same Marxist ‘mistake’ and being anti-Enochs (for ‘diversity’). There is no blackpill, there is only yellowpill. Cuckpill. Cowardpill. You don’t get to complain about your smell, other people have been able to detect it for a while. J’accuse, Judas.

Have fun being dog dads, you fucking degenerates. [This happened in late Rome too. Ask reddit.]

men aren’t equal, either

also

No wicked man knows happiness, and least of all the seducer of others.

The Hollywood-worshiping whores are shameless, do not pity any of them. They chose to be alone, often in foreign lands.
The manosphere constantly fails (in its stated goals) because it also sells a delusion of equality, but exclusively to men. It denies men their manhood in masculine competition with one another. With nothing to prove or reach for, they are pulled down into the bucket by their own crabs of apathy and nihilism, with a smattering of genuine misogyny at times, to further cast off blame for the fruits of their manly agency (really shades of cowardice). They play themselves.

All in all, looking at photos like that, I understand my elder male relatives: we need a good war. Such decadence cannot endure long, degeneracy never lasts. It is the rule of history. “We’ve” had the greatest rise in history so I fear our collective downfall. As one party of many latter generations who shirked the poison chalice, this is frustrating. It doesn’t matter if you were AT the party if they were personally trashing your house (the West). The libertarian arguments of social harm (muh individualism) are sociopathic and atomistic, they don’t scale up to a village, let alone nation or race. They are anarchists in suits, moral relativists on the fence with a calculator. Fine, be free to do drugs as you please, and equally free to die from them, yes? No bailouts, no manmade exceptions to natural law. No synthetic sin-eating like antibiotics for slags. No exceptions at all for pity’s sake. And if men wish to leave the West, deserters in our time of demographic crisis, we must respect that r-select impulse by banning their return. A house divided and all, no man may serve two masters (or nations). No anchor babies, anchor wives or anchor dual financial lives.

The cucks must be shucked.

The thirst after fame is greater than that after virtue; for who embraces virtue if you take away its rewards? – Juvenal

The Hollywood siren song has been going for a long time. Everyone falls for it, whether or not we act upon it. It’s pre-critical (Piaget) childhood programming. So-called incels should attack Hollywood. Why is the Tony Stark playboy stripper pole stuff in a KID’s film? Why do twelve-year olds need to see a foursome? 18:41 Subtext nobody dare address: successful men must be a slut. Is that true to reality? No. Quite the opposite, it’s insulting and demeaning to agency, but they own Trojan stock and other corporations (read: penicillin shots) that would go bankrupt if the moral bankruptcy stopped. The anti-capitalists oddly never point this out.

How wrong would that one scene seem, if the sexes were reversed? Our natural reaction is dulled by repetition, and children viewed this.

in full;

Refrain from doing ill; for one all powerful reason, lest our children should copy our misdeeds; we are all too prone to imitate whatever is base and depraved.

I haz questions.

Is rape evil? Yes.
Is slavery evil? Yes.
Is porn the acceptable cover for exploiting trafficked slaves? Yes, statistically. Check with the charities and research.
Is it the entire demand behind slavery, for public profit? Yes, statistically. Check with the charities and research. There is no product without demand.
Should the government shoot all those involved in slavery? Yes. As public deterrent. Also audit for corruption and confiscate past funds.
Would porn still exist? ..No. Not new, Western porn.

Huh.

Does Porn/Hollywood (hardcore/soft) pay taxes on the money it admits to making? No.
Does porn cause known neurological issues such as hypofrontality? Yes.
Can those be reversed? Usually a little but not fully. Window of opportunity during development. Neural pruning.
Is it used to groom/corrupt children? Yes. In every case.
Is it being progressively normalised as softcore with the slippery slope over time into ‘Hollywood’? Yes.

See “The Kiss” scandal. Now adverts portray children passionately kissing. No chaste cheek pecks. Not anymore. Did you notice? A non-porn user would. Then there’s the obvious subversion:

If that happened in the 1950s, what would happen to the people who made that video?

1850s, what would happen to the producers and distributors?

What is that video, which was screen-capped from?

Did you immediately know it for what it was?

Why not?

You think you haven’t seen child porn.. but they start subtle.

This is cognitive dissonance.

Is watching rape legal? No. Aiding and abetting, duty to intervene or report.
Should watching filmed rape of trafficking victims be legal? No.
How can you tell the difference?

Trick question, there isn’t one.

Deliberately.

A non-groomed person capable of consent simply refuses to produce such videos. It is a symptom of a warped mind.

Is the purpose of porn sexual humiliation? Yes. Both viewer (Jesus warned of voyeurism’s evil and we all know about the cucks) and serial rape victim (see life outcomes of that trauma unless you’re a Guardian lefty, look for them).

Is it legal to violate your own human right to intimate privacy? Is it possible? This seal can only be broken ONCE. Consider Hollywood celebrities who strip off in films and imitate sexual acts for money. If their ‘nude photos’ aka intentionally created porn, are released, how can they be outraged? Category error prevails. There’s something lost already, they already withdrew their right to that type of privacy, their violation has been publicly witnessed. Apart from expected privacy (fair) of the photos themselves and profit of the photos themselves, what is the issue? Stigma. Like calling a porn “star” a whore when there’s video evidence. Category error. How can a celebrity with a ‘sex tape’ not be fair game for public scrutiny of who they’re fucking in future? Surely this becomes public information, acceptable fodder? You can’t have it both ways. Right to publicity has limits e.g. crime taking place, public interest in that. They surrendered that sanctity of intimacy by their own volition.

For the ‘define porn’ crowd – salacious nudity in particular situations intended to stimulate the libido. Most people wouldn’t even pose nude for an art class, finding that alone too ‘degrading’ (objectification for non-sexual purposes). Women used to produce ‘porn’ (really erotica) all the time minus the nudity condition for their husbands alone. Men didn’t carry around cameos of their wife’s face for sentimental purposes. That way, it isn’t cheating, since she can satisfy his libido on long journeys when she isn’t present to do it herself. Isn’t this, moral? So you can’t forget the issue of audience: purpose and anonymity. You can’t suddenly pick and choose who sees your material of published crassness if it’s hypothetically offered up to the world. That audience consideration is either supporting a relationship or degrading.

Middle-class white-washing of perversion pisses me off. It isn’t an art film, it’s a skin flick with subtitles.

WW2 guys encouraged to paint their planes started this.

Now rap is played to kids, subtitles of porn: ooh, aaah, yes, baby.

Targeted sexualisation of children already has a name: grooming.

Can masturbation be outlawed? No. Don’t be absurd. Strawman.
Does a healthy man need “porn” to do so? No. That is erectile dysfunction, or impotence as it used to be known.
Is porn designed as a supernormal stimulus? Yes.
Who principally uses it? Men with a surgically mutilated penis. This has been researched. Look into it.
Why? Psyops. Disenchant the white man. Attract non-whites to our shores also. A baited hook (called hookers).

Is it art? No. Modern art is also psyops. It was admitted (CIA). Meanwhile, how can there be a copyright on sterile reproductive acts, it’s medically impossible. If non-sterile, ancient therefore where is the right to charge for a thing when I can watch two flies fuck outside my window? Claim to exclusive right dismissed, where is the profit, then? Ah, subversion, distraction (bread/circuses) and international mental damage of otherwise stronger populations. Like the SJW hiring and plots.

Are people ashamed to admit they watch it? Yes.

Why? They sense the evil.

Does crime go up or down when porn is highly accessible? It goes up, see attacks on Japan’s schoolgirls for a good example. Predators are inspired by videos and practise mentally with them.

Do incarcerated prisoners show the same pattern? Yes.

Does it reduce libido? No, it actually stokes it (testosterone) and keeps the flame going, most predators have a low IQ and terrible imagination and therefore rely on external stimuli, including stories in forums about how to conduct certain attacks. Pathological populations do not behave as normal ones would predict.

What are the outcomes of porn ‘stars’, when tracked? Trauma, disease and suicide. All antisocial and preventable.
Is participation of the result, an endorsement of all practices related to it? Yes. Unless you’re a hypocrite.

Is the internet for children? No. Parents must be strongly shamed on this point.
Did erotica (the 2d non-damaging form of paper ‘porn’) exist pre-internet? Underground with legal restrictions on access from practicality.
Do kids or parents groom younger kids? Yes. Tragically.
How do they do this? Smartphones, mostly.
Do the search engines push this material on children? Yes.
Is general smartphone use in minors medically harmful? In many ways, yes.

Why aren’t smartphones/computers age restricted in sale and use? …..Apple stocks.

Customizing for wider market access, how shockingly libertarian.

And everyone gains in freedom from the situation, so it’ll never happen.

Remember degenerates, you’re probably watching people trafficked as kids, being raped.

Enjoy.

[postmodern r-types are BTFO by this line, it’s been field tested on Guardian types for maximum potency]

Think about it, what is a “pimp”? A sex slave owner.

If the threat of a beating or death looms, is that consent, shitlibs? No. No it is not. Coercion vitiates consent, likewise duress to signed contracts.

Bonus: according to whom was the Prohibition a failure?

Hollywood.

What actually happened?

Crime tanked, including rape of adults and children (alcohol is the most common date rape drug used to weaken ability to resist or plain knock kids and lightweights out) and domestic abuse of adults and children went down too (with no oh-so-convenient “drink” excuses). Why weren’t you taught that in school? Why did the People want Prohibition in the first place? They were noticing things. Consider the timing. Pre-Nazi.

As for driving things underground: should they be? Isn’t that better? Wouldn’t the thrill of taboo be better for users too?

Where is the right of healthy people to live without being bombarded by porn? It’s even outside for the “go outside” types, it’s on billboards! We do not consent, it is forced upon our minds. WHY?

How much does the stress of adverts cost us in the health service?

It is in soaps, in adverts, in kid’s films. It doesn’t sell, actually so WHY is it there, WHY isn’t there a choice in whether to consume it knowingly, beforehand? Bring back the CODE, Hollywood fears it.

Even young male toplessness in “kid’s films” would’ve disgusted your recent ancestors. Is nudity always sexual or not, Hollywood? Then why include it, or not? Rationing levels of clothing certainly don’t apply now, do they?

You want high culture? Bring back the laws about what theatres can and cannot show (previously covered). Most people want to go to the theater – if they had ratings systems like films – nudity, political propaganda, sexuality bullshit. We want to see real plays, not facsimile brothel shows. Most plays aren’t selling because we don’t want to see naked strangers, on stage or in the gym, thanks. Goes for most young people, actually. In surveys.

As for the white issue with ‘sexbots’ – they creep us out as lifeless humanoids. It triggers our disgust to necrophilia (or rape of the vulnerable and unconscious). The slow ones in motion and ‘speech’ seem mentally backward, like children (or physically looking like children). A chosen people who produce them and attempt to normalise their use in the MSM do not view the group they resemble as human, so to them it’s more like bestiality and they enjoy it as a sign of their superiority. They also have no historic qualms with rape. First they must produce dependent customers in the out-group by alienating them from the loving thing it seeks to cheaply replace. Seen any bots like that lately? Any youtube comments seem weirdly repetitive or targeted in this direction? Why does youtube allow them? Finally, they seek to monetise the constant online feed of spying data… for updates, of course. There won’t be a Tinder-like database of your fetishes and intimate photos. That’s impossible.

Porn and other degeneracy

Wholesome memes of traditional morality

The predictable triggering of male thots is funny.

A foreigner comments: “It shows pre selection and makes a man more attractive in the eyes of other females”

….No, it doesn’t.

A woman interjects: “no… slutty men are not more attractive to women

He ignores her because he’s foreign and dumb.

They actually think they get to tell white women what we want….. hahahahaha.

It’s always the slutty men saying this pick-up is kewl shit, isn’t it?

And when you point out they’re skanks…

Thought you were proud, bruh? Why aren’t you prideful?

NOBODY wants a used-up whore. NOBODY. Foreigners keep pushing this Muh Dick Exception appeal yet the miscegenation rate stays the same….

https://biblehub.com/bsb/1_corinthians/5.htm

Expel the Immoral Brother

9I wrote you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people. 10I was not including the sexually immoral of this world, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world. 11But now I am writing you not to associate with anyone who claims to be a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a verbal abuser, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat.

No such thing as a trad male thot.

12What business of mine is it to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? 13God will judge those outside. “Expel the wicked man from among you.”b

On another picture, an excellent parody of the manwhore’s faux chagrin:

“I haven’t masturbated in ten years but can’t keep my dick dry for longer than 3 days…”

“When will I find THE one, man? Where is she??…”

Entitled pricks, literally. If you won’t value your peen, why should any lady?

You chose to burn out your pleasure circuits, hedonists don’t deserve to be ‘happy’.

Male suicides up because of Netflix

You only figured they hate us after the child porn ‘scandal’? Really?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890856719302886

The release of 13 Reasons Why was associated with a significant increase in monthly suicide rates among U.S. youth aged 10 to 17 years. Caution regarding the exposure of children and adolescents to the series is warranted.

Were they mostly white too?

Caution? Fuck caution, I want arrests. This was incitement.

Since it involves gory scenes of criminal acts, children shouldn’t be anywhere near it.

I don’t think you can accurately claim women as the hysterical over-emotional sex when males commit more self-murder, a crime, as well as other murder. This is clearly irrational self-destruction, in its most literal sense.

So you often see men murder their own children before themselves, because it’s all murder.

From the PDF:

Imitation may have contributed to the increase in the male youth suicide rate after the release of 13 Reasons Why, given a male adolescent character made a serious suicide attempt by firearm at the end of the series. A well-known gender paradox in suicide also exists, with male rates of suicide being higher than female rates and female rates of attempted suicide being higher than male rates across the lifespan.

Across lifespan – so…. duh. Control for that and it vanishes.

Self-murder must be shamed, (possibly mocked*) and legally punished (like France confiscating all of their belongings), romanticizing it and showing examples makes it more probable (Werther effect).

Degeneracy includes cultural or self-indulgence of self-destruction.

This is toxic. This is actively corrupting the young. That is a crime when we call it grooming.

And the idea of kids not being influenced is a blatant lie, fathers doing this should be ashamed too.

“Serious” attempt – all of them? Like, taking the male example, this is the worst example a provider can provide.

It’s the least masculine thing possible, stop trying to sex it up, Hollywood!
[Note: many so-called men who commit ‘suicide’ when others rely on them also refuse the prospect of a draft and won’t join the military, this cowardly fact demonstrates how it’s purely self-indulgent and not plain psychiatric ‘suffering’ because we have medications for that.]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3804892/

The current study aimed to examine whether a family history of suicidal acts predicts severity of suicide attempts.

It does.

Of all the examples of a provider, offing yourself in mildly difficult times (globally, historically, economically) is a disgrace.

Let’s not mince words, I don’t when women are at fault either. Snowflakes go home.

Social learning theory holds that we must hold these criminals responsible.

It is a disgrace and the word needs to come back into usage. If you take on a responsibility (spouse, kids) then you’d better damn well not ragequit because you racked up credit card bills on showing off to the neighbours. WTF.

Responsibilities are called commitments for a reason.

A free man with no commitments? Different but no less toxic culturally.

A man who is setting examples and has people who depend on him to survive? Like a stay at home mother who can’t get back into the workforce? Fuck you for saying that’s a ‘choice’. That’s a weak man. Don’t take on what you don’t want to be responsible for. We must hold men accountable as the head of the house if they take on that role. 

No half-arsing, blaming women or complaining it’s ‘hard’ like they’re down a coal mine farting black.

They abuse their gender role by claiming to have all the accountability and then wimping out like a child** (adultery/cucking, divorce, abandoning kids, substance abuse, domestic violence), when it turns out to be harder than glamorous 50s postcard martini sipping after work. Fucking DUH. I’d be interested in a study of father and mother history because I’d assume the father’s suicide to have a larger effect (being the provider).

**We must expect men to be men again. Penis doesn’t qualify. Nobody will respect you on the basis of chromosomes, male of female. This is silly. Those delusional ones appeal to a time that has never existed (Biblical times tested men and failures resulted in death).

I’ll bet the number of ‘successful’ suicides among males disproportionately came from the under-diagnosed male borderlines. Put that information out there, not ‘killing yourself as revenge’ propaganda.

I almost think the MRAs like other men offing themselves, they seem giddy to talk about it. Oddly, they never want vulnerable men to obtain diagnosis and treatment before that point so either they logically want to abuse the situation for attention (a borderline trait) or they hate their fellow man so much they perversely see less competition for women as a good thing? It’s twisted but destroying your own sex is still sexism. Corrupting them and filling their head with tall tales about how great suicide is, that’s standard sociopath or borderline fare.

Such males replace the father, who usually wasn’t around.

MRAs would have no following were it not for deadbeats.

The superego forms based on what your parents do and society accepts.

The Suicide Paradox (Rebroadcast)

Even reporting suicide can prime (already weak) people into doing it (so the porn violence thing must occur, among others).

Glamorizing it is blatant incitement, like the pathetic Elliot attention*. Rich entitled kid can’t buy love, news at 11.

or Mixed race guy ask where the white women at? or Idiot tries to demand respect.

So much so-called masculine media glamorizes suicide too (WW1 films, 300) that toxic masculinity, if properly defined, would align closely to degeneracy as it is used to weaken men specifically.

Literally, to degenerate man.

‘Toxic masculinity’ is the Left’s way of referring to male self-destruction. With different ideals, for Marxist, anti-natal purposes. The premise of degeneracy has been true since late-stage Rome. Very Zeus. Terrible father, husband, angry drunkard, bored, vain, foolish rapist.

Just like ‘toxic femininity’ is fake nice, also valuing itself by promiscuous sexual attention and wants to conceive only to murder the baby post-birth. Very Lilith. Same vices, with the genders switched.

Both sexes deserve positive, strong examples. The ancients didn’t respect Zeus because he had a beard and they didn’t respect Lilith for having breasts. They mocked their deities constantly for their human flaws. All Zeus did was sit around waiting to get offended. Original broflake.

Goethe was harsher than I’m being:

And now you want to hold a writer accountable and condemn his work, which, misinterpreted by a few dim-witted souls, may have rid the world of a dozen idiots and ne’er-do-wells who didn’t know any better than to blow out the weak remainder of what little light they had!

Don’t hold others accountable for idiots’ actions.

Count it in the crime stats.

Don’t glamorize male death nor incite it.

It’s almost like humanity NEEDED war as a pressure release valve for the rest of the time.

Ask yourself: are the men who kill themselves in the most peaceful time of human history capable of providing for a family, in any reality? When we mess with natural selection, nature has a funny way of course-correcting, although many suicides are likely preventable.

If society were a meritocracy, some people will lose out. They’re just louder now.

Bitch lit

If Roosh V were a woman, he’d have written this book.

Best page screencap to illustrate my point:

amazon.com/Nice-Just-Place-France-Everything/dp/1451687761

Nice is Just a Place in France: How to Win at Basically Everything by The Betches

I don’t know whether I love or hate this book because parts of it are either spot-on or dead wrong.

If you want to know where much degenerate propaganda is aimed at women – getting a husband books.

That’s the reward. Unfortunately, they seem to be correct, men do marry the sluts generally.

This book opens (you can read it online) by slagging off virtuous women as losers.

“Nicegirls”.

That isn’t the wrong end of the stick, it’s two sticks that look alike.

Being a doormat isn’t a virtue but good people do have generally better lives (conscientiousness studies).

If you ignore the degenerate sections it’s pretty funny.

I think the MRAs would love this book to justify their misogyny, that alone is worth the price.

Because their brand of sexism is vindicated by …another.

To avoid the bitches or stop them stealing your husband, you must know how they think.

Either buy bitch lit or befriend them. I know my choice.

Scummy people

https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2018/10/08/white-women-get-warned-about-hijacking-kneeling-during-the-national-anthem-to-protest-rape-culture/
White women, know your place.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/733275/super-gonorrhoea-epidemic-Freshers-week-STI-STD-UK-epidemic
They’ll expect me to fund their infertility treatments in twenty years.

Assuming they’re still alive.

https://nypost.com/2018/10/03/rapist-sentenced-to-thousands-of-years-in-prison-kills-himself/
Meanwhile the sentence is here is non-existent.

Deterrent sentences work.

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/hero-abortionist-sold-drugs-reused-instruments-gave-women-stds/

Implying catching an STD at a clinic by default rampant with them on various surfaces isn’t a risk?

Why are specula not all disposable?

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2014/06/14/how-clean-is-your-pap-smear-that-metal-speculum/

Why aren’t they used in male prostate exams, if it’s really nothing to worry about?

No wedding, no opinion

What do you think a marriage is?

Seriously for a moment.

 

What do you think a marriage entitles you to, gentlemen?

Legally.

These degenerates want the rights of a husband without the responsibilities.

Er….

No?

YOU’RE ENTITLED TO NOTHING.

YOU SHOULD GET NOTHING.

GOOD DAY, DEGENERATE.

What did you expect?

It’s like if I didn’t buy Apple stock ten years ago and sent them an invoice backdated of all the money they owed me. How the fuck does America expect this shit works?

It doesn’t work. What are you doing? You’re breaking marriage. Literally.

Ya gotta invest before you expect.

You reap as you sow.

If you don’t sow, you get nothing.

THAT SHIT IS BIBLICAL AND BASIC AS HELL.

K-selection, bitches. It’s in the Little Red Hen! Where were you, Tyrone?

That is not your wife.

Expecting the property rights of a head of a household is invalid. You didn’t buy the house. You didn’t step a toe in that direction. Actually, given ample time and opportunity, you ran in the opposite direction and deserted the prospect. Decisions will be made without you, snowflake.

Black guy abandons woman, expects to have a say.

What?

It’s like claiming disability because they suffer and you suffer as a human too. Not how it works, snowflake. You can’t apply something so broadly that all sperm is magically a baby and something you considered trash can be back-dated as ownership rights based on your present feelings (and over the person who did make it, kept it alive and does actually own it, had medical responsibility this whole time and didn’t neglect it).

It’s like the SJWs crazy enough to count a fully-consented sex act they regret as rape, it’s the exact same reasoning and it’s shit.

Present doesn’t alter past. Anything less is insanity.

A marriage is not just a piece of paper and has FA to do with wuv, sorry, love.

It’s an investment document.

She makes babies, you get an opinion.

That’s IT.

HOLY SHIT, AMERICA.

Just when I think you can’t get any worse.

It shouldn’t list father on the birth certificate but husband. Maybe a separate section if it’s a rape baby. Because guess who’s paying for all the upkeep, food, rent, medical expenses?

Does the mother own his sperm that went in the trash all those years too? Irrational claims go both ways.

There’s no logical way to sell this. They are being anti-science.

You didn’t make that baby. You didn’t want that baby.

Why do you complain that you can’t get something you rejected?

The entitlement, I can smell it from here. What a cesspit.

Can women claim all a man’s earnings from fucking him once? [no, contrary to reports with lacking citation, wife is a distinct assortment of rights, if you aren’t married and try to claim common law marriage here, we’re smart and civilized enough to know there’s no such thing, you must consciously consent to the legal structure, no slow slides without paperwork or anyone could claim to have lived with you and slept with you]

Seriously now, consider how much more badly this will go for men if you allow it to continue. So you don’t marry a bitch but she still gets all the legal entitlements of a wife without even a prenup.

You can only get a prenup on a wedding. No wedding, no nuptials, no prenup.

Fucking r-types reee. You wanted your no-investment lifestyle, you KEEP your no-returns lifestyle.

You can’t retroactively own something.

Basic property rights.

Deadbeats get nothing. You shouldn’t have left. You should’ve gotten married. Your mistake, individually, we shouldn’t break the legal system of thousands of years for chocolate snowflake.

Men ejaculate into socks everyday, they don’t own a baby.

From a purely biological perspective (ya gonna deny biology now?) you didn’t grow something for nine months putting your life at risk, and then again to take the medical risk of death to bring it into the world. It’s like Loki’s gambit here, the sperm you gave away are no longer yours, fertile or not. You can’t take anything away.

Landing in a sock or ending up in an egg. A seed on rock or fertile soil.

He’s a sperm donor, they also revoke their legal rights, any they might have had.

Consequences, bitches! You put yourself in an unmarried situation!

Are you also gonna insist you get rights back (they’re not refundable, it’s like women wanting back their period eggs) for all the trashed sperm since your balls dropped? Pretty sure those were abandoned for at least days too.

Legally you don’t have a leg to stand on.

Do you want all the cells of your faeces and urine and sweat (skin cells) back too? You can’t privilege rights over one abandoned cell to another. Not how the law works. This whole thing is absurd.

The biological proof racking up showing how a baby actually grows in their mother, is itself a growing field.

These guys sound like SJWs.

Reproduction is not equal. It’s the woman’s investment. She owns it because legally, it’s her body. You only get a right over a woman’s reproductive system when you marry her. Simple, you’d think?

Her body, her choice is a legal and medical point. It is misapplied to contraception. You don’t own her periods either. If men could carry babies, the woman wouldn’t own it since the carrier is the one taking all the medical risk (including death) and hence, all the responsibility. He doesn’t own a single one of her cells, he didn’t marry her.

Make your own baby, in your own body, then it’ll belong to you!

Seriously, if men did that the law would then be on their side. If you risk death to create life, you deserve it.

As it is because they’re too scared to develop that technology and actually use it on themselves? Men don’t make babies and so don’t own babies unless married to the mother.

You can’t grow a child in an artificial womb unattached to a body, it would be stunted (fetal psychology, it needs the carrier for more than blood and nutrients, your knowledge of science is woefully out of date). Women are vastly complex baby machines, men just switch it on.

I don’t get to turn up to a gold mine on land I might’ve bought but didn’t and grab some because it’s.. there now. Nah-uh, there’s a process. Opportunities are windows because you can always see them but you can’t get to them anymore once they close. You passed it up. You and only you.

A product of adultery doesn’t belong to the cheating dick. It’s the guy who owns the womb (or the original womb-owner if single).

Aren’t they libertarians, usually? They know how property rights work. Someone hunting on your land is trespassing, that isn’t their deer. It doesn’t belong to the person who sees what was made by the land and selfishly wants it.

“My baby”, says the deadbeat. Nope!

Unfit parent too. Women also avoid marrying them too.

And note the narcissism often used in these cases like it’s a toy to get revenge instead of a person with best interests.

“Our child”, says the husband. Depriving a child of its human right to a family life with the happy adopted arrangement is abuse, an abuse of its human rights. I hope it grows up and sues him, the kid would win. He was spiting the child and ruining its future to hurt the mother and prove a petty point, how evil. If I won’t keep you, they can’t either? 

What did you do for those nine months plus time after? Nothing. You didn’t even marry her pregnant, the time limit long since passed. You passed over your right to an opinion. Ask any traditionalist. It’s better off elsewhere, the mother is correct. The father is an abandonment case. You don’t get to leave a kid alone then wonder why you can’t visit them like a dog in the kennels after a long holiday.

It reminds me of when Emma Watson abandoned a kitten then came back in the guy’s life ages later to get her cat back. He told her to take a hike and she did, now if she knew she was taking the piss… what’s the excuse? There isn’t one.

Biology is starkly clear.

The single sperm gamete that eventually (time delay a week to conception) made that child was abandoned (legal rights revoked, you do not own your medical waste) and you don’t have any claim to the maternal cells they fused with to produce a zygote AND implant, the first stage of a baby. Men have nothing to do with actual, biological reproduction, it all happens inside the mother. A child is genetically mostly their mother (X-chromosomes have more material, her blood, various substances from her body in utero including vitamins and minerals leeched from her bones, stem cells exchanged with maternal cells into the foetus including brain cells etc.) so nah. This isn’t equal.

The idea men reproduce is a biological myth. Produce what, exactly? They shed a gamete, like a skin cell. In number and value (nothing). This gamete has no medical risk associated and will be shed in nocturnal emissions regardless of choice. It legally counts as human medical waste and men dispose of it as such. Female seahorses don’t reproduce either. If you want to be very technical about it. The production event has nothing to do with them. Biologically or psychologically. A virgin woman can technically impregnate herself and theoretically reproduce asexually (no sexual act in that case, which is one definition) with sperm in a condom in the street. The autistic focus on information fails under scrutiny too. To define by DNA when there are more things being discovered everyday (inc. RNA and mtDNA) is essentially calling a baby one type of one single set of half a code, corrupted, that cannot support itself without a case (uterus) and has no platform to “live” (mother’s blood, presence) or in this example, read/be read. Is a CD with half a human DNA code, no case, no drive, broken (mutations repaired/corrected by the mother’s DNA), a baby? Any scientific person would ridicule this outdated legal interpretation. Your errant sperm entitles you to nothing. Your hand is not your fingerprint, police can’t take your hand. Your brain is not your IQ, schools own none of your brain despite adding to your IQ. No transfer of ownership. Your words are not your tongue, nobody can cut out your tongue for singing their song. Non sequiturs are fallacies. A woman’s period gamete shedding (women shed their gametes not-living too) doesn’t entitle her to a living baby either. She’s gotta make it herself and produce the life. It takes about a year. That is a job.

J.O.B. That is work. Are you Communists now? Are you entitled to the labour of others?

The quality of life is something only the female of our species can give, to date (and it doesn’t always work, as in miscarriage). Is the man responsible for that too? Can a man miscarry? Exactly.

Life is the organism, completed in its maturation to independent life (growth, birth and infanthood), it’s very clear biology and you can read Darwin. He wrote enough books on it.

Tell me, in the pure data example, who gives life? As such, to who does it belong?

Data without a computer is nothing. The computer also has its own data to work the hardware or the input is again, worthless.

Humans reproduce sexually as a rule, we evolved our gamete system and behaviour around this rule. There are exceptions and it gets weird. The baby itself, if grown and born, would still die as an infant without the mother’s milk. The father does fuck-all again. Nature says baby belongs to Mommy. Get over it.

Women have childbearing, stay in your gender role lane. A woman giving you a gun doesn’t own the medal for all the people you shot with it. That would be ridiculous.

Is DNA in a petri dish a baby? Legally, we’ve been over this and I don’t like it as a situation but I comprehend how it works as an exception. Important difference for the triggered idiots who think their feelings should make fact and Onan’s spilled seed should be counted a baby by law in the census. Miscarried fetuses don’t count as babies either, no infanticide there, if even the mother doesn’t own early stage, pre-birth as a separate legal entity to her body, you certainly have no fucking say, Mr. pre-conception.

Preconceived = wrong. Onan didn’t go by the DNA/seed rule, it was marriage that made the father by law. He didn’t actually marry the woman he was screwing and therefore knew it was wrong to get her pregnant since it wouldn’t be his. In a plot twist, God counted them as married by contextual technicality. Doesn’t change the rules, does it?

Pre-conception, your role = no baby. Point on the doll where the scientism hurt you.

What is the value of a DNA test in this case? A test of what, there was no acknowledged baby in the conception process or via marriage ceremony later even after conception. He didn’t claim his rights. Be ye fruitful and don’t run away from the tree?

You breathe in DNA fragments from people on public transport, so what?

Microbes on them or from inside them are DNA too.

You eat DNA fragments from the chef in your food. Did you steal or was it normal shedding?

They say we should sell licenses to reproduce. Yeah, we do.

S’called a marriage license.

Although technically it’s a claim on reproduction (the process) the lady does. A male claim. Male proposal? And the lady has to accept it (#womb4rent) or it doesn’t count. Tell me, where was the offer in that case? He didn’t want a baby then and should have no rights over a baby he didn’t want in the present. If he didn’t want to be a father genetically, don’t fuck a fertile woman. It’s very simple, that’s how babies are made. Get a vasectomy too.

The child deserves a better life with a father that wants it and gives a shit.

And the precedent will mean, if truly applied, that rapists have ownership of the baby the woman (or little girl) didn’t consent to produce, over her husband’s/own right to abort it. What in tarnations. A rapist has no paternal rights. You can’t take all that carrier agency and medical risk away on a flimsy what if emotional fallacy pretext.

And what happens when two men screw? Do they get to ask for their sperm back?

If this case stands, spermicide is homicide. Literally. That’s how stupid.

Are you sure, America? Is this the future you want?

Sperm isn’t life. Neither are eggs. A zygote, then implanted is life. 

You might notice that’s the woman’s job, 100%.

Do you want donated blood back too because it ended up in a rich person? Bloody hell.

The “baby killer” rhetoric they try to pull is so empty, like fathers never murder their maturing, born children or push a woman down the stairs to cause a miscarriage (not the mother’s choice). I don’t think the mother approves either in those cases and I don’t think that changes the fact. Any of them. So male choice to end pregnancy in another body – fine by pigs, but female choice – Satan? They even try to pull this manipulative bullshit off when the baby in question has nothing to do with them, they didn’t contribute anything, even sperm, they try to control the situation on principle that they want ownership control of a stranger. What principle? Slavery? If a man does something I disapprove of, can I physically curtail his rights to stop him? What if it causes him medical harm? Ah, but no convenient foot-stamping guilt trips for the abortion-loving fuckers when they’re male, eh? You do know the Pill is an abortion chemical, right? Chemical abortion is the earliest kind. The Pill is an abortifacient, that’s how it works biologically. It’s the earliest form of abortion. So if you’ve been screwing women on the Pill and you’re happy about that, you’ve aborted your own children by your own logic, at some point? There was a fused zygote. If you were responsible at the fusion… “Men” even feed a woman the morning-after pill or abortive herbs and claim they were morally right to do it! No, there’s a poisoning case, domestic abuse for concealment of forced medication, acting as a doctor without a license and then the actual abortion thing ending a baby’s life itself. Are they not baby murderers?

Crickets from the guys whining about agency.

Worse than that, monsters. Imagine the uproar, the other way around. They already complain about male rape enough.

Considering sperm as usable materials wouldn’t even work.

Since men have issue with topics like this, imagine you threw away some metal-based trash and someone else used it to build something great over nine months and it damaged their health to do so. They sell it to someone who loves it. That’s a beautiful thing and better than abortion, remember. But does that person owe you the thing you threw out and wanted no claim (responsibility) over?

Not one single wonky chair leg to stand on.

And I would bet money – he STILL won’t marry her, even for the statistical good of the child. Yeah, let’s help that guy! Stefan’s too scared to bring that up in his lectures (to women) and add two to two and make four. A family is a unit under marriage. Any claims of “she’s taking my family away” should be met with “where’s the marriage certificate?” Your? Family? Really? No.

Words have meanings.

Pathogenic cancer DNA change proven

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180627160355.htm
Study STDs. Dare ya.

“The research, published in the journal eLife, shows that the human leukemia virus (HTLV-1) acts at a large number of sites across the human genome, disrupting the regulation of tens of thousands of genes.”

One virus.

One strain, of one virus.

“HTLV-1 is thought to infect more than 10 million people around the world. The virus can be transmitted through unprotected sex, blood transfusions, and from mother to baby via breast milk.”
Harmless fun. Fuck a Thai girl, kill your baby. Who are you to judge? They aren’t hurting anyone. What the wife doesn’t know, won’t hurt her. – Satan

“They add that the findings provide new insight into how viruses like HTLV-1 can alter the structure of the human genome, which can result in diseases such as cancer.”

The wages of sin.

When will it be taught in Sex Ed?

Never ever ever ever.